Submission to the Department of Health and Childrennda.ie/Image-Library/PDF-Downloads/MS-Word-Format...
Transcript of Submission to the Department of Health and Childrennda.ie/Image-Library/PDF-Downloads/MS-Word-Format...
Submission to the Department of Health and Children
Strategic Review of Disability Services
30 September 2005
Page 1 of 54
Part 1: Introduction..............................................................................................................4
NDA statutory remit..........................................................................................................4
Health inequalities............................................................................................................5
Scope............................................................................................................................... 6
Models of disability...........................................................................................................6
Principles and values........................................................................................................7
Part 2: Overarching Issues..................................................................................................9
Life course approach........................................................................................................9
Mainstreaming and Specialist Services..........................................................................11
Integration and Co-ordination.........................................................................................13
Participation and consultation.........................................................................................15
Disability and equality proofing.......................................................................................17
Data Collection...............................................................................................................18
Research agenda...........................................................................................................25
Standards.......................................................................................................................27
Accessibility....................................................................................................................28
Advocacy........................................................................................................................29
Challenging and influencing attitudes in Irish society.....................................................31
Part 3: Organisation and Delivery of Services...................................................................32
Stakeholders...................................................................................................................32
Community based provision...........................................................................................40
Page 2 of 54
Independent needs assessment.....................................................................................41
Person-Centred Planning...............................................................................................42
Information......................................................................................................................44
Protecting vulnerable adults...........................................................................................44
Pharmacy.......................................................................................................................45
Evaluation, monitoring and review..................................................................................47
Part 4: Funding and Resource Allocation..........................................................................48
Principles that should inform funding of services............................................................50
Part 5: Conclusion.............................................................................................................51
Appendices........................................................................................................................52
I References..............................................................................................................52
Page 3 of 54
Part 1: Introduction The National Disability Authority (NDA) welcomes this opportunity to present
this submission on the Department of Health and Children’s Strategic Review
of Disability Services. The NDA notes that the Strategic Review is fulfilment of
a Government commitment under social partnership.
The NDA considers that the review is timely in the context of the publication of
the National Disability Strategy (2004), the enactment of the Disability Act
2005, the Department’s preparation of its sectoral plan, and the anticipated
consideration of the Comhairle (Amendment) Bill 2004 during the next
parliamentary session. The multi-annual investment package component of
the NDS will have significant impact on implementation of recommendations
by the Strategic Review
The NDA notes that the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy will report
before year end. It considers it essential that these two significant policy
developments effecting the lives of people with disabilities are considered in
an integrated and co-ordinated manner by the Department in terms of future
policy work within the Department, statutory agencies under its aegis and
funded non-statutory organisations.
NDA statutory remit The National Disability Authority was established in June 2000 as an
independent statutory body operating under the aegis of the Department of
Justice, Equality and Law Reform. The National Disability Authority Act, 1999,
defines the principal function of the Authority as “to advise the Minister and
keep him or her informed of developments in relation to any disability of
persons which concern issues of policy and practice”. It has statutory remits in
the areas of policy, research and standards under the National Disability
Authority Act 1999 and additional functions under the Disability Act 2005.
Page 4 of 54
The Mission of the NDA is, on behalf of the State, to promote and help secure
the rights of people with disabilities. The Authority aims to achieve this by:
influencing public policy and legislation
ensuring that services to people with disabilities are of the highest
standards and quality.
In this introduction the NDA firstly considers the significance of health within
the lives of people with disabilities and barriers, which they experience in
accessing health care and fulfilling their full health potential. It goes on to
briefly explore the social and human rights model of disability and the
principles and values , which underpin its work and which it considers could
inform the Strategic Review.
Health inequalities Health is of central importance to the lives of people with disabilities. The
health and well-being of people with disabilities is intricately linked to their
ability to participate fully in the economic, social and cultural life of the nation.
The NDA’s publication on health inequalities in access and using mainstream
health services1 highlights the substantial and wide-ranging health impacts of
disability. These include (i) greater risk as a consequence of having a reduced
income due to exclusion from the labour force and being caught in the
‘benefits trap’, (ii) the additional costs of being disabled, (iii) increased
incidence of other disabling conditions and illnesses, (iv) lack of access to
acute, rehabilitative and population health services, (v) experience of a range
of barriers to accessing care (financial, physical, organisational, transport,
communication, informational including the inadequate knowledge of health
care providers and attitudinal), (vi) experience of un-coordinated and
fragmented provision, exacerbated by the involvement of multiple health and
1 The experiences of people with disabilities in accessing health services in Ireland: Do inequalities exist? (2005)
Page 5 of 54
social providers and (vii) limited provision due to the focus of health services
being on the individual’s impairment rather than the health issue or condition.
Scope The Strategic Review is taking place on foot of a commitment in Sustaining
Progress: Social Partnership Agreement 2003-2005.
2.6.2 Care of People with Disabilities
The Department of Health and Children will carry out a strategic
review of existing service provision, in consultation with relevant
interests, with a view to enhancing health and personal social
services to meet the needs of people with disabilities.
With regard to the scope of the population considered in the Strategic Review,
the NDA notes that - despite the inclusion of people with experience of mental
health difficulties within the broader population group of people with
disabilities since the Report of the Commission on the Status of People with
Disabilities (1996) - the commitment in Sustaining Progress has been
interpreted by the Department of Health and Children to focus on people with
physical, sensory and intellectual disabilities.
With regard to the scope of provision, the NDA considers that it is vital that the
Strategic Review considers the interface between provision of all health and
personal social services to people with disabilities. This raises a range of
issues from procurement, estate management, funding processes and
population health, primary, secondary and tertiary provision.
Models of disability In line with Government policy, the NDA uses a social and human rights
model of disability, which recognises how social organisation creates
disabling conditions that result in social, economic, political and cultural
Page 6 of 54
exclusion. This is in keeping with the definition of disability in the National
Disability Authority Act, 1999. In the Act disability “…means a substantial
restriction in the capacity of a person to participate in the economic, social or
cultural life on account of an enduring physical, sensory, learning, mental
health or emotional impairment”.
The social model of disability locates disability within society and how society
functions and adapts to disability. The aim of the social model is to create a
society that recognises diversity and works towards inclusion and equality for
all.
Principles and valuesThe NDA is dedicated to work towards the creation of a society in which
people with disabilities have the right and opportunity to
influence and shape policy at all levels
develop and fully use their abilities, talents and skills
live learn and work in environments appropriate to their needs
live as independently as possible
enjoy equality and participation
make informed choices on issues
participate in and receive support from, national and international
organisations that effectively represent their interests
have systems of support sufficient to ensure a reasonable standard of
living in the community of their choice.
Page 7 of 54
The NDA advocates for the development of policy that is grounded in these
principles and values.
Related to these principles and values is the promotion of policy, systems and
provisions that promote self-determination2 of people with disability. Self-
determination refers to the right of individuals to have full power over their
own lives, regardless of illness or disability. It includes concepts such as free
will, civil and human rights, freedom of choice, independence, personal
agency, self-direction, and individual responsibility. Self-determination in the
context of disability services refers to individuals’ rights to direct their own
services, to make the decisions concerning their health and well-being (with
help from others of their choice, if desired) and to have meaningful leadership
roles in the design, delivery, and evaluation of services and supports.
Self-determination operates at three, interrelated levels: Individual Self-
Determination; Services, Support, and Policies that Foster Self-Determination;
and Collective, Social, or Shared Self-Determination.
In the following Parts of the submission the NDA:
identifies what it considers to be core over arching issues for the
Strategic Review
comments on the organisation and delivery of services
considers funding and resources allocation.
2 The text on self-determination draws on Self-Determination Framework for Mental Health, UIC National Research & Training Center on Psychiatric Disability (2002)
Page 8 of 54
Part 2: Overarching Issues
Life course approach Persons may be born with or acquire impairments. At different life stages they
experience differing disabling effects of society. Also, they have different
service needs and preferences. The value of early intervention at whatever
life stage an impairment occurs is well established. The NDA notes that it has
developed a number of age-specific initiatives, which could support the
development of a life course approach3 to service provision.
The NDA promotes a life course approach to provision. The life course
approach acknowledges that ageing is a process, not an event. It
accommodates the effects of ageing in individuals. It does not apply arbitrary
age cut-off points for services, but provides services appropriate to the
individual’s needs. The life course approach requires that the mode of
service provision reflects people’s age-related cultural needs.
Children and adolescents
Inclusion of the specific health needs of children and young people with
disabilities is a key element in the development of a Strategic Review of
disability services. The National Children’s Strategy (2000) calls on the
statutory agencies, the non-statutory sector and local communities to work
together to improve the quality of all children’s lives. The principles identified
to guide all actions under the Strategy are that actions be child centred, family
oriented, equitable, inclusive, action oriented and integrated.
3 Encouraging Voices: respecting the insights of young people who have been marginalized (2003); Research with children with disabilities (2005); Ageing and Disability Project with National Council for Ageing and Older People (2004 - )
Page 9 of 54
Older people
Disability affects people of all ages and increases with age. More than one-
third of people over 65 have a disability (CSO 2002). More importantly, as
people age, they are more likely to experience more than one type of
impairment. About two-thirds of disabled people aged over 65 years
experience more than one kind of disability or restriction, with the incidence of
multiple restrictions rising with age. Such statistics are initial indicators of an
emerging situation in Ireland. For example, it is projected that the prevalence
of dementia will double in the next 16 years.
Such a situation challenges the current divisions between older people’s and
disability services. For people who develop early-onset dementia, the fact
that dementia services are organised only for those over 65 means that the
services do not meet their needs. For older people, the fact that old-age
depression is not adequately recognised means their mental health needs are
not addressed. For older people who develop sensory and physical
impairments, the fact that rehabilitation is focussed on re-entry into the
workforce means that they may not receive the appropriate rehabilitation that
could enable them to continue to participate in society.
Recommendations
The NDA recommends that disability services re-orient from age-restricted,
single-impairment client groups, gate-kept by chronological age to a holistic,
life course approach to provision, supporting access to integrated, co-
ordinated services for people with disabilities throughout their life course.
The NDA recommends the development of a ‘passport’ for people with
disabilities to assist their movement through and between health services, and
also services in other sectors e.g. education, housing, social welfare,
employment and transport.
The NDA recommends the development of life course service planning, based
on independent needs assessment that delivers appropriate and adequate
Page 10 of 54
early intervention and anticipates service needs and supports integrated and
co-ordinated to ensure transition between provision at key life stages.
The NDA recommends the development of age appropriate provision e.g. day
service and residential placement, noting the specific issues for children and
young people and persons with disabilities aged 65 years and over.
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review supports the re-orientation
of mainstream age-specific provision to ensure that, as much as possible,
people with disabilities can access the same provision as their peers, with
necessary supports.
The NDA recommends the development of a research programme that
identifies policy and service provision issues for people with disabilities over
the life course and at key transition stages e.g. under-5s provision, primary,
secondary and further education level education, entry into employment, post-
65 years.
Mainstreaming and Specialist Services
Mainstreaming is a key tenet of Government policy towards people with
disabilities. The Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities
emphasised equality of opportunity so that “people with disabilities can
participate in education, employment, and all other walks of life on an equal
basis.”4 In implementing mainstreaming within an equality framework, it was
intended that all Government departments and agencies would provide
services to people with disabilities “as part of their core work.”5 The policy of
mainstreaming was affirmed by the Taoiseach in his speech launching the
NDS when he said that equal participation of people with disabilities should be
4 Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities (1996) A Strategy for Equality: Report of the Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities, Stationery Office, Dublin, p.12.5 Speech by the Taoiseach, Mr. Bertie Ahern, T.D. at the Launch of National Disability Authority, Comhairle and the Mainstreaming of Services for People with Disabilities, O’Reilly Hall, UCD, 12th June 2000.
Page 11 of 54
underpinned by “integration in the mainstream wherever possible, and
minimum segregation where necessary.”
Mainstreaming is underpinned in Section 26 of the Disability Act 2005, which
provides that where a service is provided by a public body, the provision of
access to the service by people with and without disabilities be integrated
where practicable and appropriate. The inclusion of the term ‘appropriate’
reflects an understanding that in certain situations, the individual’s needs may
be best met within a segregated setting. However, the Government’s
statement about the NDS, of which the Act forms a part, makes clear that
such situations are to be kept to a minimum, and that the emphasis should be
given to integrated provision wherever possible.
Such a policy places additional demands on mainstream services. In the
health sector mainstream services would include general health provision
such as primary care, general hospitals, public health screening programmes
and the services of health promotion departments. These demands can be
managed by three key processes:
1) Disability/Equality Proofing in all mainstream services, including
assessment criteria, to identify gaps and establish disabled access;
2) Creative co-ordination between mainstream and specialist services
to ensure effective access through mainstream settings.
3) The development of specific, measurable targets and accurate
costings for mainstreaming.
Further, mainstreaming of non-health services from the Department, statutory
agencies under its aegis and non-statutory agencies, which it funds, is a
vehicle for focussing the health system on its core business of health
provision that promotes and protects the health and well being of people with
disabilities, responds to all their health needs (not only those that are
Page 12 of 54
impairment related) in an appropriate and timely manner and improves their
health status.
In its report Requirements for a System of Independent Needs Assessment in
Ireland [2003], the NDA reviewed the current structure of provision and
identified provision, which could be mainstreamed from health to the lead
government department and its agencies. Such provision included
accommodation (Responsible Department: Environment, Heritage and Local
Government), income (Responsible Department: Social and Family Affairs),
training and employment (Responsible Department: Enterprise, Trade and
Employment), transport (Responsible Department: Transport).
Recommendations
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review promotes the realisation of
mainstreaming through specific actions, including:
Actions to mainstream from disability services and health services in
general non-health provision including accommodation, income,
training and employment and transport
Actions to mainstream from disability services health care that could be
provided through general health care.
Protocols to manage the interface between specialist and mainstream
health provision.
Support initiatives by mainstream health services to develop disability /
equality proofing mechanisms and improve access.
Integration and Co-ordination
People with disabilities and their significant others have identified difficulties in
the realisation of policy commitments to deliver integrated and co-ordinated
services. These issues include poor communication between services and
Page 13 of 54
delegation of communication and care management to people with disabilities
or their significant others, persons ‘falling between’ different Departments and
service providers, poor transition planning when people move between
services at chronological and developmental milestones, the territorialism of
service providers and failures to draw on expertise elsewhere in the health
system.
People with disabilities cannot be integrated into mainstream services and
continue to access specialist services as required without effective integration
and coordination between policy makers and service providers. The Disability
Act 2005 requires co-ordination between the Department of Health and the
Departments of Education, Social and Family Affairs, Environment, Heritage
and Local Government, and Enterprise, Trade and Employment on the
provision of services to people with disabilities. The Government has stated
that disability should be on the agenda of every Government Department and
public body. This means that protocols and procedures should be put into
place to enable both integrated policymaking and coordinated service
provision by themselves and the agencies under their remit.
Without effective leadership, coordination either fails or becomes perfunctory.
This is born out by international experience showing that effective disability
policy requires designated leadership at a high level (Pillinger 2005).
Recommendations
The NDA advocates the following key provisions for effective integration and
coordination:
Clear guidelines on coordination with other Government Departments
and with all agencies and bodies under the aegis of Departments to
address cross-cutting issues;
A clear description of the mechanisms to underpin this coordination at
different levels and how they inter-link;
Page 14 of 54
At service level, a leadership role by the HSE National Care Group
Manager; and
Regular reporting requirements by Departments and service providers
regarding the integration and coordination of health, education,
housing, transport, and social welfare provision.
Participation and consultation
The NDA is committed to consulting with persons with disabilities, their
advocates, service providers and the general public. It is essential that
consultation involving people with disabilities allows time for those consulted
to consider the issues fully. The NDA recognises that supports may be
required to ensure the equal participation of persons with disabilities. It has
developed the Ask Me guidelines on consultation and the Strategic
Partnership Guide.
People with disabilities are the experts on their own experience. The social
and human rights model of disability entails greater involvement of people
with disabilities in the decisions, which affect them. The right of people with
disabilities to influence the decisions, which impact upon them was also a key
principle of the Report of the Commission on the Status of People with
Disabilities.
Influence can come in three main forms: consultation, partnership and
participation. Consultation involves seeking a diversity of views to inform the
process of decision-making. Partnership extends beyond consultation, to
create an on-going relationship where stakeholders work together towards a
common goal. Full participation requires democratic processes that enable all
people with disabilities to have a voice in decision-making. Participation also
implies ongoing, regular engagement. In effective participatory processes,
Page 15 of 54
participants are enabled to set the agenda of issues to be considered, as well
as to contribute their views. This means that participation enables the
expansion of the agenda to consider wider issues beyond service quality.
Since the consequences of being disabled are cross-cutting issues such as
poverty, social exclusion and political disenfranchisement, it is important for
people with disabilities to have forums within which wider issues can be
addressed.
Service user involvement has been implemented in some disability services in
various ways, however what is now needed is a national policy on the
participation of people with disabilities and nationally-agreed protocols for
such involvement. The remit of a national participation structure should be
distinguished from the pre-existing Consultative and Co-ordinating
Committees, both of which have been balanced in favour of service provider
organisations rather than service user representative organisations. The
national participation structures should have regional and local strands and
should be implemented according to the following guidelines:
Recommendations
The NDA recommends
Implementing the Government’s Reaching Out and the NDA’s Ask Me guidelines for all consultation processes;
Establishing ongoing participation structures such as regular, local and
regional open forums, and democratically-selected representative
committees, from which representatives to decision-making bodies can
be drawn;
Investing in capacity-building of people with disabilities and their
representative organisations through designated funding;
Creating protocols to ensure that participation occurs throughout the
policy development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation stages;
Page 16 of 54
Incorporating equality and diversity dimensions into participation
processes by ensuring adequate representation across social groups
of gender, class, age, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, and
membership of the Traveller Community;
Creating transparent and accessible communication mechanisms; and
Creating review mechanisms to evaluate and improve participation
processes.
Disability and equality proofing
Disability / equality proofing is a systematic process for ensuring the potential
of legislation, policies and provision to promote equality is maximised and
their potential to undermine equality is minimised. Through a process of
awareness raising, audit, consultation and impact assessment6, policy makers
and service providers can identify, analyse and address positive and negative
impacts of initiatives Supporting mechanisms for realising equality competent
organisations are developed and evolving. These include equality review and
proofing templates, guidance and training, and examples of good practice
emerging. Leadership is being provided through a number of independent
statutory organisations such as the National Disability Authority and the
Equality Authority.
The NDA notes that it has undertaken a number of initiatives that would
inform the work of the Department on the needs of persons with disabilities
who are also members of communities covered by the Equality Acts 1998-
2005 including those referenced in the section on the life course approach, a
current initiative on women and disability, Disability and Sexual Orientation: a
discussion paper (2005).
Recommendations
The NDA recommends
6 NDA Disability Proofing Template for Local Government Barcelona Declaration Project 2001-2004
Page 17 of 54
The comprehensive introduction of disability / equality proofing in disability
services and across the health system.
The integration of disability / equality proofing with other proofing and impact
assessment measures in the health sector.
The progressive implementation and adequate resourcing of actions plans
issuing from disability/ equality proofing exercises, within set timeframes and
with monitoring and review mechanisms.
The equality proofing of the Strategic Review for its consideration of and
potential impacts on persons with disability under the nine grounds of the
Equality Acts 1998-2004 i.e. gender, marital status, age, disability, race,
sexual orientation, religious belief, and membership of the Traveller
community
The Department and agencies under its aegis collaborate with organisations,
which represent and work with communities covered by the nine equality
groups in the development of the Strategic Review and the implementation of
its recommendations as well as the ongoing development of disability policy
and provision
Data Collection
Demographics
Information on disability in Ireland is available through national surveys and
service usage statistics. Analysis of Irish data shows the strong association
between disability and age, with people over the age of 65 much more likely
to develop a disability than those in younger age groups. Table 1 shows the
breakdown of the disabled population in the state by age and gender, as
recorded in the most recent Census in 2002. The 136,000 people who are
aged over 65 years represent 44.3% of the total disabled population in
Ireland, with more women over the age of 65 experiencing disability than men
Page 18 of 54
unlike trends in younger age groups. This is partly accounted for by the longer
life expectancy of women.
Table 1: Numbers of disabled people, by age group and genderCensus 2002, rounded
Age M F
0-19 16,000 10,000
20-64 84,000 78,000
65+ 52,000 84,000
Total 152,000 172,000
The link between disability and ageing also reflects the fact that most disability
is acquired. The Quarterly National Household Survey (QNHS) included a
special disability module in 2002 that contained a specific question on the
length of time the ‘longstanding health problem or disability’ had existed. Of
the 271,000 persons between the ages of 15 and 64 that were recorded as
disabled on the basis of the questions used in this survey, 40,500 people or
14.9% stated that they had had the disability since birth. As persons over the
age of 65 were not included in the study, the true figure of acquired disabilities
among the entire population is likely to be much higher than the 85.1%
indicated in the above data.
Disability data is also available from two national disability databases
maintained by the Health Research Board. These are the National Intellectual
Disability Database (NIDD) and the National Physical and Sensory Disability
Database (NPSDD). Both provide a profile of people with the specific
Page 19 of 54
categories of disability who are receiving specialised health and personal
social services or who are waiting for these services and are used as planning
tools. The NIDD had over 25,000 registrations in 2004. Table 2 shows the
breakdown of all registered users by age and gender. Of all registered
persons on the NIDD, 34.2% are under 19, 55.4% are between the ages of 20
and 55 and 10.5% are over 55 years of age.
Table 2: Number of registrations on NIDD, by age group and gender
Age M F
0-19 5,325 3,355
20-54 7,660 6,403
55+ 1,261 1,412
Total 14,246 11,170
There are currently just over 20,000 people registered on the NPSDD. Thirty
three per cent of all registrations are below the age of 18, 54.8% of people are
between the ages of 18 and 59 years and 12.6% are between the ages of 60
and 65 (National Physical and Sensory Disability Database Committee, 2004).
The number of registered females is greater than males in all categories with
the exception among registered service users under the age of 25. However,
its main limitation is that data is only collected for service users who began
their usage before the age of 66, therefore limiting its capacity to provide us
with data on the service usage of older people with physical impairments.
Analysis of data on specific health conditions and impairments also confirms
the strong association between disability and ageing. Prevalence of
cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and other diseases increases
Page 20 of 54
significantly with age. By 2020, heart disease and stroke will become the
leading cause of death and disability worldwide (Atlas of Heart Disease and
Strike, WHO, 2004). Irish prevalence data for cardiovascular conditions is
limited to hospitalisation rates for public hospitals recorded in the Hospital In-
Patient Enquiry (HIPE) Database. Nevertheless, it shows that approximately
25% of all male hospitalisations and 7.5% of all female hospitalisations among
those between the ages of 55 and 59 years are as a result of either ischaemic
heart disease (ISD) or acute myocardial infraction (AMI), two of the most
common cardiovascular conditions. However, among those in the 65-69 and
70-74 age groups, the rate of all hospitalisations in these categories
accounted for by both conditions increased to approximately 33.5% and
34.5% respectively for men and 16% and 18% for women (Irish Heart
Foundation, 2001).
Although significant declines in mortality rates have occurred in recent
decades, increased numbers of people are forced to cope with the daily
realities associated with the condition, most of them elderly. The disability that
is caused by CVD indicates a substantial number of older people who are
likely to require continued monitoring and treatment after experience of
serious conditions such as heart and stroke.
It is estimated that the population aged over 65 could also increase from its
present level of 436,000 to about 1 million in the next thirty years. The
population aged eighty years and over is projected to increase three-fold in
the same period, to over 300,000 (Punch 2005). When considered in
conjunction with the disability data noted above, these demographic changes
will have important implications for the provision of disability services in
Ireland in the future.
Page 21 of 54
Service: operational and clinical
The development of an independent needs assessment system poses certain
challenges for the current database infrastructure held within the Health
Research Board. While the independent needs assessment process outlined
within the Disability Act 2005 will provide INA for those who fall within the
definition of disability contained within the Act, the national databases provide
an infrastructure for planning for the service needs for the broad range of
people with disabilities in Ireland.
The National Intellectual Disability Database has been a key planning tool for
the development of services for those with intellectual disabilities in Ireland.
While participation in the National Physical and Sensory Disability Database
has been uneven nationally, the strong uptake in certain health service areas
suggests that it too can be a useful tool in planning and targeting services
more effectively. However, while both tools have their distinct strengths,
neither tool would, as currently implemented, satisfy the requirements of a
statutory needs assessment as described in the Disability Act 2005. The
NPSDD is largely a self assessment, reported to trained personnel. The
NIDD while a clinical assessment, does not currently satisfy the definition of
independent. It will be critical to develop a system, which is coherent with the
provisions of the Disability Act, even if that means ceasing to operate either or
both of the current databases in lieu of a more robust system.
Contact with the databases differs between population groups; contact with
the NIDD is often the result of referral from maternity hospital, G.P. public
health nurse or other health professional. Contact with the NSPDD is often all
of those sources, but there are a greater number of those who are self
referred on the NSPDD than the NIDD. Owing to the nature and timeliness of
diagnosis, distinct referral pathways are to be expected; however, it is
important to ensure rigorous monitoring of assessment protocols to ensure
data obtained is of the highest quality. NDA is concerned that lack of
Page 22 of 54
resources in some health executive areas has resulted in a leniency on
adherence to protocol for the NSPDD in particular.
The databases are only effective as planning tools if the resources allocated
are aligned with need. NDA is concerned that significant investment in
services in the past five years has not resulted in the development of the
expected services; the absence of clear costings and standards for services is
at the heart of this discrepancy. While funds are allocated to cover such
services as residential places, day places and respite services, lack of
agreement between the funding body and the providing body as to the costs
of such services results in this disconnect and ultimate concern over
expenditure. Clear agreement as to the actual cost of such services and the
full description of what such costs are to provide for is necessary.
The national information systems are as follows:
National Intellectual Disability Database (established in 1995),
National Physical and Sensory Disability Database (commenced national
implementation in 2002),
The Occupational Guidance Service (Rehabilitative Training and Sheltered
Workshop Services) Database
There is no national database attempting to capture service provision needs
of those with mental health difficulties or for those over the age of 65 years.
However, the vast majority of disability is acquired in the years over 60 and
the World Health Organisation estimates that twenty five per cent of
populations in both developed and developing will experience depression or
other mental health or behavioural difficulties at some stage in their lives
(World Health Organisation, Mental and Neurological Conditions Factsheet,
2001). Furthermore, individuals do not fit easily in one category of need or
Page 23 of 54
another; the elderly, the young person with a physical impairment, and those
with intellectual disabilities can clearly experience mental health difficulties. A
comprehensive planning tool to anticipate and provide for this complex array
of needs is urgently required.
Classification System
In keeping with NDA’s contribution to the Information and Databases
Specialist Study Group, NDA sees disability as a multi-dimensional
phenomenon arising out of an interaction between the individual’s health
status and the physical and social environment. Disability data, and the
instruments to measure them, must reflect this bio-psychosocial model of
disability. Valid and reliable information are essential to design, implement, or
evaluate policies and legislation to combat discrimination, promote social
integration and participation, and enhance opportunities. The World Health
Organisation’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
(ICF) provides the framework for documenting the interaction between health
status and environmental features, and the differential distribution of disability
among different groups in different contexts.
ICF has been endorsed by 191 countries, including all European Member
states, as the internationally accepted framework that should govern data
collection efforts with regard to disability and health. It is a member of the
WHO family of international classifications, including in particular the
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health
Problems (ICD-10). These classifications are the principal source of
international standards for health and disability. In this role, ICF itself
constitutes an international standard of significant importance both to disability
policy experts and governmental agencies, and to persons with disabilities
themselves.
Page 24 of 54
Recommendation
NDA endorses the recommendation of the Information and Databases
Specialist Study Group which states:
All future development of data gathering/survey instruments should be firmly
grounded in the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of
Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
Research agenda
Research Priorities
In line with our vision outlined earlier in this document, the NDA t is committed
to research from a social model framework and to the fundamental principles
of participation and empowerment of people with disabilities in our research
programme. To this end, the NDA Research Unit has issued a number of
guidance documents.7 It is our aim to establish a national Disability Research
Ethics Advisory Committee to review disability research proposals and make
recommendations against the guidelines.
Current Research Activities in NDA of Relevance to the Strategic Review
National Disability Study
In October 2004 the government announced its approval for the
implementation of the first ever National Disability Survey to be conducted by
the Central Statistics Office following the Census of 2006. The purpose of the
national disability study is to establish a comprehensive estimate of the
prevalence of disability in Ireland, to gather and analyse both appropriate
statistics and qualitative data and to present a comprehensive picture of
disabled people’s experience of participation in, or exclusion from, all aspects
of Irish life. We recommend that both adults and children with disabilities be
included.
7 Guidelines for the Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Research (2002), Guidelines on Research with Children with Disabilities, Ethical Guidelines for Disability Research (NDA, 2004).
Page 25 of 54
The NDA believes that the findings of this study will assist a wide range of
government departments and other agencies in the planning and
development of relevant policies and of specialised and mainstream services
for people with disabilities.
It has been agreed that the framework to be used in the National Disability
Survey will be the WHO International Classification of Health and Functioning
discussed earlier. The NDA is working closely with the Central Statistics
Office in the development of the survey questionnaire.
Other recent/current relevant research initiatives include
Recently published research into inequalities in access to mainstream
health services and identifying mechanisms to facilitate access to care;
Recently published research entitled ‘Disability and Social Inclusion’
jointly commissioned with the Equality Authority
Soon to be published national study of the levels of and barriers to
physical activity and sport among people with disabilities in Ireland
Promotion of Applied Research on Disability and Health partnership
with HRB
Ongoing study into the experience of abuse of people with disabilities
Current review of literature on women and disability
Future NDA research priorities in the health field include:
Research to understand better the relationship between health inequalities
and disability: what works to reduce inequalities between the disabled and
non-disabled population;
Page 26 of 54
Research into health promotion priorities for people with disabilities in Ireland
and the effectiveness of current health promotion interventions;
Research into quality of life indicators for people with disabilities in order to
monitor effectiveness of services and other interventions, and identify
appropriate policy responses;
Research to identify effective population-level interventions for preventing
mental health problems. Related to this is our priority for research into the
relationship between social capital, health and mental health well being;
Research to identify interventions to improve the quality of interventions,
particularly at primary care level, incorporating an understanding of social
exclusion on service user needs and care delivery;
Research into the cost effectiveness of interventions provided across the
whole service system, from specialist services to community based
mainstream and home support interventions;
Research into effective strategies for supporting carers in their roles and
promoting the mental well being of carers;
Research into appropriate strategies/interventions to identify mental health
problems in people with learning difficulties, the risk/protective factors, and
management there of in the community at residential care level;
Standards
In June 2002 the NDA formally proposed the development of National
Standards for Disability Services to the Department of Health and Children.
Since then, the NDA and the Department have actively worked in partnership
on this project which eventually resulted in the NDA forwarding the standards
for approval by the Minister of Health and Children in October 2004. In the
current Social Partnership Agreement 2003-2005 ‘Sustaining Progress’, the
Government expressed its commitment to complete the development of these
standards.
Page 27 of 54
Undoubtedly the Department is aware that the non capital expenditure on
health related services developed specifically to meet the needs of people
with different types of disability (excluding mental health services) is now over
€1.2 billion per annum (Department of Finance, 2004). More than 25,000
people with an intellectual disability and 40,000 people with physical and
sensory disabilities avail of these services (Health Research Board, 2002 and
2004).
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the National Standards for Disability Services are
implemented as soon as possible, in line with the recently published HSE
Service Plan which identifies 'compliance with the National Standards for
Disability Services' as one of the three key issues for disability services in
2005.
Accessibility
Access is crucial to the inclusion of people with disabilities. Accessibility
means all measures necessary to ensure people with disabilities can equally
participate in society, as well as enter and make use of a place, a good or a
service. The NDA view is informed by reference to the ISO TS 16071
definition of accessibility as ‘the usability of a product, service, environment or
facility by people with the widest range of capabilities’. This includes physical,
communication and information access.
Achieving the highest level of accessibility in the public service has been a
stated commitment of Government policy since the Programme for Prosperity
and Fairness Social Partnership Agreement (PPF). Under the PPF, the NDA
has been given the task to develop guidelines and to monitor progress in the
Page 28 of 54
achievement of improved accessible public services and to award an
accessibility symbol to compliant public services (the Excellence through
Accessibility Award Scheme).
Recommendations
The NDA recommends that the Department aims to achieve the highest level
of accessibility for itself as well as statutory agencies under its aegis by
participating in the Excellence through Accessibility Award Scheme.
The NDA recommends that the Department ensures full compliance with the
Disability Act including compliance with statutory codes of practice in the area
of accessibility and positive action measure for the employment of people with
disabilities.
Advocacy
The Irish Government has accepted the need for advocacy for and by people
with disabilities through the Comhairle Act 2000 and the inclusion of the
Comhairle (Amendment) Bill 2004 as part of its NDS. The NDA stresses the
importance of legislative, policy and service measures to ensure effective
access to advocacy by all people with disabilities.
The NDA believes that advocacy work should aspire to empower all
individuals and groups to advocate on their own behalf, whilst also ensuring
that people can choose their preferred type of advocacy provision. This
requires investment to effectively resource advocacy provision.
The NDA notes that there are a range of types of advocacy:
legal advocacy – representation by legally qualified advocates, usually
solicitors, on behalf of people with disabilities;
independent patient advocacy – provided by an independent,
professional advocacy service;
Page 29 of 54
citizen advocacy – a long-term one-to-one partnership between a
service user and an advocate. (This model has developed in response
to the needs of people with intellectual disabilities);
Peer advocacy – provided by people who have themselves been, or
from time-to-time are themselves, users of the service;
Self-advocacy – people speaking out for themselves.
Recommendations
Drawing on research by Comhairle (2003), the NDA recommends the
following guidelines for implementation:
Guaranteed statutory funding: funding should be provided on a
contractual, partnership basis with specified protection for the
autonomy of the service from the funder and/or service provider
agency.
Independence – the advocate must be visibly and substantially
independent from the service. This means that the independent
advocacy service should be established as an entity independent of
any government department and the service in which he or she is
working.
Choice in advocacy services - the individual should be able to choose
whether or not to avail of advocacy. The individual should also be able
to choose between a range of types of advocacy as described above,
advocacy providers, and individual advocates. This will require
substantial investment. However, without such choice, there is a risk
that the individual’s rights will not be effectively represented. Lack of
choice could also result in the abuse of people with disabilities by
advocates.
Page 30 of 54
Standardised, accredited training should be required for all people
acting as advocates. This training should include not only the
principles of good practice in advocacy, but also Disability/Equality
awareness training.
The performance of advocates and their parent organisations should
operate within a national regulatory framework and be monitored
against agreed standards.
All staff providing services to people with disabilities should be trained
to create a positive environment for advocacy, to facilitate access to
advocacy by people with disabilities, and to work in partnership with
people with disabilities and their advocates.
Users should at all times have access to an effective complaints
mechanism regarding advocacy services.
The NDA also recognises that advocacy services should be available to
support carers and family members.
Challenging and influencing attitudes in Irish society
The Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities identified cultural
images portrayed for example in the media and the presence or absence of
education about a particular group aimed at combating prejudicial and
discriminatory attitudes as two principle determinants of the status of people
with disabilities. NDA has prioritised work on attitudes by stating that one of its
strategic priorities is the informing and influencing of attitudes in Irish society.
In 2002 the NDA published a baseline survey on attitudes towards people with
disabilities. The summary findings provided data on public attitudes regarding
what constitutes disability, perceived prevalence of disability in Ireland,
fairness of treatment of people with disabilities, participation of people with
disabilities in education and employment definition of disability, difficulties
experienced by people with disabilities, their rights and fulfillment with regard
Page 31 of 54
to relationships and sexuality and children, people without disabilities’ comfort
with people with disabilities, caring and state benefits. Subsequent research
on public attitudes towards people with disabilities provides further useful
evidence. The NDA notes that it is developing Guidelines for Purchasers of
Disability Equality Training.
Recommendations
The NDA recommends that the Strategic review addresses the issue of
attitudes towards people with disabilities by:
Promoting comprehensive and ongoing disability / equality awareness
training for all staff within the Department of Health and Children and
statutory agencies under its aegis
Recommending the development of nationally co-ordinated, inter-
sectoral initiatives to promote positive attitudes towards people with
disabilities amongst the public.
Part 3: Organisation and Delivery of Services
Stakeholders
The NDA acknowledges the multiplicity and diversity of stakeholders in
disability services, which may expand as community based and mainstream
provision is developed. As outlined above the NDA advocates for consultation
with, participation of and partnership with all stakeholders.
The NDA notes the the World Health Organisation’s Health 21 – health for all
in the 21st century includes Target 20 – Mobilizing partners for health:
By the year 2005, implementation of policies for health for all
should engage individuals, groups and organizations throughout
Page 32 of 54
the public and private sectors, and civil society, in alliances and
partnerships for health.
In particular:
20.1 the health sector should engage in active promotion and
advocacy for health, encouraging other sectors to join in multi-
sectoral activities and share goals and resources;
20.2 structures and processes should exist at international,
country, regional and local levels to facilitate harmonized
collaboration of all actors and sectors in health development.
[1999:200]
In this submission, the NDA considers the following stakeholders:
people with disabilities
significant others (families, friends and carers)
workers
community.
People with disabilities
A key aspect of service quality is the enhanced role given to service users,
through participation in the planning and monitoring of services and the
development of empowerment and independence as guiding principles in
service delivery. There are welcome changes in the area of user involvement
and participation with the
Growing representation of service users on decision-making bodies
Involvement of service users in the planning, organisation, delivery and
monitoring of services and
Page 33 of 54
Development of peer provided services.
This submission primarily addresses the Strategic Review regarding the
experiences of people with disabilities. Therefore, in this section greater
attention is given to other stakeholder groups.
Recommendation
The Strategic Review should be completed with the full inclusion of people
with disabilities and subsequent policy, provision and practice both as users of
services and contributors to strategic development. Their expertise should be
given equal value to other stakeholders and they should be supported to take
leadership in disability services.
Significant Others
A significant other is a person who has a supportive relationship with the
disabled person. This may include a family member, friend, community
member or someone in an informal caring relationship with the person.
Carers are key stakeholders in disability services, both at individual and
strategic levels. They are important sources of support for people with
disabilities. However they need to be adequately supported. The NDA
considers that the rights and contributions of carers are often not recognised
and the impact of caring upon their other familial and social relationships,
mental health and quality of life as well as income are not recognised.
Significant others have expressed their sense of not having a voice in
disability services and that their expressed views have little and rarely lasting
Page 34 of 54
impact. They have also details the negative personal impact of the caring role
and engagement with disability services. lack of personal and family time,
exhaustion, poor quality familial relationships, stress with current situations
and anxiety anticipating what may happen to the person with a disability when
they are no longer able to care, advocate, monitor. Negative impacts can be
caused by service orientations, specifically where significant others
experience services as a) blaming e.g. deficits in parenting, b) services
taking away control, c) services not valuing their expertise or recognising their
knowledge of innovative treatments, d) planning taking place without their
input.
Recommendations
The NDA recommends the development of a national strategy for carers of
people with disabilities.
The NDA recommends research on the impact of caring upon the family and
social relationships, mental health and quality of life to determine the needs of
carers.
The NDA recommends the development of respite care services, which are
appropriate and responsive to family needs.
The NDA recommends the development of services in a comprehensive
manner so that carers are not forced to assume an unsustainable level of
care.
The NDA recommends that significant others should
be consulted on the development and delivery of services, and through
such consultation additional support services should be identified and
developed
have access to information about disability, the services provided and
the relevant legislation
Page 35 of 54
have access to advocacy provision to assist them in having their voices
heard within disability services
have access to support services, including peer support, and
educational programmes.
have the benefit of a national Code of Practice to guide disability
services in their work with significant others, which would indicate good
practice from the first time of contact with services and would promote
transparency, negotiation, consent and mutual respect.
Have access to a carer key worker, as appropriate, who could provide
appropriate and accurate information, involve carers in the needs
assessment and care planning process and assist carers at key times
e.g. points of transition and in the process of discharge.
Further, the NDA considers that children and siblings of people with
disabilities may have specific issues that should be addressed in the Strategic
Review. Children of people with disabilities may be engaged in caring
activities that are inappropriate for their age and limit their opportunities to
fully experience childhood and adolescence. Their caring responsibilities may
include household and financial management, care of other siblings and
family members, self care, mediating relationships within and without the
family for example with neighbours and services, providing emotional support
and administering medication.
Similarly siblings of children and young people with disabilities may
experience of impacts including confusion about their brother or sister’s
impairment and service responses, lack of family time, financial hardship,
sense of taking second place, sense of responsibility and caring
requirements.
Page 36 of 54
Recommendations
The NDA recommends that family members with disabilities should be fully
supported in realizing their full potential as parents, siblings etc.
The NDA recommends that the experiences and needs of children of disability
service users and the siblings of children and young people with disabilities
should be addressed by the disability services, children’s and youth services,
through integrated action at national, regional and local levels. Support for
families in which one or more member is disabled must become an integral
component of a comprehensive family-centred approach to disability
provision. Such an approach would include
Co-ordinated and integrated needs assessment for the child(ren) and
the family, care planning and service delivery
Access to educational programmes for children
Communication between services and with the child(ren) concerned
Access to age-appropriate educational and social activities that support
a positive experience of childhood.
Appropriate support must be provided for these children so that they benefit
from the same life chances as other children.
Staff
Staff working in disability services and other affiliated community and support
services, including general health services, are instrumental in the quality of
services delivered on the ground. The experience of this group of
stakeholders should be harnessed in order to increase the level and quality of
service organisation and delivery to those who require it.
Page 37 of 54
The NDA welcomes the Department of Health and Children’s commitment to
make the health service an ‘employer of choice’. It recognizes the contribution
of health care workers of professional, administrative and ancillary grades to
the operation of disability services in situations which can be characterized by
inadequate resources, inadequate legislation and policy, lack of respect,
acknowledgement and value for work, limited or no supervision, poor co-
ordination, poor communication, limited opportunities for professional
development and career progression andlimited opportunities to input
strategically into the development of services at local, regional and national
levels.
Concerns raised with regard to staffing by persons with disabilities and their
significant others include low staff: client ratios, the lack of key workers, high
staff turnover and poor retention (which impacts on continuity of care), lack of
trained and experienced staff, lack of ongoing training of staff, and the lack of
certain professional staff e.g. speech and language specialists, social workers
and occupational therapists.
Whilst the NDA considers that much needs to change in disability services, it
also recognises that the contribution of personnel to the development of
innovative practice should be acknowledged and built upon. The NDA notes
the valuable contribution of persons with disabilities who are employed in
disability services.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review addresses the actions
required to make disability services the employer of choice for people with
disabilities.
Page 38 of 54
The NDA recommends that an audit of the range of workers working in
disability services is undertaken to collect data on total numbers in post
(permanent and temporary), number of vacancies, discipline and grade mix,
distribution of personnel by type of service and geographical location,
including data on the employment of people with disabilities .
The NDA recommends that the Department, HSE, NHO and HiQA develop a
work force strategy that will meet the changing needs and demands of the
disability sector.
Community
In line with the international best practice and human rights instruments,
services in Ireland have been reorienting from institutional to community
provision. The value of locating services close to where the person lives in
order to promote access to services, and continuity of familial and friendship
support as well as to facilitate the return of the person to their daily life is well
recognized.
Much of this service reorientation has been focused on the movement of
resources from the institution to the community, the transfer of personnel,
purchase of new buildings and establishment of community services.
However, the service reorientation has often occurred without systematic and
substantial engagement with local communities. As a consequence, many
people with disabilities have remained members of a disability service rather
than members of the community.
In order to ensure that people with disabilities are fully included in their
community, disability services should adopt a community development
approach to their work. Further, disability services should engage with
Page 39 of 54
mainstream services and community organizations that employ this approach
in order to access expertise and create synergy.
This would involve working with individuals and community organizations to
identify:
Disability issues and ways in which these could be addressed
barriers to the participation of persons with disabilities in their
community
ways of promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities as
contributing members of their community.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review promotes a community
development approach to service provision.
Community based provision
The NDA supports Government objectives and policies for people with
disabilities regarding the reorientation of disability services from hospital to
community provision. The NDA considers that service delivery should ensure
a continuum of integrated supports, interventions and treatments, including
systems to ensure successful transition between different service components
within and out with the health system. Providing a diverse range of service
options, and based on the principle of choice, flexible community based
provision should be available when and at the level of support that is required
by the individual and their significant others, recognising that this will change
over time.
Page 40 of 54
Further, the key to successful community based provision is not just being
locally based, but being fully interlinked, integrated and accessible as well.
Developing full integration and accessibility will ensure that services, once
provided locally, can be readily accessed and equally and fully availed of
by people with the widest range of capabilities throughout the community.
Developing full interlinkage across the various services provide will ensure
that individual service users no longer experience service provision as
persistently and frustratingly fragmented (however conveniently located).
Developing formal protocols to support service user transition from one
particular community service network to another will ensure that ongoing
support is provided where needed.
Ongoing communication amongst service users, service providers, the
broader community and funding bodies, and across inter-related services
and service networks will ensure that evolving needs are clearly identified,
preferred forms of provision are fully explored and resources are used to
maximum effect in building high quality service provision.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that facilitation of interlinkage, integration and
accessibility of community based provision be promoted by the Strategic
Review.
Independent needs assessment
The Disability Act 2005 has established the statutory basis for independent
needs assessment. The NDA looks forward to working with the Department of
Health and Children and the HSE in the development, implementation,
monitoring and review of the independent needs assessment system.
Page 41 of 54
It is noted that the NDA’s report Requirements for a System of Independent
Needs Assessment in Ireland [2003]
identifies the key principles which should underpin an independent
system of needs assessment in Ireland;
identifies the key elements of a system of independent needs
assessment;
identifies a framework and structure for a system of independent needs
assessment in Ireland which will cross-cut all disabilities, relevant
sectors and Government Departments;
makes recommendations for an independent Irish system of needs
assessment in relation to:
1. policy
2. procedures
3. infrastructure
4. costs.
Recommendation
The Strategic Review comments on how the independent needs assessment
system will be developed, implemented, monitored and reviewed in line with
the provisions of the Disability Act 2005.
Person-Centred Planning
Person centred planning is a way of discovering:
(1) how a person wants to live their life and
(2) what’s required to make that possible.
Page 42 of 54
It’s planning that takes as its primary focus a person as opposed to e.g. a
disability or a service. It’s ‘whole person’ oriented - not just focused on e.g.
managing a disability. It’s about all of life – not just disabilities and disability
services.
Person centred planning originated with Wolfsenberger, has its roots in the
normalization and independent living movements and is grounded in a social
model of disability and a strengths-based approach.
It is
needed because it is time to move on from focusing solely on a person’s
disability, from trying to ‘manage disabilities’ and ‘help’ or ‘fix’ people - to
appreciating people as people and allowing and supporting them live their
lives as they wish; from taking charge, taking over peoples’ lives, designing
service solutions and deciding and demanding co-operation in pursuing
anyone’s notion of what’s best for someone other than that person
themselves - to allowing freedom of expression and movement and
supporting people as they want.
Person centred planning is not service planning, traditional Individual Planning
or Assessments. These are what services do to work out - from their
perspective – how they can go about helping a person.
Person centred planning is best viewed as a lifeplan for an individual which
may be helpful in informing these and other forms of planning relating to them.
In identifying which and where exactly both particular and related forms of
support or services are, are not or are no longer required by an individual or
will be required by them for a short period only, and in flagging new forms of
support or services likely to be required in the future, for example, person
centred planning can, uniquely, offer the providers and funders of these
supports and services with a clear overview and advance indication of where
resources will and will not be required, will or will need to be allocated or freed
up and re-deployed and, perhaps, also, need to be further developed or
Page 43 of 54
integrated for the future, so, thus ensuring that these resources are used to
best advantage.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review identifies the process for
developing, implementing, monitoring and reviewing person centred planning
in statutory disability services and non-statutory disability services funded by
the Department. .
Information Accessible, adequate and timely information is a vital to the effective
utilisation of disability services.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review promotes the development
of an information strategy for disability services to be developed in partnership
with all stakeholders and with the advice of relevant statutory bodies such as
the NDA, Comhairle, Equality Authority and the Office of the Ombudsman.
The NDA recommends that information provided by disability services should
include:
the full range of choices of provision, opportunities to access different
services and interventions e.g. alternatives such as respite and
domicilary care
impairments, conditions(s), prognosis, progress within service, needs
medication: prescription, effects, procedures for administration
rights and entitlements.
Page 44 of 54
Protecting vulnerable adults
The NDA has worked on the issue of violence against women with disabilities
since 2001 and on violence against people with disabilities since 2004. The
NDA has produced Responding to violence against people with disabilities
and proceedings from a conference ‘Breaking the silence’ in 2004.
This partnership initiative will this year deliver NDA research into violence
against people with disabilities and a NDA strategic document addressing
policy, research and standards issues.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review indicates how disability
services will strategically address the issue of violence and abuse through
policy, research and provision.
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review should advocate for
collaborative, person-centred responses to the needs of those who have
experienced violence and abuse and that services should be available locally
and expeditiously for those who require them.
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review promotes inter-sectoral
collaboration between services within the disability, violence and criminal
justice sectors.
Pharmacy
The NDA has a number of concerns regarding the role of pharmaceutical
companies in both specialist and general health services. Particular concerns
are in regard to:
Page 45 of 54
The provision of non-partisan, plain English information on the function
(aims) and effects of medication as well as safe methods for coming off
medication.
The availability of affordable medication and the benefits trap’.
The role of pharmaceutical industry in reviewing their products in the
medical, scientific press.
The perceived partisan influence of pharmaceutical companies on
research and prescription practices.
The reliance of services on pharmaceutical companies for continuing
professional education and educational resources.
The lack of confidence of users and carers in the efficacy of
medication, the quality of clinical practice including prescribing and
reviewing medication, and the reliance on medication without providing
a choice of alternatives including complementary therapies.
The absence of a direct communication channel from service users
and carers to the Irish Medicine’s Board regarding problems
experienced with medication. At present this is through the prescribing
clinician and service.
The limited use of the professional expertise of pharmacists within the
health services in the provision of information, education, review,
monitoring and advice.
The lack of a holistic approach to considering and valuing the effects of
medication on health and functioning
The use of polypharmacy.
Page 46 of 54
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review includes a commitment that
the Department will undertake a review of the role of the pharmaceutical
industry in disability services and the wider health system, drawing on the
review undertaken by the UK House of Lords.
Evaluation, monitoring and review
The NDA expresses concern with the approach and timeframe taken to this
Strategic Review, including:
the short time frame for the Strategic Review, despite it being a
commitment under Sustaining Progress since 2003
the decision to focus on people with physical, sensory and intellectual
disability despite the Government policy since the Report of the
Commission on the Status of People with Disability (1996) of including
people with mental health and emotional impairments within disability
the fact that a number of Working Groups that were to be established
were not set up, most notably the Working Groups on Quality and
Standards and Personnel and Staffing.
the lack of clarity regarding how Reports of the Working Groups and
the current call for submissions will fit into the overall development of a
new Strategy for Disability Services.
Finally, the Department has not indicated how the implementation of the
overall strategy will be monitored.
The absence of a coherent and systematic overall approach to monitoring can
be a limiting factor in the development of high quality programmes and
services. This situation may lead to (1) poor information gathering, (2)
dissatisfaction amongst service users - with no proper means of redress, (3)
Page 47 of 54
services and programmes that continue to operate without agreed standards,
with no clear and accountable assessments audits or inspections and, (4)
generally speaking, people with disabilities and other relevant stakeholders
who remain largely unaware of these issues.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Department puts in place a rigorous
monitoring system in order to continuously review the impact of the Strategic
Review and respond accordingly.
Part 4: Funding and Resource Allocation
In the NDA’s submission to the Minister of Health and Children on the Health
Strategy 2001, the NDA recommended the development of criteria for
resource allocation informed by the following concepts:
levels of need in the community for the service
current availability of appropriate services to meet need
impact of the service, or lack thereof, on the health and quality of life of
the person
impact of the service, or lack thereof, on the health and quality of life of
family and informal carers.
The NDA strongly proposed that such criteria should explicitly state that the
presence of any disability should not preclude any person or group of persons
from receiving a service.
Further, our submission on the Health Strategy 2001 proposed the systematic
implementation of a transparent process for contracting between the funder
and all service providers. This process of contracting should include:
prior analysis of community need including meaningful consultation
processes, definition of service required and secured funding
Page 48 of 54
public advertising of intent to purchase a new service and request for
proposals including criteria for awarding service contracts
invitation to tender
pre-agreement assessment of the capacity of prospective providers to
deliver the required service
selection of preferred provider
negotiation and signing of contract
development and operation of service
ongoing monitoring of both levels of service and quality against agreed
criteria.
The NDA consider that the aggregate data gathered through independent
needs assessment should inform analysis of service needs.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review recommends that
a comprehensive and transparent funding system, including reporting
arrangements, should be developed for statutory and non-statutory
disability services
a system of transparent funding should report on how the multi-annual
investment under the National Disability Strategy is used
the data provided through the reporting arrangements should be
disaggregated and analysed to ensure the appropriate and equitable
allocation of resources
the budget for services should be increased annually in line with
inflation plus the requirements of the implementation of the National
Disability Strategy.
Page 49 of 54
funding for disability should be ring-fenced within the health budget
funding should be ring-fenced for specific services and initiatives for
example new innovative provision, health promotion, attitudinal change
programmes, disability / equality awareness training, to protect the
integrity of the development of a comprehensive service and
implementation of the whole National Disability Strategy.
Principles that should inform funding of services The NDA notes the World Health Organisation stated funding target in Health
21 – health for all in the 21st century.
Target 17 – Funding Health Services and Allocating Resources
By the year 2010, Member States should have sustainable
financing and resource allocation mechanisms for health care
systems based on the principles of equal access, cost-
effectiveness, solidarity and optimum quality.
In particular:
17.1 spending on health services should be adequate, while
corresponding to the health needs of the population;
17.2 resources should be allocated between health promotion and
protection, treatment and care, taking account of health impact,
cost-effectiveness and the available scientific evidence;
17.3 funding systems for health care guarantee universal coverage,
solidarity and sustainability. [132]
Funding for disability health services should
ensure the level and quality of provision, which meets the requirements
of national and international human rights and equality instruments
be equivalent to that of other health facilities
Page 50 of 54
target health inequalities, reflecting socio- economic need
be dependent on the provision of a quality of service that meets
stringent national standards
deliver value for money
be flexible to address changing need
support innovation
be withdrawn from services which do not provide a nationally agreed
quality of provision
be linked to addressing the needs of the individual
work within an investment framework, considering the costs to the
individual, family, community and wider society of not providing
resources to support the recovery and social inclusion of persons with
disabilities
be informed by the impacts of budgetary cuts in the disability sector on
the individual, family and community.
Recommendation
The NDA recommends that the Strategic Review should include a set of
principles to inform future funding of disability services, informed by the WHO
funding target.
Part 5: Conclusion
The NDA intends the information and recommendations within this
submission to be constructive and useful. The NDA recognises the
significance and challenge of the Strategic Review. Within our statutory
remits, the NDA welcomes opportunities to work with the Department in the
Page 51 of 54
completion of the Strategic Review and its implementation, monitoring and
review.
Page 52 of 54
Draft to Authority 27 September 2005
Appendices
I References
Barron, S. & Mulvany, F., (2004), Annual Report of the National Intellectual Disability
Database Committee 2004, Dublin: Health Research Board
Central Statistics Office, (2002), Quarterly National Household Survey: Disability in the
Labour Force, Second Quarter 2002, Dublin: CSO
Central Statistics Office, (2002), Census of Population, Dublin: CSO
Comhairle (2003) The Jigsaw of Advocacy: Finding a voice, Dublin: Comhairle
Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities (1996) A Strategy for Equality: Report
of the Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities, Dublin: The Stationery Office
Galligan, K. & Mulvany, F. (2004), National Physical and Sensory Disabilty Database:
Prelimiary Analysis, Dublin: Health Research Board
Irish Heart Foundation, (2001), Fifty Years of Heart Disease in Ireland: Mortality, Morbidity
and Health Service Implications, Dublin: Irish Heart Foundation
National Disability Authority (2002) Public Attitudes to Disability in the Republic of Ireland,
Dublin: National Disability Authority
National Disability Authority (2003) Towards Best Practice in Provision of Health Services for
People with Disabilities in Ireland, Dublin: National Disability Authority
National Disability Authority (2003) Responding to violence against people with disabilities,
Dublin: National Disability Authority and Women’s Aid
National Disability Authority (2004) Strategic Plan 2004-2006, Dublin: National Disability
Authority
National Disability Authority (2004) Disability Proofing Template For Local Government
Barcelona Declaration Project 2001-2004, Dublin: National Disability Authority
National Disability Authority (2005) The Experiences of People with Disabilities in Accessing
Health Services in Ireland: Do inequalities exist?, Dublin: National Disability Authority
Page 53 of 54
Draft to Authority 27 September 2005
Punch, A., (2005), Panel Discussion Meeting the Needs of the Older Population: The
Evidence Base for Planning, Dublin, Planning for an Ageing Population: Strategic
Considerations Conference Proceedings, Dublin: NCAOP
Shevlin,M. and Rose,R., (2003) Encouraging Voices Respecting the insights of young
people who have been marginalised, Dublin: National Disability Authority
World Health Organisation, (2001), Mental and Neurological Conditions Factsheet, WHO
World Health Organisation, (2004), Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke, WHO
Whyte,J., (2005) Research With Children With Disabilities Guidelines and Checklist for
Good Practice, Dublin: National Disability Authority
Page 54 of 54