State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special...

18
State Performance Plan (SPP) State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASE October 18, 2007

Transcript of State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special...

Page 1: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

State Performance Plan (SPP) State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR)Annual Performance Report (APR)

Dana CorriveauBureau of Special Education

Connecticut State Department of Education

ConnCASE October 18, 2007

Page 2: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

2

CT State Performance Plan Six year plan that describes the state’s performance on 20

indicators under Part B of IDEA (15 relate directly to LEAs)

Required by IDEA, more alignment with NCLB

Establishes baseline data and targets for each year with improvement activities at the state and local levels

Submitted to the US Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) in December 2005 – we are entering the 3rd year of the plan

Must report state level progress to OSEP every year on all indicators 1-20 (Annual Performance Report - APR)… due February 1, 2008

Page 3: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

3

CT State Performance Plan There are “compliance” indicators – targets are 100% or 0%

(9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 20)

There are “monitoring” indicators – we have to oversee and investigate on an ongoing basis (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 20)

There are “performance” indicators – targets change each year (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8)

Some are still “new” and do not have targets or improvement activities (7, 14)

Developed with broad stakeholder input (local school officials, Department personnel, parents, other state agencies) to develop targets and improvement activities

Page 4: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

4

Section 616 Determinations In accordance with Section 616 of the

statute, the Secretary will make determinations upon a state Meets Requirements Needs Assistance Needs Intervention Needs Substantial Intervention

District’s data impacts the state determination, effects how we are monitored by OSEP, direction of funds

Section 616 also says the state must enforce determinations upon LEAs with the same categories as above

Page 5: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

5

District Annual Performance Report Besides our State APR to OSEP in February, we must publicly

disseminate data for every district

States must also make a determination upon LEAs in the same 4 categories that OSEP used

District Annual Performance Report

Compares district data against state target

Will include a determination that triggers enforcement actions: Notify districts about sources of TA Develop and implement a corrective action plan Withhold or redirect funds Designate as a high risk grantee with imposing conditions on

funds

Page 6: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

6

District Annual Performance Report Use this data to guide change

This is about being able to understand where there are problematic areas and how to improve outcomes for students with disabilities in that area

Page 7: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

7

District APR 2005-06 data , issued September 2007

Two parts: SPP indicators under IDEA PJ Goals under the Settlement

Agreement

Two separate determinations processes (but similar)

Page 8: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

8

District APR 2005-06 data , issued September 2007

The district level APR displays data for all SPP indicators 1 – 15, 20 (unless not possible to do so)

Some indicators set an increasing target (Indicator 11 – Evaluation Timelines)

Some indicators set a decreasing target (Indicators 9 & 10 – Disproportionality)

Refer to the SPP for specific targets

Page 9: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

9

District APR 2005-06 data , issued September 2007

The IDEA determination for 2005-06 data was made ONLY on the following SPP compliance indicators:

Indicator 9 – Disproportionate representation in special education Indicator 10 – Disproportionate representation in special education by

disability

Indicator 11 – Evaluation timelines

Indicator 12 – FAPE at 3

Indicator 15 – General Supervision (2 parts) 15A: Noncompliance corrected within 1 year

Page 10: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

10

District APR 2005-06 data , issued September 2007

In order to Meet Requirements, the district’s data had to Either meet/exceed the state target OR Be in substantial compliance (95%-99%

performance)

There cannot be any outstanding noncompliance identified through focused monitoring or other general supervision activities

Page 11: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

11

District APR 2006-07 data , issued February 2008

Same indicators used for determinations in 2005-06 (9, 10, 11, 12, 15A)

Addition of Indicator 13 – Secondary Transition Goals and Services compliance indicator, target = 100%

Page 12: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

12

District APR 2007-08 data , issued December 2008 Same as used in 2006-07

Addition of Indicator 15B – Significant Disproportionality

Addition of Indicator 20 – Timely & Accurate Data (check out the SPP website for the Data Collection Calendar!)

This is the year that you can make a difference!

Page 13: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

13

Significant Disproportionality: 15B States are required to examine data to

determine whether significant disproportionality based on race or ethnicity is occurring in districts, with respect to: identification, including within disability categories placement of children in particular educational settings incidence, duration, and type of disciplinary actions,

including suspensions and expulsions

See your Appendix A for a more detailed explanation

Page 14: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

14

Significant Disproportionality: 15B The finding of significant disproportionality

is done through an analysis of the data alone (disproportionality in indicators 9 & 10 are determined after a review of policy/procedures/practice to determine if there is inappropriate identification going on)

If significant disproportionality is found, the state will require the LEA to reserve 15% of its IDEA funds for early intervening services (EIS)

Page 15: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

15

Indicator 20 – Timely & Accurate Data District level data is submitted in a timely and

accurate manner, according to state deadlines, which includes the following data collections:

SEDAC Oct. 1 Child CountEvaluation Timelines

Early Childhood Outcomes PJ Data ED 166 Discipline Data Dispute Resolution Data,

Exiters (PSIS and SEDAC)

check out the SPP website for the Data Collection Calendar!

Page 16: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

16

PJ Determinations Also included on the district level APR document

Separate but similar process

Based ONLY on students with ID (indicator 5 is based on all students with disabilities – two different numbers)

Regular class placement = those students who are in regular classes 80-100% of the day

Mean TWNDP = the average of all your students’ with ID, time with non-disabled peers

Page 17: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

17

More Information

District level APR Appendix A Appendix B SPP website

Bureau of Special Education(860) 713-6910

Page 18: State Performance Plan (SPP) Annual Performance Report (APR) Dana Corriveau Bureau of Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education ConnCASEOctober.

18

More Information