Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
-
Upload
roberta-varela -
Category
Documents
-
view
255 -
download
7
Transcript of Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
1/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Unit 1
Introduction and Design Overview
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
2/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Need to study structural mechanics to design properly toprevent failure
There is no doubt that any of the disciplines of Aeronautics andAstronautics can contribute to an accident
-engine failure-etc.
But, the vast majority of non-human induced accidents is due to structural(material) failure (ultimately).
Purpose of 16.20: Provide you with the tools to properlyDesign Aerospace Structures to assure structural integrity
(i.e., it doesnt fail)Note, 16.20 mainly oriented in past to aircraft structures because that iswhere the main experience lies. We will try to generalize and showexamples for space structures.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
3/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Aeronautics and Astronautics deal with three major categories of
structures:1. Aircraft (atmospheric vehicles)2. Launch vehicles3. Space structures (partially a civil engineering task?)
(Note: Transatmospheric vehicles can becombinations of 1 and 2the Shuttle is!)
IMPORTANT: Many of the design considerations for these
three categories are different, but the same techniques andconcepts are used to analyze the structures (basically)
In fact, except for special design considerations, the techniques used for
all structures are basically the same:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 3
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
4/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Possible considerationsStructure type
BuildingsShipsCarsSpace stationsAirplanes
The difference is often in the degree of refinement of the structuralanalysis (generally more refined in A & A!)
We will teach basic techniques and concepts and usespecific examples. But, the technique may apply to anotherstructural type as well.
Example: (aircraft to space station)Fuselage --> space station living habitat (pressurized cylinders)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 4
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
5/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Overview of Structural Design Process(Review from U.E.)
Purpose: Assure structural integrity while minimizing cost
In aerospace structures, cost often means weight.Why?
Saving a pound of weight means more- payload (extra passengers, more satellites)
- fuel (longer distance, longer duration via extendedstation keeping)
Amount industries (civilian) are willing to pay to save a pound of weight:Satellites $10,000 - $20,000 (w/o servicing)Transport Aircraft $100 - $200General Aircraft $25
Automobile
$0.00Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 5
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
6/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Sometimes willing to pay for performance
(military, FWCpolar orbit)Factors in determining cost
Material cost Waste amount Manufacturing Subassembly/assembly Durability and maintenance Useful life
An engineer must consider all these. In 16.20 we will focus onstructural integrity and methods to assess such.
Definition of structural integrity :
Capability of a structure to carry out the operation for which it wasdesigned.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
7/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Many aspects
Required loads Required deformations Corrosion resistance (e.g., no penetration on
pressure vessels)
Many aspects to failure (we will discuss later)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 7
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
8/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Design Process
5. Determine capability of structure to carry loads(of box 2) subject to design restrictions (of box 1)
4.
3.
size components
2. environment to which structure is subjected
1.
2
1
Manufacturing & Maintenanceconsidered throughout
Determine internal stresses and deflections
Layout structural arrangement, select materials,
Determine applied loads and operating
Design restrictions/specifications
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 8
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
9/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Iterative loops
Big loop 2 : May find there is no way to attain what was asked for
Loop 1 : Go through this all the time. Get more and more
specific on design each time- Use more refined techniques each time- Iterate to get most efficient structure
#1 usually given from above
#2 tells us what we need to considerin 16.20
Learn to do #4 and #5 Use knowledge attained in 16.20 and by doing
#4 a number of times to think about #3
Current use of IPTscustomers involved
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 1 - p. 9
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
10/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Unit 2
Loads and Design ConsiderationsReadings:
Rivello (Ch. 1)Cutler book (at leisure)G 7.1
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
11/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Sources of Stresses and Strains
Depends on type of structure
Aircraft Launch Vehicles Space Structures
General Other Considerations
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
12/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Can generally divide these into: Normal operational effects (regular use) Environmental effects (internal stresses, material property
degradation) Isolated effects (lightning, impact)
In a (large company) Design group does general management Loads group determines operating conditions This is passed on to stress group that analyzes stresses and
deformations Materials group provides material ultimates, etc. Need to understand each part
NOTE:
New approach in companies: IPT (IntegratedProduct Teams)
DBT (Design Build Teams) - people from eachbranch including manufacturing and marketing
even more important to understandvarious factors
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 3
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
13/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Factors, Margins, etc.
Two important definitions for static considerations
Limit Load/Stress/Condition: Maximum load/stress/condition wherestructure shows no permanent deformation.
Ultimate Load/Stress/Condition: Maximum load/stress/conditionwhere structure does not fail.
Definition is key; often defined asbreak (i.e., carry no more load)
Operationally, the limit load is the maximum load the structure is expectedto see
The ultimate load provides a factor of safety for unknownsUltimate Factor of Safety (U.F.S.) = Ultimate Load
Limit LoadThis is a design value
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 4
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
14/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
F.O.S. is also a Factor of Ignorance
This accounts for
probability & statistics
(also in material allowances)U.F.S. = 1.5 for Aircraft
1.25 for Spacecraft (unmanned)
Design is usually conservative and an additional Margin of Safety(M.O.S.) is used/results
Limit MOS = Tested Limit X - Limit XLimit X
Ultimate MOS = Tested Ultimate X - Ultimate XUltimate X
An MOS is an experimental reality.Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 5
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
15/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Try to minimize M.O.S.
- Too conservative
too heavy- Not conservative enough plane falls out of sky (thingshave flown with negative M.O.S.)
So, begin with operational envelope, the way the structure will be used Aircraft --> v-n diagram Spacecraft, etc.
Then add special conditions (gusts, etc.)
Also need to account for Environmental effects
- change in material properties- causes stresses and strains
Special conditions- Lightning
- Impact- etc.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
16/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Fatigue (cyclic loading)
- Effect on material properties- Damage growth
Example
A fighter aircraft has a gross take-off weight of 30,000 lbs. In a test of onewing, the wing fails at a total loading of 243,000 lbs. What is the marginof safety?
Definition of M.O.S. = Tested Ultimate - UltimateUltimate
We know: Tested Ultimate = 243,000 lbs.
(for one wing)How do we get the Design Ultimate?
Design Ultimate = Design Limit x Factor of Safety
For aircraft, F.O.S. = 1.5
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 7
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
17/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
How do we get the Design Limit?Use the v-n diagramFrom U.E., max n for fighter = 9 = limit n
(Note: n for level flight = 1 loading for level flight = weight)
Design Limit = nlimit
x weight= 9 x 30,000 lbs. = 270,000 lbs.
But , each wing carries 1/2 of this
Design limit load for one wing = 135,000 lbs.
Design ultimate load for one wing = 202,500 lbs.
Finally, M.O.S. = 243,000 lbs. - 202,500 lbs.202,500 lbs.
= 40,500 lbs. = 0.2 = M.O.S202,500 lbs.+ 20% margin
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 8
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
18/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
What is failure?
It depends on use..may be deflection based (CTE example).may be fracture.may be buckling
.
.
.
Overall, you must consider:Static Stresses
- Fracture- Yielding
- BucklingDeflections- Clearances- Flutter- Vibration- Tolerances (e.g., C. T. E.)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 9
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
19/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Life- Damage accumulation- Fatigue
For aircraft, design guidelines provided by FAA F.A.R.s (Federal AviationRegulations)
Part 23 Part 25 Part 27 Part 29
Aircraft Aircraft HelicopterUnder Above
14,000 lbs. 14,000 lbs.
USAF guidelines (e.g., Damage Tolerance Regulations)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 2 - p. 10
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
20/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Unit 3(Review of) Language of
Stress/Strain AnalysisReadings:
B, M, P A.2, A.3, A.6Rivello 2.1, 2.2T & G Ch. 1 (especially 1.7)
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
21/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Recall the definition of stress: = stress = intensity of internal force at a point
Figure 3.1 Representation of cross-section of a general body
Fn
F s
F Stress = lim A
A 0
There are two types of stress: n (F n) 1. Normal (or extensional): act normal to the plane of the
element s (F s) 2. Shear: act in-plane of element
Sometimes delineated as
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
22/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
And recall the definition of strain: = strain = percentage deformation of an infinitesimal element
Figure 3.2 Representation of 1-Dimensional Extension of a body
L = lim L
L 0
Again, there are two types of strain:n 1. Normal (or extensional): elongation of elements 2. Shear: angular change of element
Sometimes delineated as
Figure 3.3 Illustration of Shear Deformation
shear
deformation!Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 3
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
23/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Since stress and strain have components in several directions, we need anotation to represent these (as you learnt initially in Unified)
Several possible Tensor (indicial) notation Contracted notation will review here Engineering notation and give examples Matrix notation in recitation
IMPORTANT: Regardless of thenotation, the equations and conceptshave the same meaning learn, be comfortable with, be able to
use all notations
Tensor (or Summation) Notation Easy to write complicated formulae Easy to mathematically manipulate Elegant, rigorous Use for derivations or to succinctly express a set of equations or a long
equationPaul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 4
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
24/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Example: xi = fij y j
Rules for subscripts NOTE: index subscript Latin subscripts (m, n, p, q, ) take on the values 1, 2, 3 (3-D)
Greek subscripts ( , , ) take on the values 1, 2 (2-D)
When subscripts are repeated on one side of the equationwithin one term, they are called dummy indices and are to besummed on
Thus:3
fij y j = fij y j j=1
But fij y j + g i ... do not sum on i !
Subscripts which appear only once on the left side of the equationwithin one term are called free indices and represent a separateequation
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 5
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
25/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Thus:
xi = .. x1 = ..x2 = ..x3 = ..
Key Concept: The letters used forindices have no inherent meaning inand of themselves
Thus: x i = fij y j
is the same as: xr = frs y s or x j=
f y i ji
Now apply these concepts for stress/strain analysis:
1. Coordinate System
Generally deal with right-handed rectangular Cartesian: y m
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
26/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 3.4 Right-handed rectangular Cartesian coordinate systemy
3 , z
y2, y
Compare notations y1 , x
zy3
yy2
xy1
EngineeringTensor
Note: Normally this is so, but always checkdefinitions in any article, book, report, etc. Keyissue is self-consistency, not consistency with aworldwide standard (an official one does not
exist!)Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 7
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
27/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
2. Deformations/Displacements (3)
Figure 3.5 p(y 1, y 2, y 3),small p
(deformed position)P(Y 1, Y2, Y3)
Capital P(original position)
um = p(y m) - P(y m)
--> Compare notations
Tensor Engineering Direction inEngineering
u 1 u xu 2 v y
u 3 w z
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 8
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
28/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
3. Components of Stress (6)
mn Stress Tensor 2 subscripts 2nd order tensor6 independent components
Extensional
11 22 33
Note: stress tensor is symmetricmn = nm
Shear
12 = 21 23 = 32 13 = 31
due to equilibrium (moment) considerations
Meaning of subscripts: mnstress acts in n-direction
stress acts on facewith normal vector inthe m-direction
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 9
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
29/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 3.6 Differential element in rectangular system
NOTE: If face has a negative normal,positive stress is in negative direction
--> Compare notations
= yz sometimes= xz used for= xy shear stresses
Tensor Engineering 11 x 22 y
33 z 23 yz 13 xz 12 xy
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 10
MIT 16 20 ll
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
30/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
4. Components of Strain (6)
mn Strain Tensor2 subscripts 2nd order tensor
6 independent components
Extensional Shear112233
12 = 2123 = 3213 = 31
NOTE (again): strain tensor is symmetricmn = nm
due to geometrical considerations(from Unified)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 11
MIT 16 20 F ll 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
31/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Meaning of subscripts not like stress
mn m = n extension along mm n rotation in m-n plane
BIG DIFFERENCE for strain tensor:
There is a difference in the shear components ofstrain between tensor and engineering (unlikefor stress).
Figure 3.7 Representation of shearing of a 2-D element
angularchange
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 12
MIT - 16 20 Fall 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
32/531
MIT 16.20 Fall, 2002
--> total angular change = 12 = 12 + 21 = 2 12(recall that 12 and 21 are the same due to
geometrical considerations)But , engineering shear strain is the total
angle: 12 = xy = xy--> Compare notations
= yz sometimes= xz used for= xy shear strains
Thus, factor of 2 will pop upWhen we consider the equations of elasticity, the2 comes out naturally.
(But, remember this physical explanation)
Tensor Engineering11 x22 y
33 z223 = yz213 = xz2
12=
xy
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 13
MIT - 16.20 Fall 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
33/531
MIT 16.20 Fall, 2002
CAUTION When dealing with shear strains, must know if they aretensorial or engineeringDO NOT ASSUME!
5. Body Forces (3)fi internal forces act along axes
(resolve them in this manner -- can always dothat)
--> Compare notations
fzf3
fyf2
fxf1
EngineeringTensor
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 14
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
34/531
,
6. Elasticity Tensor (? will go over later)
Emnpq relates stress and strain(we will go over in detail, recall introduction in Unified)
Other Notations
Engineering Notation One of two most commonly used Requires writing out all equations (no shorthand) Easier to see all components when written out fully
Contracted Notation Other of two most commonly used Requires less writing
Often used with composites (reduces four subscripts onelasticity term to two) Meaning of subscripts not as physical Requires writing out all equations generally (there is contracted
shorthand)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 15
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
35/531
1
4
3
2
5
6
--> subscript changesTensor Engineering Contracted
11 x22 y
33 z
23, 32 yz13, 31 xz
12, 21 xy
--> Meaning of 4, 5, 6 in contracted notation Shear component Represents axis (x n) about which
shear rotation takes place via:
m = 3 + nmor xn m
Figure 3.8 Example:Rotation about y 3
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 16
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
36/531
Matrix notation
Super shorthand Easy way to represent system of equations Especially adaptable with indicial notation Very useful in manipulating equations (derivations, etc.)
Example: xi
= Aij
y j
x = A y~ ~ ~ ~ matrix (as underscore)
tildex1 A11 A12 A13 y1 x2 = A21 A22 A23 y2 x3 A31 A32 A33 y3
(will see a little of this mainly in 16.21)
KEY: Must be able to use various notations. Dont rely on
notation, understand concept that is represented.Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 3 - p. 17
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
37/531
Unit 4Equations of ElasticityReadings:R 2.3, 2.6, 2.8T & G 84, 85B, M, P 5.1-5.5, 5.8, 5.9
7.1-7.96.1-6.3, 6.5-6.7
Jones (as background on composites)
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
38/531
Lets first review a bit from Unified, saw that there are 3 basic considerations in elasticity:
1. Equilibrium2. Strain - Displacement3. Stress - Strain Relations (Constitutive Relations)
Consider each:1. Equilibrium (3)
F i = 0, Mi = 0
Free body diagrams Applying these to an infinitesimal element
yields 3 equilibrium equationsFigure 4.1 Representation of general infinitesimal
element
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 2
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
39/531
11 + 21 + 31 + f1 = 0 (4-1)y1 y2 y312 + 22 + 32 + f2 = 0 (4-2)y1 y2 y313 + 23 + 33 + f3 = 0 (4-3)y1 y2 y3
+ mnm
nyf 0=
2. Strain - Displacement (6)
Based on geometric considerations
Linear considerations ( I.e., small strains only -- we will talk aboutlarge strains later )(and infinitesimal displacements only)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 3
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
40/531
11 = u1 (4-4)y1
22 = u2 (4-5)y2
33 = u3
(4-6)y3
21 = 12 = 1 u1 + u2 2 y2 y1
31 = 13 = 1 u1 + u3 2 y3 y1
32 = 23 = 1 u
2 + u3
2 y3 y2
(4-7)
(4-8)
(4-9)
1 um + unmn = 2 yn ym
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 4
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
41/531
3. Stress - Strain (6)
mn = Emnpq pqwell come back to this
Lets review the 4th important concept:
Static DeterminanceThere are there possibilities (as noted in U.E.)
a. A structure is not sufficiently restrained(fewer reactions than d.o.f.)
degrees offreedom
DYNAMICSb. Structure is exactly (or simply) restrained
(# of reactions = # of d.o.f.) STATICS (statically
determinate)Implication: can calculate stresses via
equilibrium ( as done in Unified )Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 5
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
42/531
c. Structure is overrestrained(# reactions > # of d.o.f.)
STATICALLYINDETERMINATE
must solve for reactionssimultaneously with stresses, strains, etc.
in this case, you must employ the stress-strain equations
--> Overall, this yields for elasticity:
15 unknowns and 15 equations6 strains = mn 3 equilibrium ( )6 stresses = mn 6 strain-displacements ( )3 displacements = u m 6 stress-strain ( - )
IMPORTANT POINT:The first two sets of equations are universal (independent of thematerial) as they depend on geometry (strain-displacement) andequilibrium (equilibrium). Only the stress-strain equations are
dependent on the material.Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 6
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
43/531
One other point: Are all these equations/unknowns independent? NO
Why? --> Relations between the strains and displacements (due togeometrical considerations result in the Strain Compatibility Equations(as you saw in Unified)
General form is:
2nk + 2m l 2n l
2mk = 0y y l yk y yk y lm yn m yn
This results in 6 strain-compatibility (in 3-D).
What a mess!!!What do these really tell us???
The strains must be compatible, they cannot be prescribed inan arbitrary fashion.
Lets consider an example:
Step 1: consider how shear strain ( 12) is related to displacement:
1 u1 u2
+ 12 = 2 y2 y1
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 7
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
44/531
Note that deformations (u m) must be continuoussingle-valued functions for continuity. (or itdoesnt make physical sense!)
Step 2: Now consider the case where there are gradients in the strainfield
12 0, 12 0y1 y2This is the most general case and most likely in a generalstructure
Take derivatives on both sides:212 1
3u1 3u2
= 2 + 2y y2 2
y y2 y y2
1 1 1
Step 3: rearrange slightly and recall other strain-displacementequations
u1 = 1 ,u2 2= y1 y2
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 8
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
2 2 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
45/531
212 1
211 + 222
= 2y y2 2 y2 y1
21
So, the gradients in strain are related in certain ways sincethey are all related to the 3 displacements.
Same for other 5 cases
Lets now go back and spend time with the
Stress-Strain Relations and the ElasticityTensor
In Unified, you saw particular examples of this, but we now want togeneralize it to encompass all cases.
The basic relation between force and displacement (recall 8.01) is HookesLaw:
F = kxspring constant (linear case)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 9
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
If thi i t d d t th th di i l d li d
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
46/531
If this is extended to the three-dimensional case and applied overinfinitesimal areas and lengths, we get the relation between stress and
strain known as:Generalized Hookes law:
mn = Emnpq pq
where E mnpq is the elasticity tensor
How many components does this appear to have?m, n, p, q = 1, 2, 3
3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 81 componentsBut there are several symmetries:
1. Since mn = nm (energy considerations)
E mnpq = E nmpq(symmetry in switching first two
indices)2. Since pq = qp (geometrical considerations)
E mnpq = E mnqpPaul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 10
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
47/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
R l i 21 i d d f h l i i
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
48/531
Results in 21 independent components of the elasticity tensor Along diagonal (6) Upper right half of matrix (15)
[dont worry about 2s]
Also note : 2s come out automaticallydont put them in ~For example: 12 = E 1212 12 + E 1221 21
= 2E 1212 12
These E mnpq can be placed into 3 groups: Extensional strains to extensional stresses
E1111
E1122
E 2222 E1133E 3333 E 2233
e.g., 11 = E 1122 22 Shear strains to shear stresses
E1212 E1213E1313 E1323E 2323 E 2312
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 12
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
e g = 2E
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
49/531
e.g., 12 2E 1223 23 Coupling term: extensional strains to shear stress or
shear strains to extensional stressesE1112 E2212 E3312E1113 E2213 E 3313E
1123E
2223E
3323e.g., 12 = E 1211 11
11 = 2E 1123 23
A material which behaves in this
manner is fully anisotropicHowever, there are currently no useful engineering materials whichhave 21 different and independent components of E mnpq
The type of material (with regard to elastic behavior) dictates the numberof independent components of E mnpq :
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 13
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
50/531
2Isotropic
3Cubic
5Transversely Isotropic*
6Tetragonal
9Orthotropic
13Monoclinic
21Anisotropic
# of IndependentComponents of E mnpq
Material Type
UsefulEngineering
Materials
CompositeLaminates
Basic
CompositePly
Metals(on average)
Good Reference: BMP, Ch. 7*not in BMP
For orthotropic materials (which is as complicated as we usually get),there are no coupling terms in the principal axes of the material
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 14
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
When you apply an extensional stress no shear strains arise
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
51/531
When you apply an extensional stress, no shear strains arisee.g., E 1112 = 0
(total of 9 terms are now zero) When you apply a shear stress, no extensional strains arise
(some terms become zero as forprevious condition)
Shear strains (stresses) in one plane do not cause shear strains(stresses) in another plane
( E 1223 , E 1213 , E 1323 = 0)
With these additional terms zero, we end up with 9 independentcomponents:
(21 - 9 - 3 = 9)
and the equations are:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 15
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
11 E1111 E1122 E1133 0 0 0 11
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
52/531
13
11 E1111 E1122 E1133 0 0 0 11 E1122 E 2222 E 2233 0 0 0
22
22
33 E1133 E 2233 E 3333 0 0 0 33 = 23
0 0 0 2E 2323 0 0 23 13 0 0 0 0 2E 1313 0 13
12
0 0 0 0 0 2E 1212 12 For other cases, no more terms become zero, but the terms are notIndependent.
For example, for isotropic materials: E1111 = E 2222 = E 3333 E1122 = E 1133 = E 2233 E2323 = E 1313 = E 1212 And there is one other equation relating E 1111 , E 1122 and E 2323
2 independent components of E mnpq(well see this more when we do engineering constants)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 16
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Why then do we bother with anisotropy?
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
53/531
Why, then, do we bother with anisotropy?Two reasons:
1. Someday, we may have useful fully anisotropic materials(certain crystals now behave that way) Also, 40-50 years ago,people only worried about isotropy
2. It may not always be convenient to describe a structure (i.e.,write the governing equations) along the principal material axes.
How else?Loading axes
ExamplesFigure 4-2
wing
rocket case fuselage
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 17
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
In these other axis systems, the material may have more elastic
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
54/531
In these other axis systems, the material may have more elasticcomponents. But it really doesnt.
(you cant create elastic components just by describing a material ina different axis system, the inherent properties of the material stay thesame).
Figure 4-3 Example: Unidirectional composite (transversely isotropic)
No shear / extension coupling Shears with regard to loadingaxis but still no inherentshear/extension coupling
In order to describe full behavior, need to doTRANSFORMATIONS
(well review this/expand on it later)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 18
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
--> It is often useful to consider the relationship between
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
55/531
pstress and strain (opposite way). For this we use
COMPLIANCE
mn = S mnpq pqwhere: S mnpq = compliance tensor
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 19
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
56/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Meaning of each:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
57/531
Elasticity term E mnpq : amount of stress ( mn ) related to thedeformation/strain ( pq )
Compliance term S mnpq : amount of strain ( mn ) the stress ( pq )causes
These are useful in defining/ determining the engineering constants
All of this presentation on elasticity (and what you had inUnified ) is based on assumptions which limit their
applicability:
which we will review / introduce / expand on in the next lecture.
CAUTION
Small strain Small displacement / infinitesimal (linear) strain
Fortunately, most engineering structures are such that these assumptionscause negligible error.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 21
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
However, there are cases where this is not true:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
58/531
Manufacturing (important to be able to convince)
Compliant materials Structural examples: dirigibles,
So lets explore:
Large strain and the formal definition of strainWhat we defined before are the physical manifestation of strain /
deformation Relative elongation Angular rotation
Strain is formally defined by considering the diagonal length of a cube:Figure 4-4 undeformed x3
(small letters)
x2
Paul A. Lagace 2001 x1 Unit 4 - p. 22
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
and looking at the change in length under general (and possibly large)d f
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
59/531
deformation:
Figure 4-5 deformed(capital letters) x3
x2
x1
The formal definition of the strain tensor is:
2 22 mn dxm dxn = (dS ) - (ds )
2 11 dx1 dx1 + 2 22 dx 2 dx 2 + 2d 33 dx 3 dx 3+ 2( 12 + 21) dx1 dx 2 + 2( 13 + 31) dx1 dx 3
2 2+ 2( 23 + 32 ) dx 2 dx 3 = (dS ) (ds )
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 23
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
where mn = formal strain tensor.
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
60/531
This is a definition . The physical interpretation is related tothis but not directly in the general case.
One can show (see BMP 5.1 - 5.4) that the formal strain tensor is relatedto relative elongation (the familiar l ) via:
l
relative elongation in m-direction:
Em = m1 m+ 2 1 (no summation on m)
and is related to angular change via:2 mnsin = mn (1 + Em ) (1 + En )
Thus, it also involves the relative elongations!
Most structural cases deal with relatively small strain. If the relativeelongation is small (
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
61/531
Em = 1 + 2 mm 1
2 (Em + 1) = 1 + 2 mm
E 2 + 2E m = 2 mmm
but if E m
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
62/531
2 mnsin
= mn (1 + Em ) (1 + En )
for small elongations (E m
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
63/531
consider
Large Displacement and Non-Infinitesimal(Non-linear) Strain
See BMP 5.8 and 5.9The general strain-displacement relation is:
1 u u u u mn = m + n + r s rs2
xn
xm
xm
xn
Where:rs = Kronecker delta
The latter terms are important for larger displacements but are higher
order for small displacements and can then be ignored to arrive backat:
1 um + unmn = 2 yn ym
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 27
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
How to assess?L k
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
64/531
Look at
um ur u svs. rsxn xm xnand compare magnitudes
Small vs. large and linear vs. nonlinear will depend on: material(s) structural configuration mode of behavior the loading
Examples Rubber in inflated structures
Large strain (Note : generally means larger displacement) Diving board of plastic or wood
Small strain but possibly large displacement (will look at thismore when we deal with beams)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 28
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Floor beam of steelS ll t i d li t i (N t li t i t l b
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
65/531
Small strain and linear strain (Note: linear strain must also be small)
Nextback to constitutive constantsnow their physicalreality
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 4 - p. 29
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
66/531
Unit 5Engineering Constants
Readings:Rivello 3.1 - 3.5, 3.9, 3.11
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
We do not characterize materials by their E mnpq . The E mnpq areuseful in doing transformations manipulations etc
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
67/531
useful in doing transformations, manipulations, etc.
We characterize materials by theirENGINEERING CONSTANTS
(or , Elastic Constants)
(what we can physically measure)
There are 5 types
1. Longitudinal (Youngs) (Extensional) Modulus: relates
extensional strain in the direction of loading to stress in thedirection of loading.
(3 of these)
2. Poissons Ratio: relates extensional strain in the loadingdirection to extensional strain in another direction.
(6 of theseonly 3 are independent)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 2
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
3. Shear Modulus: relates shear strain in the plane of shearloading to that shear stress.
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
68/531
g
(3 of these)
4. Coefficient of Mutual Influence: relates shear strain due to shearstress in that plane to extensional strain or , relates extensional
strain due to extensional stress to shear strain.(up to 18 of these)
5. Chentsov Coefficient: relates shear strain due to shear stress in
that plane to shear strain in another plane.(6 of these)
Lets be more specific:
1. Longitudinal Modulus1) E 11 or E xx or E 1 or E x: contribution of 11 to 112) E 22 or E yy or E 2 or E y: contribution of 22 to 223) E 33 or E zz or E 3 or E z: contribution of 33 to 33
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 3
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
In general: Emm = mm due to mm applied onlymm
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
69/531
mm
(no summation on m)
2. Poissons Ratios ( negative ratios)1) 12 or xy: (negative of) ratio of 22 to 11 due to 11
2) 13 or xz: (negative of) ratio of 33 to 11 due to 113) 23 or yz: (negative of) ratio of 33 to 22 due to 224) 21 or yx: (negative of) ratio of 11 to 22 due to 225) 31 or zx: (negative of) ratio of 11 to 33 due to 336) 32 or zy: (negative of) ratio of 22 to 33 due to 33
In general: nm = mm due to nn applied onlynn
(for n m)
Important: nm mn
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 4
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
However, these are not all independent. There are relationsknown as reciprocity relations (3 of them)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
70/531
p y ( )
21 E11 = 12 E 22
31 E11 = 13 E 33
32 E 22 = 23 E33
3. Shear Moduli1) G 12 or G xy or G 6: contribution of (2) 12 to 122) G 13 or G xz or G 5: contribution of (2) 13 to 133) G 23 or G yz or G 4: contribution of (2) 23 to 23
In general: Gmn = mn due to mn applied only 2mn
factor of 2 here since it relates physical quantitiesshear stress mn
Gmn = shear deformation (angular charge) mn
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 5
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
4. Coefficients of Mutual Influence ( negative ratios)(also known as coupling coefficients)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
71/531
Note: need to use contracted notation here:1) 16 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 12 to 11 due to 11
2) 61 : (negative of) ratio of 11 to (2) 12 due to 12
3) 26 (5) 36 (7) 14 (9) 24
4) 62 (6) 63 (8) 41 (10) 42
11) 34 (13) 15 (15) 25 (17) 35
12) 43 (14) 51 (16) 52 (18) 53
5. Chentsov Coefficients ( negative ratios)1) 46 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 12 to (2) 23 due to 232) 64 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 23 to (2) 12 due to 12
3) 45 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 13 to (2) 23 due to 234) 54 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 23 to (2) 13 due to 135) 56 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 12 to (2) 13 due to 136) 65 : (negative of) ratio of (2) 13 to (2) 12 due to 12
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
72/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
in general:
E G
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
73/531
nm Em = mn Gn(m = 1, 2, 3) no sum
(n = 4, 5, 6)
and
46 G6 = 64 G445 G5 = 54 G456 G6 = 65 G5
in general:
nm Gm = mn Gn(m = 4, 5, 6) no sum
(m n)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 8
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
This gives 21 independent (at most)engineering constants:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
74/531
Total 3 E n 6 nm 3 G m 18 nm 6 nm
Indpt.: 3 3 3 9 3 = 21
--> Now that we have defined the terms, we wish to write theengineering stress-strain equations
Recall compliances:
mn = S mnpq pq
and consider only the first equation:
11 = S 1111 11+ 2S 1123
1 = S 11 1 +
Paul A. Lagace 2001
+ S 1122 22 + S 1133 33
23 + 2S 1113 13 + 2S 1112 12(well have to use contracted notation, so)
S 12 2 + S 13 3 + S 14 4 + S 15 5 + S 16 6(Note: 2s disappear!)
Unit 5 - p. 9
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Consider each of the compliance terms separately:
Case 1: Only 11 applied
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
75/531
1 = S 11 1and we know
E1 = 1 due to 1 only11 S 11 = E1
Case 2: Only 22 applied1 = S 12 2
We need two steps here.The direct relation to 2 is from 2:
E 2 = 2 due to 2 only2
and we know21 =
1 due to 2 only2
2 = E 2 due to 2 only
1 21Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 10
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Thus:S 12 =
21 (due to 2 only)E 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
76/531
E 2--> to make this a bit simpler (for later purposes), we recall the reciprocity
relation:12 E 2 = 21 E1
21
12 = E2 E1
Thus:
S 12 = 12E1
Case 3: Only 3 appliedIn a similar manner we get:
S 13 = 13
E1Case 4: Only 4 ( 23) applied
1 = S 14 4Again, two steps are needed.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 11
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
77/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
get:S 15 =
15E1
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
78/531
E1and
S 16 = 16E1
With all this we finally get:1 14 4 5 6 ]1 = E1
[1 12 2 13 3 15 16
we used the reciprocity relations so
we could pull out this commonfactor.
We can do this for all the other cases.In general we write:
1 6n m = 1
Note: nn = -1
If we let s be sPaul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 13
n = E nm m
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Engineering Stress-Strain Equations
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
79/531
General Form11 = E1
[1 12 2 13 3 15 1614 4 5 6 ]
1
2=
E 2 [ 21 1+
2 23 3 4 5 6 ]
24 25 26
13 = E 3[31 1 2 + 3 34 4 35 5 36 6 ] 32
1 4 = 4 = G4 [41 1 42 2 43 3 + 4 45 5 46 6 ]
1 5 = 5 = G5[51 1 52 2 53 3 54 4 + 5 56 6 ]
1 6 = 6 = G6 [ 1 62 2 63 3 64 4 65 5 + 6 ] 61
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 14
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
In general:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
80/531
1 6n = E nm mn m = 1Note: nn = -1 s --> s
We have developed these for a fully anisotropic material. Again,there are currently no useful engineering materials of this nature.Thus, these would need to be reduced accordingly.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 15
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Orthotropic Case:In material principal axes, there is no coupling between extension and
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
81/531
shear and no coupling between planes of shear, so:all mn = 0
Thus, only the following constants remain:E
1
12,
21G
12E2 13 , 31 G13E3 23 , 32 G23
3 + 3 + 3 = 9(same as E mnpq, better be! )
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 16
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
So the six equations become:
11 = [1 12 2 13 3 ]
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
82/531
1E1
[ 1 12 2 13 3 ]
12 = E2[ 21 1 + 2 23 3 ]
13 = E 3[31 1 32 2 + 3 ]
14 = 4G23
15 = 5G13
16 = 6G12
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 17
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
matrix form:
1 1 12 13 0 0 0 1
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
83/531
0
1 E1 E1 E1 2
21E1
2 23 0 0 0 2
E 2 E 2 3 31 32 1 0 0 0
3
= E 3 E 3 E 3 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 G23 1 5 0 0 0 0
G130 5
1 0 0 0 0 0 G12 66
= S ~ ~ ~this is, in fact, the compliance matrix
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 18
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Thus: If we know the engineering constants (through tests -- this is
upcoming)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
84/531
Relate engineering constants to S mnpq
Get Emnpq by inversion of S mnpq matrix (combine steps to directlyget relationships between E mnpq and the engineering constants)
Isotropic CaseAs we noted in the last unit, as we get to materials with less elasticconstants (< 9) than an orthotropic material, we no longer have any morezero terms in the elasticity or compliance matrix, but more nonzero terms
are related.For the isotropic case:
All extensional moduli are the same:E1 = E 2 = E 3 = E
All Poissons ratios are the same: 12 = 21 = 13 = 31 = 23 = 32 =
All shear moduli are the same:G
4 = G
5 = G
6 = G
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 19
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
And, there is a relationship between E, and G (from Unified):E
G = +
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
85/531
2 1 )(Thus, there are only 2 independentconstants.
We now have all the relationships to do the manipulations,but we need to measure the basic properties. We musttherefore talk about
TestingTesting is used for a variety of purposes.
Depending on the purpose, the technique and care will vary. The
fidelity needed in the testing depends on the use.Basically, apply a load (stress) condition and measure appropriateresponses:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 20
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Strain
Displacements
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
86/531
Failure(or maybe vice versa)
Concerns in test specimens Boundary conditions and introduction of load
Stress concentrations
Achievement of desired stress state
Cost and ease of use also important (again, depends onuse of test)
Many of these concerns will depend on the material / configuration andload condition. This generally involves issues of scale.
Properties of a material / structure depends on the scale at which youlook at it.
Scale level of homogenization (average behavior over a certainsize)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 21
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Example 1: Atoms make up a materialFigure 5.1 Representation of atomic bonding as springs
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
87/531
The behavior of the materials is some combination of theatoms and their bonds.
Example 2: CompositeFigure 5.2 Representation of unidirectional composite
fibers in a matrix
Fibers and matrix respond differently. Average theirresponse to get composite properties
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 22
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
88/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
89/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 5.4 Tension specimens
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
90/531
Tapered Dogbone Straight-edged couponBar Specimen (composites) stressconcentration problem
2. CompressionSimilar specimens can be used, but must beware of buckling(global and local instabilities)
Possibility of local reinforcement to prevent buckling.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 25
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
3. ShearVery hard to apply pure shear.
Figure 5 5 P ibl h i
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
91/531
Figure 5.5 Possible shear specimens
Tube
Iosipescu
(beam theory shows area ofpure shear -- test section)
Refer to: ASTM (American Society for Testingand Materials) Annual Book of Standards
Voluntary test standards are contained there.Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 26
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
what to do with test dataTest data must be reduced to give the engineeringconstants.
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
92/531
Figure 5.6 Typical stress-strain data (for ductile material)
The engineering constants are defined (somewhat
arbitrary) as various parts of this curve. Generally withinthe initial linear region.
Often use linear regression
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 27
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
93/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
We have now developed the general 3-D stress-strain relations. But weoften deal with a problem where we can simplify (model as) to a 2-Dsystem. Two important cases to next consider:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
94/531
Plane Stress
Plane Strain
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 5 - p. 29
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
95/531
Unit 6 Plane Stress and Plane Strain
Readings:T & G 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
There are many structural configurations where we do nothave to deal with the full 3-D case.
First lets consider the models
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
96/531
First let s consider the models Lets then see under what conditions we can
apply them
A. Plane Stress
This deals with stretching and shearing of thin slabs.Figure 6.1
Representation of Generic Thin Slab
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 2
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
The body has dimensions such thath
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
97/531
consider later)
Thus, the plate is thin enough such that there is no variation ofdisplacement (and temperature) with respect to y 3 (z).
Furthermore, stresses in the z-direction are zero (small order ofmagnitude).
Figure 6.2 Representation of Cross-Section of Thin Slab
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 3
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Thus, we assume: zz = 0
yz = 0
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
98/531
0 xz = 0
= 0z
So the equations of elasticity reduce to:
Equilibrium
11 + 21 + f1
= 0 (1)y1 y2
12 + 22 + f2 = 0 (2)y1 y2
(3rd equation is an identity) 0 = 0(f3 = 0)In general: + f = 0y
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 4
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Stress-Strain (fully anisotropic)Primary (in-plane) strains
11 = [ 1 12 2 16 6 ] (3)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
99/531
1 E 1[ 1 12 2 16 6 ] (3)
1 2 = E
2
[ 21 1 + 2 26 6 ] (4)
16 = G6
[61 1 62 2 + 6 ] (5)
Invert to get:*
= E
Secondary (out-of-plane) strains
(they exist, but they are not a primary part of the problem)13 = E 3
[ 311 32 2 36 6 ]
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 5
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
14 = G4[ 41 1 42 2 46 6 ]
1 = [ ]
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
100/531
5 = G5[51 1 52 2 56 6 ]
Note: can reduce these for orthotropic, isotropic(etc.) as before.
Strain - DisplacementPrimary
11 = u1 (6)y1
22 = u2 (7)y2
12 = 1
u1
+ u2
(8)2 y2 y1
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
101/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
This further implies from above(since = 0 )
y3No in-plane variation
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
102/531
pu3 = 0y
but this is not exactly true
INCONSISTENCY
Why? This is an idealized model and thus an approximation. Thereare, in actuality, triaxial ( zz , etc.) stresses that we ignore here as
being small relative to the in-plane stresses!(we will return to try to define small)
Final note: for an orthotropic material, write the tensorialstress-strain equation as:
2-D plane stress = ( , , , , = 1 2)
E
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 8
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
103/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 6.3 Representation of Long Prismatic Body
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
104/531
Dimension in z - direction is much, much larger than inthe x and y directions
L >> x, y
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 10
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
(Key again: where are limits to >>??? wellconsider later)
Since the body is basically infinite along z, the important loads are in thex - y plane (none in z) and do not change with z:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
105/531
x y plane (none in z) and do not change with z:
= = 0
y3 z
This implies there is no gradient in displacement along z, so (excludingrigid body movement):
u3 = w = 0
Equations of elasticity become:
Equilibrium:Primary
11 + 21 + f1 = 0 (1)y1 y2
12 + 22 + f2 = 0 (2)y1 y2Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 11
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Secondary13 + 23 + f3 = 0y
1y
2 13 and 23 exist but do not enter into primary
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
106/531
13 23 p yconsideration
Strain - Displacement
11 = u1 (3)y1
22 = u2 (4)y2
12 = 1 u1 + u2
(5)
2 y2 y1
Assumptions
= 0, w = 0
give:y3
13 = 23 = 33 = 0(Plane strain)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 12
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Stress - Strain(Do a similar procedure as in plane stress)
3 Primary11 = (6)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
107/531
11 ... (6) 22 = ... (7)12 = ... (8)
Secondary13 = 0 23 = 0
orthotropic ( 0 for anisotropic)
33 0INCONSISTENCY: No load along z,
yet 33 ( zz) is non zero.
Why? Once again, this is an idealization. Triaxial strains ( 33 )actually arise.
You eliminate 33 from the equation set by expressing it in terms of via ( 33 ) stress-strain equation.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 6 - p. 13
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
SUMMARY Plane Stress Plane Strain
length (y 3) >> in-planedimensions (y 1 y2)
thickness (y 3)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
108/531
Eliminate 33
from eq.Set by using 33 - eq. and expressing 33in terms of
Eliminate 33
from eq. setby using 33 = 0 - eq.and expressing 33 interms of
Note:
3333, u 3SecondaryVariable(s):
, , u , , u PrimaryVariables:
i3 = 0 i3 = 0ResultingAssumptions:
only
/ y3 = 0
33
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
109/531
Figure 6.4 Pressure vessel (fuselage, space habitat) Skin
in order of 70 MPa(10 ksi)
p o 70 kPa (~ 10 psi for living environment) zz
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
110/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
111/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
112/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
113/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
114/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
115/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Problem: get expressions for (whatever) in one axis system in terms of(whatever) in another axis system
(Review from Unified)
Recall: nothing is inherentlychanging, we just describe a body
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
116/531
from a different reference.
Use ~ (tilde) to indicate transformed axis system.Figure 7.2 General rotation of 3-D rectangular axis system
(still rectangular cartesian)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 3
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Define this transformation via direction cosines
~~l mn = cosine of angle from y m to y n
Notes: by convention, angle is measured positivecounterclockwise (+ CCW)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
117/531
counterclockwise (+ CCW)(not needed for cosine)
~ ~ since cos is an even functionl mn = l nmcos ( ) = cos (- )(reverse direction)
~ ~But
lmn
lmn
angle differs by 2 !
The order of a tensor governs the transformation needed. An n th ordertensor requires an n th order transformation (can prove by showing link of
order of tensor to axis system via governing equations).
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 4
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
118/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
119/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
120/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Not only do we sometimes want to change the orientation ofthe axes we use to describe a body, but we find it more
convenient to describe a body in a coordinate system otherthan rectangular cartesian. Thus, consider
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
121/531
Other Coordinate Systems
The easiest case isCylindrical (or Polar in 2-D) coordinates
Figure 7.3 Loaded disk
Figure 7.4 Stress around a hole
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 8
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 7.5 Shaft
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
122/531
Define the point p by a different set of coordinates other than y 1, y2, y 3
Figure 7.6 Polar coordinate representation
Volume = rd drdz
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 9
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Use , r, z where:y1 = r cos
y2 = rsin
y3 = zare the mapping functions
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
123/531
are the mapping functionsNow the way we describe stresses, etc. change
--> Differential element is now differentRectangular cartesian
Figure 7.7 Differential element in rectangular cartesian system
Volume = dy 1 dy 2 dy 3
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 10
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
CylindricalFigure 7.8 Differential element in cylindrical system
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
124/531
Volume = rd drdz
Generally:dy1 --> drdy2 --> rd dy3 --> dz (get from mapping functions)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 7 - p. 11
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
125/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
126/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
(engineering shear strains)
r = u + 1 ur u r r r
z = 1 u3 + u r z
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
127/531
r z
zr
= ur + u3z r
Stress - Strain Equations become, however, more complicated and noteasy to map into another coordinate systems.
Why? Unless the material is isotropic, the properties change withdirection (if the material principal axes are rectangular orthogonal).
Emnpq = l l qu E rstumr ns l pt l So, for cylindrical coordinates:
Emnpq ( )
a function of
Paul A. Lagace 2001Unit 7 - p. 14
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
128/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
129/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
For cylindrical case: = r =
= zactual mapping functions:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
130/531
actual mapping functions:
F y 11 ( , y 2 , y 3 ) = y22y1
2+
2 ( ,F y y 2 , y 3 ) = tan-1 (y2 / y1)1
F y y 2 , y 3 ) = y33 ( ,1Other cases
Lets next consider some general solution approaches
Paul A. Lagace 2001Unit 7 - p. 17
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Unit 8Solution Procedures
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
131/531
Readings:R Ch. 4T & G 17, Ch. 3 (18-26)
Ch. 4 (27-46)Ch. 6 (54-73)
Paul A. Lagace, Ph.D.Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics
and Engineering Systems
Paul A. Lagace 2001
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
132/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Lets consider exact techniques. A common, and classic, one is:
Stress Functions
Relate six stresses to (fewer) functions defined in such a mannerh h id i ll i f h ilib i di
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
133/531
that they identically satisfy the equilibrium conditon Can be done for 3-D case Can be done for anisotropic (most often orthotropic) case
--> See: Lekhnitskii, Anisotropic Plates,Gordan & Breach, 1968.
--> Lets consider plane stress (eventually) isotropic
8 equations in 8 unknowns
- 2 equilibrium - 3 strains- 3 strain-displacement - 2 displacements- 3 stress-strain - 3 stresses
Paul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 3
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
134/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
135/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
136/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
137/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Step 2: Use these in the plane stress compatibility equation:
2xx 2yy
2xy+ =
x yy2
x2
(E6)
we get quite a mess! After some rearranging andmanipulation, this results in:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
138/531
p ,
V V
+
+
=
( )
+ ( )
( )
+
4
4
4
2
2
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
21
x y y
ET
xT
y y
2
2
x
x
(*)
temperature term wehavent yet considered
= coefficient of thermal expansionT = temperature differential
This is the basic equation for isotropic planestress in Stress Function form
Recall : is a scalarPaul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 8
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
139/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
this function, and accompanying governing equation, couldbe defined in any curvilinear system (well see one suchexample later) and in plane strain as well.
Butwhats this all useful for???This may all seem like magic. Why were the s assumed as theywere?
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
140/531
were?
This is not a direct solution to a posed problem, per se , but is knownas
The Inverse Method
In general, for cases of plane stress without body force or temp ( 4 = 0):1. A stress function (x, y) is assumed that satisfies the
biharmonic equation2. The stresses are determined from the stress function as
defined in equations (8-1) - (8-3)3. Satisfy the boundary conditions (of applied tractions)4. Find the ( structural ) problem that this satisfies
Paul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 10
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
141/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
142/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
(Rule of Thumb) Generally, the area where specificsare important extends into the body for a distance equalto about the greatest linear dimension of the portion of
the surface on which the loading / B.C. occurs. This allows us to get solutions for most parts of a
structure via such a method.
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
143/531
But failure often originates/occurs in a region of load
introduction/boundary condition(example: where do nailed/screwed boards
break?)
Examples (for stress functions)
Example 1 (assume T = 0, V = 0 [no body forces])Pick = C 1 y2
this satisfies 4 = 0C1 is a constantwill be determined by satisfying the
B.C.sPaul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 13
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Using the definitions:
2 xx = 2 = 2C 1y
2 = = 0yy
x2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
144/531
= 0xy
gives the state of stress
What problem does this solve???
Uniaxial loadingFigure 8.1 Representation of Uniaxial Plane Stress Loading
applied stress (uniformstress on end)
Paul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 14
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Check the B.C.s:@ x = l , 0
xx =
o =
2C 1
C1 = o
2 = 0xy
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
145/531
@ y = w2
= 0yy = 0xy
Thus: =
o y22
Paul A. Lagace 2001
Unit 8 - p. 15
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
146/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 8.2 Representation of uniaxial test specimen and resultantstress state
x
y
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
147/531
These grips allow no displacement in the y-direction
--> v = 0 both @ x = 0, lThe solution gives:
v = y 0 in general @ x = 0, l
E
But , far from the effects of load introduction, the solution holds.Near the grips, biaxial stresses arise. Often failure occurs here.(Note : not in a pure uniaxial field. This is a common problem with testspecimens.)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 17
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Example 2
Lets now get a bit more involved and consider the
Stress Distribution Around a HoleFigure 8.3 Configuration of uniaxially loaded plate with a hole
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
148/531
Large (infinite) plate subjected to uniform far - field tension
Since the local specific of interest is a circle, it makes sense to usepolar coordinates.
By using the transformations to polar coordinates of Unit #7, we find:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 18
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
1 1 2 rr = r r+
r2 2+ V
2
+ V = r2
1 2 1 + r = 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
149/531
r r r r2
These are, again, defined such that equilibrium equations areautomatically satisfied.
where: fr = V
f = 1 V
r r
f + f 1 frand V exists if: =r r r
The governing equation is again:
4 = E 2 (T) (1 )2 V for plane stress, isotropic
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 19
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
150/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Step 2: Determine stressesPerforming the derivatives from the - relations in polar coordinatesresults in:
rr =B
20 + 2C 0 + 2A 2
6B4
2 4D 2 cos2 r r r 2
B0 2C 2A6B 2 12C 2 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
151/531
= 20 + 2C 0 + 2A 2 + 4
2 + 12C 2r2
cos2
r r
2 in r = 2A 2 6B
42 + 6C 2r
2 2D 2 s 2 r rNote that we have a term involving r 2. As r gets larger, the stresseswould become infinite. This is not possible. Thus, the coefficient C 2must be zero:
C2 = 0
So we have five constants remaining:A2, B 0, B2, C 0, D 2
we find these by
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 21
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
152/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
153/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
154/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 8.5 Stress condition at boundary of hole
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
155/531
So we (summarizing) appear to have 4 B. C.s: rr = o + o cos2 @ r = 2 2
r = o sin2 @ r = 2
rr = 0 @ r = a
r = 0 @ r = a
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 25
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
156/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 8.6 Polar coordinate configuration for uniaxially loaded platewith center hole
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
157/531
So we have the solution to find the stress field around a hole. Letsconsider one important point. Wheres the largest stress?
At the edge of the hole. Think of flow around the hole:
Figure 8.7 Representation of stress flow around a hole
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 27
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
@ = 90, r = a
a 2 a 4o = xx = 2
o 1 + a
2
2
1 + 3a
4 (1)
= 3 o
Define the:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
158/531
Stress Concentration Factor (SCF) = local stressfar - field stress
SCF = 3 at hole in isotropic plate
The SCF is a more general concept. Generally the sharper thediscontinuity, the higher the SCF.
The SCF will also depend on the material. For orthotropic materials, itdepends on E x and E y getting higher as E x /E y increases. In a uni-directionalcomposite, can have SCF = 7.
Can do stress functions for orthotropic materials, but need to go tocomplex variable mapping
--> (See Lekhnitskii as noted earlier)Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 8 - p. 28
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
159/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
160/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
161/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
162/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
If these thermal expansions / contractions are resisted by some means,then thermal stresses can arise. However , thermal stresses is amisnomer, they are really
stresses due to thermal effects -- stresses are alwaysmechanical(well see this via an example)
--> Consider a 3-D generic material.
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
163/531
Then we can write:T ij = ij T (9 1)
i, j = 1, 2, 3 (as before)
ij = 2nd order tensorThe total strain of a material is the sum of the mechanical strain and thethermal strain .
mechanical
thermalM T ij = ij + ij (9 2)
totalPaul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 3
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
(actual) total strain ( ij): that which you actually measure; thephysical deformation of the part
T thermal strain ( ij ): directly caused by temperature differencesM
mechanical strain ( ij ): that part of the strain which is directlyrelated to the stress
Relation of mechanical strain to stress is:M = S
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
164/531
ij
Sijkl
kl
compliance
Substituting this in the expression for total strain (equation 9-2) and usingthe expression for thermal strain (equation 9-1), we get:
ij = S ijkl kl + ij T
S ijkl kl = ij ij TWe can multiply both sides by the inverse of the compliancethat is
merely the elasticities:1
Sijkl
= E ijkl
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 4
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
165/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
166/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Stresses will arise due to the mechanical strain and these are theso-called thermal stresses.
Due to equilibrium there must be a reaction at the boundaries.
(must always have dA = Force for equilibrium)Think of this as a two-step process
Figure 9.3 Representation of stresses due to thermal expansion astwo-step process
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
167/531
p p
expands due to T, T
Reactionforce of boundaries related to mechanical strain, M
M = -T
total = 0 (no physical deformation)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 7
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Values of C.T.E.s
Note: ij = ji
Anisotropic Materials6 possibilities: 11 , 22 , 33 , 12 , 13 , 23
T can cause shear strains
not true in engineering materials
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
168/531
Orthotropic Materials3 possibilities: 11 , 22 , 33
T only causes extensional strainsNotes: 1. Generally we deal with planar structures and
are interested only in 11 and 222. If we deal with the material in other than the
principal material axes, we can have an 12
Transformation obeys same law as strain (its a tensor).
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 8
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
2-D form:
= l l
11 , 22 (in- plane values) 12 = 0 (in material axes)
3-D form:
ij = l l kl
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
169/531
j j li k
So, in describing deformation in some axis system at an angle tothe principal material axes..
Figure 9.4 Representation of 2-D axis transformation
~y2
y1~
y2
+ CCW
y1Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 9
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
11 = cos2 11 + sin
2 22 22 = sin
2 11 + cos2 22
12 = cos sin ( 22 11) only exists if 11 22
[isotropic no shear]
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
170/531
Isotropic Materials1 value: is the same in all directions
Typical Values for Materials:
Units: x 10 -6 /Fin/in/Fstrain/F
strain/F
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 10
Material C.T.E.
Uni Gr/Ep (perpendicular to fibers)
Uni Gr/Ep (along fibers)
TitaniumAluminum
Steel
16
-0.2
512.5
6
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
171/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
= (T) C.T.E. is a function of temperature (see MIL HDBK 5for metals). Can be large difference.
Implication: a zero C.T.E. structure may not truly be
attainable since it may be C.T.E. at T 1 but not at T 2 !--> Sources of temperature differential (heating)
ambient environment (engine, polar environment, earthshadow, tropics, etc.)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
172/531
aerodynamic heating radiation (black-body)
--> Constant T (with respect to spatial locations)
In many cases, we are interested in a case where T (from some referencetemperature) is constant through-the-thickness, etc. thin structures structures in ambient environment for long periods of time
Relatively easy problem to solve. Use: equations of elasticity equilibrium stress-strain
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 12
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
173/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
174/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
175/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Convection most important in aircraft:
Aerodynamic Heatinglook at adiabatic wall temperature
2TAW = 1 + 1 r M T2
where: = specific heat ratio (1.4 for air)r = "recovery factor" (0 8 0 9)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
176/531
r = "recovery factor" (0.8 - 0.9)M = Mach numberT = ambient temperature ( K)
TAW is maximum temperature obtained on surface (for zero heat flux)
Note: @40,000 ft. M = 2 TAW = 230FM = 3 TAW = 600F
(much above M = 2, cannot use aluminum
since properties are too degraded)worse in reentry
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 16
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
177/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
q = - Ts 4
surface temperatureheatflux Stefan-Boltzmann constant
emissivity(a material property)
2. Absorptivity
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
178/531
heatq = I s angle factor
flux intensity of sourceabsorptivity(a material property)
Figure 9.5 Representation of heat flux impinging on structure
angle ofstructurelike the sun
Is (intensity of source)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 18
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Heat conductionThe general equation for heat conduction is:
Tqi
T = kij
T
x jwhere:
T = temperature [K]T wattsq i = heat flux per unit area in i direction
m2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
179/531
mT wattsk ij = thermal conductivity m K
(material properties)TThe k ijare second order tensors
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 19
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
consider:Figure 9.6 Representation of structure exposed to two environments
Environment 1 Environment 2
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
180/531
look at a strip of width dz:Figure 9.7 Representation of heat flow through infinitesimal strip of
materialTq z
TTq z +
qz dz
z
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 20
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
181/531
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
182/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Bottom line : use these equations to solve for temperature distribution instructure subject to B.C.s
T (x, y, z) gives T (x, y, z)
Note : These variations can be significant
Example:Figure 9.8 Representation of plate in space
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
183/531
4q in
sun side black space side
q in
= I s - Ts4 qout = Ts
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 23
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
184/531
could get other cases where T peaks in the center, etc.Result :
Internal stresses (generally) arise if T varies spatially. (unless it isa linear variation which is unlikely given the governing equations).
Why?consider an isotropic plate with T varying only in the y-direction
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 24
MIT - 16.20Fall, 2002
Figure 9.9 Representation of isotropic plate with symmetric y-variationof T about x-axis
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
185/531
(for the time being, limit T to be symmetric withrespect to any of the axes)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 25
MIT - 16.20Fall, 2002
At first it would seem we get a deformation of a typical cross-sectionA-B as:
x
y
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
186/531
This basic shape would not vary in x.Note, however, that this deformation in the x-direction (u) varies in y.
u 0
y shear strain exists!
But , T only causes extensional strains. Thus, this deformationcannot occur.
(in some sense, we have planesections must remain plane)
Thus, the deformation must be:Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 26
MIT - 16.20Fall, 2002
locally
In order to attain this deformation, stresses must arise. Consider
two elements side by sideU d f d D f d
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
187/531
Undeformed Deformed
T
greater
These two must deform the same longitudinally, so there must bestresses present to compress the top piece and elongate the bottompiece
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 27
MIT - 16.20Fall, 2002
Thus:x = x (x)y = y (y)
This physical argument shows we have thermal strains, mechanicalstrains and stresses.
Causes
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
188/531
self-equilibrating
a a ydx = 0
b b xdy = 0
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 28
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Solution Technique
No different than any other elasticity problem. Use equations of elasticity
subject to B. C.s. exact solutions stress functions
recall:
4 = E 2 (T) (1 )2 V
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
189/531
etc.(see Timoshenko)
--> Does this change for orthotropic materials?NO (stress-strain equations change)
Weve considered Thermal Strains and Stresses , now lets
look at the other effect:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 29
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Degradation of Material Properties (due tothermal effects)
Here there are two major categories
1. Static Properties
Modulus, yield stress, ultimate stress, etc. change withtemperature (generally T property )
(see Rivello)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
190/531
temperature (generally, T property ) Fracture behavior (fracture toughness) goes through a
transition at glass transition temperatureductile brittle
Tg
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 30
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Figure 9.10 Representation of variation of ultimate stress withtemperature
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
191/531
Figure 9.11 Representation of change in stress-strain behavior withtemperature
ductile as T increases)(generally, behavior is more
--> Thus, must use properties at appropriate temperature in analysisMIL-HDBK-5 has much data
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 31
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
2. Time-Dependent Properties
There is a phenomenon (time-dependent) in materials known as creep .This becomes especially important at elevated temperature.
Figure 9.12 Representation of creep behavior
Hang a load P and
monitor strain with time
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
192/531
resulting strain-timebehavior
This keeps aluminum from being used in supersonic aircraft in criticalareas for aerodynamic heating.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 32
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Other Environmental Effects
Temperature tends to be the dominating concern, but others
may be important in both areas atomic oxygen degrades properties UV degrades properties etc.
Same effects may cause environmental strains like thermalstrains:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
193/531
Example - moistureMaterials can absorb moisture. Characterized by aswelling coefficient = ij
Same operator as ij (C. T. E.) except it operates on moistureconcentration, c:
sij = ij c
swelling moisture concentrationstrain swelling
coefficient
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 33
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
and then we have:ij = ij
M+ ij
T+ ij
S
totalThis can be generalized such that the strain due to an environmentaleffect is:
environmental
strain Eij = ij X
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
194/531
environmentalenvironmentaloperator scalar
and the total strain is the sum of the mechanical strain(s) and theenvironmental strains
A strain of this type has become important in recent work.This deals with the field of
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 34
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Piezoelectricity
A certain class of materials, known as piezoelectronics, have a coupling
between electric field and strain such that:electric field causes deformation/strainstrain results in electric field
This can be looked at conceptually the same way as environmentalstrains except electric field is a vector (not a scalar). Thus, the basicrelationship is:
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
195/531
piezoelectric
ijp
= d E kijkwhere:
Ek = electric fieldd ijk = piezoelectric constant
units = [strain/field]a key difference here is that the operator (d ijk) is a third-order tensor
(how transform? 3 direction cosines)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 35
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
And we add this strain to the others to get the total strain
(consider the case with only mechanical and piezoelectric strain)
ij=
ijM
+ ij
p
Again, only the mechanical strain is related directly to the stress:ij = S ijmn mn + d ijk Ek
inverting gives:
ij = E ijmn mn E ijmn dmnk Ek( t h th it hi f i di !)
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
196/531
(watch the switching of indices!)thus we have piezoelectric-induced stresses of:
E ijmn d mnk E kif the piezoelectric expansion is physically resisted.Again, equilibrium ( = F) must be satisfied.
But , unlike environmental cases, the electric field is not just an externalparameter from some uncoupled equation of state but there is a coupledequation:
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 36
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Di = e ik Ek + d inm mnnote switch in indices since this is transpose ofdielectric constant from previous equation
where:e ik = dielectric constantDi = electrical charge
--> Normally, when piezoelectric materials are utilized, E-field control
is assumed. That is, E k is the independent variable and the electricalcharge is allowed to float and take on whatever value results. But,
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
197/531
g ,when charge constraints are imposed the simultaneous set of equations:
mn = Emnij ij Emnij d ijk Ek
Di = e ik Ek + d inm mnmust be solved. This is coupled with any other sources of strain(mechanical, etc.)
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 37
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
Piezoelectrics useful for
sensors control of structures (particularly dynamic effects)
Note: electrical folk use a very differentnotation (e.g., S = strain)
Now that weve looked at the general causes of stress andstrain and how to manipulate, etc., consider generalstructures and stress and strain in that context
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
198/531
structures and stress and strain in that context.
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 9 - p. 38
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
199/531
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 2002
III Torsion
-
7/27/2019 Structural Mechanics - MIT 2002
200/531
III. Torsion
Paul A. Lagace 2001 Unit 10 - p. 2
MIT - 16.20 Fall, 200