Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison
description
Transcript of Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison
![Page 1: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Christine Chilaka
Leslie Aranda
Nancy Acosta
AP Statistics
Period 4
6/6/2011
Hollister Vs. Kmartwhich shall prevail?
![Page 2: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Does name brand clothing influence a consumer’s
choice of t-shirt?
Ho: There is no association between name brand and T-shirt preference
Ha: There is an association between name brand and T-shirt preference
X² test for independence
α = .1
![Page 3: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Conditions are met√Random
√Independent
√Normal
20 students of each class were randomly selected
The population of students is at least 800
The expected count of each cell is greater then 5
Expected Count
K mart Hollister
Seniors 10.75 9.25
Juniors 10.75 9.25
Sophomores 10.75 9.25
Freshmen 10.75 9.25
![Page 4: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Stratified random sample
n=8020 freshmen
20 sophomores20 juniors 20 seniors
![Page 5: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
K mart Hollister Total
Seniors 12 (.15) 8 (.10) 20
Juniors 9 (.113) 11 (.136)
20
Sophomores
13 (.163) 7 (.088) 20
Freshmen 9 (.113) 11 (.136)
20
Total 43 37 80
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
K martHollister
Seniors Juniors Soph Fresh
Which shirt do you prefer?
![Page 6: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Chi squared Test for Independence
p = .4638
![Page 7: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Conclusion
p-value > αFail to reject Ho
![Page 8: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Potential errors?
Influence by peersNot caring
![Page 9: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Recommendations?
![Page 10: Stats Project (1) T-Shirt Comparison](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083002/558ce435d8b42a87628b457f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Appendix