State Vs. Pawan Kumar @ Vicky FIR No:342/2012 U/s...

State Vs. Pawan Kumar @ VickyFIR No:342/2012U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act P. S. Kalkaji/AATS/SED

27032015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused on bail along with counsel.

Statement of accused recorded today. Accused chosen not to lead

DE.

Final argument heard. Vide my separate judgment, dictated and

announced in the open court, accused Pawan Kumar @ Vicky is

acquitted for the offence U/s 25/54/59 of Arms Act.

On oral request for the counsel for accused, the previous

bail bonds of the accused are accepted in compliance of Section

437(A) of Cr.P.C. File be consigned to record room. File be consigned

to record room.

(VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/27032015

FIR No. 85/2008PS: EOW/New DelhiState vs. Pratap Singh etc.

27032015 (2:15 p.m.)Present: Niab Court for the State.

Since Ld. Regular APP for the state is on Half Day Leave (After

post lunch session), therefore, the matter is adjourned for consideration

and IO be called for 1642015.



FIR No. 257/07PS: Defence ColonyState vs. Kuldeep Singh(PO)

27032015 (2:40 p.m.)Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the State.

Accused is PO.

PW Kamal Kishore, Chief Manager, Vijay Bank and PW Sh.

Arvind Kumar Bhartiya are present. Since, Ld. Regular APP is on leave

after lunch session and ld. Substitute APP is busy in recording evidence in

other case. It is already 2:40 p.m. Aforesaid two witnesses are discharged

unexamined for today only. They along with other PWS be summoned for

PE on 562015.



FIR No. 208/2006PS: NFC/EOWState vs. Iqbal Parvez Siddiqui




and IO be called along with police file on 1742015.



FIR No. 416/13PS: Jamia Nagar/AATSState vs. Abdul Raheem etc.




and IO be called for clarifications on 1842015.



FIR No. 106/2010PS: Crime BranchState vs. Rashid


Accused absent.

NBWs issued against the accused and notice to his surety u/s

446 Cr.PC remained unexecuted. Reports perused. Issue fresh NBWs

against the accused Rashid and notice u/s 446 Cr.PC to his surety, through

IO concerned, for 1842015. PWS be also summoned for PE.



CC No:

Statement of

on oath.

RO&AC (VEENA RANI) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate

South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/

State Vs.

FIR No:

PW

Statement of

on oath.

Xxxxxxxxxby ld. Counsel for accused.



FIR No. PS: State vs.

Present: Ld. APP for the State.



FIR No. PS: State vs.




FIR No. 632/11PS: Jamia NagarState vs. Sanjeev Kumar

27.03.2015

PW 2: Ct. Ravinder PIS 28911818 PS Crime Branch, Kamla Market,

New Delhi.

On SA

On 12.2.12 I was posted at SOS, Crime Branch as Ct. On that

day I alongwith ASI Ragender and HC Deepak were investigating the

present case. During investigation accused Sanjeev got recovered one

motorcycle bearing no. 5565 and one car Indica bearing No. 0273 and one

car Honda City bearing No. 0432 from Dblock, Ashok nagar. I do not

remember the house number. IO prepared the seizure memo of motorcycle

of bearing no. DL 5SAF 5565 which is already Ex PW1/A bearing my

signature at point B.

At this stage witness request to refresh his memory. Allowed. Be

called after 10 minutes.

RO&AC


South East District / Saket Courts New Delhi/27.03.2015

FIR No. 632/11PS: Jamia NagarState vs. Sanjeev Kumar

27.03.2015

PW 2: Ct. Ravinder PIS 28911818 PS Crime Branch, Kamla

Market, New Delhi.(recalled after 10 minutes).

On SA

After recovery of two cars and one motorcycle accused Sanjeev

got other accused Babbal arrested from Welcome Metro station at about

10:00 PM. We returned back to our office. On 13.2.12 accused Babbal got

recovered two cars i.e (1) Lancer 5100 (2) I do not remember the other car

but it was not having any registration no. from Sant Nagar. On 15.02.2012

I alongwith ASI Ragender and HC Deepak went to Kithor Meerut to the

house of one Fariyad @ Fareed who was not present there however one I10

car was recovered from his house. We brought the car and deposited the

same in the Malkhana of Crime Branch.

At this stage Ld. APP seeks permission to cross examine the

witness as he is not remembering all facts of the prosecution case. Heard.

Allowed.

XXX by Ld APP for the State.

It is correct that our raiding team had met at ISBT. It is correct

that we had gone to house no. 1079, Gali No. 8, Ashok Nagar for

conducting raid. Discloser statement of Babbal and Sanjeev which are Ex

PW2/A and already Ex PW1/B bears my signatures at point A and point B

respectively. Seizure memo of Lancer car, Indigo car, Honda city car and

2

Indica car, Santro, Alto, Baleno, Tavera and I10 car which are Ex PW2/B

to Ex PW2/J all bearing my signatures at point A. Arrest memo and

personal search memo of Babbal and Sanjeev which are Ex PW2/K,

already Ex PW1/C, already Ex PW1/D and Ex PW2/L all bearing my

signatures at point A and B respectively.

Further cross examination is deferred for the want of case

property and identification of accused.

RO&AC



FIR No. 215/04PS: C.R. ParkState vs. Devkinandan Etc.

27.03.2015

PW4: WASI Jyoti PIS No. 28892748 PS Rajori Garden, New Delhi.

On SA

On 26.08.2004 I was posted as Ct. in LBR section EOW. On that

day Inspector R. C. Meena took me for a raid to 10A, Shatabdi Vihar,

sector 21, Noida where the accused namely Chandrakanta and R. P.

Prasad who were to be arrested were not present. However, we met their

daughter Shalu and Neeru were present. Inspector R. C. Meena told them

about the case and conducted search of the house. During search some

property related documents were recovered which were seized vide seizure

memo Ex PW4/A bearing my signature at point A. IO recorded my

statement.


witness as she is not remembering all facts of the prosecution case. Heard.

Allowed.


It is correct that copy of seizure memo was given to Shalu and

Neeru.

XXX by Sh. Kamal Bhardwaj Ld counsel for accused Gurmeet

Barar and Rameshwar.

Nil. Opportunity given.

XXX by Sh. Umesh Tomar Ld counsel for accused Chandrakanta.

2


XXXXX by accused Roop Chand.


RO&AC



FIR No. 215/04PS: C.R. ParkState vs. Devkinandan Etc.27.03.2015

PW5 Statement of Sh. Riyasat Ali S/o Sh. Rehmat Ali R/o H. No.

H269C, Hblock, Sector 12, Super MIG, Pratap Vihar, Vijay Nagar,

Gaziabad.

On SA

On person namely Devkinandan Gautam was residing in 266C,

Hblock, and he was known by the name of Guruji in the whole locality. He

was working as property dealer. About 8 or 10 years back police officials

came and took him alongwith them. I do not know anything else about this

case.



Allowed.


It is correct that I was doing the work of Plumber during that

time. It is correct that Devkinandan Gautam alongwith his family which

includes his son namely Gopal Gautam was residing in front of my house.

It is correct that Devkinandan Gautam was not known as Gurbachan Lal.

It is correct that during those period Devkinandan Gautam looked nervous

. I do not remember whether my statement was recorded or not.

XXX by Sh. Kamal Bhardwaj Ld counsel for accused Gurmeet

Barar and Rameshwar.


2

XXX by Sh. Umesh Tomar Ld counsel for accused Chandrakanta.


XXXXX by accused Roop Chand.


RO&AC



FIR No. 215/04PS: C.R. ParkState vs. Devkinandan Etc.27.03.2015

PW6 Statement of Sh. Mahesh Bhati S/o Sh. Om Prakash R/o Village

Aminabad (Niyana), Salempur, Gautam Buddh Nagar, UP.

On SA

I met Rajinder Pal in the year 2001 and at that time I was

supplying milk. Rajinder asked for loan so I introduced him to Surender

Kumar who gave a loan of Rs. 2,00,000/. For some time Rajinder used to

pay the interest of that amount but afterwords he stopped so Surender

contacted me. I asked Rajinder to pay back the money but he told that he

will sell one of his property at Mblock, Greater Kailash and then pay back

the loan amount. It was 20032004 when Rajinder asked me to come to

registrar office Kashmiri Gate alongwith Icard as he wanted to deal with

some property. I had signed on GPA as a witness. Thereafter nothing else

happened. I do not anything more about this case.



Allowed.


It is correct that GPA dated 10.01.1994 which is marked 6X

bears my signature at point A. It is correct that when I went to Kashmiri

Gate registrar office I met one person namely Gurbacchan Lal. It is correct

that I came to know that Gurbacchan Lal alongwith other persons had

sold a property to one person namely Sehgal and Milakraj after preparing

2

some forged documents. It is correct that they had taken Rs. 28,00,000/

from Sehgal and Milakraj. It is correct that Sehgal and Milakraj came to

me and told that their money was not refunded by Rajinder Pal so I must

make his understand to return back my money. It is correct that when I

talked to Rajinder Pal he told that his wife Chandrakanta and her brother

Sewa Ram were dealing with the matter and I must not intervene in this

matter. It is correct that Rajinder asked from his wife and they entered

into an argument over this issue. However, he told that he had taken Rs.

28,00,000/. It is correct that Chandrakanta used to change her residence

frequently. It is correct that IO recorded my statement in this case. I can

identify accused Chandrakanta if shown to me.

Further examination chief is deferred for identification of accused

Chandrakanta.

RO&AC



FIR No. 297/08PS: H. N. Din Crime BranchState vs. Anil Ratan

27.03.2015

PW4 Statement of Ex Ct. Ajay Rana recalled for further cross

examination after 29.01.2015.

On SA

I cannot tell the time when secret informer came to our office

and informed regarding the secret information and it may be known only

to HC Rajeev Mohan. I was carrying my own arms and ammunition. It is

correct that judicial file is not having the details of weapons in my

possession as the same is available in the Malkahan register. I cannot tell

the room number in which secret informer approached to HC Rajeev

Mohan, there is no numbering given to rooms of SOS office.

Further cross examination is deferred as it is lunch time.

RO&AC



CC No. 449/1Ishak Khan versus Rajeev Aggarwal

27.03.2015

Present: Counsel for the complainant.

Counsel for the proposed accused.

In the order dated 10.05.13 passed by Sh. Vinay Kumar Khanna,

Ld. ASJ, the case was remanded back with the directions to hear the

complainant after obtaining report from the SHO PS Sangam Vihar.

In compliance of the said order, report be called from the SHO

PS Sangam Vihar for 18.05.15.



FIR No. 308/04State versus Ishak Khan etc.

27.03.2015


Accused Ishaque Khan and Mahender Singh on bail with

Counsel.

Accused Udaybir is absent.

Process of accused Udaybir received back with the report that he

is in JC in Faridabad jail.

In view of the said report, issue production warrants against the

accused Udaybir as per the details furnished in the warrants for 18.05.15.



CC No. 17/01Jasper Infotech versus Arjun Chouhan

27.03.2015


ASI Ravinder Kumar in person.

Status report filed. As per the report the present complaint has

been sent back to DCP, South East on 02.02.15 on the point of jurisdiction.

Let action taken report be called from DCP, South East for

14.04.15.



CC No. 174/1Kirin Suri versus State

27.03.2015


IO in person.

Counsel for the complainant.

IO is directed to file the status report with regard to the

resignation letter on 25.05.15.



FIR No. 09/11PS: GKI, Crime Branch State vs. Adarsh Kumar etc.

27.03.2015


All accused on bail with their respective Counsels.

Vakalatnama filed on behalf of accused Girish Mehra, Harish

Mehra and Nidhi Mehra.

IO is not present. However IO has sent the request on the

ground that he is on medical rest for 10 days.

Copy of the application u/s 91 CrPC is not supplied to the

accused persons. Same be supplied.

An application u/s 207 CrPC is also pending. Since the IO is not

present, IO be called with deficient copies and reply to the application u/s

91 CrPC on 15.05.15.



FIR No. 17/12PS: EOW State vs. Sudesh Kumar Arora etc.

27.03.2015


IO is not present. However he has sent exemption application in

which it is mentioned that the order of quashing of the FIR has already

been passed on 16.03.15, subject to the release of money deposited by the

accused with the trial court.

Since no such order has been received, IO be called for

clarifications on 15.04.15.



FIR No. 123/07PS: OIA State vs. Dalip Singh Rawat etc.

27.03.2015


Both accused on bail with their respective Counsels.

An application u/s 207 CrPC is moved on behalf of the accused

Saurabh Chander.

IO be called with deficient copies on 12.05.15.



FIR No. 88/11PS: CR Park State vs. Somnath Sapra etc.

27.03.2015


All accused on bail.

However adjournment sought on behalf of the accused persons

on the ground that their Counsels are not available and they have to

prepare for arguments on charge.

Heard the submissions.

Case be fixed for arguments on charge on 21.05.15.



CC No. 13/01Ramesh Kumar Kapur versus Anil Kumar Kapur CW 7, Shyam Sunder, Assistant Manager at Indian Bank, 10174/1, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. On SA

I have brought the letter dated 26.03.15 written by the Chief

Manager of Indian Bank, 10174/1, Naiwala, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. I have

brought the document handling and retention policy, 201415 of our bank

and also copy of register folio containing records related to old records

destroyed on 23.09.04 by our branch. The copy of aforesaid documents

attested by Chief Manager, India Bank is Ex. CW 7/C (collectively).

I submit that the documents pertaining to account maintained at

our branch by Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd has been destroyed on

23.09.04. There is no document available pertaining to accounts

maintained by Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd with our branch. I

undertake that I shall bring a certificate from the Chief Manager of our

branch stating that the documents pertaining to Napco Bevel Gears of

India Ltd has been destroyed as aforesaid.

It is further stated that on 23.09.04 the documents pertaining to

account of Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd has been destroyed till the year

1994. The documents pertaining to aforesaid account from 1994 onwards is

still being searched and shall be produced before this Court.

Further examination deferred for want of abovesaid document.



CC No. 13/01Ramesh Kumar Kapur versus Anil Kumar Kapur CW 8, Sunder Lal, Single Window Operator / Clerk, at Allahabad Bank, New Industrial Town, NIT, Faridabad, Haryana. On SA

I have been instructed to submit before this Hon’ble Court the copy

of the documents of account maintained by Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd

at my aforesaid bank. I have brought photocopy of statement of account of

Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd from 1992 to 31.12.99. The copy of the said

documents are running into 36 pages and are marked as A collectively. The

further statement of account of Napco Bevel Gears of India Ltd and also

some other statement are missing which I may produce on the next date of

hearing.

Further examination deferred for want of abovesaid documents.



CC No. 13/01Ramesh Kumar Kapur versus Anil Kumar Kapur

27.03.2015


Further examination of CW 7 Shyam Sunder and CW 8 Sunder

Lal are partly recorded. Their further examination deferred for want of

certain documents.

Put up for remaining CE on 30.05.15. Let concerned witness

from Bank of Patiala and Income Tax with relevant record be called on

filing of PF for date fixed alongwith CW 7 Shayam Sunder and CW 8

Sunder Lal.



FIR No. 07/05U/s 25 Arms ActPS Amar Colony, AATS

CHARGE

I, Veena Rani, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, South East District, Saket

Courts, New Delhi, do hereby charge you Irfan @ Chenu S/o Mehrajuddin as

under :

That on 03.01.15 at about 5:30 am at Red light, Okhla Mandi, Captain

Gaur Marg, New Delhi, within jurisdiction of PS Amar Colony, AATS, you were found

having in possession of one desi katta and three live cartridges in contravention of

notification issued by Delhi Administration and thereby committed an offence

punishable under section u/s 25 Arms Act and within my cognizance.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this court for the above said

offence.

(Veena Rani) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate South East District, Saket Courts New Delhi/27.03.15

The Charge has been put and explained to the accused in simple Hindi. He is questioned as under:Q. Do you plead guilty or claim trial?A. I plead not guilty and claim trial.

RO&AC (Veena Rani) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate South East District, Saket Courts New Delhi/27.03.15

FIR No. 07/05U/s 25 Arms ActPS Amar Colony, AATS

27.03.15


Accused produced from JC alongwith Sh. Gautam Chakravarty,

Counsel for the accused from Legal Aid.

Heard on charge. Prima facie case is made out against the accused u/s

25 Arms Act. Charge framed. Accused does not plead guilty. Put up for PE on

16.04.15, rehnumai on 10.04.15. PWs be summoned for date fixed.

At this stage it is submitted by the Counsel for the accused from Legal Aid

that bail application of accused is pending for today.

Heard on the application.

It is submitted by the Counsel for the accused that accused was arrested

on 03.01.15 and thereafter he was sent to JC and since then he has been languishing

in JC. Moreover investigation in the present matter has already been completed and

chargesheet has also been filed, hence accused be admitted on bail.

On the other hand the present bail application of the accused has been

vehemently opposed by the Ld. APP for the State on the ground that accused is a

habitual offender and if he is admitted on bail he may try to influence the witnesses.

Heard the submissions. Keeping in view that the investigation in the

present matter has already been completed, charge sheet has been filed and

cognizance has already been taken and that the accused is languishing in JC since

last about 2 months, no purpose would be served to keep the accused behind the

bars, hence accused is admitted on bail on furnishing bail bond in a sum of Rs.

20,000/ alongwith one surety in the like amount.

Bail bond not furnished. Accused be sent to JC.

(Veena Rani) Chief Metropolitan Magistrate South East District, Saket Courts New Delhi/27.03.15

FIR No. 1033/06PS: Kalkaji, Crime Branch State vs. SD Sharma

Statement of complainant Sh. Jai Bhagwan, Age 62 years, S/o DS Sharma, R/o B104, Vijay Nagar, Bawana, Delhi – 39

I am the complainant in the present case. I have settled the

present matter with the accused for a sum of Rs. 2,50,000/. Out of the said

amount I have already received a sum of Rs.50,000/ from the accused and

today I have received the balance amount of Rs.2,00,000/ by way of

demand draft bearing no. 390030 dated 12.03.15 for Rs. 1,00,000/ and

another demand draft bearing no. 390028 dated 12.03.15 for Rs.1,00,000/,

totalling Rs. 2 lacs, both drawn on Kotak Mahindra Bank. Now nothing

remains pending against the accused after receiving the full and final

payment from the accused. I have no objection of the present case is

compounded. The offence may be disposed off as compromised /

compounded in relation to my grievance against the accused. I am giving

the statement voluntarily and without any undue influence.



FIR No. 214/01PS: OIA, Crime Branch State vs. Raja Ram

27.03.2015


Both accused on bail with proxy Counsel.

Time sought for arguments on charge as main Counsel is not

available today.

Submissions heard.

Put up for arguments on charge on 16.05.15.



FIR No. 342/12 U/s 25 Arms Act PS: Kalkaji, AATS State versus Pawan Kumar

Statement of accused Pawan Kumar @ Vicky S/o Raj Kumar , u/s

313 CrPC in the manner prescribed u/s 281 CrPC, without oath

All the incriminating circumstances appearing in evidence

against the accused are put to you that on 01.11.12 at about 08:30 pm in

front of Metro station, Nehru Place, New Delhi you were found in

possession of one country made pistol alongwith two live cartridges Ex. P1

to P2. The sketch of the country made pistol and live cartridges is Ex. PW

1/A, which were seized vide memo Ex. PW 1/B with the seal of VS. You

were arrested vide arrest memo Ex. PW 1/C and your personal search was

conducted vide memo Ex. PW 1/D. Rukka Ex. PW 4/A was prepared by SI

Vikram and on which FIR Ex. PW 2/B was registered. Site plan Ex. PW

8/A was prepared by SI Ehtsham Abbas and thereafter he recorded your

disclosure statement Ex. PW 8/B.

Q: What do you have to say ?

Ans. I have been falsely implicated in the present case and the witnesses

who have deposed against me are interested witnesses. I have nothing to

do with the above said offence. I am innocent. That nothing has been

recovered from me nor at my instance.

Q. Do you want to lead defence evidence?

Ans. No. I do not want to lead my DE.

RO&AC CMM/SED/ND/27.03.15

Certified that the above statement of accused was recorded in

my presence and hearing and the above records contains the true the full

account of the statement made by the accused.


South East District, Saket Court New Delhi/27.03.15

FIR No. 73/11PS: KalkajiState vs. Rajender 27.03.2015


Accused absent.

Proxy Counsel for the accused who has moved an exemption

application on behalf of the accused.

It is pertinent to mention here that from the last 4 / 5 dates of

hearing accused is not appearing and he is being exempted from personal

appearance.

On last date of hearing in the morning session accused was not

present, however his proxy Counsel was present who moved an exemption

application on his behalf and and matter was fixed for evidence for 12:30

pm as one witness was present and Ld. APP for the State was busy in

recording evidence in some other case. At 12:30 pm when the matter was

called again neither accused was present nor his Counsel or proxy Counsel

were present and NBWs were issued against the accused and today also

neither accused is present nor his Counsel is present, however proxy

Counsel is moving an exemption application on behalf of the accused.

In view of the aforesaid, exemption application of the accused is

dismissed. Issue fresh NBW against the accused with notice to his surety

through IO concerned for 29.04.15.



RC No. 3 (S)9/95CBI versus Rajiv Khanna etc.

27.03.2015

Present: Ld. APP for the CBI.

All accused on bail.

One of the Regular Stenographer is on leave today and other

Stenographer is busy in recording evidence. Hence case is fixed for

recording SA on 13.04.15.



FIR No. 25/08PS: HN Din, Crime Branch State vs. Raj Pratap Saxena etc.

27.03.2015


Both accused absent.

Counsel for the both the accused persons.

PW HC Rajkumar is present for his evidence.

An exemption application moved on behalf of both the accused.

In view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is

allowed for today only.

As both the accused persons are not present, PW present is

discharged unexamined for today only.

Put up for remaining PE on 18.04.15. PWs be summoned for

date fixed.



FIR No. 215/04PS: CR Park State vs. Devkinandan etc. 27.03.2015 Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Proceedings against the accused Devki Nandan Gautam stands

abated vide order dated 15.01.15.

IO Inspector SM Sharma in person.

Remaining accused on bail with their respective Counsels except

accused Chandrakanta and Roop Chand.

Accused Roop Chand is also present on bail.

An exemption application moved on behalf of accused Chandrakanta.

In view of the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed for

today only with directions to produce the accused on the next date of hearing.

Examination of PW 4 Lady ASI Jyoti is recorded. Cross examined on

behalf of accused Gurmeet Barar and Rameshwar. Opportunity granted to

Counsel for the accused Chandrakanta and accused Roop Chand to cross examine

the witness which is nil.

Examination of PW 5 Riyasat Ali is recorded. Opportunity granted to

Counsel for the accused Gurmeet Barar, Rameshwar, Chandrakanta and accused

Roop Chand to cross examine the witness which is nil.

Examination in chief of PW 6 Mahesh Bhati is partly recorded. His

further examination in chief deferred for identification of accused Chandrakanta.

No other PW is present. Put up for remaining PE on 02nd June, 15.

PWs be summoned for date fixed.



FIR No. 86/11PS: Crime Branch State vs. Abhishek Kaushik etc.

27.03.2015

File taken up today on an application of the accused Hiren

Manilal Nagar to travel out of India


Counsel for the applicant / accused.

Counsel for the accused seeks adjournment for filing itinerary.

In view of the same put up on 30.03.15.



FIR No. 297/08PS: H. N. Din Crime BranchState vs. Anil Ratan

PW4 Retired Constable Ajay Rana recalled for further cross examination

after lunch time.

On SA

XXXX by Sh. Sanjay Sharma, Counsel for the accused.

I do not remember whether all the members of the raiding team

were present at the time DD entry was prepared. It is correct that the DD

entry number 8 dated 27.08.08 is the true copy of departure entry which

is now mark PW 4/DA. It is correct that as per the DD entry first I went to

A Block, Sant Nagar alongwith SI PC Yadav and thereafter I went to

Sarai Kale Khan alongwith SI PC Yadav directly but I do not remember

the exact time when we reached at the spot. It is correct that as per DD

entry the time mentioned in it is 2:05 pm. (Vol.) Better clarifications

regarding DD entry will be given by SI PC Yadav. HC Raghender Singh

took the personal search of the accused. I cannot tell what else except

revolver were recovered from the accused. The recovery memo and sketch

of the revolver were prepared at the spot only. I do not remember who

wrote the FIR number on the recovery memo and sketch of the revolver. It

is wrong to suggest that all recovery memo and sketch of the revolver were

prepared at the police station. I cannot tell where and when the disclosure

statement was recorded. It is correct that no FSL slip is on judicial record.

I cannot tell gender of the public persons to whom IO asked for joining the

investigation. The public persons refused to give their names and

addresses on the asking of the IO. The seal was handed over to me after

putting it on the pulanda of the revolver and same was handed over back

to the IO on the same day. It is further wrong to suggest that I am

deposing falsely at the instance of the IO. It is wrong to suggest that

accused has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further wrong to

suggest that accused was apprehended from the house of his friend at

Dhankari colony. It is also wrong to suggest that it is a concocted story.



DD No. 13 PS: Crime Branch State vs. Kamal Upadhyay

27.03.2015

Application for releasing the vehicle bearing no. DL3CBM 6891

on superdari.


None for the applicant.

IO is not present, however request received on his behalf. In

view of the same IO be called again for 01.04.15.



MCA No. 43/14Bank of Maharashtra versus M/s Summit Aviation

27.03.2015

Present: Counsel for the applicant.

It is submitted by the Counsel for the applicant that matter is

still pending before the Ld. DRT for settlement and the next date of

hearing is 11.04.15.

Submissions heard.

Put up for purpose of settlement / further proceedings on

21.04.15.



FIR No. 422/01 PS: NFC, Crime Branch State vs. Om Dutt Sharma etc.

27.03.2015

File taken up today on an application of the accused Om Dutt

Sharma and Manmohan Swaroop Bhatnagar for cancellation of NBWs


Counsel for both the accused persons.

Both the accused persons are absent.

However in view of the facts and circumstances as stated in the

application NBWs issued against the abovesaid accused persons are stayed

till next date of hearing with the directions to produce the accused persons

on next date of hearing.

Copy of the order be given to the Counsel for the accused

persons as prayed for.



FIR No. 297/08PS: H. N. Din Crime BranchState vs. Anil RatanPW 5, ASI Raghender, No. 3560 East, East District Line, Farsh Bazar, New Delhi. On SA

On 27.08.08 I was posted at SOS, Crime Branch, Sunlight Colony. I

was instructed by Inspector KP Singh in the evening to go to Sarai Kale Khan as

a team there has under custody an accused for further investigation. I left at

around 8:30 pm from the office and reached at the spot at about 8:45 pm. I met

SI PC Yadav, HC Rajeev Mohan, HC Narender, HC Kuldeep, Constable Ajay

Rana, Constable Devender and Constable Vikal at the spot and they have taken

accused Anil Rattan (who is present in the court and correctly identified) in

custody. It was disclosed to me by HC Rajiv Mohan that accused was caught with

the six round revolver and handed over the sealed pulanda with the seal of RM of

the revolver to me. I do not remember the seal. Thereafter seizure memo of

revolver, sketch of the revolver and accused was handed over to me by HC Rajeev

Mohan, first IO. I interrogated the accused where he made his disclosure

statement which is already Ex. PW 4/A bearing my signatures at point X. I

prepared the sketch plan at the instance of first IO which is already Ex. PW 2/DA

bearing my signatures at point X. Thereafter I arrested the accused vide arrest

memo Ex. PW 5/A bearing my signatures at point X and his personal search

was also conducted vide personal search memo Ex. PW 5/B bearing my signatures

at point X. Then Constable Ajay Rana brought the rukka and copy of FIR from

the police station at the spot. Then I deposited the pulanda in the malkhana and

deposited the copies of seizure memo and personal search also. Then I came to

the office alongwith the accused and recorded the report of the arrest of the

accused in the office and informed Inspector KP Singh about the investigation.

Then information of arrest of the accused was given to his family members and

next day his medical examination was got conducted at the Safdarjung hospital.

Thereafter accused was sent to JC from Patiala House Courts.

On 10.09.08 I sent the pulanda of the revolver to FSL through

constable Ajay Rana. I recorded the statement of Constable Ajay Rana and he

said that he did not made any tampering with the sealed pulanda and deposited

it safely and in fit condition in the FSL. Thereafter charge sheet was filed in the

court.


I made departure entry at the office while leaving for the spot on

27.08.08 at 8:30 pm. It is correct that no such entry is on the judicial record.

Inspector KP Singh orally instructed me to leave for the spot in the SOS office

and no written order was received from Inspector KP Singh to this effect.

Further cross examination deferred as no time left.



FIR No. 632/11PS: Jamia Nagar State vs. Sanjiv Kumar

27.03.2015


Accused Babbal Aggarwal has already been discharged vide

order dated 16.07.13

Accused Sanjiv Kumar absent.

An exemption application moved on behalf of accused. In view of

the reason mentioned in the application the exemption is allowed for today

only with directions to produce the accused on next date of hearing.

Examination in chief of PW 2 Constable Ravinder is partly

recorded. His further examination in chief deferred for want of case

property and identification of the accused. MHCM is directed to produce

the accused on next date of hearing.

Put up for remaining PE on 23.05.15.



FIR No. 632/05PS: Kalkaji State vs. SD Sharma

27.03.2015


Accused on bail.

Accused seeks adjournment for arguments on charge as today

his Counsel is not available today.

Submissions heard.

Put up for arguments on charge on 06.05.15.



FIR No. 297/08 PS: HN Din, Crime Branch State vs. Anil Rattan

27.03.2015

Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the State.

Accused on bail with Counsel.

PW 4 Ex Constable Ajay Rana is cross examined during the pre

lunch session as well as post lunch session.

PW 5 ASI Raghender is examined and partly cross examined

and further cross examined deferred as no time left. No other PW is

present. PW 5 ASI Raghender is bound down for next date.

Put up for remaining PE on 30.03.15. PWs be summoned for

date fixed.



FIR No. 297/08PS: H. N. Din Crime BranchState vs. Anil RatanPW 5, ASI Raghender, No. 3560 East, East District Line, Farsh Bazar, New Delhi. On SA

On 27.08.08 I was posted at SOS, Crime Branch, Sunlight Colony. I

was instructed by Inspector KP Singh in the evening to go to Sarai Kale Khan as

a team there has under custody an accused for further investigation. I left at

around 8:30 pm from the office and reached at the spot at about 8:45 pm. I met

SI PC Yadav, HC Rajeev Mohan, HC Narender, HC Kuldeep, Constable Ajay

Rana, Constable Devender and Constable Vikal at the spot and they have taken

accused Anil Rattan (who is present in the court and correctly identified) in

custody. It was disclosed to me by HC Rajiv Mohan that accused was caught with

the six round revolver and handed over the sealed pulanda with the seal of RM of

the revolver to me. I do not remember the seal. Thereafter seizure memo of

revolver, sketch of the revolver and accused was handed over to me by HC Rajeev

Mohan, first IO. I interrogated the accused where he made his disclosure

statement which is already Ex. PW 4/A bearing my signatures at point X. I

prepared the sketch plan at the instance of first IO which is already Ex. PW 2/DA

bearing my signatures at point X. Thereafter I arrested the accused vide arrest

memo Ex. PW 5/A bearing my signatures at point X and his personal search

was also conducted vide personal search memo Ex. PW 5/B bearing my signatures

at point X. Then Constable Ajay Rana brought the rukka and copy of FIR from

the police station at the spot. Then I deposited the pulanda in the malkhana and

deposited the copies of seizure memo and personal search also. Then I came to

the office alongwith the accused and recorded the report of the arrest of the

accused in the office and informed Inspector KP Singh about the investigation.

Then information of arrest of the accused was given to his family members and

next day his medical examination was got conducted at the Safdarjung hospital.

Thereafter accused was sent to JC from Patiala House Courts.

On 10.09.08 I sent the pulanda of the revolver to FSL through

constable Ajay Rana. I recorded the statement of Constable Ajay Rana and he

said that he did not made any tampering with the sealed pulanda and deposited

it safely and in fit condition in the FSL. Thereafter charge sheet was filed in the

court.


I made departure entry at the office while leaving for the spot on

27.08.08 at 8:30 pm. It is correct that no such entry is on the judicial record.

Inspector KP Singh orally instructed me to leave for the spot in the SOS office

and no written order was received from Inspector KP Singh to this effect.

Further cross examination deferred as no time left.



FIR No. 830/14 PS: KalkajiState vs. Amit Gupta

27.03.2015

Bail application of accused Amit Gupta.

Present: Ld. Substitute APP for the State.

IO in person.

Counsel for the complainant.

Counsel for the accused.

Arguments heard.

Put up for orders on 30.03.15.



State Vs. Pawan Kumar @ Vicky FIR No:342/2012 U/s...

Documents

Transcript of State Vs. Pawan Kumar @ Vicky FIR No:342/2012 U/s...