Stipulated Settlement Agreement - San Francisco … · Stipulated Settlement Agreement SUPERIOR...
Transcript of Stipulated Settlement Agreement - San Francisco … · Stipulated Settlement Agreement SUPERIOR...
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulated Settlement Agreement
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
PATRICK BIGNARDI and AARON BARRETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FLEXTRONICS AMERICA LLC; and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. RG09449663
ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO HON. STEVEN A. BRICK DEPT. 17
JOINT STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE
Complaint Filed: April 29, 2009 Trial Date: None set
This Joint Stipulation of Settlement and Release between Plaintiffs and Defendant
(hereinafter “Stipulation of Settlement” or “Settlement”) is made and entered into by and between
the parties to the following case before the Honorable Steven A. Brick of the Alameda County
Superior Court entitled Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett v. Flextronics America LLC, Case No.
RG09949663.
This Settlement shall be binding on Plaintiffs Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett
(“Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of the alleged class they represent as described herein, and
Defendant Flextronics America LLC (“Defendant”) and also applies to Defendant’s present and
former parent companies, owners, subsidiaries, related or affiliated companies, shareholders,
officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, successors and assigns, and any individual
or entity which could be jointly liable with Defendant, and its respective counsel, subject to the
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
terms and conditions hereof and the approval of the Court.
THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE as follows:
1. Plaintiffs and Defendant are collectively referred to herein as “the parties.”
2. On or about April 29, 2009, Plaintiffs1 filed a proposed Class Action Complaint in the
Alameda County Superior Court on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated.
The Complaint sought recovery of the following: 1) unpaid overtime wages, 2) unpaid meal period
wages, 3) waiting time penalties, 4) itemized wage statement violations, 5) unlawful business
practices, and 6) private attorneys general act penalties (“PAGA Claim”).
3. Defendant filed an Answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint on June 10, 2009, denying the
allegations of the Complaint and asserting numerous affirmative defenses.
4. At all times the Law Offices of Borowsky & Hayes LLP and Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff &
Lowe, LLP (jointly referred to as “Class Counsel”) have been counsel of record for Plaintiffs.
5. At all times Littler Mendelson has been counsel of record for Defendant.
6. For purposes of this Settlement, there will be two “Settlement Classes” defined as
follows: “Class One”: All California employees of Flextronics America LLC or its predecessors
who were assigned to Verizon Wireless stores and who held the position of Area Team Leader (also
referred to as Territory Manager and jointly referred to herein as “ATL”) during the period from April
29, 2005 to the date of preliminary approval (“Class One Period”). “Class Two”: All members of
Class One who held the position of ATL during the period from April 29, 2008 to the date of
preliminary approval (“Class Two Period”)”). Members of the two classes may be referred to herein
without distinction as “Class Members.”
7. Solely for purposes of settling this case, the parties stipulate and agree that the
requisites for establishing class certification with respect to both Settlement Classes have been met
and are met. More specifically, the parties stipulate and agree that, for purposes of a settlement class
action only:
1 Plaintiff Timothy Whitehead, who was classified as a Team Lead during his employment participated in the settlement of a different class action and filed a dismissal of his case. This Settlement does not cover the Team Lead position.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
a. The Settlement Classes are so numerous as to make it impracticable to join all
Class Members. There are two ascertainable Settlement Classes.
b. There are common questions of law and fact including, but not limited to, the
following:
i. Whether or not ATLs were properly classified as exempt from
overtime;
ii. Whether or not they worked overtime;
iii. Whether or not they received meal periods;
iv. Whether or not they are entitled to waiting time penalties;
v. Whether or not their paycheck stubs complied with Labor Code
section 226;
vi. Whether any of Defendant’s conduct constituted an unfair business
practice within the meaning of California Business & Professions
Code § 17200;
vii. Whether members of Class Two are entitled to recover PAGA
penalties with respect to Defendant’s alleged failure to pay overtime,
provide meal periods, provide compliant paycheck stubs and timely
paid out final wages.
c. Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of the members of both Settlement
Classes.
d. Plaintiffs and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the interests of
the Settlement Classes.
e. The prosecution of separate actions by individual Class Members would
create the risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications, which would establish
incompatible standards of conduct.
f. Questions of law and fact common to Class Members predominate over any
questions affecting any individual Class Member, and a class action is superior to
other available means for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
8. Defendant denies any liability or wrongdoing of any kind whatsoever associated with
the claims alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and further denies that, for any purpose other than the
settlement of this lawsuit, this action is appropriate for class or representative treatment.
a. With respect to the claim for overtime Defendant contends that the ATLs met
and meet all requirements to be classified as exempt employees as they were in
charge of several operating units, supervised more than two employees, made hiring
and firing recommendations that were typically followed, exercised discretion and
judgment in carrying out their job duties, were paid more than the statutory minimum
and spent more than 50% of their time carrying out exempt job duties. Plaintiffs, on
the other hand, contend that the ATLs spent more than 50% of their time carrying out
non-exempt job duties, that they did not exercise discretion and judgment in carrying
out their job duties, and that they did not meet the other requisites for establishing any
exemption from California’s overtime pay requirements.
b. With respect to the meal period claim Defendant contends that as exempt
employees ATLs were not required to receive meal periods and as such no damages
can be awarded under the Labor Code, but that in any event ATLs were provided with
the opportunity to take meal periods. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, contend that the
ATLs were non-exempt, and therefore entitled to meal periods and that they were not
provided with meal periods within the meaning of the law.
c. With respect to the Labor Code section 203 claim Defendant contends that it
did not violate the claim as all wages were timely paid out at the time of termination
for all terminated ATLs. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, contend that, since overtime
and meal period wages are owed, all wages were not timely paid out to terminated
ATLs.
d. With respect to the Labor Code section 226 claim Defendant contends that its
paycheck stubs were and are compliant as it was not required to list hours worked as
the ATLs were and are properly classified as exempt employees. Plaintiffs, on the
other hand, contend that the hours of work and pay rate information was deficient
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
because, among other reasons, ATLs are not exempt and because total hours worked,
missed meal periods, and applicable pay rates, including overtime and overtime,
were not listed.
e. With respect to the unfair business practices claim Defendant contends that
since the ATLs were properly classified as exempt no unfair business practice
occurred. Plaintiffs, on the other hand, contend that the ATLs were not properly
classified as exempt, and that the failure to pay them overtime wages and wages for
meal periods that were not provided are unfair business practices within the meaning
of California Business & Professions Code § 17200.
f. With respect to the PAGA claim Defendant contends that it committed no
violations of the Labor Code and as such no penalties are owed. Plaintiffs, on the
other hand, believe that Labor Code violations occurred and that members of Class
Two are entitled to recover penalties.
9. It is the desire of the parties to fully, finally, and forever settle, compromise, and
discharge all disputes and claims arising from or related to the claims with respect to the claims
alleged in the Complaint as well as any claims that could have been brought based on the facts
alleged in the Complaint.
10. It is the intention of the parties that this Stipulation of Settlement shall constitute a
full and complete settlement and release of all claims raised in the Complaint against Defendant or
that could have been brought based on the facts alleged in the Complaint, which release includes in
its effect all present and former parent companies, owners, subsidiaries, related or affiliated
companies, shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, and successors
and assigns of Defendant, and any individual or entity which could be jointly liable with Defendant.
Other than the aforementioned claims, no claims are being released by Class Members, except
Plaintiffs Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett, as described below.
11. Class Counsel have conducted a thorough investigation into the facts of this class
action case and have diligently pursued an investigation of Class Members’ claims against
Defendant. This included, but was not limited to deposing the Defendant with respect to the job
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
duties, hours, and exempt classification of ATLs, reviewing voluminous relevant documents,
receiving contact information for the Class Members, and interviewing many of them with respect to
their job duties and hours. Based on their independent investigation and evaluation, Class Counsel
are of the opinion that the Settlement with Defendant for the consideration and on the terms set forth
in this Stipulation of Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and is in the best interest of Class
Members in light of all known facts and circumstances, including the risk of significant delay, the
risk that a class would not be certified by the Court for trial, defenses asserted by Defendant,
disputes about the number of hours Class Members worked, and numerous potential appellate issues.
Defendant and Defendant’s counsel agree that the Settlement is in the best interest of judicial
efficiency.
12. The parties agree to cooperate and take all steps necessary and appropriate to dismiss
this case with prejudice upon Court approval of the Settlement.
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
13. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and
agreements set forth herein, the parties agree, subject to the Court’s approval, as follows:
a. It is agreed by and among Plaintiffs and Defendant that this case and any
claims, damages, or causes of action arising out of the disputes which are the subject of this case, be
settled and compromised as between the Settlement Classes and Defendant, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in this Stipulation of Settlement and the approval of the Alameda Superior Court.
b. Settlement Payment: Defendant agrees to pay One Million One Hundred And
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,150,000.00) (“Total Settlement Payment”), which shall
fully resolve and satisfy all claims for attorney’s fees and costs, all payments to Class
Members provided for under this Settlement, service payments to the Plaintiffs, and
the costs of paying a Claims Administrator to administer the Settlement. It is
understood and agreed that Defendant’s maximum total liability under this Settlement
shall not exceed the Total Settlement Payment, except for employer tax contributions
that Defendant is responsible for paying in connection with the portions of settlement
payments to Class Members under this Settlement that represent payments for wages.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
There shall be no reversion of any part of the Total Settlement Payment.
c. “Effective Date”: The settlement embodied in this Stipulation of Settlement
shall become effective when all of the following events have occurred: (i) this
Stipulation of Settlement has been executed by all parties and by Class Counsel and
counsel for Defendant; (ii) the Court has given preliminary approval to the settlement;
(iii) notice has been given to the putative members of the Settlement Classes,
providing them with an opportunity to submit claim forms to participate in the
Settlement or to opt out of the Settlement; (iv) the Court has held a final approval
hearing and entered a final order and judgment certifying the Class, dismissing the
class action case with prejudice, and approving this Stipulation of Settlement; and (v)
if there are no objections, then 30 days after entry of the final order; in the event there
are written objections filed prior to the final approval hearing which are not later
withdrawn, it will become final after the later of the following events: if no appeal is
filed, then 60 days after the entry of the final order, or, if an appeal is filed, upon the
final dismissal of the appeal, writ or other appellate proceeding having been filed.
The Parties’ intention in defining the “Effective Date” in these terms is to have the
Settlement become effective when settlement approval has become final in
accordance with the terms of this paragraph.
d. Net Settlement Fund: The “Net Settlement Fund” shall be calculated by
deducting from the Total Settlement Payment the sums set forth in Paragraph 15 as
the anticipated payments under this Settlement for attorneys’ fees (up to 25%, which
is $287,500), costs (up to $15,000 or less), service payments (up to $15,000.00 to
each named Plaintiff), and costs of claims administration, which are estimated to be a
maximum of $11,000. Settlement awards to qualifying Class Members will be
calculated by the Claims Administrator, and paid out of the Net Settlement Fund as
set forth below. In the event the Court awards less than the fees, costs and service
payments above, the difference shall be added to the Net Settlement Fund and
distributed to the Class Members in Class One.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
e. Distribution of the Net Settlement Fund: The Net Settlement Fund is
estimated to be approximately $806,500 and shall be distributed in its entirety to
qualifying Class Members (and the California Labor and Workforce Development
Agency) as follows:
i. Settlement Awards Calculation For Class One: The amount of the Net
Settlement Fund, minus $20,000, (hereinafter the “Class One
Amount”) shall be distributed in its entirety to non-opt out Class
Members who submit valid claims as described below (“Qualifying
Class One Members”). Qualifying Class One Members’ shares of the
Class One Amount shall be calculated pro rata based on (a) the total
number of workweeks worked by Qualifying Class One Members as
ATLs during the Class One Period and (b) the Average Weekly Salary
of Qualifying Class One Members during their period of employment
as ATLs during the Class One Period (The Average Weekly Salary
shall be the average of the Qualifying Class One Member’s weekly
salary rate at the start of his or her employment as an ATL during the
Class One Period and his or her weekly salary rate at the end of his or
employment as an ATL during the Class One Period.) For each
Qualifying Class One Member, the Claims Administrator shall
multiply the total number of workweeks worked by Qualifying Class
One Member during the Class One Period by the Qualifying Class One
Member’s Average Weekly Salary to determine an “individual
numerator” for the Qualifying Class One Member. The sum of all
Qualifying Class One Members’ individual numerators shall constitute
the “class one denominator.” Each Qualifying Class One Member’s
individual numerator will be divided by the class one denominator to
determine his or her pro rata share factor. Each Qualifying Class One
Member’s share of the Class One Amount shall then be computed by
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
multiplying his or her pro rata share factor by the Class One Amount.
ii. Settlement Awards Calculation For Class Two: The amount of
$20,000 (“Class Two Amount”) is for settlement of PAGA claims and
shall be distributed in its entirety to (i) non-opt out members of Class
Two who submit timely claims as described below (“Qualifying Class
Two Members”) and (ii) the California Labor and Workforce
Development Agency (“LWDA”). Seventy-five percent (75%) of the
Class Two Amount, which is $15,000, will be paid to the LWDA. The
remaining twenty-five percent (25%), which is $5,000, will be
distributed to Qualifying Class Two Members as follows. The $5,000
will be divided by the number of workweeks worked by Qualifying
Class Two Members as ATLs during the Class Two Period to
determine a “Class Two Weekly Amount.” Each Qualifying Class
Two Member’s share of the $5,000 shall then be calculated by
multiplying the Class Two Weekly Amount by the number of weeks
the Qualifying Class Two Member worked as an ATL during the Class
Two Period.
iii. Allocation Of Settlement Awards and Computation of Employer Tax
Payments: Fifty percent of the monies paid out to Class Members
from the Net Settlement Fund are considered wages and will be
subject to tax withholdings. The other fifty percent shall be considered
payment for all other damages, including interest, penalties, and
statutory attorney’s fees and costs. To the extent necessary, IRS Form
W-2s will be issued to each Class Member reflecting their payments
for the wage payment portion and Form 1099s will be issued for all
other damages and interest. In addition to the Total Settlement
Payment of $1,150,000, Defendant shall be responsible for paying the
amounts of employer tax contributions (e.g., FICA, FUTA) for the
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
portions of the payments to Class Members paid for wages (“Employer
Tax Payments”). The amounts of the Employer Tax Payments shall be
calculated by the Claims Administrator.
iv. Settlement Awards Do Not Trigger Additional Benefits: It is
expressly understood and agreed that the receipt of settlement
payments will not entitle any Class Member to additional
compensation or benefits under any company bonus, contest or other
compensation or benefit plan or agreement in place during the period
covered by the Settlement, nor will it entitle any Class Member to any
increased retirement, 401k benefits or matching benefits, or deferred
compensation benefits. It is the intent of this Settlement that the
settlement awards provided for in this Agreement are the sole
payments to be made by Defendant to the Class Members, and that the
Class Members are not entitled to any new or additional compensation
or benefits as a result of having received the settlement payments
(notwithstanding any contrary language or agreement in any benefit or
compensation plan document that might have been in effect during the
period covered by this Settlement).
f. Attorneys’ Fees: Subject to Court approval and/or modification, Defendant
further agrees to pay attorneys’ fees from the Total Settlement Payment as set forth in
Paragraph 15 below.
g. Costs: Subject to Court approval, Defendant does not object to the payment
of up to $15,000 from the Total Settlement Payment for costs and expenses incurred
by Class Counsel in prosecuting this case. Should Class Counsel request a lesser
amount and/or the Court approve a lesser amount, the difference shall be added to the
Net Settlement Fund apportioned for payment to Settlement Class One. The costs
will be paid in their entirety in the amount claimed and/or awarded to Class Counsel.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
h. Class Representatives: Subject to Court approval, Defendant does not object
to the payment of not more than Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) from the Total
Settlement Payment to each named plaintiff, Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett, as
service payments for their service as Class Representatives. These payments are in
addition to the Plaintiffs’ shares of the Net Settlement Fund. Defendant will issue
IRS Forms 1099 for the service payments to the named Class Representatives for
their service as Class Representatives, and the Class Representatives will be
responsible for correctly characterizing this compensation for tax purposes and for
paying any taxes on the amount received. Should the Court approve a service
payment to the Class Representatives in an amount less than that set forth above, the
difference shall be added to the Net Settlement Fund apportioned for payment to
Class One and distributed to the Class Members accordingly.
i. Claims Administrator: The parties agree that the cost of the Claims
Administrator associated with the administration of this Settlement shall be taken
from the Total Settlement Payment, and it is estimated that this will be a maximum of
$11,000. In the event the actual amount for claims administration is less, then the
difference shall be added to the Net Settlement Fund apportioned for payment to
Class One and distributed to the Class Members accordingly. Subject to Court
approval, the Claims Administrator shall be the Garden City Group.
j. Funding of the Net Settlement Fund and Employer Tax Payments by
Defendant: It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Claims Administrator
shall be responsible for paying the settlement awards to Qualifying Class One
Members and Qualifying Class Two Members (collectively, “Qualifying Class
Members”), and for paying the Employer Tax Payments to the applicable taxing
authorities, from an account to be established for these purposes by the Claims
Administrator and funded by Defendant. No later than five (5) business days after the
Effective Date, Defendant shall wire to the account established by the Claims
Administrator (i) the amount of the Net Settlement Fund, and (ii) the total amount of
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
the Employer Tax Payments as calculated by the Claims Administrator.
k. Claim Forms and Request for Exclusion: Under the schedule set forth below,
each Class Member shall be sent a “Notice Packet” containing a Notice of Pendency
of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, and a “Claim Form,” with pre-printed
information based on Defendant’s information provided to the Claims Administrator
and Class Counsel, stating the dates worked by the Class Member as an ATL during
the Class One Period. In order to be a Qualifying Class Member entitled to receive a
settlement award, a Class Member must not opt out and must also mail or deliver a
fully-completed Claim Form so that it is received by the Claims Administrator no
later than forty-five (45) days after the date that the Claims Administrator mails the
Notice Packets to all Class Members. In order to exclude him/herself from the
Settlement Classes, a Class Member must mail or deliver a written, signed statement
requesting exclusion so that it is received by the Claims Administrator no later than
forty-five (45) days after the date that the Claims Administrator mails the Notice
Packets to all Class Members. Among other information, the Notice of Pendency of
Class Action and Proposed Settlement will inform Class Members of the required
procedures and deadlines for submitting Claims Forms and requests for exclusion. A
Class Member who submits a valid and timely request for exclusion will not
participate in or be bound by the Settlement and the Judgment. A Class Member who
does not submit a timely and valid written exclusion request from the Settlement in
the manner and by the deadline specified above will be bound by all terms and
conditions of the Settlement, if the Settlement is approved by the Court, and by the
Judgment, even if the Class Member does not submit a timely and valid Claim Form.
The Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement will also notify the
Class Members that any objection to the settlement must be mailed or delivered to the
Claims Administrator so that it is received no later than forty-five (45) days after the
Claims Administrator mails out the Notice Packet to all Class Members, and provide
the specific procedure that must be followed to submit an objection in writing. No
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
class member may object orally at the final fairness hearing unless he or she has
timely filed a proper objection in writing. If a Class Member opts out of the
Settlement s/he has no right to object to it.
l. Resolution of Disputes Relating to Length of Time That a Class Member
Worked in a Covered Position: The pre-printed information on the Claim Form
regarding dates of employment as an ATL based on the information provided by
Defendant’s information shall be presumed to be correct. A Class Member may
challenge the pre-printed information on the Claim Form only if he or she mails or
delivers, along with his or her completed Claim Form, a written dispute to the Claims
Administrator so that it is received no later than forty-five (45) days after the date that
the Claims Administrator mails the Notice Packet to all Class Members and presents
documents showing that a different number of workweeks were worked as an ATL
during the Class Period. The Claims Administrator will promptly notify the parties of
any disputed received and the parties’ counsel will make a good faith effort to resolve
any such disputes informally, or, if they cannot agree, the Claims Administrator will
resolve the dispute as follows. The Claims Administrator will review Defendant’s
records and the information and documents submitted by the Class Member and issue
a non-appealable decision as to the inclusive dates the class member worked for
Defendant as an ATL during the Class Period. No Class Member dispute may be
sustained by the Claims Administrator without supporting documentation (such as
pay stubs or other records).
m. Payment of Service Payments to Class Representatives: Defendant will pay
the service payments approved by the Court to Plaintiffs Patrick Bignardi and Aaron
Barrett on the same date Class Counsel are paid their attorneys’ fees and costs.
n. Right to Rescission by Defendant: If more than ten percent (10%) of the
Class Members opt out of the settlement by submitting valid and timely requests for
exclusion, Defendant has the right in its sole discretion to rescind and void the
parties’ Settlement by giving written notice to Class Counsel at least ten (10) business
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
days prior to the final approval hearing.
o. Right To Rescission By Plaintiff: If the number of ATL workweeks reported
to the Claims Administrator and Class Counsel is more than 5% higher than the
number of ATL workweeks in the class data provided by Defendant in discovery as to
the time period that was covered by Defendant’s discovery response, then Plaintiffs
may, at their option void this Agreement unless Defendant agrees to increase the
common fund by the same percentage differential. All parties understand that the
number of workweeks has gone up since the information was produced in late 2009
and that such increase, based on the weeks worked after the time period covered by
the discovery responses, is not a part of this calculation and will not provide Plaintiffs
with the right to void this Agreement.
p. In addition, and subject to the obligation(s) of Mutual Full Cooperation set
forth below, either Party may terminate this Settlement if the Court declines to enter
the Preliminary Approval Order, the Final Approval Order or final judgment in
substantially the form submitted by the Parties, or the Stipulation of Settlement as
agreed does not become final because of appellate court action. The terminating
Party shall give to the other Party (through its counsel) written notice of its decision
to terminate no later than twenty (20) days after receiving notice that one of the
enumerated events has occurred. Termination shall have the following effects:
i. The Settlement Agreement shall be terminated and shall have no force
or effect, and no Party shall be bound by any of its terms.
ii. In the event the Settlement is terminated, Defendant shall have no
obligation to make any payments to any party, class member or
attorney, except that Defendant shall pay the Claims Administrator for
services rendered up to the date the Claims Administrator is notified
that the Settlement has been terminated.
iii. The Preliminary Approval Order, Final Approval Order and Judgment,
including any order of class certification, shall be vacated.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
iv. The Stipulation of Settlement and all negotiations, statements and
proceedings relating thereto shall be without prejudice to the rights of
any of the Parties, all of whom shall be restored to their respective
positions in the Lawsuit prior to the settlement.
v. Except as otherwise discoverable, neither this Stipulated Settlement,
nor any ancillary documents, actions, statements or filings in
furtherance of settlement (including all matters associated with the
mediation) shall be admissible or offered into evidence in the Lawsuit
or any other action for any purpose whatsoever.
CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION
14. The Claims Administrator will send out the Notice Packets to the Class Members.
The Claims Administrator will independently review the Claim Forms and documentation, based on
Defendant’s information provided to the Claims Administrator, as to the number of workweeks
worked by the Class Members during the Class Periods and will calculate the amounts due to Class
Members in accordance with this Stipulation of Settlement. The Claims Administrator shall report,
in summary or narrative form, the substance of its findings. The Claims Administrator shall be
granted reasonable access to Defendant’s records in order to perform its duties, if the Claims
Administrator submits a written request to review Defendant’s records to Defendant’s counsel.
Defendant shall comply with all such written requests within five days. All disputes relating to the
Claims Administrator’s performance of its duties shall be referred to the Court, if necessary, which
will have continuing jurisdiction over the terms and conditions of this Stipulation of Settlement until
all payments and obligations contemplated by this Stipulation of Settlement have been fully carried
out. Class Counsel shall be given access to information to be able to verify and monitor the proper
administration and carrying out of the terms of this Settlement. Class Counsel will not be provided
with social security numbers for the Class Members except upon a Court Order based on a showing
of good cause.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
15. In consideration for settling this matter and in exchange for the release of all claims
by the Settlement Class, and subject to final approval and/or modification by the Court, Defendant
does not object to the payment to Class Counsel of attorneys’ fees up to 25% of the Total Settlement
Payment, which fees would be $287,500. The attorneys’ fees are to compensate Class Counsel for all
the work already performed in this case, and all the work remaining to be performed in documenting
the Settlement, securing Court approval of the Settlement, making sure the Settlement is fairly
administered and implemented, and obtaining dismissal with prejudice. Should Class Counsel
request a lesser amount and/or the Court approve a lesser amount of attorneys’ fees and/or costs and
expenses, the difference shall be added to the Net Settlement Fund apportioned for payment to
Settlement Class One and distributed to the Class Members accordingly. The attorneys’ fees and
costs approved by the Court shall be paid to Class Counsel within five (5) days of the Effective Date.
This means, for example, that if final approval is granted, and there are no objections, that the fees
will be paid 35 days after final approval is granted.
NOTICE TO THE CLASS
16. A Notice of Pendency of Class Action, Proposed Settlement and Hearing Date for
Final Court Approval (“Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement”) in
approximately the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and as approved by the Court, shall be sent
by the Claims Administrator to the Class Members, by first class mail. Enclosed with the Notice of
Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement will be a Claim Form in approximately the form
attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and as approved by the Court. Any returned envelopes from this
mailing with forwarding addresses will be utilized by the Claims Administrator to forward the
Notice and Claim Form to the Class Members.
a. Within seven (7) calendar days of the preliminary approval of this Settlement
Agreement, Defendant shall provide to the Claims Administrator information
containing the name, last known address and social security number of each Class
Member, the date when the Class Member became an ATL and the end date of when
the Class Member stopped being an ATL, or if the Class Member is still an ATL a
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
statement to that effect, the Class Member’s salary as an Area Team Leader at the
start of the Class Member’s period of employment as an Area Team Leader during
the Class Period, and the Class Member’s salary as an Area Team Leader at the end
of the Class Member’s period of employment as an Area Team Leader during the
Class Period. This database information shall be provided in a format that is
compatible with the Claims Administrator. Defendant agrees to consult with the
Claims Administrator prior to the production date to ensure that the format will be
compatible with the Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator will run a
check of the Class Members’ addresses against those on file with the U.S. Postal
Service’s National Change of Address List; this check will be performed only once
per Class Member by the Claims Administrator. Within twenty (20) calendar days of
the granting of Preliminary Approval, the Claims Administrator will mail the Notice
and Claim Form to the Class Members and transmit copies of the updated database to
Class Counsel and defense counsel.
b. Notices and Claim Forms returned to the Claims Administrator as non-
delivered during the forty-five day period for the filing of claims shall be resent
within five (5) days to the forwarding address, if any, on the returned envelope. For
Class Members whose Notice and Claim Form is returned as undeliverable and who
are currently employed by Defendant, Defendant shall request such individual to
provide an updated address and forward such addresses to the Claim Administrator
for remailing. If there is no updated or forwarding address provided, or for Class
Members who are former employees, the Claims Administrator may do a computer
search for a new address using the Class Member’s social security number; this
search need only be performed once per Class Member by the Claims Administrator.
Upon completion of these steps by the Claims Administrator, Defendant shall be
deemed to have satisfied their obligation to provide the Notice of Pendency of Class
Action and Settlement to the affected member of the Settlement Class. The affected
member of the Settlement Class shall remain a member of the Settlement Class and
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
18 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
shall be bound by all the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement and the Court’s Order
and Final Judgment.
c. If a Claim Form is timely received but deficient, the Claims Administrator
shall send one deficiency notice to the Class Member advising the Class Member to
cure the deficiency. The deficiency notice will give the Class Member no less than
ten (10) calendar days from the date of mailing of the deficiency notice to cure the
deficiency, even if after the claims period has expired.
d. The Claims Administrator shall provide to Class Counsel for filing with the
Court, at least ten (10) days prior to the final approval hearing, a declaration by the
Claims Administrator of due diligence and proof of mailing with regard to the
mailing of the Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement.
CLAIMS PROCESS
17. No opt out request will be honored if late received, unless counsel for Defendant and
Class Counsel mutually agree to accept the late opt out notice.
18. The Claims Administrator will certify jointly to Class Counsel and Defendant’s
Counsel what claims and opt outs were timely filed. Upon completion of its calculation of
payments, the Claims Administrator shall provide Class Counsel, Defendant’s Counsel and
Defendant with a report listing the amount of all payments to be made to each Class Member and the
amounts of the Employer’s Tax Payments to Class Members will be mailed by the Claims
Administrator within ten days after the Claims Administrator receives payment from the Defendant
within the time set forth above (which is within five (5) business days of the Effective Date). Proof
of payment will be filed with the Court by the Class Counsel after it receives notice from the Claims
Administrator that the payments have been mailed. Settlement award checks shall remain valid and
negotiable for ninety (90) days from the date of their issuance. The money from any checks not
cashed after ninety (90) days shall be donated to the Legal Aid Society of San Francisco-
Employment Law Center or such other charitable organization approved by the Court whose mission
bears a nexus to the underlying claims in this class action lawsuit.. Any funds allocated for payment
of the Claims Administrator that were not used for that purpose and that were not ascertained in time
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
19 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
to be included in settlement awards to Qualifying Class Members as provided above shall likewise
be paid to the Legal Aid Society of San Francisco-Employment Law Center or such other charitable
organization approved by the Court.
RELEASE BY THE CLASS
19. a. Upon the final approval by the Court of this Stipulation of Settlement,
and except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Stipulation of
Settlement, the Settlement Class and each member of the Class who has not submitted
a valid request for exclusion, fully releases and discharges Defendant, its present and
former parent companies, owners, subsidiaries, related or affiliated companies,
shareholders, officers, directors, employees, agents, attorneys, insurers, successors
and assigns, and any individual or entity which could be jointly liable with Defendant
or any of them, from any and all claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations,
guarantees, costs, expenses, attorneys’ fees, damages, action or causes of action for,
damages due to an alleged failure to pay overtime (including the straight time
component of any claimed overtime hours), timely pay wages, provide meal periods,
pay a premium for missed meal periods, failure to provide compliant wage
statements, or any other claims that could have been brought based on the allegations
in the Complaint, including, but not limited to claims for any alleged violation of
California Code of Regulations Title 8, sections 11040, California Labor Code
sections 201, 202, 203, 204, 210, 226, 226.7, 510, 512, 558, 1174, 1174.5, and a
claim for penalties due to an alleged violation of said Labor Code sections, including
but not limited to any claims under the Private Attorney General Act (Labor Code
section 2699 et seq.), and a release of unfair business claims brought pursuant to the
Business and Professions Code based on alleged violations of the above mentioned
Labor Code sections and Regulations, as well as a release of all claimed attorneys’
fees and costs arising out of such claims, from April 29, 2005 up to and including the
date of preliminary approval. This release is limited to claims arising from
employment as an ATL.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
b. Claims not released are those not plead in the Complaint or which could not
be brought based on the facts alleged in the Complaint and there is no Civil Code
section 1542 waiver except with respect to the named Plaintiffs. Both Patrick
Bignardi and Aaron Barrett agree to provide a Civil Code Section 1542 waiver with
respect to any claims that they may have against Defendant.
c. Plaintiffs Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett hereby agree that all rights under
section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California are hereby waived by them.
Section 1542 provides as follows: “A general release does not extend to claims
which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of
executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his
or her settlement with the debtor.” As such, Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett
understand and agree that they are providing Defendant with a full and complete
release of any and all claims, known or unknown, that each may have against
Defendant.
DUTIES OF THE PARTIES PRIOR TO COURT APPROVAL
20. The parties shall promptly submit this Stipulation of Settlement to the Alameda
Superior Court in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval and determination by the
Court as to its fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness. Promptly upon execution of this Stipulation
of Settlement, the parties shall apply to the Court for the entry of an order substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, which shall include:
a. Scheduling a final approval hearing as soon as practicable with the Court’s
calendar ninety (90) days after preliminary approval is granted by the Court, on the
question of whether the proposed Settlement, including payment of attorneys’ fees
and costs, and the Class Representatives’ service payments, should be finally
approved as fair, reasonable and adequate as to the members of the Settlement Class;
b. Certifying a Settlement Class, Plaintiffs Patrick Bignardi and Aaron Barrett as
the class representatives, and the law firms listed in paragraph 4 as Class Counsel;
c. Approving as to form and content the proposed Notice of Pendency of Class
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
21 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
Action and Proposed Settlement;
d. Approving as to form and content the proposed Claim Form;
e. Approving as to the process by which Class Members may seek exclusion;
f. Directing the mailing of the Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed
Settlement, and the Claim Form by first class mail to the Class Members;
g. Preliminarily approving the Settlement subject only to the objections of Class
Members and final review by the Court; and
h. Enjoining all Class Members from filing or prosecuting any claims, suits or
administrative proceedings (including filing claims with the California Division of
Labor Standards Enforcement and LWDA) unless and until such Class Members have
filed valid Exclusion requests with the Claims Administrator and the time for filing
claims with the Claims Administrator has elapsed.
21. Prior to the final approval hearing, Class Counsel will prepare and, after review and
approval by Defendant, submit to the Court a proposed final order and judgment of dismissal,
including:
a. Approving the Settlement, adjudging the terms thereof to be fair, reasonable
and adequate, and directing consummation of its terms and provisions;
b. Approving Class Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and
reimbursement of costs;
c. Approving the service payment to the Class Representatives; and
d. Dismissing the entire action with prejudice and permanently barring and
enjoining all members of the Settlement Classes from prosecuting against Defendant,
its present or former parent companies, including but not limited to, subsidiaries,
related or affiliated companies, owners, shareholders, officers, directors, employees,
agents, attorneys, insurers, and successors and assigns, and any individual or entity
which could be jointly liable with Defendant or any of them, any individual or class
or collective claims released herein pursuant to Paragraph 20 above.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
22 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
PARTIES’ AUTHORITY
22. The signatories hereto hereby represent that they are fully authorized to enter into this
Stipulation of Settlement and bind the parties hereto to the terms and conditions thereof.
MUTUAL FULL COOPERATION
23 The parties agree to fully cooperate with each other to accomplish the terms of this
Stipulation of Settlement, including but not limited to, execution of such documents and taking such
other action as reasonably may be necessary to implement the terms of this Stipulation of Settlement.
The parties to this Stipulation of Settlement shall use their best efforts, including all efforts
contemplated by this Stipulation of Settlement and any other efforts that may become necessary by
order of the Court, or otherwise, to effectuate this Stipulation of Settlement and the terms set forth
herein. As soon as practicable after execution of this Stipulation of Settlement, Class Counsel shall,
with the assistance and cooperation of Defendant and its counsel, take all necessary steps to secure
the Court’s final approval of this Stipulation of Settlement.
24. Defendant and its counsel agree that they will not attempt to encourage or discourage
Class Members from filing Claim Forms or seeking exclusion. Defendant will take no action in
retaliation against any employee who asserts any rights in connection with this case. Defendant r
will not initiate contact or communication with class members about this case. However, if
Defendant is asked a question about the settlement by a class member Defendant may tell the class
member that participating is their choice, that retaliation will not occur if they choose to participate,
and that if they have any other questions they should follow the process explained in the notice of
settlement. Apart from this, Defendant shall not say any more than is necessary to answer the class
member’s specific question and shall not offer any opinions about the case or make any statements
to suggest in any way that there may be a benefit or advantage to opting out or not submitting a
claim. Plaintiffs and Class counsel agree they will not attempt to encourage or discourage Class
Members from filing Claim Forms or seeking exclusion. It is understood, however, that Class
Counsel may provide legal advice and counsel to Class Members who seek such advice from them
and may provide appropriate information to Class Members concerning their rights and the factors
underlying the claims in this case and the Settlement.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
NO PRIOR ASSIGNMENTS
25. The parties and their counsel represent, covenant, and warrant that they have not
directly or indirectly, assigned, transferred, encumbered, or purported to assign, transfer, or
encumber to any person or entity any portion of any liability, claim, demand, action, cause of action
or rights herein released and discharged except as set forth herein.
NO ADMISSION
26. Nothing contained herein, nor the consummation of this Stipulation of Settlement, is
to be construed or deemed an admission of liability, culpability, negligence, or wrongdoing on the
part of Defendant or any of them. Each of the parties hereto has entered into this Stipulation of
Settlement solely with the intention to avoid further disputes and litigation with the attendant
inconvenience and expenses. In the event the Court does not give final approval to the settlement,
this stipulation and any documents submitted to the Court by either party in support of this
settlement shall have no force and effect and may not be used by either party for any purposes not
connected with this settlement, such as opposing or supporting a contested motion for class
certification, but such exclusion shall not include any appeal from the grant or denial of approval of
the settlement.
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
27. In the event that one or more of the parties to this Stipulation of Settlement institutes
any legal action or other proceeding against any other party or parties to enforce the provisions of
this Stipulation of Settlement or to declare rights and/or obligations under this Stipulation of
Settlement, the successful party or parties shall be entitled to recover from the unsuccessful party or
parties reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, including expert witness fees incurred in connection
with any enforcement actions and interest at the legal rate in the event the action is to enforce
payment obligations.
NOTICES
28. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, all notices, demands or other
communications given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given as
of the third business day after mailing by United States registered or certified mail, return receipt
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
24 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
requested, addressed as follows:
To Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class:
Kenneth J. Sugarman, Esq. Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe, LLP 351 California Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 434-9800 Facsimile: (415) 434-0513 Philip Borowsky Borowsky & Hayes LLP 100 Spear Street, Suite 1640 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 896-6800 Facsimile: (415) 896-0600
To the Defendant:
Jody A. Landry, Esq. Littler Mendelson 501 West Broadway, Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 232-0441 Facsimile: (619) 232-4302
CONSTRUCTION
29. The parties hereto agree that the terms and conditions of this Stipulation of
Settlement are the result of lengthy, intensive arms-length negotiations between the parties, and this
Stipulation of Settlement shall not be construed in favor of or against any party by reason of the
extent to which any party or his, her or its counsel participated in the drafting of this Stipulation of
Settlement.
CAPTIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS
30. Paragraph titles or captions contained herein are inserted as a matter of convenience
and for reference, and in no way define, limit, extend, or describe the scope of this Stipulation of
Settlement or any provision hereof. Each term of this Stipulation of Settlement is contractual and
not merely a recital.
LITTLER MENDELSON A P R O F E S S I O N A L C O R P O R A T I O N
5 0 1 W . B r o a d w a y S u i t e 9 0 0
S a n D i e g o , C A 9 2 1 0 1 . 3 5 7 7 6 1 9 . 2 3 2 . 0 4 41
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
25 Stipulated Settlement Agreement
MODIFICATION
31. This Stipulation of Settlement may not be changed, altered, or modified, except in
writing and signed by the parties hereto, and approved by the Court. This Stipulation of Settlement
may not be discharged except by performance in accordance with its terms or by a writing signed by
the parties hereto.
INTEGRATION CLAUSE
32. This Stipulation of Settlement contains the entire agreement between the parties
relating to the settlement and transaction contemplated hereby, and all prior or contemporaneous
agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, whether oral or written and whether by
a party or such party’s legal counsel, are merged herein. No rights hereunder may be waived except
in writing.
BINDING ON ASSIGNS
33. This Stipulation of Settlement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective heirs, trustees, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
CLASS COUNSEL SIGNATORIES
34. It is agreed that because the members of the Class are so numerous, it is impossible or
impractical to have each member of the Class execute this Stipulation of Settlement. The Notice of
Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Exhibit “A” hereto, will advise all Class
Members of the binding nature and scope of the release, and the release shall have the same force
and effect as if this Stipulation of Settlement were executed by each member of the Class.
[continues on next page]