State of Place Demo

61
STATE OF PLACE TM Demo

Transcript of State of Place Demo

STATE OF PLACETM

Demo

STATE OF PLACETM

State of Place is an urban data analytics platform that enables placemakers to identify and economically justify

optimal urban design, planning, and development projects

1. Training2. Data3. SaaS Platform

PrioritizeScenario PlanningAnalytics

TrainingCustomers can opt to engage the community to take part in data collection.

Benefits: Foster community engagement and facilitate an effective public participation and communication platform.Training is provided to ensure the objectiveness of the data: a training video guides raters through the data collection process; the training quiz “certifies” raters to collect data.

Customers can also opt to have us handle the data collection process.

Module 1:Intersections

Module 2:Land Uses

Module 3:Ped & Bike

Infrastructure

Module 4:Buildings

Module 5:Maintenance

Module 6:Traffic

Features

Module 7:Architecture/

Design

Module 8:Dynamic

Street Elements

Choose a training module

Module 1:Intersections

Module 2:Land Uses

Module 3:Ped & Bike

Infrastructure

Module 4:Buildings

Module 5:Maintenance

Module 6:Traffic

Features

Module 7:Architecture/

Design

Module 8:Dynamic

Street Elements

Choose a training module

Module 1: Intersections

Watch Video Take Quiz

Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 1 of 10

Are there monuments or markers including neighborhood entry signs that indicate that one is entering a special district or area?

Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 2 of 10

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

2a. Consider the places on the segment that are intended for pedestrians to cross the street. Are these places marked for pedestrian crossing? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross.

Quiz 1: Intersections, Q 3 of 10.

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

All

Some

None

NA

3a. Are there curb cuts at all places where crossing is expected to occur? Mark N/A if there are no intended places to cross.

You have completed the State of Place training!

Your State of Place app unlock code is: 33165

Data Collection

Collect data using our State of Place app.Data is collected at the block level; it takes approximately 10-15 minutes/block

Data is exported into a csv file into our server

Data is processed using statistical software

Your State of Place Index

is:

76!

See your State of Place

Profile

Your State of Place Profile!

Run Analytics

Very Low

State of Place™ Index Tied to Economic Value

0 - 20 Low

Moderate

Good

Very Good21 -

40

41 - 60

61 - 80

81 - 100

*PREMIUMS FOR EACH

LEVEL INCREASE

+ $9 SF OFFICE RENTS

+ $7 SF RETAIL RENTS

+80% RETAIL REVENUES

+ $300 UNIT RES. RENT

+$81 SF FOR-SALE RES. VALUE

+ $37 sq. ft. Office Rents+ $30 sq. ft. Retail Rents+340% Retail Revenues

+ $1281/Unit Residential Rent+$347 sq. ft. For-sale

ResidentialState of Place™ Index: 90, Very Good

State of Place™ Index: 5, Very Low

SaaS Platform

Identify Priorities

State of Place Index

State of Place Profiles

Scenario Analysis

Run Analytics

Priorities

The State of Place Index calculates a community’s assets and needs – its built environment performance. We then identify priorities by factoring in:

Performance Goals Potential Impact of Implementing ChangesFeasibility of Implementing ChangesCommunity’s Stated Preferences (optional)

Goals & Preferences

Goals: Stakeholders are asked to rate the importance of economic & walkability outcomes relative to their goals

Preferences: App automatically collects data on levels of satisfaction with and perception of importance of existing built environment features

Enter Goals

Compute Community Preferences

See Recommendations

Rank each goal from 1 -10

9

|

2

7

5

3

Walkability

Office Rent

Retail Rent

Retail Sales

Residential For Sale Market

Residential Rental Market

Enter Goals

Compute Community Desire

See Recommendations

Average Community Preferences

4.3

7.1

6.3

9.5

7.4

Density

Connectivity

Form

Proximity to Destinations

Parks & Public Spaces

Recreational Facilities

Pedestrian & Bike Amenities

Traffic Safety

Aesthetics

Personal Safety

5.7

8.8

7.5

9.3

8.6

Enter Goals

Enter Community Desire

See Recommendations

Top 3 Priorities Based on All Goals

#1 Priority Based on Top Goal

#1 Priority Per Goal

Choose Type of Recommendation

Priorities Ranked Based on Top Goal

Priorities Ranked Per Goal

Platform conducts “multi-criterion assessment” to identify top priorities.

Example, Walkability as a Goal:

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact*

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

*Impact scores listed here are for explanatory purposes only; the actual impact scores are proprietary.

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact*

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

Performance score is based on State of Place Index, calculated using the State of Place algorithm

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact*

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

Ranking is based on customer-inputted ranking (1-10) for each goal or outcome

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

Impact score is based on empirical, peer-reviewed research linking State of Place with a variety of outcomes

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

Feasibility is measured from 1 – 4, with 1 being the most challenging built environment features to address and 4 being the least challenging

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

The community score, which is optional, is based on input from data collectors regarding their level of satisfaction with and the importance of built environment features

Dimension Performance

Ranking for Goal (Walkability)

Impact

Feasibility

Community

Score

Density 76.5 9 .432 1 4.3 91.4Form 65.4 9 .543 1 7.1 169.1Connectivity 55.8 9 .342 1 6.3 136.0Proximity 74.3 9 .765 2 9.5 353.9Parks & Public Spaces

23.5 9 .6342

7.4873.0

Recreational Facilities

13.4 9 .5482

5.7854.2

Pedestrian Amenities

55.4 9 .8133

8.6979.0

Traffic Safety 43.1 9 .745 3 8.8 1144.5

Aesthetics 58.4 9 .436 4 7.5 962.3Personal Safety 71.3 9 .512 4 9.3 529.0

The final score is calculated by multiplying all factors. The highest score translates to the top priority.

Top Goal: Walkability

#1 Priority: Traffic Safety

Urban Design Features Report

See Design Guidelines

Run Spatial Analysis

Traffic Safety Features Report

Traffic Feature Percent Present

Crosswalks 60

White Painted Lines 89

Colored Painted Lines 10

Zebra Stripes 30

Textured Surface 9

Curbcuts 40

Pedestrian Signals 55

Top Goal: Walkability

#1 Priority: Traffic Safety

Urban Design Features Report

See Design Guidelines

Run Spatial Analysis

Traffic Safety Spatial Analysis

Identify Priorities

State of Place Index

State of Place Profiles

Scenario Analysis

Run Analytics

Compare Interventions

See Recommendations

Compare Projects

Choose Up To Three Dimensions To Compare

Density

Form

Connectivity

Proximity

Parks & Public Spaces

Recreational Facilities

Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities

Traffic Safety

Aesthetics

Personal Safety

Parks & Public Spaces

$80,000

Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities

Traffic Safety

Add Park

Add Plaza

New Plaza Park Maintenance

Arcades

Benches

Sidewalk Buffers

Street Trees Sidewalk Buffers

Crosswalks

Curbcuts

Midblock Crossing

Pedestrian Countdown

CurbCuts

Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost

Select Interventions

Com. property tax

For-sale residential

Office rents

Retail rents

Residential rents

Res. property taxes

Vacancy Rates

Retail Rents

Enter Baseline

Select Goal

Calculate Predicted ROI

Parks & Public Spaces

$80,000

Pedestrian & Bicyclist Amenities

Traffic Safety

$300,000 $150,000

$1.09/sf $0.89/sf

Park Maintenance Sidewalk Buffers Curbcuts

$1.43/sf

Predicted ROI: Retail Rents

+4.3% +3.1% +3.7%

Impact on State of Place Index

Compare Interventions

See Recommendations

Compare Projects

Enter Project Cost Enter Project Cost

Enter Project Information

Neighborhood 1

$1,800,000

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1

Project 1 Project 2 Project 3

Com. property tax

For-sale residential

Office rents

Retail rents

Residential rents

Res. property taxes

Vacancy Rates

Retail Rents

Enter Baseline

Select Goal

Calculate Predicted ROI

Neighborhood 1

$1,800,000

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 1

$2,700,000 $2,300,000

$1.43/sf $0.99/sf

Project 1 Project 2 Project 3

$1.56/sf

Predicted ROI: Retail Rents

+6.0% +2.0% +11.0%

Impact on State of Place Index

Map It

Predicted ROI Impact of Proposed Projects

Identify Priorities

State of Place Index

State of Place Profiles

Scenario Analysis

Run Analytics

Individual Urban Design Features

Analytics

Explore Indices

Dimension Type of Analysis

Density

Form

Connectivity

Form

Driveways

Number of Buildings

Parking Lots

Setbacks

Parking Lots

Mean

Curbcuts

Percent Present

Segments with 0

Median

Choose Parameters

Urban Design Feature

65%

Result

Map It

Parking Lots

Individual Urban Design Features

Analytics

Explore Indices

40

Choose Index

State of Place

Curbcuts

Food Desert

Create Custom Index

Aging In Place

STATE OF PLACETM

[email protected]