“Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

27
“Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region” Hugh Govan LMMA Network

description

“Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”. Hugh Govan LMMA Network. Content. Based on SPREP/WWF review of regional progress and LMMA annual reports Overview of history and status Characteristics Lessons and challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Page 1: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

“Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Hugh Govan

LMMA Network

Page 2: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Content

• Based on SPREP/WWF review of regional progress and LMMA annual reports

• Overview of history and status

• Characteristics

• Lessons and challenges

• Potential for CEAFM or EBM

Page 3: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”
Page 4: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Evolution of LMMAs and objectives

To protect the nesting ground and rookery of the Hawksbill and other sea turtles in the Arnavon Islands. (AMCA)

Traditional purposes /food allocation

Fisheries management /Livelihoods

Conservation

Biodiversity

Harvest tabu area when fish are plentiful (Vanuatu)

Ceremonial or Kastom purposes (Vanuatu, Fiji )

To manage and protect the inshore area to help increase the amount of resources (Tonga)

Locally Managed Marine Areas

Support agencies(up to 1990s)

Support agencies(since 1990s)

Pre-1900s

Page 5: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Local or internal

Global or external

S P E C T R U M OF O B J E C T I V E S

To protect the nesting ground and rookery of the Hawksbill and other sea turtles in the Arnavon Islands. (AMCA)

Traditional purposes /food allocation

Fisheries management /Livelihoods

Conservation

Biodiversity

Harvest tabu area when fish are plentiful(Vanuatu)

Ceremonial or Kastom purposes(Vanuatu, Fiji )

To manage and protect the inshore area to help increase the amount of resources (Tonga)

Locally Managed Marine Areas

Support agencies(up to 1990s)

Support agencies(since 1990s)

Page 6: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Courtesy of M. Mills, JCU

Page 7: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Inventory of Marine Managed Areas in Pacific Countries

EEZ Area(km²)

Territorial Waters (TW)(km²)

Number of active

MMAs / tabus

Active MMA coverage

(km²)

% of EEZ under

management

% of TW under

management

Cook Islands 1,830,000 31,314 24 19 0.001 0.06Fiji 1,290,000 114,464 217 10,880 0.8 9.5Papua New Guinea 3,120,000 355,699 86 59 0.002 0.02

Samoa 120,000 9,995 54 209 0.2 2.1Solomon Islands 1,340,000 140,038 113 941 0.07 0.7

Tonga 700,000 37,526 6 93 0.01 0.2Tuvalu 900,000 18,975 4 76 0.008 0.4Vanuatu 680,000 69,169 20 89 0.01 0.1Marshall Islands

2,131,000 106,994 1 701 0.03 0.7

Kiribati 3,600,000 75,300 14 3,054* 0.08 4Federated States of Micronesia

2,980,000 49,992 12 23 0.0008 0.05

Palau 601,000 14,007 28 1,126 0.2 8

TOTAL 19,292,000 1,023,473 579 17,270 0.09 1.7*This estimation excludes the Phoenix Island Protected Area that comprises 408,250 km² making 11% of the EEZ under management once the management plan and endowment will be finalized.

Page 8: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Inventory of Marine Managed Areas in Pacific Territories

EEZ Area(km²)

Territorial Waters (TW)

(km²)

Number of MMAs

Active MMA coverage

% of EEZ under

management

% of TW under

management

American Samoa 390,000 9,910 19 174 0.04 1.8

French Polynesia 5,030,000 243,885 10 2,837 0.06 1.2

New Caledonia1,740,000 68,865 20 16,188* 0.9 23

Niue 390,000 2,983 3 31 0.008 1Tokelau 290,000 6,999 3 1 0.0003 0.01Wallis and Futuna 300,000 5,686 0 0 0 0

Guam 218,000 4,575 11 170 0.08 3.7Northern Marianas 1,823.000 27,217 8 13 0.0007 0.05

TOTAL 10,181,000 370,120 74 19,414 0.2 5.2

* Including World Heritage core marine areas declared in 2008 comprising 15,743 km² and excluding the buffer zone of 12,871 km².

Page 9: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Roviana, Solomon Islands

What are these marine managed areas like?

Page 10: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Traditional declaration of a tabu in Vanuatu (with pig killing)

Community planning, Tuvalu

Fishing reserve (tabu), Solomon Islands

Sa - (No-take zones) in Safata MPA, Samoa

Most are community conserved areas or LMMAS

Page 11: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Many are performing adaptive management in which communities identify problems, examine options,

implement actions and evaluate

Page 12: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

The same adaptive management process can be use for integrated management,

disaster preparedness, adaptation and other community development purposes

Paunagisu, Marou and Anelgehaut in Vanuatu have watershed and development plans integrated in their “MPA plan”

Page 13: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

What are the sizes of tabu? (n=78)

1 1 12

25

6

27

15

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

200-50 50-25 25-10 10-5 5-1 1-0.5 0.5-0.1 0.1 >

Km2

…and the tabus may be periodically opened.

No-take zones or tabus are smalle.g. Solomon Islands

Page 14: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Importance of social networks

• Traditional ties and neighbouring communities (trickle down)

• Government sponsored e.g. Fisheries or Environment department in Samoa

• Provincial or district (e.g. Kadavu, GERUSA)• National multi-stakeholder e.g. FLMMA,

SILMMA, PNG-LMMA• Regional NGOs e.g. WWF, TNC, FSPI• Regional mixed e.g. LMMA network, PIMPAC,

MIC

Page 15: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

The Locally Managed Marine Area Network (LMMA)

Page 16: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

FLMMA

SILMMA

ILMMA

PLMMA

PNGCLMA

LMMA Network MembersLMMA Country Networks

Page 17: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Site members of the LMMA Network 2009

Country

Total No. of LMMAs

No. of Villag

es

No. of Tools/ MPAs

LMMA Area (sq km)

Tool/MPA Area (sq. km)

# of Manage-ment Plans

Legally Gazette

d

Fiji 250 388 235 10,745

467 208 1

Indonesia 16 11 16 696.98

34 16 8

Palau 5 11 7 n/a 221.23

1 5

Pohnpei 7 4 7 64 15 7 7

Papua New Guinea

12 14 37 512.73

512.73

9 4

Philippines 30 36 30 166 14 30 0

Solomon Islands

74 148 125 249 151 60 0

Vanuatu 26 27 18 290 1 5 1

Totals 420 639 475 12,725

1,416 336 26

Page 18: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Courtesy of M. Mills, JCU

Page 19: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Kadavu Yaubula Management Support

Team

A. Tawake

Page 20: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Kadavu Yaubula Management Support

Team

A. Tawake

Page 21: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

What are some of the reported benefits?

• Biodiversity (increases in tabu areas)• Increased resource harvests (harder to measure)• Information, awareness and capacity• Food security – predictable supply • Governance and conflict management• Community organization• Resilience and adaptation• Health• Strengthen resource rights, respect, tenure…• Cultural recovery/survival• Integrated resource management• An excellent basis for Integrated Island Management

/ ICZM??

Biodiversity (increases in tabu areas)

Increased resource harvests (harder to measure)

Page 22: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Some key issues• Define new roles: Government/external

agencies’ role is support, coordination and technical advice rather than “command and control” – define new governance roles and multi-sector partnerships. NGOs..?

• Go to scale and beyond MPAs: Huge potential of tenure systems for integrated or ecosystem based management owing to land and sea tenure – building block of resource management

• Long term sustainability: External costs kept very low as community provides main inputs – beware “incentives” – sustainable use is the key driver

• The potential is very good AND little alternative approaches demonstrated

Page 23: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”
Page 24: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Country Site/project Cost/site Cost/km2 Cost/km2 No TakeZone

Samoa Village Fisheries Management Programme (VFMP) 1,344 1,862 5,795

Samoa Aleipata MPA 6,500 - 16,000 179 - 360

2,339 – 8,394

Samoa Safata MPA 6,500 - 19,000 179 - 534

2,339 – 4,471

Solomon Islands WFC, Isabel and Western Province 3,000 ~100 3,500

Solomon Islands WWF, Western Province 16,000/MPA 5,000/NTZ

2,900

Solomon Islands FSPI, Malaita, Gela, Guadalcanal 1,851 - 2,569 4,634 - 6,432

Solomon Islands TNC, Arnavon Islands 20,000 125 125

Vanuatu FSPV 5,537 2,187

Cook Islands WWF 5,000-10,000 15,000-30,000

Fiji Daku 478 81 166

Fiji Nasau 938 158 171

Fiji Navakavu 725 39 247

Fiji 170 IAS FLMMA sites 800 14.6 265.8

Fiji Waitabu 3,000 12,000

PNG CFMDP, Morobe and Kavieng 3,800

Support costs can be low (yearly avg)

Page 25: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Major costs are staff and transport e.g. FSPI Solomon Islands

Personnel

TravelWorkshops/Training

Office/field equipment and

admin

Communications

External Technical support

Government support

National network support

Page 26: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Potential for taking these experiences forward as a national approach would depend on being:

• Designed to fully integrate into government functions over the medium term (applies to Melanesia),

• Decentralized into logistically functional management areas (provinces or similar),

• Cost effectiveness to improve the likelihood of sustainable financing within government budgets or from donors / all of government approach (DRM, CCA, ICM)

• Phased or cumulative approach optimizing trickle down or snowballing effects. 1000’s of communities..

• Simple but strategic overview and non-burdensome data collection to enable the ongoing identification of gaps (objectives, species, habitats, coverage and so on).

Page 27: “Status and potential of locally-managed marine areas in the South Pacific Island Region”

Sources and reference:• Govan et al*. 2009. Status and potential of

locally-managed marine areas in the Pacific Island Region. SPREP/WWF/ Reefbase/CRISP

• LMMA annual reports www.lmmanetwork.org

Munda, Solomon Islands

* Et al. = Contributions from Alifereti Tawake, Kesaia Tabunakawai, Aaron Jenkins, Antoine Lasgorceix, Ann-Maree Schwarz, Bill Aalbersberg, Bruno Manele, Caroline Vieux, Dan Afzal, Delvene Notere, Erika Techera, Eroni Tulala Rasalato, Helen Sykes, Hugh Walton, Hugo Tafea, Isoa Korovulavula, James Comley, Jeff Kinch, Jess Feehely, Julie Petit, Louise Heaps, Paul Anderson, Pip Cohen, Pulea Ifopo, Ron Vave, Roy Hills, Seini Tawakelevu, Semese Alefaio, Semese Meo, Shauna Troniak, Suzie Kukuian, Sylvia George, Tevi Maltali.