Strategic Plan Report - antietames.pwcs.edu file2 Division Performance GOAL 1: All students meet...

Strategic Plan ReportStrategic Plan Report

“Providing a World-Class Education”

Quality MethodsClear Direction

Integrated Management System

October 2009

2

Division Performance

GOAL 1: All students meet high standards of performance.GOAL 2:The teaching, learning, and working environment is caring, safe and healthy, and values human diversity.GOAL 3: Family and community engagement are focused upon improved student achievement and work readiness.GOAL 4:Faculty, staff and leaders are qualified, high performing, diverse and motivated.GOAL 5:The organizational system is aligned, integrated and equitable.

3

Strategic Goal One

All students will meet high standards of performance

4

Strategic Measure 1.1.1Each year, all schools will be accredited by Virginia.

Accreditation = % of students passing SOL tests by content

* % Passing calculated for year of award using previous year’s SOL scores

School Division as a whole met performance standards set by the Virginia Board of Education for school accreditation for 5 years.

Subject 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

English 89% 89% 88% 91% 92% History 89% 87% 88% 90% 92%

Math 90% 79% 82% 86% 87% Science 87% 87% 88% 88% 90%

Virginia Accreditation Division Scores *

5

Strategic Measure 1.1.1Each year, all schools will be accredited by Virginia.*

ES = ElementaryMS = Middle School /Traditional SchoolHS = High School

* Year of Award data obtained from previous year’s SOL Scores** Godwin Middle School

Year of Award # of Schools ES MS HS Total % ES MS HS Total %

2005-06 74 49 15 10 74 100% 0 0 0 74 100%2006-07 76 51 13 10 74 97% 0 2 0 76 100%2007-08 79 53 13 10 76 96% 0 3 0 79 100%2008-09 80 53 15 10 78 98% 0 2 0 80 100%2009-10 82 55 16 10 81 99% 0 1 0 82 100%

Accredited with Warning All SchoolsFully Accredited

**

In all five years, all PWCS schools have been accredited.

6

Strategic Measure 1.1.1Each year, all schools will be accredited by Virginia.

% of Schools Accredited

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of Schools Accredited 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

# of Schools Accredited 74 76 79 80 82

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10

7

Strategic Measure 1.1.2Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly

Progress (AYP) Annual Measurable Objectives.

• Northern Virginia Divisions AYP Status 2009-10*.– Alexandria Did Not Make AYP– Arlington Did Not Make AYP – Fairfax Made AYP

– Fauquier Did Not Make AYP – Loudoun Made AYP

– Prince William Made AYP

– Stafford Made AYP

* SOL Tests administered in 2008-09 for AYP Status Year 2009-10

In 5 of the past 6 years, PWCS has made AYP.

8

Strategic Measure 1.1.2NCLB Annual Measurable Objectives (Target SOL Pass Rates)

SOL Data AYP Status2004-05 2005-06 63% 65%

2005-06 2006-07 67% 69%2006-07 2007-08 71% 73%2007-08 2008-09 75% 77%2008-09 2009-10 79% 81%2009-10 2010-11 83% 85%2010-11 2011-12 87% 89%

YearSOL Math SOL Reading

Each year, the target pass rates for making AYP increase.

9

Strategic Measure 1.1.2 Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly


PWCS 1 of 59 (45%) Virginia Divisions Making AYP

*MS includes Traditional Schools (K-8)

Year of Award

# of Schools Division ES MS* HS Total

2004-05 69 Yes 45 10 3 582005-06 73 Yes 46 12 9 672006-07 76 Yes 45 2 10 572007-08 79 No 33 3 9 452008-09 80 Yes 52 5 9 662009-10 82 Yes 43 8 8 59

The number of schools making AYP changes in relation to increasingly difficult standards and changing demographics.

10

Strategic Measure 1.1.2 Each year, schools and the Division will meet Adequate Yearly


(Red bar indicates target for 2010)

% of All Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 84% 85% 84% 88% 90%

VA Reading 81% 84% 85% 87% 89%

PW Math 85% 77% 81% 84% 87%

VA Math 84% 76% 80% 84% 86%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Targets have been met for reading and math. Over 5 years, PWCS performance has increased in reading and math.

PWCS mirrors state performance.

11

Strategic Measure 1.1.3By 2010, 25% of students will score at the Advanced Level on SOL tests.

2006-07 is the first year this target has been met for all content areas.


% of All Students Scoring Advanced on SOL Tests

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Reading 23% 40% 34% 40% 41%

Math 30% 31% 33% 40% 39%

Science 22% 24% 25% 26% 28%

Social Studies 40% 39% 39% 46% 47%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

For 3 years in a row, PWCS has met this target for all content areas.

Over 5 years, all 4 content areas have shown improvement.

12

Strategic Measure 1.1.4By 2010, 90% of students will pass the research paper

on first submission.

unexcused/unscored = 6%, failed = 5%(Red bar indicates target for 2010)

% of Students Passing Research Paper First Submission

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

% Passing 82% 81% 84% 84% 89%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

A substantial improvement was made from 2007-08 to 2008-09 on the research paper.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PWCS 58% 53% 51% 49% 48% 50%

World 62% 60% 60% 59% 58% 59%

2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

13

Strategic Measure 1.1.5By 2010, the % of tests receiving a score of 3 or higher on AP exams

will meet or exceed world averages.

Additional improvement needs to be made to reach this target.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PWCS 87% 83% 80% 82% 69%

World 86% 84% 82% 83%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

14

Strategic Measure 1.1.5 By 2010, the % of tests receiving a score of 4 or higher on IB exams

will meet or exceed world averages.

N/A*

* World Average 2009 available in December

Additional improvement needs to be made to reach this target.

15

Strategic Measure 1.1.5 By 2010, the % of tests receiving a score of E or higher on

Cambridge exams will meet or exceed world averages.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PWCS 68% 68% 54%

2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS has not been provided with the World Averages for performance on the Cambridge examinations.

16

Strategic Measure 1.2.1 Each year, subgroups will meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Annual Measurable Objectives.


% of Black Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 78% 79% 80% 83% 85%

VA Reading 70% 73% 76% 78% 81%

PW Math 76% 66% 72% 76% 80%

VA Math 73% 62% 68% 73% 77%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS black students met the targets in reading and math. Over time, black students have improved in reading and math and continue to mirror the state.

17




% of Hispanic Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 75% 76% 71% 81% 86%

VA Reading 73% 76% 72% 81% 85%

PW Math 77% 66% 72% 76% 81%

VA Math 77% 66% 71% 75% 79%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS Hispanic students met the targets in reading and math. Over time, Hispanic students have improved in reading and math and have performed slightly above the state average.

18




% of White Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 91% 92% 92% 94% 95%

VA Reading 87% 89% 90% 91% 93%

PW Math 91% 85% 88% 91% 92%

VA Math 89% 81% 85% 88% 90%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS white students met the targets in reading and math. Over time, white students have performed above the state average.

19




% of Disadvantaged Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 72% 74% 70% 79% 83%

VA Reading 69% 73% 73% 77% 81%

PW Math 74% 62% 68% 73% 78%

VA Math 74% 62% 67% 73% 77%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS disadvantaged students met the target in reading but not in math.Over time, disadvantaged students have improved and have performed slightly above the state average in reading and at the state average in math.

20




% of Students with Disabilities (SWD) Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 58% 62% 60% 67% 80%

VA Reading 56% 64% 62% 67% 73%

PW Math 62% 52% 58% 62% 76%

VA Math 61% 53% 58% 65% 71%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS students with disabilities met the target in reading but not in math.Over time, students with disabilities have improved and perform above the state average in reading and math.

21




% of LEP Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PW Reading 69% 70% 63% 77% 82%

VA Reading 70% 72% 67% 79% 83%

PW Math 72% 62% 68% 73% 78%

VA Math 77% 65% 70% 75% 79%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS limited English proficient (LEP) students met the target in reading but not in math.Over time, LEP students have improved in reading and math and perform slightly below the state average in both.

22

Strategic Measure 1.2.1 Achievement gaps for all subgroups will be reduced.


Comparison of % Passing Reading SOL Tests by NCLB Ethnic Groups

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-05 78% 75% 91%

2005-06 79% 76% 92%

2006-07 80% 71% 92%

2007-08 83% 81% 94%

2008-09 85% 86% 95%

Black Students Hispanic Students White Students

The gap among groups has decreased over time.

23


Comparison of % Passing Math SOL Tests by NCLB Ethnic Groups

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-05 76% 77% 91%

2005-06 66% 66% 85%

2006-07 72% 72% 88%

2007-08 76% 76% 91%

2008-09 80% 81% 92%

Black Students Hispanic Students White Students

The gap among groups has decreased over time.


24


% Disadvantaged vs Non Disadvantaged Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-05 72% 87% 74% 87%

2005-06 74% 89% 62% 82%

2006-07 70% 89% 68% 85%

2007-08 79% 92% 73% 88%

2008-09 83% 94% 78% 91%

Disadvantaged Reading

Non Disadvantaged Reading

Disadvantaged Math

Non Disadvantaged Math

Both groups made progress in relation to the targets over time.


25

*SWD = Students with Disabilities


% of SWD vs Non SWD Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests*

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-05 58% 86% 62% 86%

2005-06 62% 88% 52% 80%

2006-07 60% 87% 58% 83%

2007-08 67% 91% 62% 87%

2008-09 80% 92% 76% 88%

Reading - SWD Reading - Non SWD Math - SWD Math - Non SWD

Dramatic reduction in gap in reading and math over time.


26

* LEP = Limited English Proficiency


% of LEP Students vs Non LEP Students Passing Reading and Math SOL Tests*

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-05 69% 84% 72% 85%

2005-06 70% 87% 62% 79%

2006-07 63% 88% 68% 82%

2007-08 77% 91% 73% 86%

2008-09 82% 92% 78% 88%

LEP Students Reading Non LEP Students Reading

LEP Students Math Non LEP Students Math

Gap decreasing in reading and math. Both groups are making progress.


27

Strategic Measure 1.2.2Each year, increase the participation of disadvantaged and minority

students in AP, specialty, and gifted programs.

(Red arrow indicates increase)

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2004-05 14% 40% 6% 31% 7% 27%

2005-06 15% 44% 7% 34% 7% 30%

2006-07 16% 46% 8% 38% 8% 33%

2007-08 16% 48% 9% 41% 9% 35%

2008-09 19% 51% 11% 42% 11% 38%

Disadvantaged Minority Disadvantaged Minority Disadvantaged Minority

Specialty AP Gifted

Over time, participation in programs has increased among disadvantaged and minority students.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% 84% 86% 90% 88% 87%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

28

Strategic Measure 1.3.1By 2010, 90% of graduates will pursue continuing education.


Continuing education includes 2- and 4-year colleges and the military.

29

Strategic Measure 1.3.2By 2010, 60% of general education graduates will earn an Advanced

Studies Diploma.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% Advanced Diplomas 47% 48% 46% 46% 45%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

This continues to be a challenge for PWCS.

30

Strategic Measure 1.3.3By 2010, 35% of graduates will earn diploma seals.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2006-07 35% 37%

2007-08 55% 58%

2008-09 65% 70%

All GraduatesGraduates with Standard, Advanced or IB

Diplomas

Target reached each year.Beginning with 2007-08, two additional diploma seals are included.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

% of Students 27% 33% 32% 35% 37%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

31

Strategic Measure 1.3.4By 2010, 40% of 11th/12th Graders will take

AP, IB or Cambridge Classes.


Participation in advanced classes has improved over time.

32

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

AP Students 95% 96% 98% 95%

IB Students 96% 94% 95% 97%

Camb Students 90% 91%

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Strategic Measure 1.3.5By 2010, 100% of students enrolled in AP, IB, Cambridge, CTE

Licensing Classes will take corresponding exams.


* Final data will be available before the Board presentation.

N/A

PWCS pays for students to take these exams.

**

*

33

Strategic Measure 1.4.1By 2010, the average percent of attendance will be 95%.


94.95%

94.70%

95.10%

94.90%

95.30%

50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

Attendance is one of the measures included in AYP determinations for NCLB.

34

Strategic Measure 1.4.2By 2010, the graduation rate will be 85%.

Completers may not have received a Virginia Diploma(Red bar indicates target for 2010)

* Pending final data from VDOE .

Comparison of Graduation Rate NCLB and VA Completers

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

NCLB 81% 80% 80% 83% 82%

VA 87% 86% 86% 88% 88%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09**

The NCLB graduation calculation falls short of the PWCS 85% target but meets the NCLB requirement.VA completers may not have received a VA diploma.

35

Strategic Goals 2, 3, 4 and 5

Measures with Data Collection

36

Strategic Measures 2.2.1, 2.2.2

2.2.2 - Each year, no School will be identified as persistently dangerous.

•None as calculated by VDOE– 2004– 2005– 2006– 2007– 2008– 2009


2.2.1 - By 2010, the % of students who repeatedly violate the code of behavior will not exceed 1.5%.

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

Percent 1.96% 1.84% 1.74% 1.78% 1.51%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

The target for 2.2.1 was met for the first time in 2009.

37

Strategic Measure 2.2.3By 2010, 85% of students will meet Virginia wellness requirements.


% of Students Meeting Virginia Wellness Requirements

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2005 82% 73% 80% 80%

2006 83% 75% 82% 77%

2007 94% 72% 82% 84%

2008 95% 74% 83% 82%

2009 96% 76% 86% 85%

Abdominals Aerobic Upper Body Flexibility

Meeting targets in Abdominal, Upper Body, and Flexibility.Aerobic continues to be a challenge for PWCS.

38

Strategic Measure 2.3.2Each year, at least 95% of students will be housed

in permanent facilities.

% of Building Use

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

2004-05 Utilization 95% 103% 92% 96%

2005-06 Utilization 94% 103% 96% 97%

2006-07 Utilization 98% 96% 100% 98%

2007-08 Utilization 97% 90% 102% 97%

2008-09 Utilization 97% 92% 103% 98%

ES MS HS Division Total


39

Strategic Measure 4.1.1By September 2007, all teachers are Fully Certified and Endorsed.

Note: Numbers have been updated to reflect most recent information for 2005-06 and 2006-07.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2004-052005-062006-072007-082008-09

2004-05 94.40% 5.60%

2005-06 96.61% 3.39%

2006-07 96.69% 3.31%

2007-08 96.18% 3.82%

2008-09 97.27% 2.73%

Teachers Certified/Endorsed Teachers Not Certified and/or Not Endorsed

PWCS is making progress toward this NCLB requirement.

40

Strategic Measure 4.4.2By 2010, the employee retention rate will be 93%.


0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Retain 93% of employees

Retention Rate 89.45% 87.57% 88.29% 88.25% 89.65%

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

PWCS is benchmarking nationally on turnover and retention rates.

41

Strategic Measure 5.2.2Each year, funding for renovations/renewals will be 3% of

replacement value for all facilities.

Year % Value

FY 2010 2.6%FY 2011 3.8%FY 2012 2.6%FY 2013 3.8%FY 2014 2.6%

On average, PWCS is meeting this target.

42

Satisfaction Survey (1.5.1)Each year, 80% of stakeholders will be satisfied.

* Parents surveyed every 2 years(Red bar indicates target)

Goal 1 Satisfaction with Instructional Program80% of Parents, Students and Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

Teachers/TA

Parents*

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Satisfaction rates for all stakeholder groups exceeded this target.

43



Goal 2 Satisfaction with Climate80% of Students and Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

Parents*

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Satisfaction rates for all stakeholder groups except MS/HS students exceeded this target.

44



Goal 3 Satisfaction with Parent/Community Participation80% of Parents and Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

School Admin.

Teachers/TA

Parents*

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


45


(Red bar indicates target)

Goal 4 Satisfaction with Work Environment and Processes80% of Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


46



Goal 5 Satisfaction with Quality of Central Office Services80% of Staff Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Satisfaction rates for all stakeholder groups except teachers/TA met this target.

47

Satisfaction Survey (5.4.1) Each year, 80% of stakeholders will be satisfied.

* For reporting year 2008-09 Construction & Planning Services are calculated with Facilities Management


Goal 5 Overall Satisfaction Trend ReportPercent Excellent & Good

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Executive Admininstration

Communication

Information Technology

Human Resources

Accountability

Special Education

Student Learning

OSMAP

Student Services

Construction & Planning

Facilities Management*

Finance

Food Service

Risk & Security

Transportation

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09

Satisfaction rates for 14 of 15 departments met this target.

48



Goal 5 Satisfaction with Quality of School System80% of Stakeholders Will Be Satisfied

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Central Office

ES Students

MS/HS Students

School Admin.

School Support

Teachers/TA

Parents

2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09


49

Conclusions

• Meeting Goals of the Strategic Plan • Key Themes Emerge

– Theme #1: Meeting National, State, and Local Standards – Theme #2: Improving Performance in Challenging

Programs and Graduation Rate – Theme #3: Improving Achievement of Subgroups– Theme #4: Providing Safe and Healthy Environment – Theme #5: Providing and Retaining Highly Qualified Staff– Theme #6: Maintaining High Stakeholder Satisfaction

50

Challenges

• Academic Challenges– Reducing Disparities in Achievement

• Disadvantaged Students• Special Education Students

– Meeting Increasing NCLB Targets– Targeting Students At Risk of Failing– Improving Access to Challenging Programs– Graduation

• Fiscal Challenges

Moving Forward

• Strategic Plan being revised for FY 2011-15– Stakeholder input being sought through fall– New plan to be presented to School Board in January

• Summary of Proposed Changes– Planning with the end in mind – what is it that we want

graduates to be able to know and do?– Set benchmarks for each level (elementary, middle, high)– Explicit focus on reducing disproportional representation

in special education

51

Strategic Plan Report - antietames.pwcs.edu file2 Division Performance GOAL 1: All students meet...

Documents

Transcript of Strategic Plan Report - antietames.pwcs.edu file2 Division Performance GOAL 1: All students meet...