· FLORIDA KEYS 2 • FEBRUAR Y 20-26, 2020 X Continued on page 4 KEY LARGO 305-451-5700 MM 99 Median
Statistical Summary ATM 305 – 12 November 2015. Review of Primary Statistics Mean Median Mode x i...
-
Upload
claud-haynes -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Statistical Summary ATM 305 – 12 November 2015. Review of Primary Statistics Mean Median Mode x i...
Statistical Summary
ATM 305 – 12 November 2015
Review of Primary Statistics
• Mean
• Median
• Mode
xi - scalar quantityN - number of observations
Value at the 50% cumulative frequency distribution
Ex - 8, 25, 35, 60, 85, 90, 115, 200, 82550% 50%
Maximum (or maxima) value of a distributionMultiple modes possible (maxima)
y
x
mode
Wind• Mean wind speed
– Mean speed determined without consideration of direction of wind
• Mean resultant wind- vector wind
To calculate it is necessary to compute the individual ui and vi wind components, average them separately, and recombine and to get the mean vector wind.
Note the differences between mathematical wind direction and meteorological wind direction
SW wind
Let = meteorological wind direction= 225o
= 45o
= 270o –
= 270o –
Wind• Mean resultant wind (cont.)
Using mathematical wind direction
Mean
Wind• Mean resultant wind (cont.)
Using meteorological wind direction
Resultant Wind Speed Resultant Wind Direction
Mean
Note Changes
Wind• Mean resultant wind (cont.)
To get meteorological wind direction right, necessary to check individual coordinates
u
v> 0
> 0
> 0
< 0
< 0
> 0
< 0
< 0
a) > 0 and > 0 (SW winds)
b) < 0 and < 0 (NE winds)c) > 0 and < 0 (NW winds)
d) < 0 and > 0 (SE winds)
e) = 0 and > 0 (S winds)
f) = 0 and < 0 (N winds)g) > 0 and = 0 (W winds)
h) < 0 and = 0 (E winds)
a)
b)
c)
d)
= 180o
= 0o
= 270o
= 90o
Wind• Mean resultant wind (cont.)
Resultant wind speed is smaller than average speed of individual winds
The mean wind speed (NOT resultant wind) determines mean evaporation, cooling power, and boundary layer turbulence
Example: 10 wind measurements
5 northerly wind measurements, each at 10 kt5 southerly wind measurements, each at 10 kt
What is the mean wind speed, and resultant wind speed?
= (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0) / 10 = 0
= (-10) + (-10) + (-10) + (-10) + (-10) + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10) / 10 = 0
mean wind speed = (10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10) / 10 = 10 kt
resultant wind speed
= 0 kt
Wind• Wind Persistence (“steadiness”)
P = 1 Winds always blows from the same direction (resultant wind and mean wind speed are equal) P = 0 Wind is unsteady and blowing from all directions
Standard Deviation
Sometimes denoted by sigma,
Note:
Variance:
Note: some texts when N is large replace N with (N – 1)
Both the standard deviation and variance measure the spread of a large sample of data
Simply the square of standard deviation
Mean AnomalyIndividual Value
• Standardizing anomalies allows us to compare anomalous values in different parts of the globe
• Can be thought of as a measure of distance in standard deviation units of a value from its mean
All that is needed is a mean and standard deviation and you can find the standardized anomaly of a variable
Anomaly
Standard Deviation
Individual Value
Mean of that value
Example: standardized anomalies of 500-hPa geopotential heights
See Link:
• Can now directly compare low heights over midwestern US to high heights over east Pacific
• Standard deviation of heights relatively low in tropics, but relatively high in mid-latitudes
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=atl&pkg=z500a_sd&
Anomalies
Standardized Anomalies
Standardized Anomalies
• Standardizing anomalies allows us to compare anomalous values in different parts of the globe
• Can be thought of as a measure of distance in standard deviation units of a value from its mean
All that is needed is a mean and standard deviation and you can find the standardized anomaly of a variable
Standardizing a dataset results in a mean = 0 and a standard deviation = 1
Anomaly
Standard Deviation
Individual Value
Mean of that value
Example: standardized anomalies of 500-hPa geopotential heights
• Can now directly compare low heights over midwestern US to high heights over east Pacific
• Standard deviation of heights relatively low in tropics, but relatively high in mid-latitudes
See Link: http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=atl&pkg=z500a_sd&
Standardized anomalies
Standardized Anomalies
• Southern Oscillation Index (SOI)
Additional applications of standardized anomalies
Teleconnection that measures the standardized monthly sea level pressure difference between Tahiti and Darwin, Australia
Often used as a proxy for ENSO- Positive SOI corresponds to La Nina like conditions- Negative SOI corresponds to El Nino like conditions
Link: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/enso/indicators/soi/
El Nino
La Nina
Normal Distribution• Also known as a Gaussian distribution or “bell curve”
Amplitude
Standard Deviation
-2 -1 0 1 2
Only 2.5% of distribution
most meteorological variables have normal distributions
- Temperature, Geopotential Height(these fields are good to “standardize”)
Some meteorological variables DO NOT have normal distributions
- Precipitation, precipitable water, windspeed
68%
95%
Cumulative Frequency Distributions• Depicts the cumulative total of a variable over time
CumulativePrecipitation
Normal precipitation
Time
Jan 1 Dec 31
Below Normal
Above Normal
Daily Precipitation
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/global_monitoring/precipitation/global_precip_accum.shtml
URL to CFD plots from Climate Prediction Center:
Pearson (Ordinary) CorrelationCorrelation measures the strength of a linear relationship between 2 variables
Alternative Computational Form (useful if you don’t have standardized anomalies)
Note: -1 ≤ rxy ≤ 1-1,+1 Indicates perfect linear association between the two variables0 Indicates no linear relationship between the two variables
Pearson (Ordinary) CorrelationPlot Examples
Y va
riabl
e
X variable X variable X variable
Y va
riabl
e
Y va
riabl
er ≈ 0r = 1 r = -1
Note: even if there is no linear relationship, a strong non-linear relationship can exist!
IMPORTANT: Correlation can suggest causation, pending a physical explanation of the relationship, but it can NEVER, by itself, imply causation!
Simple Linear RegressionLet some variable x be the independent or predictor variable (i.e., SSTs)Let some variable y be the dependent or predictand variable (i.e., # of TCs)- A linear regression procedure chooses the line producing the least
error for predictions of y given x, using a least squares approach
- Linear regression can be used to predict linear changes in variables, and is often an important component of statistical models.
- In calculus we write a line as:- Stasticians write line as:
y-intercept slope
Use this form if you already know correlation coefficient
see youtube video explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEEJNz0RK4QCool visualization of least squares approach
http://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/least-squares-regression/latest/least-squares-regression_en.html
Simple Linear RegressionSimple example
xi yi
-2 0-1 00 11 12 3 -2 -1 0 1 2
0
1
2
3
4
X-AxisY-
Axi
sxi*yi xi
2
0 40 10 01 16 4
- Sum these values
- Solve for b
= 0.7b
Simple Linear RegressionSimple example
xi yi
-2 0-1 00 11 12 3 -2 -1 0 1 2
0
1
2
3
4
X-AxisY-
Axi
sxi*yi xi
2
0 40 10 01 16 4
- Sum these values
- Solve for a
= 1
Correlation and Regression Maps
Available on NOAA ESRL Map Room: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/
Correlation
Example: Correlation of NAO with 500-hPa geopotential heights
Strong negative correlation
NAO
500-
hPa
Hgt r = -0.8
More positiveMore negative
Low
HighAt each grid point in Northern Hemisphere
Coast of Greenland
Correlation and Regression Maps
Available on NOAA ESRL Map Room: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/
Correlation
Example: Correlation of NAO with 500-hPa geopotential heights
Moderate positive correlation
NAO50
0-hP
a H
gt
r = +0.6
More positiveMore negative
Low
High
At each grid point in Northern Hemisphere Eastern US
Correlation and Regression Maps
Available on NOAA ESRL Map Room: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/
Correlation
Example: Correlation of NAO with 500-hPa geopotential heights
No Correlation
NAO50
0-hP
a H
gt
r = ≈ 0
More positiveMore negative
Low
High
At each grid point in Northern Hemisphere
Central Pacific
Correlation and Regression Maps
Available on NOAA ESRL Map Room: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/
Regression
Example: Regression of NAO with 500-hPa geopotential heights
At each grid point in Northern Hemisphere
Note that Regression and Correlations maps show the same features, but amplitude of regression much greater than correlation which must be between -1 to 1
NAO
500-
hPa
Hgt
More positiveMore negative
Low
HighCoast of Greenland
regression line: Amplitude (≈ -60 m)
Simplified Statistical Summary PlotsBox and Whisker Display
Max
Upper quartile
Min
Lower quartile
MedianBoxWhiskers
Simplified Statistical Summary PlotsHistogram
Bins (amounts)
# of
eve
nts
0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40