Study of Relationship between trigger tools
Transcript of Study of Relationship between trigger tools
![Page 1: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Study ofStudy ofRelationshipRelationship
between trigger toolsbetween trigger toolsbetween trigger tools between trigger tools and adverse drug events and adverse drug events tt S d tS d t PhPh S h jS h jat at SomdetSomdet PhraPhra SangharajaSangharaja
the 19th hospital, the 19th hospital, KanchanaburiKanchanaburi..p ,p ,
Researcher : Duangmee K Phetsai C Khunthongphet U and Sengsoon N
6th year pharmacy student, Faculty of pharmacy, Silpakorn University
Researcher : Duangmee K., Phetsai C., Khunthongphet U., and Sengsoon N.
Advisor: Assist.Prof.Dr. Tewthanom K.1
![Page 2: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
O tliOutline
• Introductionh d• Methods
• Results• Conclusion
2
![Page 3: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
BACKGROUND‐ BACKGROUND‐ TRIGGER TOOLS
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction3
![Page 4: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• Adverse drug event (ADE)A N i i t d d t th d d– A Noxious, unintended response to the drug and occur in doses used for people with prophylaxis, diagnosis, therapy, or modification of physiologicdiagnosis, therapy, or modification of physiologic functions.
• Report of Health product vigilance center p p g(March 2013) found 23.5% of severe ADE from all hospitals in Thailand.
• Spontaneous ADR monitoring detect adverse events only 10 to 20 percent of errors are ever
t dreported.
IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) 2009 4
![Page 5: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Am J Hosp Pharm, 48. 2611-2616 5
![Page 6: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) 2009 6
![Page 7: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Trigger tools1
– A retrospective review of a random sample of inpatient hospital records using “triggers” (or clues) to identify possible adverse events.possible adverse events.
– Assess the level of harm from each adverse event– Determine whether adverse events are reduced over time
as a result of improvement efforts.• Rozich JD (2003)2
Th d t d t h i t i th t f– The adapted technique appears to increase the rate of ADE detection approximately 50-fold over traditional reporting methodologies.
2Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:194–2001IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) 2009 7
![Page 8: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• 6 modules of trigger tools that were specify by IHI1. Cares module triggers2. Surgical module triggersMedication Module
Triggers3. Medication module triggers4. Intensive care module triggers
Triggers
gg5. Perinatal module6. Emergency department module6. Emergency department module
8
![Page 9: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Medication module triggersM1: Clostridium difficile positive M7: Diphenhydramine usepcultureM2: PTT greater than 100 sM3: INR greater than 6
p yM8: Flumazenil useM9: Naloxone useM10: Antiemetic useM3: INR greater than 6
M4: Glucose less than 50 mg/dlM5: Rising BUN or Serum C i i h 2 i
M10: Antiemetic use M11: Over-sedation/hypotensionM12 Ab t di ti tCreatinine greater than 2 times
baselineM6: Vitamin K administration
M12: Abrupt medication stopM13: Other
1. Calcium
M3: INR greater than 6 INR greater than 4M5: Rising BUN or Serum Creatinine greater than
polystyrene sulfonate
2 KCl Elixir
IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) 2009 9
g g2 times baseline Rising creatinine of EnalaprilM7: Diphenhydramine use CPM injection use MODIFIED
2. KCl Elixir
![Page 10: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
S d d i‐ Study design‐ Process
‐ Data analysis‐ Statistical analysis
METHODSMETHODSStatistical analysis
METHODSMETHODS10
![Page 11: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• Retrospective cross-sectional descriptiveRetrospective cross sectional descriptive study
• Researchers collected inpatient medical• Researchers collected inpatient medical record during August to September 2013 which existed trigger toolswhich existed trigger tools
11
![Page 12: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Reviewed Trigger tools Standard of IHI Global trigger tool (2009) and Thai HA
Specified Trigger tools of each ADEs following IHI Global trigger tool (2009) that could collected data
Brought each Trigger Not
Brought each Trigger tools to search Name, HN, AN of inpatient of Stopped
found
HOSxP program
12
![Page 13: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Brought HN to h di l
FoundAnalyzed a relationship
b t th t i
Not related
search medical records
between the trigger tools and adverse
drug events (ADEs)
Stopped
(ADEs)
RelatedCalculated percent
of ADEs which
Categorized Classification of ADEs following NCC MERP Indexcan detect from
using Trigger tools
Rearranged percent of ADEs
Brought data of all trigger tools to calculate Positive predictive value (PPV) and
Brought trigger tool which had the highest of which can detect from using
Trigger tools
Brought trigger tool which had the highest of percent of ADEs which could detect from using
Trigger tools to analyze Sensitivity 13
![Page 14: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Example of Record of ADEs that were detected by using trigger tools
14
![Page 15: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
1 Percent of ADEs and rearranged1. Percent of ADEs and rearranged 2. Percent of each classification of ADEs
following NCC MERP Index (E-I)
Microsoft Microsoft Excel Excel 20132013
following NCC MERP Index (E I)
3 Positive predictive value & SensitivityMedcalcMedcalc
diagnosticdiagnostic3. Positive predictive value & Sensitivity
4 Test for significance level (χ2) [α = 0 05] by
diagnostic diagnostic evaluationevaluation
4. Test for significance level (χ2) [α = 0.05] by
PSPP programPSPP program
15
![Page 16: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
RESULTSRESULTSRESULTSRESULTS16
![Page 17: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Table 5 Summary Data of All trigger tools
Data The number of IPD file that were discovered
The number of IPD file that were found AEs
E 38
F 6
NCC MERP G -
H -
I -
Total IPD Flies 152 44
Average Length of Stay (day) 5
17
![Page 18: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Table 15 AE(%) were verified by each trigger tool compared with total trigger tooltotal trigger tool
Trigger tool AE(%) were verified by each trigger tool compared with total trigger tool
1 KCl li i 50 001. KCl elixir 50.00
2. Rising creatinine of Enalapril 15.91
3. Calcium polystyrene sulfonate (Kalimate®) 11.36
4. Chlorpheniramine 11.36
5. Naloxone, Vitamin K 9.09
6.International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 4 2.27( )
18
![Page 19: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Table 16 AE(%) were verified by each trigger tool compared with total AEs which arranged in NCC MERP category Etotal AEs which arranged in NCC MERP category E
T i lAE(%) were verified by each trigger
Trigger tool tool compared with total AEs which arranged in NCC MERP category E
1. KCl elixir 43.18
2. Rising creatinine of Enalapril 13.64
3. Calcium polystyrene sulfonate (Kalimate®) 9.09
4. Chlorpheniramine 9.09
5. Naloxone 4.55
6. Vitamin K 4.55
7. INR > 4 2.27
19
![Page 20: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Table 17 AE(%) were verified by each trigger tool compared with total AEs which arranged in NCC MERP category F
AE(%) were verified by each triggerTrigger tool
AE(%) were verified by each trigger tool compared with total AEs which arranged in NCC MERP category F
1 KCl elixir 6 821. KCl elixir 6.822. Calcium polystyrene sulfonate (Kalimate®) 2.273. Chlorpheniramine 2.274 Rising creatinine of Enalapril 2 274. Rising creatinine of Enalapril 2.275. INR > 4 0.006. Naloxone 0.007 Vitamin K 0 007. Vitamin K 0.00
20
![Page 21: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Table 18 Positive predictive value and sensitivity of Each trigger tool
Trigger toolNaloxone
administrationINR > 4
Rising creatinine of
E l il
KClelixir CPM
Calcium polystyrene
sulfonate Vitamin Kadministration Enalapril elixir sulfonate
(Kalimate®)
True Positive 2 1 7 22 5 5 2False Positive 0 1 9 32 24 24 20
False Negative Not found
Notfound
Not found 24 5 5 Not
found
PositiveP di ti 1 0 5 0 44 0 41 0 17 0 17 0 09Predictive
value1 0.5 0.44 0.41 0.17 0.17 0.09
Sensitivity Not calculated
Not calculated
Not calculated 0.48 0.50 0.50 Not
calculated
21
![Page 22: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Table 19 Chi-square of KCL elixir
KCl Hypokalemia
Chi S 1877 01 5634 91Chi-Square 1877.01 5634.91
df 1 3
Asymp. Sig. 0.001 0.001
Chi-square statistics that were calculated by PSPP program found trigger tool, KCl elixir, significance related with hypokalemia from
medicine usage (P = 0 001 Alpha 0 05)medicine usage. (P = 0.001, Alpha 0.05)
22
![Page 23: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Table 20 Chi-sqaure of Chlorpheniramine
CPM Hypersensitivity
Chi-Square 1961.62 5959.43q
df 1 3
Asymp. Sig. 0.001 0.001
Chi-square statistics that were calculated by PSPP program found trigger tool ,CPM significance related with Hypersensitivity from
medicine usage. (P =0.001,Alpha 0.05)
23
![Page 24: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Table 21 Chi-sqaure of Calcium polystyrene sulfonate
Calcium polystyrene sulfonate Hyperkalemia
Chi-Square 1961.62 5959.43
df 1 3
Asymp. Sig. 0.001 0.001
Chi-square statisics that were calculated by PSPP program found trigger tool ,Calcium polystryrene sulfonate, significance related with
Hyperkalemia from medicine usage. (P =0.001,Alpha 0.05)
24
![Page 25: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
CONCLUSIONCONCLUSIONO U IOO U IO25
![Page 26: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Positive predictive value of each trigger tool1) Naloxone (PPV = 1.00) 2) INR > 4 (PPV = 0.5)3) Rising creatinine of Enalapril (PPV = 0.44)4) KCl elixir (PPV = 0.42) Naloxone could
l di) ( )
5) Chlorpheniramine (PPV = 0.17)6) Calcium polystyrene sulfonate (PPV = 0.17)
extremely predict opportunity of i id t i iti
6) Calcium polystyrene sulfonate (PPV 0.17)7) Vitamin K (PPV = 0.09) opioids toxicities
26
![Page 27: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
From sensitivity analysis• KCl elixir was 0.48.
– Detect hypokalemia from medicine usage about 48 %48 %
• Chlorpheniramine was 0.5. – Detect hypersensitivity from medicine usage about 50 %
C l i l lf 0 5• Calcium polystrene sulfonate was 0.5. – Detect hyperkalemia from medicine usage about 50%50%
27
![Page 28: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Chi-square statistics calculation found 3 trigger tools ( KCl elixir Chlorphenira-trigger tools ( KCl elixir, Chlorpheniramine, Calcium polystyrene sulfonate) have p value = 0 001 (alpha < 0 05)have p-value = 0.001 (alpha < 0.05),
So suggest that …
28
![Page 29: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Trigger tool KCl elixir statistical significantly gg g yrelated with hypokalemia from medicine usage Trigger tool CPM statistical significantlyTrigger tool CPM statistical significantly
related with hypersensitivity from medicine usageusage Trigger tool Calcium polystyrene sulfonate
statistical significantly related withstatistical significantly related with hyperkalemia from medicine usage
29
![Page 30: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
TAKE HOMETAKE HOMETAKE HOME TAKE HOME MESSAGEMESSAGEMESSAGEMESSAGE
30
![Page 31: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• Using Trigger tools to design 1.
g gg gprotocol for preventing ADEs
2• Using result of this paper to closely
monitor the occurrences of ADEs2.
Extending collecting time to more3.
• Extending collecting time to more than 2 months
31
![Page 32: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Mr. Jetiyanuwat C.Mrs Tananonniwat SMrs. Tananonniwat S.Miss Ngernngam N.
Pharmacists at SomdetPhraSangharajaPharmacists at SomdetPhraSangharaja the 19th hospital, Kanchanaburi.
32
![Page 33: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
THANK YOUTHANK YOUFORFOR
YOUR ATTENTIONYOUR ATTENTION33
![Page 34: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
1. Searching ADEs from using trigger toolsg g gg- HOSxP program
2. Confirming the occurrence of ADEs Co g t e occu e ce o s- Medical records - Spontaneous ADR monitoring reportp g p- ADR report in HOSxP program
3. Collecting data that classify by each trigger tool g y y gg- Record of ADEs that were detected by using trigger tools
34
![Page 35: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Table 5 Summary Data of All trigger tools
Data The number of IPD filethat were discovered
The number of IPD file that were found AEs
SexMale 56 13
Female 96 31
Age
0 - 15 23 3
16 - 30 17 2
31 45 14 6Age (year) 31 – 45 14 6
46 – 60 32 9
≥ 61 66 24 61
35
![Page 36: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• Harm– Unintended physical injury resulting from or contributed to– Unintended physical injury resulting from or contributed to
by medical care that requires additional monitoring, treatment or hospitalization, or that results in death.
• This tool utilizes categories E, F, G, H, and I of the NCC MERP Index because these categories describe harm.
Category E: Temporary harm to the patient and required interventionCategory F: Temporary harm to the patient and required initial or prolonged hospitalizationCategor G Permanent patient harmCategory G: Permanent patient harmCategory H: Intervention required to sustain lifeCategory I: Patient death
IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) 2009 36
![Page 37: Study of Relationship between trigger tools](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022050207/626de8a9341a2a1957631e33/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
3. ควรเพิ่มระยะเวลาที่เลือกเก็บขอมูลยอนหลงัใหมากกวา 2่เดือนเนือ่งจากการทบทวนแฟมประวัติผูปวยยอนหลงัใน
ระยะเวลา 2 เดือน รวมกับปจจัยทางดานฤดูกาล อาจทําใหไมพบเหตการณไมพึงประสงคบางเหตการณใหไมพบเหตกุารณไมพงประสงคบางเหตกุารณโดยเฉพาะเหตุการณทีม่โีอกาสพบไดนอย เชน VitaminK กบั Dengue Hemorrhagic fever แตหากทําเพิ่มK กบ Dengue Hemorrhagic fever แตหากทาเพมระยะเวลาที่เลอืกเกบ็ขอมูลอาจจะใชวิธีการสุมตัวอยางทางสถิติเพื่อสุมแฟมประวัติผูปวยที่ใชในการทบทวนแทนุ ู
37