Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
-
Upload
damon-hood -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate
Andrew PritchardDirector of Policy & Infrastructure
Introduction
● Why is strategic planning important?● A new approach to strategic planning ● The duty to co-operate● Conclusions● Final thoughts
Why is strategic planning important?
● development is often driven by ‘larger than local’ pressures – and can have impacts that extend beyond council boundaries
● a clear strategic planning context is essential to securing major infrastructure investment
● to be found sound, local plans must address relevant strategic planning issues properly
A new approach to strategic planning
● Despite the proposed abolition of RSSs, the Government is committed to strategic, cross boundary planning - on issues that need to be effectively addressed at a larger then local scale
● But it’s strategic planning in the context of localism
● Rather than setting rules and structures Government will remove barriers and provide a range of tools to address strategic planning issues
Duty to Co-operate – the new tool
● Requires councils and public bodies to engage constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis in relation to planning of sustainable development
● Requires councils to consider whether to enter into agreements on joint approaches or prepare joint local plans (if an LPA)
● Applies to planning for strategic matters in relation to the preparation of local and Marine Plans, and other activities that prepare the way for these activities
Duty to Cooperate: strategic matters (NPPF)
● Provision of homes and jobs● Retail, leisure and commercial development● Infrastructure for transport, telecoms, waste,
water, flood-risk, coastal change, minerals & energy
● Health, security, community & cultural infrastructure
● Climate change mitigation and adaptation● Conservation & enhancement of the natural &
historic environment, including landscape
Duty to Co-operate: other public bodies
● Environment Agency ● English Heritage ● Natural England ● Mayor of London ● Civil Aviation
Authority ● HCA ● Primary Care Trusts
● Office of the Rail Regulator
● Highways Agency ● Transport for London ● Integrated Transport
Authorities ● Highway Authorities ● Marine Management
Organisation
Duty to Co-operate: LEPs & LNPs
● As LEPs are not defined by statute, they are not covered by the Duty.
● However, LEPs have been identified in the regulations as bodies that those covered by duty ‘should have regard to’ when preparing local plans and other related activities
● The Government has indicated that Local Nature Partnerships (LNPs) will be treated in the same way when established
Duty to Co-operate: key outcomes
● Duty to Cooperate is intended to promote a culture change and spirit of partnership working on strategic cross boundary issues e.g. environment, economy and infrastructure
● Working alongside incentives, such as the New Homes Bonus, the Duty will act as a strong driver to change the behaviour of local authorities
● More co-operation will increase the effectiveness of plans and help to reduce the costs of plan preparation
Duty to Co-operate: sanctions?
● The duty to co-operate is a legal requirement of the plan preparation process
● Non-compliance cannot be fixed at Examination by PINS – the plan cannot be adopted
● Policies developed through the duty must also be found sound (i.e. evidence based and deliverable)
● Where a plan is absent, silent or out of date, the presumption in favour of sustainable development will apply
Duty to Co-operate: what is needed?
● an understanding of the key strategic issues facing your area (in the absence of the RSS)
● a willingness to work with the right partners to address strategic issues constructively
● political ownership of partnership working arrangements and joint policy outcomes - even if it means making some decisions for the ‘greater good’ that are unpopular locally
The ‘sharing trade-off’
• Increased access to funding?
• Clear and deliverable investment framework?
• Adopted local plan?• Risk management e.g.
flooding, water supply?
SS Strategic Planning
Rising to the Challenge
• Demonstrating leadership
• Locally driven ‘strategic’ priorities
• Corporate ownershipHMS Cooperation
• Continuity & consistency
• Honesty & transparency
• Keeping it real & deliverable
Get your house in order!
4. Establish ‘fit for purpose’ governance & support arrangements
3. Review existing partnerships & working groups
2. Ensure corporate roles & responsibilities are clear & understood
1. Identify ‘strategic’ issues to be addressed
‘Making Strategic Planning Happen’(available at: www.pas.gov.uk)
Level 1: Simple Guide Q &A
Level 2: What are the key strategic issues?
Level 3: What are the mechanisms?
Level 4: 10 Golden Rules of Strategic Planning
Level 5: Case Studies
Conclusions
● Co-operation is not an end in itself - the objective should be local plans that are sustainable and deliverable and result in better places
● The scale and type of co-operation required should flow from the evidence – but will also depend on relationships
● The effectiveness of the duty will depend on the willingness of elected members to ‘pool sovereignty’ on difficult decisions
Final Thoughts
● Councils have lobbied hard for the removal of regional plans and targets
● Failure to make the Duty to Co-operate work will undermine confidence on local government – and the planning system as whole