Summary of Case studies on the sourcing hub concept by Anupam Agarwal, Arnoud De Meyer, Luk N. Van...
-
Upload
haris-naved-ahmed -
Category
Business
-
view
137 -
download
1
Transcript of Summary of Case studies on the sourcing hub concept by Anupam Agarwal, Arnoud De Meyer, Luk N. Van...
Strategic Sourcing and Negotiations Skills
EMBA Program Special Assignment
on
Case studies on the sourcing hub concept by Anupam Agarwal, Arnoud De Meyer, Luk N. Van Wassenhove
Submitted by:
Haris Naved Ahmed, ERP 08708, MBA Evening, IBA
Syed Yawar Imam, ERP 08708, MBA Evening, IBA
Haris Naved AhmedERP08708
Syed Yawar ImamERP08709
About the Paper
• This paper that I have analyzed is about a concept
called the Sourcing Hub. It helps us revisit certain
concepts of Sourcing and Supply chain management.
The primary purpose of this research is to integrate
information on upstream Raw Material suppliers so as
to add value to the Supply chain.
What Exactly is a Sourcing Hub?
• “The sourcing hub is an upstream entity in supply
chains, focused on developing collaborative
relationships with an OEM's suppliers and
suppliers' RM suppliers.”
• The hub can be deployed as a physical department
or unit within an OEM's organizational structure
Research Methodology and Results
• For many companies, raw material is a huge part of the cost, there are lot of companies that source theirraw materials from different suppliers but again this kind of sourcing fails to recognize the commonpool of suppliers of raw materials which are actually upstream.
• A sourcing hub tries to integrate all these suppliers in terms of commonalities that they provide to anyOEM.
• The Methodology that the authors have followed is a case by case analysis to understand the sourcingprocess in different companies. They have earmarked four companies for study namely
1. DMV in Germany,
2. TMV in India,
3. TDV in South Korea
4. BKI in France
Research Methodology and Results
• Of these, the first three firms are automotive OEMs while BKI is automotive brakes supplier. Thechoice of companies has also been made after careful analysis taking into consideration that thecompanies are from different countries and also there are two firms (BKI and DMV) that are inthe process of considering the implementation of a sourcing hub, one firm that is nowimplementing the Sourcing hub concept (TMV), and another firm that has already implemented it(TDV). If we look into Table 3, we can observe that there are two different flanges that are madeof the same material SS41. Hence, the information regarding all such commonalities is tapped if asourcing hub is made.
• There were also two perspectives that were taken under consideration as follows :
• Complexity perspective: Firms should gain visibility over their supply network and attempt to gain some form of control over it as it is very complex.
• Outsourcing /simplification perspective: Managing the network is complex and unrelated to the core focus of the firm, then outsourcing should be way out.
• They had made a questionnaire that tried to
gather the required information. They visited
the four companies and presented a
questionnaire to the different people who are
responsible for sourcing. The questioning is
usually preceded by an Information exchange
and an assurance for confidentiality.
Research Methodology and Results
Research Methodology and Results
• The different types of information gathered during the survey follows a sequence that can be best
described as shown:
BOM based Raw MaterialSourcing Knowledge:
1. Creation and access of BOM
2. Raw material determinationand usage
3. The effect of design andquality on raw materials
RM Sourcing network:
1. Information on the majorsuppliers of these raw materials2. Probing questions onRelationship with raw materialsuppliers
Sourcing costs and financing:
1. Assessing Involvement insourcing of Raw Materials
2. Finding out the decisionsdepending on RM supply
3. Financial Aspects, workingcapital etc.
Propositions
After this information is obtained they analyze individual scenarios that can happen in a company on a
case on case basis and they make the 2 propositions taking into consideration the 2 perspectives which
were mentioned earlier. The propositions made are as follows:
Proposition A: As uncertainty increases, developing BOM‐based sourcing details of RM by working with
RM suppliers for components sourced from 1st tier suppliers can help decrease design‐, sourcing‐, and
manufacturing‐related complexity for the focal firms, the 1st tier suppliers, and the RM supplier.
Proposition B: As the number of RM suppliers decreases and the RM content in the cost of goods sold
increases, the opportunity for value addition in upstream supply chain by (i) direct purchasing of RM, (ii)
sharing demand information with 1st tier and RM suppliers, and (iii) production related information for
the focal firms, the 1st tier suppliers, and the RM supplier, increases.
Deployment of the Sourcing Hub
• The hub has sourcing individuals working full‐time on the related transactions, including logistics and negotiations
and also has the support of other departments such as finance, IT, and others who are working part time in the hub.
• There are two types of costs involved in deploying the sourcing hub-‐ startup and ongoing.
• The startup cost relates to the detailing of raw material at the component level and establishing a material database so
that the raw material supply is streamlined.
• The raw material level details at the component bill of material level are normally not a part of the day‐to‐day
operations at other OEMs.
• In order to develop such a database, the OEM has to collate accurate raw material information, such as grades,
weights and sources of material, for each component.
• The hub has sourcing individuals working full‐time on the related transactions, including logistics and negotiations
and also has the support of other departments such as finance, IT, and others who are working part time in the hub.
Research Findings and Implications to the Industry
Eliminates the Bull whip effect
The bullwhip effect can be explained as an
occurrence detected by the supply chain where orders
sent to the manufacturer and supplier create larger
variance then the sales to the end customer. These
irregular orders in the lower part of the supply chain
develop to be more distinct higher up in the supply
chain. This variance can interrupt the smoothness of
the supply chain process as each link in the supply
chain will over or underestimate the product demand
resulting in exaggerated fluctuations.
Research Findings and Implications to the Industry
• The information obtained via survey is used for
detailing the upstream Raw Material sourcing
network, including all suppliers' suppliers.
• This information is shared to these stakeholders
about current and immediate future production,
about market demand, and new products.
• This is a major step in trying to eliminate the Bull
whip effect which may arise out of Information
asymmetry.
Collaborative design
• To start with, there would be interaction with the design and technical departments for sharingknowledge on available technologies and Raw Material available from suppliers in order to helpimprove design and development of current and new products.
• This leads to collaborative design so that the suppliers know what kind of materials to procure andstore.
• At the same time the OEMs can leverage upon the knowledge of the suppliers to understand the rightkind of material needed for any application.
• It also provides vital information while entering new markets.
• Suppose a material needs some processing to be done, then the supplier can schedule can processaccordingly. This gives rise to Concurrent Engineering.
• Here by direct sourcing from the Raw materials the intermediate costs of the immediate suppliers iseliminated thereby bringing about cost savings.
Reducing Ordering Costs
• We all know that Economic Order Quantity is =
√(2DS/H). So the EOQ can be brought down by
reducing the value of the ordering cost.
• In its sourcing hub, TDV manages complete
transactions for RM sourcing via an online
web‐based system.
• Hence this type of a system though different from an
e- procurement system would help in bringing down
the ordering costs considerably.
Single Supplier Concept
• As we can see this concept of sourcing hub would
bring about the optimization of network of suppliers
thereby reducing the dependency on suppliers. If we
look into table 5, we can observe since the sourcing
Hub is implemented, though there are 23 different
suppliers, there is only one raw material supplier.
Limitations of this Research
Restriction to Automobile Industries:
• This research is restricted only to Automobile
Industries and hence the suitability of this concept
for other industries cannot be justified. For example
in Industries which have Job Shop production, every
job is a new variety and hence optimizing the
requirement of Raw Materials is difficult.
Limitations of this Research
Increased dependency:
In this case becoming increasingly dependent on one Raw material
supplier would put the firm in a tough spot because of the following
two reasons:
• 1. The Firm may be in financial trouble or may not be able to
supply goods due to some calamity.
• 2. The firm may place restrictions or become demanding as it is
the sole supplier or one among the few suppliers for the OEM.
Limitations of this Research
Transfer of Technology:
• Working closely to the OEM makes the supplier come to know
about technologies /processes that may be strategic or critical to
the company in which case there may be a breach of trust or the
Raw material supplier can come up as a new competitor.
Limitations of this Research
Imported Components/Cycle time:
• In defense and space applications, there are some specific
requirements of the process which requires greater precision and
hence they are imported. This concept cannot be tried in those
cases. Also the cycle time must be considered and if purchasing
the parts is economic, we should go for purchasing them directly.