Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology

11
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology Polina Golland

description

Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology. Polina Golland. Statistical Models of Anatomy. Applications Spatial priors for segmentation Population studies Traditional approach Align images to a common template Compute mean and co-variation Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology

Page 1: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

NA-MICNational Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Statistical Models of Anatomy and Pathology

Polina Golland

Page 2: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Statistical Models of Anatomy

• Applications – Spatial priors for segmentation– Population studies

• Traditional approach– Align images to a common template– Compute mean and co-variation

• Challenges– Spatial variability in the structure of interest– Loss of detail– Heterogeneous populations

Page 3: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Our Solutions

• Use training data in novel ways– handle spatial variability

• TBI, tumors– avoid the loss of detail

• Atrial Fibrillation, Huntington’s, Alzheimer’s

• Model heterogeneous populations– capture broader variability

• Atrial fibrillation, radiation therapy, Alzheimer’s

• Related topics– Registration (Guido Gerig)– Interactive segmentation (Allen Tannenbaum)

Page 4: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Spatial Priors and Pathology

• Augmented generative model– Atlas: spatial prior for healthy tissues– Estimate: spatial prior for tumor

• Output– Common healthy tissue segmentation– Modality-specific tumor segmentation

Menze, MICCAI 2010

Page 5: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Spatial Priors and Pathology (cont’d)

• More accurate than EM-segmentation with outlier detection

• Comparable to within-rater variability

• Going forward: TBI

Menze, MICCAI 2010

Page 6: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Label Fusion Segmentation

Test Image

Subject Specific Label Prior

New Segmentation

PairwiseRegistration

Training Data

Page 7: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Generative Model for Label Fusion

{Ln} {In}

L(x) I(x)

M

Test image

Training images

……

?

nnLILILpL ,|,maxargˆ

Sabuncu, TMI 2010

Page 8: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Left Atrium Segmentation

• More accurate than baseline methods• Correctly identified all veins• Local prior for scar location

Weighted fusionMajorityManual Parametric

Depa, MICCAI Workshop 2010

Page 9: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Modeling Heterogeneous Populations

• Manifold of anatomical images– Spectral embedding– Statistical model in new space– Gerber, MedIA 2010

• Collection of sub-populations – Mixture model– Templates represent population– Sabuncu TMI 2009

noise

Page 10: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Applications for Spatial Priors

• Identify relevant “neighborhood” for the new image– A (small) set of training examples– A (local) atlas template

• Construct patient-specific spatial prior– Average or use label fusion

• Challenges:– Reduce the number of pairwise registration steps– Model influence of selected neighborhood on new image

Page 11: Statistical Models                of Anatomy and Pathology

National Alliance for Medical Image Computing http://na-mic.org

Conclusions

• Clear need for new methods– Handle spatial variability of pathology– Handle anatomical variability in a population

• Preliminary results: local models– In the image coordinates– In the space of images

• Going forward– Development in the context of the DBPs