Strategy for Stakeholder involvement Focus on Science Policy Interface_Katharina Helming

1

Livestock meeting Bilbao 10/14

Katharina Helming, Aranka Podhora, Hannes König

Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)

Germany

Strategy for Stakeholder involvement

Why? When? Who? How?

focus on science-policy Interface

2 Bilbao, MACSUR LiveM, 15 October 2014

Research for sustainable development

Future Oriented

„What are the emergent

challenges?“

Relevant

„knowledge needs of

decision makers?“

Integrated

„Which disciplines and

acteurs, which scales?“

Credible

„Which methods and

how validated?“

Key characteristis

Why?


Assessment and decision making steps

P what could be the action?

I what would be the impact?

R What response is required?

DPSIR

D what is the problem?

S what are the state changes?

Stakeholders

Problem

analysis

Option

development

Impact

Valuation

Solution

Development

when?


Decision making and assessment steps




DPSIR



Stakeholders

When?

Problem

analysis

Option

development

Impact

Valuation

Solution

Development

who?

Decision makers

Micro-level

Decision

takers

Decision makers

macro level

Stakeholders

Who?






DPSIR



Stakeholders

Problem

analysis

Option

development

Impact

Valuation

Solution

Development

How?

Researchers

Foresight

Scenario

development

Impact

modelling

Governance

models

Change

modelling


who?

Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H. and Stringer L.C. (2009) Who's in and why? A

typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5), 1933-1949.

Pretty, Jules (1995): Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture. World Development Vol. 23 No. 8: 1247-1263.

Framework for stakeholder engagement

the MACSUR case

why? how?

Decision maker

Decision taker

Information reception

(passiv)

Information provision

(active)

Information exchange

(interactive)

quantitative

qualitative

Reed et al.(2009) Pretty et al.(2009)


Hannes J. König*, Katharina Helming, Stefan Sieber, Sandra Uthes (ZALF)

Germany

This Phuoc Lai Nguyen, Giovanna Seddaiu, Pier Paolo Roggero (UNI Sassari)

Italy

Agnes van den Pol (WUR) Netherlands

Gianni Quaranta, Rosanna Medes (UNIBAS) Italy

Tommy Dalgaard, Chris Kjeldsen, Katrine Grace Turner and Morten

Graversgaard (Aarhus University) Denmark

Richard Kipling (Aberystwyth University) UK

Martin Köchy (TI) Germany


the MACSUR case

Who is involved?



the MACSUR case

FoPIA –

Partici-

patory

assessment

Social

learning

process

MultiSward

questionnaire

ManPrAs Policy

impact

assessment

Fuzzy

Cognitive

Mapping

Participatory

Ecosystem

Service

Mapping

PSV

workshop

method

SOLID

procedure

SCALA tool

WHO?

(Reed et al.)

Decision maker + + + + +

Decision taker + + + + + + +

Scientist

+ + + + +

WHY?

(Pretty et al.)

Information

sharing

(passive)

Provisioning of

information

(active) + + + + + + +

Interactive

participation + + + + + + +

HOW?

Quantitative + + + +

Qualitative + + + + + +


The policy level (Europe)

Stakeholder Involvement


Europe 2020 - Policy

Grand Societal Challenges

Health, demographic change and well being

Food security, sustainable agriculture, and the

bioeconomy Secure, clean and efficient energy

Smart, green and integrated transport

Climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials

Inclusive, innovative and secure societies


Trade regulations, carbon agreements

Common Agricultural Policy

Water Framework Directive

Natura 2000 Directive

Biodiversity Strategy

Spatial Planning Regulations

Regional infrastructure decisions

Farm management

Consumer Choices

Certificates

Decision making levels

International

European

National

Regional

Local

Agreements, Policies, Business, Civil Society, Consumer

Why?


Policy cycle

Preparatory

policy

development

Ex-ante

policy

IA

monitoring

policy

implementation

policy

reform

Preparatory

policy

evaluatoin

ex-post

Impact

assessment


Integrated Policy Impact Assessment (IA)

2.Define objectives

3.Develop policy options

4.Analyse impact of options

5.Compare the options

6.Prepare monitoring and

evaluation

6 steps of IA

1.Identify the problem Foresight

Scenario Analysis

Models

Indicators, integrated assessment

Scientific support

35 Impact Areas:

11 economic (trade, admin, competitive..

11 social (health, education…

13 environmental (biodiv, climate, soil …


Transparency of Impact Assessment


Needs in MACSUR

• Analyse policy makers needs – get involved in the

question framing

• Analyse policy questions with integrated methods

• Assess the impacts of policy options on economic,

environmental, social aspects: impact of

agricultural changes • on competitiveness of the farming sector

• on food provision, on rural development

• on environment (soil, biodiv, water utilisation..)

• on carbon sequestration an climate change mitigation

• Make our models available to policy makers


Lessons from LIAISE project

LIAISE

Linking Impact Assessment Intruments with

Sustainability Expertise

FP7NoE


LIAISE KIT – toolbox for indicators


Research for sustainable development

Future Oriented

„What are the emergent

challenges?“

Relevant

„knowledge needs of

decision makers?“

Integrated

„Which disciplines and

acteurs, which scales?“

Credible

„Which methods and

how validated?“

Thank you for your attention!

Strategy for Stakeholder involvement Focus on Science Policy Interface_Katharina Helming

Environment

Transcript of Strategy for Stakeholder involvement Focus on Science Policy Interface_Katharina Helming