Turning strategic relationships into successful partnerships
Strategic Planning for Successful International Expansion
-
Upload
walter-adamson -
Category
Business
-
view
18.290 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Strategic Planning for Successful International Expansion
Strategic Planning for Successful International
Expansion
Lessons learnt from Asian failed experiences
By Walter AdamsonFounder & PrincipalDigital Investor
Melbourne, Australia
October, 2005
Slide 2©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
The Challenge
Many small companies in the mobile and content space have struggled to expand:
Their overseas acquisitions fail to deliver Expansion proves more difficult Money and management effort is wasted
Typically many Japanese and Australia companies have these problems, often because of unsophisticated management approaches.
Slide 3©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
The Top Six Sins
The most common faults, with the greatest opportunity for success when corrected are:
1. Unclear Strategic Intent
2. Underestimated risk
3. Lack of linkage between strategy and actions
4. Poor balance between “tight” and “loose”
5. Poor project reviews of Key Result Areas
6. Poor alignment between strategy and structure
Slide 4©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
Business Characteristics
Characteristic Global Exporter Multinational Multi-local Global
Products & Services Homogeneous Homogeneous- some
customisedCustomised – some
homogeneous
Flexible architecture allowing for mass
customisation
Value Chain Activities
Highly concentrated in one country
Distributed but highly controlled by home
country
Highly duplicated in each country
Highly networked and distributed around
the globe
Basis of Competition
Economies of scale in production
Sharing innovations outbound from HQ Local responsiveness
EOS of production and knowledge, and low cost/customer
driven
Organization Home country nationals
HQ controls national companies
Strong national organisations, HQ
plays primarily financial role
Decisions made at centres of
competence
Customers All customers get the same treatment
Local customers supported by national
sales, global customers with
difficulty
Local customer focus, global
customers only with great difficulty
Supports global and local customers
Slide 5©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
Global Assessment
Attributes Never --Scale-- Always Description
Thinking Global ● Managers thinking of the world as one environment
Commitment to global vision ● All employees aware of global
vision and acting
Building global initiatives ● Multidisciplinary teams active in global programs
Appealing to customers worldwide ● Customised offers and cultural fit
Building globally scalable resources
Deliberately sharing knowledge and synergies
Managing the connections Managers managing in local cultures sensitively
Developing global leaders and teams
Global values, compensation tied to behaviours
Leveraging IT to build global capacity Effective common systems
Capture global benefits Investment returns support local/global balance
Slide 6©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
1. Unclear Strategic Intent
A lack of clarity in the Strategic Intent:
leads to poor strategic decisions,
and most importantly leads to
the wrong allocation of resources,
wrong allocation of management attention.
1
Slide 7©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
1. Unclear Strategic Intent
The ABCD Planning process:
A is the AS IS – today B is the STRATEGIC INTENT C are CONTRAINTS and CRITERIA, D is the DESIGN of Pilots (prototypes of the new business model – used to test the feasibility of the Plan).
1
Slide 8©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
1. Unclear Strategic Intent
A clear Strategic Intent:
Drives the Mission and its Objectives, Strategies and Actions
Which in turn require judgments about what is Loose and what is Tight, and the Tight are reported through the Scorecard.
1
Slide 9©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
2. Underestimated Risk
An overestimation of the current competencies, born of success in the home market, leads to an underestimation of the
risk and effort needed to cross the chasm to the new Strategic Intent.
1 2
Slide 10©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
2. Underestimated Risk
Steps A and B are the hardest parts:
A – Must confront the genuine status and capabilities and strengths and weaknesses today – this is often threatening B – Must develop the Strategic Intent, which requires clarity of vision and purpose, and is challenging and requires effort
1 2
Slide 11©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
3. Lack of Linkage
A lack of linkage between Strategies and Actions leads to uncertain results.
That is, the strategic plan often does not tell a story – it doesn’t speak to the
Mission and the Strategic Intent.
1 2 3
Slide 12©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
3. Lack of Linkage
The relationship and transition from Vision, Mission, Objectives, Strategies and Actions needs to be clear and explicit. Vision is the “light on the hill” Mission is what you stand for in relation to your stakeholders Objectives are where you are heading Strategies are what you’ll do to get there Actions are how you’ll deliver
1 2 3
Slide 13©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
4. Poor Balance
Commonly, there is a poor balance, or no explicit balance, between loose and tight – between autonomy and mission-critical tight –resulting in: management anarchy in the culture and execution
and a lack of alignment with the corporate centre.
When this happens it is very hard to deliver the corporate value proposition.
1 2 3 4
Slide 14©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
4. Poor Balance
Once the decision about balance is made then the key to effective management is the scorecard:
If it is not on the scorecard then it is not “tight”, since the scorecard is the tool for visibility into all the selected tight variables.
Financial Operational
PeopleKey Result
Areas
1 2 3 4
Slide 15©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
5. Poor Project Reviews
Key Projects, that is those projects related to Key Result Areas, are not reviewed and
reported upon in a regular and effective way, by key stakeholders and independent
observers.
This is a common failing.
1 2 3 4 5
Slide 16©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
5. Poor Project Reviews
Projects in Key Result Areas are a “tight”:
They must be reviewed and reported on Regularly Independently – including Project Director Quarterly or better Summary statistic on Balanced Scorecard
1 2 3 4 5
Slide 17©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
5. Poor Project Reviews
Many companies, especially those expanding overseas, have floundered when key global projects have surprised the Board:
Regular reviews are about risk management Ensure ongoing alignment with the business Ensure project does not have “a life of its own” Ensure that good money is not following bad.
1 2 3 4 5
Slide 18©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
6. Poor Alignment
The Structure and Culture of the organisation are not aligned with and continuously reviewed
against the Strategy and Execution plan –
resulting in excessive friction and waste in execution - and ultimately an inability to deliver
against the Strategy without extra and excessive attention and resources.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Slide 19©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
6. Poor Alignment
Exceptional performance comes from:
Peak human performance Peak business performance, and
Relates to clarity, consistency and commitment
Better aligned organisations perform better
1 2 3 4 5 6
Slide 20©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
6. Poor Alignment
Once Strategy is right, and the Execution can be conceived, there must be alignment of Structure and Culture.
Overall, alignment deals with the relationships among the people, processes, strategy, and customers of an organization relative to that organization's purpose, or what can be thought of as the "the main thing” for that organisation.
The most effective tuning and alignment of Structure and Culture enables the most effective Execution of Strategy.
1 2 3 4 5 6
Slide 21©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
The Route to Success
1. Get the Intent clear – and understand how big an effort and how risky it is to get there.
2. Build the Execution plan – and a clear link from Strategy to Actions.
3. Judge the Balance – and if it is not on the Scorecard then it is not “tight”.
4. Watch the Key Projects – since they will determine your success.
5. Align the Structure and Culture – with the Strategy and Execution.
Slide 22©2005 Walter Adamson
Strategic planning
Contact
Walter Adamson
Principal – Digital Investor Pty Ltd
Melbourne, Australia
+61 403 345 632
Skype: walter
Walter Adamson is VP Asia-Pacific of the i-mode Content Forum, at www.imodestrategy.com