SULFRAD-Stockholm- Conductivity Time-resolved Conductivity in Pulse Radiolysis Time-resolved...
-
Upload
piers-casey -
Category
Documents
-
view
232 -
download
1
Transcript of SULFRAD-Stockholm- Conductivity Time-resolved Conductivity in Pulse Radiolysis Time-resolved...
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Time-resolved Conductivity in
Pulse Radiolysis
Time-resolved Conductivity in
Pulse Radiolysis
Klaus-Dieter AsmusKlaus-Dieter Asmus Klaus-Dieter AsmusKlaus-Dieter Asmus
RR••
cell
pulse of high-energy electrons
monochromator
amplifier
x-y recordertime
conductivity cell
Va
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Application of conductivity Application of conductivity
• / • no optical absorption
• / • in general, conductivity provides an additional, independent parameter in mechanistic studies
H• + CCl4 H+ + Cl– + •CCl3
• / • yield of absorbing species is not known
•OH + RSSR (RSSR)•+ + OH–
RS• + RSOH
RSH + RSO•
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
general requirements general requirements
applied voltage Va --- must not interfere with radiation chemical „geminate“ or other ion recombination process
--- must not itself result in ion formation
Ohm‘s law applies under all conditions
only a negligible part of the ions produced / destroyed / altered as a result of the irradiation are collected at the electrodes
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Any change in concentration of charged species changes the
conductance of the irradiated solution in the irradiation cell.
The associated change in current manifests itself in a
voltage change,
and this is the actually measured parameter.
What is measured ?
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Gc conductance
RL load resistorvoltage divider stringvoltage divider string
cell
e-beam Gc + Gc(t)
VL,0 + VL(t)
Va
RL
Gc(t) causes VL(t) Gc(t) causes VL(t) SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Gc conductance
RL load resistorvoltage divider stringvoltage divider string
e-beam
Gc + Gc(t)
VL,0 + VL(t)
Va
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
I
I
I
I
I = current
RL
some mathematical correlations:
VL(t) = Gc(t) • Va • RL
G ~ 1 / R G ~ 1 / R
conditions of operations:
Rcell >> RL Gcell << GL Gcell(t) << GL and
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
VL(t) = Gc(t) • Va • RL
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
in aqueous solution:
Gc(t)F
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
F 1cm2
1
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
kc : cell constant
F : Faraday constant
ci : concentration of ith ion
zi : net charge of ith ion
i : mobility of ith ion [cm2 V–1 s–1]
i : specific conductivity of ith ion
=
Gc(t) =
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
application of voltage causes polarization and eventually electrolysisapplication of voltage causes polarization and eventually electrolysis
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
•/• polarization induces a Helmholtz layer operating against the voltage
•/• too low voltage reduces sensitivity below detection limit
•/• too high voltage may cause electrolysiselectrolysis changes chemical composition, and neutralizes charges
•/• too high voltage may effect geminate and other ion recombinaion processes
typical voltages applied: 20 – 200 Vtypical voltages applied: 20 – 200 V
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
application of voltage causes polarization and eventually electrolysisapplication of voltage causes polarization and eventually electrolysis
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
damage control
pulsed DC voltage (triggered by the pulse)
especially good for long-time measurements (>1 s)
AC voltage
time resolution limited by frequency
electronically more difficult to handle
VL(t) signals must be rectified and recorded at same phase position
capacitance effects at higher frequencies
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
load resistor RL must remain small (<<) compared to Rc ( = 1 / Gc)
typically < 200
cell constant kc d / A d : distance between electrodesA : area of electrodes
typically < 0.5 – 1.0
change of charge zi
typically ± 1.0
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
change in concentrationchange in concentration typically 10–6 – 10–5 M
specific conductivity
specific conductivity
Haq+ 315 –1 cm2 (S cm2) at 18°C
OHaq– 176
F– 46.5
NO3– 61.7
Na+ 43.5
NH4+ 64.5
typical anion (A–) or cation (Kat+) 50 20
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
VL(t) =Va • RL
kc • 103 i
ci | zi | i
typical conditions: Va = 100 V
RL = 50
kc = 0.8
| zi | = 1
VL(t) = 0.5 m V
sensitivity
Example I:
i = 380 S cm2 (315 +
65)
H• + CCl4 H+ + Cl– + •CCl3
ci = 2.1 • 10–7 M
Example II:
i = 10 S cm2
Tl+ + •OH Tl(OH)+
ci = 8.0 • 10–6 M
What is possible these days ?
time windowtime window 2-5 ns 20 – 50 s DC
1 s 100 ms AC
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
detectable ion pair concentration changesdetectable ion pair concentration changes
10–6 - 10–7 M10–6 - 10–7 M
conversion of one ion into another ion
conversion of one ion into another ion
H+ / anion(–) pairH+ / anion(–) pair
Water radiolysis
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
formation of conducting species:formation of conducting species:
H2O radiolyisradiolyis
eaq– , H+ , •OH , H• , H2 , H2O2
0 50 s
720 nm
cond.
consumption of conducting species:consumption of conducting species:
eaq– + H+ H•
eaq– + H2O H• / ½ H2 + OH–
OH– + H+ H2O
no conducting species remains
specific conductance of eaq–
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
basic solution; pH 9
basic solution; pH 9
0 100 s
720 nm
cond.
pulseeaq
– + H2O H• / ½ H2 + OH–
H2O eaq– + H+
OH– + H+ H2O
fast
fast
formation of eaq– is accompanied by
an instantaneous loss of an OH–
as eaq– decays it is replaced by an OH–
Since there is almost no net signal change,
(eaq–) must be about the same as (OH–)
(OH–) = 176 S cm2
(eaq–) = 183 ± 10 S cm2
H+ + OH– neutralization
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
k (H+ + OH–) 1.1 • 1011 M–1 s–1
N2O-saturated, pH = 4.6N2O-saturated, pH = 4.6
t1/2 260 ns
neutralization becomes of pseudo-first order[OH–] = 3 • 10–6 M
[H+] = 2.5 • 10–5 M
eaq– + N2O •OH + N2 + OH–
H2O eaq– + H+
t1/2 3.5 ns
(RSSR)•+ radical cations
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
N2O-saturated solutions of CH3SSCH3 N2O-saturated solutions of CH3SSCH3
= 0eaq– + N2O •OH + N2 + OH–
H+ + OH– H2O
H2O eaq– + H+
pH 8.05
pH 4.75RSOH + RS•
•OH + RSSR (RSSR)•+ + OH–
RSH + RSO•
basic solution: OH– stable
increase in conductivity
acid solution: instantaneous neutralization of OH–
replacement of H+ (315 S cm2) by less conducting (RSSR)•+ ( 50 S cm2)
ca 50% of •OH yield (RSSR)•+ca 50% of •OH yield (RSSR)•+
•OH reaction with t-Bu2S
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
N2O-saturated solutions of t-Bu2S ; pH 3.3 N2O-saturated solutions of t-Bu2S ; pH 3.3
370 nm
•OH + t-Bu2S t-Bu2S•(OH)
Q: Is the presumed sulfuranyl radical intermediate neutral or charged (protonated or deprotonated) ?
t-Bu2S•(OH) (t-Bu2S)•+ + OH–
H+ + OH– H2O
A: Under experimental conditions the sulfuranyl radical intermediate is a neutral species which later decays into the radical cation / OH– ion pair
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
•OH reaction with sulfoxides
N2O-saturated solutions of (CH3)2SO N2O-saturated solutions of (CH3)2SO
•OH + (CH3)2SO •CH3 + CH3SO2H
CH3SO2– + H+ acidic solution:
H+ + OH– H2Obasic solution:
Net result in basic solution:
OH– (176 S cm2) is replaced by the less conducting CH3SO2– (42 S cm2)
pH 4.4
pH 9.0
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
Decarboxylation of methionine and hydrolysis of CO2
N2O-saturated solutions of methionine / pH 11 N2O-saturated solutions of methionine / pH 11
pH 10.8
pH 11.0CO2 + OH– HCO3
–
HCO3–
+ OH– CO32– + H2O
k = 8.5 • 103 M–1 s–1
•OH + CH3SCH2CH2CH(NH2)CO2– + OH–
NS
OH H
H
CO2
NS
H
H
CO2
+
CO2 + CH3SCH2CH2C•NH2
k 1011 s–1
SULFRAD-Stockholm-ConductivitySULFRAD-Stockholm-Conductivity
The time-resolved conductivity technique is more complex than the corresponding optical detection technique
The time-resolved conductivity technique is more complex than the corresponding optical detection technique
It involves more electronic and electrical parameters
Any signal is based on contributions of at least two ions
In water the major contributors are H+ and OH–, and not necessarily the ions of interest
Nevertheless, time-resolved conductivity excellently complements optical detection and provides information
otherwise not accessible
Nevertheless, time-resolved conductivity excellently complements optical detection and provides information
otherwise not accessible