Absolute-Return-Strategien für jedes Marktumfeld Global Activist Funds.
Strategien für das Maßschneidern von Faserverbundstrukturen in der...
Transcript of Strategien für das Maßschneidern von Faserverbundstrukturen in der...
Strategien für das Maßschneidern von Faserverbundstrukturen in der Luft- und Raumfahrt
Strategies for the design of CFRP structures in aerospace and space applications
Prof. Richard Degenhardt2,3, Prof. Axel Hermann1,Dr. Andreas Baar1
1CFK-Valley, Stade2DLR, Institut für Faserverbundleichtbau und Adaptronik 3Private Fachhochschule Göttingen (Standort Stade)
2
1. Introduction
2. Example 1 (Space):
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
3. Example 2 (Aerospace):
Exploitation of reserve capacities in the postbuckling area of CFRP fuselage panels
4. Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen
5. CFK-Valley Stade
Overview
3
Examples for future structures made of CFRP
Transport / Energy
Space
Ariane 5 Int. space station ISS
Aerospace
4
Year
CFR
P
787 = 50%
A380 = 22%
Source: NASA, Airbus und Boeing
Composite structures in aerospace
A350 > 50%
5
1. Introduction
2. Example 1 (Space):
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
3. Example 2 (Aerospace):
Exploitation of reserve capacities in the postbuckling area of CFRP fuselage panels
4. Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen
5. CFK-Valley Stade
Overview
Ariane 5 Int. space station ISS
6
Task: Maximal buckling load for 2 double layers
R = 250 mm
L = 510 mm
t1 = t2 = 0,25 mm
Fmax = 31,39 kN
Fmin = 17,59 kN
Optimisation of an unstiffened CFRP cylinderunder axial loading
7
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
Guideline NASA-SP 8007 based on empirical methodsvery conservative knock-down factorsNo guidelines for composite structures
State of art
8
Radial perturbation load
Position and magnitude are variableSeveral tests with different imperfections
Test procedure:1. radial perturbation load2. axial compression
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2 4 6 8 10
Perturbation load P (N)
Buc
klin
g lo
ad N
(kN
)
0
10
20
0 0,1 0,2 0,3
Displacement (mm)
Load
(kN
)
Test results for cylinder Z07 and one perturbation position
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2 4 6 8 10Perturbation load P (N)
Buc
klin
g lo
ad N
(kN
)
0
10
20
0 0,1 0,2 0,3
Displacement (mm)
Load
(kN
)
Test results for cylinder Z07 and one perturbation position
Each dot marks one testUnexpected horizontal curve progression
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
11
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 2 4 6 8 10Perturbation load P (N)
Buc
klin
g lo
ad N
(kN
)
P1
N1
N0line (a)
line (b)
line (c)
Test results for cylinder Z07 and one perturbation position
New approach:Idealization of curve progression by three linesLower boundary limit of buckling load for imperfect shells:„Load carrying capability N1“
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
12
Evaluation of the Knock-Down Factor
500
Classical Buckling Load
Measured Buckling Loads
ρ
0.32
0.650.5% Quantile
NASA
Project cylinder propertiesTotal length = 540 mmFree length = 500 mmRadius = 250 mmPly orientation = +24,-24,+41,-41Thickness = 0.5 mm
MCS Simulations
Buckling Load with Single Perturbation Load
13
Summary / Conclusions
The NASA SP 8007 guideline is very conservative if composite structures shall be designed.The Single-Pertubation load approach is a promissing alternative.The knowledge of the minimum pertubation is needed.A new empirical formula for the critical pertubation load P1, which is a good assumption for the minimum pertubation load, was developed. This formula was in a first step developed for metallic structures.In future work it will be extended for composite materials.
5.10 ≤< t
14
1. Introduction
2. Example 1 (Space):
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
3. Example 2 (Aerospace):
Exploitation of reserve capacities in the postbuckling area of CFRP fuselage panels
4. Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen
5. CFK-Valley Stade
Overview
15
Next generation –All composite fuselage structure
The current research considers curvedCFRP panels which are understood as parts of a fuselage section.
Structures considered
16
Scale factor: 10
Scale factor: 8
Scale factor: 5
Scale factor: 3
1st global (stringer-based) buckling
1st local buckling
Scale factor: 5
Shortening
Load
Real curve
Collapse load
Simplified curve
What is collapse(Example: Axially compressed curved stiffened CFRP panel)
17
FBL
Collapse
OD
I
II
III
Shortening
Load
UL
LL
Future Design Scenario
Design Scenarios for Stiffened Panels
Ultimate Load (UL)
First Buckling Load (FBL)Limit Load (LL)
Collapse
Onset ofDegradation (OD)
I
II
III
Allowed underoperating flightconditions
Safety Region
Not allowed
Shortening
Load
Current Design Scenario
18
WP 1 Benchmarking - Example
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4Shortening [mm]
Load
[kN]
Experiment P12Abaqus, Nominal, No ImperfectionsSOL 106, Compdat, No ImperfectionsSOL 106, Compdat, With ImperfectionsSOL 600, Compdat, No ImperfectionsLS-Dyna, Compdat, No Imperfections
Not correct because 1) Degradation is not considered2) Sensitive for modelling of the lateral boundary conditions
Collapse
19
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
Shortening [mm]
Load
[kN
]
Cycle 0001Cycle 0401Cycle 0801Cycle 1201Cycle 1601Cycle 2001Cycle 2401Cycle 2601Cycle 2801Cycle 3001Cycle 3201Cycle 3401Cycle 3601Cycle 3801 Collapse
WP 4 - Test Panel P29 – Load shortening curve with Thermography
20
Analysis
Fast toolsTools with analytical and semi-
analytical approach
For design process For certification
Slow toolsCommercial FE tools (e.g.
SAMCEF, NASTRAN, ABAQUS ,etc.)
Simulation Tools
21
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0Shortening [mm]
Load
[kN
]
ABAQUS - No degradation
ABAQUS - With skin-stringer separation
Test results
Comparison Simulation - Test
22
1. Introduction
2. Example 1 (Space):
Future design concept for unstiffened CFRP structures
3. Example 2 (Aerospace):
Exploitation of reserve capacities in the postbuckling area of CFRP fuselage panels
4. Private University of Applied Sciences Göttingen
5. CFK-Valley Stade
Overview