State land – opportunities for urban development...
Transcript of State land – opportunities for urban development...
State land – opportunities for urban development parnerships
SA Cities Network SeminarMarch 2007
2
State land holdings in cities
• Large percentage of urban land owned by state– Public Works departments– State Owned Enterprises– Municipalities
• Of this, large percentage is no longer core to government • Strategic urban land holdings
– Underutilised and degraded– Strategic location and potential for urban expansion– Major investment needed to unlock value– Private sector cannot do it alone
3
SOE properties
• SOEs are in a process of focusing on core business, divesting themselves of assets and enterprises that are non core
• In 2005/06 the Department of Public Enterprises and the SOEs conducted an audit of all non-core properties, and examined optimal ways in which to dispose of these properties
• R2b worth of non-core properties identified• Non-core property holdings have been classified into commercial and
non-commercial properties, as follow:
Property PortfolioProperty Portfolio
CoreCore
Non-coreNon-core
Disposal to GovernmentDisposal to Government
Housing Housing
SaleSale
DevelopmentDevelopment
Non-Commercail
Non-Commercail
CommercailCommercail
4
Non-Core Property Share by SOE
Denel20%
Eskom13%
SAA0%
Transnet67%
TransnetDenelEskomSAA
5
Spread of SOE Non-Core PropertiesLegend
Number of Non-Core Properties per Location1 - 2
3 - 6
7 - 10
11 - 15
16 - 23
SA railway
SA ProvincesEastern Cape
Free State
Gauteng
KwaZulu-Natal
Lesotho
Mpumalanga
North West
Northern Cape
Northern Province
Western Cape
30 March 2006
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Bloemfontein
Touwsrivier
De Doorns
Kimberley
Breyton
Upington
De Aar
Vryheid
PECoega
Durban
Pretoria
Saldanha
Cape Town
Mossel Bay
East London
Beit Bridge
Richards Bay
Johannesburg
6
Major urban development opportunities• Newtown North Precinct, Johannesburg
Extension of cultural precinct and link with Braamfontein and Gautrain station• OR Tambo Airport
Development opportunities linked to major expansion of passenger and cargo terminals
• Kaserne / City Deep Inland PortOpportunity for logistics hub development with Eskom and Transnet land
• Durban Port and Non-port related sitesPoint, Victoria Embankment and NMR development projects being led by Ethekwinimetro
• East London CBDSleeper Site and Signal Hill offer opportunity to reconfigure CBD and waterfront
• Port Elizabeth HarbourMove of port activities to Coega will enable integration of city and port spaces
• Culemborg Black-River, Cape TownTransnet land acts as bottleneck on city, development could achieve greater urban efficiency and expansion of CBD
7
Newtown North precinct
OR TAMBO AIRPORT
9
Kaserne / City Deep
Major Transnet and Eskom land holdings clustered around inland port in Kaserne / City Deep area
10
Embankment development could further open up city / port interface
Point development is leading urban regeneration linked to port
Bay Head land degraded and underutilised –
major opportunity for
urban expansion
11
East London CBD
Sleeper Site and Signal Hill in city centre are the key link areas
between the city, the port and the sea, and offer the
opportunity to reconfigure the orientation of the city
12
PORT ELIZABETH
Managanese dump and tank farm are
“dirty” port activities that logically belong in
Coega
13
NATIONAL PORTS AUTHORITYNATIONAL PORTS AUTHORITY
V&AWV&AW
TRANSNETTRANSNET
Transnet property in Cape Town
14
Cape Town: Culemborg / Black River site
15
Developing non-core property
• Major SOE land holdings in cities are a significant opportunity for development
• SOE’s do not have the capacity or mandate to develop these properties
• New partnerships needed to take this land into development process, with– local authorities and development agencies– developers and property funds– consumers and residents
• Municipalities can play key role in unlocking land & initiating development processes
16
Provision of infrastructure services
Construction of improvements
PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
PROFESSIONFEESPROJECTMANAGELANDENABLECOSTS
Property in current transport usezoning, improvements & infrastructure to support historic use
DEVELOPED PROPERTY TO END USERDEVELOPED PROPERTY TO END USER
Acquisition of alternative land use rightsdevelopment rights to support mixed alternative land use
Marketresearch
Viabilitystudy
ContextPrecinctPlan
TownPlanning
Developframework
RezoneSurvey
PROPERTYHOLDINGCOSTMANAGEFEE
ELECTRICSEWERAGEWATERROADSSTORMTELECOM
BRICKSMORTORCONSTRUCTION
MARKETINGSALESLEASINGADVERTISING
17
Capital requirements
• All of the property developments identified require:– Capital for holding costs;– Capital for preparation costs;– Large scale investment in infrastructure to realise value; – Specialised capacity for creating maximum value
To deliver these requirements most efficiently and optimise urban development impact, partnerships with urban developers, property funds and financial institutions needed
18
Options for local development
• Municipalities, government development agencies and private sector have key roles to play in each of these steps
• Options for the enablement of the land in key projects include
– Direct disposal to property developers & funds
– Joint ventures with developers
– Special purpose vehicles
– Municipal Development Agencies
– Direct development by property development vehicle under PIC
19
Partnerships for development?
• MFMA and PFMA, while strengthening sound fiscal management, have limited local initiative and creativity
• Relationships with private sector increasingly limited to clearly defined contractual relationships
• Designing and managing procurement processes is now the critical skills gap
• Partnerships not useful if limited capacity in Local Authority to engage in partnership– but partnerships could focus on strengthening core municipal
functions in relation to a development process
20
Partnerships for development?
• Tendency to focus on interesting new stuff (LED, IDPs, PPPs, partnerships) while neglecting the essentials
• Not a substitute for getting the basics of municipal service delivery in place– Land use management system, with efficient processing of
applications– Bulk and reticulated services– Public health, environment and waste management
• Most important municipal contribution to partnerships is leading a process for a shared and consensual vision for development
21
Conclusion
• Municipalities can play a key role in unlocking non-core state land for development
• Be realistic, focus on the basics first• Partnerships not a solution in themselves, rather
a means to an end• Outcome based partnerships?
– Each party focuses on clear set of deliverables in pursuit of an agreed common set of outcomes