Status of Neutrino Science

30
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003

description

Status of Neutrino Science. Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003. Two Main Directions. Neutrino Properties Neutrino Masses Neutrino Mixings Nature of Neutrinos Neutrino as a Probe Parton Distribution Function Precision Electroweak Physics Neutrino Astrophysics. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Status of Neutrino Science

Page 1: Status of Neutrino Science

Status of Neutrino Science

Hitoshi Murayama

LBNLnu

April 11, 2003

Page 2: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 2

Two Main Directions

• Neutrino Properties– Neutrino Masses– Neutrino Mixings– Nature of Neutrinos

• Neutrino as a Probe– Parton Distribution Function– Precision Electroweak Physics– Neutrino Astrophysics

Page 3: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 3

Outline

• Introduction

• Current Status of Neutrino Oscillation

• Main Scientific Questions

• Majorana vs Dirac

• The last mixing angle and CP violation

• Conclusion

Page 4: Status of Neutrino Science

Current Status of Neutrino Oscillation

Page 5: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 5

Rare Effects from High-Energies

• Effects of physics beyond the SM as effective operators

• Can be classified systematically (Weinberg)

Page 6: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 6

Unique Role of Neutrino Mass

• Lowest order effect of physics at short distances

• Tiny effect (m/E)2~(eV/GeV)2=10–18!

• Interferometry (i.e., Michaelson-Morley)!– Need coherent source

– Need interference (i.e., large mixing angles)

– Need long baseline

Nature was kind to provide all of them!

• “neutrino interferometry” (a.k.a. neutrino oscillation) a unique tool to study physics at very high scales

Page 7: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 7

MNS matrix

• Standard parameterization of Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix for 3 generations

UMNS=

Ue1 Ue2 Ue3

Uμ1 Uμ2 Uμ3

Uτ1 Uτ2 Uτ3

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

=

1

c23 s23

−s23 c23

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

c13 s13e−iδ

1

−s13eiδ c13

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

c12 s12

−s12 c12

1

⎜ ⎜ ⎜

⎟ ⎟ ⎟

atmospheric ??? solar

Page 8: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 8

What we learned in 2001–2

• Atmospheric is lost (>10), converted most likely to (>99%CL) (SK, MACRO, SOUDAN-II)

• Solar e is converted to either or (>5) (SNO)

• Reactor anti-e are lost (99.95%CL) (KamLAND)

• Only the LMA solution left for solar neutrinos• Tiny neutrino mass: the first evidence for

incompleteness of Minimal Standard Model

Page 9: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 9

SNO Result

• Only e produced in the Sun• Wrong Neutrinos are

coming from the Sun!• Somehow some of e were

converted to on their way from the Sun’s core to the detector neutrino oscillation!

ΦCC =1.76 ± 0.05 ± 0.09 ⋅106 cm−2 sec−1

ΦNC = 5.09 −0.43+0.44 −0.43

+0.46 ⋅106 cm−2 sec−1

Page 10: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 10

KamLAND result

• First terrestrial expt relevant to solar neutrino problem

• KamLAND will exclude or verify LMA definitively

Dec 2002Expected #events: 86.8±5.6

Background #events: 0.95±0.99Observed #events: 54

No oscillation hypothesisExcluded at 99.95%

Page 11: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 11

Summary of Neutrino Oscillation

Before SNO and KamLAND

Dec 2002with SNO and KamLAND

Page 12: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 12

Three-generation

• Solar, reactor & atmospheric oscillations easily accommodated within three generations

• sin2223 near maximal, m2atm ~ 310–3eV2

• sin2212 large, m2solar ~ 5–2010–5eV2

• sin2213=|Ue3|2< 0.05 from CHOOZ, Palo Verde

• Because of small sin2213, solar (reactor) & atmospheric oscillations almost decouple

Page 13: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 13

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Page 14: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 14

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Page 15: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 15

Extended Standard Model

• Massive Neutrinos Minimal SM incomplete• How exactly do we extend it?• Abandon either

– Minimality: introduce new unobserved light degrees of freedom (right-handed neutrinos)

– Lepton number: abandon distinction between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos and hence matter and anti-matter

• Dirac or Majorana neutrino• Without knowing which, we don’t know how to

extend the Standard Model

Page 16: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 16

Theoretical Bias:Seesaw Mechanism

• Why is neutrino mass so small?

• Need right-handed neutrinos to generate neutrino mass

νL νR( )mD

mD

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νLνR

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νL νR( )

mD

mD M

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ νLνR

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟ mν =

mD2

M<<mD

To obtain m3~(m2atm)1/2, mD~mt, M3~1015GeV (GUT!)

Majorana Neutrinos

, but R SM neutral

Page 17: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 17

Neutrinoless Double-beta Decay

• The only known practical approach to discriminate Majorana vs Dirac neutrinos

0: nn ppe–e– with no neutrinos• Matrix element <me>=imiUei

2

• Current limit |<me>| ≤ about 1eV• m3~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV looks a promising goal• However, m3Ue3

2<<m3 and we can ignore m3 • Fortunately, Ue1

2 and Ue22 cannot cancel exactly because

the maximal angle excluded by SNO: Ue12–

Ue22=cos2212>0.07 (1)

Page 18: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 18

Three Types of Mass Spectrum

• Degenerate– All three around >0.1eV with small splittings– Possible even after WMAP+2dF: m<0.23eV– May be confirmed by KATRIN, cosmology– |<me>|=|imiUei

2|>m cos2212>0.07m

• Inverted– m3~0, m1~m2~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV– May be confirmed by long-baseline experiment with matter effect– |<me>|=|imiUei

2|>(m223)1/2 cos2212>0.0035eV

• Normal– m1~m2~0, m3~(m2

23)1/2≈0.05eV– |<me>|=|imiUei

2| may be zero even if Majorana

Page 19: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 19

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Page 20: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 20

Now that LMA is confirmed...

• Dream case for neutrino oscillation physics!• m2

solar within reach of long-baseline expts• Even CP violation may be probable

– neutrino superbeam– muon-storage ring neutrino factory

• Possible only if:– m12

2, s12 large enough (LMA)– 13 large enough

P(ν μ → ν e ) − P(ν μ → ν e ) = −16s12c12s13c132 s23c23

sinδ sinΔm12

2

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟sin

Δm132

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟sin

Δm232

4EL

⎝ ⎜

⎠ ⎟

Page 21: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 21

Shootout (Lindner)

Page 22: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 22

Page 23: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 23

Page 24: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 24

13 decides the future

• The value of 13 crucial for the future of neutrino oscillation physics

• Determines the required facility/parameters/baseline/energy

• Two paths to determine 13

– Long-baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation– Reactor neutrino experiment with two detectors

Page 25: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 25

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Page 26: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 26

Verify Oscillation

• Even atmospheric neutrino data do not show “oscillation” yet MINOS, J-PARC

m223, 23, mass

hierarchy and 13

• KamLAND data is consistent with overall suppression continued running

m212

Page 27: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 27

Low-Energy Solar Neutrinos

• Solar neutrino data suggest energy-dependent survival probability tests MSW effect

12

Helps interpretation of CP violation, double beta decay data

7%1%

20%

Page 28: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 28

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Page 29: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 29

If LSND right,All hell breaks loose

• Sterile neutrinos are strongly constrained by the combination of all existing data and WMAP+2dF

• CPT violation is strongly constrained by SNO+KamLAND

• If LSND correct, all previous measurements need to be re-examined by a collection of short-, medium- and long-baseline experiments. Possibly mini-muon-storage ring.

Page 30: Status of Neutrino Science

LBNLnu Hitoshi Murayama 30

Seven Questions

• Dirac or Majorana? • Absolute mass scale?

• How small is 13?

• CP Violation?• Mass hierarchy?• Verify Oscillation?• LSND? Sterile neutrino(s)? CPT violation?

Specific recommendations to attack these questions in the context of LBNL