SUMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE QUESTIONNAIRES

CARRIED OUT IN BZB KREFELD

Krefeld, January 2015

Intended and achieved questionnaires

Results of questionnaire Nr. 1 (students)

Remarks about questionnaire Nr. 1

In general, students find the materials interesting, but not new. They also find them difficult to apply and complicated to unterstand the methodology.

Both video material and learning material on the website are difficult to find for most of the students.

Although the majority found the materials interesting, they would not recommend it because the contents are known by everyone, and the goals and the website unclear.

Results of questionnaire Nr. 2 (short version)

Remarks about questionnaire Nr. 2 (short version)

Without reading/having the complete work package version, it was quite difficult for the survey respondents to understand and follow the meaning of the project and the survey.

After having been explained how the questionnaire works

and what is the project about, we found out that some of the survey respondents did not know how to answer the questionnaires due to lack of clarity. They just leave some sections blank.

Most of the survey respondents agree that the drafts of INCOM-VET project works do not correspond to the level of intercultural competences training within VET institutions.

Recommendations of the survey respondentsQuestionnaire Nr. 2 (short version)

Less theory, less text.More advice about how to put the theory into practice. Some materials are outdated.Simplify the contents according to the target groups.Materials could be simpler, clearer and more

comprehensible.Simplify the contents according to the target groups.Quality before quantity.

Results of questionnaire Nr. 3 (long version)

Results of questionnaire Nr. 3 (long version)

Results of questionnaire Nr. 3 (long version)

Remarks about questionnaire Nr. 3

The survey respondent finds that the materials and the examples are very good, but could be more appealing.

The survey respondent points out several times that the work packages are, especially WP1 & WP3, too theoretical and too long for VET students in construction field.

The survey respondent suggests improvements in the structure of the work packages, especially in WP1 and WP2. WP1 is not appealing enough because of the form/design and the structure.

Survey respondent has sometimes problems to understand the questions of the questionnaire in connection with the WPs.