Student Works
description
Transcript of Student Works
S T U D E N T
P R O J E C T SA N
S T U
A R C H I
SD E N T
C O
B Y
L IL E C T
IT E C T
O N
U R E,
T A B L E O F
C O N T E N T SStudio
Projects
WilsonAvenueSchool
HighlineStairs
James Street
Row-House
CaseStudies Other
CS:Azuma House
CS:Kips BayTowers
Egg Crate
UnrolledSurface
HighlineStairs
1
Site PlanScale1/32”=1’
N
Concept
Design Intent:To create a link between the High Line and a small plaza located outside the entrance of the Standard Hotel, designingof a set of stairs was proposed. The driving concept behind this project was Incremental Reduction. A single square was cut incrementally from the edge to create a series of smaller squares. The inner squares were manipulated to become space to be inhabitable.
Typology: Public Space
HighlineStairs
2
SectionScale1/8”=1’
WilsonAvenueSchool
3
Concept
Design Intent:Our goal for this project was to design a school within one of Newark’s oldest neighborhoods. Designating built and unbuilt spaces was at times challenging and frustrating. To combat the frustration, a strict modular system was created.This system allowed for a school design that was ordered andfor exterior space that was shapeable, contrary to the formof the school. Design of the exterior space was shaped to keep in mind the factor of seasonal habitation.
The Module
30’
30’ Classroom
Media Center
Technology Lab
Gym
Shifting results space that can be shaped. (Green Space)
Groups of shifted modules can span over space to create covered zones.
Modular System+
Shifting
Typology: K-8 School
RecConf
RecConf
RecConf
RecConf
RecConf
RecConf
Pre-KClassroom
3rd GradeClassroom
7th GradeClassroom
1st GradeClassroom
5th GradeClassroom
8th GradeClassroom
Kitchen Cafeteria
Fac.Dining
Sta�Dev.
SocialWork Auditorium
N
WilsonAvenueSchool
4
Win
ter I
cesk
atin
g on
the
Pond
Site Plan Scale 1”=512’
Section1/64”=1’
AcademicOtherPublic
JamesStreet
Row-house
5
Concept
Design Intent:The site given for this project was of odd proportions. Only24’ wide and generously 93’ long, divison of site had to be careful and considerate. A tri-partite scheme was devised;circulation was designated its own section and the other two sections were designed for live/work space. Height-wise,the ground �oor was designated for work, the second andthird �oors were for residential purposes. The town-house was crowned with a library and outdoor terrace for social events. Lengthwise, the site was simply divided into interiorand exterior space.
Ground Floor1/32”=1’
A
B
A
N
Up
Up
Program Division
Typology: O�ce and Residence
Public vs. Private
Circulation
Areas of Focus
Section AA1/16”=1’
JamesStreet
Row-house
6
Patient awaiting appointment Breakfast in the Library
Structural Elements
CS:Azuma House
7
Architect: Tadao AndoLocation: Osaka, JapanDevelopment: 1975-1976Construction: Pre-cast Concrete
Second Floor
First Floor
Circulation/Public vs. Private
Public Circulation Private
LivingRoom
MasterBedroom
Bedroom
Courtyard Kitchen
BR
FacadeComponents
Facade1/8”=1’
Cut-awayView
Natural Light Entry
34”67”
8
CS:Kips BayTowers
Architect: I. M. PeiLocation: New York City, New York
Development: 1960-1965
Structural Column GridCirculation Concrete Frame Tower
Corridor
Elevator
Egress Stairs
Studio
CorridorElevatorStairsKitchen/Bath
3 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
1 Bedroom
Room Typology Layout
Egg-Crating (Plywood)
Egg-Crating (Chipboard)
Egg Crate
9
UnrolledSurface
10
Exploded View
Original Sections
Unrolled Model