State of Place Demo
-
Upload
state-of-place -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
4.436 -
download
0
Transcript of State of Place Demo
STATE OF PLACETM
State of Place is an urban data analytics platform that enables placemakers to identify and economically justify
optimal urban design, planning, and development projects
TrainingCustomers can opt to engage the community to take part in data collection.
Benefits: Foster community engagement and facilitate an effective public participation and communication platform.Training is provided to ensure the objectiveness of the data: a training video guides raters through the data collection process; the training quiz “certifies” raters to collect data.
Customers can also opt to have us handle the data collection process.
Module 1:Intersections
Module 2:Land Uses
Module 3:Ped & Bike
Infrastructure
Module 4:Buildings
Module 5:Maintenance
Module 6:Traffic
Features
Module 7:Architecture/
Design
Module 8:Dynamic
Street Elements
Choose a training module
Module 1:Intersections
Module 2:Land Uses
Module 3:Ped & Bike
Infrastructure
Module 4:Buildings
Module 5:Maintenance
Module 6:Traffic
Features
Module 7:Architecture/
Design
Module 8:Dynamic
Street Elements
Choose a training module
Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 1 of 10
Are there monuments or markers including neighborhood entry signs that indicate that one is entering a special district or area?
Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 2 of 10
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
2a. Consider the places on the segment that are intended for pedestrians to cross the street. Are these places marked for pedestrian crossing? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross.
Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 3 of 10.
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
All
Some
None
NA
3a. Are there curb cuts at all places where crossing is expected to occur? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross.
Data Collection
Collect data using our State of Place app.Data is collected at the block level; it takes approximately 10-15 minutes/block
Very Low
State of Place™ Index Tied to Economic Value
0 - 20 Low
Moderate
Good
Very Good21 -
40
41 - 60
61 - 80
81 - 100
*PREMIUMS FOR EACH
LEVEL INCREASE
+ $9 SF OFFICE RENTS
+ $7 SF RETAIL RENTS
+80% RETAIL REVENUES
+ $300 UNIT RES. RENT
+$81 SF FOR-SALE RES. VALUE
+ $37 sq. ft. Office Rents+ $30 sq. ft. Retail Rents+340% Retail Revenues
+ $1281/Unit Residential Rent+$347 sq. ft. For-sale
ResidentialState of Place™ Index: 90, Very Good
State of Place™ Index: 5, Very Low
Priorities
The State of Place Index calculates a community’s assets and needs – its built environment performance. We then identify priorities by factoring in:
Performance Goals Potential Impact of Implementing ChangesFeasibility of Implementing ChangesCommunity’s Stated Preferences (optional)
Goals & Preferences
Goals: Stakeholders are asked to rate the importance of economic & walkability outcomes relative to their goals
Preferences: App automatically collects data on levels of satisfaction with and perception of importance of existing built environment features
Rank each goal from 1 -10
9
|
2
7
5
3
Walkability
Office Rent
Retail Rent
Retail Sales
Residential For Sale Market
Residential Rental Market
Average Community Preferences
4.3
7.1
6.3
9.5
7.4
Density
Connectivity
Form
Proximity to Destinations
Parks & Public Spaces
Recreational Facilities
Pedestrian & Bike Amenities
Traffic Safety
Aesthetics
Personal Safety
5.7
8.8
7.5
9.3
8.6
Top 3 Priorities Based on All Goals
#1 Priority Based on Top Goal
#1 Priority Per Goal
Choose Type of Recommendation
Priorities Ranked Based on Top Goal
Priorities Ranked Per Goal
Platform conducts “multi-criterion assessment” to identify top priorities.
Example, Walkability as a Goal:
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact*
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
*Impact scores listed here are for explanatory purposes only; the actual impact scores are proprietary.
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact*
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
Performance score is based on State of Place Index, calculated using the State of Place algorithm
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact*
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
Ranking is based on customer-inputted ranking (1-10) for each goal or outcome
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
Impact score is based on empirical, peer-reviewed research linking State of Place with a variety of outcomes
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
Feasibility is measured from 1 – 4, with 1 being the most challenging built environment features to address and 4 being the least challenging
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
The community score, which is optional, is based on input from data collectors regarding their level of satisfaction with and the importance of built environment features
Dimension Performance
Ranking for Goal (Walkability)
Impact
Feasibility
Community
Score
Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces
23.5 9 .6342
7.4873.0
Recreational Facilities
13.4 9 .5482
5.7854.2
Pedestrian Amenities
55.4 9 .8133
8.6979.0
Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5
Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0
The final score is calculated by multiplying all factors. The highest score translates to the top priority.
Top Goal: Walkability
#1 Priority: Traffic Safety
Urban Design Features Report
See Design Guidelines
Run Spatial Analysis
Traffic Safety Features Report
Traffic Feature Percent Present
Crosswalks 60
White Painted Lines 89
Colored Painted Lines 10
Zebra Stripes 30
Textured Surface 9
Curbcuts 40
Pedestrian Signals 55
Top Goal: Walkability
#1 Priority: Traffic Safety
Urban Design Features Report
See Design Guidelines
Run Spatial Analysis
Choose Up To Three Dimensions To Compare
Density
Form
Connectivity
Proximity
Parks & Public Spaces
Recreational Facilities
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities
Traffic Safety
Aesthetics
Personal Safety
✓
✓
✓
Parks & Public Spaces
$80,000
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities
Traffic Safety
Add Park
Add Plaza
New Plaza Park Maintenance
Arcades
Benches
Sidewalk Buffers
Street Trees Sidewalk Buffers
Crosswalks
Curbcuts
Midblock Crossing
Pedestrian Countdown
CurbCuts
Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost
Select Interventions
Com. property tax
For-sale residential
Office rents
Retail rents
Residential rents
Res. property taxes
Vacancy Rates
Retail Rents
Enter Baseline
Select Goal
Calculate Predicted ROI
Parks & Public Spaces
$80,000
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities
Traffic Safety
$300,000 $150,000
$1.09/sf $0.89/sf
Park Maintenance Sidewalk Buffers Curbcuts
$1.43/sf
Predicted ROI: Retail Rents
+4.3% +3.1% +3.7%
Impact on State of Place Index
Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost
Enter Project Information
Neighborhood 1
$1,800,000
Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1
Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
Com. property tax
For-sale residential
Office rents
Retail rents
Residential rents
Res. property taxes
Vacancy Rates
Retail Rents
Enter Baseline
Select Goal
Calculate Predicted ROI
Neighborhood 1
$1,800,000
Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1
$2,700,000 $2,300,000
$1.43/sf $0.99/sf
Project 1 Project 2 Project 3
$1.56/sf
Predicted ROI: Retail Rents
+6.0% +2.0% +11.0%
Impact on State of Place Index
Map It
Dimension Type of Analysis
Density
Form
Connectivity
Form
Driveways
Number of Buildings
Parking Lots
Setbacks
Parking Lots
Mean
Curbcuts
Percent Present
Segments with 0
Median
Choose Parameters
Urban Design Feature
65%
Result
Map It