STRATEGIC RENEWAL (Organisational learning)
description
Transcript of STRATEGIC RENEWAL (Organisational learning)
1
STRATEGIC RENEWAL STRATEGIC RENEWAL (Organisational learning)(Organisational learning)
CC
BBAA
Strategic Strategic Inflection PointInflection Point
PER
FO
RM
AN
PER
FO
RM
AN
CE
CE
YEARSYEARS20012001 20072007 20152015
2
NRF NRF LLINKAGE INKAGE TTO O DSTDST 1010--YYEAR EAR IINNOVATION NNOVATION PPLANLAN
NRFNRF
3
NRFNRF VVISION ISION & & CCOMPOSITIONOMPOSITION
SCIENCE
MISSIONS
MuseumMuseum ZooZoo Observatory
SCIENCE AWARENESS PLATFORM
EDUCATION
SCIENCE
COMMUNICATION
School science support
Science materialsScience materialsCommunication of research to
public audiences
Science and the media
SET Careers
KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
SSCIENCE CIENCE AADVANCEMENTDVANCEMENT
5
THE PTHE PHHD PIPELINE in SAD PIPELINE in SA
PHD’s ~ 1 200/yr
HG Maths and Science ~ 26 000/yr
Senior certificate with endorsement~ 86 500/yr
Existing National graduation pipeline (2005)
Existing National SETpipeline (2005)
Total all undergraduate rates ~ 49 753/yr
Hons ~ 23 000/yr
Masters ~ 8 000/yr
Total SET undergraduate rates ~15 991/yr
Hons ~ 3 200/yr
Masters ~ 2 900/yr(incl. coursework)
PHD’s ~ 561/yr
Average conversion efficiency Average conversion efficiency (BSc – Hons; Hons – Masters; (BSc – Hons; Hons – Masters;
Master – PHD)Master – PHD)43% to 57% ~ 3000 SET PHD’s 43% to 57% ~ 3000 SET PHD’s
/year/year
6
PPHHD ED ENROLMENTNROLMENT vs. G vs. GRADUATIONRADUATION
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Enrolments Graduates
7
PhD production
149
315
259
115
436
173
40
389
355
108
186 181196
155
46
187
116
155
307272
174
27
240
146172
171
120
22
174
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Pol
and
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Ger
man
y
Mex
ico
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Fran
ce
Japa
n
Spa
in
Kor
ea (R
epub
lic o
f)
Can
ada
Italy
Aus
tralia
Sw
itzer
land
Sw
eden
Net
herla
nds
Turk
ey
Por
tuga
l
Aus
tria
Finl
and
Hun
gary
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Nor
way
Irela
nd
New
Zea
land
Icel
and
Slo
vak
Rep
ublic
Gre
ece
Den
mar
k
Bel
gium
Chi
na
Indi
a
Taiw
an
Sou
th A
frica
Bra
zil
PhD
's (/
mill
ion
of p
opul
atio
n / y
ear)
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
PPHHD PD PRODUCTIONRODUCTION RRATESATES FOR FOR SSELECTEDELECTED CCOUNTRIESOUNTRIES
A-league(Germany, UK, Switzerland, Sweden, Portugal, Austria,
Finland)
B-league(US, Japan, Spain, South Korea, Australia, Netherlands, Norway
etc.)
C-league(Mexico, Turkey, Iceland, China,
India, Brazil, South Africa)
AANNUALNNUAL P PHHD FD FAIRAIR EENDND M MAYAY- -
FFLAGSHIP OF LAGSHIP OF PPHHDD PPROJECTROJECT
AANNUALNNUAL P PHHD FD FAIRAIR EENDND M MAYAY- -
FFLAGSHIP OF LAGSHIP OF PPHHDD PPROJECTROJECT
INVITEDSTUDENTS
OVERSEAS PARTNERS
PPHHD FAIRD FAIR
SPEAKERS
Service
Tables/Stalls-SA HEIs-International HEIs-Science Councils
HIGHER ED.RECRUITERS
-Employed-Current students-Interns-General Public
SPONSORS
-Government-Government-Corporate-Corporate-NGOs-NGOs
- Motivational Keynote- Government- Research DVCs/Deans - Successful PHD Grads - Concurrent Subject Panels
-EOC IIE SAEPEOC IIE SAEP-USAID/NSF-USAID/NSF(US)-European Partners
•Most successful program Most successful program in the 80s & 90s.in the 80s & 90s.
•Produced over 1,600 Produced over 1,600 graduates from US HEIsgraduates from US HEIs
•Return rate › 95%Return rate › 95%
•Senior Positions in NSISenior Positions in NSI
9
8000 33
000
5500
0
7000
0
4500
0 8000
0 1200
00
4000
0 7000
0
1200
00
1800
00
1500
0
020,00040,00060,00080,000
100,000120,000140,000160,000180,000200,000
Ra
nd
s Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
PPOST OST GGRAD RAD FFUNDING UNDING SSCENARIOSCENARIOS
10
DDISCIPLINESISCIPLINES vs. Gvs. GRANDRAND CCHALLENGESHALLENGES
Econ/M
gt Sc
Econ/M
gt Sc
i i
Life Sc
Life Sc
ii
E
ngin/Tech
Engin/Tech
Nat.S
ci/Math
Nat.S
ci/Math
Hum
an/Law
Hum
an/Law
S
oc. Sci
Soc. S
ci
CH
ALLEN
GES
/C
HA
LLEN
GES
/TH
EM
ES
TH
EM
ES
Other
Energy Security
Space Science
Human/SocialDynamics
Global Change
Material & Nanotech
Bio-Economy
DISCIPLINESDISCIPLINES
11
R & D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
20
15
10
5
0
10
20
30
40
COMMERCIALISATION
VC SweetSpot
ICT
New Materials(steel)
TIME
INV
ES
TM
EN
TR
ETU
RN
S
Biotech
IF SWEET POT
IINNOVATIONNNOVATION F FUND:UND: HHIGHIGH R RISKISK I INVESTMENTSNVESTMENTS
12
R&D INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SINCE 1999R&D INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SINCE 1999
13
KKEY EY CCHALLENGES: HALLENGES: 2008-2009 (CONT)2008-2009 (CONT)
• In real terms, declining MTEF core allocation (e.g. RISA core grant – 97.4% of MTEF committed to grant making)
NRF FUNDING TREND
450 523 559
117156 170
639
864
1,229
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2007 2008 2009
Year
R' m
illi
on
Contract &Other
Ringfencedgrant from DST
Core grant fromDST