1 Dan Florentina Madalina Colegiul Economic Virgil Madgearu ...
Status of Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Frierson and Utterback...
Transcript of Status of Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Frierson and Utterback...
Status of Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Frierson and Utterback 1916),
Curtis Pearlymussel, in Arkansas
John L. Harris
1, Jerry L. Farris
1,2,3, and Alan D. Christian
1,2
1Arkansas State University, Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 599, State
University AR 72467, 2
Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 847,
State University AR 72467,3 Associate Dean, College of Sciences and Mathematics, P.O.
Box 1030, State University, AR 72467
Final Report
31 December 2007
Status of Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Frierson and Utterback 1916),
Curtis Pearlymussel, in Arkansas
John L. Harris
1, Jerry L. Farris
1,2,3, and Alan D. Christian
1,2
1Arkansas State University, Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 599, State
University AR 72467, 2
Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 847,
State University AR 72467,3 Associate Dean, College of Sciences and Mathematics, P.O.
Box 1030, State University, AR 72467
ABSTRACT
Mussel surveys were conducted from 1996 - 2006 in Ozark Highland portions of White
River Drainage, Arkansas streams in search of Epioblasma florentina curtisii, Curtis
pearlymussel. In total, 11 rivers or creeks draining the Ozark Highlands were partially
or completely surveyed covering more than 550 stream miles (> 880 stream kilometers)
using a combination of qualitative and quantitative survey methods to sample 276 sites.
Survey efforts were concentrated in the Buffalo, Little Red, Spring, South Fork Spring,
Strawberry, and White rivers.
A review of the literature and museum holdings revealed four reported E. florentina
curtisii localities in Arkansas, two in the South Fork Spring River, one in the Spring
River, and one in the Black River. Voucher specimens are available for one of the South
Fork Spring River sites (University of Arkansas Collections, Fayetteville) and the Spring
River at Hardy site (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago 59219 and National
Museum of Natural History 160736). The Black River locality record is in doubt as no
voucher specimens are available, and the photographic documentation suggests a possible
case of mis-labeled field data.
This survey effort did not find any live, fresh dead or relict specimens of Epioblasma
florentina curtisii. However, live individuals of E. triquetra (snuffbox) were reported for
the first time from the Buffalo River, and substantial numbers of fresh dead (in muskrat
middens) and living E. triquetra were found at two sites in the Spring River downstream
of Imboden. Mussel aggregations having high density and diversity mussel were located
in the Buffalo, Spring, South Fork Spring, and Strawberry rivers. Those sites where the
greatest community diversity was recorded warrant future survey attention, as well as
inspection for the presence of E. florentina curtisii..
INTRODUCTION
Epioblasma florentina curtisii was described as Truncilla curtisii (“Curtis’ shell”) by
Frierson and Utterback in The Naiades of Missouri (Utterback 1916; p. 190-192). The
types, two females and a male, were from the White River at Hollister, Taney County,
Missouri which is now affected by the tailwaters of Table Rock Lake. These specimens,
represented in the original description as hand drawn figures, are apparently lost, and a
lectotype was designated by Johnson (1978) from University of Michigan Museum of
Zoology (UMMZ) series 90748. Stansbery (1971) recognized E. florentina curtisii as a
subspecies based primarily on epidermal coloration, and Johnson (1978) questioned the
need for its recognition based on (lack of) morphological differences with E. florentina
florentina. Turgeon et al. (1998) maintained the subspecific designation recognizing
Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Frierson and Utterback 1916).
Frierson (1927) erected several new subgenera without descriptions, only citing type
species (Johnson 1978), and Epioblasma florentina was included in the subgenus
Capsaeformis (Frierson 1927) with E. capsaeformis and E. turgidula. Johnson (1978)
subsequently placed these species in the subgenus Torulosa (with E. torulosa, E.
biemarginata, E. propinqua, and E. sampsoni) citing that the minor conchological
characters differentiating the subgenera did not warrant the use of Capsaeformis.
Subgenus Torulosa, commonly known as the riffleshells, currently includes E.
biemarginata, E. capsaeformis, E. florentina, E. phillipsi, E. propinqua, E. sampsoni, E.
torulosa, and E. turgidula (Jones et al. 2006)
Early in the 1900s, Epioblasma florentina curtisii occurred at scattered locations in the
White and St. Francis River basins in southern Missouri and northern Arkansas (U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service 1986). Johnson (1978), Harris and Gordon (1987), and Harris
et al. (1997) reviewed the historic Arkansas distribution of E. florentina curtisii, and the
only known localities in Arkansas are from the Spring and South Fork Spring rivers of
the White River Drainage in northeast Arkansas.
Epioblasma florentina curtisii has been found in stream reaches which are transition
areas between headwater and lowland stream reaches having been found in order 4 to 7
streams with gradients of 0.9-8.0 feet per mile with stable substrates of sand and gravel to
gravel, cobble and boulder, in riffles or runs (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1986).
Oesch (1995) summarized the habitat in Missouri as small to medium gravel substrate
and in quiet water at the edge of a good current or in water with a moderate current.
Bruenderman et al. (2001) reported habitat and water quality degradation in the Little
Black River, Missouri and hypothesized that Epioblasma florentina curtisii was
extirpated from its last known refuge in that state. Similar, if less severe, water quality
degradation, primarily in the form of sedimentation, has been reported in the Buffalo
River (Harris 1996), Spring River (Trauth et al. 2007), and Strawberry River (ADEQ
Final Report Page 2
2004) in Arkansas, and much of the mainstem White River lotic fauna in Arkansas
suffers from the effects of impoundment and hypolimnetic releases from dams in
Arkansas and Missouri (Gordon 1982, Christian 1995, Harris 2002). Nevertheless, the
Spring and Strawberry river drainages are noted for their high species richness and are
exceptional in comparison to other streams in Arkansas and Missouri (Harris 1999).
Historic White River Drainage (Arkansas) Mussel Surveys (Pre 1997)
Gordon et al. (1980) summarized the Arkansas distribution of unionids based on museum
collections, and the historic mussel surveys that included Call (1895), Meek and Clark
(1912), Wheeler (1914, 1918), and Hinkley (1916). In the early 1980s, Gordon and
Harris (1983) initiated surveys in search of Arkansas’ rare unionids including
Epioblasma florentina curtisii. Table 1 and the following discussion summarize mussel
survey effort in major White River drainages prior to 1997.
Black River
Ecological Consultants, Inc. (1983) surveyed 12 sites on the Black River from its
confluence with the White River (Jackson County) upstream to Pocahontas, Randolph
County. Three specimens (2 females, 1 male) collected from the mouth of the Spring
River were identified as Epioblasma florentina curtisii, and the specimens were judged to
have been dead less than two years based on criteria conventionally used by
malacologists (Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1983). It is unclear if the specimens figured
in Ecological Consultants, Inc. (1984) are the specimens collected at the mouth of the
Spring River, and it is unknown if these specimens were deposited in a museum
collection.
Gordon et al. (1984) utilized crowfoot Braille and SCUBA diving to survey 28 river
miles of the Black River from six miles upstream of U. S. Highway 67 at Pocahontas,
Randolph County downstream to U. S. Highway 63 at Black Rock, Lawrence County.
Fifty-six sites were sampled using the crowfoot braille to locate large, dense
aggregations, and then SCUBA techniques were used to intensively sample 11 high-
density areas.
Rust (1993) surveyed the Black River from the Arkansas-Missouri state line to the
confluence with the White River, a distance of approximately 171 river miles (275 river
kilometers = rkm). Rust’s survey methodology was designed to delineate the area
inhabited by and provide populations estimates for large, high-density mussel
aggregations. The Black River is unique in that it parallels the interface of the Ozark
Highlands and Mississippi Alluvial Plain with incursions into the Ozark Central Plateau
near Pocahontas, Randolph County and upstream of the mouth of the Spring River near
Black Rock downstream to near Old Davidsonville, Lawrence County (ca. 20 rm ~ 32.2
rkm).
Final Report Page 3
Table 1. Summary of study area (Ozark Highlands,
White River drainage, Arkansas) mussel survey data 1980-1995.
Final Report Page 4
Table 1. (continued) Summary of study area (Ozark Highlands,
White River drainage, Arkansas) mussel survey data 1980-1995.
Final Report Page 5
Buffalo River
Meek and Clark (1912) surveyed the mainstem of the Buffalo River from Pruitt, Newton
County, downstream to the confluence of the Buffalo and White rivers near Buffalo City,
Baxter County, during July and August 1910. Twenty-six stations were qualitatively
sampled and 22 species were recorded.
Harris (1996) surveyed the Buffalo River from Arkansas Highway 7 near Pruitt
downstream to the confluence of the Buffalo with the White River. The survey was
conducted by canoe using both snorkel and hookah dive techniques and 40 sites were
assessed. The primary goals of this survey were to revisit the sites described by Meek
and Clark (1912), determine if they were extant, and document the present mussel
diversity of the Buffalo River.
Current River
Gordon and Harris (1983) sampled four sites by snorkel techniques while surveying 3.7
miles of the Current River via canoe access. The survey effort extended from the
Arkansas – Missouri state line to west of Success, Clay County.
Little Red River
Clarke (1987) summarized the known information regarding mussels of the Little Red
River during surveys to assess the status of Lampsilis streckeri. Survey effort consisted
of 21 sites in the forks of the Little Red River, primarily the Middle Fork Little Red
River. Harris (1991, 1992a, 1992b, and 1993) surveyed numerous sites, primarily in the
Middle Fork Little Red River, utilizing dive and snorkel techniques. The 1991 and 1992b
efforts were intensive surveys of a relatively small area associated with a natural gas
pipeline crossing of the Middle Fork Little Red River, and the 1993 survey was an
intensive effort at two localized sites.
Spring River
Gordon and Harris (1983) surveyed approximately 38 rm (61 rkm) of the Spring River by
canoe over a two-day period in September 1983. The survey methodology included
collection of fresh dead and relict shells from middens and depositional areas (gravel
bars, islands) and snorkeling / hand grubbing for live mussels. Total effort expended at
each of the 18 collections sites ranged from 1-2 person hours.
The Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD 1984) performed a
systematic removal and relocation of a mussel aggregation at a bridge construction site
for a county road bridge crossing south of Ravenden, Lawrence County. A total of
1,483-m2
quadrats were excavated, and the mussels identified, enumerated, and relocated
upstream of the project area over a four week period in May-June 1984. Thirty-three taxa
Final Report Page 6
were identified among the 3372 live mussels relocated, and these included one live
Epioblasma triquetra.
Miller and Nelson (1984) visually surveyed the Spring River from the mouth upstream to
Imboden and collected dead shells from middens and depositional areas at one site (RM
11). This collection yielded 24 species.
Gordon et al. (1984) sampled 24 sites in the lower Spring River from the mouth upstream
to Imboden, Lawrence and Randolph counties during July 1984. Crowfoot braille
techniques were used to sample all sites, and SCUBA dive, snorkel, and hand grubbing
techniques were used to more intensively sample 14 of these 24 sites. Thirty-five
species were encountered including relict specimens of E. triquetra from two sites.
Harris and Welch (1985) surveyed the source waters of the Spring River beginning at the
spring run exiting Mammoth Spring, Fulton County, and extending downstream a
distance of approximately 0.5 rm (0.8 rkm). The intensive survey effort yielded only
seven native species despite nine person hours of sample time.
Rust (1993) surveyed 36 sites in the Spring River from the mouth upstream to Imboden
using hookah dive techniques. Six mussel aggregations (beds) were located, defined, and
sampled; three using stratified random m2 quadrat (quantitative) sampling methodology,
and three using haphazardly placed m2 quadrat (semi-quantitative) sampling
methodology. The three beds quantitatively assessed ranged in size from 500 m2 to 1,500
m2 and had substantial sample effort ranging from 25-62 m
2 quadrats excavated. The
remaining three aggregations were sampled by excavating 10 m2 per aggregation.
South Fork Spring River
Gordon and Harris (1983) surveyed six road crossing or vehicle access sites over two
days in October 1983. Twenty-six taxa were found but no representatives of Epioblasma.
Strawberry River
Gordon and Harris (1983) surveyed seven road crossing or vehicle access sites in a single
day during September 1983. Thirty-three species were documented including relicts of
Epioblasma triquetra. Rust (1993) surveyed 26 sites by hookah diving over
approximately 13 rm (ca. 20 rkm) from the mouth upstream to AR Highway 25 near
Strawberry, Lawrence County. Rust (1993) sampled one minor aggregation using semi-
quantitative m2 quadrat excavations and documented 14 species.
White River
Dames and Moore (1977) sampled the White River between RM 261-276 in November
1977 utilizing primarily crowfoot braille methods with diving substituted at one site. The
Final Report Page 7
area sampled was presented as braille hauls totaling a distance of 3090 yards (2.8 km)
and a total sample area equal to approximately 10,300 yd2 (8600 m
2). Twenty specimens
representing 12 taxa were collected over the three-day survey period.
Gordon (1980a) qualitatively surveyed 33 sites in the White River headwaters of
Madison and Washington counties at vehicle access sites and documented 24 species.
Further downstream below the reservoirs, Harris (1994) qualitatively dive surveyed 23
sites between White River Miles 260-264 upstream of the Black River confluence. A
total of 12 species were documented from these sites.
Christian (1995) surveyed the large, commercially valuable mussel aggregations of the
White River from the mouth upstream to the confluence of the Black and White rivers
near Newport, Jackson County, a distance of approximately 257 rm (413.5 rkm). More
importantly from the perspective of Interior Highland distributed species such as
Epioblasma, Christian (1995) also surveyed a 10 rm (16.1 rkm) segment beginning at
Lock and Dam 1 at Batesville, Independence County and extending upstream for 10 rm.
Fourteen species were documented from 15 exploratory dives and from semi-quantitative
dive sampling at two sites.
Harris (1995) surveyed a 10 rm (16.1 rkm) segment of the White River (RM 264-274)
near the interface of the Ozark Highlands (Springfield Plateau) and the Mississippi
Alluvial Valley (Western Lowlands Holocene Meander Belts). Using Hookah dive
equipment, Harris (1995) surveyed 47 sites and found 20 species.
METHODS
The authors, their students, and colleagues have conducted numerous mussel surveys in
Ozark Highland tributaries to the White River since 1996. An effort was made to
summarize the locations, level of effort, and results of these surveys prior to initiating
additional surveys in search of Epioblasma florentina curtisii.
Museum collections were searched to determine the historic distribution of E. florentina
curtisii so that emphasis was placed on surveying the historic locations or stream systems
having habitat with similar characteristics as those reported for historic sites. Digital
databases were searched on the Internet for the following museum collections: Academy
of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia (ANSP); Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard
University (MCZ); University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ); Ohio State
University Museum of Zoology (OSUMZ); Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS); Field
Museum of Natural History, Chicago (FMNH); Florida Museum of Natural History
(FLMNH); United States National Museum, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural
History (NMNH); and Mayborn Museum Complex, Baylor University (MMC). In
addition, Butler (2007) was utilized as a reference for E. triquetra localities in Arkansas.
Final Report Page 8
In order to maximize the probability of locating E. florentina curtisii, the survey effort
was concentrated in the Buffalo, Strawberry, Spring, and South Fork Spring river
drainages (Figure 1). Survey sites were accessed by canoeing or boating the entire length
of each river and timed searches of suitable mussel habitat were performed using snorkel
and/or dive techniques. Over night camping was required twice during the Strawberry
River survey due to distance between access points. Each survey site was searched by
multiple individuals ranging from 2-8 per site and search strategies included hand
grubbing, over turning slab rocks and boulders, wafting fine sediments, searching
depositional areas, and collecting shell material from middens.
Nomenclature follows Turgeon et al. (1998), and voucher specimens of fresh dead shell
material and live collected specimens are already or soon to be deposited at the Arkansas
State University Museum of Zoology. Dead shells were noted as fresh dead (F),
weathered dead (W) or sub-fossil (SF) for each collection site. Fresh dead shells retained
intact persiostracum with a minimum of flaking and the nacre showed little evidence of
chalking. Weathered dead shells had flaking or totally missing periostracum, chalky
nacre, but lateral and pseudocardinal teeth were mostly intact. Sub-fossil shells were
without periostracum, nacres was chalking, flaking, and/or layers were missing, and teeth
were generally eroded or worn off. Live material collected for vouchers was fixed in
100% ethanol for future genetic studies. Length of stream surveyed for all studies was
determined using the measure tool in the Delorme Topo USA software program version
5.0 (DeLorme 2004).
RESULTS
Table 2 summarizes the on-line survey results of museum records and holdings for
Epioblasma florentina curtisii and E. turgidula in Arkansas and Missouri. Table 2 also
includes museum records for E. triquetra collected from Arkansas only.
Table 3 summarizes the surveys conducted in the Ozark Highland portions of the White
River drainage from 1996 to present. Specific drainages that received substantial survey
effort are addressed more fully in the following subsections.
Final Report Page 9
Final Report Page 10
Table 2. Museum holdings of Epioblasma florentina curtisii in Arkansas and Missouri, and E. triquetra in Arkansas.
Final Report Page 11
Buffalo River
During 2004 and 2005, Matthews (2007) conducted a survey of 146 rm (235 rkm) of the
Buffalo River from Dixon Ford in the Ozark National Forest, Newton County,
downstream to the confluence of the Buffalo and White rivers, near Buffalo City, Baxter
County. Matthews assessed 33 sites using qualitative sampling by timed visual searches
(wading, snorkeling, and diving methods) and 22 sites using quantitative sampling by
stratified random m2 quadrat excavation. Twenty-two species were represented from
among the 2,870 individuals collected including two specimens of Epioblasma triquetra,
a species that was previously unreported from the river. Unionid diversity of the Buffalo
River now totals 29 species.
Kings River
W. R. Posey II, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (AGFC) malacologist, surveyed
19 sites in the Kings River over three days in May 2003 (Posey, personal
communication). The survey extended from the AGFC Rockhouse Access in Madison
County downstream to the AGFC Lower Kings River Access at County Road 450,
Carroll County approximately 3.0 river miles (4.8 rkm) upstream of the Arkansas
Missouri state line. Total length of the survey was approximately 37 river miles (59.5
rkm). Sites were accessed via canoe, and all sites were qualitatively sampled using timed
visual searches by two surveyors with snorkel gear. No Epioblasma species were found.
Little Red River
During 2000-2001, Winterringer (2003) surveyed approximately 59.5 river miles (95.7
rkm) of the Middle Fork Little Red River from Searcy County Road 7 downstream to the
confluence with Greers Ferry Lake as part of a population dynamics and reproductive
biology study of Lampsilis streckeri (Frierson 1927). Fourteen sites were selected for
intensive analysis that included both timed visual search and quantitative 0.25 m2 quadrat
sampling. No Epioblasma species were encountered.
C. L. Davidson (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service) and W. R. Posey II conducted surveys
in major tributaries of the Little Red River (Table 3) from 2004-2006 that included:
Archey Fork Little Red River from Castleberry Creek to U.S. Highway 65, Turkey Creek
from Stone County Road 21 to the confluence with Beech Fork Little Red River, Beech
Fork Little Red River from origin to Everett Ridge Road, Middle Fork Little Red River
from Searcy County Road 9 to U. S. Highway 65, South Fork Little Red River from Gulf
Mountain Road to Greers Ferry Reservoir, and Big Creek from Tylar Road in
Independence County to McJester Road in Cleburne County. A total of 32 sites were
surveyed using qualitative sampling by timed visual searches (wading and snorkeling)
(Davidson and Posey, personal communication). The primary focus of their
investigations was determining status of Lampsilis streckeri in these streams. These
survey efforts documented 24 species, however no Epioblasma species were encountered.
Final Report Page 12
Spring River
A summary of 2004-2005 survey results is presented in Table 4 and site field data sheets
are located in Appendix I. In addition, results of 2005 quantitative surveys at seven
Spring River sites presented in Trauth et al. (2007) are included in Table 3 and
population estimate data are placed in Appendix II. Thirty-five sample collections were
made at 30 sites during the course of this survey, and 69.4 person hours were expended
on qualitative searches. An additional seven days were spent collecting quantitative data
at seven sites. Locations of survey sites are provided in Figure 2a for sites between
Mammoth Spring and Hardy and in Figure 2b for sites between Hardy and the confluence
of the Spring and Black rivers.
Thirty-nine species were recorded during these efforts, but no live or relict specimens of
Epioblasma florentina curtisii were found. However, substantial numbers of fresh dead
E. triquetra were found at two sites with live specimens found at one of those.
South Fork Spring River
A summary of 2001-2005 qualitative survey results and the results of quantitative
samples taken in 2006 (H. Martin, personal communication) are presented in Table 5.
Sixty-five sample collections were made at 53 sites, and the distribution of these sites is
illustrated in Figures 3a (sites upstream of Arkansas Highway 9 near Salem) and 3b (sites
downstream of Arkansas Highway 9 to confluence of South Fork Spring and Spring
rivers). Qualitative survey sites (n=35) sampled by H. Martin in 2006 are shown in the
figures but not included in the summary of survey results found in Table 5.
Approximately 62.2 person hours were expended on 21 qualitative search sites in 2001-
2005, and 35 person hours were expended on 35 sites in 2006 (H. Martin, personal
communication). An additional five field days were spent collecting and establishing
quantitative data for nine sites.
Thirty-seven species were recorded during these surveys, but no live or relict specimens
of Epioblasma species were found.
Myatt Creek
Myatt Creek is a major tributary to the Spring River with its confluence approximately
8.4 rkm (5.2 rm) upstream of the South Fork Spring River confluence in Hardy.
Davidson (1997) surveyed a 23.2 rkm length of Myatt Creek via canoe in August and
September 1996 and searched two additional lengths at road crossings via pedestrian
access. A total of 11 sites were surveyed and 19 species documented, but no liver or
relict specimens of Epioblasma species were found..
Final Report Page 13
Table 3. Summary of study area (Ozark Highlands, White River drainage, Arkansas)
mussel survey data 1996-2006.
Final Report Page 14
Table 4. Summary of Spring River Arkansas mussel survey data 2004-2005.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 15
Table 4. (continued) Summary of Spring River Arkansas mussel survey data 2004-2005.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 16
Table 4. (continued) Summary of Spring River Arkansas mussel survey data 2004-2005.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 17
Final Report Page 18
Final Report Page 19
Final Report Page 20
Final Report Page 21
Table 5. Summary of South Fork Spring River Arkansas mussel survey data 2001-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 22
Table 5. Summary of South Fork Spring River Arkansas mussel survey data 2001-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 23
Table 6. Summary of Strawberry River Arkansas mussel survey data 1983-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 24
Table 6. (continued) Summary of Strawberry River Arkansas mussel survey data 1983-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 25
Table 6. (continued) Summary of Strawberry River Arkansas mussel survey data 1983-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 26
Table 6. (continued) Summary of Strawberry River Arkansas mussel survey data 1983-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 27
Table 6. (continued) Summary of Strawberry River Arkansas mussel survey data 1983-2006.
(F=fresh dead; W=weathered dead; SF=sub-fossil, v=valve)
Final Report Page 28
Strawberry River
A summary of 1996-2006 qualitative survey results is presented in Table 6, and the data
acquired by Gordon and Harris (1983) and Rust (1993) are also included. Data for 59
sites are summarized, and 51 of these were surveyed from 1996-2006, during which time
69.2 person hours were expended searching these sites over 12 field days. Site locations
are illustrated in Figures 4a and 4b.
Distributional and relative abundance data were acquired for 39 species, and relict
Epioblasma triquetra were found at three sites. No E. florentina curtisii were collected
during the Strawberry River survey.
DISCUSSION
Epioblasma florentina curtisii is known in Arkansas from three reported historic
collection sites in the Spring River drainage in the north central portion of the state
(Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1983, Harris and Gordon 1987). As summarized in Table 2,
there are two extant museum collections (FMNH 59219 and NMNH 160736), both from
the Spring River at Hardy, Sharp County. An additional collection is reported from the
South Fork Spring River near Salem, Fulton County and voucher specimens from the A.J.
Brown private collection are housed at the Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences,
University of Arkansas Collections, Fayetteville.
Epioblasma florentina curtisii has also been reported from the South Fork Spring River at
Fulton County Road 61 west of Saddle, AR (Freida Schilling, personal communication).
The sighting was in the late 1970s prior to construction of the new County Road bridge in
1983. Apparently there are no voucher specimens for this location as the Schilling
collection was donated to the Field Museum of Natural History at Chicago, and there
were no E. florentina curtisii from this site (J. Gerber, Curator, FMNH, personal
communication).
A fourth previously reported site is “Black River at the mouth of the Spring River”,
Lawrence-Randolph County with specimens collected and illustrated by J. M. Bates and
S. D. Dennis (Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1983, 1984). Attempts to locate these
specimens have been unsuccessful, and there is some concern as to whether this site
represents a valid record of Epioblasma florentina curtisii. The Recovery Plan for E.
florentina curtisii (U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1986, p. 5) alludes to the fact that
these Black River specimens are not E. florentina curtisii. M. E. Gordon (personal
communication) believes these specimens to represent E. capsaeformis, a species
restricted to the Tennessee River system, and the reported Black River location the result
of accidental label switching for the field collection data.
Final Report Page 29
Final Report Page 30
Final Report Page 31
No Epioblasma florentina curtisii have been reported from Arkansas since the early
1980s, and none were encountered during this survey. However, additional locations and
numerous fresh-dead and several live specimens of E. triquetra have recently been
encountered. Matthews (2007) recorded the first occurrence of E. triquetra from the
Buffalo River. Two additional sites were found on the Spring River where numerous
fresh dead individuals were found in muskrat middens and up to five live individuals
were found during survey efforts. These discoveries of E. triquetra in numbers and at
sites never before found leave hope that E. florentina curtisii may still be present in
Arkansas.
There are several sites on the Strawberry, South Fork Spring, and Spring rivers that
should be monitored and resurveyed over a continuum of years. A statewide freshwater
mussel monitoring plan is being formulated by the AGFC and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service that will incorporate additional repeated monitoring at five year intervals for
specific high diversity, high density mussel aggregations from river and stream systems
across each of the Level IV ecoregions within Arkansas. Specific sites in the study area
recommended for inclusion in a statewide monitoring plan are Strawberry River sites 97-
6, 96-11, and 06-14; Spring River sites 04-07, 04-09, 05-07, and 05-09; and South Fork
Spring River sites 01-04, 02-01, and 02-02. Buffalo National River personnel and
Arkansas State University are planning to implement a similar monitoring agenda at 12
sites scattered along the length of the river (Matthews 2007).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Chris Davidson, Mark Gordon, Waylon Hiler, Randy Hoeh, Christian Hutson, Kelly
Irwin, Holly Martin, Mickey Matthews, Emy Monroe, Susan Rogers Oetker, Andy Peck,
Bill Posey, Andy Roberts, Josh Seagraves, Sara Seagraves, and Ben Wheeler provided
assistance in the field. Dr. Jochen Gerber provided information regarding the Schilling
Collection at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago.
Susan Rogers Oetker initiated efforts to secure funding and, Chris Davidson and Andy
Roberts administered grant monies from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Final Report Page 32
LITERATURE CITED
ADEQ. 2004. Arkansas’ 2004 list of impaired waterbodies. Water Division, Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality, Little Rock. 19 p.
Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. 1984. Relocation of the pink
mucket pearly mussel (Lampsilis orbiculata) in the Spring River near Ravenden,
Lawrence County, Arkansas. Report submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Endangered Species Office, Jackson, MS. 9 pp.
Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. 1987. Survey of mussels
(Pelecypoda: Unionidae) in the White River at the proposed Arkansas Highway 58
bridge near Guion, Arkansas. Environmental Division, Little Rock, AR. 8 pp.
Bruendermann, S. A., J. S. Faiman, and A. C. Buchanan. 2001. Survey for the Curtis
pearly mussel, Epioblasma florentina curtisii (Utterback 1914) and other mussel
species in the Little Black River, Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation,
Fisheries and Wildlife Research Center, Columbia, MO. 23 p.
Butler, R. S. 2007. Status assessment report for the snuffbox, Epioblasma triquetra,
a freshwater mussel occurring in the Mississippi River and Great Lakes Basins.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, NC. 212 p.
Call, R. E. 1895. A study of the Unionidae of Arkansas, with incidental references to
their distribution in the Mississippi Valley. Trans. Acad. Sci. St. Louis 7:1-65.
Christian, A. D. 1995. Analysis of the commercial mussel beds in the Cache and White
rivers in Arkansas. M.S. thesis, Dept. Biological Sciences, Arkansas State
University, State University, AR. 197 p.
Clarke, A. H. 1985. Mussel (naiad) study: St. Francis and White rivers. Final Report
(Contract No. DACW66-84-M-1666-R), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis
District. 28 pp.
Clarke, A. H. 1987. Status survey of Lampsilis streckeri Frierson (1927) and Arcidens
wheeleri (Ortmann and Walker, 1912). Ecosearch, Inc., Final report to the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Jackson, MS. 24 p + Appendix.
Dames and Moore. 1977. Mussel populations in the White River near the Independence
Steam Electric Station site. Arkansas Power and Light Co., Little Rock. 10 pp.
Final Report Page 33
Davidson, C. L., G. L. Harp, and J. L. Harris. 1997. A survey of Mollusca (Bivalvia: Unionacea) inhabiting Myatt Creek, Fulton County, Arkansas. J. Arkansas Acad. Sci. Vol. 51:193-196.
DeLorme. 2004. Topo USA, Version 5.0. Innovative Earthmate GPS, Mapping
Software, GIS Solutions, and Data. Yarmouth, ME.
Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1983. Mussel (naiad) survey: St. Francis, White, and Cache
rivers, Arkansas and Missouri. Final Report (Contract No. DACW66-78-C-0147),
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District. 89 pp.
Ecological Consultants, Inc. 1984. Handbook of the mussels of the St. Francis, White
and Cache rivers, Arkansas and Missouri. Supplement to the Final Report
(Contract No. DACW66-78-C-0147), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis
District. 62 pp.
Frierson, L. S. 1927. A classified and annotated checklist of the North American
naiades. Baylor Univ. Press, Waco, Texas. 111 p. and Errata et Corrigenda,
letterpress.
Gordon, M. E. 1980a. Freshwater Mollusca of the Elk River, White River above Beaver
Reservoir, and Frog Bayou drainages of the southwestern Ozarks. M. S. thesis,
University of Arkansas. 350 p.
Gordon, M. E. 1980b. Recent Mollusca of Arkansas with annotations to systematics and
zoogeography. Proc. AR Acad. Sci.Vol. XXXIV:58-62.
Gordon, M. E. 1982. Mollusca of the White River, Arkansas and Missouri. SW Nat.
27(3):347-352.
Gordon, M. E., P. A. Durkee, H. M. Runke, and H. J. Zimmerman. 1984. Mussel fauna
of the Black and Spring rivers in northeastern Arkansas. Final report prepared for
Permits Branch, Little Rock District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock,
AR. 27 p.
Gordon, M. E. and J. L. Harris. 1983. Distribution and status of fourteen species of
freshwater mussels considered rare or endangered in Arkansas. Arkansas Natural
Heritage Commission, Little Rock. Project #G6301. 23 pp. + appendices I-II.
Gordon, M. E., L. R. Kraemer, and A. V. Brown. 1980. Unionacea of Arkansas:
historical review, checklist, and observations on distributional patterns. Bull. Am.
Malacol. Union, Inc. 1979:31-37.
Final Report Page 34
Harris, J. L. 1991. Survey for Lampsilis streckeri in the Middle Fork Little Red River at
the proposed NOARK pipeline crossing, Van Buren County, Arkansas. Prepared
for ENSR Consulting and Engineering, Houston, TX. 10 p.
Harris, J. L. 1992a. Status of Lampsilis streckeri in segments of the Middle, South, and
Archey forks of the Little Red River, Stone and Van Buren Counties, Arkansas.
Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Office,
Jackson, MS. 23 p. + field notes.
Harris, J. L. 1992b. Temporary relocation of the speckled pocketbook (Lampsilis
streckeri) at the NOARK pipeline crossing, Middle Fork Little Red River, Van
Buren County, Arkansas. Prepared for ENSR Consulting and Engineering,
Houston, TX. 10 p. + Appendix.
Harris, J. L. 1993. Habitat characterization and species associates of the speckled
pocketbook (Lampsilis streckeri Frierson) in the Middle Fork Little Red River,
Arkansas. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species
Office, Jackson, MS. 28 p. + Appendices.
Harris, J. L. 1994. Mussel survey of the White River between river miles 260.0 - 264.0
in Independence and Jackson counties, Arkansas. Prepared for Mobley
Construction Co., Inc., Morrilton, AR. 11 p.
Harris, J. L. 1995. Mussel survey of the White River between river miles 264.0 - 274.0
near Oil Trough, Independence County, Arkansas. Prepared for Mobley
Construction Co., Inc., Morrilton, AR. 14 p.
Harris, J. L. 1996. The freshwater mussel resources of the Buffalo National River,
Arkansas: Phase I qualitative survey: Location, species composition and status of
mussel beds. Prepared for the U.S.D.I., Buffalo National River, Harrison, AR. 19
p. + Appendices.
Harris, J. L. 1999. Status of aquatic resources: aquatic animals and their habitats:
diversity of mussels in U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Ozark-
Ouachita Highlands Assessment: aquatic conditions. Report 3 of 5. Gen. Tech.
Rep. SRS-33. Ashville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Southern Research Station. 317 p.
Harris, J. L. 2002. Freshwater mussel survey of the White River and Lafferty Creek,
Arkansas in the vicinities of Lock and Dam 1, Lock and Dam 2, and Lock and
Dam 3. Prepared for Crist Engineers, Inc., Little Rock, AR. 14 p. + Appendix A
(field data sheets).
Final Report Page 35
Harris, J. L. and A. D. Christian. 2005. Survey for mussels and the Ozark hellbender in
the vicinity of the proposed Northeast Arkansas Public Water Authority water
treatment plant, Lawrence and Randolph counties, Arkansas. Final Report
prepared for Crist Engineers, Inc., Little Rock, AR. 8 p.
Harris, J. L. and M. E. Gordon. 1987. Distribution and status of rare and endangered
mussels (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas. Proceedings
Arkansas Academy of Science 41(1987):49-56.
Harris, J. L. and M. E. Gordon. 1990. Arkansas Mussels. Arkansas Game and Fish
Commission, Little Rock, AR. 32 p.
Harris, J. L., P. J. Rust, A. D. Christian, W. R. Posey, II, C. L. Davidson, and G. L. Harp.
1997. Revised status of rare and endangered Unionacea (Mollusca:
Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas. J. AR Acad. Sci. 51:66-89.
Harris, J. L. and W. K. Welch. 1985. Endangered mussel survey: Spring River at
Mammoth Springs, Fulton County, Arkansas. 3 p.
Hinkley, A. A. 1916. New freshwater shells from the Ozark Mountains. Proc. U. S.
National Mus. 49:587-589
Johnson, R. I. 1978. Systematics and zoogeography of Plagiola (= Dysnomia =
Epioblasma), an almost extinct genus of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
from middle North America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 148(6):239-321.
Johnson, R. I. 1980. Zoogeography of North American Unionacea (Mollusca:Bivalvia)
north of the maximum pleistocene glaciation. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 149(2):77-
189.
Jones, J. W., R. J. Neves, S. A. Ahlstedt, and E. M. Hallerman. 2006. A holistic
approach to taxonomic evaluation of two closely related endangered freshwater
mussel species, the oyster mussel Epioblasma capsaeformis and tan riffleshell
Epioblasma florentina walkeri (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J. Molluscan Studies (2006)
72:267-283.
Matthews, M. W. 2007. Freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) assemblages structure
and their role in nutrient recycling along an Ozark river. M. S. Thesis, Dept. of
Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR.
Meek, S. E. and H. W. Clark. 1912. The mussels of the Big Buffalo Fork of the White
River, Arkansas. U. S. Bureau of Fisheries Document 759:1-20.
Final Report Page 36
Miller, A. C. and P. D. Hartfield. 1986. A survey for live mussels in the Black and
Spring rivers, Arkansas, 1985. Misc. Paper EL-86-7, U. S. Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 13 p., 9 Tables, 11 Figs.
Miller, A. C. and D. A. Nelson. 1984. A survey for mussels on the Black and Spring
rivers, Arkansas 16-17 November 1983. U. S. Army Engineers, Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 9 p.
Oesch, R. D. 1995. Missouri naiads: a guide to the mussels of Missouri. Missouri Dept.
of Conservation, Jefferson City. 271 p.
Rust, P. J. 1993. Analysis of the commercial mussel beds in the Black, Spring,
Strawberry and Current rivers in Arkansas. M.S. thesis, Dept. Biological
Sciences, Arkansas State University, State University, AR. 118 p.
Stansbery, D. H. 1971. Rare and endangered mollusks in the eastern United States, pp.
5-18, in S. E. Jorgensen and R. Sharp, editors Proceedings of a symposium on rare
and endangered mollusks (naiads) of the U. S. Sport Fish and Wildlife, Dept. of
the Interior, Region 3, Twin Cities, MN. 79 p.
Trauth, S. E., B. A Wheeler, W. R. Hiler, R. L. Lawson, H. C. Martin, and A. D.
Christian. 2007. Current distribution and relative abundance of the crayfish,
mussels, and aquatic salamanders of the Spring River, Arkansas. Final Report to
the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Benton, AR. 87 p.
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons,
P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A.
Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common
and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada:
mollusks, 2nd
edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 26,
Bethesda, Maryland. 526 p.
U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986. Curtis’ pearly mussel recovery plan. U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities, MN. 92 p.
Utterback, W. I. 1915-1916. The naiades of Missouri. Am. Midland Nat. 4:1-29, 41-53,
97-152, 181-204, 244-273 (1915); 311-327, 339-354, 387-400, 432-464 (1916).
Wheeler, H. E. 1914. The unione fauna of Cache River, with description of a new
Fusconaia from Arkansas. Nautilus 28:73-78.
Wheeler, H. E. 1918. The Mollusca of Clark County, Arkansas. Nautilus 31:109-125.
Final Report Page 37
Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993.
Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada.
Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
Winterringer, R. 2003. Population dynamics and reproductive patterns of the federally
endangered freshwater mussel, Lampsilis streckeri (Frierson 1927). Master of
Science Thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University,
Jonesboro, AR. 74 pp. + appendices A-F.
Appendix I
Field Data Sheets
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 1
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 2
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 3
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 4
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 5
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 6
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 7
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 8
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 9
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 10
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 11
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 12
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 13
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 14
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 15
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 16
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 17
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 18
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 19
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 20
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 21
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 22
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 23
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 24
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 25
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 26
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 27
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 28
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 29
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 30
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 31
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 32
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 33
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 34
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 35
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 36
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 37
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 38
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 39
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 40
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 41
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 42
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 43
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 44
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 45
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 46
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 47
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 48
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 49
Appendix I – Field Data Sheets Page 50
Appendix II
Spring River Quantitative Survey Results
Trauth et al. 2007
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 1
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 2
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 3
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 4
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 5
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 6
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 7
Appendix II – Survey Results Page 8