Strategy table decision quality
Click here to load reader
-
Upload
yoni-dayan -
Category
Business
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Strategy table decision quality
Strategy Themes
Market research study
Manufacturing process
How to enter overseas market,
if at all
Capacity to be built into
production plant
Dealing with price volatility of input
© 2013 by Strategic Decisions Group. All rights reserved. DQ 101 www.sdg.com
Fixed-price contracts
Maintain high inventory
Revise product price
periodically
Do nothing Don’t do study
Focus on current market
Study current market + overseas partner’s market
Study global market
Use existing
manufacturing process
Design & build next
generation mfg process/
capability
Outsource mfg
Minimal development
strategy
Meet current market share
and new overseas market
Meet current market
share
Meet potential global
market share
Enter with local partner
Do not enter
Direct investment to
enter
Pilot/test market entry
Sell through established distributors
Re-engineer and replace
volatile input
Improve existing process
High development
strategy
Strategy 1: Minimal development
Minimal risks/conservative development for the Delta division responsible for the new product
Advantages:
- Low capital risks in short term for Delta division that is responsible for the new product
- Maximizes investment capital today for Gamma division (the “new” division responsible for untapped markets that is developing three new products)
- Greater protection for surviving a bad year
- Low investments (in R&D, tech, recruiting, etc)
- Focus on what we know/do best with Delta
- Control quality of the Delta product/services we are producing/manufacturing
Disadvantages:
- Low investment on Delta could be high-risk in the long-term, company could lose its core Delta market share before investment in Gamma pays off
- Opens markets for Delta competitors to establish strength/ownership
- Less “future-proof” if Gamma requires greater investments
- Low Return On Investment
Strategy 2: High development
Ambitious and high development of the Delta division responsible for the new product
Advantages:
- Focus investment on known products (as Delta is the “traditional” division of ZyrTex) in markets to be confirmed by research
- Potentially greatly increased market share, income and cashflow once the ROI/break even points are reached, due to increased pool of customers and next-gen fabrication process
- Potentially generates greater future investment capital for Gamma division, if Delta pays off
- More global recognition of the brand, overall stronger value proposition, making ZyrTex a stronger competitor
Disadvantages:
- High investment in next gen manufacturing and entry in new market implies high risks
1) Greater exposure to losses
2) Potential of borrowing from future cash flow
3) Less capital for Gamma at first and potentially in the long term if results from Delta expansion are lackluster
- Could disrupt the core activity, if global entry falters or new fab process fails in current market