Student Information System (SIS)/Portal Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 8, 2005...
-
Upload
myron-morton -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Student Information System (SIS)/Portal Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 8, 2005...
Student Information System (SIS)/Portal Proposal
Presentation to the UTFABTuesday, March 8, 2005
Bill Haid, Dir. Enrollment Services, [email protected], 1-3466
Don Hesser, Dir. Information Systems, [email protected], 1-5491
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 2
Outline Background “Before and after” architectures Project description Progress to date and portal demo Request for funding of staff in FY
05 Summary
Background
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 4
Overview Aged student system, ISIS, requires replacement
15 years old - not a modern, “real-time” system Very intensive of staff time; limits progress in other areas Replacement will enhance security and privacy Runs on a mainframe together with FRS and several
other applications The SIS needs dedicated and much more powerful hardware
RAMweb (quasi-portal) Complex interactions with eID and ISIS System “constraints” exceeded Aug. 03, Jan. 04, … Additional enhancements very difficult due to ISIS and
staffing limitations
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 5
Overview (cont’d) Unfunded state mandates
House Bill 03-1175 – non-SSN student IDs We support increased privacy, but need a new
SIS to accomplish College Opportunity Fund (COF) stipends
Implementing now on our current system, ISIS Also need to implement on the new Banner
system Staffing approved by UTFAB in Fall 04
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 6
Benefits of a New SIS
SSN not used as Student PID Closer to 24 x 7 access to RAMweb services New web registration system Degree Audit (GUIDE) on the web Improved/integrated advising support for
faculty and students Fewer places to maintain personal data
Example - addresses integrated into one system More web service options
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 7
UTFAB Prior Commitments UTFAB committed to the following
costs in Fall 2003: Recurring contractual costs
5 years for the SIS upgrade 3 years for the portal
UTFAB to consider staffing costs on an annual basis
“Before and After” Architectures
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 9
SIS/RAMweb Architecture – “Before”
Clie
nts
Web
Inte
rface
Stu
dent
Sys
tem
ISIS(Mainframe IDMS DB)
IS
WSIS(Delphi Oracle DB)
IS
Ramweb(Agate Web Server)
ACNS
RamWeb Client(Student End User PC)
Logging Server(Boone SQL Server 2000)
ACNS
Administrative Client(Staff End User PC)
Periweb(Periweb Sun server)
IS
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 10
Banner/Luminis architecture – “After”C
lient
sLu
min
is a
nd/o
r uP
orta
lS
CT
Ban
ner
Web Portal Server Farm
Production BannerDatabase Server
Banner Self-ServiceApplication Server
Banner ERP Coreand
SCT Workflow Server
Test/DevelopmentApplication andDatabase Server
(database, self serviceand core components)
Banner Client(core components)
Banner Client(web self-service)
Banner FormsDeveloper Workstation
Sun ONEIntegration andDirectory Server
Sun ONE Web Server
Sun ONE Web Server
Sun ONE Web Server
Sun ONE Web Server
Dynamic LoadBalancing and
SSL AccelerationServer
Sun ONECalendaring Server
1 2 3
4
5
MS SQL Server 2000CLM Database
Luminis/uPortal Database
79
10
12
13 14
16Storage
AreaNetwork
17
CLM and RMSIIS Web Server
14
Project Description
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 12
Project Organization - Committees Executive sponsors Executive directors Project managers Portal teams
Content team Technical team Training team
SIS teams Application teams Technical teams
A massive amount of work to implement the SIS is ongoing
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 13
Project Schedule
To date Feb 04 - Portal focus groups Apr 04 – Banner kick off Fall 04 – Portal phase 1 Fall 05 – Portal phase 2 – lots of rich content
Pending Fall 06 – Banner in use for student systems Fall 06 - Portal phase 3 (integration with
Banner) Years of enhancements thereafter
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 14
The “Split” of Costs 1-time costs – the University covers
100% $5.4 million!!!
Annual recurring costs University: $392,050/yr. UTF: $392,050/yr. Staffing approved annually by the UTFAB
Total cost “proportions” over 5 years University: ~80% UTF: ~20%
Progress to Date
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 16
Progress on the SIS Go live in July 2005 for Admissions, Housing and
Student Loans Conversion efforts have begun on Person, Entity,
catalog, Prospect, Student and Accounts receivable data
CSU will be an “early adopter” of Banner version 7!!! A major technical upgrade to Banner that provides
expanded functionality Bridging key sets of data between current SIS and
Banner for a 14-month period Three committees have been formed to examine
Banner, RamPoint, WebCT and SAN course and student advising tools
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 17
Progress on the Portal Active teams: 1) technical, 2) content, and 3) training Development during spring and summer 2004 “Quiet launch” followed by “noisy launch” completed
in fall 2004 http://rampoint.colostate.edu
Significant content added in FY 05 Issues:
Calendaring systems Improved WebMail (may be difficult) Messaging “threads” Portal course tools, WebCT, & Banner Course Tools Real-time integration with WebCT
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 18
FY 06 Very Important Activities “Keep the trains running on time” Implement COF
In ISIS and RAMweb A very significant and important effort!!!
In Aries and Luminis Refresh all business processes associated with
the SIS Populate student information in Aries (see next
page Ensure 100% accuracy
Explore accommodating multiple majors, e.g in registration
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 19
ISIS to ARIES Record Conversion
ISIS Data Count
Persons 750,000
Person Address Records 1,100,000
Person Telephone Records 1,000,000
Person E-mail Addresses 150,000
Person Comment 150,000
Person Hold 90,000
Parent Names 90,000
Academic History Courses 8,600,600
Academic History Transfer Records 346,000
Academic History Awards/Degrees 138,000
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 20
SARS to ARIES Record Conversion
SARS Data Count
Transaction Records 9,900,000
Payment Application Records 9,800,000
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 21
FY 06 Very Important Activities (cont’d) Real-time integration of SIS with WebCT Develop and implement the UID
Complex due to multiple conflicting requirements encompassing security, privacy and access
Complex involving eID, UID, and PID, and ID re-carding required
Develop on-line student course survey Assess faculty and advising tools Explore consolidation of calendaring systems Go live with Banner modules beginning early
in 2006
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 22
Projection of Expenses - FY 05
Will “hit” the target of $392k within a narrow margin
FY 05 Expenses (Projected)Projected Expenses = $392,050
Approved Budget = $392,050
1. Soft. maint. - 25%
2. Hardware/OS - 10%
3. Proposed Staff - 48%
4. Non-SCT soft. - 17%
5. Gaps - 0%
6. Contingency - 0%
Funding Request for FY 06
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 24
Staffing for FY 06 Portal Developer – ES Student Employees - ES Portal Java Developer - ACNS Web Applications Specialist – IS DBA (Database Administrator) – IS COF Project Manager and Implementer -
SFS
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 25
Recurring Costs for FY 06 Essential
ly identical to those for FY 05
FY 06 Expenses (Projected)Projected Expenses = $392,050
Approved Budget = $392,050
1. Soft. maint. - 25%
2. Hardware/OS - 10%
3. Proposed Staff - 48%
4. Non-SCT soft. - 17%
5. Gaps - 0%
6. Contingency - 0%
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 26
3-Year Plan FY 06
The “very important” activities cited previously FY 07
Complete Banner Installation Address “gaps” Implement Banner updates Ensure integration of the SIS with the portal
Assess other portal options, e.g. uPortal FY 08
Continue to address “gaps” Implement Banner updates Assess Learning Management Systems, e.g. Project
Sakai
Summary
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 28
UTFAB Funding Criteria1. Benefit as many students as possible
All students at CSU will benefit.
2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee
Your decision.
3. Not funded by CFT Check.
4. Adherence to budget and accountability
Your decision.
5. Potential for direct student use
Absolutely.
6. Effort and thought reflected in the plan
Your decision.
7. Justification and clarity of project plan
Your decision.
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 29
Perspective Upgrading the SIS and a portal is the
only way for the University to evolve to a modern, real-time IT environment
The portal/SIS will fundamentally enhance the ways we interact, communicate and access data and information
The project is going exceptionally well – it is on schedule and on budget
Next year is the most critical year for the project
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 30
Thank You The UTF and student
support provided the critical impetus for the project
The need for a system upgrade is great
Thank you for your support!
UTFAB - 03/08/2005
SIS/Portal Proposal 31
Discussion and questions
Are most welcome