Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook...
-
Upload
elijah-strickland -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook...
![Page 1: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers
Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers
(Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India)
Edward ShuryakStony Brook
(Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India)
Edward ShuryakStony Brook
![Page 2: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Experimental frontiers(not to be discussed)
Experimental frontiers(not to be discussed)
High energy: LHCWill ``perfect liquid” be still there? High luminocity at RHIC Low energy/high barion density:
RHIC/lowS,NA61 and Fair/GSI => the critical and the “softest” points
High energy: LHCWill ``perfect liquid” be still there? High luminocity at RHIC Low energy/high barion density:
RHIC/lowS,NA61 and Fair/GSI => the critical and the “softest” points
![Page 3: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Prologue: multiple views on sQGP (which forced us to learn a lot in the last few
years…)
sQGP
Plasma physics
Manybody theory
Lattice simulations
Gauge theories,SUSY modelsBlack hole
physics, String theory
AdS/CFT duality
Monopoles
Quantum mechanics
QuasiparticlesPotentialscorrelators
Bound states of EQP and MQPJ/psi,mesons,baryons,calorons
Stronly coupledcold trappedAtoms: 2nd best liquid
Moleculardynamics
Transport properties,Entropy generation
E/M duality
EoSHydrodynamics
Collective modes Energy loss,Mach cones
Flux tubes->
Bose-EinsteinCondensation->confinement RHIC
data
![Page 4: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Fundamental questions (answers?)
• What is the dynamics of confinement/deconfinement?(-) • What are the magnitude and T-dependence of electric and
magnetic couplings in sQGP? What are the masses and the role of magnetically charged quasiparticles in sQGP? (+-)
• Why is quark-gluon plasma (sQGP) at RHIC such a good liquid? (small /s, TDc ,large dp/dt) (++)
• Is it only true in the RHIC domain T=(1-2)Tc? Will we see sQGP signals at LHC as well? (--)
• AdS/CFT equilibrium results eta/s, jet quenching, conical flow, photon emission. Can one obtain a complete “gravity dual to RHIC” including equilibration/entropy?(+)
• Can we even qualitatively understand AdS/CFT results without duality? (--)
![Page 5: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
outline
• A bit of hydro
• Electric-magnetic duality (fight,competition…)
• Gauge-string duality - AdS/CFT
• Out of equilibium: sGlasma=>sQGP
• conclusions
![Page 6: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Thermo and hydrodynamics: can they be used at sub-fm scale?
• Here are three people who asked this question first:
• Fermi (1951) proposed strong interaction leading to equilibration: <n>about s1/4
• Pomeranchuck (1952) introduced freezeout• Landau (1953) explained that one should use hydro in between, saving
Fermi’s prediction via entropy conservation {he also suggested it should work because coupling runs to strong at small distance! No asymptotic freedom yet in 1950’s…}
![Page 7: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
My own hydro history
• Hydro for e+e- as a spherical explosion: PLB 34 (1971) 509
=> killed in 1973 by as.freedom and in 1976 by SLAC discovery of jets in e+e-
• Looking for it in pp: transverse flow at ISR, ES+Zhirov, PLB (1979) 253
=>Killed by apparent absence of transverse flow in pp
ES+Hung, prc57 (1998) 1891, radial flow at PbPb at CERN SPS worked (but only with correct differential freezeout surfaces!)
![Page 8: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• main RHIC finding: Strong radial and elliptic flows are very well described by ideal hydro 2001-2002: hydro describes radial and elliptic flows for all secondaries , pt<2GeV, centralities, rapidities, A (Cu,Au)… Most theorists/experimentalists were very sceptical but were eventially convinced and the term picked up by D.Teaney and myself in 2003
=> ``the most perfect liquid known” gets official=>AIP declared this to be discovery #1 of 2005 in physics
• Jets destroyed and their energy goes into hydrodynamical ``conical flow” H.Stocker 04, Casalderrey,ES,Teaney 04….
Btw, Mach cone ideas of 1970’s did not work because nucleaiAre not such perfect liquid as sQGP…
![Page 9: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
So it may be even less than Famous 1/4!
![Page 10: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
•Corrections are small for such eta/s Especially at final/later time•v2(pt) is changing at the tail and improvesAgreement at pt>1 GeV •But (my comment) relying on small tails is dangerous
![Page 11: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
D.Molnar talk here
sQGP is not aGas => BoltsmannApproach inapplicable
Yet it can be used with subdivisionsas a model
![Page 12: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
As effect of viscosity is small O(10%), thus all other uncertainties have to be included:
initial deformation shown by Raju, but one has to deal with ALL of them
• Color glass produces a bit different initial shape with sharper edge
• Include fluctuations (crucial at large b)
• Time to do UU collisions? ES,nucl-th/9906062, Bao-An Li nucl-th/9910030
Heinz, Kuhlman nucl-th/041105
![Page 13: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
4/s<1? Generalized viscosity from AdS/CFT (sound)
decreases with k/T, (although we don’t know why)
• M.Lublinsky+ES, hep-ph0704.1647 PRC ,and in progress
• 4/s(k/2T,/2 T) • Im and Re• Note reduction of Re at larger k/2T • Elliptic flow forms early, for peripheral
collisions the almond is thin enough that this effect may play a role: again larger deformed systems needed
![Page 14: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Deconfinement and Electric-magnetic
fight/competition in sQGP
.
Magnetic quasiparticles -- monopoles and dyons --are important/dominant at T< 1.5Tc
This affect thermodynamics andespecially transport due tonontrivial “magnetic bottle” effect
![Page 15: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Magnetic objects and their dynamics: classics
• ‘t Hooft and Polyakov discovered monopoles in YM gauge theories
• ‘t Hooft and Mandelstamm suggested dual superconductor mechanism for confinement
• Seiberg and Witten shown that it does work in N=2 SYM
![Page 16: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
electric/magnetic couplings (e/g)
must run in the opposite directions! Old good Dirac condition (in QED-type units e2= s)
at the e=g “equilibrium line”
s(el)= s(mag) =1(the best liquid here?)
Near deconfinement line monopoles much lighter than gluons/quarks
=>s(mag) small (Landau pole)
=> So s(el) must be strong!
n=2 (Higgs A0)
Liao,ES hep-ph/0611131
s(el)s(mag)=1s(el)
s(mag)
![Page 17: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Electric and magnetic scrreningMasses, Nakamura et al, 2004
My arrow shows the ``self-dual” E=M point
Me>MmElectrricdominated
Me<MmMagneticDominated
At T=0 magneticScreening massIs about 2 GeV(de Forcrand et al)(a glueball mass)
(Other lattice data -Karsch et al- show how MeVanishes at Tc better)
ME/T=O(g)ES 78MM/T=O(g^2)Polyakov 79
![Page 18: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
x-Correlations give MM potential (Mag.length only .1 fm!)
monopole densitystrongly grows as T=> Tc
+-
++
![Page 19: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Very recent data (thanks to M.D’Elia)
confirm that correlation strength increases with T, indeed opposite to electric
So at least the magnetic coupling does behave as Landau thought
![Page 20: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Understanding monopole dynamics
• Claudia Ratti+ES: Higgsing<L(T)> for g,q, tHooft-Polyakov monopoles +lattice data (e.g n(mon,T))
=>masses of q,g,m and s(el,T),s(mag,T)• Electric Flux Tubes in Magnetic Plasma.Jinfeng
Liao+ES arXiv:0706.4465 derives conditions for (meta) stable flux tubes at T>Tc and explains lattice data on static potentials
• Marco Cristoforetti +ES: Bose-condensation in strongly interacting liquids => Monopole mass at Tc from Feynman condition
![Page 21: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Bose-Einstein condensation of strongly
interacting particles (with M.Cristoforetti,now TU Munich)
• Feynman theory polygon jumps BEC if ∆S(jump)<Sc=1.65-1.8
• We calculated ``instantons” for particles jumping paths in a liquid and
solid He4 incuding realistic atomic potentials and confirmed it semiclassically
• Marco is doing Path Integral simulations with permutations numerically, to refine conditions when BEC transitions take place• BEC (confinement) for monopoles
• the action calculated relativistically∆S=M sqrt(d2+(1/Tc)2) = Sc=> M(mon, T= Tc)=O(300
MeV) << M(g,q)=O(800 MeV)
Jumping paths:Feynman,interacting
d
and interacting weakly
![Page 22: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
So why is such plasma a good liquid? Because of magnetic-bottle trapping:
static eDipole+MPS
+
-
MV
E+
E-
Note that Lorentz force is O(v)!
Monopole rotates around the electric field line, bouncing off both charges (whatever the sign)
![Page 23: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
We found that two charges play ping-pong by a
monopole without even
moving! Dual to Budker’s
magnetic bottle
Note that collisions are much more frequent than in cascades
![Page 24: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
MD simulation for plasma with monopoles (Liao,ES hep-ph/0611131)
monopole admixture M50=50% etcagain diffusion decreases indefinitely, viscosity does not
€
D∝1/Γ^(0.6 − 0.8)It matters: 50-50 mixture makes the best liquid, as itcreates ``maximal trapping”
![Page 25: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
AdS/CFTduality
from gravity in AdS5 to strongly coupled
CFT (N=4 SYM) plasma
(LHC people dream about a black hole formation --
But it does happen, in each and every RHIC AuAu event but in the 5th direction! What we see at RHIC is its 4d hologram…)
![Page 26: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The first gauge-string duality AdS/CFT, found in 1997!The first gauge-string duality AdS/CFT, found in 1997!
AdS/CFT correpondence or ``Maldacena AdS/CFT correpondence or ``Maldacena duality” was found on the long path duality” was found on the long path illuminated by Witten, Polyakov, illuminated by Witten, Polyakov, Polchinski, Klebanov… Polchinski, Klebanov…
(not so dangerous as Larry McLerran thinks)(not so dangerous as Larry McLerran thinks)
AdS/CFT correpondence or ``Maldacena AdS/CFT correpondence or ``Maldacena duality” was found on the long path duality” was found on the long path illuminated by Witten, Polyakov, illuminated by Witten, Polyakov, Polchinski, Klebanov… Polchinski, Klebanov…
(not so dangerous as Larry McLerran thinks)(not so dangerous as Larry McLerran thinks)
![Page 27: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
How can it help us? How can it help us?
T=0 setting and the first example of a T=0 setting and the first example of a hologramhologram
T nonzero: eta/s, Dc or dp/dt, conical T nonzero: eta/s, Dc or dp/dt, conical flow as the second hologramflow as the second hologram
sQLASMA (out of equilibrium): gravity sQLASMA (out of equilibrium): gravity dual for RHIC, dual for RHIC, t-dependent hologramt-dependent hologram of a falling string, making the entropyof a falling string, making the entropy
T=0 setting and the first example of a T=0 setting and the first example of a hologramhologram
T nonzero: eta/s, Dc or dp/dt, conical T nonzero: eta/s, Dc or dp/dt, conical flow as the second hologramflow as the second hologram
sQLASMA (out of equilibrium): gravity sQLASMA (out of equilibrium): gravity dual for RHIC, dual for RHIC, t-dependent hologramt-dependent hologram of a falling string, making the entropyof a falling string, making the entropy
![Page 28: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The duality setting
• CFT (conformal gauge theory) N=4 SYM a cousin of QCD (chromodynamics=theory of strong interaction) in which the coupling =g2Nc does not run.
• It lives on flat 4-dim boundary of 5-d curved AdS (anti-
de-Sitter) space where weakly coupled (super)gravity is a description of (super) string theory
• Strategy: calculate in the “bulk”, then project on the boundary
• Hint; think of extra dimension as a complex variable trick: instead of functions on the real axes one may think of poles in a complex plane
![Page 29: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The 5th coordinate
• the 5th coordinate z, dim=length=1/momentum • its physical meaning is a ``scale” as in renorm.group• z=>0 is ``high scale” UV or very high energies, z=>infinity is
low scale or IR• ds2 =(-dt2+dx1
2 +dx22 +dx3
2 +dz2)/z2 so distances in z are logarithmic. Light speed is still 1 in all directions
• z=L2/r where r is distance from b.h. =>Gravity force is acting toward large z, “stones” fall there• (unless they are BPS states which levitate --Newton cancels
Coulomb)• AdS/QCD with running coupling g(z): strong in some
region only (Kiritsis et al,07, also my recent proposal of 2 domain scenario ES,07)
![Page 30: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Maldacena’s dipole The Coulomb law at strong coupling
• Maldacena,Rey,Yee -98 one of the first apps:
• The string (=flux tube) is pending and has a minimal action
• Modified: at strong coupling, (g2N)1/2 << (g2N) because of short-time
color correlations ES+Zahed,04
• Can it be just a factor, like a dielectric constant?
z
![Page 31: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
A hologramm of a dipole in a stronly coupled vacuum: not just dielectric
constant and not even only electric E!• Shu Lin,ES arXiv:0707.3135 recently evaluated holographic stress tensor from the Maldacena string Here is large r behavior:
• T00 =>(g2N)1/2d3/r7
Times function of theAngle which is plotted by a solid
line(to be compared to zero coupling
=>(g2N)d2/r6
Times another function (dashed)
![Page 32: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
viscosity from AdS/CFT (Polikastro,Son, Starinets 03)
• T is given by position of a horizon (Witten 98) of non-extreme b.h.
• Kubo formula <Tij(x)Tij(y)> => graviton propagator G(x,y) Both viscosity and entropy are proportional to area of b.h. horizon
• Horizon not only has Hawking T and Bekenstein S, but many other universal properties:T.Damour (1982) => electric conductivity, shear and bulk viscosity
• K.Thorne et al (1980s) put it in the “membrane paradigm” form in which many astrophysical problems were solved
• (e.g. planets rotating around and plunging into B.H., accretion discs with magnetic and electric fields, thermal atmospheres etc)
• => “dissipation is at the bottom” since horizon membrane is black
€
/s = hbar /4π
![Page 33: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Heavy quark diffusion J.Casalderrey+ D.Teaney,hep-ph/0605199,hep-th/0701123
WORLD
ANTIWORLD
One quark (fisherman) isIn our world,The other (fish) in Antiworld (=conj.amplitude)String connects them and conduct waves in one direction through the black hole
![Page 34: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Left: P.Chesler,L.YaffeUp- from Gubser et al
Both groups made Amasingly detailedDescription of the conical flow from AdS/CFT=>very close to hydro but corrections can be inferred
subsonic
supersonic
![Page 35: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Photon spectrum has a different shape in sQGP: bremmstrahlung is strongly
suppressed while hard photons are enhanced
sQGP
wQGP
Related to talk by Iancu here
![Page 36: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
short transport summary log(inverse viscosity s/eta)- vs. log(inverse heavy q
diffusion const D*2piT) (avoids messy discussion of couplings)
• RHIC data: very small viscosity and diffusion
• vs theory - AdS/CFT and our MD
Weak coupling end =>(Perturbative results shown here)Both related to mean free path
MD results, with specifiedmonopole fraction
->Stronger coupled ->
Most perfect liquid
50-50% E/M is the most ideal liquid
4pi
![Page 37: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Non-equilibrium “gravity dual” => sGLASMA
• From cold T=0 (extreme BH= mass is minimal for its charge => no
horizon AdS ) to hot non-extreme BH with a horizon => T• extra mass from collision created falling strings:
Advantages: naturally dissipative+classical+produce correct Bekenstein entropy S
• Expanding/cooling fireball= departing b.h. horizon in different geometries: 1+d, d=1,2,3 collapses, ( Sin,ES and Zahed 04)
• Bjorken flow: BH longitudinally stratching (Janik-Peschanski 05) proposed late-time solution, Sin,Nakamura,Janik -viscosity role)
• Spherical non-dissipative explosion Big Bang=1+3 departing BH, (Sin,ES and Zahed 04, in ADS Horowitz,Itzhaki,99, Gubser et al, 06)
• non-dissipative explosion in 1+1 dim: (Kajantie et al 07)
![Page 38: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Gravity dual to the (e+e-=>heavy quarks) collision: “Lund model” in AdS/CFT (Shu Lin,ES, I+II papers )
If colliding objects are made of heavy quarks
• Stretching strings are falling under the AdS gravity and don’t break
• Instability of simple scaling solution and numerical studies
• Analogs of longitudinal E,B in wGLASMA
AdS5 center=
Extremal b.h.
![Page 39: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
• a ``holographic image” of this process,
• <= time-dependent Green function for linearized Einstein eqns
How does it look for a falling string?
Is it hydro-like explosion or not?
![Page 40: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
• Holographic image of a falling string
shows an explosion
• (as far as we know the first time-dependent hologramm)
• Which however cannot be reprensented as hydro fluid! => anisotropic pressure in the ``comoving frame”
• (like in Raju’s wGLASMA)
T00 , Toi
![Page 41: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The story of two membranes:(Many strings falling together)• Imagine 2 walls of heavy quarks =>
multiple strings falling (e.g.no dependence on transverse coordinates x2,x3)
• The falling object is thus not a string but 3d membrane (or fabric) to be called Mm (for matter)
• => another (more famous) membrane Mh, (of the “membrane paradigm”) is hovering just above the horizon
![Page 42: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The story of two membranes II (textbook example)
• A thin spherical shell of massless “photons” falls radially and horizon is created
• This is in global coordinates: distant observer (we need for AdS/CFT holography) does not see the b.h. interior
Curvatureat membrane jumps =>Israel junctioncondition
![Page 43: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The story of two
membranes III (textbook example)
• the stretching and falling “matter membrane” Mm, its ends have +/- v
• horizon membrane Mh bulges upward due to gravity of Mm till they merge
• Fragmentation regions remain non-thermal but in the middle Mm gets substituted by Mh,
• observer at midrapidity
sees hydrodynamical hologram, but not in fragmentation regions
Before equilibration
![Page 44: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The horizon membrane can change shape easily provided its area (=entropy)
is preserved as soap film
• Mh is 3-dimensional in 5d, if stretched longitudinally a la Hubble x=vt, it moves in z=O(t1/3)=1/r so A=4S= O(x r3)=const (Janik et al)
• In the next to leading order (in powers of inverse time) there is dissipation induced by the Mh viscosity
![Page 45: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Questions to think about
• Is this “two membrane paradigm” a AdS/CFT analog to top-down + down-up cascades?
(collisional and bremmstrahlung equilibration) • Are instabilities/excitation of falling
strings analogs of plasma instabilities (filamentation)? Unruh T?
• How exactly flling strings get exactly the Bekenstein entropy?
![Page 46: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Conclusions• Strongly coupled
QGP produced at RHIC is at T=(1-2)Tc =>
• This is the region where electric/magnetic couplings cross
• AdS/CFT => natural applications to sQGP. In equilibrium almost done (but not understood)
• RHIC data on transport (eta/s,D),
ADS/CFT and electric/magnetic QGP qualitatively agree!
• Are these two pictures related?
• LHC will tellThis makes This makes so “perfect so “perfect liquid” liquid” because of the because of the magnetic-magnetic-bottle trappingbottle trapping the lowest the lowest viscosity for viscosity for 50-50% 50-50% electric/magnetielectric/magnetic plasmac plasma
Non-equilibrium time-dependentAdS/CFT = sGLASMA•Two-membranes paradigm =>horizon provides T•Equilibration/entropy production in sQGP can benefit from 30 years or work on gravitational collapse+30 years of string theory
![Page 47: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Thank you, Indian friends!
Good by,
Quark Matter 2008,
Jaipur India
![Page 48: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
reserve
![Page 49: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Sonic boom from quenched jets Casalderrey,ES,Teaney, hep-ph/0410067; H.Stocker…
• the energy deposited by jets into liquid-like strongly coupled QGP must go into conical shock waves
• We solved relativistic hydrodynamics and got the flow picture
• If there are start and end points, there are two spheres and a cone tangent to both
Wake effect or “sonic boom”
![Page 50: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Effective coupling is large! alphas=O(1/2-1) (not <0.3 as in pQCD applications)
tHooft lambda=g2Nc=4piNc=O(20)>>1-1
Bielefeld-BNL lattice group: Karsch et al
![Page 51: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Strong coupling in plasma physics: Gamma= <|Epot|>/<Ekin> >>1
gas => liquid => solid• This is of course for
+/- Abelian charges,• But ``green” and
``anti-green” quarks do the same!
•local order would be preserved in a liquid also,
as it is in molten solts (strongly coupled TCP with <pot>/<kin>=O(60), about 3-10 in sQGP)
![Page 52: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
• RHIC findings: collective flows and jet quenching • Fundamental questions:
Why is quark-gluon plasma (sQGP) at RHIC such a good liquid? Is it related to deconfinement? What is the role of e/m duality and magnetic objects in sQGP? Do AdS/CFT or e/m dualities explain RHIC results?
Viscosity and diffusion constant from AdS/CFT, New meaning of dissipation Electric and magnetic quasiparticles (EQPs and MQPs) are fighting for
dominance (J.F.Liao,ES, hep-ph/0611131,PRC 07)
The trapping via magnetic bottle effect molecular dynamics (MD) of Non-Abelian plasma with
monopoles(B.Gelman, I.Zahed,ES, PRC74,044908,044909 (2006), J.F.Liao,ES, hep-ph/0611131,PRC 07):
transport summary; both dualities -AdS/CFT and sQGP with monopoles - seem to work.
Summary:Are they related??? LHC will tell
![Page 53: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
main RHIC finding
• Strong radial and elliptic flows are very well described by ideal hydro => ``the most perfect liquid known”
• Strong jet quenching, well beyond pQCD gluon radiation rate, same for heavy charm quarks (b coming)
• Jets destroyed and their energy goes into hydrodynamical ``conical flow”
![Page 54: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
2001-2005: hydro describes radial and elliptic flows for all secondaries , pt<2GeV, centralities, rapidities, A (Cu,Au)…
Experimentalists were very sceptical but wereconvinced and ``near-perfect liquid” is now official,
=>AIP declared this to be discovery #1 of 2005 in physics v_2=<cos(2 phi)>
PHENIX,
Nucl-ex/0410003
red lines are for ES+Lauret+Teaney done before RHIC data, never changed or fitted, describes SPS data as well! It does so because of the correct hadronic matter /freezout via (RQMD)
proton pion(``strong coupling” ideas before RHIC)
![Page 55: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
PHENIX jet pair distribution
Note: it is only projection of a cone on phi
Note 2: there is also a minimum in
<p_t(\phi)> at
180 degr., with
a value
Consistent with
background
The most peripheral bin, here there is no QGP
![Page 56: Strongly coupled QGP: New Frontiers (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony Brook (Quark Matter 2008, Jaipur India) Edward Shuryak Stony.](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032606/56649eaa5503460f94baecc9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
An example of ``dyonic baryon”=finite T instanton
top.charge Q=1 config.,dyons identified via fermionic zero modes
Berlin group - Ilgenfritz et al
Red, blue and green U(1) fields
3 dyons with corresp.Field strengths, SU(3),Each (1,-1,0) charges