Steve Raymer, Division Director Idowu Balogun, Assistant ... · Subject: RE: Revised - Expanded Q &...

TL 5 and MS 1 STAFFING

Steve Raymer, Division Director Idowu Balogun, Assistant “A”

Terry B. Martinez, Assistant “B”

TL 5 and MS 1 Manuals

From: LeFevre, Terry C - Merrifield, VATo: #LR Area MgrsCc: Devine, Patrick M - Washington, DC; Bunnell, Thomas A - Greensboro HR Shared Srv Cntr; Bratta, Dominic L -

Merrifield, VA; Coffey, Todd C - Washington, DC; Dean, Rickey R - Washington, DC; Adona, Jacqueline D -Washington, DC; Virk, Vijay V - Washington, DC; Brenker, Robert C - Washington, DC; Steven Raymer

Subject: RE: Revised - Expanded Q & As re: MOU MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and Maintenance Craft PSE ConversionDate: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:02:41 PMAttachments: MS-47 Additional Q & A 08062014 1455.docx

All, Attached are the latest agreed upon Q & A’s. Q. #28 has been added further clarifying Q. #1. Pleaseuse the file attached as the most recent guidance

Terry C LeFevreLabor Relations SpecialistContract Administration (APWU)(717)[email protected]

From: LeFevre, Terry C - Merrifield, VA Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 1:05 PMTo: #LR Area MgrsCc: Devine, Patrick M - Washington, DC; Bunnell, Thomas A - Greensboro HR Shared Srv Cntr; Bratta,Dominic L - Merrifield, VA; Coffey, Todd C - Washington, DC; Dean, Rickey R - Washington, DC; Adona,Jacqueline D - Washington, DC; Virk, Vijay V - Washington, DC; Brenker, Robert C - Washington, DC;''Steven Raymer' ([email protected])'Subject: Revised - Expanded Q & As re: MOU MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and Maintenance Craft PSEConversionImportance: High All, Former Question #26 regarding the acceptability of the August 9 conversion date has been removedas we have not mutually agreed on the answer. Please use this file version of the Q & A forreference to mutually agreed responses.

Terry C LeFevreLabor Relations SpecialistContract Administration (APWU)(717)[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

MS-47 Maintenance MOU Questions

1. Are PSE conversions to newly created positions that will match current PSE schedules that exceed the current authorized custodian staffing considered UAR positions? If they are considered valid, full time regular or part time regular placements that are part of current MS-47 staffing, do the newly created positions need to posted to the installation per the contract?

A. PSEs should be considered as assigned to the position they are converted into. These jobs are not to be posted for bid except in accordance with Article 38. They are considered “filled” by the PSE that was converted.

2. Does this MOU eliminate the need for conversions based on District and/or Installation seniority registers for the purpose of converting PSE custodians on the rolls prior to the signing of the MOU?

A. Conversions that have occurred and resulted in a scheduled reporting date (award) should be completed. Further conversions as required by the March 28 MOU up to October 31 are no longer required and remaining PSEs will be converted IAW the July 9, MOU Re: MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and the Maintenance Craft PSE Conversions. Per item 4 of the July 9 MOU, the remainder of the March 28, MOU including provisions for career conversion remain in effect. Also see answer 12 below.

3. If there are more residual positions, FTR/PTR, then there are PSE custodians in an installation, will the remaining residual positions be filled by in-service registers and other means per the JCIM (Item 7B forward)? Must they be held pending reversion or can the position be reverted if these positions are not authorized under the current MS-47?

A. Remaining residual vacancies may be filled IAW Article 38 and the pecking order established in the JCAM and the March 28, Maintenance PSE Conversion MOU, or may be reverted or held pending reversion IAW Article 38 or the MOU Re: MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and the Maintenance Craft PSE Conversions.

4. If a position is held pending reversion, is there a requirement to cover this position with a PSE hire as long as there is room within the cap? If there is no room within the cap, what other options are permitted under the MOU?

A. When a position held pending reversion remains required as part of the current staffing package it may be covered with a PSE if there is room in the cap. (See MOU #11) If there is no room within the PSE cap to cover a required position the position should be filled IAW Article 38, JCIM and applicable MOU’s.

5. The MOU indicates PSEs converted to regular will have the option to return to their former installation/position, if the position is still available. Would the starting point for these reviews be conversions done on or after March 20, 2014?

A. Yes

6. The Area has two Districts that provided the required local notification to the APWU for excessing to the needs of the section based on recent WHEP’s. This occurred prior to July 9, 2014. Higher level impacted occupational codes, including MOS clerks, were to be offered lower level residual custodian positions in these offices. Will we be continuing with the excessing within the installation and within the craft and holding residual positions for the excessing? How will the Districts be handling the PSE custodian conversions in these installations if excessing is to continue within the installation? Would the PSE’s be converted to UAR schedules until the excessing is completed?

A. This should not impact plans to excess other occupational groups except by reducing the number of available custodial vacancies.

7. If an installation is under the MS-47 TL-3 authorized staffing and there are residual positions that exceed that authorized staffing, does Item 11 of the MOU give the installation the ability to revert these positions as long as the reversion occurs within 120 days of the signing of the MOU?

A. Remaining residual vacancies that are in excess of the required staffing may be reverted. See item 11 of the MOU.

8. By “in place” conversions, this means there will be no preferencing by seniority for residual positions within an installation correct?

A. There will be no seniority consideration for different assignments as a result of the conversion. Subsequent bidding will be IAW the posting and filling of positions per Article 38.

9. How are we to handle a custodian PSE that does not have a regular schedule for conversion purposes?

A. The parties will need to make that determination locally. PSE’s should be covering duty assignments.

10. If the Custodian PSE schedule includes work in more than one installation with no more than 30 minutes of unpaid travel time per the Maintenance MOU for insourced work, is it a local determination for assignment of the position for the purpose of the MS-47? And how will that be credited for the 90% threshold when the installations are moved to the new model?

A. Conversion to career does not necessarily impact these assignments. The work hours will be reported as agreed to by the parties per item 6 in the MOUI.

11. Are Custodian PSE’s allowed to decline the “in place” conversions?

A. No

12. Under Item 2, any PSE who “has made a selection of a duty assignment for conversion”, would this include preferencing selections that had been made but not yet finalized by HQ’s through the due diligence process and so not yet communicated to the employee?

A. Employees who have already been assigned and reporting, or scheduled or expected to report, may exercise their right under item 2.

13. Will disputes that arise over this MOU continue to go through the ADR process currently in place if a local solution cannot be reached?

A. Yes

14. Are PSEs in the "1500" offices that were insourced to be included in the conversion to career?

A. Yes

15. Are the PS Form 4852 Line H calculations outlined in Item 6 of the MOU in effect for FY 2014?

A. Calculations for Line H should be prorated from July 9 through the end of FY 2014.

16. Does the term “in-place” mean “installation” or actual duty assignment/schedule the PSE is working?

A. For the purpose of this MOU “in-place” means the location and actual duty assignment being covered or if not in a specific duty assignment the schedule the PSE was assigned.

17. If we have residuals for placement of the PSEs in the installation, do we canvas the PSEs for their preference?

A. No. PSEs converted under this MOU do not preference except as provided in Item 2 of the MOU.

18. If a PSE was converted based on the March 28 PSE Conversion MOU and they elect to return to their former assignment as provided in Item 2 of the MOU, but they were not covering a duty assignment in the former installation, do they select a residual duty assignment, and what if there are none?

A. The employee is placed in the schedule they were assigned, and in the appropriate career category based on that schedule as provided in Item 2 of the MOU.

19. How long do we allow a converted PSE to decide on whether or not to return to the former assignment?

A. Management will canvas PSE converted under the March 28 MOU. The PSE must indicate a preference when canvased.

20. A current PSE schedule is different than a residual position in the same installation - do we create an additional position for placement of the PSE or can the PSE be placed into the residual position containing the different schedule?


21. Per Section 5.11 of the MS-47 a local APWU representative may observe in the development of the staffing package. Is the representative on the clock?

A. One designated union official may be on “steward time” to observe development of the staffing package.

22. Can PSEs be converted to career in any other bargaining unit jobs e.g. Group Leader Custodial, or Building Maintenance Custodian?

A. No

23. Will Maintenance PSEs in small offices who worked non-custodial related hours in excess of the MS-47 earned hours for the office(s) they were assigned have those non-custodial hours included in their schedule?

A. No.

24. Do current career employees have the right to bid on residual vacancies and schedules the PSEs are initially given upon PSE conversion to career IAW this MOU prior to the PSE conversions?

A. No.

25. Can a newly converted PSE who was not covering a residual vacancy and was working hours and non-scheduled days not matching a vacant residual duty assignment be made Unassigned Regular (UAR) and scheduled for the hours and days off they were actually working as a PSE?

A. Yes

26. Regarding item 6 of the July 9, 2014 MOU, when determining the LDC 38 work hours to be compared to Line H on the authorized PS 4852, is there are agreed upon report to use?

A. The LDC 38 work hours can be shown by whichever report, or combination of reports, will be provide the best evidence. The end of FY LDC 38 work hours used must reflect the actual custodial work performed that is included in the Line H total. In other words, only custodial work identified in the staffing package and reflected on the Line H annual time will be used as the comparison. Work hours that do not reflect custodial work, improperly coded work or custodial work not included in Line H will be subtracted or ignored for the purposes of the LDC 38 end of FY comparison.

27. Regarding question #13 above. Will all issues go through the ADR process if unable to be resolved locally?

A. Only issues related to the PSE conversions are expected to be resolved through the ADR process.

28. Can you provide further clarification of question #1 above?

A. Regarding question #1 above. For further clarification, if a PSE is converted and placed in a previously existing (on the PAR) duty assignment which they were “covering”, they are assigned to that duty assignment and it is not available for posting and bidding except in accordance with Article 38 (Example 38.4.A.4). Where a PSE was not covering (working in) a specific duty assignment they may become an Unassigned Regular, and be given the schedule they were actually working. Immediately (if addressed in the LMOU, the next posting cycle, otherwise 14 days) after the PSE’s have been converted per this MOU, all existing vacant and residual PS-4 Laborer Custodial duty assignments will be posted for all eligible employees within the occupational group within the bid cluster and filled by PAR. Current employees and newly converted former PSE employees will all have the opportunity to PAR. Any remaining Unassigned Regulars may be assigned IAW 38.5.A.8.

August 6, 2014

sraymerTypewritten TextNote: APWU Maintenance Division concursSteve Raymer, Director8/6/2014

sraymerTypewritten Text

MS-47 Maintenance MOU Questions

1. Are PSE conversions to newly created positions that will match current PSE schedules that exceed the current authorized custodian staffing considered UAR positions? If they are considered valid, full time regular or part time regular placements that are part of current MS-47 staffing, do the newly created positions need to posted to the installation per the contract?

A. PSEs should be considered as assigned to the position they are converted into. These jobs are not to be posted for bid except in accordance with Article 38. They are considered “filled” by the PSE that was converted.

2. Does this MOU eliminate the need for conversions based on District and/or Installation seniority registers for the purpose of converting PSE custodians on the rolls prior to the signing of the MOU?

A. Conversions that have occurred and resulted in a scheduled reporting date (award) should be completed. Further conversions as required by the March 28 MOU up to October 31 are no longer required and remaining PSEs will be converted IAW the July 9, MOU Re: MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and the Maintenance Craft PSE Conversions. Per item 4 of the July 9 MOU, the remainder of the March 28, MOU including provisions for career conversion remain in effect. Also see answer 12 below.

3. If there are more residual positions, FTR/PTR, then there are PSE custodians in an installation, will the remaining residual positions be filled by in-service registers and other means per the JCIM (Item 7B forward)? Must they be held pending reversion or can the position be reverted if these positions are not authorized under the current MS-47?

A. Remaining residual vacancies may be filled IAW Article 38 and the pecking order established in the JCAM and the March 28, Maintenance PSE Conversion MOU, or may be reverted or held pending reversion IAW Article 38 or the MOU Re: MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and the Maintenance Craft PSE Conversions.

4. If a position is held pending reversion, is there a requirement to cover this position with a PSE hire as long as there is room within the cap? If there is no room within the cap, what other options are permitted under the MOU?

A. When a position held pending reversion remains required as part of the current staffing package it may be covered with a PSE if there is room in the cap. (See MOU #11) If there is no room within the PSE cap to cover a required position the position should be filled IAW Article 38, JCIM and applicable MOU’s.

5. The MOU indicates PSEs converted to regular will have the option to return to their former installation/position, if the position is still available. Would the starting point for these reviews be conversions done on or after March 20, 2014?

A. Yes

6. The Area has two Districts that provided the required local notification to the APWU for excessing to the needs of the section based on recent WHEP’s. This occurred prior to July 9, 2014. Higher level impacted occupational codes, including MOS clerks, were to be offered lower level residual custodian positions in these offices. Will we be continuing with the excessing within the installation and within the craft and holding residual positions for the excessing? How will the Districts be handling the PSE custodian conversions in these installations if excessing is to continue within the installation? Would the PSE’s be converted to UAR schedules until the excessing is completed?

A. This should not impact plans to excess other occupational groups except by reducing the number of available custodial vacancies.

7. If an installation is under the MS-47 TL-3 authorized staffing and there are residual positions that exceed that authorized staffing, does Item 11 of the MOU give the installation the ability to revert these positions as long as the reversion occurs within 120 days of the signing of the MOU?

A. Remaining residual vacancies that are in excess of the required staffing may be reverted. See item 11 of the MOU.

8. By “in place” conversions, this means there will be no preferencing by seniority for residual positions within an installation correct?

A. There will be no seniority consideration for different assignments as a result of the conversion. Subsequent bidding will be IAW the posting and filling of positions per Article 38.

9. How are we to handle a custodian PSE that does not have a regular schedule for conversion purposes?

A. The parties will need to make that determination locally. PSE’s should be covering duty assignments.

10. If the Custodian PSE schedule includes work in more than one installation with no more than 30 minutes of unpaid travel time per the Maintenance MOU for insourced work, is it a local determination for assignment of the position for the purpose of the MS-47? And how will that be credited for the 90% threshold when the installations are moved to the new model?

A. Conversion to career does not necessarily impact these assignments. The work hours will be reported as agreed to by the parties per item 6 in the MOUI.

11. Are Custodian PSE’s allowed to decline the “in place” conversions?

A. No

12. Under Item 2, any PSE who “has made a selection of a duty assignment for conversion”, would this include preferencing selections that had been made but not yet finalized by HQ’s through the due diligence process and so not yet communicated to the employee?

A. Employees who have already been assigned and reporting, or scheduled or expected to report, may exercise their right under item 2.

13. Will disputes that arise over this MOU continue to go through the ADR process currently in place if a local solution cannot be reached?

A. Yes 14. Are PSEs in the "1500" offices that were insourced to be included in the conversion to career?

A. Yes

15. Are the PS Form 4852 Line H calculations outlined in Item 6 of the MOU in effect for FY 2014?

A. Calculations for Line H should be prorated from July 9 through the end of FY 2014.

16. Does the term “in-place” mean “installation” or actual duty assignment/schedule the PSE is working?


sraymerHighlight

17. If we have residuals for placement of the PSEs in the installation, do we canvas the PSEs for their preference?

A. No. PSEs converted under this MOU do not preference except as provided in Item 2 of the MOU.

18. If a PSE was converted based on the March 28 PSE Conversion MOU and they elect to return to their former assignment as provided in Item 2 of the MOU, but they were not covering a duty assignment in the former installation, do they select a residual duty assignment, and what if there are none?

A. The employee is placed in the schedule they were assigned, and in the appropriate career category based on that schedule as provided in Item 2 of the MOU.

19. How long do we allow a converted PSE to decide on whether or not to return to the former assignment?

A. Management will canvas PSE converted under the March 28 MOU. The PSE must indicate a preference when canvased.

20. A current PSE schedule is different than a residual position in the same installation - do we create an additional position for placement of the PSE or can the PSE be placed into the residual position containing the different schedule?


21. Per Section 5.11 of the MS-47 a local APWU representative may observe in the development of the staffing package. Is the representative on the clock?

A. One designated union official may be on “steward time” to observe development of the staffing package.

22. Can PSEs be converted to career in any other bargaining unit jobs e.g. Group Leader Custodial, or Building Maintenance Custodian?

A. No

23. Will Maintenance PSEs in small offices who worked non-custodial related hours in excess of the MS-47 earned hours for the office(s) they were assigned have those non-custodial hours included in their schedule?

A. No.

24. Do current career employees have the right to bid on residual vacancies and schedules the PSEs are initially given upon PSE conversion to career IAW this MOU prior to the PSE conversions?

A. No.

25. Can a newly converted PSE who was not covering a residual vacancy and was working hours and non-scheduled days not matching a vacant residual duty assignment be made Unassigned Regular (UAR) and scheduled for the hours and days off they were actually working as a PSE?

A. Yes

26. Regarding item 6 of the July 9, 2014 MOU, when determining the LDC 38 work hours to be compared to Line H on the authorized PS 4852, is there are agreed upon report to use?

A. The LDC 38 work hours can be shown by whichever report, or combination of reports, will be provide the best evidence. The end of FY LDC 38 work hours used must reflect

sraymerHighlight

sraymerHighlight

the actual custodial work performed that is included in the Line H total. In other words, only custodial work identified in the staffing package and reflected on the Line H annual time will be used as the comparison. Work hours that do not reflect custodial work, improperly coded work or custodial work not included in Line H will be subtracted or ignored for the purposes of the LDC 38 end of FY comparison.

27. Regarding question #13 above. Will all issues go through the ADR process if unable to be resolved locally?

A. Only issues related to the PSE conversions are expected to be resolved through the ADR process.

28. Can you provide further clarification of question #1 above?

A. Regarding question #1 above. For further clarification, if a PSE is converted and placed in a previously existing (on the PAR) duty assignment which they were “covering”, they are assigned to that duty assignment and it is not available for posting and bidding except in accordance with Article 38 (Example 38.4.A.4). Where a PSE was not covering (working in) a specific duty assignment they may become an Unassigned Regular, and be given the schedule they were actually working. Immediately (if addressed in the LMOU, the next posting cycle, otherwise 14 days) after the PSE’s have been converted per this MOU, all existing vacant and residual PS-4 Laborer Custodial duty assignments will be posted for all eligible employees within the occupational group within the bid cluster and filled by PAR. Current employees and newly converted former PSE employees will all have the opportunity to PAR. Any remaining Unassigned Regulars may be assigned IAW 38.5.A.8.

August 6, 2014

sraymerHighlight

sraymerHighlight

sraymerHighlight

sraymerHighlight

Location:_Room 42 Local Equip #:_Air AD2 Make: Pneumatic Model: AD300Serial #: 0008-TR134384RST Tank Capacity: na Pressure psig: 150 HP: unkRefrigerant type: R22 Pounds 15 lbsLocation:_Room 42 Local Equip #:_Air AD1 Make: Pheumatic Model: AD600 Serial #: CA1750910 Tank Capacity: n/a Pressure psig: 188 HP: unkRefrigerant type: R22 Pounds 15 lbs

Miscellaneous - Air CompressorsAir Compressors

Please Post

Please Post

American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

Idowu Balogun, Assist. Dir. A Steven G. Raymer, Director Terry B. Martinez, Assist. Dir. B

This February 4, 2016 Step 4 settlement (Q10T-4Q-C 16070841) is intended to put to rest an issue that comes up at times, usually from management types that are new to labor relations issues or just like to engage in games of gotcha.

Custodians were always entitled to higher level pay for operating motorized powered industrial equipment, driving, etc. When the entire craft was upgraded in 2008 a concern was raised about old step 4 settlements that made a specific reference to a job title and pay grade. An example is case H1T-5H-C 29378 which stated that:

Lower level employees performing any duties requiring an SF-46 will be paid at PS-4 rate of pay.

Custodians occupied lower levels in 1985 when that step 4 was signed. Along with the old PS-3 pay grade assignments, the postal license called an SF-46 is also old news. There are other types of step 4s in this, including the one from Whitewater, WI that paid the PS-3 custodian at the PS-5 rate (2 pay levels higher) for transporting mail.

Unfortunately, a District in Missouri decided they would try to underpay a custodian for performing work requiring level 4 pay. Local management was insistent so the case was elevated to the headquarters level where the parties did not have a disagreement. The attached step 4 memorializes that higher level pay must still be made and it always has been that way. Along with the new agreement, some of the prior steps 4s are provided as examples.

Everyone deserves proper payment for the work they perform. Please remind custodians who drive vehicles or operate PIV that they are entitled to higher level.

Steven G. Raymer National Director

Idowu Balogun Terry B. Martinez Assistant Director ‘A’ Assistant Director ‘B’

PO1L~.

1i~j4.....I

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICELtbo R&abonsDepartm.nt

475 LEnfan~ Plazz, ~Washington,DC 20260-4100

On November 29, 1988, we met to discuss the above—captionedgrievance at the fourth step of our contractual grievanceprocedure.

The issue in this grievance is whether Level 3 Custodiansshould be paid higher level pay when operating a mark—lift.

After reviewing this matter, we mutually agreed that nonational interpretive issue is fairly presented in this case.However, we further agreed that lower level employeesperforming any duties requiring an OF—346 will be paid atP5—4 rate of pay (Pre—Arb Settlement Attached)

Accordingly, we agreed to settle this case.

Please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter as

your acknowledgment of agreement-tosettle this case.

Time limits were extended by mutual consent.

Sincerely,

H 1~~UGreJL~Grievance & Arbitration

Division

Ji~j~~tCtaL~Richard wevodauDirectorMaintenance Craft DivisionAmerican Postal Workers

Union, AFL—CIO

/

-~

Mr. Richard I. WevodauDirectorMaintenance Craft DivisionAmerican Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO1300 L Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20005—4107

Dear Mr. Wevodau:

December 5, 1988

Re: Class ActionMilwaukee, WI 53203114T—4J—C 28598

S~CT~QN ___________

UNITED STATES POSTM. SERVICE ________47$ ‘~,1nf ant Pi&ZL SW ~f41~PJJA~v4’~

Was2~qtcn, OC2O~O ~ Ø~,

at~~

I~,Mr. Gerald AndersonAssistant DirectorClerk Craft DivisionAmerican Postal. Workers

(Tnion, AFL-CIO817 14th Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20005—3399

Re: Class ActionWhitewater, WI 5319084C-4J—C 11777

:~ Dear Mr. Anderson:

On several occasions, th~~~_r~c!ntbeing July 29, 1986, wemet to discuss the ~step of our contractual grievance procedure.

The issue itt this grievance is whether under thecircumstances of this case, the Level 3 Custodial—Laborerat Whitewater, Wiscon~jn is entitled to higher level pay fortransporting mail between Whitewater and Elkhorn.

During our discussion, we mutually agreed that the fo1lowir~constitutesfull and final settlement of this case:

1. Laborer—Custodial 5. 0. Reth shall becompensated at the t~eve1 5 pay rate fortransporting mail between Whitewater and~lkhorrt.

2. The back pay is limited to the 14—day periodpreceding 11—12—85 (date of the Step 1.answer).

Please sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter asyour acknowledgment of agreement to settle this case.

sraymerLine

sraymerTypewritten TextNote that higher level pay is two (2) levels higher than PS-3

sraymerTypewritten Text

14:. Grald Anderson 2

Time limits were extended by mutual consent.

Sincerely,

_________ Z~ 4s~d~

Muriel A. Aikens Gera d AndersonLabor Relations Department Assistant Direct

Clerk Craft DivisionAmerican Postal Workers

Union, AFL—CIO

.

Generators EmergencyLocation:Make:KW: 3Location:Make:_______________KW:

Motors Greater than 5 HPLocation:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Location:

HP:Model:

Serial #: Equipment Served:Equipment # Make:

Model:Serial #: Equipment Served:

Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:


Equipment # Make:

UL215TTES8006AFEquipment # unk Model:Serial #: unk

DaytonEquipment Served: dust collector for carpenter shop unk

Roof Make:

Electric - PhoenixDiesel

Model: Serial #: KVA:

Volts: Phase:

Outside Mechanical Room

Volts: Phase:Natural Gas / Gasolne / Diesel (Circle One)

Model: Serial #: KVA:

Kohler 150REOZJB 2075024 200160

ERS - HEATERS

Fire Dampers:Workroom Near Column G7

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom Near Column G9 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom near Column H10 Make: Duct Size:


Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom near Column G13 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over RCS #2 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over F/G isle Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over DBCS G7 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over CIOSS D10 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseMake: Duct Size:

Activation Device:Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device:

HVAC

Room # / Location: Equip #:

Model #: Serial #:Room # / Location: Equip #:

Model #: Serial #:

Model #: Serial #:Duct Size:Room # / Location: Equip #: Make:

Room # / Location: Equip #:Model #: Serial #:





Model #: Serial #:




Room # / Location: Equip #: Make: Duct Size:Model #: Serial #:

Room # / Location: Equip #: Make: Duct Size:Model #: Serial #: Activation Device:
















Model #: Serial #: Activation Device:Room # / Location: Equip #: Make: Duct Size:

Model #: Serial #: Activation Device:

ERS - HEATERSHVAC

HeatersRoom # / Location Rm 61 J Equip #: unk Make: Dravo Hastings Model: unk

Serial #: unk Linear Feet: n/a CFM: unkElec. Base Board (Yes / No) No Coil Surface Area unk Sq Ft.Elec. In Duct (Yes / No) No BTU/Hr. n/a Motor HP n/a eam Pressure: n/aGas Fired (Yes / No) Yes BTU/Hr. unk Motor HP unk eam Pressure: n/a

Room # / Location Rm 61 J Equip #: unk Make: Dayton Model: unkSerial #: unk Linear Feet: n/a CFM: unkElec. Base Board (Yes / No) No Coil Surface Area unk Sq Ft.Elec. In Duct (Yes / No) no BTU/Hr. n/a Motor HP n/s eam Pressure: n/aGas Fired (Yes / No) Yes BTU/Hr. unk Motor HP unk eam Pressure: n/a

Steam or Hot Water (Circle One)

ePropeller/Exhaust/Centrifical Fans:Location CW Location Equip # Type Make

(wall mount / Exhaust fan)Column D7 n/a Propeller - Wall MountColumn E7 n/a Propeller - Wall MountColumn N7 n/a Propeller - Wall MountColumn N6 n/a Propeller - Wall Mount

HVAC Fans

ERS - HEATERS

Fire Dampers:Workroom Near Column G7

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom Near Column G9 Make: Duct Size:



Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom near Column G13 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over RCS #2 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over F/G isle Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over DBCS G7 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseWorkroom over CIOSS D10 Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device: thermal fuseMake: Duct Size:

Activation Device:Make: Duct Size:

Activation Device:

HVAC



Model #: Serial #:

Model #: Serial #:Duct Size:Room # / Location: Equip #: Make:






Model #: Serial #:




Room # / Location: Equip #: Make: Duct Size:Model #: Serial #:

















Model #: Serial #: Activation Device:Room # / Location: Equip #: Make: Duct Size:

Model #: Serial #: Activation Device:

ERS - HEATERSHVAC

HeatersRoom # / Location Rm 61 J Equip #: unk Make: Dravo Hastings Model: unk

Serial #: unk Linear Feet: n/a CFM: unkElec. Base Board (Yes / No) No Coil Surface Area unk Sq Ft.Elec. In Duct (Yes / No) No BTU/Hr. n/a Motor HP n/a eam Pressure: n/aGas Fired (Yes / No) Yes BTU/Hr. unk Motor HP unk eam Pressure: n/a

Room # / Location Rm 61 J Equip #: unk Make: Dayton Model: unkSerial #: unk Linear Feet: n/a CFM: unkElec. Base Board (Yes / No) No Coil Surface Area unk Sq Ft.Elec. In Duct (Yes / No) no BTU/Hr. n/a Motor HP n/s eam Pressure: n/aGas Fired (Yes / No) Yes BTU/Hr. unk Motor HP unk eam Pressure: n/a

Steam or Hot Water (Circle One)

ChillersRoom # / Location 1 YTH1H3E3-CTFS

YDAM873201 HP: 123 lbs

Room # / Location 2 23XRV4242NRVAA52809Q1950 HP: R-134A 750 lbs

Room # / Location 3 23XRV4242NRVAA52809Q1951 HP: R-134A 750 lbs

Cooling Tower:

HP:

HP:

Boiler:

HP: CFM

Pounds:

CentrifugalPounds:

Tonnage: 425Room 71 Equip #: Make: Carrier Model:

Serial #: n/a Refrigerant type:Room 71 Equip #: Make: Carrier Model:

Tonnage: 425CentrifugalSerial #: n/a Refrigerant type:

Serial #: 50 Refrigerant type: Pounds:Tonnage: Centrifugal

HVACCHILLERS - BOILERS - COOLING T0WERS

Room 71 Equip #: Make: York Model:

Baltimore AirModel #: 2423C Serial #: 83-6320M Tonnage: 400

Room # / Location: Outside BEM Shop Equip #: 1 Make:unk

Number of Cells: 1 Number of Fans: 1Baltimore Air

Model #: 2423C Serial #: unk Tonnage: 400Room # / Location: Outside BEM Shop Equip #: 2 Make:

unkNumber of Cells: 1 Number of Fans: 1

Model #: Serial #: BTU/Hr:Room # / Location: none Equip #: Make:

Hot Wtr/STM (Circle One) Fuel: Gas / Oil (Circle Appropriate One(s)) Steam lbs:

CW_ROOM_ID CW_AREACW_PROJ_ID4664 576 784256 518 784760 595 784265 518 784484 542 78

ROOMNAME STATUS SPACETYPFLOORTY1 EMPLOYEE PARKING GATE 11 TO SOUTH FENCE A 141 MAIN ENTRANCE A 1 31 RETENTION POND SOUTHWEST A 62 4210 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT A 62 4100 TECH SUPPORT NETWORK A 2 8

FLIGHTNUINCANLIG FLUOLIGHFIXTUR CREATE_DATE CREATE_UMOD_DATMOD_USE26-Sep-14 GXMYXB 14-Apr-15 YTXSJ0

6 11-Sep-14 YNFHK0 14-Apr-15 YTXSJ01 3-Oct-14 GXMYXB

1 11-Sep-14 YNFHK06 16-Sep-14 BNWGQ0 14-Apr-15 YTXSJ0

MSTATUS VACANT EXT_HEDGABOVE10FTARGET_FCW_BUILDFLIGHTNOFIXTURENLIGHTNOTCOMPLET N 1 1017COMPLET N N 3 1017 16633COMPLET N N 0 1017 20209COMPLET N N 0 1017 16677COMPLET N N 3 1017 17382

TL 5 and MS 1 STAFFING

Steve Raymer, Division Director Idowu Balogun, Assistant “A”

Terry B. Martinez, Assistant “B”

TL 5 and MS 1 Manuals

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE AND THE

AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO

Re: MS-47 TL-5 Implementation and Maintenance Craft PSE Conversions

The parties acknowledge their commitment to the orderly implementation of the MS-47 TL-5 upon release. The parties accordingly agree to the following understandings and provisions;

1) The United States Postal Service (USPS) and the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) jointly agree to the MS-47 TL-5 dated June 27, 2014 as written. A copy of that document is Attachment A to this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

The following Maintenance Management Order(s) (MMO), copies of which are Attachments B and C to this MOU, respectively, are accepted as written: .

Draft MMO mm14001af (MM0-001-14) Team Cleaning Tools and Equipment for Facility Custodial Cleaning Draft MMO mm14003ae (MM0-003-14) Housekeeping Inspection Techniques

The MS-47 TL-5 and the above referenced MMOs represent the agreed upon changes resulting from Article 19 discussions between the parties.

2) Except for those employees permitted to make a different choice by this paragraph, the USPS will convert "in-place" all current Maintenance Craft Postal Support Employees (PSEs) to career status, either to full-time regulars (FTRs) or part-time regulars (PTRs), consistent with the duty assignment the PSE currently works. These conversions will take place as soon as reasonably possible, but no later than within 30 days after the signing of this agreement. Any Maintenance PSE who has been converted prior to the date of this MOU or has made a selection of a duty assignment for conversion will have the choice of remaining in their present location and duty assignment or returning to the duty assignment they covered immediately prior to their conversion provided that duty assignment has not already been filled in accordance with Article 38. An employee who returns to a former installation under the terms of this paragraph will have the career status (FTR or PTR) they would have received had they been converted "in-place" as described herein and will receive seniority credit as if they had not left the former installation.

3) The complete conversion of all Maintenance Craft PSEs to career status in the Maintenance Craft pursuant to this MOU fully resolves all disputes at all levels regarding Maintenance Craft PSE cap violations in Function 3B including, but not limited to, all Maintenance examples cited in case Q10C-4Q-C 13126898 I APWU HQTG 20130201.

4) This MOU further satisfies item 3b of the Maintenance Craft - PSE Conversion to Career MOU dated March 28, 2014 and the reference therein to October 31, 2014 is moot. The remainder of that MOU and the pecking order for PSE conversion to career stated in the Conversion to Career MOU shall remain in effect and is hereby reconfirmed.

5) Maintenance Craft PSEs converted to career who have already served two full terms as a PSE will not be required to serve an additional probationary period after conversion to career.

a) This provision applies whether conversion is under this MOU or any other provision causing a PSE conversion to career. An exception to serving an additional probationary period is in the ten ( 1 0) already identified sites where converted PSEs working at those sites will not serve a probationary period regardless of whether they have completed two full terms as a PSE. A document listing those ten sites is Attachment D to this MOU. Further, any Maintenance PSE converted to career who does serve an

additional probationary period is not to be separated due to "lack of work" during their probationary period.

6) In facilities that are maintained by USPS custodians, upon the conclusion of each Postal Fiscal Year (FY), during October of the new FY, the total custodial work hours for the just completed fiscal year shown on the end of year report(s) for Labor Distribution Code (LDC) 38 (custodial work) will be compared with 90% of the custodial work hours shown on Line H of PS form 4852. The results will be provided to and discussed with the Local APWU President or designee. Falling short of 90% of the work hours shown on PS Form 4852 Line H will result in compensation for each hour short of 90% of the hours on PS Form 4852 Line H paid at the overtime rate to the custodial employees who will be identified in writing by the APWU Local Union. The APWU Local Union will determine the appropriate custodial employee(s) to compensate. In the fiscal year of the MS-47 TL-5 implementation, the period shall be prorated for the time MS-47 TL-3 PS Form 4852 was in effect and the time MS-47 TL-5 PS Form 4852 was in effect. Where staffing changes have been made during the course of the fiscal year, the final Line H hours of the PS Form 4852 to be considered for comparison at the end of the FY shall be the sum of the hours shown on each PS Form 4852 Line H prorated for the period each of the staffing packages were in effect during the FY. The 90% of Line H work hours is not intended to permit the staffing level for the individual facility (e.g. a station, branch, VMF, annex, etc.) covered by the PS Form 4852 to be below the number of employees shown on the PS Form 4852 Where a custodial duty assignment works at more than one facility, the local parties are to agree on how to apply the work hours.

a) Further in any facility where the facility has fallen short of the 90% of work hours on PS Form 4852 Line H for a FY and in the succeeding Fiscal Year comparison, the facility is again short of achieving the 90% of work hours on PS Form 4852 Line H, the payments made under this paragraph will then be equal to the difference between the custodial work hours shown on the end of year report(s) for LDC 38 and 100% of the work hours shown on PS Form 4852 Line H for that Fiscal Year. (after prorating if applicable).

b) Compensation at 100% of work hours reflected on the PS Form 4852 Line H calculation will only occur when the facility has failed to achieve the 90% threshold in successive, consecutive years but shall continue at the 100% level until the facility has achieved 90% of the work hours in a fiscal year. For subsequent failure to reach the 90% of work hours on the PS Form 4852 the process described herein repeats.

Note: PS Form 4852 Line H shall be pro-rated for any period that the facility had to suspend operations on account of an emergency, disaster or otherwise of an Act of God.

7) Installations where the MS-47 TL-5 has as yet not been implemented, the USPS may hire Maintenance Craft PSEs within the applicable cap and assign them to the hours and days off of a residual vacancy which the Service declares as a held pending reversion duty assignment. A duty assignment may be declared as held pending reversion after the Service has notified the Union of the intent to implement the MS-47 TL-5 at that facility and after an initial work loading has been completed indicating reduced custodial staffing. Until the implementation of the MS-47 TL-5 with its approved staffing package, the installation, for the purpose of applying paragraph six (6) above, Line H from MS-47 TL-3 PS Form 4852 will be used (see item 11 for placing residual vacancies existing on the signing of this MOU as held pending reversion).

8) Upon implementation of MS-47 TL-5 in a facility, duty assignments may be reverted provided the staffing level does not go below that required by MS-47 TL-5.

9) All LDC 38 work hours, career and PSE count towards PS Form 4852 Line H hours.

10) Staged implementation of MS-47 TL-5:

a) The USPS and APWU agree to implement the MS-47 TL-5 dated June 27, 2014 and its cleaning procedures at no more than 15 facilities during Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 (for purposes of this MOU only a "facility" is a single site or location which has its own PS Form 4869, PS Form 4839 and PS Form 4852). By the end of FY 2015 no more than 100 facilities shall have the MS-47 TL-5 cleaning procedures implemented. (This number 100 includes facilities, where the MS-47 TL-5 was implemented in FY 2014). The implementation in the remaining facilities shall be completed thereafter.

ibalogunHighlight

b) For purposes of this MOU no involuntary reassignments (excessing), except for actions taken under Article 12.5.C.4, may occur due to the implementation of MS-47 TL-5 at any installation.

c) The parties understand that until the Service implements MS-47 TL-5, the MS-47, TL-3 version is applicable to the facility. Outside of item 6 above, this settlement is not intended to nullify or modify any prior headquarters agreements, settlements or awards in which the 1983 MS-47 was an issue.

11) Custodial duty assignments which are vacant upon the signing of this MOU, and which are not being covered by Maintenance Craft PSEs or committed for employee transfer may be declared as held pending reversion or. reverted, if reversion is otherwise permitted under Article 38.4, within 120 days of the signing of this MOU. The work hour requirements of item 6 above must still be met. Duty assignments declared as held pending reversion under this item will be counted toward the staffing level for the facility under the MS-47 TL 3. Duty assignments declared as held pending reversion under this item may be filled by a PSE if allowed within the applicable PSE cap.

12) After the date on which this MOU is signed, a vacant custodial duty assignment in an installation which has not implemented the MS-47 TL-5 may be reverted only in accordance with Article 38 or placed in held pending reversion based on this MOU (see item 6 above) and only then provided the applicable PSE cap is not exceeded.

Patrick M. Devine Manager, Contract Administration (APWU) United States Postal Service

Date: --;1_-_q-=----'--~..~-

Steven G. Raymer Director, Maintenance o· ion American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

sraymerHighlight

Mr. Steven G. Raymer Director, Maintenance Division American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

RE: Q10T-4Q-C 14080458 APWU #: HQTT20140102 Washington, DC 20260-4100

Recently, we met to discuss the above captioned dispute at the Step 4 level of the grievance- arbitration procedure. Time limits were extended by mutual agreement.

This resolution concerns the dispute initiated by the APWU on February 11, 2014 regarding the effective date and implementation of the Transmittal Letter (TL) 5 version of the new Handbook MS-47, following the pilot testing of the revised handbook in certain locations, and the agreed-upon publication and implementation of the new Handbook MS-47 in the MOU dated July 9, 2014.

The parties agree to the following:

In a facility which has transitioned from the Handbook MS-47, TL-3 version in accordance with the parties July 9, 2014 MOU, the effective date of the Handbook MS-47, TL-5 version is:

Day 1 of the first pay period following the completion of TL-5 training for the available custodial workforce and approval of the authorized TL-5 custodial staffing package. The order in which these two items occurs is not determinative; the effective date is Day 1 of the pay period following the point in time when both items are true.

The above referenced training includes the initial classroom training. The available custodial workforce includes all custodial personnel present during the training time frame. Any absent custodial personnel will be scheduled for training as soon as possible upon return.

Upon approval, the Local APWU President or designee will be provided a copy of the approved MS-47 TL-5 staffing package. This agreement is applicable to the pro-rating required under item number 6 of the July 9, 2014 MOU. This agreement is reached on a non-precedential basis and does not impact the effective date of any other handbook(s).

Terry C. LeFevre Steven G. Raymer Labor Relations Specialist Director Contract Administration (APWU) Maintenance Division United States Postal Service American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO

September 29, 2015

lABOR RaATIONS

iiii='!J!f UNITED STIJ.TES J!iiir POSTIJ.L SERVICE

Mr. Steven G. Raymer Director, Maintenance Division American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington DC ?0005-4128

Dear Mr. Raymer:

RE: QOOT-40-C 04127113 Class Action Washington DC 20260-4100 ·

On May 5, 2004, the American Postal Workers Union inruated a dispute concerning whether the April 1, 2004 •. change to the 2001 MS-47, Housekeeping Postal Facilities, and instructions to the field eliminated certain custodial assignments in Vehicle Maintenance Facilities in violation of Article 19 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

on numerous occasions, the last being, August 31, 2004, we discussed the issue in dispute and agree that no National Interpretive Dispute Is fairly represented in this case. As a result of this docision, the parties mutually agree to the following as full resolution of this case:

In Postal Bulletin 22125, dated 04/01/2004, on page 77, the USPS notified the fteld that a change was being made to the MS-47, which would clarify cleaning responsibilities in vehicle maintenance facilities. The change revised the first sentence in item 2 under section 511d of the 2001 MS-47 to read:

"Cleaning (VMF only) No plant maintenance custodhal cleaning is authorized for the VMF workroom."

The former language read:

"Cleaning (VMF only) At VMF sites where the Garageman positio:'l is authorized, no custodial cleaning is authorized for the VMF workroom."

The above listed change was not intended to aher existing assignments of employees in Vehicle Maintenance and the Plant Maintenance Custodians. Cleaning responsibilities in Vehicle Maintenance Facilities has been outlined in documents dated, July 27, 1983; October 5, 1995; and most recently in a letter from Mr. Edward Gamsche, Manager Maintenance Policies and Programs, dated March 9, 2004. This letter stated in part,

'This language was in no way intended to change any existing policies previousiy identifying the division of maintenance responslbilitles in the VMFs and defined In the October 5, 1995, memorandum signed by the Vice President, Operations Support, and the Vice President, Engineering.

Maintenance Policies and Programs will reissue the March 9th, letter from Mr. Gamache as additional clarification to field offices on cleaning responsibilities in Vehicle Maintenance Facilities.

Additionally, the resolution in this case in no manner affects the existing dispute filed by the APWU. case# Q98C-4Q-C 02013900, concerning the 2001 revisions to Handbook MS-47, Housekeeping Postal Facilities.

4 75 L'ENFANT PLAZA SW WASHmTO'l DC 20260-4100

W#W.USI'S.COM

Time limits at this level were extended by mutual consent as it relates to the Article 15 issues involved in this dispute.

'11""! !. . J. 'M ~~ Pamela S. Molloy Labor Relations Specialist Contract Administration

Date: /2./2./IJ'f I Tl

Steven G. Raymer · Director Maintenance Di · on American Postal Workers Union, AFL·CIO

AREA MANAGERS OPERATIONS SUPPORT

SUBJEC1: VMF Cleaning Respt~nslbllftles and the Revised Mfi-47 Datad Deeember'~1; 2001

This is to dariry the uSPS policy on tJie subJect of cl~:aning res :10nslbiitiea in our Vel\iete Maintenance .Fac:ililias"(VMFsJ and :BPPiir:::afion of the ra\lfsed Handbook MS-47, HouseiCeeplng.. Postal Fac:ililfes. dtm!d 1213112001.

Specifical!)'; an Jsaue ftils arisan on .tfle m.rbject of worl

-·-· -··- -"-- ~-~·. .. ·-- -- ... ----

October 5. 1995

MANAGERS, OPERATIONS SUPPORT {AREA)

SUBJECT; Maintenance Responsibility Guidelines

The following guldennes are provided to clarify both Vehicle Maintenanoe and Plant Maintenance responsfbllltles for Vehicle Maintenance Facility (VMF} building and equipment maintenance.

A. Vehicle Maintenance has the responsibility for maintenance of:

1. Vehicle maintenance work areas: (shop floors).

2. All VMF tools and equipment related to the repair of vehicles used within the-W~ .

3. All internal combustion engines used for vehicle maintenance on all non-fixed equipment. except for propane powered tugs or forklifts. lawn ·mowers, $now removing machJnes and swee:pers mat are·useo by plant maintenanoe.

4. All non-fix~d booy··shop equipment {see B.3).

5. All non-fiXed automotive test equipment.

e. Plant Maintenance has1he responalblllty for: 1. CustodiaJ work, i.e .• swing room, rest rooms, stock rooms, offices, windows

and common areas ather than work ba~.

2. Maintenance of overhead doors. exhaust systems. lines (air, hydraulic, water), electric lights, light and lubrication reels.

·2-

3. Maintenance of building structures and equipment (aU fixed equipment which would remain if building were vacated).

4. Compressors and all lines attached.

5. Safety related equipment, i.e., fire extinguishen:oln building.

e. Eleotrical equipment using 11 o to 480 volts, except A-s.

7. Parts/storage areas and she,vinq and construction thereof ..

a. A!l building Interior and exterior painting, i.e., floors, walls, ceilings, doors, etc.

'Nhlle this Jist does not .identify every .piece of equipment that may exist at a VMF; the$e gofdeUnes represent the divis.ion of responsibirities that will work most effectively based upon past experiences. If a situation arises where the expertise to resolve a needed repair does not exlst, (i.e., floor hoist, heavy duty hydraulic equipment. etc.) contractor support may be utlrized as appropriate.

Please disseminate thiS information to the appropriate managers. These guidelines .should allow local managers·to re5oJve any uncovered Items.

(Jllj~ lu a JJ¥Jo, J .Allen Kane ~fliam 1 · . . Vice pre,ident Vica PreFi ent Operations Suppnn Engineeri

July 27., 1983

DS42DaR~amlinaontmhra7242

Maintenan·c:e ·:aesponsibil.it.y i3uf.delin~JI

Regional Directors, ,Customer SerVices Depa~tment negional nirectors, Hail Processing Department

The following gu~del1ne~ are ~rco~1ded to clarify both vehicle MaitJten~nce and Plant.Maintenance responsibilities for Vehicle Maintenanoe facilities CVMFs).

A. VM.Fe have the responsibi~ity for ~intenanee ot!

1.

2 ..

4.

s.

ve~icle·maintenance work areas (ahop floor•>•

All VMF tools and equipment related to the repair of vehicles that are ~sed within the VMP.

All internal combustion engines used for ~ehicle maintenance on all hon iised

· equipment, except. for propane powered tugs or tork lifts, lewn mowers, snow removing. a~chihes and sweepers that are used by plant :m.aintenance.

All non f!=ed.body Ghop equ1pment Caee·B~3).

All non fixed au~oaotive test equlpmen~.

a. ~lant Mai~tenance ha• the responsibility for:

l ..

a.

cuc~odlal wo~k, !.e., •wing room, rout ro~, atoc:k rooms, offices, windows and eor.at11on &2:'caas other than work baya.

Mcintenance of ove~head Oocre, exhaust ays~em. line:. {«ir, byCir.aulic, water), electric lights, light and lub:ication real••

3. Halntenance cf building •tructures and equip' ment (all fixed equipment which would ~ema1n if puilding ~ere vacated).

~· Compressors ~nd all .linoD·ett•~hed.

s. SAfety·tel~ted equ1pmeAt,·1.e., fire extinguishers in building.

6. Electrical equipment using 110 t.c 480 voitJS, except A•S.

7. Parts/storage bins and. shelving an\1 conott:\ic:t.ian thereof.

a. All building interior and exterio~ painting, i.e., floors, walla, ceiling,, a~ors, etc.

While this list ~ay not i~entify each and ever,r piece of equip~ mcnt t.lult. may exist ·~ e VMF, theao guic.\eline.s represent the division o£ responsibilities that will vork moat effectively based upon nQr.mal training and expertise. If a situation arises where the .:Xiat,.··hea.vy duty hycSraul·ic equipment, etc.) eontra~tol:'. e.upport may be utilized .as appropriate. "J:'h.e11e guidelines ehould allow local MSCa to ra•olvo any ubao~ered i*='em.• ..

,,,·__...,. ~ Eugene c. Hagburg (/issiatant·Postmaster General Delivery Services Dep•rtment · Operations Group · ccJ General Manager

Delivery D1v~aion All Region~

~.~c~tr William V. Chapp Ase1~tint Post=aster General Bn9inoe~ing and Technioal Suppart

Department Operaticna C~o~p

General Manager Maintenanc~ Manag•~nt bivieiqn All .Regions

National Dispute Resolved – Duty Assignments Restored

Deducting Floor Space (MS-47) May 25, 2012

Settlement was reached today on the dispute filed by the USPS over their ability to deduct floor space from the Building Inventory constructed pursuant to the MS-47, Postal Housekeeping, handbook (case Q06T-4Q-C 10269698).

The issue in the case is whether the Service, when properly constructing a custodial staffing package, can deduct square footage from floor space including under mail processing equipment.

The dispute arose from the field when local management presented a custodial staffing package, upon which the PS Form 4869, Building Inventory, is the foundation document from which the rest of the staffing package is built, that removed workfloor space under certain mail processing equipment from the process. Upon further investigation, it appeared this complete change in interpretation and application of the 1983 MS-47 handbook was being required by Area level management.

We investigated further and established that indeed Area level management had contrived this concept by parsing together various words and passages from the MS-47 and applying a new interpretation to the result. The APWU responded, under Article 15, with the filing of an Area level grievance. One day of hearing was held at the regional level and just before the second day the Service elevated the grievance to headquarters whereupon the Service initiated a national dispute.

The settlement resolves the specific issue stating, “The deduction of square footage of floor space, including under mail processing equipment, is not permitted in developing a Building Inventory in accordance with the current MS-47 Handbook. The Postal Service will cease deducting floor space on any PS Form 4869.”

The settlement goes on to provide the Service with 30 days to inform their representatives and to have accomplished the restoration of any deducted square feet of floor space. The settlement does not permit “new” staffing packages to be created and local management needs policing by local Unions’ to ensure the only adjustments made are in fact the restoration of the square feet of deducted space. It is important that all other entries on the inventory and the frequencies of work, etc. remain the same and that was specifically part of the headquarters bargain. There are presently grievances in the field on staffing packages and this settlement will not permit the Service to claim the aggrieved package is moot – it will only be updated pursuant to the settlement – as it is not a “new” staffing package. The settlement does provide that the local Union shall be provided with the adjusted staffing package.

National Dispute Resolved – Duty Assignments Restored

Deducting Floor Space (MS-47) May 25, 2012

The settlement goes on to provide that local management will take immediate action to add/restore any duty assignments established by the return of the deducted floor space. Such duty assignments must be posted and filled within 60 days of the settlement, which is in accordance with Article 38.4.A allowing 30 days from the establishing of the vacancy to post the job.

As remedy on the narrow matter of posting duty assignments due to the return of floor space, the initial vacancy from the posting(s) and all resultant vacancies shall be filled with career employees. The Service may not stop and revert nor may they fill any of these vacancies with PSEs.

All other issues and remedy regarding, for example, posting and filling of other duty assignments; other reasons for challenging the current staffing package; basically anything outside of the returning of the deducted floor space; which may be in grievance cases that were held pending the outcome of this case are remanded to the field for resolution or arbitration.

Steven G. Raymer Director, Maintenance Division APWU AFL-CIO

Main Entrance Doors

Fire Doors

4 Sliding

1 Swinging

Location: Stockroom

1 rollup near IPSS

Location:Location:Location:

Customer Entrance (lobby)Admin North entranceAdmin North/East Entrance

(Non Powered) #(Non Powered) #(Non Powered) #

6 Swinging2 Swinging

Miscellaneous - Doors

Type: Swinging Exit Locking Mechanism: PushBarLocation: Room 69 AMS Type: Swinging Exit Locking Mechanism:

Powered:Powered:Powered:

Other Powered Doors:2 impact doors room 27 (express)1 rollup in Tools and Parts Room 79

63 rollup dockdoors (East Dock)2 rollup doors in Battery Room1 rollup door in room 61 G 1 rollup door in room 71

PushBarLocation: Outside Fence - Battery Room Type: Swinging Exit Locking Mechanism: PushBar

22 rollup doors at VMF

Make Model Serial NumberGate #1 HySecurity 222 SS ST 016100-1326-218Gate #2 HySecurity 222 SS ST 014200-1330-441Gate #3 Pedestrian gate chained shutGate #4 Pedestrian gate Mag Lock

Equipment # Controller Information

Miscellaneous - GatesOther Comments

Room # Emergency LightsFire

ExtinguishersPull

StationsEmer Exit

SignsEye

WashPlumbed Eyewash

Valves > 2"

Valves Motor

8 2 240 144 2 148 1 149 152 3 155 156 157 172 2 1 175 179 280 4 1 1 2111 6 1 1 2112 1116 2 1 4162 3 1 2164 1175 1177 2 1 1182 2 3 1190 2 1208 3 2217 1221 1 1 1230 1238 2245 1

10 (electrical room) 1102 Custodial Closet 1

102 Supervisor Lounge 1 1105 Men's room 1

106 C 1106 Corridor 1

108 A 1109B Tour Supervisor 1110 Custodail Closet 1

113 (LDDC) 5 2 1 2113 E 1

113 Finance Supervisor 1113 Records 1

113A 2 2113B 1113C 1

115 Electrical Room 2 1116B 1

117 Phone Room 2 1119 B IT Network Cooling 1

119A 2 1 1119C (IPSS) 1 1148 In-Plant 1

154 Plant Manager's Office 4 2 3157 (Women's RR) 1

158 (Men's RR) 1160 Custodial Closet 1

160 Women's Restroom 1161 Mens's Restroom 1

187 (Post Master) 119 Customer Box Lobby 9 1 2 2

General information


ExtinguishersPull

StationsEmer Exit

SignsEye

WashPlumbed Eyewash

Valves > 2"

Valves Motor

General information

1st Floor Admin Hallway 8 2 1 81st Floor Admin Lobby Elevator 1 1 1 1

202 Elevator Room 1 1 1 1211A 1 1 2211B 1 1

221 manager's office 1223 (Women's RR) 1

224 (Men's RR) 1227 ET Office 1 1

227A 1237 Electrical Room 126A APWU Cubical 1

26B Mail Handler's Cubical 127 Express Room 6 4 1 2 22nd Floor Hallway 9 6 2 6

2nd Floor Swingroom 13 Customer Service Lobby 1

32A Drivers Lounge 2 232B Transportation Office 1 1

34 Electrical Room 136A Custodial Closet 136B Custodial Closet 136C Custodial Closet 1

37A Women's Restroom 137B Women's Restroom 137C Women's Restroom 1

38A Men's Restroom 138B Men's Restroom 138C Men's Restroom 1

39 Maint Repair 1 142 Mechanical Room 2 1 24 5

43 Locker Room 1 1 145 Electrical Shop 1 1

46 Electrical Shop upstairs 150 Expeditor Office 153 Slips & Labels 2 1 1

54 Stairwell 254 Upstairs Lockerrrom 2 1 1

58A 2 1 1 1 159 BEM Customer Lobby 8 2 2 2

59C BMEU Backroom 3 1 259C BMEU Closet 159D BMEU Storage 3

61 B 1 2 1 261 C 1 1

61 D Oil Room 1 2 1 161 E MES Office 1

61 F MMES Office 161 G 1

61 J Equipment Shop 8 3 2 561 K Machine Shop 1 1 1 1 1

61M Restroom 162 AMS Corridor 2

65 OIG 4 3 1 266 Women's RR 1

67 Men's RR 169 AMS 2 2 171 (a) 1 1 19

71 Condenser Pump Room 1 1 8


ExtinguishersPull

StationsEmer Exit

SignsEye

WashPlumbed Eyewash

Valves > 2"

Valves Motor

General information

71 Mechanical Room 3 4 1 1 2 1 30 671 Stairwell to roof 3

73 Carpenter 3 1 174A 2 1 1

75 Corridor 1 1 176B Electrical Room 5 3 1 1

80 Back Office 181 Maint Control 3 192 Women's RR 1

93 Custodial Closet 194 Men's RR 1

95 Kitchen Area 3 4 1 195 Office 1

97 Cafeteria 7 2 2 6Admin N/E Stairway 1Admin N/W Stairway 4 1 1

Battery Room 4 2 2 1 1Bob Garman's Office 1

Custodial Battery Room 1 1Dock / East 20 8 6 8

Dock / East (south) 2 1Dock / South Container Repair 2 1

Dock BMEU 2 1 1Employee Entrance Corridor 2 1 1 2

Fan Room 200 4 1 1 3 2 27 4Fan Room 201 6 1 1 3 3 26 4Fan Room 202 6 2 2 6 2 52 6Fan Room 203 3 1 1 1 1 7 1Fan Room 204 1 1 1 1 1 7 1Fan Room 205 3 1 1 1 1 11 1

IT Cage 1IT Mezz 1

Maint Supply room 1 1 1Outside Room 71 18 3

South Dock 5 2 3South Dock East Vestibule 1South Dock West Vestibule 1

VFM 115 1 1 1VMF 101 1 1 1 1VMF 110 1VMF 113 1 VMF 120 2 2 1 1 1VMF 123 1 1VMF 129 1

VMF Air Comp Room 1 12VMF Battery Room 1

VMF Custodian Room 2 2VMF Hallway 2 2 2

VMF JO3 1VMF Mech Room 2 2 1 1

VMF Outside 3 1VMF outside pump area 2

VMF outside storage area 1VMF Paint Shop 1 1 1 1VMF Tire Area 1 2 2 3

VMF Vehicle Bay 3 5 4 1 2VMF Wash bay 1 1Workroom Floor 300 62 17 44 3

Total 619 189 76 169 30 4 251 34

Power Lift Equipment Number Make Model Serial Number SpanPower Lift BL1 Skyjack SJK8-33N 90262 33ftPower Lift G1 Genie Z-30/20N Z30N09-11922 30ft

Equipment Type Equipment Number Make Model Serial number HP Other info

Sweeper unk Tennent 6400 8400-4228 unk GasCart TD4 Taylor Dunn SS5-36 108123 unk ElectricCart unk Taylor Dunn B1-125 165674 unk Electric

Miscellaneous - Vehicles/Lifts

Other Vehicles

Room # / Location: Fan Room 200 Equipment #: AH1Make/Manufacturer:Model #: CCDB63ENEC Serial #: U83J3703L CFM: unkMotor Make: Marithon Model: 284TTDC6026AA Seria 90021Filter # (Throw away): 12 Size: 24 X 24 x 2 Filter # (Throw away):

Room # / Location: Fan Room 200 Equipment #: AH2Make/Manufacturer:Model #: CCDB35ENEC Serial #: U83J37032 CFM: unkMotor Make: Marathon Mode l#: 256TTDC602AA Seria 90083Filter # (Throw away): 10 Size: 24 X 24 x 2 Filter # (Throw away):

Room # / Location: Fan Room 200 Equipment #: AH3Make/Manufacturer:Model #: CCD841KNEC Serial #: U83J3703L CFM: unkMotor Make: Marathon Model #: 254TTDC6026AA Seria 90052Filter # (Throw away): 12 Size: 24 X 24 x 2 Filter # (Throw away):

Room # / Location: Fan Room 200 Equipment #: AH4Make/Manufacturer:

HVAC - Air Handler

HVAC - Air Handler

Trane

HP: 2512 Size: 24 x 24 x 12

Trane

HP: 1510 Size: 24 x 24 x 12

Trane

HP: 2012 Size: 24 x 24 x 12

Trane

15Size:

15Size:

15Size:

25Size:

30Size:

25Size:

25Size: 24 x 24 x 12

25Size: 24 x 24 x 12

20Size: 24 x 24 x 12

15Size: 24 x 24 x 12

20Size: 24 x 24 x 12

7.5Size: 24 x 24 x 12

15Size: 24 x 24 x 12

15Size: 24 x 24 x 12

15Size: 24 x 24 x 12

20Size: 24 x 24 x 12

(Plant)(VMF)

PackerPackerPacker

Lawn and Garden

Size: unk Equip #: unkMake: unk/ Stall 65 Model: unk Serial #: unk Size: unk Equip #: unk

Walking Snow Blowers: Other:Mowers Edgers:

Size:

Baler Make: none Model: Serial #:Make: unk / Stall 64 Model: unk Serial #: unk

Miscellaneous - OtherSq. Ft. of roof material: 467,764 # Roof Drains 103 # Roof Vents 65Sq. Ft. of roof material: 24,320 # Roof Drains 12 # Roof Vents 18

Size:

Make: Model: Serial #:

Other Items not included on formsPassenger Elevator (Motor Make:Gould, Part: 6-350176-40, HP: 30,)Lift (near the cooling towers used to bring items up to the roof.) Model # SERI ES V, Serial #: 11719, Weight Cap 2000lbsEquipment Scale on BMEU Dock

Location/Rm #Equipment Roof MaterDrain Qty Vent QtyRoof, Plant ?? 467,764 103 65Roof, VMF ?? 24,320 12 18

Make Model Serial Size Equip#N/A Baler noneSouth Dock Packer unk / Stall 64 unk unk unk unkSouth Dock Packer unk/ Stall 65 unk unk unk unk??? Packer

1 Equip #: odel: LevelerHP: Powered

2 Equip #: odel: LiftHP: Powered

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Serial #: unk Weight Capacity: unk

Miscellaneous - Dock (Sample)Location: East Dock 1 Make: unk

Dock Boards (Loading Ramps)

Serial #: unk Weight Capacity: unkLocation: East Dock 4 Make: unk

Miscellaneous - Dock (Sample)30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

Miscellaneous - Dock (Sample)59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

Location CW Location Equip# Make Model Serial1 East Dock E DOCK DAY 1 1 Leveler UNK2 East Dock E DOCK DAY 1 4 Lift UNK

Valve, Regulating (Steam Valves at pressure reduction stations)

1 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Cond #1 Make: Armstrong Model: 030180T3E286TCSerial#: 130UT09 1005200750 HP: 30 GPM: nt Served: cooling system

Centrifugal (Yes) Fire Pump Combustion (No)Fuel Type: n/a Hot Water (No) Condensate (No) Fire Pump, Electrical (No) Vacuum (No)Steam (No) Steam lbs: n/a

2 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Cond #2 Make: Armstrong Model: 030160T3E286TCSerial#: 130UT09 1005760757 HP: 30 GPM: nt Served: cooling system


3 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Cond #3 Make: Armstrong Model: 030180T3E286TCSerial#: 09DEZ09 1000305082 HP: 30 GPM: nt Served: cooling system


4 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Cond #4 Make: Armstrong Model: 030160T3E286TCSerial#: 09DEZ091 000305… HP: 30 GPM: nt Served: cooling system


5 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Heat Transfer Make: Balder Model: 16L058N750H2Serial#: HP: GPM: nt Served:


6 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Chilled Water #1Make: Max Guard Model: AC 364THDS4040ANSerial#: CMTRS-445068-00 HP: 60 GPM: unk nt Served: Chilled Water Loop


7 Location: Room 71 (Chiller Room)Equip #: Chilled Water #2Make: Max Guard Model: AC 364THDS4040ANSerial#: CMTRS-445068-00 HP: 60 GPM: unk nt Served: Chilled Water Loop


8 Location: Room 71 Chiller Room)Equip #: Chilled Water #3Make: Max Guard Model: AC 364THDS4040ANSerial#: CMTRS-445068-00 HP: 60 GPM: unk nt Served: Chilled Water Loop


9 Location: Room 71 Chiller Room)Equip #: Booster #1 Make: US Electric Model: UTF4 TESerial#: F253AU11U259R044F HP: 10 GPM: unk nt Served: Chiller # 1


10 Location: Room 71 Chiller Room)Equip #: Booster #2 Make: US Electric Model: UTF4 TESerial#: F253AU11U259R044F HP: 10 GPM: nt Served: Chiller #2


11 Location: Room 71 Chiller Room)Equip #: Booster #3 Make: Baldor Model: JPM2333TSerial#: 07H301W666 HP: 15 GPM: unk nt Served: Chiller #3


12 Location: VMF Room 127 Equip #: LP1 Make: Weaver Model: 62Serial#: 5AE-01 HP: 7.5 GPM: unk nt Served: Oil Pump 1


PlumbingSize: Pressure: unk

Pressure:Location:Location: Size:

Location: Type:Steam Trap (type=Thermostatic, float, inverted bucket, and/or impulse trap)

Location: Type:

Pumps (Centrifugal, Fire Pump Electric, Fire Pump Combustion)

Plumbing13 Location: VMF Room 127 Equip #: LP2 Make: Weaver Model: 62Serial#: 5AE-02 HP: 7.5 GPM: unk nt Served: Oil Pump 2


14 Location: Outside Room 71 Equip #: Sweep 1 Make: Leeson Model: C6T34FC41CSerial#: unk HP: 3 GPM: unk nt Served: Cooling Tower 1


15 Location: Outside Room 71 Equip #: Sweep 2 Make: Leeson Model: C6T34FC41CSerial#: unk HP: 3 GPM: unk nt Served: Cooling Tower 2


HP:Fire Pump Combustion (Y/N)

HP:Fire Pump Combustion (Y/N)

Model:

Condensate (Y/N) Fire Pump, Electrical (Y/N) Vacuum (Y/N) Steam (Y/N) Steam lbs:

Location: Equip #: Make:

Equip #: Make:

Steam lbs:

Model:

Serial#: GPM: Equipment Served: Centrifugal (Y/N) Fuel Type: Hot Water (Y/N)

Location:Serial#: GPM: Equipment Served:

Centrifugal (Y/N) Fuel Type: Hot Water (Y/N) Condensate (Y/N) Fire Pump, Electrical (Y/N) Vacuum (Y/N) Steam (Y/N)

Report of Hazard, Unsafe Condition or Practice

Hazard Control Number (Assigned by Safety Officer)

____ ____ ____ ____ ____

I. EMPLOYEE’S ACTIONArea (Specify Work Location)

Describe hazard, unsafe condition or practice. Recommended corrective action.

EmployeePrint and Sign Date and Tour

II. SUPERVISOR’S ACTIONRecommend or describe action taken to eliminate the hazard, unsafe condition or practice. (If corrective action has been taken, indicate the date of abatement.)

SupervisorPrint and Sign Date

III. APPROVING OFFICIAL’S ACTION (Check One and Complete)

The following corrective action was taken to eliminate the hazard, unsafe condition or practice (Indicate date of abatement):

A work order has been submitted to the manager, plant maintenence to effect the following change:

There are no reasonable grounds to determine such a hazard exists. This decision is based upon:

Approving Official

Print and Sign Date Date Employee Notified

IV. MAINTENANCE ACTION (Complete if Necessary)

Maintenance Supervisor

Print and Sign Date Date Hazard Abated

PS Form 1767, June 2014 PSN 7530-01-000-9422 WHITE – Local Safety Office (After Abatement)YELLOW – Approving Official

PINK – Local Safety Official (Initial Notice)BLUE – Employee

INSTRUCTIONS

I. EMPLOYEE (Print, sign, and date.)

a. Complete section I. and file it with your immediate supervisor.

b. If you desire anonymity, complete section I. (including your name) and file the report with the safety Office, Safety personnel will immediately return the form to your supervisor for necessary action, and will delete your name from the form to ensure your anonymity.

II. SUPERVISOR (Print, sign, and date.)

a. Investigate the alleged hazard during the same tour of duty in which the report was received.

b. Abate the hazard if it is within the scope of your authority to do so.

c. Record the action taken to eliminate the hazard or record recommendation for corrective action is section II. and sign your name.

d. Forward the original and yellow copy to your immediate supervisor (approving official); send the pink copy to the Safety Office; and give the employee the remaining blue copy as a receipt. It is your responsibility to monitor the status of the report, at all times, until the hazard is abated.

III. APPROVING OFFICIAL (Print, sign, and date.)

a. Initiate action to eliminate or minimize the hazard. If this results in the submission of a work order, attach the original of this form, and forward through channels, to the manager, Plant Maintenance.

b. If you determine that there are no reasonable grounds to believe a hazard exists, notify the employee in writing within 15 calendar days. Safety personnel will assist you in this determination when requested.

c. If the hazard was abated by the first line supervisor or when it has been abated through your actions, notify the employee in writing, and send the original of this form to the Safety Office.

IV. MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR (Print, sign, and date.)

When the work order has been completed, sign, date, and return the original of this form to the approving official who will then forward it to the Safety Office.

PS Form 1767, June 2014 (Reverse)

Cover page July 9 2014 MOU~MS-47 Q & ACustodian higher level noticeCustodial Work at VMF'sSpace Case -- settlement and explanationMS-47 TL-5 Effective DateAir Compressors Sample of Inventory Eletric Sample of Inventory Heater Sample of InventoryHVAC Fans Sample Inventory .HVAC Heater Sample of Inventory .HVAC Chiller Sample of Inventory Misc Doors Sample of Inventory Misc Gates Sample of Inventory Misc General info Sample of Inventory Misc Vehicle Lift Sample of InventoryMisc Air Handler Sample of Phoenix Inventory ...Not AllMisc Other Sample of Inventory Misc Sample of Inventory Pluming Sample of Inventory New PS Form1767 Fillable

Text1: Text2: Text3: Text4:

Steve Raymer, Division Director Idowu Balogun, Assistant ... · Subject: RE: Revised - Expanded Q &...

Documents

Transcript of Steve Raymer, Division Director Idowu Balogun, Assistant ... · Subject: RE: Revised - Expanded Q &...