By: Uvaice Nasir, Harman Sondhi, Kairav Naik and Suraj Gupta.
Sub-National Financial Management and Accountability Reforms Experience from Indonesia Asmeen Khan &...
-
Upload
hillary-bond -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Sub-National Financial Management and Accountability Reforms Experience from Indonesia Asmeen Khan &...
Sub-National Financial Management and Accountability Reforms
Experience from Indonesia
Asmeen Khan & Rajiv Sondhi
Presentation Roadmap
Key features of decentralization in Indonesia– Regulatory Developments and Framework
– Country Profile Defining the Country’s FM Reform Agenda Moving from National to Sub-national levels Some Outstanding Issues at Sub National level The Challenges of Transition The Bank’s approach and response
Key Features of Decentralization
Fundamental and simultaneous transitions – political, economic, fiscal, administrative. Far reaching impact.
‘Big Bang’ Fiscal Decentralization 2001: Laws 22 and 25 in 1999 on Decentralization and Fiscal relations and Law 34 on Regional Taxes in 2000
Expenditure responsibilities for public service delivery decentralized to localities
Laws revised 2004: Some political claw-back. E.g. Ministry of Home Affairs must approve provincial budgets (ex-ante)
Raises some very fundamental issues on administrative capacity, fiduciary management and accountability.
Country ProfileThe Story so far….
32% of overall country’s total budget is SN expenditures.
There has been a substantial decline in overall development spending, despite fiscal consolidation at the centre.
Development budgets remain scattered between the Centre (about half), provinces (14%) and Local Govts. 440 local governments *, average budget of $32.8 million each, population of 470,000, on average spend 34% of budget on development expenditures.
Local Govts. remain highly dependent on fiscal transfers from centre. IG system of fiscal transfers is based on equalizing grant (DAU), shared revenues and taxes and capital grant.
Degree of inequality between regions and provinces is staggering.
Domestic borrowing limited, foreign borrowing needs approval by Ministry of Finance (borrowing less than one half of one percent of GDP)
Own source revenues limited but have doubled in past 4 years !
Data show trend of budget surplus in local governments.
* Kabupaten, Kota
1999-2002
High Dependency on IG transfers
Structure of Local Govt. Revenues
Structure of Local Government Revenue
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1997 1998 1999 2001 2002
Perc
en
t o
f T
ota
l R
even
ue
Other Rev
Grants
Shared Rev
Ow n-Source
Large increase in level of expenditure
Majority of spending goes to staff
Structure of Local Government Expenditure
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1997 1998 1999 2001 2002
Perc
en
t o
f T
ota
l E
xp
en
dit
ure
Other
Trd & Trns
Oth Rt
Staff
Poor budget forecasting
Local Government Surplus and Reserves
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
1997 1998 1999 2001 2002
Bln
s o
f R
up
iah
Deficit/Surplus
End-of-Period Reserves
Significant increase in surplus and reserves as percentage of total expenditure—16 percent for all sub-national governments (1.2 percent of GDP);
The Country’s PFM Reform Journey
Bank diagnostic work ( PER 2000, CFAA & CPAR 2001-SN FM assessment 2003); on-going policy dialogue.
The National Reform Agenda gets set– White Paper issued by Govt. 2002– New Laws on State Finance, Treasury and Audit (2003,
2004). Implementing regulations being issued in stages.– Budgeting reforms – performance budgeting, GFS,
Accounting Standards.– Modernization of Ministry of Finance– GFMRAP Project to lock in reforms, treasury automation– Audit sector reform recently commenced.
Changing practices may be a bigger challenge, as law enforcement is endemically weak.
Moving Reforms to the DistrictsThe challenge is local, as districts move centre-stage
Political IssuesPolitical Issues
•Evidence of elite capture
•Limited local information
•Some participation
in local decision making
Administrative IssuesAdministrative Issues•Inconsistent legal framework
•Proliferation of regional governments •Limited authority over local civil service
•PFM systems improving, gradually. •Weak local capacity
Institutional IssuesInstitutional Issues•Pressing need for institutional reforms
to support increased responsibilities:–To improve investment climate
–To strengthen governance
–To improve service delivery• Huge variation in regional needs,
capacity and performance
Fiscal TransfersFiscal Transfers•Formula-based DAU,
though limited equalization•Shared taxes fluctuate
and create inequality
DevelopmentImpact
The Financial Management and Accountability BeehiveSome Outstanding Issues at Local Level
BudgetExecution
Planning
&
Budgeting
AccountingReporting
External Audit
Oversight
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Regulatory
Framework
Some Outstanding Issues - Regulatory Framework
BudgetExecution
Planning
&
Budgeting
AccountingReporting
External Audit
Oversight
Regulatory Framework Regulatory
Framework
Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Key National Laws on PFM passed - but many implementing regulations are yet to come out. Implementation handicapped.
Central Regulations are PFM Regulations; links between sectors and between plans and fiscal budgets not well laid out.
Regulatory authorities unclear – between MOF and Home Affairs; Conflicts in some regulations.
Regions not always clear on what their legislative authority is. Few districts have appropriate and comprehensive local legislation or institutional arrangements in place for FM
Although modernized Procurement decree issued (2003), there is no procurement law.
Law enforcement continues to be a major concern.
Limited public consultation on draft local laws or budget process-though required by law
Some Outstanding Issues – Planning and Budgeting
Five year plan lacks targets, priorities or hard budget constraint
Many bank accounts for technical departments, not all revenue reported
Though communities participate in planning activities—disconnect between plans and budgets
Budget realization varies from 80-95%, budgets amended at least once a year, Region’s own revenues exceed targets
Some districts use different expenditure classifications not consistent with GFS classification - difficult to account for costs.
Districts starting to use performance based budgeting – can’t distinguish salaries versus goods and services
BudgetExecution
Planning
&
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
External Audit
Oversight
Regulatory Framework
Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Some Outstanding Issues – Budget Execution
Weak cash management – inefficiency from idle funds and pilferage risks;no cash forecasting;
Local revenues collection – arbitrary basis for setting levies, fees, resulting in random and nuisance taxes; no analysis of revenue potential;poor revenue forecasting.
Procurement – weak capacity;collusive practices endemic.No transparency.
Outdated administrative procedures weaken internal controls.
Internal audit agencies at regional and provincial levels cover about 5% of budget, not professionally staffed, seen as punishment posting.
Weaknesses in internal controls over local cash collections
Multiple bank accounts, frequently not reconciled to accounting records.
BudgetExecution
ProcurementTreasury Mgmt
Internal Controls
Planning
&
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
External Audit
Oversight
Regulatory Framework
Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Some Outstanding Issues – Accounting, Reporting
Cash basis and single entry accounting.
Confusion over accounting standards due to inconsistency between MOF and Home Affairs guidelines
Very weak capacity that do not allow move to improved accounting practices and accrual accounting
Reporting restricted to Budget realization reports.
Timeliness of reporting improving, now legally required within 4 months of year end. But reliability?
BudgetExecution
ProcurementTreasury Mgmt
Internal Controls
Planning &
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
StandardsTimelinessReliability
External Audit
Oversight
Regulatory Framework
- Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Some Outstanding Issues – External Audit
Supreme Audit Institution (BPK) is able to cover only 50% of sub-national governments.
Audit Reports not yet publicly disclosed.
Audit mandate primarily to certify Budget Realization Reports of governments. Performance audits not yet developed.
BudgetExecution
ProcurementTreasury Mgmt
Internal Controls
Planning &
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
StandardsTimelinessReliability
Regulatory Framework
- Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
External Audit
Oversight
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Some Outstanding Issues – Oversight
Limited capacity of Local Legislatures to review budgets or review performance
Public disclosure of financial and procurement virtually non-existent. Budget documents difficult to read and accessible.
Civil Society and slow slowly flexing their power
Oversight
BudgetExecution
ProcurementTreasury Mgmt
Internal Controls
Planning &
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
StandardsTimelinessReliability
External Audit
Regulatory Framework
- Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
Some Outstanding Issues – Public Debt and Asset Management
No consolidated information on regional public assets;
Local Public debt requires central (MOF) approval.
Municipal debt market very nascent
Few formal records on local public debt
Oversight
BudgetExecution
ProcurementTreasury Mgmt
Internal Controls
Planning &
BudgetingComprehensiveness
Classification
Projection
AccountingReporting
StandardsTimelinessReliability
External Audit
Regulatory Framework
- Legal architecture- Inter Government
fiscal relations
Public Debt and Asset
Management
PFM Reforms Critical Success Factors
(i) Commitment to reform; Supply side vs Demand side - Stimulating the demand for reforms. Role of civil society, media and donors. Change champions.
(ii) Identification of functional reform priorities; thinking small. Which end of cycle to start? Synchronizing with central reforms.
(iii) Adequacy of the roll-out plan and the sequencing of reforms; clearly defining benchmarks and milestones;modular approach. Should reform of budget preparation precede or follow budget execution reforms?
(iv) Adequacy of technical solution; use of technology, aligned with institutional reforms. But change in business processes bigger challenge.
(v) Adequacy of capacity building activities; capacity to absorb and then sustain reforms.
(vi) Realism of short, medium, and long-term cost estimates.
How the Bank has responded in Indonesia: challenges and opportunities
Challenge: How to reorganize and work with 400 plus SNGs with weak capacity, and unfamiliar with the Bank, poor fiduciary environment and incomplete decentralization policy framework
Strategic organization Indonesia CAS FY2004-2007, cross-cutting focus on SNGs
through “multi-sector” local government platform group-estimated lending $400-600 million over current CAS
Coordinated policy advice dialogue and analysis through dedicated decentralization team
Capacity Building Coordinated capacity building program through WBI and
partnership with other donors (DFID, Dutch)
Approach and Response
Continue to consolidate National reform. GFMRAP – APL to lock in reforms at National Level
Sub-national Lens on Country Diagnostic Work Regional PER to provide sub-national component
Cross-sectoral Reform Loans Series of sub-national local governance reform projects with “reform
minded” districts and cities targeting capacity building, TA in procurement, FM, budget transparency and accountability, and improving local investment climate
Sectoral projects which build in governance reform at local institutions (e.g. Water Utilities, Higher Education Institutes)
PFM Measurement Toolkit under development
Sub National Measurement Framework for Good Financial Governance
Measurement framework and toolkit under development Toolkit measure integrity of processes at each stage of PFM spectrum Design will provide ‘Snapshot’ and ‘Trajectory’ Scorecard PFM Toolkit will embed PFM outcomes in a wider sectoral context
Key OutcomesPublic Service Delivery
Reduced CorruptionEffective Governance Structures and Processes
Good Financial Governance
Budget Formulation
ExternalAudit
OversightBudget
ExecutionAccountingReporting
Thank you!