Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

33
ELEMENTARY TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD INQUIRY- BASED SCIENCE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010- 2011)

description

Elementary Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Inquiry-Based Science and the Importance of Science Education. Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011). What are the views of elementary teachers toward inquiry-based science? Do they feel science is important to the curriculum?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Page 1: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

ELEMENTARY TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD INQUIRY-

BASED SCIENCE AND THE IMPORTANCE OF

SCIENCE EDUCATION

Study by Emeline SwansonNew Visions Education (2010-2011)

Page 2: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

WHAT ARE THE VIEWS OF ELEMENTARY TEACHERS TOWARD INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE? DO THEY FEEL

SCIENCE IS IMPORTANT TO THE CURRICULUM?

Page 3: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

WHAT IS INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE?

A method of teaching science that encourages students to question, brainstorm, and through investigation learn science instead of having them listen to the teacher give the information.

Page 4: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

PURPOSE OF STUDY

• to see where science stands in the elementary level curriculum

• identify the main factors limiting teachers from teaching science

• discover ways of improving science teaching

Page 5: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

INCLUDED IN THE PRESENTATION:

Background information on the topic of inquiry science and it’s use in the classroom

Each step taken to conduct the research study

Result analysis and discussion

Why the topic is significant and useful for future elementary school teachers to know

Page 6: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

BACKGROUND RESEARCH

Page 7: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

SCIENCE IS EXPENSIVE

One reason why teachers struggle to teach science effectively is because they lack the materials necessary.

“The costly subject is causing many districts to push it away, leaving children without the ability to experiment at a young age”

(Benavente & Wagner, 2006).

Page 8: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Laboratory equipment, curricular packages, and computers are all very expensive.

Science is one of the most important aspects to proper cognitive development. Without it, children are unable to learn the conceptual foundations of science which is key in excelling in this area of education.

Page 9: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

One solution, proposed by Paul A. Wagner and Lillian Benavente of the University of Houston, is to buy the game “Mastermind.” Students enjoy playing it while it enhances their cognitive development.

This is an easy alternative rather than spending hundreds of dollars on equipment that will eventually be replaced.

Page 10: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

LACK OF CONFIDENCE

In order for students to learn the material, teachers must be able to present their knowledge well and use different methods. When teachers lack the confidence to teach science, the students will not be learning to their fullest potential.

Page 11: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Today, teachers show they are lacking in content

knowledge and visions of scientific practice.

Page 12: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

TECHNOLOGY APPLIED TO SCIENCE

Stressing the use of technology in schools enhances students learning

Scientific games allows students to practice solving problems that occur in everyday scenarios

Page 13: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

LACK OF TIME “It was always a subject that was...

tucked in if there was time” (Meyer, Tabachnick, Hewson, Lemberger, & Park, 1999).

“Lack of confidence in science results in less time teaching the subject: also, when it is taught, it will be taught poorly...” (Palmer, 2001).

Page 14: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Teachers mainly focus on mathematics, language arts, and social studies, leaving little room

for science in the curriculum. Teachers realize that science

takes a lot of time, but they are unable to find the extra time to teach it. They are overwhelmed

with their other duties and narrow their concentrations on preparing students for standardized testing.

Page 15: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

METHODOLOGY

Page 16: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

A letter was written to the administration at an elementary school asking for approval to use the staff in this study

A questionnaire was developed and distributed to 31 teachers at a suburban elementary school

The subjects’ teaching experience vary from 3-25 years

Page 17: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

The questionnaire was developed to measure the depth of inquiry science used in the classroom. It contains a series of 5 questions:

1. Do you think science is an important part of the curriculum?

2. In your own elementary school years, did you learn science through an inquiry-based approach?

Page 18: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

3. Are you confident in teaching science?

4. How often is inquiry-based science teaching used in your classroom?

5. What kind of assistance would you need in order to teach more inquiry science?

Page 19: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

HYPOTHESISThe survey given out to 31

teachers will most likely show an expected lack of interest or confidence in the subject.

Page 20: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

Page 21: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Less than half of the surveys were returned

Despite the low number of surveys received, the results were still interesting and informative.

A graph was created for every question aside from number 1.

100% of the surveys collected indicated that science is an important part of the curriculum.

Page 22: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Yes No Sometimes0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Question Responses

Elem

enta

ry T

each

ers

Did You Learn Science Through an Inquiry-Based Approach?

Page 23: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Are You Confident in Teaching the Subject of Science?

Very confident Somewhat confident Not at all confident0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Question Responses

Elem

enta

ry T

each

ers

Page 24: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Very often (1x a day) Often (1x a week) Occasionally (1-2x a month)

Never0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Question Responses

Elem

enta

ry T

each

ers

How Often is Inquiry-Based Science Used in Your

Classroom?

Page 25: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Professional De-velopment Workshops

More time to plan/research

Materials None N/A0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Question Responses

Elem

enta

ry T

each

ers

What Kind of Assistance Would You Need in Order to Teach More

Inquiry Science?

Page 26: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

It is clear that all of the teachers feel that science is an important subject in the curriculum. One teacher wrote, "It encourages children to question and test theories and they love it."

Another teacher wrote, “If you don't

understand science, you don't understand our world!" Children enjoy making connections to the world and finding answers to their questions.

Page 27: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

The overall results from this particular school were positive. For the majority of the teachers, science appears to be a part of every school day here.

Page 28: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

ERROR ANALYSIS Distributing surveys to more than one school

would be ideal

Observing teachers along with distributing questionnaires gives the researcher a better understanding of view look on inquiry science

More questions should be added to the survey to get a deeper look at a teacher's point of view

Page 29: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

DISCUSSION

Page 30: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

Studying elementary teachers' views toward inquiry science and the importance of science itself is crucial when it comes to improving the curriculum. This study was conducted in order to discover possible ways that could increase the amount of science taught in elementary schools.

Page 31: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

At the particular school included in this study, lack of confidence did not seem to be an issue, according to the results. Lack of materials, lesson plans, and time, however, had a major affect on science teaching.Many of the teachers involved made note that professional development workshops and training would be incredibly helpful.

Page 32: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

From the results seen, it can be concluded that science is an important aspect at the studied elementary school, but it is not an easy subject for many of the teachers to incorporate in the curriculum.

It is important for future teachers to understand how to teach science effectively and gain the confidence needed to teach it. Time management is something that many teachers need to work on.

Page 33: Study by Emeline Swanson New Visions Education (2010-2011)

REFERENCESBenavente, Lillian. Wagner, Paul. (2006). Masterminding science

education: Cost and pedagogical potency in science education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 10. (4), 1-10.

Howes, E. (2002). Learning to teach science for all in the elementary grades: What do preservice teachers bring? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39. (9), 845-869.

Palmer, D. H. (2001). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Teacher Education, doi: 10.1002

Meyer, H., Tabachnick, B. R., Hewson, P. W., Lemberger, J., & Park, H. (1999). Relationships between prospective elementary teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of biology and of teaching science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,

Wang, F., Kinzie, M.B., McGuire, P., & Pan, E. (2009). Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Springer Science and Business Media, 37. doi: 10.1007/s10643-009-0364-6