Fair Lending in the Student Loan Market NCHELP/EFC Student Loan Legal Meeting
Student Loan Borrowing and Repayment Trends, 2015 · PDF fileUnderstanding causes and...
Transcript of Student Loan Borrowing and Repayment Trends, 2015 · PDF fileUnderstanding causes and...
The views presented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or the Federal Reserve System.
Student Loan Borrowing and Repayment Trends, 2015 April 16, 2015
Andrew Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Joelle Scally, Wilbert van der Klaauw
2
College remains a worthwhile investment for most of those who pursue it Median annual earnings were $23,000 higher for bachelor’s
degree holders compared to high school graduates in 2014 Unemployment rates for bachelor’s degree holders much lower
than high school graduates (6% vs 3.5% in 2014) Student loans are an important tool for financing college for
many students Speech by William C. Dudley, March 4 on student loans:
“ . . .[T]here is much uncertainty and heterogeneity in outcomes, with net returns to these human capital investments being negative for some. Understanding causes and consequences of this heterogeneity is important.”
“How we finance post-secondary education has significant effects on a variety of critical economic outcomes.”
Some higher education background
3
We try to better understand student loans for two reasons: Student debt is large, and appears to have significant
effects on macroeconomic outcomes (household formation, homeownership, consumption)
Good information on borrowing and repayment is necessary to design best policies for financing this most important kind of investment
Researching student borrowing
4
Student loans defy business cycle
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200 Non - mortgage balances
HELOC Auto Loan Student Loan Credit Card
Billions of Dollars Billions of Dollars
Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax
5
During and after the Great Recession, households reduced their other debts, but student loan balances continued to increase
Because the majority of student loans are federal, tight bank lending standards did not affect student loans
The increase was a result of both increasing numbers of borrowers and increasing average balances per borrower Between 2004 and 2014, there was an 89% increase in the
number of borrowers and a 77% increase in the average balance size
College enrollment grew by 20% between 2005 and 2010 – faster than any period since the 1970’s – and has declined slightly since
Student loans increased as other debts declined
6
Total student loan balances by age group
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
under 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+
32%
Billions of Dollars
18%
12%
5%
33%
Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax
42%
33%
14% 9% 2%
7
Increases among borrowers of all ages
Student loan balances grew for borrowers of all ages between 2004 and 2014: The number of borrowers over 40 increased at twice the pace of
the number of borrowers under 40 ▫ Especially fast growth in balances held by for borrowers age 60+, up
nearly nine-fold As a consequence, share of balances held by borrowers age 40+
increased from 25% to 35%
2/3 of student loan balances are held by borrowers not in their 20s
8
Distribution of borrowers by 2014Q4 balance
Balance in 2014Q4: 20.8%
18.0%
28.5%
18.5%
7.2%
2.9%
2.4% 1.0%
0.8%
≤$5k >$5k and ≤$10k >$10k and ≤$25k >$25k and ≤$50k >$50k and ≤$75k >$75k and ≤$100k >$100k and ≤$150k >$150k and ≤$200k >$200k
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
43.3 million borrowers Mean balance: $26,700 Median balance: $14,400
9
Significant heterogeneity in amounts owed
Most borrowers have a current outstanding balance below $25k About 40% owe less than $10K
Mean outstanding balance is $26k; median balance is $15k Significant numbers of borrowers with large balances (over $25K)
Borrowers in their 30’s and 40’s have the highest mean and median balances, at about $31k and $17k respectively
10
Who is borrowing now?
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing age
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Number of originating borrowers by age*
less than 25 25-29 30-39 40+
Millions
11
The number of active student loan borrowers peaked in 2010, at about 12 million; now down to about 9 million Half of active borrowers are under age 25 After the recession, there was a slight increase in the relative
share of new borrowers in their thirties, and a decline in the share of 18-29 year olds
The Department of Education estimates suggest that there was a modest drop in enrollment between 2010 and 2013, of about 500,000 students
More importantly, a smaller share of enrolled students has taken out loans since 2010
Although the number of active borrowers is declining, the aggregate outstanding balance of borrowers overall has continued to grow as repayment rates are very low
Number of active borrowers peaked in 2010
12
Increase, then decline in borrowers from lower and middle income areas
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Internal Revenue Service; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing ZIP code incomes
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Number of originating borrowers by ZIP code income*
up to 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
Millions
13
Larger rise in level of lower income borrowers following recession
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Active borrowers by ZIP code income
up to 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k-100k
Index, 2004=100
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Internal Revenue Service; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing ZIP code incomes
14
We don’t have borrower income, so we assign borrowers to groups based on the average income in the ZIP code they lived in when they originated their first student loan Income data are from IRS and refer to 2010
Much of the change in borrowing has come from an increase, then decrease, in the number of active borrowers from lower income areas following the recession
More borrowers from lower and middle-income areas is consistent with the intended purpose of student loan program: to facilitate upward income mobility
Increase, then decline in borrowers from lower and middle income areas
15
Student debt continues to increase, especially for older borrowers Increase reflects new borrowers, higher balances and slow
repayment There is significant heterogeneity in amounts owed Highest balances are owed by borrowers in their 30s
The number of active borrowers peaked in 2010 Significant decline since then Increase and subsequent decline driven by borrowers from
relatively lower-income areas
Wrapping up, part 1
17
Distribution of payment history
29%
34%
20%
6%
11%
Snapshot of Borrowers in 2014:Q4
always current, balance decreasing
always current, balance increasing
current with previous blemish
now delinquent
now in default
Percent of Borrowers
Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax
18
We will compare several groups to better understand the determinants of repayment outcomes: Those who left school before, during, and after the Great
Recession Younger borrowers and older borrowers Borrowers from higher income and lower income areas
Understanding repayment outcomes
19
Defaults and default rate
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
2003-4 2005-6 2007-8 2009-10 2011-12 2013-14defaulted borrowers rate of default
Thousands per year Annual rate
20
The number of borrowers who default each year (defined as at least 9 months past due) increased from about half a million ten years ago to 1.2 million annually in 2011 and 2012
The number of borrowers who default has declined a bit in the last two years
The rapid increase in the defaults is partly due to the increase in the number of borrowers, but even after accounting for the increase in the borrowers, the rate of default increased over time from 2.4% in 2004 to 3.6% in 2012
The default rate declined somewhat after 2012 to 3.2%
Defaults and default rate
21
Default rate by school leaving cohort
2009 Cohort 26%
5 years later
2007 Cohort 24%
7 years later
2005 Cohort 25%
9 years later
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1 year later 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years
Share ever defaulted by years after leaving school
Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax
(after entering repayment)
22
Cohort default rates deteriorate
Default rates for the 2005, 2007, and 2009 school-leaving cohorts have all now reached roughly 25%.
− Cohort default rates continue to increase even beyond the third year of loan repayment
There is a pronounced worsening of the cohort default rate
schedules over time − Default rates are higher for later cohorts at virtually all
durations
23
5-year cohort default and delinquency rates by ZIP income
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2005 school leaving cohort
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2007 school leaving cohort
default 120+ dpd
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2009 school leaving cohort
24
Cohort default, delinquency rates by income
Default and delinquency rates higher in lower-income areas
Default and delinquency rates for borrowers from higher income areas (with mean income over $60K) have remained remarkably stable across the three cohorts
25
5-yr Cohort default and delinquency rates by age
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
lessthan 25
25-29 30-39 40+
2005 school leaving cohort
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
lessthan 25
25-29 30-39 40+
2007 school leaving cohort
default 120+ dpd
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
lessthan 25
25-29 30-39 40+
2009 school leaving cohort
26
The 5-year-default rate increased for all age groups, and it is somewhat elevated for those who left school between age 30-39
About half of the 2009 cohort borrowers in this age range had gone through defaults or severe delinquency in the subsequent 5 periods
Cohort default, delinquency rates by school-leaving age
27
Student loan repayment behavior
delinquent or in default
17%
current and paying down 37%
current, same balance
13%
current, balance increasing
33%
Student Loan Repayment Status in 2014
Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax
28
Nearly half of borrowers are not yet repaying
17% of the borrowers are in default or in delinquency
Only 37% of borrowers are current on their loan and actively paying down
46% of borrowers are current on their loans but are not in repayment
29
5-year cohort repayment difficulties, by ZIP income
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2007 school leaving cohort
default 120+ dpd debt increase
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2009 school leaving cohort
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
less than 40k
40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
2005 school leaving cohort
30
While default and delinquency rates were stable for higher income area borrowers across the three cohorts, more recent cohorts from higher income areas had a larger proportion who had not paid down
About half of the 2009 cohort are having payment difficulties on their loans (having either defaulted, gone delinquent or made no progress paying off their balance) Repayment difficulties are particularly prevalent in
borrowers from lower-income areas, where about 2/3 of borrowers have had some sort of repayment difficulty
In contrast, just over 1/3 of the borrowers from the highest income areas have had repayment difficulties
Proportion of borrowers with payment problems by cohort and income
31
2009 cohort repayment rates by income
Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years
Proportion of balance remaining by ZIP income
less than 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+
(years after leaving school)
32
We look at the net progress that borrowers from each income area have made in paying down their student loan balances
The borrowers from the lowest income areas have made practically no progress on paying down their loans The aggregate balance, five years after leaving school, is
still at 97% of where it was when they left school This is a sharp contrast with the borrowers from higher-
income areas, who have paid down nearly 30%
Little repayment progress by borrowers from lower-income areas
33
These results are further evidence of the important heterogeneity we see in the outcomes of higher education investments financed with student debt Borrowers who left school in the Great Recession had particular
difficulty with their student loan repayment, with many defaulting, becoming seriously delinquent, or not being able to reduce their balance
Borrowers from lower and middle-income areas as well as borrowers who originated loans in their 30s are also at greater risk of default and delinquency
The low overall repayment rate helps explain the steady growth
in aggregate student debt, now at nearly 1.2 trillion dollars
Wrapping up