Stephanie Jilcott, Scott Ickes, Alice Ammerman, Heidi Lutjens, Jennifer Myhre
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Stephanie Jilcott, Scott Ickes, Alice Ammerman, Heidi Lutjens, Jennifer Myhre
Stephanie Jilcott, Scott Ickes, Alice Ammerman,Heidi Lutjens, Jennifer Myhre
THE UGANDA NUTRITION CONGRESS February 19th-20th 2009 The Challenges, Successes and Opportunities to Improve Nutrition Munyonyo Commonwealth Speke Resort Hotel Kampala, Uganda
Malnutrition is a global public health problem, contributing to 50% of child deaths.
Stunted linear growth is associated with lower academic achievement and cognitive function.Stunting prevalence in Bundibugyo (45%).
Supplemental feeding (SF) programs are one strategy to combat malnutrition/ stunting.Introduction
Ready-to-use-therapeutic food (RUTF) is often used in supplemental feeding programs.
The high cost of imported RUTF has prompted attention to local RUTF/RUF (ready-to-use food) production.
Ideally RUF should be:Made from local food sources Made by community membersDistributed by local health workersIntroduction
In November 2007, World Harvest Mission (WHM) established a community-based supplemental feeding program that provides a locally-sourced and produced ready-to-use-food and complementary feeding education to underweight children ages 6-59 months.
Inclusion criteria:Weight < 3rd percentile weight-for-ageMUAC < 12cmNo severe concurrent illness
10 week program provides:Weekly growth monitoringWeekly complementary feeding education680 kcal per day RUFDe-worming pillVitamin AMultivitamin with iron
The BBB Program was designed to: increase sustainability by using local food and local health workers, increase RUF production capacity for womens groups,empower caregivers by providing nutrition education, provide RUF and community-based care for underweight children. Aims
To describe the WHM supplemental feeding (BBB) program design, implementation, and preliminary program evaluation. Purpose
Initially, WHM staff: (1) trained local health workers to administer the program and provide nutrition information to caregivers, (2) identified and trained local womens groups to produce RUF (production teams), (3) established the two SF programs(4) conducted qualitative interviews with caregivers and members of RUF production teams, and(5) examined RUF nutrient analysis. Methods Overview
Screening days were announced at each health center, local schools, and churches. Eligible if:Weight-for-age was < the lowest line (3rd percentile line) on the standard Ugandan immunization card and/or Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 12 cm or Referred from the WHM inpatient feeding program. Initial enrollment target of 20 children per site.Busunga Health CenterBusaru Health CenterBoth ~2 miles from Nyahuka Health Center Methods: Enrollment
Weight, height, MUAC, birth date, and age recorded.
Growth velocity was calculated in terms of grams per kilogram of weight gain per dayFinal weight (g) initial weight (g)/ initial weight (kg)/ # days
Growth velocities (SE) calculated using the mean function in STATA 9.0.Methods: Quantitative Data Collection and Analysis
Conducted in-depth interviews with production team chairpersonsDetailed notes were taken and reviewed by investigators following the interviews.
Conducted nine structured caregiver interviews and home feeding observations.Methods: Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis
Production Team Chairperson Questions: What are the benefits of being on this production team? What are the difficult things about being on this production team?Have there been problems on your team?Does anyone from the community come to use the grinder?Do you and your family enjoy the product?
Caregiver Questions: How do you prepare the BBB food? Please show me.What do you enjoy about the BBB program? Tell me about that.What is hard for you about the BBB program? Tell me about that.Is there anything that you would like the BBB program to change about the food you receive? Tell me about that.Methods: Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis
The RUF was prepared by roasting groundnuts and soybeans in a metal pot over a charcoal fire, then hand-grinding them.Moringa oleifera leaves were mixed into the groundnut paste.Methods: RUF Preparation
Participants were provided 2 separate 450 g bags of roasted soybean flour and groundnut paste mixed with moringa leaf powder.
Samples of the groundnut paste and moringa powder (without the soy flour) were analyzed at the Department of Food Science and Technology, Makerere University.Methods: RUF Nutrient Analysis
Production team chairpersons reported the benefit of increased knowledge of healthy foods to feed young children: Being on the production team, we have learned how to care for our families.An additional benefit to having a production team in the community was an increase in community members motivation to cultivate groundnuts and soybeans for grinding.Results: Production Team interviews
Chairpersons noted the challenge of grinding and lack of acceptable financial incentives for production. For instance, one older production team member said: Grinding is hard for some of us. We are becoming old.
Regarding financial incentives, teams noted a preference for getting paid directly for the work instead of in-kind compensation initially provided:We are working for free with no allowanceit is making some members leave the work.
Results: Production Team interviews
Caregivers often prepared the BBB supplement as a dilute sauce for staple food versus using as RUF.Educational message added to encourage caregivers to use a 2:1 ratio of BBB supplement to staple.
Often, the BBB supplement components were not consumed together, affecting nutrient composition. Educational message added to educate caregivers on importance of mixing groundnut paste and soy flour bags together immediately after returning home.Results: Caregiver interviews/ observations
Results: Nutrient analysis per 100 grams BBB RUF Comparative selective nutrient analysis per 100 grams of soy flour, BBB peanut paste, total BBB food supplement (soy flour plus BBB paste), commercial ready-to-use therapeutic food (Plumpynut) and USAID corn soy blend.
Source: Jilcott, Ickes, Myhre & Ammerman. Mater Child Health J, 2009. Nutrient analysis performed by Dr. Archileo N. Kaaya, Department of Food Science and Technology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Total BBB supplement
Corn Soy Blend
Total Energy (kcal)
Crude fat (g)
Crude protein (g)
Dietary fiber (g)
Vitamin C (mg)
Vitamin A (iu)
Aflatoxin content (ppb)
Results: Growth VelocitiesMean (SE) = 2.5 (0.6) g/kg/dMean (SE) = 7.4(7.3) g/d
CycleNumber enrolledMean age (months)Gender(%male) WeightBaseline (kg)Height baseline (cm)MUAC baseline (cm)Weight gain (g/kg/d))Busunga 12118.5 (2.2)40.06.8 (0.4)--11.5 (0.2)6.0 (0.8)Busaru11631.7 (4.5)68.28.2 (0.5)76.4 (2.5)12.6 (2.5)3.6 (1.0)Busunga21616.7 (2.1)52.46.4 (0.3)63.7 (1.4)11.7 (0.3)3.3(0.8)Busaru221--50.07.9 (0.5)----3.1 (1.1)Busunga 32520.0 (2.3)41.66.6 (0.3)69.0 (1.5)11.6 (0.3)1.3 (0.2)Busaru32627.4 (2.8)46.27.5 (0.3)72.6 (1.6)13.1 (0.3)2.3 (0.5)Busunga 42213.5 (1.3)61.15.8 (0.3)62.5 (1.5)11.9 (0.3)1.7 (0.6)Busaru41824.7 (2.8)72.07.3 (0.3)70.8 (1.5)12.3 (0.3)1.2 (0.6)Busunga52518.7 (2.5)32.06.9 (0.4)69.3(1.9)12.4(0.2)1.9 (0.3)Busaru52518.7 (3.0)36.07.7 (0.6)70.4 (2.2)12.6 (0.4)0.9 (0.3)
The BBB program model is a promising strategy for community-based care of moderately malnourished children. BBB supplement had similar protein and energy density as commercial RUTF.Chairpersons and caregivers appreciate the program.Conclusions
To draw comparison with similar programs, we calculated mean daily weight gain (SD) after the program duration changed to 10-week cycles (4 and 5) BBB program participants gained 7.4(7.3) g/day. Maleta et al (2004): 3.3 (3.4) g/day during 12-week supplementation with 500 kcal/d of RUTF.Flax et al (2008): 11.9 (6.0) g/day with 12-week supplementation with 250 kcal/d of RUTF.
The program was altered to address findings of preliminary analyses:Production teams changed to the small business model, providing financial incentive for continued RUF production.Educational messages regarding RUF preparation were emphasized to improve caregiver feeding practices.Conclusions
Limitations:Study was not powered to detect a particular effect. The interpretation of modest growth velocities is complicated by the wide age range of participants.It is impossible to separate out the effects of all program components. No standard quality control measures for RUF production.
Strengths: Use of weight-for-age criteria to enroll children, as it is easily comprehended by local health workers. BBB supplement had no trace of aflatoxin and no caregivers have reported peanut allergies.High energy density of the BBB supplement.Limitations and Strengths
Future efforts are needed to educate caregivers on correct RUF use, explore how RUF is incorporated into the local diet, and improve commercial viability of this energy-dense supplemental food in local markets.See Scott Ickes poster: FEEDING PRACTICES AND CONSUMPTION OF LOCALLY PRODUCED READY-TO-USE-FOOD AMONG UNDERWEIGHT CHILDREN AGES 6-59 MONTHS C