Statement of Work For Engineering Services...Statement of Work for Engineering Services RFP No....

Statement of Work for Engineering Services RFP No. 330237, Rev. 0

Project L-839, 12-in. Potable Water Loop-Line to WTP

of 37

Updated January 9, 2018

Statement of Work

For

Engineering Services

Title: Engineering Services for Project L-839, 12-in. Potable Water Loop-Line to Waste

Treatment Plant (WTP)

Date: July 29, 2019

Revision Number: 0



of 37


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction / Background......................................................................................... 4

2.0 Objective .................................................................................................................... 4

3.0 Description of Work - Specific ................................................................................... 4

3.1 Task 1 – 30% Design Package............................................................................. 5



3.4 Task 4 – 100% Final Design Package .................................................................. 6

3.5 Task 5 – Engineering Support to Construction (Bid Option) ................................. 7

3.6 Task 6 – Testing / Startup / Commissioning (Bid Option) ..................................... 8

3.6.1 Testing Documentation .................................................................................... 8

3.6.2 Operations and Maintenance Manuals .............................................................. 9

3.7 Task 7 – As-Built Drawings (Bid Option) ........................................................... 9

4.0 Submittals................................................................................................................... 9

5.0 Acceptance Criteria.................................................................................................. 10

6.0 Configuration Management and Standards ............................................................. 10

6.1 Design Team Task Lead Expectations ................................................................10

6.2 Design Process ..................................................................................................11

6.3 Design Interfaces ...............................................................................................11

6.4 Documentation ..................................................................................................11

6.5 Design Reviews .................................................................................................13

6.6 Design Verification............................................................................................13

6.7 As-Built Process ................................................................................................14

7.0 Requirements ........................................................................................................... 14

7.1 Engineering Requirements .................................................................................14

7.2 Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Requirements .....................................15

7.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements ...............................................................16

7.4 Government Property .........................................................................................17

7.5 Commercial Off the Shelf Software ....................................................................17

7.6 Procurement Of or Specification For New Electrical Equipment or Components ..18

8.0 Personnel Requirements........................................................................................... 18



of 37


8.1 Required Qualifications .....................................................................................19

8.2 Training Requirements .......................................................................................22

8.3 Security and Badging Requirements ...................................................................22

8.4 Work Location / Potential Access Requirements .................................................23

8.5 Site Access and Work Hours ..............................................................................23

9.0 Meetings ................................................................................................................... 23

9.1 Subcontract Kick-Off Meeting ...........................................................................24

9.2 Design Progress Meetings ..................................................................................24

9.3 Design Review Meetings ...................................................................................24

9.4 Construction Progress Meetings .........................................................................25

10.0 Deliverables and Performance Schedule Requirements........................................... 25

10.1 Deliverables ...................................................................................................25

10.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................25

10.3 Payment Schedule ..........................................................................................25

11.0 Special Requirements ............................................................................................... 26

APPENDIX A – Submittal Register .................................................................................... 27

APPENDIX B - 30/60/90 Design Deliverables ..................................................................... 31

APPENDIX C – Drawing and/or Document List ................................................................ 35

APPENDIX D – Preconceptual Line Routing ..................................................................... 37



of 37


1.0 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND

The Department of Energy/200W (200W) public water system supplies sanitary water (SW) to facilities on Hanford’s Central Plateau. The 200W system is owned by the Department of Energy,

under the management of the Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL). Under the authority of the Water Purveyor, MSA Water and Sewer Utilities (W&SU) Operations manages the 200W system. The various systems, facilities, and plants supporting the Hanford Site Cleanup Mission require a safe and reliable SW supply into the Long-Term Stewardship period. The 200W system exists to

support the Cleanup Mission at the Hanford Site and provides SW to the Central Plateau as well as fire protection water supply.

In the operational configuration, the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) is supplied by one (1) SW line at the southern complex boundary. This creates a single point of failure should a break in this line

occur, which could place WTP in a state of impairment. The WTP is an integral component to the effort to cleanup contamination on the Hanford site.

Project L-839 will eliminate a single point failure and provide a redundant sanitary water (SW) supply to the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP).

2.0 OBJECTIVE

Through this Statement of Work (SOW), Mission Support Alliance, LLC (MSA) is requesting Architectural/Engineering Firm (A/E) services for design, construction support,

startup/testing/commissioning support and as-built/closeout support.

The A/E shall provide all aspects of engineering including civil, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, and instrumentation and controls. Deliverables shall be stamped by a currently licensed professional engineer (PE) and will include drawings, construction specifications,

procurement specifications, calculations, Washington State Department of Health (WDOH) approved project documents, and as-built drawings as well as general engineering support, in accordance with the requirements of this SOW and document HNF-FRDC-62970, Functional Requirements and Design Criteria, 12-in. Potable Water Loop-Line to WTP.

3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK - SPECIFIC

The A/E shall provide all aspects of engineering services including management, administration, coordination, and development of design documents required to support construction,

installation, testing, startup and commissioning associated with the Project in accordance with the requirements of this SOW and HNF-FRDC-62970.



of 37


Tasks shall include but are not limited to:

Design routing of roughly 13,000-ft. of 12-in C900 PVC pipe.

Determine location of new sampling stations to monitor water quality, water meter and pressure transducer.

Determine locations for new drain/vent valve stations and concrete encasements/thrust blocks for new loop-line as required.

Develop plans for tie-in and testing of new loop-line to existing system.

The A/E shall prepare and submit to MSA a current Washington State licensed PE stamped Project Report in accordance with WAC 246-290-110 using the Water Treatment Facilities Checklist in Appendix A, Section VIII of the Water System Design Manual, Washington State

Department of Health (WDOH), Publication No. 331-123 Rev. 12/09. Phasing of the installation shall be coordinated to minimize downtime of the water system.

NOTE: This SOW includes seven (7) tasks described below. All tasks, one (1) through seven (7) are to be included as itemized pricing.

Table 1. Task Descriptions

Task No. Description

Base Bid

1 30% Design Package



4 100% Final Design Package

Bid Option 5 Engineering Support to Construction

6 Testing/Startup/Commissioning Support

7 As Built Drawings

3.1 Task 1 – 30% Design Package

See Appendix B, 30/60/90 Design Deliverables for minimum deliverables expected with the 30% design package.

Native Files shall be submitted with the 30% design package or within four business days of

submittal (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc.).



of 37


During the development of the 30% design package deliverables, the A/E shall conduct a subsurface scan and topographical survey. If additional information is required beyond the 30%, then a geotechnical report shall be performed and generated by the A/E.

The A/E shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 30% design package and submit to MSA for approval. Task 1 shall not be complete until comment dispositions are approved by MSA. If no resubmit is required, the A/E shall incorporate comments and submit with the 60%

design package.


See Appendix B, 30/60/90 Design Deliverables for minimum deliverables expected with the

60% design package. WAC 246-290-110 Project Report shall not require a PE stamp at this deliverable.

Native Files shall be submitted with the 60% design package or within four business days of submittal (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc.).

The A/E shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 60% design package and submit to MSA for approval. Task 2 shall not be complete until comment dispositions are approved by MSA. If no resubmit is required, the A/E shall incorporate comments and submit with the 90% design package.


See Appendix B, 30/60/90 Design Deliverables for minimum deliverables expected with the 90% design package. WAC 246-290-110 Project Report shall not require a PE stamp at this

deliverable.

Native Files shall be submitted with the 90% design package or within four business days of submittal (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc.).

The A/E shall disposition the MSA comments submitted on the 90% design package and submit

to MSA for approval. Task 3 shall not be complete until comment dispositions are approved by MSA. If no resubmit is required, the A/E shall incorporate comments and submit with the final design package.

3.4 Task 4 – 100% Final Design Package

The 100% design package deliverable shall incorporate any final comments submitted during the 90% review and be fully checked and ready for issue and release (including the DCN cover



of 37


sheets and information required for the Engineering Package [EP]). The 100% package should not include new information, unless it was identified and required at the 90% review.

WAC 246-290-110 Project Report shall require a PE stamp and be completed with this

deliverable.

The 100% design documents shall be PE stamped/signed and include native files (Word, Excel, AutoCAD, etc.).

3.5 Task 5 – Engineering Support to Construction (Bid Option)

The A/E shall provide engineering services during construction. This will include reviewing and approving submittals, responding to Request for Clarification/Information (RCI), creating Design Change Notices (DCN), Facility Modification Packages (FMP), submitting Washington Department of Health (WDOH) Project Report updates to MSA if/when significant design

changes are needed to be implemented, site visits to inspect construction and attending meetings. An Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) will be required to address potential issues/hazards related to construction site visits.

The basis for the cost of this work shall include:

The A/E shall assign an individual to be the Task Lead (TL) (See Section 6.1 for more details on the expectations of the TL). The TL shall work closely with MSA Buyer’s Technical Representative (BTR), MSA Project Engineer and the MSA Project Manager.

Reviewing and approving technical submittals – Estimated quantity of 20.

Responding to RCIs from the construction subcontractor or other entities– Estimated quantity of 10.

Major design changes – Estimated quantity of 3.

A major design change requires the A/E to perform additional design or design rework, review, and approval documented in a DCN and/or FMP.

o DCNs may be required during construction when field conditions or RCIs result in one of the following: design rework, additional drawing sheet(s), or a design

change. The A/E is expected to create new drawings or perform the necessary drawing changes, and fully check and verify design additions/changes.

o FMP revisions may be required during construction when field conditions or RCIs result in one of the following: design rework or a design change. The A/E is

expected to perform the necessary drawing changes, and fully check and verify the design changes.

NOTE: Calculations may require updating depending on the extent design change.



of 37


MSA engineers retain the ability to perform minor design changes throughout the duration of construction. Minor design changes do not affect the intent or function of the original design. Minor changes may include things such as equivalent part substitution,

slight relocation of utilities due to field interferences, etc. These changes are performed and tracked with DCNs and/or FMPs. Copies of the DCNs/FMPs will be sent to the A/E as they are issued/released for tracking purposes.

Site Visits – Estimated quantity of 3.

o Site visits will include site reviews with MSA and the construction subcontractor to identify any work that is incomplete or requires correction prior to achieving Substantial Completion. The A/E may choose to include additional site visits to ensure construction is meeting project requirements and expectations at their

discretion and noted in the proposal.

The Engineer of Record shall be required to stamp and submit any partial, as required, and final WDOH Construction Completion Report(s) within 60 days of completion of the Project, and prior to use.

3.6 Task 6 – Testing / Startup / Commissioning (Bid Option)

3.6.1 Testing Documentation

The A/E shall develop the following test documentation using MSC-PRO-ENG-286, Testing of Equipment and Systems (Table 2, Testing Documentation provides high-level

expectations for each type of testing document).

Test Plan – Higher level document defining the required tests, extent of testing, test boundary, testing sequence/schedule, testing methods, rationale for testing,

relationships among items tested and other systems, test or inspection controls to be applied, and review and approval requirements.

o The Test Plan shall also identify the need for Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT), Construction Acceptance Testing (CAT), and/or Operational

Acceptance Testing (OAT) documentation to support system startup and commissioning. The A/E will be responsible to produce the testing documentation required for FAT, CAT, and/or OAT.

Test Specification(s) – Identifies specific tests to be performed, test requirements

and parameters for each test, and test criteria. Testing may be included as part of the Construction Specification or as a standalone Test Specification.

Test Procedure(s) – Provides detailed instructions for performing tests, the acceptance/success criteria, records results; includes prerequisites, precautions,

special equipment, test sequence; identifies hold points; assurance that the scope



of 37


and objectives defined by the associated test requirements are satisfied; and objective evidence and confirmation of successful acceptance or success criteria.

Test Report(s) – Provides a summary of the test results, activities undertaken, and

a conclusion of the test results. The A/E shall develop the final outline and format of the Test Report for review and approval by MSA. The construction subcontractor will perform the testing, fill in the required test results, and provide additional documentation as required. The construction subcontractor will submit

the final Test Report to MSA for approval.

Test documents may be standalone documents or may be imbedded within a DCN or FMP. For standalone test documents, suggested outlines are provided in MSC-STD-ENG-60816, Engineering Test Documentation.

3.6.2 Operations and Maintenance Manuals

The A/E shall compile necessary vendor supplied operations and maintenance manuals and design documentation to develop draft procedures for MSA to be able to properly operate, maintain, and troubleshoot the system/equipment/component. See Section 6.4

for more information on MSA procedures.

3.7 Task 7 – As-Built Drawings (Bid Option)

The A/E shall provide as-built drawings and specification(s) at the end of the project. Following construction completion, the A/E is expected to update the drawings and specifications to

incorporate all DCNs and FMPs into the final as-built documentation (including those generated by MSA as a minor change described in Section 3.6). The drawings shall depict the final configuration of the work performed and the specification shall be updated to reflect any changes made during construction. The signed and PE stamped as-built drawings and specifications shall

be submitted to MSA along with the native files. As-built deliverables will be provided in the form of a DCN and FMP.

4.0 SUBMITTALS

See Appendix A, Submittal Register for details related to submittal format, type, review cycles,

etc. All submittals listed on the Submittal Register shall be submitted to MSA Project Document Control at [email protected] using the Subcontractor Document Submittal Form (Site Form A-6003-061) and carbon copy (CC) the Buyer’s Technical Representative (BTR) and Contract Specialist (CS). All transmittal subject headings shall contain, at a minimum, the subcontract

number, task Release number, submittal number, and submittal description.

Forms are available at the following web address under the “Subcontractor Document Forms” link: http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/ContractorForms

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/ContractorForms



of 37


A/E deliverables shall be submitted electronically and may include a hard copy. Electronic files must be non-password protected in one of the following formats:

Microsoft® Office Compatible

Primavera P6 (XER)

Microsoft Project (MMP)

Adobe® Reader or Acrobat® (PDF)

Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG)

Mathcad Prime 3.1

AutoCAD® (DWG) – 2013 to 2017 version (if later than 2017, back save to 2017

version)

Windows Media Video (WMV).

Electronic submittals may be sent to Project Document Control or delivered via a

MSA-designated File Transfer Protocol (FTP) site.

All engineering submittals must be peer reviewed/quality checked to ensure completeness and accuracy prior to submittal.

Native files for all deliverables shall be provided as noted in the Submittal Register or as

requested by the BTR at any point during subcontract performance.

Requests for Clarification/Information are to be provided to the Project Document Control, CC the BTR and the CS, using the Request for Clarification or Information Form (A-6003-063).

5.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA

A/E work products and services shall meet applicable standards as defined in this SOW and HNF-FRDC-62970. All final design documents shall be approved/stamped by the A/E’s current Washington State licensed PE, if required under Section 3, Description of Work – Specific; Appendix A, 30/60/90 Engineering Deliverables; or Appendix A, Submittal Register.

At the BTR’s discretion, design submittals that are not accepted may only require resubmittal of the Comment Response Form with acceptable comment dispositions to be incorporated into subsequent design submittals.

6.0 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AND STANDARDS

6.1 Design Team Task Lead Expectations

The A/E shall establish a single point of contact to fulfill the role of Task Lead (TL) (e.g., the A/E’s Project Manager). The TL is responsible for coordinating the engineering efforts of the multi-disciplined team in the execution of this subcontract. The TL shall work closely with the

MSA Project Manager and the MSA Engineering Manager (or their delegate), as applicable, to



of 37


monitor the design budget and schedule. The TL is responsible for preparation of work plans or assisting in preparation of the deliverables.

The TL is the point of contact for the effort and has overall responsibility for adequacy of design

inputs, for establishing technical interfaces and integration of disciplines, and for ensuring that the job is completed in accordance with the specified engineering and quality requirements, procedures, and schedule.

The TL is accountable to:

The MSA Design Authority/Engineer(s) to ensure the design products are developed in accordance with the design requirements and criteria.

The MSA Project Manager and Engineering Manager, as applicable, for integration of

technical work with the project or task scope, schedule, and budget and to ensure the design meets technical requirements, specifications, and quality requirements.

6.2 Design Process

The A/E shall develop design content in accordance with their internal, qualified engineering

program, process and procedures, except where noted in this SOW.

The A/E shall establish and control design interfaces in accordance with Section 6.3.

The design content shall be documented in accordance with Section 6.4.

The A/E shall perform an internal design review of their generated designs in accordance with

Section 6.5.

6.3 Design Interfaces

Design interfaces shall be identified, documented, and controlled in a specification or on an MSA drawing and be uniquely identified.

6.4 Documentation

Work produced as part of this SOW shall be documented and meet the MSA standards listed in Section 7.1, Engineering Requirements, the statements below, and HNF-FRDC-62970.

Specifications and other Technical Documents . New or revised specifications or other

technical documents shall be prepared in accordance with the A/E’s internal procedures. Appropriate editorial and presentation standards shall be employed. Specifications and technical documents received by MSA will be reviewed, approved and released by MSA using the Engineering Package (EP) electronic approval process in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-440,

Engineering Package Process. The A/E shall prepare and finalize the document, and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release. Each document will have a



of 37


unique document number obtained through the Hanford Document Numbering System (HDNS). The A/E shall submit a list of specifications and/or technical documents, and then MSA will request and supply the document numbers.

Design Analysis. The A/E shall develop design analyses in accordance with their own internal processes. Design analysis documentation shall include:

1. Definition of the objective of the analysis;

2. Definition of analysis inputs and their sources;

3. Results of literature searches or other applicable background data;

4. Identification of assumptions and indication of those that must be verified as the design proceeds;

5. Identification of any computer calculation including computer type, computer program

(e.g., name), revision identification, inputs, outputs, evidence of or reference to computer program verification and validation and the bases (or reference hereto) supporting application of the computer program to the specific physical problem;

6. Review and approval.

Native files are submitted with the design package submittals for each analysis and subsequent revision.

Standalone design analyses received by MSA (i.e., those not incorporated into a Facility Modification Package or Design Change Notice) will be reviewed, approved, and released using

the EP process. Design analyses incorporated into an EP shall use Form A-6007-113, Calculation Peer Review Checklist.

Engineering Calculations. New or revised engineering calculations shall be prepared and issued in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-8259, MSC Calculation Preparation and Issue.

Standalone calculations will be assigned a document number from the HDNS and released by MSA using the EP electronic approval process. Calculations shall be submitted with Form A-6007-113, Calculation Peer Review Checklist. The A/E shall prepare and finalize the calculation, and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release.

Engineering Drawings. New or revised Engineering Drawings to be released into MSA document control system shall be prepared in accordance with HNF-14660 Offsite Vendor Instructions for Preparation and Control of Engineering Drawings. Drawings submitted as vendor information are exempt from this requirement. See Appendix C for list of existing

essential, support, reference drawings and other relevant documents.

Facility Modification Packages (FMP). A FMP shall be used for modifications to existing drawings affected by the design. The FMP shall be prepared in accordance with



of 37


MSC-PRO-ENG-2001, Facility Modification Package Process. The A/E shall prepare the attached drawings, documents, etc. and then MSA will initiate the EP and process the package for approval and release. Standard AutoCAD borders for FMP continuation pages can be

provided to the A/E upon request.

Design Change Notices (DCN). The DCN shall be used to issue new and authorize changes to engineering drawings to be “Approved for Construction.” New or revised DCNs shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-8016, Design Change Notice

Process and Form A-6003-324, Design Change Notice. The form also includes instructions along with copies of the forms used for sketches supporting DCN (both portrait and landscape).

Test Documentation. Testing documentation including Test Plan, Test Specification(s), Test Procedures(s), and Test Report(s) in support of FAT, CAT, and OAT shall be developed in

accordance with MSC-PRO-ENG-286. Outlines for each of the document types are included in MSC-STD-ENG-60816. Templates provided by MSA and the procedure outlines can serve as a starting point; the A/E can make additions/deletions as necessary to meet requirements of the Project.

MSA Procedures. New or revised procedures for Operations and Maintenance shall be developed or modified per MSC-PLN-MN-56352, Maintenance Management Plan and in accordance with MSC-PRO-MS-589, Mission Support Contract Management System Documents.

6.5 Design Reviews

The preparation, checking, verification, review, approval and release of all design media needed for the design is included in this SOW. MSA may conduct design reviews on design packages developed under this subcontract in accordance with internal MSA procedures and guides. MSA

Engineering will conduct formal design reviews at the 30%, 60%, and 90% design stages. The MSA-conducted design reviews are not be construed as design verification approval.

Each design product shall be checked, reviewed, and approved internally by the A/E prior to providing the design package to MSA for review, comment, and subsequent approval. Accuracy

of the content and checking for technical adequacy should be appropriate for the stage of design unless otherwise requested by the MSA Design Authority and/or Project Engineer. Design products submitted shall be so noted by watermark or stamp that clearly reflects the stage of design completion (e.g., “30% preliminary,” etc.). In all cases, the deliverable package shall

include an index of the information provided, placeholders for “planned” additions, and be a complete, accurate, and quality conscious representation of the design effort conducted to date.

6.6 Design Verification

The A/E shall submit a design verification plan for all designs as part of the detailed work

execution plan (see Section 7.0) to MSA for review and approval. The design verification plan shall describe the method of implementing and documenting reviews to the extent possible,



of 37


understanding that the design has not yet been developed and refinement of the plan may be required as the design progresses.

The A/E shall fully check the final design stage (90%) products in accordance with their

approved Quality Assurance Program and internal implementing procedures. MSA considers 90% design products to be ready for final issue and/or construction. In addition to technical adequacy, checking shall address drafting standard compliance (where applicable as defined in Section 6.4), editorial errors, and overall workmanship.

The A/E shall submit evidence of final design verification documenting the design verification method(s) used (e.g., peer review, alternate calculation, etc.), completed checklists, required verification matrices, etc.

6.7 As-Built Process

The subcontractor shall have a documented as-built process as part of their engineering program procedures that will ensure that as-building activities will depict the post-installation physical facility conditions. The as-built documentation shall be submitted to MSA in the form of a DCN and/or FMP as described in Section 6.4.

7.0 REQUIREMENTS

The A/E shall provide a detailed work execution plan that includes design approach, design development description and rationale, conceptual design schedule, design verification strategy (see Section 6.6), design review meetings (see Section 9.3), and key support personnel. The

design approach shall provide a detailed understanding of the entire scope of this SOW. The schedule shall include a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and associated WBS descriptions as necessary.

General

For any work performed on the Hanford Site or any MSA controlled facility, the provisions of the Special Provisions – On-Site, https://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/Provisions, will apply to A/E personnel.

7.1 Engineering Requirements

The A/E shall follow the applicable engineering procedures listed in below.

http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/Provisions



of 37


Table 2. Additional MSA Procedures

Number Rev. Title

EU-PRO-ENG-60779 1-3 Equipment and Component Labeling

HNF-14660 4 Off-Site Vendor Direction for Preparation and Control of Engineering Drawings

MSC-PLN-MN-56352 4 Maintenance Management Program

MSC-PRO-ENG-286 4 Testing of Equipment and Systems

MSC-PRO-ENG-440 3 MSC Engineering Package Process

MSC-PRO-ENG-2001 3-1 Facility Modification Package Process

MSC-PRO-ENG-8016 4 Design Change Notice Process

MSC-PRO-ENG-8259 4 MSC Calculation Preparation and Issue

MSC-PRO-ENG-16406 1 Vendor Information (VI) Process

MSC-PRO-MS-589 16 Mission Support Contract Management System Documents

MSC-STD-ENG-097 2 MSC Engineering Design Codes, Standards and Site Specific Design Parameters

MSC-STD-ENG-60816 0-1 Engineering Test Documentation

WSU-PRO-OP-60412 8-4 Equipment and Piping Labeling

The A/E shall follow the applicable codes, standards, regulations, etc. listed in

HNF-FRDC-62970, Section 5.0 for the Project Code of Record.

7.2 Environment, Safety, and Health (ES&H) Requirements

A/E personnel attending meetings or performing walk downs of general office facilities on the Hanford Site receive coverage under the MSA General Hazards Analysis (GHA). The GHA

covers hazards commonly encountered during the performance of daily routine activities.

A/E personnel and lower-tier subcontractors shall be responsible to complete an Employee Job Task Analysis (EJTA) in accordance with MSC-PRO-WP-11058, Occupational Medical Qualification and Monitoring using EJTA for any of the following situations:

a. For any A/E or lower-tier subcontractor employee who will be on the Hanford Site for

more than 30 days in a year

b. For any A/E or lower-tier subcontractor employee who may potentially be exposed to

hazards (e.g. radiological, beryllium, hazardous wastes, noise) while performing in accordance with the subcontract SOW



of 37


c. For any A/E or lower-tier subcontractor employee enrolled in a medical or exposure monitoring program required by 10 CFR 851, and/or any other applicable federal, state or local regulation or other obligation.

If any of the above conditions exist, the A/E and its lower-tier subcontractor employee are to have a current approved EJTA prior to that employee beginning work on the Hanford Site.

The MSA Safety Professional shall review any changes to the scope or associated activities for any potential impacts to the Subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor employees.

MSA’s Safety and Health Procedures are available on the internet at http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/Construction. The documents on this site are kept current and are available for the A/E use.

The A/E shall flow down all ES&H requirements to the lowest tier subcontractor performing

work in support of this SOW and associated activities.

7.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Requirements

The work activities for this SOW have been designated as General Service, Quality Level 3.

The A/E shall document, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that utilizes a national or international voluntary consensus standard or equivalent (i.e. International Standards Organization (ISO) 9001, etc.) that include the following requirements, as a minimum:

Organizational structure, including a description of roles and responsibilities

QAP which describes the process to control items and activities

Indoctrination, training, and qualification and/or certification of project personnel

Design control, including design verification/validation, change control, and software

quality requirements to ensure software produces correct results

Implementing procedures and/or instructions that describe step by step activities

Document control to ensure only correct documents are being used

Corrective action management to identify and correct issues that lead to process improvements

Quality records which are protected from loss or deterioration and are submitted.

http://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/Construction



of 37


Upon award of the subcontract (see Attachment 1, Submittal Register for due date), the QAP document and implementing procedures are required to be reviewed and approved by the MSA Quality Assurance Organization. If the Subcontractor’s QAP has been previously submitted and

approved by MSA, and is current, the Subcontractor may submit a statement to this effect with the proposal and for the submittal requirement. If the Subcontractor’s QAP has been previously submitted and approved by MSA, but is not current, the updated QAP shall undergo resubmission to MSA for review and approval. The Subcontractor shall submit proposed

changes to the QAP and implementing procedures to the Buyer/QAE/CS for review and approval prior to implementation during the performance of this Subcontract.

The A/E shall be responsible for performing quality workmanship and shall conduct the quality control measures necessary to ensure that all work confirms to referenced codes, standards, and

other requirements as defined by this SOW.

If the A/E subcontracts any portion of this work scope to lower tier subcontractors, the A/E shall be responsible for the flow down of applicable portions of this SOW to their lower-tier subcontractors, including engineering and quality assurance requirements, pertaining to services

and activities for which they are responsible.

All A/E activities are subject to oversight by MSA’s QAE and/or Engineering representative(s) at the A/E’s facilities, including lower-tier facilities if applicable. Access to the A/E’s or lower-tier’s facilities shall be requested through the A/E’s contract representative and MSA’s

CS. The visit may be performed jointly with the A/E.

7.4 Government Property

Government property is not required to be used by the A/E in the performance of this SOW.

7.5 Commercial Off the Shelf Software

The A/E shall submit the following documentation for all engineering analysis/design, data analysis/reduction, and engineering/environmental modeling commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software1 (application) used in the performance of work activities. Documentation shall be provided even if the applications are verified through manual verification/independent

calculations and/or analyses.

NOTE: If the same COTS product is utilized for a range of calculations this documentation only needs to be submitted once, but documents/calculations shall be traceable back to number 1 specified below and is subject to oversight activities.

1 COTS software refers to an existing application which will be implemented on a standard operating system without

the need for modification of its executable/object code.



of 37


1. Description of the COTS software including:

a. Manufacturer’s name and address

b. COTS application’s title and version identifier

c. Operating system and hardware platform that will be used

d. Manufacturer’s Technical Specifications or other published description of the COTS.

2. Standard data set(s) used to verify operation of the COTS application

a. Data sets shall cover each function or mode of operation which will be used during the performance of the work activities.

b. When the COTS application’s range of operation cannot be verified by a single data set, the A/E shall submit, as a minimum, data sets covering the upper and

lower thirds of its range.

3. A/E shall notify MSA of any software errors related to COTS deliverables.

COTS requirements are also detailed in the Contract Documents. Should a conflict exist between this SOW and the Contract Documents, the Contract Documents shall be followed.

7.6 Procurement Of or Specification For New Electrical Equipment or Components

All new electrical equipment and/or components procured as part of this SOW shall meet the following requirements:

Unless otherwise approved by MSA, all electrical equipment and industrial control panels

[a general term including material, fittings, devices, appliances, luminaires (fixtures), apparatus, and the like, used as a part of, or in connection with, an electrical installation] delivered or brought onto the site in performance of a subcontract must be labeled by an organization currently recognized by OSHA as a nationally recognized testing laboratory

(NRTL).

All electrical equipment installed as part of a subcontract must comply with the National Electric Code (NEC), NFPA 70 and where applicable ANSI C2 (NESC).

8.0 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

A/E personnel performing engineering services shall have, appropriate training, experience, qualification and/or certification(s) to perform the work required for this SOW. Documentation/certification of personnel qualifications shall be maintained by the A/E and

provided to MSA upon request. A/E personnel qualifications/certifications may be verified by



of 37


MSA prior to performing work in order to provide reasonable assurance that the A/E has assigned the personnel with sufficient documented training, education, and experience to satisfy the specified requirements.

It is expected that the A/E will identify and apply an appropriate mix of resources and experience to each task to ensure MSA is receiving the best value possible for the engineering services being requested.

The A/E shall notify the BTR of any changes to key personnel submitted with the bid proposal

and/or approved by MSA. New personnel will require a resubmit of their resume/qualifications for review and approval by MSA.

8.1 Required Qualifications

A/E shall ensure that its personnel meet and maintain the appropriate training, qualification and

certification requirements.

A/E shall provide current Washington State licensed Professional Engineers in each discipline.

It is expected that the A/E will identify and apply an appropriate mix of resources and experience to each task to ensure that MSA is receiving the best value possible for the engineering services

being requested.

Table 3. Engineering Services Staff Qualifications

Discipline Progression2 Experience Level/Qualifications3

Principal Engineer Applies advanced engineering techniques and analyses for problems and

methods. Has extensive experience in general engineering.

Minimum Qualifications: Bachelors of Science (BS) degree in Engineering

discipline PLUS 15 or more years engineering experience, or equivalent

combination of education and experience related directly to the tasks/design defined within this SOW.

2 The entries for Principle Engineer, Senior Engineer, Advanced Engineer, and Entry -Level Engineer should be

interpreted to include the following engineering disciplines: Electrical, Mechanical, Civil, Structural, Architectural, HVAC, and Fire Protection.

3 Education and experience equivalencies are expected to meet the requirements of DOE O 426.2, Personnel Selection, Training, Qualification, and Certification Requirements for DOE Nuclear Facilities. It is the

responsibility of the A/E to develop and submit these equivalencies.



of 37



Senior Engineer Performs conventional design engineering and analysis. Plans and

conducts independent evaluation, selection, and adaptation of engineering

techniques, procedures, and criteria. When assigned, may provide

managerial and/or technical direction to other engineers.

Minimum Qualifications: BS degree in Engineering discipline PLUS 10 to 14 years engineering experience, or equivalent combination of education and experience related directly to the tasks/design defined within this SOW.

Advanced Engineer Under general supervision, evaluates, selects, and applies standard

engineering techniques, procedures, and criteria.

Minimum Qualifications: BS degree in Engineering discipline PLUS 4 to 9

years engineering experience, or equivalent combination of education and experience related directly to the tasks/design defined within this SOW.

Entry-Level Engineer Under supervision, performs standardized assignments using standard

engineering techniques, procedures, and criteria.

Minimum Qualifications: BS degree in Engineering discipline PLUS 0 to 3

years engineering experience, or equivalent combination of education and experience.

Senior Designer/CAD

Technician

Experienced and proficient in providing direction to designers producing

AutoCAD drawings, performing drawing revisions, engineering changes

documents, and performing field walk downs to obtain dimensions and equipment layout. Responsible for site, facility, system, equipment and

product research to produce design drawings under the direction of design

engineers.

Minimum Qualifications: Associates (AA) degree, minimum of 12 years

progressive responsible experience, and/or equivalent technical/trade school degree plus additional years of progressive experience as a designer in an infrastructure and/or utility service environment.

Designer/CAD

Technician

Experienced and proficient in producing AutoCAD drawings, performing

drawing revisions, engineering changes documents, and performing field walk downs to obtain dimensions and equipment layout. Responsible for

limited site, facility, system, equipment and product research to produce

design drawings under the direction of design engineers.

Minimum Qualifications: AA degree, minimum of 5 to 11 years of

experience or equivalent technical/trade school degree or additional progressive experience.



of 37



Project Manager Responsible for management and execution of assigned project(s) in

accordance with the requirements of the subcontract between the

Subcontractor and MSA, and the A/E’s operating policies and principles.

Responsible for execution of the work in accordance with the quality

standards and requirements specified for the project.

Minimum Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree PLUS 15 or more years related experience.

Technical Writer/Editor Researches, writes, edits, and proofreads technical data for use in

documents or sections of documents such as manuals, procedures, and

specifications. Ensures technical documentation is accurate, complete,

meets editorial and government specification, and adheres to standards for

quality, graphics, coverage, format, and style.

Minimum Qualifications: AA degree in an applicable technical field and 2 years related experience, or an equivalent combination of education and experience.

Clerk/Administrative

Assistant

Handles with minimum supervision and technical assistance standard

clerical work related directly to the assigned subcontract Release. Activities typically performed include typing, report preparation, and

record keeping.

Minimum Qualifications: Graduation from high school and 2 years clerical experience.

Project

Controls/Scheduler

Prepares or assists in preparation of estimating, scheduling, or cost

engineering requirements for a project or assignment. Reviews work for

completeness as required by project specifications and scope definition.

Applies standard cost and/or scheduling data to departmental programs or

systems.

Minimum Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree in Business or related field and

5 or more years related experience, or a combination of education and experience.

Cost Estimator Prepares estimates (i.e., fair cost, conceptual, definitive design). Reviews

specifications and drawings/sketches for the preparation of the cost

estimate(s). Performs detailed quantity takeoff of drawings or sketches.

Applies appropriate cost elements (e.g., overhead, escalation, contingency,

profit) as applicable to the contract type.

Minimum Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree in Business, Engineering or

related field and 5 or more years related experience, or a combination of education and experience.



of 37



QA Engineer Defines and develops quality standards for receiving, in-process and final

inspection in accordance with company and contractual requirements.

Reviews and evaluates complex in-process rejections and implements

corrective actions as needed. Interfaces with customers, vendors, and

company departments to resolve quality problems and provide information. Participates in and may lead audits. Provides technical support to

inspection personnel and feedback to management on inspection and test

trends, returns, and vendor performance.

Minimum Qualifications: Bachelor’s degree in Engineering or related field and 5 or more years related experience.

8.2 Training Requirements

The table below includes the training requirements associated with this SOW.

Table 4. Training Requirements

Hours Course Number Description

4 000001 HGET* – Computer-Based Training (CBT)

4 110001 MSA General Employee Training (MGET) - CBT *In lieu of HGET, employees may complete the Hanford Site Orientation (HSO) which is sent to the A/E at their location.

Some courses may only require a limited number of employees, not ALL employees, to attend in order to complete a specific task for the scope and associated activities.

The A/E shall be responsible for all wages of their employees or lower-tier subcontractor

employees while attending any required training courses. MSA will schedule and furnish Hanford Site-specific training courses at no cost to the A/E.

CBT training may be coordinated through Vivid Learning Systems, 372-0335.

Any changes to the scope or associated activities shall be reviewed by the MSA Safety and

Training Professionals for any potential impacts to the A/E or lower-tier subcontractor employees.

The A/E shall flow down all training requirements, as applicable, to the lowest tier subcontractor performing work in support of this SOW and associated activities.

8.3 Security and Badging Requirements

A/E personnel attending meetings, performing walk downs on the Hanford Site, or accessing a controlled access facility shall obtain a standard or temporary badge.



of 37


A standard badge shall be obtained by filling out and sending a Badge Request Form to the CS. Once authorized, present two forms of identification or the enhanced identification at the MSA Central Badging Office.

For a temporary badge, send the name, company (who they work for) and if they are a U.S citizen to the CS. Once authorized, present two forms of identification or the enhanced identification at the MSA Central Badging Office. If the employee was not born in the U.S. (the place of birth is outside of the U.S.) then the naturalization paperwork must also be provided.

For more information on badging, please see the MSA Procurement Website at: https://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/safetyandsecurity

A/E personnel attending meetings, performing walk downs on the Hanford Site, or accessing any Hanford facility shall be familiar with Hanford Site emergency management requirements and

response expectations to Hanford Site Emergency Alerting System warnings or sirens. A/E personnel shall also participate in any emergency preparedness drill or exercise that may be taking place unless otherwise exempted by the Drill/Exercise Coordinator.

A/E employees will be required to submit to vehicle searches and not personally carry or

transport certain prohibited articles.

8.4 Work Location / Potential Access Requirements

A majority of work activities will be performed at the A/E’s facilities. Project meetings and/or field walk downs may be performed on the Hanford Site. MSA anticipates the A/E will not

access any radiological controlled areas for which additional radiological training is required.

It is not anticipated, but the A/E shall coordinate with the Buyer if the work scope requires access to the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) boundary.

8.5 Site Access and Work Hours

Hanford personnel at the Hanford Site work a standard 4/10 schedule. The standard work week consists of ten (10) hours of work between 6:00 am and 4:30 pm, with one-half hour designated as an unpaid period for lunch, Monday through Thursday.

Work performed outside normal operating hours shall be coordinated and/or approved through

the BTR and/or the CS prior to performing the work.

9.0 MEETINGS

A/E shall participate in all meetings as required by the BTR.

General purpose of meetings is for the coordination, control, and direction of the work. In

addition to meetings addressed by this Section, the A/E may be required by other Sections and

https://www.hanford.gov/pmm/page.cfm/safetyandsecurity



of 37


other Subcontract documents to conduct special-purpose meetings and various safety meetings and briefings.

MSA will issue meeting notices and prepare an agenda and minutes for each meeting addressed

in this Section unless otherwise specified. When applicable, minutes will identify action items, assigned actionees, and due dates.

Table 5. Meeting Attendance

Task

No.

Attendance in Person

Description Mandatory Optional

N/A X Design Kick-Off Meeting

N/A X Design Progress Meetings

1 X 30% Design Package 2 X 60% Design Review Meeting

3 X 90% Design Review Meeting

4 X 100% Design Package

5 X Construction Support

6 X Testing/Startup/Commissioning, Meet with Operations

7 X As-Built Drawings

9.1 Subcontract Kick-Off Meeting

Prior to the start of work, a kick-off meeting will be held between MSA and the A/E at a time and location agreed to by both parties. Invited attendees will include MSA, A/E, and others

having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to coordinate the start or work, discuss the A/E’s scope, deliverable due dates, information transfer, reviews, meetings, reporting, etc.

9.2 Design Progress Meetings

MSA and the A/E shall meet on a regular basis to status progress at a time, location and frequency determined by MSA. Invited attendees will include MSA, A/E, and others having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues and proposed resolutions, review schedule, discuss comments, and provide on-the-spot answers.

9.3 Design Review Meetings

Design review meeting will be held to ensure the design objectives are achieved. The meeting will be held after the design packages have been received by MSA, and prior to MSA submitting comments. The design review meeting shall be included in the A/E’s Work Execution Plan,

including the proposed method of implementing and documenting the review meeting. The final time and location will be determined by MSA, but within the A/E’s Work Execution Plan. Attendees will include MSA Project personnel and the A/E. Other invitees may include MSA



of 37


personnel from Operations, Maintenance, Safety, Environmental, Quality Assurance, Facilities, Procurement, and Engineering.

9.4 Construction Progress Meetings

The A/E shall participate in the construction progress meetings with MSA and the construction subcontractor. Invited attendees will include MSA, A/E, construction subcontractor, and others having an interest in the work. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues and proposed resolutions, review schedule, discuss comments, and provide on-the-spot answers. The A/E may

attend the meetings via conference call.

10.0 DELIVERABLES AND PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS

10.1 Deliverables

All deliverables associated with this SOW have been identified in Appendix A, Submittal

Register. The A/E shall maintain a project schedule to ensure completion of design deliverables. On a weekly basis, the A/E shall be prepared to report progress on the MSA Project Schedule maintained by the MSA Project Team. Status reporting is expected to include the completion date(s) and percent complete for each deliverable.

10.2 Schedule

The period of performance for this scope of work is established as:

Start Date: Date of Subcontract Award Completion Date Task(s) 1-4: See Subcontract Award

Completion Date Task(s) 5-7: See Bid Option Subcontract Award

A project schedule shall be submitted for approval by MSA covering activities for the duration of the subcontract. The schedule shall be in the form of a bar chart (P3, P6, or Microsoft Project

preferred, but not required) and shall identify logical sequence and relationship of activities for design, submittals, comment incorporation/disposition, and milestones. Activity durations shall be in working days (Monday through Thursday).

10.3 Payment Schedule

Milestone payments are as shown in Table 6 and Table 7 and released with final MSA approval of each task.



of 37


Table 6. Milestone Payments Tasks 1-4

At the Completion of: Percent of Payment

Task 1 35%

Task 2 26% Task 3 18%

Task 4 21%

Total 100%

Table 7. Milestone Payments Tasks 5-7 (Bid Option)

At the Completion of: Percent of Payment

Task 5 33%

Task 6 40%

Task 7 27%

Total 100%

11.0 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS

Reporting Administration

Status reports shall be submitted at the request of the BTR. The A/E shall provide status at the progress meetings.

Under no circumstances shall the Subcontractor interact directly with regulatory agencies prior to

notifying and obtaining the concurrence of the CS, the BTR, and the Director of Water and Sewer

Utilities.



of 37


APPENDIX A – SUBMITTAL REGISTER

Submittal Register Definitions

1. Numerical submittal sequence number: Example: 1, 2, 3, 4 … (or organized by topics and

project assigned coding structure).

2. Number of Copies and electronic and/or hard copy: Example: E (Electronic only), 6 (Six Hard

Copies), or Hard, 1: E, 1 (One Hard Copy, and Electronic).

3. Format: Describes the type of submittal required:

DWG An AutoCAD drawing using the Hanford standard formatting

(See MSC-PRO-ENG-16406, Off-Site Vendor Directions of the Preparation and Control of Engineering Drawings).

MFC Microsoft Format Compatible application (Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint)

P3 A Primavera Project Planner schedule

PDF Adobe Acrobat (Portable Document Format)

4. Submittal Type:

APW = Approval Required Prior to Work (Buyer must approve the A/E’s submittal prior to the A/E being authorized to proceed with any activity/work associated with the submittal).

AP = Approval Required (Buyer must approve the A/E’s submittal, however, work

associated with the submittal may proceed prior to Buyer approval).

5. Description / Document Title: Title or general description of the document.

6. Submittal Date: Actual date or number of Work Days before or after a milestone that a submittal

is due from the A/E: Example: June 1, 2005 or A + 24d [24 work days or 6 weeks after Award

of the Subcontract]

A Date of Award

KO Kickoff Meeting

30%/60%/90% Design Package Complete

SC Start of Construction

CC Construction Complete

7. Buyer Review Time (Work Days): Example: 8 Days

8. Subcontract Reference: Cross reference to the Subcontract requirement that defines this

submittal: Example: SOW 3.1.2.

9. Insert name of submittal approvers (after subcontract award).



of 37


Master Submittal Register:

The A/E shall meet the required schedule and provide the documents specified in accordance with the following submittals.

Subcontract Number: TBD Revision: 0

1. No.

2. No. of

Copies* (See End

Note)

3. Format

4. Type

5. Description / Document Title

6. Target

Submittal Dates (Work Days)

7. Buyer

Review Time

(Work

Days)

8. Subcontract

Paragraph or Requirement

Reference

1 1 PDF, MFC

AP Quality Assurance Program A + 4 4 SOW 7.3

2 1 P3, PDF,

MFC AP Design Schedule A + 8 4 SOW 10.2

3 1 PDF, MFC

AP Personnel Qualifications A + 8 4 SOW 8.1

4 1 PDF, MFC

AP Engineering Work Plan A + 8 6 SOW 6.6,

7.0

5 1 PDF, MFC

AP Commercial-off-the-Shelf Documentation A + 8 4 SOW 7.5

6 1 DWG, PDF,

MSC

APW Task 1 – 30% Design Package including native files

KO + 24 10 SOW 3.1

7 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 1 – 30% Design Requirements Compliance Matrix

KO + 24 4 SOW

App. B

8 1 DWG, PDF,

MFC

APW Task 2 – 60% Design Package including native files

30% + 28 12 SOW 3.2

9 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 2 – 60% Design Requirements Compliance Matrix

30% + 28 4 SOW 3.2



of 37



1.

No.

2.

No. of Copies* (See End

Note)

3.

Format

4.

Type

5.

Description / Document Title

6.

Target Submittal Dates

(Work Days)

7.

Buyer Review Time

(Work Days)

8.

Subcontract Paragraph or Requirement

Reference

10 1 MFC,

PDF AP Task 2 – 60% WDOH Project Report 30% + 28 8 SOW 3.2

11 1 DWG, PDF, MFC

APW Task 3 – 90% Design Package including native

files 60% + 32 10 SOW 3.3

12 1 MFC,

PDF AP

Task 3 – 90% Design Requirements Compliance

Matrix 60% + 32 4 SOW 3.3

13 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 3 – 90% WDOH Revised Project Report 60% + 32 8 SOW 3.3

14 1

DWG,

PDF, MFC

APW Task 4 – 100 % Final Design Package including native files

90% + 24 8 SOW 3.4

15 1 MFC, PDF

APW Task 4 – Construction Submittal Register 90% + 24 8 SOW 3.4

16 1 MFC,

PDF AP Task 4 – Final Stamped WDOH Project Report 90% + 24 4 SOW 3.4

17 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 4 – Design Verification Documentation 90% + 24 4 SOW 6.6



of 37


Bid Option


1. No.

2. No. of

Copies*

(See End Note)

3. Format

4. Type

5. Description / Document Title

6. Target

Submittal Dates

(Work Days)

7. Buyer Review

Time (Work

Days)

8. Subcontract

Paragraph or

Requirement Reference

18 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 5 – EJTA** Bid Option Award + 8

4 SOW 7.2

19 1 MFC, PDF

AP Task 6 – Test Documentation, O&M Manuals **

Bid Option Award + 24

8 SOW 3.6

20 1 DWG, PDF, MFC

AP Task 7 – As-Built Drawings including native

files** CC + 21 12

SOW 3.7,

6.4, 6.7

* For electronic submittals, the number of hard copies can be negotiated with the Contract Specialist and approved by the

BTR.

** Submittals not required until Bid Option is authorized for the A/E to proceed.



of 37


APPENDIX B - 30/60/90 DESIGN DELIVERABLES

General Expectations

30% Design Package – The A/E shall demonstrate their understanding of the FRDC and overall

objective of the project. The design documentation shall include the level of information required for MSA to evaluate whether the design is meeting project expectations, if a course correction may be required, or if the project requirements need re-evaluated. The documentation shall also demonstrate what additional information (drawings/documents)

will be required to complete the design and what MSA can expect to see in future design packages.

60% Design Package – MSA expects the 60% design package to be “biddable” and “buildable.” This means the package contains a sufficient amount of detail for a construction

subcontractor to estimate and bid the project, and build the project in the field. The 60% package should include, at minimum, a draft of each drawing sheet, specification, or calculation in a form that allows reviewers to understand how the design meets the FRDC and overall project intent. If certain details or information is omitted, a placeholder and

explanation shall be included.

90% Design Package – As stated in Section 6.6, MSA expects the 90% design package to be fully checked and ready for final issue/release and/or construction. In addition to technical adequacy, checking shall address drafting standard compliance, editorial errors,

and overall workmanship.

100% Design Package – MSA should not see any new information in the 100% design package. This deliverable shall incorporate any final comments submitted during the 90% review and be fully ready for issue and release including PE stamps as required.

General Order of Drawings:

1. Cover Sheet / Title Sheet 2. Plans / P&IDs / Electrical One-Line (high level view) 3. Elevations / Plan and Profile

4. Sections 5. Details 6. Schedules / Panel Schedules

NOTE: The below table represents the minimum expected deliverables to be included with each of the 30%, 60% and 90% design packages. The list may not be an all-inclusive list, as the design progresses additional deliverables may be identified by the project team and/or A/E.



of 37


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable

DRAWINGS

Drawing Lists, Design Package Cover Sheets and Title Sheets Complete List of Drawings for Final Package – The list of drawings,

specifications, calculations, etc. provided with the 30% design package will be used to obtain H-series drawing numbers, calculation and specification document numbers from the Hanford Document Numbering System

(HDNS). The numbers obtained through HDNS post-30% shall appear on the 60% design package.

Existing Drawings – 30% identify list of drawings to be modified and provide FMP drawings for drafting approach.

New Drawings – Existing drawings will be released using the FMP process. New drawings will be issued with a DCN. New and existing drawings shall appear in a format that will support the design package that will

issue/release them (e.g. Existing drawings may use the WAS/IS format with the typical FMP border, while new drawings will appear as full size sheets with the standard drawing border in accordance with HNF-14660). (See Section 6.4, MSC-PRO-ENG-2001 for FMPs and

MSC-PRO-ENG-8016 for DCNs).

FMP EP Information – MSA will initiate the EP and route the package for approval, but will require information from the A/E to complete the electronic form (see MSC-PRO-ENG-440 for information required for the EP).

DCN Cover Sheets – Current revision of Form A-6003-324 filled out completely and accurately. Form instructions are available.

Title Sheet / Drawing Index / General Notes and Legend

Civil Civil General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, and List of Civil Drawings

Civil Site Plan – including project boundary, call-outs for alignments, references to plan / profile drawing sheets, etc.

Enlarged Site Plan as needed

Plan / Profiles – Including any utilities (new and existing), invert elevations, profile slopes, grade (existing / proposed), separation distances, minimum cover requirements, pipe fittings and structures, stationing, bollards,

signage, etc.

Civil Details – Including schedules, cross sections, bollards, fire hydrant, signage, thrust blocks, etc.

Electrical Electrical General Notes, Legend, Abbreviations, List of Electrical Drawings

One-Line Diagram(s)



of 37


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable List Identifying Major Electrical Equipment / Components

Equipment Schedule – Incorporate 30% Electrical Equipment/Component

Electrical Equipment Label Schedule – Ref. EU-PRO-ENG-60779, Rev 1 Change 3, Equipment and Component Labeling

Conduit and Wire Schedule(s) – Include conduit fill.

Conduit Routing

Panel Schedule(s) – Including three-phase balance calculations.

IT / Telecommunications IT / Telecommunication General Notes, Legend and Abbreviations, List of IT

Drawings

Telecommunications Plan

Initial Telecommunication Equipment Schedule

Final Telecommunication Equipment Schedule

Drafting Preliminary Drafting Review – Provide at least one AutoCAD file per

discipline for review by MSA CAD organization for compliance with HNF-14660.

Detailed Drafting Review

Long Lead Procurement Items Identify Long Lead Procurement Items

Identify Major Pieces of Equipment

SPECIFICATIONS Draft Construction Specification – Construction specification shall follow the

CSI format. The 30% submittal shall be a fully annotated outline including as much standard information as available such as: applicable codes and standards, submittals, industry standard quality requirements, industry

standard testing and inspection requirements and other “boilerplate” information.

Construction Specification – The 60% construction specification should appear close to the final product. The 60% submittal will be reviewed for completeness and project-specific requirements and information.

Identify List of Procurement Specifications

Initial Draft of Long Lead Item Procurement Specification

Final Procurement Specification for Long Lead Procurement Items



of 37


30 60 90 Description of Deliverable Master Submittal Register for Construction – A submittal register in the

standard MSA format to be included in the construction SOW that is fully aligned with the final project construction specification.

CALCULATIONS Identify List of Calculations(s) (e.g. arc flash, electrical load, thrust block, pipe

supports, fire alarm battery and voltage drop, lighting level,

heating/cooling loads, heat dissipation, etc.)

Lightning Protection Risk Assessment in accordance with NFPA 780

Perform Calculation(s)

Draft Hydraulic Analysis

Final Hydraulic Analysis

Calculation Checklists – Submit Calculation Checklist Form A-6007-113 required to accompany each calculation for release. (See Section 6.4 and

MSC-PRO-ENG-8259 for more information)

TESTING DOCUMENTATION Test Plan Annotated Outline

Test Plan

Draft Test Procedure(s)

Draft Test Report

OTHER Design Requirements Compliance Matrix – Matrix of project design

requirements, which may come from a number of sources, such as: FRDC, specifications, codes, standards, environmental permits, etc. The matrix shall include, at a minimum, identification of each requirement, source of

the requirement, methodology used to verify the requirement (inspection, test, calculation, drawing, etc.), and ensure acceptance criteria has been established.

WDOH Project Report – To be developed and submitted to MSA in accordance with WAC 246-290-110. The final WDOH document will

require a PE stamp/signature.

NATIVE FILES Native Drawing Files –30/60

Native Drawing Files –90

Other Native Files - Native files for Word documents (.doc, .docx), excel (.xls, .xlsx), MathCAD, and any other native files. Native files (especially Word

files) assist MSA in the review process by allowing reviewers to provide tracked changes type comments.



of 37


APPENDIX C – DRAWING AND/OR DOCUMENT LIST

Existing Essential Drawings

Drawing No. Sht. Rev. Description Rel. Date

1. H-2-830460 001 02 Site Map Potable Water System 200 East Area Key Map 02/22/2018

2. H-2-830460 013 23 Site Map Potable Water System 200 East Enlarged Plan 06/03/2019



Existing Reference Drawings

Drawing No. Sht. Rev. Description Rel. Date

1. H-2-834005 001 01 Civil Site Plan & Drawing List 03/21/2011

2. H-2-834130 002 02 Civil Utility Plan 01/8/2015

3. H-2-834130 004 02 Civil Utility Plan 01/8/2015



of 37


Other

Document Number Rev. Description Rel. Date

1. HNF-FRDC-62970 00 Functional Requirements and Design Criteria, 12-in. Potable Water Loop-Line to WTP

05/2/2019

NOTE: This is not an all-inclusive list, there may be additional drawings and documents identified as the design progresses.



of 37


APPENDIX D – PRECONCEPTUAL LINE ROUTING

Statement of Work For Engineering Services...Statement of Work for Engineering Services RFP No....

Documents

Transcript of Statement of Work For Engineering Services...Statement of Work for Engineering Services RFP No....