State Engineer’s Report Update on

SUBJECT TO REVISION

Wyoming Water Development Commission/Select Water Committee Joint Meeting Ramkota Hotel, 800 N. Poplar St.

Casper, WY November 9, 10, and 11, 2016

November 9, 2016 1:30 p.m. (Wednesday) Workshop Agenda:

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Wyoming State Engineer’s Report

Colorado River Report

4. Update on “Bark Beetles, Snow Sublimation and Forest Water Budgets: Surprising Findings Improve Predictive Understanding” – Dr. Brent Ewers

5. Financial Status Report (A)

6. Funding Applications – Preliminary Review (B)

November 10, 2016 8:30 a.m (Thursday) Joint Meeting Agenda:

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call & Recognition of members to establish quorum

3. Approval of Agenda

4. Approval of Minutes (C)

August 24, 2016 WWDC/SWC Workshop

August 26, 2016 WWDC Meeting Minutes

August 26, 2016 SWC Meeting Minutes

October 24, 2016 WWDC Meeting Minutes (Possibly Dec)

5. Audience Introductions

6. Closeout of Planning Projects (D)

Byron Master Plan, Level I

Cowley Master Plan, Level I

Deaver Irrigation District Master Plan, Level I

Dry Creek Irrigation District Master Plan, Level II

Heart Mountain Canal Rehabilitation, Level II

High Meadow Ranch Study, Level II

LeClair Irrigation District Master Plan, Level I

Opal Master Plan, Level I

Sublette Creek Reservoir, Level II, Phase II

Upper North Platte River Watershed Study, Level I

SUBJECT TO REVISION

7. Update of Level III Construction Projects (E)

8. Planning Amendments

Clearmont Test Well, Level II Study, Amendment No. 1 (F)

Nowood River Storage Study, Level II, Amendment No. 5 (G)

9. 2017 Funding Recommendations – New Development (See Recommendation Notebook) Account I, Level III, II, I

10. 2017 Funding Recommendations – Dam & Reservoir Program (See Recommendation Notebook) Account III, Level III, II, I

November 11, 2016 8:30 a.m (Friday) Joint Meeting Agenda:

11. 2017 Funding Recommendations – Rehabilitation Program (See Recommendation Notebook) Account II, Level III, II, I

12. Director’s Comments

13. Future Meeting Schedule (H)

December 14-15, 2016 Cheyenne – WWDC

December 16, 2016 Cheyenne – SWC

14. Adjourn

SUBJECT TO REVISION

Attachment to the Agenda

November 10, 2016 (Thurs) 8:30 a.m. Joint Meeting Agenda Attachment: New Development Program – Account I Level III Projects

Cody Tank 2017 (A) Cowley Tank 2017 (B) Gillette Regional Extensions 2017 (C) Glenrock Transmission Pipeline 2017 (D) High Meadow Ranch Well, Tank & Pipeline 2017 (E) Lake DeSmet – Purchase of Storage (F) Opal Well Improvements 2017 (G) Pineview Tank & Booster Pump 2017 (H) Pioneer Transmission Pipeline 2017 (I) Thayne Tank 2017 (J) Weather Modification Wind River Mountains 2018 (K) Wheatland Wells 2017 (L)

Level III Projects – Amendments

Gillette Madison Pipeline (M) Gillette Regional Extensions – Phase II (Mc) Lance Creek Well Connection (N) Laramie North Side Tank (O) Riverton Water Supply (P) Small Water Projects – New Development (Q) Sponsor’s Contingency Fund – New Development (R)

Level II Projects

Big Horn Regional Southern Water Supply (S) Broken Wheel Ranch Groundwater Supply (T) Buffalo Groundwater Supply (U) Douglas Test Well Study (V) First Mesa & Stateline Canal Enlargements (W) GR/RS/SC JPWB Wind River Zone Study (XYZ) Rolling Hills Groundwater Supply (A2)

Level I Projects

Beaver Creek Watershed Study (B2) Bitter Creek/East Flaming Gorge Watershed Study (C2) Greybull River Watershed Study (D2) Hog Island Water Master Plan (E2) Horse Creek Watershed Study (F2) Lower Laramie River Watershed Study (G2) Middle Big Horn River Watershed Study (H2) Niobrara/Lower North Platte Watershed Study (I2)

General

Statewide Water Research (J2)

SUBJECT TO REVISION

Dams and Reservoirs Program – Account III Level III Projects

Big Sandy Reservoir Enlargement (K2) Middle Piney Reservoir (L2) Alkali Creek Reservoir (M2) Leavitt Reservoir Expansion (Mc2)

Level II Projects

Big Wind River Storage Study, Phase II (N2) Greybull Valley Irrigation District Storage Enlargement, Phase II (O2) Little Wind River Storage Study, Phase II (P2) New Fork Lake Dam Enlargement (Q2) Stateline Dam Enlargement, Phase II (R2) West Fork Reservoir, Phase III (S2)

November 11, 2016 (Fri) 8:30 a.m. Joint Meeting Agenda Attachment: Rehabilitation Program – Account II Level III Projects

Casper CY Booster Station Replacement 2017 (T2) Deaver Irrigation District Flume Replacement/Laterals 2017 (U2) Dry Creek Irrigation Pipeline Replacement 2017 (V2) Eden Valley Irrigation District SCADA 2017 (W2) Goshen Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2017 (XYZ2) Heart Mountain Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2017 (A3) Midvale Pilot 27.0 A Lateral 2017 (B3) Midvale Sand Butte G Lateral 2017 (C3) Shoshone Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2017 (D3) Sidon Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2017 (E3) Thermopolis Pipeline Replacement 2017 (F3)

Level III Projects – Amendments

Dull Knife Reservoir Spillway Rehabilitation (G3) LeClair Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2016 (H3) Small Water Projects – Rehabilitation (I3) Sponsor’s Contingency Fund – Rehabilitation (J3)

Level II Projects

Cody Canal Laterals (K3) Kirby Ditch Rehabilitation (L3) Wheatland Irrigation District Tunnel Dam Rehabilitation (M3)

Level I Projects

Hanover Irrigation District Master Plan, Phase II (Mc3) LaPrele Irrigation District Master Plan (N3)

WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS August 2016

Nick Bettas (D) (3/1/19) Water Division IV 1328 Uinta Drive Kemmerer, WY 83101 (H) 877-3402 (C) 679-4494 [email protected] Karen Budd-Falen (R) (3/1/17) Member-at-Large Budd-Falen Law Office 300 East 18th Street Cheyenne, WY 82001 P.O. Box 346, 82003-0346 (W) 632-5105 Ext. 106 [email protected] Floyd Canfield (R) (3/1/17) Water Division II Box 952 Sundance, WY 82729 (H) 283-2062 (C) 290-2062 [email protected] David Evans (D) (3/1/19) Water Division I 2837 Deming Blvd. Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 (W) 634-1525 [email protected] Clinton W. Glick (R) (3/1/18) Wind River Indian Reservation P.O. Box 1308 Fort Washakie, WY 82514 (W) 307-349-9183 (C) 307-349-0103 [email protected] Sheridan Little (R) (3/1/19) Water Division II P.O. Box 165 Leiter, WY 82837 (C) 620-0923 [email protected] William B. Resor (D) (3/1/17) Water Division IV 4445 Moose Wilson Road Wilson, Wyoming 83014 (H) 733-3240 Jeanette Sekan (D) (3/1/19) Water Division III 150 Southfork Road Cody, WY 82414 (C) 899-3660 [email protected] Rodney K. Wagner (R) (3/1/17) Water Division I 3715 Road 86 Lingle, WY 82223 (H) 837-2786 [email protected] Todd L. Werbelow (R) (3/1/17) Water Division III 3495 Road 12 Greybull, WY 82426 (H) 762-3547 (C) 272-2527 [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]









Revised 08/11/16


COMMISSIONERS Nick Bettas, Vice-Chairman Water Division IV Karen Budd-Falen Member-at-Large Floyd Canfield Water Division II David Evans Water Division I Clinton W. Glick Wind River Indian Reservation Sheridan Little, Chairman Water Division II William Resor Water Division IV Jeanette Sekan Water Division III Rodney Wagner Water Division I Todd Werbelow, Secretary Water Division III

STAFF Harry LaBonde Director Andrea Odell Administrative/Fiscal Manager Janet Belmonte Accountant Nancy Casner Office Support Specialist Barry Lawrence Deputy Director – Planning Kevin Boyce Project Manager Jeni Cederle Project Manager Keith Clarey Project Manager Dave Myer Project Manager Jodie Pavlica Project Manager Katie Talbott Outreach Coordinator Chace Tavelli Project Manager Jodee Pring Supervisor-River Basin Planning Peter Gill Project Manager Jason Mead Deputy Director – Dams & Reservoirs Andrew Linch Project Manager Tony Rutherford Project Manager Brian Smith High Savery Dam Technician Bryan Clerkin Deputy Director – Construction Dale Anderson Project Manager Bill Brewer Project Manager Keith Brookshire Project Manager Keenan Hendon Project Manager Wade Verplancke Project Manager Ken Mitchell Project Manager

ADVISORS Abigail Boudewyns Attorney General’s Office Pat Tyrrell State Engineer Greg Kerr University of Wyoming Shawn Reese Wyoming Business Council

SELECT WATER COMMITTEE

REVISED 3/14/16

SNJJ/Select Water Committee

Senator Gerald Geis (R) Chairman S. Big Horn/Hot Springs/Park/Washakie Counties [email protected] 600 Holly Avenue Worland, WY 82401 (H) 347-6443 [email protected] Senator Stan Cooper (R) Lincoln/Uinta/Sublette/Sweetwater Counties 417 Agate Street Kemmerer, WY 83101 (H) 877-6450 [email protected] Senator Dan Dockstader (R) Lincoln/Teton/Sublette Counties P.O. Box 129 Afton, WY 83110 (H) 886-1500 (W) 885-5727 [email protected] Senator Ogden Driskill (R) Crook/Weston/E. Campbell Counties P.O. Box 155 Devils Tower, WY 82714 (H) 467-5555 (C) 680-5555 [email protected] Senator John Hastert (D) Sweetwater County P.O. Box 472 Green River, WY 82935 (H) 875-6967 [email protected] Senator Curt Meier (R) Goshen/Niobrara/Weston Counties [email protected] 4721 County Road 18 LaGrange, WY 82221 (H) 834-2344 (C) 630-2023 [email protected]

Representative Robert McKim (R) Vice-Chairman Lincoln County 10964 Wyo. 238 Afton, WY 83110 (H) 885-3733 (W) 885-9999 [email protected] Representative Stan Blake (D) Sweetwater County P.O. Box 774 Green River, WY 82935 (H) 875-3779 [email protected] Representative John Eklund (R) Laramie County 2918 U.S. Highway 85 Cheyenne, WY 82009 (H) 246-3251 [email protected] Representative Hans Hunt (R) Weston County 1347 Old Highway 85 Newcastle, WY 82701 (H) 746-8899 [email protected] Representative David Northrup (R) Park County 799 Lane 13 Powell, WY 82435 (H) 754-2190 (W) 272-0617 [email protected] Representative Jerry Paxton (R) Carbon County P.O. Box 692 Encampment, WY 82325 (H) 327-5373 [email protected]















Water Development Account IPreliminary Fiscal Projections as of 8/1/2016

Cash Balance 6/30/15 104,768,556

FY16 Revenues

Taxes 19,297,500Interest 2,058,218Loans/Interest 6,800,787General Fund 1,500,000Other 479,647

Total Revenues 30,136,152

FY16 Expenditures

Total Expenditures (24,637,832)

Cash Balance 6/30/16 110,266,876

Outstanding Commitments 7/1/16

Active Appropriations (177,718,455)Expenditures Paid 66,752,573

Total Commitments 7/1/16 (110,965,882)

Total Uncommitted Balance 7/1/16 (699,006)

FY17 Anticipated Revenues

Buffalo Bill Dam Account Transfer 7,000,000Taxes 19,300,000Interest 2,000,000Other 2,500,000

Total FY17 Anticipated Revenues 30,800,000


Taxes 19,300,000Interest 2,000,000Other 2,500,000


Subtotal Anticipated Revenues 54,600,000

Balance Available for Appropriation 53,900,994

1

Water Development Account IIPreliminary Fiscal Projections as of 8/1/2016

Cash Balance 6/30/15 28,558,230

FY16 Revenues

Taxes 3,255,000Interest 562,998Loans/Interest 1,524,085


FY16 Expenditures


Cash Balance 6/30/16 28,489,010


Active Appropriations (55,212,311)Expenditures Paid 24,828,759


Total Uncommitted Balance 7/1/16 (1,894,542)


Taxes 3,300,000Interest 400,000Other 1,000,000



Taxes 3,300,000Interest 400,000Other 1,000,000




2

Water Development Account IIIPreliminary Fiscal Projections as of 10/1/2016

Cash Balance 6/30/15 158,763,754

FY16 Revenues

General Fund* 9,332,500Taxes 775,000Interest 3,225,819


FY16 Expenditures


Cash Balance 6/30/16 170,390,410


Active Appropriations (31,979,000)West Fork Reservoir Reversion 6,221,974Expenditures Paid 7,348,864


Total Uncommitted Balance 7/1/16 151,982,248


Taxes 800,000Interest 2,200,000



Taxes 800,000Interest 2,200,000




*Per Session Law 2016, Chapter 31 Section 300(e), $10,000,000 was diverted from Water Development Account III and transferred to the General Fund.

3

2017 Session

WWDC Recommendations

New Development Program - WDA I

Tab Item Project Title Priority Requested Recommended Comments Fund

Funding Funding Balance

53,900,994$

Level III Projects

A 1 Cody Tank 2017 4 2,412,000$ 2,412,000$

B 2 Cowley Tank 2017 4 3,155,700$ 3,155,700$

C 3 Gillette Regional Extensions 2017 5 361,800$ 361,800$ Design only

D 4 Glenrock Transmission Pipeline 2017 4 254,000$ 254,000$

E 5 High Meadow Ranch Well, Tank & Pipeline 2017 6 1,991,910$ 1,991,910$

F 6 Lake DeSmet - Purchase of Storage 8 4,500,000$ 4,500,000$

G 7 Opal Well Improvements 2017 4 4,690$ $0

H 8 Pineview Tank & Booster Pump 2017 6 368,500$ 368,500$

I 9 Pioneer Transmission Pipeline 2017 5 1,246,200$ 1,246,200$

J 10 Thayne Tank 2017 4 589,600$ 589,600$

K 11 Weather Modification Wind River Mtns 2018 155,000$ 155,000$

L 12 Wheatland Wells 2017 3 994,950$ 994,950$

Subtotal 16,034,350$ 16,029,660$ 37,871,334$

Level III Projects - Amendments

M 13 Gillette Madison Pipeline 3 -$ -$ 3 yr time extension

Mc 14 Gillette Regional Extensions - Phase II 5 1,675,000$ 1,675,000$

N 15 Lance Creek Well Connection 5 (170,000)$ (170,000)$ Cancel the project

O 16 Laramie North Side Tank 4 7,303,000$ 7,303,000$

P 17 Riverton Water Supply 4 -$ -$ 3 yr time extension

Q 18 Small Water Projects - New Development -$ -$

R 19 Sponsor's Contingency Fund - New Development -$ -$ 8 yr time extension

Subtotal 8,808,000$ 8,808,000$ 29,063,334$

Level II Projects

S 20 Big Horn Regional Southern Water Supply 6 180,000$ 180,000$

T 21 Broken Wheel Ranch Groundwater Supply 6 350,000$ -$ Not a public entity

U 22 Buffalo Groundwater Supply 3 180,000$ 180,000$ Redundant supply

V 23 Douglas Test Well Study 3 1,205,000$ 1,205,000$

W 24 First Mesa & Stateline Canal Enlargements 3 190,000$ 190,000$ Canals are privately owned

XYZ 25 GR/RS/SC JPWB Wind River Zone Study 4 180,000$ 180,000$

A2 26 Rolling Hills Groundwater Supply 3 750,000$ 750,000$ Redundant supply

Subtotal 3,035,000$ 2,685,000$ 26,378,334$

Level I Projects

B2 27 Beaver Creek Watershed Study 1 300,000$ 300,000$

C2 28 Bitter Creek/East Flaming Gorge Watershed Study 1 300,000$ 300,000$

D2 29 Greybull River Watershed Study 1 325,000$ 325,000$

E2 30 Hog Island Water Master Plan 6 165,000$ 165,000$ No public entity

F2 31 Horse Creek Watershed Study 1 300,000$ 300,000$

G2 32 Lower Laramie River Watershed Study 1 325,000$ 325,000$

H2 33 Middle Big Horn River Watershed Study 1 325,000$ 325,000$

I2 34 Niobrara/Lower North Platte Watershed Study 1 300,000$ 300,000$

Subtotal 2,340,000$ 2,340,000$ 24,038,334$

General

J2 35 UW Water Research Program TBD TBD

Subtotal -$ 24,038,334$

Total For All Projects 30,217,350$ 29,862,660$

2017 Session


Rehabilitation Program - WDA II



7,505,458$

Level III Projects

T2 1 Casper CY Booster Station Replacement 2017 4 852,910$ 852,910$

U2 2 Deaver ID Flume Replacement/Laterals 2017 4 91,000$ 91,000$ 100% Materials only

V2 3 Dry Creek ID Pipeline Replacement 2017 4 670,000$ 670,000$

W2 4 Eden Valley Irrigation District SCADA 2017 4 150,750$ -$ Irrigation metering

XYZ2 5 Goshen ID Rehabilitation 2017 4 214,000$ 214,000$ 100% Materials only

A3 6 Heart Mountain ID Rehabilitation 2017 4 410,000$ 410,000$ 100% Materials only

B3 7 Midvale Pilot 27.0 A Lateral 2017 4 355,000$ 355,000$ 100% Materials only, Priority #1

C3 8 Midvale Sand Butte G Lateral 2017 4 300,000$ -$ 100% Materials only, Priority #2

D3 9 Shoshone ID Rehabilitation 2017 4 234,000$ 234,000$ 100% Materials only

E3 10 Sidon ID Rehabilitation 2017 4 483,000$ 483,000$

F3 11 Thermopolis Pipeline Replacement 2017 4 1,661,600$ 1,199,300$

Subtotal 5,422,260$ 4,509,210$ 2,996,248$

Level III Projects - Amendments

G3 12 Dull Knife Reservoir Spillway Rehabilitation 3 252,000$ 252,000$

H3 13 LeClair Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2016 4 1,189,400$ 770,910$

I3 14 Small Water Projects - Rehabilitation -$ -$

J3 15 Sponsor's Contingency Fund - Rehabilitation -$ -$ 8 yr time extension

Subtotal 1,441,400$ 1,022,910$ 1,973,338$

Level II Projects

K3 16 Cody Canal Laterals 4 180,000$ 180,000$

L3 17 Kirby Ditch Rehabilitation 4 100,000$ 100,000$

M3 18 Wheatland ID Tunnel Dam Rehabilitation 3 150,000$ 150,000$ Subtotal 430,000$ 430,000$ 1,543,338$

Level I Projects

Mc3 19 Hanover ID Master Plan, Phase II 4 120,000$ 120,000$

N3 20 LaPrele Irrigation District Master Plan 4 190,000$ 190,000$

Subtotal 310,000$ 310,000$ 1,233,338$

Total For All Projects 7,603,660$ $6,272,120

2017 Session


Dams and Reservoirs Program - WDA III



157,982,248$

Level III Projects

K2 1 Big Sandy Reservoir Enlargement 8,400,000$ 8,400,000$

L2 2 Middle Piney Reservoir 12,168,000$ 12,168,000$

M2 3 Alkali Creek Reservoir 35,000,000$ 35,000,000$

Mc2 4 Leavitt Reservoir Expansion 41,000,000$ 41,000,000$

Subtotal 96,568,000$ 96,568,000$ 61,414,248$

Level II Projects

N2 5 Big Wind River Storage Study, Phase II 475,000$ 475,000$

O2 6 Greybull Valley ID Storage Enlargement, Phase II 500,000$ 500,000$

P2 7 Little Wind River Storage Study, Phase II 475,000$ 475,000$

Q2 8 New Fork Lake Dam Enlargement, Phase II 450,000$ 450,000$

R2 9 Stateline Dam Enlargement, Phase II 300,000$ -$

S2 10 West Fork Reservoir, Phase III 6,220,000$ 6,220,000$

Subtotal 8,420,000$ 8,120,000$ 53,294,248$

Total for All Projects 104,988,000$ 104,688,000$

Wyoming Water Development Commission/Select Water Committee Workshop Minutes

August 24, 2016 Page 1

Wyoming Water Development Commission/Select Water Committee

Joint Workshop

Platte Valley Community Center, 210 W. Elm Ave., Saratoga, WY

August 24, 2016

Workshop was called to order at 1:35 pm.

1. Roll Call

Commission attendance:

Sheridan Little, Chairman

Nick Bettas, Vice-Chair

Todd Werbelow, Secretary

Jeanette Sekan

Karen Budd-Falen

Floyd Canfield

Rod Wagner

David Evans

Clinton Glick

Bill Resor – absent

Select Water Committee attendance:

Senator Gerald Geis

Senator Stan Cooper

Senator Dockstader

Senator Meier

Representative Robert McKim

Representative Stan Blake

Representative John Eklund

Representative Hans Hunt

Representative Jerry Paxton

2. Audience Introduction

Joe Glode, Upper North Platte Water User’s Association, addressed the

Commission and Select Water Committee, thanking them for being in Saratoga

and for discussing subjects of local interest.

3. West Fork Reservoir Update – Jason Mead

Jason Mead gave an update on the progress of the West Fork Reservoir project.

Discussion followed regarding timelines, financials and impacts.



4. Glendo Reservoir Update – Harry LaBonde

Director LaBonde presented the teacup diagram outlining storage and use

designations in Glendo Reservoir. He outlined the Governor’s Water Strategy #5,

the Glendo Reservoir Full Utilization project. Discussion followed regarding

whether Wyoming would be willing to modify the 2001 Modified Decree

procedures on how an allocation year on the North Platte River is determined.

Director LaBonde indicated the Glendo utilization project does not impact

modified decree requirements and therefore does not warrant a modification of

allocation year procedures.

5. Upper North Platte Watershed Study Presentation – Anderson Consulting

Engineers

Jay Shug of Anderson Consulting Engineers presented the findings of the Upper

North Platte Watershed Study. Forty-six projects were identified in the study with

an estimated total cost of 2 million dollars. Discussion followed regarding

precipitation and annual yield in the watershed, stock pond inventory and stream

gage use. The report is available to the public:

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte-

River_Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html

6. Protecting Aquatic Life from Effects of Hydrologic Alteration – EPA/USGS

Technical Report – Harry LaBonde

Director LaBonde and Kevin Frederick, DEQ, presented information regarding

the report. The Commission and SWC collectively agreed this could potentially

have negative impacts on the State of Wyoming. Written comments were

submitted by Governor Matt Mead, Director LaBonde, the State Engineer, and

DEQ. All of these comments requested the EPA withdraw the report.

7. Fontenelle Pipeline Presentation – Chace Tavelli

Project Manager Chace Tavelli presented the findings of an in-house study

regarding the feasibility of pursuing a water transmission pipeline from Fontenelle

Reservoir to various irrigable lands. The study determined the pipeline is not

feasible and the main transmission pipeline would cost in excess of $200 million

dollars. This estimated cost does not include lateral pipelines to distribute water

to irrigated parcels. Hydropower was not a feasible aspect to pursue due to flow

issues. Discussion followed. Bill Talliaferro was in attendance to ask questions as

he was one of the initially interested parties.

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte-River_Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte-River_Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html



8. Overview of Cheyenne Water Supply System - BOPU

Casey Whitman of the Cheyenne Board of Public Utilities presented an overview

of the Cheyenne municipal water system. This was in preparation of the tour on

Thursday, August 25, 2016.

9. Adjournment

The workshop adjourned at 5:34 pm

Respectfully,


Wyoming Water Development Commission/Select Water Committee Joint Meeting Minutes August 26, 2016 Page 1

Wyoming Water Development Commission & Select Water Committee

Joint Meeting

Platte Valley Community Center, 210 W. Elm Ave., Saratoga, Wyoming

August 26, 2016

1. Chairman Sheridan Little called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m

2. Secretary Todd Werbelow called the roll of commissioners:

Commission Attendance:

Sheridan Little, Chairman

Nick Bettas, Vice-Chairman


Karen Budd-Falen

Floyd Canfield

Jeanette Sekan

Clinton Glick

Rodney Wagner

David Evans

Bill Resor – Absent

Quorum present

Advisors in Attendance:

Greg Kerr, University of Wyoming, Office of Water Programs

Abigail Boudewyns, Assistant Attorney General

Select Water Committee Attendance:

Senator Gerald Geis, Chairman

Senator Stan Cooper

Senator Dan Dockstader

Senator John Hastert

Senator Curt Meier






3. Audience Introductions


4. Approval of Agenda

Commissioner Budd-Falen requested the addition of discussion regarding changes

to small district designation by the Legislature as well as information regarding the

Colorado Cutthroat lawsuit. Assistant Attorney General Abigail Boudewyns indicated

Special Meeting rules do not allow agenda modifications. Items may be discussed,

but not added to the official agenda.

Director LaBonde requested the Commission allow for Item #18, SWC consideration

of proposed legislation allowing for the transfer of excess funds from the Pathfinder

Modification Account and the Glendo Reservoir Account, to be moved ahead in the

agenda after Item #6.

Karen Budd-Falen made a motion to approve the agenda as revised, Floyd Canfield

seconded, the motion carried unanimously.

5. Approval of Minutes

June 1, 2016 – Workshop minutes: David Evans made a motion to approve,

seconded by Rod Wagner; the motion carried unanimously.

June 1, 2016 – Executive Session minutes: David Evans made a motion to approve,

seconded by Rod Wagner; the motion carried unanimously.

June 2, 2016 – Meeting minutes: David Evans made a motion to approve, seconded

by Rod Wagner; the motion carried unanimously.

The Select Water Committee took similar action on the June 2, 2016 minutes of the

Select Water Committee.

6. Request for Planning Contract Approval

South Worland Water Users – Sharon Smith and Peggy Truman spoke on behalf

of the South Worland Water Users. They explained to the Commission where in

the process of district formation they were and what they intend to do, albeit all

things take a tremendous amount of time when dealing with government entities

and attorneys. South Worland Water Users intend to become a district at some

point in 2017.

Todd Werbelow made a motion to approve the Planning Contract for South

Worland Water Users with James Gores and Associates in the amount of

$87,684.00. Floyd Canfield seconded the motion; the motion carried 7-2 with

Jeanette Sekan and Nick Bettas opposed, Bill Resor absent.

The Select Water Committee took similar action, approving the Planning Contract

for South Worland Water Users with James Gores and Associates unanimously.


Shell Water Users – Patty Tyrrell and Everett Dunklee spoke on behalf of the

Shell Water Users. They expressed their disappointment in the Commission’s

decision to table their project initially, but were moving forward with district

formation. The have 36 tap owners and 34 signatures.

Todd Werbelow made a motion to approve the Planning Contract for Shell Water

Users with Black Willow Oars in the amount of $74,700.00. David Evans

seconded the motion; the motion carried 5-4 with Nick Bettas, Rod Wagner,

Jeanette Sekan and Karen Budd-Falen opposed, Bill Resor absent.

The Select Water Committee took a similar action to approve the Shell Water Users

Planning Contract.

7. Item #18 – Select Water Committee – Consideration of proposed legislation

allowing for the transfer of excess funds from the Pathfinder Modification Account

and the Glendo Reservoir Account

A working draft of the proposed legislation was presented to the Select Water

Committee. Senator Stan Cooper made a motion to approve the proposed

legislation, Senator Dan Dockstader seconded the motion. The motion carried

unanimously.

Director LaBonde proposed handling agenda items #14 Consideration of MOA

between Scottsbluff, NE and WWDC, #15 Planning Contract – Platte Alliance Water

Supply (PAWS), Level II Study and #16 Leavitt Reservoir Expansion Project – Third

Party NEPA Contractor Services Contract Consideration while members of Select

Water Committee were still in attendance as each item will require their approval.

8. Item #14 – Consideration of MOA between Scottsbluff, NE and WWDC

A revised MOA between Scottsbluff, NE and WWDC was presented to the

Commission and Select Water Committee. The revised MOA includes more

opportunity for cooperation between entities. Director LaBonde recommended

approval of the revised MOA. Todd Werbelow made a motion to approve the MOA

between Scottsbluff NE, and WWDC. Rod Wagner seconded the motion, the motion

carried unanimously.

The Select Water Committee took similar action and approved the revised MOA

between Scottsbluff, NE and WWDC.

9. Item #15 Planning Contract – Platte Alliance Water Supply (PAWS), Level II

Study

Todd Werbelow made a motion to approve the Planning Contract for the Platte

Alliance Water Supply, Level II Study with M.C. Schaff and Associates, Inc in the


amount of $390,000.00. Jeanette Sekan seconded the motion, the motion carried

unanimously.

The Select Water Committee took similar action and approved the Planning Contract

for the PAWS project.

10. Item #16 – Leavitt Reservoir Expansion Project – Third Party NEPA Contractor

Services Contract Consideration

Jason Mead outlined the Leavitt Reservoir Expansion Project – Third Party NEPA

Contractor Services Contract. The Commission had several questions with regards

to the BLM, time lines, and costs. Todd Werbelow made a motion to approve the

Contract with AECOM Technical Services, Inc, in the amount of $1,222,193.00. Nick

Bettas seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.

The Select Water Committee took similar action and approved the Leavitt Reservoir

Expansion Project – Third Party NEPA Contractor Services Contract.

After a brief recess the Commission and Select Water Committee reconvened, at

which time two items of proposed legislation were distributed by Senator Meier and

will be considered during the Joint Ag meeting on September 12-13, 2016 in Fort

Washakie.

Return to the regular order of the agenda:

11. Item #7 – Closeout of Planning Projects

Buffalo Master Plan, Level I – Keith Clarey, Project Manager provided a brief

summary of the project findings. David Evans moved the acceptance of the

Buffalo Master Plan, Level I Study project report as being complete and further,

the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project:

That the Commission recommends proceeding to the next Level of project

development for the remaining eligible projects upon the submittal of an

appropriate funding application by the sponsor. Rod Wagner seconded the

motion. Discussion followed. The motion carried unanimously.

Medicine Bow River Watershed Study – Peter Gill, Project Manager provided a

brief summary of the project findings. Todd Werbelow moved the acceptance of

the Medicine Bow River Watershed Study Level I project report as complete and

further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project:


development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the

sponsor. Rod Wagner seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.


Meeteetse Master Plan, Level I – Keith Clarey, Project Manager provided a brief

summary of the project findings. Rod Wagner moved the acceptance of the

Meeteetse Master Plan, Level I Study project report as being complete and



development for the remaining eligible projects upon the submittal of an

appropriate funding application by the sponsor. Todd Werbelow seconded the

motion, the motion carried unanimously.

Midvale Irrigation Hydropower Study, Level II – Chace Tavelli, Project Manager

provided a brief summary of the project findings. Rod Wagner moved

acceptance of the Midvale Irrigation District Hydropower Study Level II project

report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings

relative to this project:

1. That the Commission recommend: Terminating further consideration of

the proposed project.

2. Based on the findings in the final report, the project is determined to be in

the public interest.

3. The project functions and services can realistically be provided by any

person, association or corporation engaged in private enterprise. There

are private entities that help districts build hydropower facilities and enter

into agreements with the districts that involve ownership, operations and

profit sharing.

Todd Werbelow seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.

Moorcroft Master Plan, Level I – Keith Clarey, Project Manager provided a brief

summary of the project findings. David Evans moved the acceptance of the

Medicine Bow River Watershed Study Level I project report as complete and



development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the

sponsor. Floyd Canfield seconded the motion, the motion carried

unanimously.

Piney Cruse Diversion Study, Level II – Barry Lawrence, filling in for Jodie

Pavlica – Project Manager, provided a brief summary of the project findings.

Karen Budd-Falen moved the acceptance of the Piney Cruse Diversion, Level II

Study project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the

following findings relative to this project


1. That the Commission recommend: Proceeding to Level III of project

development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by

the sponsor and proof the Board of Control granted the petition to change

the Point of Diversion.



3. The project functions and services cannot realistically be provided by any

person, association or corporation engaged in private enterprise.

Jeanette Sekan seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.

Sundance Feasibility Study, Level II – Keith Clarey – Project Manager provided

a brief summary of the project findings. Floyd Canfield moved acceptance of the

Sundance Feasibility Study, Level II project report as being complete and


1. That the Commission recommend proceeding to Level III of project

development for the remaining eligible proposed construction projects

upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor



3. The project functions and services cannot realistically be provided by any


Rod Wagner seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.

Weather Modification Feasibility Wyoming Range, Level II, Phase II – Jeni

Cederle – Project Manager provided a brief summary of the project findings and

the Office recommends project close out without further consideration.

Todd Werbelow moved the acceptance of the Weather Modification

Feasibility – Wyoming Range, Level II, Phase II, Study project report as being

complete, and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this

project:

1. That the Commission recommend terminating further consideration of the

proposed project.



3. The project functions and services can realistically be provided by any


Rod Wagner seconded the motion. Discussion followed. The motion carried

unanimously.


12. Item #8 – Update of Level III Construction Projects: Bryan Clerkin provided

Project Updates for the following Level III projects:

Eden Valley Rehabilitation 2011

Austin Wall Canal Rehabilitation

Burns Well Connection

Casper Alcova Underdraing 2016

Casper Poplar Transmission Pipeline

Casper Raw Water Supply II

Fayette Irrigation Rehabilitation

Gillette Madison Pipe Joint Bonding

Kemmerer-Diamondville Water System

LaBarge Water Supply

Lakeview Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2014

Little Snake Rehabilitation 2011

Midvale Sand Butte 2 Lateral

Riverton Valley Rehabilitation 2014

Sidon Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2014


Sundance PRV Improvement 2016

Sundance Transmission Pipeline 2016

Wheatland Rehabilitation 2011

Willwood Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2016

The information above was presented for information only, no action by either the WWDC

nor the SWC was required.

13. Item #9 – Consideration of Consultant Evaluation Forms

Karen Budd-Falen made a motion to table the item until a later date at which time

several other items might be handled. Jeanette Sekan seconded the motion. The

motion carried unanimously to table item #9 – Consideration of Consultant

Evaluation Forms. Discussion followed. WYDOT has used a similar form with

success for approximately 10 years. As to whether or not the consultant would be

seeing the form and evaluation, yes, the consultants will be able to review the

evaluations. Regarding the possibility of a poor evaluation, what would be the

consequences and ramifications, possibility of a backlash? The Commission

expressed their desire to bring new consultants into the process.

14. Item #10 – Consideration of Agency Process Descriptions –

The Commission briefly discussed a few of the suggested changes in the Agency

Process Descriptions. Floyd Canfield made a motion to table the item until a later

date at which time they could discuss and resolve multiple issues. Nick Bettas


seconded the motion. The motion to table the Consideration of Agency Process

Descriptions carried unanimously.

15. Item #11 – Consideration of new agency policies regarding Agency Process

Descriptions

The Commission discussed handling this item at a potential October meeting to

finalize several issues. Jeanette Sekan made a motion to table the Consideration of

new agency policies regarding Agency Process Descriptions. Karen Budd-Falen

seconded the motion, the motion carried unanimously.

16. Item #12 – Consideration of WWDC Rules Revisions

Abigail Boudewyns provided Article 16, Sections 6 and 10 of the Wyoming

Constitution for further clarification.

Commissioner Jeanette Sekan exited the meeting at 2:28 pm.

The Commission discussed tabling this item until a later time when several items can

be discussed and resolved at the same time. Floyd Canfield made a motion to table

the Consideration of WWDC Rules Revisions. Rod Wagner seconded the motion,

the motion carried unanimously.

17. Item #13 – Consideration of Project Priorities

Director LaBonde informed the Commission the Office was in the process of

reviewing new applications. He asked if the Commission would like to incorporate

the new priorities or use the existing priorities for this current round of applications.

The Commission suggested using the existing since the new priorities were not yet

finalized. David Evans made a motion to table the Consideration of Project Priorities

until a later date. Floyd Canfield seconded the motion. The motion carried

unanimously.

(Items 14-16, and 18 were handled earlier in the meeting)

18. Item #17 – New Applications and Commissioner Assignments

Barry Lawrence distributed a list of the new project applications and Commissioner

assignments.

19. Item #19 Discussion:

Financial Projection of Funds

Director LaBonde presented Water Development Office financial projections of

each account. Nick Bettas questioned the audit committee suggestion regarding

changing our accounting methods, Director LaBonde indicated the audit


committee initially didn’t understand our methods, but upon further explanation,

now understand.

Senator Gerry Geis stressed the importance of designating funds for dams and

reservoir development.

Live Streaming of Commission Meetings

Director LaBonde informed the Commission and Select Water of the requests the

agency has received to stream the meetings. He presented a couple of options.

David Evans made a motion to stream audio only. Karen Budd-Falen seconded

the motion, the motion carried unanimously. November 2016 will be the first

meeting to be streamed publicly.

Commissioner Nick Bettas left the meeting at 4:04 pm.

Shoshone River Instream Flow RFP

Director LaBonde inquired as to whether there was Commission interest in sitting

in on the consultant interviews. Director LaBonde explained the funding is from a

different series source than our normal projects. Rod Wagner made a motion to

approve the Shoshone River Instream Flow RFP and for two WWD

Commissioners be involved. David Evans seconded the motion. Karen Budd-

Falen amended the motion to designate Floyd Canfield and Sheridan Little to sit

on the project committee through the consultant selection projects. Todd

Werbelow seconded the amendment. The amendment passed unanimously. The

motion, as amended, carried unanimously.

Rejection of the Medicine Bow – Sierra Madre Weather Modification Special Use

Application by the Forest Service.

Director LaBonde indicated there may be other options to pursue including;

aircraft operation, network of generators on State and/or private ground, or

resubmitting an application to the Forest Service for a period of time less than 30

years.

Senator Curt Meier suggested pursuing the option of combined State and private

land based generators.

The Commission suggested and requested an update from Professor Brent Ewers

on his “Bark Beetle Infestation and Impacts on Forest Water Yield” project.

Director LaBonde will facilitate a presentation at a future meeting.


20. Future Meeting Schedule

The Commission decided on a special meeting on October 24, 2016 at 8:00am in

Casper. Venue TBD

Next 2016 meeting is in Casper, WY, November 9-11, 2016 at the Ramkota in

Casper.

The 2016-7 WWDC/SWC Calendar of meetings was presented.

21. Adjournment – Floyd Canfield made a motion to adjourn at 4:35 p.m., seconded by

David Evans, the motion carried unanimously.

Respectfully Submitted,


The Committee Meeting Summary of Proceedings (meeting minutes) is prepared by the Legislative Service Office

(LSO) and is the official record of the proceedings of a legislative committee meeting. This document does not

represent a transcript of the meeting; it is a digest of the meeting and provides a record of official actions taken by

the Committee. All meeting materials and handouts provided to the Committee by the Legislative Service Office,

public officials, lobbyists, and the public are on file at the Legislative Service Office and are part of the official

record of the meeting. An index of these materials is provided at the end of this document and these materials are

on file at the Legislative Service Office. For more information or to review meeting materials, please contact the

Legislative Service Office at (307) 777-7881 or by e-mail at [email protected]. The Summary of Proceedings for each

legislative committee meeting can be found on the Wyoming Legislature’s website at www.wyoleg.gov.

D r a f t O n l y A p p r o v a l P e n d i n g

SUMMARY of PROCEEDINGS

SELECT WATER COMMITTEE

COMMITTEE MEETING INFORM ATION

August 24-26

Community Center

Saratoga, Wyoming

COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT


Senator Stan Cooper

Senator Dan Dockstader

Senator John Hastert

Senator Curt Meier






COMMITTEE MEMBERS NOT PRESENT

Senator Ogden Driskill

Representative David Northrup

LEGISLATIVE SERVICE OFFICE STAFF

Joshua Anderson, Staff Attorney

OTHERS PRESENT AT MEETING

Harry LaBonde, Director, Wyoming Water Development Office

Please refer to Appendix 1 to review the Committee Sign-in Sheet

for a list of other individuals who attended the meeting.

http://legisweb.state.wy.us/InterimCommittee/2016/SWC-0824APPENDIX1.pdf

OF 6

SELECT WATER COMMITTEE Summary of Proceedings

WYOMING LEGISLATIVE SERVICE OFFICE • 213 State Capitol • Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 TELEPHONE (307) 777-7881 • FAX 307-777-5466 • E-MAIL [email protected] • WEB SITE www.wyoleg.gov

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Select Water Committee met jointly with the Water Development Commission in Saratoga. On

Wednesday August 24, the Committee attended the workshop meeting of the Water Development

Commission. On Thursday August 25 the Committee toured various water projects in the area

surrounding Saratoga. On Friday August 26 the Committee held a formal meeting. The Committee voted

to approve projects as approved by the Commission including planning projects for South Worland Water

Users and Shell Water Users, the MOA and planning contract for the Platte Alliance Water Supply and

the Leavitt Reservoir expansion project. The Committee voted to sponsor bill draft 17LSO-0058 related

to the transfer of water funds from reservoir accounts to Water Accounts I and II.

CALL TO ORDER (AUGUST 26, 2016)

Chairman Geis called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. The following sections summarize the Committee

proceedings by topic. Please refer to Appendix 2 to review the Committee Meeting Agenda.

APPROVAL OF M INUTES

Minutes from the June 2, 2016 Committee meeting were approved with no changes.

REQUEST FOR PLANNING CONTRACT APPROVAL

Mr. LaBonde of the Water Development Office provided the Committee with a meeting notebook. .

Appendix 3. He noted that the Commission had declined to approve two planning contracts for Level I

studies because the requestors had not formed public entities. See tabs E and F of the meeting notebook in

Appendix 3. The groups that had originally requested the projects had contacted the Office and asked to

be on the agenda for the August meeting.

Ms. Sharon Smith of the South Worland Water Users made a presentation to the Commission and the

Committee. She noted that they were in the process of becoming a water district but that they need more

information which could be generated through the Level I study. They have continued to go forward with

district formation including hiring a lawyer and surveyor. In response to a question, Ms. Smith noted that

it was their intention to form a district using the information gained through the Level I study and the

group was surprised when they learned they were expected to form a water district prior to the Level I

study.

After additional discussion the Commission voted to approve the contract for the Level I study for the

South Worland Water Users. Representative Blake moved that the Committee approve the contract as

approved by the Commission. The motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.

Ms. Patty Tyrell of the Shell Water Users said that they are moving forward towards the formation of a

water district and had received a letter of support from the town of Greybull. Mr. Everett Dunkle of the

Shell Water Users said that they are hoping to form a water district within a year.

After additional discussion the Commission voted to approve the contract for the Level I study for the

Shell water users. Representative Blake moved that the Committee approve the contract as approved by

the Commission. The motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.

17LSO-0058 – TRANSFER OF WATER FUNDS

Mr. LaBonde described the bill draft 17LSO-0058 - Transfer of water funds. Appendix 4. He noted that

the bill draft would authorize the transfer of excess funds in the accounts for various reservoirs to Water




OF 6



Account 1. Excess funds from the Pathfinder modification account would be authorized for transfer to

Water Account 2 because the original funding for Pathfinder Reservoir was from that account.

Senator Cooper moved that the Committee sponsor the bill draft and the motion was seconded. The

motion passed with a roll call vote of ten ayes and two excused. Appendix 5.

CONSIDERATION OF MOA BETWEEN SCOTTSBLUFF , NE AND WWDC

Mr. LaBonde described tab Mc of the meeting notebook in Appendix 3 related to a Memorandum of

Agreement (MOA) between the City of Scottsbluff, Nebraska and the Water Development Office. He

noted that an agreement had been reached which authorized the Water Development Office to conduct the

study but gives Scottsbluff the ability to have input. The Commission voted to approve the agreement.

Representative Eklund moved that the Committee approve the revised MOA. The motion was seconded

and passed by voice vote.

PLANNING CONTRACT – PLATTE ALLIANCE WATER SUPPLY

Mr. LaBonde described tab N of Appendix 3 representing a planning contract for the Platte Alliance

water supply. He noted that the total cost of the planning contract is $390,000.00 with half of that amount

paid by the City of Scottsbluff, Nebraska and half paid by the Water Development Office. The

Commission voted to approve the contract.

Representative McKim moved that the Committee approve the contract. The motion was seconded and

passed by voice vote.

LEAVITT RESERVOIR EXPANSION PROJECT

Mr. Jason Mead of the Water Development Office explained tab O of Appendix 3 related to a contract for

hiring third party NEPA contractor services for the the Leavitt Reservoir Expansion project. He said that

the Office had selected a firm from eight total applicants. The final contract amount is less than the

original estimate. In response to a question, Mr. Mead noted that if the project was required to wait for the

Bureau of Land Management to complete the NEPA process it would take significantly longer.

After additional discussion the Commission voted to approve the contract. Representative Hunt moved

that the Committee approve the contract. The motion was seconded and passed by voice vote.

Senator Meier provided a handout of two bills related to Water Development, 17LSO-0047 – Water

commission duties and 17LSO-0057 – Select water committee review of projects. Appendix 6. Senator

Meier explained the bills. After discussion, Chairman Geis stated that those bills would be considered at

the September Joint Agriculture Committee meeting in Fort Washakie.

CLOSEOUT OF PLANNING PROJECTS

The Commission voted to approve the closeout of the following completed planning projects:

Buffalo Master Plan, Level I

Medicine Bow Watershed Study, Level I

Meeteetse Master Plan, Level I

Midvale Irrigation Hydropower Study, Level II

Moorcroft Master Plan, Level I

Piney Cruse Diversion Study, Level II

Sundance Feasibility Study, Level II



OF 6



Weather Modification Feasibility Wyoming Range, Level II, Phase II

UPDATE OF LEVEL II I CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Mr. Bryan Clerkin of the Water Development Office provided an update on the following Level III

construction projects which can be found in Tab H of the meeting materials:

Eden Valley Rehabilitation 2011

Austin Wall Canal Rehabilitation

Burns Well Connection

Casper Alcova Underdrain 2016

Casper Poplar Transmission Pipeline

Casper Raw Water Supply II

Fayette Irrigation Rehabilitation

Gillette Madison Pipe Joint Bonding

Kemmerer-Diamondville Water System

LaBarge Water Supply

Lakeview Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2014

Little Snake Rehabilitation 2011

Midvale Sand Butte 2 Lateral

Riverton Valley Rehabilitation 2014



Sundance PRV Improvements 2016

Sundance Transmission Pipeline 2016

Wheatland Rehabilitation 2011

Willwood Irrigation District Rehabilitation 2016

WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT PROCESS D ISCUSSION

The Commission considered several issues related to the operations of the Commission and the Water

Development Office. See Tabs I through M of the meeting materials. Appendix 3. After discussion, the

Commission determined to table those items for a final determination at a future meeting of the

Commission.

D ISCUSSION

Mr. LaBonde noted the Office is in the process of conducting a request for proposals to hire a consultant

to conduct a hydrologic analysis of the Shoshone River instream flow. The Commission voted to have

two members of the Commission participate in the selection of the consultant.

Mr. LaBonde noted that the special use permit necessary to operate the Medicine Bow – Sierra Madre

weather modification program was denied by the Forest Service. He said that they are still looking at

other options including limiting the program to state and private lands or using airplanes.

OF 6



MEETING ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, Chairman Geis adjourned the meeting at 4:45 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,


OF 6



Appendix Agenda Item Appendix Description Appendix Provider

1 Committee Sign-In Sheet Lists meeting attendees Legislative Service Office

2 Committee Meeting

Agenda

Provides an outline of the topics the

Committee planned to address at meeting

Legislative Service Office

3 Meeting materials Meeting materials notebook Water Development

Office

4 Transfer of water funds 17LSO-0058 0.2 – Transfer of water funds Legislative Service Office

5 Transfer of water funds Vote form for 17LSO-0058 0.2 Legislative Service Office

6 Proposed Select Water

Legislation

17LSO-0047 – Water Commission Duties

and 17LSO-0057 – Select water committee

review of projects

Legislative Service Office

Committee Meeting

Materials Index







The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Byron Master Plan

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: Town of Byron LOCATION: Byron, Wyoming PROGRAM: New Development PROJECT MGR: Dave Myer AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 168 2015 I $130,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant TREC, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296313 6-4-15 $128,990 $99,724.91 $29,265.09 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Town of Byron Master Plan project was completed to provide the Town with a plan for its existing water system as well as recommendations for improvement and associated financial scenarios to obtain funding for the recommendations included in the report. Specific actions in the project included the following:

Review of existing information and past studies for the Town, including a limited review of the Town’s open channel irrigation system;

Site survey of viewable water and irrigation system components; Development of wall maps and a GIS database to be utilized as needed by the Town; Creation of an existing and proposed recommendation hydraulic model using WaterGEMS; Review of water sources, including the Shoshone Municipal Pipeline; Review of water quality, water rights, and system operations; Projected population growth and projected water demand; Creation of recommendations from review of above information and desires of Town; Preparation of conceptual design cost estimates for each recommendation; Completion of funding scenarios, excluding WWDC funding options (no recommendations were

found to be WWDC eligible); and, Presentation of draft and final reports to the community.

At the time of the report completion, the Town had not determined to pursue funding which would require an environmental report, therefore, no environmental assessment was completed as part of this project.

FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT MEMO FOR LEVEL I AND II PLANNING PROJECTS WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT OFFICE

PLANNING DIVISION

1

PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Overall, the Town of Byron’s water system is in good condition and is operating well. Recent upgrades in meters and remote reading have increased efficiencies and allowed staff to focus on leak detection and maintenance activities. The report provided six recommendations; however, three of the six recommendations are provided as growth-oriented options and are not crucial to improving the water system. These recommendations include the following:

1. In-fill distribution piping – New piping located along several streets to accommodate growth in town where vacant lots exist that currently lack utility services.

2. Distribution Loop – Additional distribution piping located at the northwestern portion of town to provide for future expansion and offer hydraulic improvements to a dead end distribution line.

3. Replace distribution pipe under Main Street – Replace existing pipe during the planned WY DOQ highway repairs to economize on construction activities and reduce costs to the Town.

The other three recommendations were provided based on poor conditions observed during inventory of the Town’s existing infrastructure. These recommendations include the following:

1. Rehabilitate Fire Hydrants – Fourteen existing hydrants are partially buried and/or are labeled as “out of service”. These hydrants are recommended to be repaired in order they provide adequate and timely fire suppression services during times of emergency.

2. New Fire Hydrants – Four additional fire hydrants are recommended to be installed to effectively provide coverage based on International Fire Code recommendations.

3. Rehabilitate Isolation Valves – Numerous valves have been buried due to road construction activities and are no longer available for isolation purposes. Rehabilitation or replacement of the the buried valves will allow less service interruption to the Town during repair activities.

PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town 9-13-16 Byron Town Hall, 35 S. Pryor Street Byron, WY FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Byron/Byron-Master_Plan_Study-Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html

Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Byron/Byron-Master_Plan_Study-Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

WWDO RECOMMENDATION: The WWDO recommends to proceed to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Level I Byron Master Plan report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:

Proceeding to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor.

2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Byron/Byron-Master_Plan_Study-Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Byron/Byron-Master_Plan_Study-Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Byron/Byron-Master_Plan_Study-Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Cowley Master Plan

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: Town of Cowley LOCATION: Cowley, Wyoming PROGRAM: New Development PROJECT MGR: Dave Myer AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 168 2015 I $135,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Morrison-Maierle, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296363 6-12-15 $133,000 $133,000 $0 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this Level I study was to review Cowley’s water supply and storage, examine its future water needs, and develop a plan for providing water service to its existing and future customers. The study also provided an inventory and mapping of the town’s existing water system, a geographical information system (GIS), and a hydraulic model for future planning. This master plan covers the Town of Cowley (Water System WY5600206), the South End Water Users (Water System WY5600970), and the West End Water Users that is served by the Cowley Water System. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations for major infrastructure improvements were developed and prioritized within this master plan. A matrix was developed that evaluated these needed capital improvement projects (CIP) on a number of criteria to set relative priority. The matrix listed the various potential improvements and then prioritized them by five different categories: 1) Health, Safety & Security, 2) Regulatory, 3) Operational, 4) Financial/Budget Implications, and 5) Funding Eligible. Values were assigned to each of these categories according to engineering judgment and to quantify and prioritize the capital improvement projects. A summary of the recommended improvements are below: CIP - 1. Chlorination & Backflow on Taps BLM #1 through BLM #4: This project includes the

installation of a chlorination facility to disinfect the entire water supply and backflow prevention devices on several stock watering taps on the transmission main between the Madison #1 Well and town.


PLANNING DIVISION

1

CIP - 2. New 500,000-gallon Elevated Tank: This project includes the installation of a new 500,000-gallon elevated water storage tank with associated piping and removal of the existing 200,000-gallon tank.

CIP - 3. AC Main Replacement. This project includes replacing all of the remaining AC pipe (7,230 lf) in the distribution system.

CIP - 4. Transmission Line Replacement: This project includes the replacement of approximately 22,000 LF of 12-inch Perma-Strand transmission pipe with new 12-inch PVC pipe.

CIP - 5. Distribution System Replacements: This project includes the replacement undersized lines and to provide for looping. The assumption is that the Town will start a replacement program with approximately $200,000 allocated per year. Multiple years could be combined to maximize funding opportunities.

CIP - 6. New Water Well. This project includes the evaluation and completion of a second (redundant) water well.

Cost estimates have been developed for the prioritized capital improvement projects. A summary of the cost estimates associated with these improvements is shown on the following table:

CIP Project Title 2015 Total

Cost Estimate

1. Chlorination & Backflow: Taps BLM #1 through BLM #4 $ 185,000

2. New Elevated Tank: 500,000-gallon including line Replacement #1 $4,387,000

3. AC Main Replacements $1,491,000

4. Transmission Line Replacement: Replace 12-inch Perma-Strand section with PVC $3,050,000

5. Distribution Line Replacements (Total improvements through 2035) $3,997,000

6. New Water Well $5,450,000

In addition to the capital improvement project recommendations addressed above, several other recommendations are presented in detail in the report and are summarized below. 1. Well Flow Test and Corrosion Investigation – Section 12.2.5 recommends conducting a new flow test on the existing Madison #1 Well to determine the current flow rate, drawdown, and other relative well parameters. In order to do a well test, modifications will have to be made to the existing vault and piping. The condition of the well head, piping valves, and surface well casing should be evaluated at the time of the flow test. The original Madison #1 Well was drilled and completed in 1983. A flow test was completed in 1982, however there have been no additional flow tests since 1983. Table 12-7 within the final report summarizes the costs associated with the flow test. 2. Shoshone Municipal Pipeline Connection – Section 6.3 discusses the possibility of Cowley becoming a participating member of the Shoshone Municipal Pipeline (SMP) project and connecting to the pipeline as an alternate water source. The Wyoming Water Development Commission is a proponent of regional water systems and believes the connection is a candidate for an alternative water source. Cowley enjoys the water they obtain from their Madison No.1 Well and the low water rates they experience because they do not have to purchase, pump, or treat the water from the Madison No.1 Well.

2

There are several significant projects listed in Section 12.2 Capital Improvement Program (improvements numbered 3, 5, and several of the recommended pipe replacements listed for improvement number 4) that would not be required if Cowley connected directly to the Shoshone Municipal Pipeline. Therefore, a Level II study is needed to compare the cost of these improvements to the cost of the connection to the SMP. 3. Raw Water System Improvements – Section 3.7 discusses pressure and flow issues for raw water users in the southern portion of the in-town raw water system. If the town pursues funding to address the pressure and flow issues, a Level II study is recommended to determine the causes of the pressure and flow issue and evaluate appropriate alternatives. This recommended Level II Study pertains to the raw water system and not the potable water system. Other miscellaneous recommendations are as follows: 1. Cowley Deaver Interconnect Agreement: The Towns of Deaver and Cowley need to develop an agreement that establishes procedures and responsibilities for each in order to use the water service interconnect. 2. The Cowley Master Plan involved the development of a GIS system and hydraulic model of the Cowley water system. As with the master plan, the GIS system and the hydraulic model should be used and kept up to date. This task will require allocation of staff time, equipment, and budget, or hiring a consultant. 3. Operations: There are numerous recommendations in Chapter 9 related to the operations and maintenance. The Town has been keeping up with the general operational and maintenance requirements. The recommendations in Chapter 9 should be reviewed regularly. 4. Utility Billing System: Cowley should upgrade its utility billing software and reorganize its meter records to make it is easier to track water usage, leaks, and water system information. 5. Record Drawings: Cowley does not have a complete set of record drawings for its water system. Cowley should collect and organize all available records, drawings, water quality test results, reports, and other pertinent information. Copies should be kept in multiple locations for backup and scanned electronically. 6. Water Quality: The records received and reviewed in Chapter 7 were limited. In order to develop an adequate history of water quality from the Madison No.1 Well it is recommended that in addition to EPA required testing, Cowley budget for and annually obtain water quality tests for the constituents listed in Table 7-4 within the final report. The results of the annual water quality should be compared to previous results to verify the well water quality is being maintained. 7. Hydropower: The hydropower evaluation resulted in a “not feasible” recommendation. With an initial investment of $293,500 (without upgrading the transmission line), the net present worth is a negative $277,469. For Cowley to realize any return, the hydropower project would have to be funded 100 percent by grants. PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town 9-13-16 Cowley Town Hall, 20 Division Street Cowley, WY

3

FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: The WWDO recommends to proceed to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Level I Cowley Master Plan report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:


4

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Cowley/Town_of_Cowley-Master_Plan_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Deaver Irrigation District Master Plan Update

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: Deaver Irrigation District LOCATION: Park and Bighorn Counties PROGRAM: Rehabilitation PROJECT MGR: Jodie Pavlica AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 168 2015 II 162,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Sage Civil Engineering Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296306 6-10-15 $155,000 $155,000 $0 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 2016 Deaver Irrigation District Master Plan provided a prioritized list of structures that were in need of rehabilitation or replacement, cost estimates for the District to use going forward, an updated GIS to reflect the changes to the system, recommendations of areas where open ditches should be put in pipe, and an analysis of the potential for SCADA within their system. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS:

Project Cost1 1 Lateral D23 Flume Replacement $89,318.15 2 Marchant Flume Replacement $437,026.80 3 Measurement Related Projects $294,369.45 4 Frannie Chute 1 Replacement $539,108.23 5 Deaver Chute 2 Replacement $795,886.53 6 Deaver Chute 1 Replacement $822,512.56 7 Lateral 209F $1,243,698.75 8 Lateral D56-87-1,2 $556,466.95 9 Lateral D44-10,9 $220,756.65

10 Lateral 129F, F-7 $803,602.70 11 Lateral 94F $599,765.75 12 Lateral 158F $684,377.80


PLANNING DIVISION

1

Project (continued) Cost1 13 Lateral 176F $955,461.60 14 Lateral D56-25 $326,800.60 15 Lateral D56-25-6 $179,720.85 16 Lateral D52 $848,980.95 17 Lateral D52-11 $370,446.35 18 Lateral D56 $59,402.70

1Project Cost represents the total project cost including installation, materials, engineering, permitting, mitigation, and contingency. The Sponsor may choose to apply for a materials only grant, the costs of which are not separately broken out in this table. This 2016 Deaver Irrigation District Master Plan project was completed on time, with the District affirming their decision to move forward in the program with the D23 Flume and the D44 – 9&10 projects. PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town 10-3-16 Deaver Irrigation District Office, 13 1st Ave Deaver, Wyoming FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

WWDO RECOMMENDATION: The WWDO recommends that the project be advanced to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Deaver Irrigation District Master Plan Update Level I project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:


2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Deaver/Deaver_Irrigation_District-Master_Plan_Update_Level_I_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Dry Creek Irrigation District Master Plan

LEVEL: II SPONSOR: Dry Creek Irrigation District LOCATION: Afton, Wyoming (Lincoln County) PROGRAM: Rehabilitation PROJECT MGR: Peter Gill AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level II 168 2015 II $150,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Forsgren Associates, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296316 6-11-15 $143,400 $129,358.52 $ 14,041.48 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Dry Creek Irrigation System which services approximately 3,600 acres and 230 water users is in need of pipeline replacement. The system was installed in the 1970s and has functioned well but is now showing indications of failure in steel lines. The Level II Study provides an inventory and assessment of the system, investigation of conveyance losses, a prioritization of pipe sections to be replaced. Similarly, the study analyzed the diversion structure and other appurtenances for similar upgrades, evaluated hydropower options, produced a GIS system to assist in the management of the system, and recommended changes to the rate assessment needed to fund construction. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Soil characterization, video inspection, and leak testing completed as part of the Master Planning effort suggests all of the 19 miles of steel lines are experiencing significant corrosion. It is recommended that all steel lines be replaced. Because this would be too expensive for the District to replace all at once ($14M to replace all the lines), the master plan includes prioritization of pipe segments so that the District could accomplish a phased replacement based on what they can afford with their new rate assessment. The plan lays out construction projects in eight project phases, packaged into approximately $1,000,000 projects, to be paid off over the next 21 years. The initial eight phases of anticipated construction are laid out below. Subsequent phases included in the plan are to be completed beyond the 20 year planning horizon. Stage 1 Completion Order

Stage 1 Phases Description Length Project Cost

1-2 LN-5b Junction with LN-5 to End at Salt River 5,455 $666,517 3-5 LN-4 West – Allred Road to End at Salt River 6,490 $854,444

6-8

LS-2 Junction of Main Transmission and North Header to South Extent of System 6,190 $1,382,931


PLANNING DIVISION

1

PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: Y Date Location City/Town 8-08-16 Lincoln County Planning and Engineering Office Afton, WY 61 E. 5th Avenue FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report:

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: The Office recommends advancing to Level III status based on the projects, system inventory, and new rate assessment included in the Level II Study. A hearing was held on August 8, 2016 to discuss the results of the report, an increased rate payer assessment, and for private enterprise to express interest in providing the functions and services of the District. The hearing was well attended, and many voiced interest in rehabilitating the system. A new rate assessment of $20/acre/year for parcels 15 acres and larger and $300/year for parcels smaller than 15 acres was passed at a subsequent District meeting (Sept. 14, 2016). No private enterprise came forward at the hearing, and further research by Forsgren Associates concludes that there are no private irrigation water providers in a position to operate the Dry Creek Irrigation District system. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Dry Creek Irrigation District Master Plan Level II project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project:

1. That the Commission recommend: Proceeding to Level III of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor. (See existing Level III application “Dry Creek ID Pipeline

Replacement 2017”)

2. Based on the findings in the final report, the project is determined to be in the public interest.

3. The project functions and services cannot realistically be provided by any person, association

or corporation engaged in private enterprise.

2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Dry_Creek/Dry_Creek_Irrigation_District-Infrastructure_Master_Plan_Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Heart Mountain Canal Rehabilitation

LEVEL: II SPONSOR: Heart Mountain Irrigation District LOCATION: Cody, Wyoming (Park County) PROGRAM: Rehabilitation PROJECT MGR: Dave Myer AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level II 168 2015 II $110,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Engineering Associates Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296303 6-9-15 $90,000.00 $89,896.75 $103.25 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Heart Mountain Irrigation District (Sponsor) requested a Level II site-specific study along a section of the Heart Mountain Main Canal, downstream of the Rattlesnake Tunnel outlet, to assess recent concrete canal liner failures, verify causes, and provide recommendations for canal rehabilitation or replacement. The existing concrete liner was originally constructed in 1938 and is now beyond its expected life expectancy. Numerous subsurface instabilities and problems with the liner have been occurring over the last couple of decades, and the District has worked hard to diligently prevent or repair these. However, in 2011, a major failure of the canal liner occurred causing an overtopping breach. The water flowed over the top of the liner and eroded the material behind it to a point that the liner collapsed. The District shut down the canal for days to repair the collapse, leaving over 30,000 acres without irrigation water. WWDC contracted with Engineering Associates in June, 2015 to complete this investigation of the canal. The scope of the study primarily included the following: 1. Evaluation of the canal by visual inspection, ground penetrating radar, and other non-destructive techniques; 2. Hydraulic analyses to examine canal geometry, capacities, and closed-conduit conveyance options; 3. Preparation of rehabilitation and/or improvement options, conceptual designs, and cost estimates. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: With the amount of cracking, poor subgrade, and given the age of existing liner, another major canal failure is imminent. Trying to “Band-Air” fix the existing liner will only postpone the inevitable replacement. Three general categories were identified to improve or replace the existing liner: 1. Liner Rehabilitation; 2. Liner Replacement; 3. Use of Closed Conduit. A total of twelve options were examined as tabulated below.


PLANNING DIVISION

1

The preferred recommendations are Option 7 – Box Culvert Replacement, or Option 3 – Entire Liner Replacement. If sufficient funding is available, the rebuilding of this canal section should be completed using Option 7. This would be the most prudent option with the longest life span and would minimize future maintenance. The estimated cost for Option 7 is $7,716,470. If total construction cost of this project is a concern due to funding availability, Option 3 should be utilized. The estimated cost for Option 3 is $2,001,875. PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: Y Date Location City/Town 9-14-16 Park County Library, 1500 Heart Mountain St. Cody, WY FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

WWDO RECOMMENDATION: In the 2013 Session, legislation was approved for completion of an irrigation system master plan for the District. The study was completed in May, 2015 and recommended further investigation of the Heart Mountain Main Canal and its occurring failures. In the 2015 Session, legislation was approved for completion of this Level II Study which examined the canal and provided recommendations for rehabilitation as addressed herein. Comments received during the public hearing (September 14, 2016) validated the need for the continuation to the next level of project development with respect to the public interest and ensuring delivery of irrigation water to the entire Heart Mountain Irrigation District that consists of over 30,000 acres. During the public hearing, no comments were received regarding whether the project functions and services can be provided by any person, associate, or corporation engaged in private enterprise. It is therefore the WWDO recommendation to proceed to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate Level III funding application by the sponsor with respect to one of the preferred replacement options as identified within this Level II study and as described above.

2017 PROJECT

Option Description COST TOTAL

1 HOLLOW PANEL REPLACEMENT 873,264.54$

2 HOLLOW PANEL REPLACEMENT AND POLYURETHANE LINER 1,588,187.27$

3 ENTIRE LINER REPLACEMENT 2,001,874.38$

4 ENTIRE LINER REPLACEMENT WITH POLYURETHANE COATING 2,651,804.14$

5 120" DUROMAXX PIPE REPLACEMENT 6,752,585.31$

6 120" RCP PIPE REPLACEMENT 7,563,336.56$

7 9-FT x 18-FT BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT 7,716,469.71$

8 PANEL REPLACEMENT - PROCUREMENT ONLY 251,767.26$

9 FULL LINER REPLACEMENT - PROCUREMENT ONLY 886,486.54$

10 120" DUROMAXX PIPE REPLACEMENT-PROCUREMENT ONLY 3,500,091.03$

11 RCP PIPE REPLACEMENT 4,062,038.21$

12 9-FT x 18-FT BOX CULVERT REPLACEMENT-PROCUREMENT ONLY 4,315,778.92$

2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Heart_Mountain/Heart_Mountain_Canal-Rehabilitation_Level_II_Study-Executive_Summary-2016.html

WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Heart Mountain Canal Rehabilitation Level II project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:

Proceeding to Level III of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor.




3

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: High Meadow Ranch

LEVEL: II SPONSOR: High Meadow Ranch Water District LOCATION: Sublette County, Wyoming PROGRAM: New Development PROJECT MGR: Kevin Boyce, P.G. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level II 168 2015 I $500,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Jorgensen Associates, P.C. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296310 6-11-15 $490,000 TBD* TBD 6-30-18 *Expenditures to date: $366,725.15; final invoice pending. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The High Meadow Ranch Water District is located eight miles southeast of Pinedale off of U.S. Highway 191 and the water system serves approximately 782 residents (274 taps). Their water is supplied from three wells with estimated depths in the range of 900 – 2,750 feet. The distribution system consists primarily of 4” diameter PVC pipe with an average age of 38 years. The Sponsor has struggled in recent years to maintain reliability within the water system and at times residents have had to haul water. The 2014 Level I Master Plan included a complete analysis of the system to identify deficiencies and the development of a long term system plan. Study components included additional source capacity, water storage, and a distribution system evaluation. The District applied for Level II funding as part of the 2015 New Development Program to drill a new well and explore other system component feasibility options as recommended by the master plan. A successful well was drilled and tested in the spring of 2016 as a means to solve the source-supply deficiency. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Priority Project Estimated Cost WWDC Eligible Non-Eligible 1 Connect New Well* $ 384,912.56 $ 384,912.56 2 Source Wells Back-up Power $ 68,900.95 $ 68,900.95 3 Connect N. & S. Systems $1,135,901.92 $1,135,901.92 4 Install Water Meters $1,218,302.56 $1,218,302.56 5 New Storage Tank $1,403,510.23 $1,403,510.23 6 Replace 4”lines w/6” lines $4,784,150.30 $4,784,150.30 * Purchase/Acquire Level II Well @ $56,179.26 (33% of Well Construction cost)


PLANNING DIVISION

1

PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: Y Date Location City/Town 9-15-16 Sublette Co. Weed & Pest, 12 S. Bench Rd. Pinedale, Wyoming FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: Advance to WWDC 2017 Level III In Re: W.S. §41-2-115

Public Hearing held September 15, 2016 Project functions and services cannot be provided by private enterprise High Meadow Ranch Water District is desirous and capable of constructing, operating and

maintaining the project The project is in the public interest All hearing comments recorded were in favor of the project

WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the High Meadow Ranch Level II project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:

Proceeding to Level III of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor.




2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/High_Meadow_Ranch/High_Meadow_Ranch-Level_II-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: LeClair Irrigation District Master Plan

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: LeClair Irrigation District LOCATION: Fremont County PROGRAM: Rehabilitation PROJECT MGR: Jodie Pavlica AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 168 2015 II $175,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant HDR Engineering, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296314 6-15-15 $172,960 $171,656.02 $1303.98 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Prior to the completion of the 2016 Master Plan the LeClair Irrigation District had never had a complete analysis of their system. The 2016 Master Plan provided the District with a prioritized list of items that needed replacement, a GIS system to better manage their infrastructure, management recommendations, and costs to complete the recommended alternatives. The study showed three sections of the canal with high amounts of seepage. These sections were the Cemetery, Dalley, and Haymaker sections, totaling 13,450 lineal feet of canal. With respect to the Cemetery section, the Mountain View Cemetery Board applied to the WWDC for a Level II study in 2014 to look at lining the section located at the beginning of the canal which runs past the cemetery and has been a problem for years. The WWDC decided at that time to include this seepage analysis in the LeClair Irrigation District Master Plan project, instead of conducting a separate study for the cemetery district. The Mountain View Cemetery District has been saving money to pay for their portion of the canal lining. The other two sections of canal, the Dalley and Haymaker sections, are at the lower end of the canal. Seepage through these sections have been a problem for years as well, but was recently exacerbated by some routine canal maintenance that removed the earthen seal on the bottom of the canal. Currently, seepage through these sections of canal has been shown to account for approximately 50% of the flow. This makes it very difficult to deliver water below this area.


PLANNING DIVISION

1

PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS:

Recommended Projects Total Cost

1. Dalley Section Lining $1,080,000 2. Haymaker Section Lining $ 414,000 3. Foxtail Section Lining $ 805,000 4. Cemetery Option B $ 673,000 5. Water Delivery Turnout

Replacement Program (10 ea.yr) $ 320,000 6. Check Structure Below 3A $ 252,000 7. Check Structure Below 5 $ 252,000 8. Check Structure Below 7 $ 252,000 9. Repair Flumes $ 38,000 10. Sand Gate Structure $ 753,000

PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town 9-27-16 LeClair District Office, 1418 Cowboy Lane Riverton, Wyoming FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report:

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Executive_Summary-2016.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: The WWDO recommends that the project be advanced to the next Level of project development upon the submittal of an appropriate funding application by the sponsor. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the LeClair Irrigation District Master Plan Level I project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:


2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Executive_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/LeClair/LeClair_Irrigation_District-Level_I_System_Master_Plan-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Opal Master Plan

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: Town of Opal LOCATION: Opal, Wyoming (Lincoln County) PROGRAM: New Development PROJECT MGR: Kevin Boyce, P.G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 168 2015 I $100,000 2018 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Forsgren Associates, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0296311 6-11-15 $ 75,555 $ 75,525.05 $ 29.95 6-30-17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Town’s submission of a 2015 application for a Level I Master Plan was to remain compliant with the grant funding received [January 2014] from the State Land and Investment Board. A condition for approval of the grant was for the Town to “…Engage the WWDO to perform a Level 1 Study of the Town’s water system.” The completion of a WWDC Level I Master Plan Study at this time meets that requirement and fulfills the SLIB director’s recommendation. The SLIB grant was to replace domestic point-of-use reverse osmosis treatment units that were mandated by the EPA in 2001 to remove fluoride from the Town’s source-wells supply. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The basis of the water system analysis was to look at the condition of the water system as a whole, as well as to evaluate the system’s water age based upon concerns from the Town’s water operator. In general, the system performs adequately for the present and future demands of Opal. System upgrades to the wells are noted to bring the system into compliance with DEQ-WQD regulations. To address the concerns of water age in the system, several methods were evaluated separately and in various combinations to reduce the water age of the system. The recommended improvements from the Level I Study are prioritized and presented as follows in Table ES.4.


PLANNING DIVISION

1

Table ES.4 – Recommended Improvements

Priority Description Notes

1 Knoll Well Improvements The Knoll Wells (#1, #2 & #4), have deficiencies in regards to

Wyoming DEQ-WQD regulations.

2 Weekly Flush A 25,500 gallon weekly flush (4.25 hrs @ 100 gpm) will

reduce the Town's water age.

3 Hill Tank Solar Mixer A solar mixer will help with the stagnation in the Town’s Hill

Storage Tank as well as stabilize overall chlorine residuals.

4 4” Transmission Line A dedicated Hill Storage Tank transmission line will reduce

the Town’s tank’s water age.

Project cost (reflective of estimated 2018 construction costs with engineering and a 15% contingency), and rate payer impacts based on assumed funding scenarios are summarized in Table ES.5. Project loan payments are broken down by monthly cost per existing connection to determine the average potential rate impact. This table assumes that all matching funds would be borrowed and that the capital improvements in this study would be constructed in 2018. If all the recommended projects were completed with the proposed funding scenarios, the total monthly rate impact per ratepayer would be $64.38.

Table ES.5 – Project Rate Impacts

Item # Description

Estimated

Project

Cost

ASSUMED FUNDING SOURCE Monthly

Cost per

Ratepayer

(Based on

51 current

users)

WWDC

Grant (67%

new

construction)

SRF Loan

(2.5%, 20-

year)

Annual

Payment

1* Knoll Well

Improvements $7,202 $4,825 $2,377 $152 $0.25

1* Knoll Well

Improvements $1,433 $0 $1,433 $92 $0.15

2 Hill Tank Solar

Mixer $126,905 $0 $126,905 $8,141 $13.30

3 4” Transmission Line $483,476 $0 $483,476 $31,014 $50.68

Monthly Cost per Ratepayer - *Town has expressed that payment for Item #1

will not be incurred by rate payers but by Town Funds Total $64.38

PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town Draft Report 7/7/2016 Opal Town Hall, 651 N. Front St. Opal, Wyoming Final Report 9/13/2016 Opal Town Hall, 651 N. Front St. Opal, Wyoming

2

FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Opal/Opal-Master_Plan_Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Opal/Opal-Master_Plan_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Opal Master Plan, Level I project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:

Proceeding to the next Level of project development for those projects which may be eligible for WWDC, DWSRF or RUS funding.

3

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Opal/Opal-Master_Plan_Level_I-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Opal/Opal-Master_Plan_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Sublette Creek Reservoir Study

LEVEL: II PHASE: II SPONSOR: Cokeville Development Company LOCATION: Near Cokeville, Wyoming PROGRAM: Dams & Reservoirs PROJECT MGR: Tony Rutherford AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 125 2003 I $200,000 2004 Level II 85 2007 I $ 81,000 2008 Level II 66 2009 III $375,000 2010 Level II 1 2011 III $325,000 2014 Level II 66 2013 III $252,000 2016 CONTRACT: Consultant RJH Consultants, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC29390 3-18-13 $251,000 $250,998.63 $1.37 3-31-2016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Over the course of multiple decades, various attempts by the States of Wyoming, Utah, and Idaho, along with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, at discerning the feasibility associated with the construction of large dams and reservoirs on the Bear River and its Wyoming tributaries have proven difficult; however, the Cokeville Development Company (CDC) remained interested in developing a smaller, multipurpose, reservoir limited to serving Wyoming interests. In 2003, a Level I investigation of the Sublette Creek Watershed for potential reservoir sites and for the rehabilitation of the Covey/Mau Canals was requested by the CDC. Several potential sites and canal rehabilitation measures were identified by the Level I consultant. In 2007, a Level II, Phase I study followed which eliminated less efficient storage sites and further refined canal rehabilitation measures. The Level II, Phase I analysis was followed by a 2009 appropriation to conduct subsequent analysis of the more favorable reservoir sites and included refinement of hydrology, environmental and permitting considerations, and a geotechnical investigation. Based upon the study completed in 2010, the WWDC recommended that additional work be conducted to refine permitting requirements, designs, and cost estimates for the Sublette Creek Reservoir site and supply canal. To accommodate the recommendation, the Legislature appropriated funds during their 2011 General Session to conduct, primarily, additional hydrology, permitting, and biological studies. The January, 2013 Report recommended refining mitigation concepts, hydrologic modeling, and identification of potential beneficiaries and estimation of their ability to pay for stored water. In 2013, the Legislature approved an additional $252,000 for the project budget to further define costs associated with mitigation for wetlands, wildlife, fisheries, and cultural resources. Furthermore, land easement and acquisition costs and direct / indirect benefits were further analyzed.

FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT MEMO FOR LEVEL II PROJECTS

WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT OFFICE DAM AND RESERVOIR DIVISION

1

The analysis completed to date has progressed through the Level II, Phase II process with the next logical step being permitting (NEPA) and final design (Level II, Phase III) which is unique to the Dam and Reservoir Program. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The current reservoir concept, as proposed, involves a 56.5’ high, 2,720’ long, earthen embankment on Sublette Creek with a 4,200 acre-foot active capacity and no conservation pool. The source of water to fill the reservoir would be the Smiths Fork via the existing Covey Canal. The structure is estimated to cost approximately $26.7M with an eight out of ten year firm yield of 2,000 – 2,400 acre-feet. The bulk of the potential beneficiaries that currently experience seasonal irrigation water shortages would need to utilize stored water via “exchange” rather than direct releases. That is, “wet” water would need to be available in the Smiths Fork to be diverted out of priority in exchange for releasing stored water from Sublette Creek Reservoir to satisfy downstream Bear River senior priority water rights. The StateMod model estimated that approximately 3,000 acre-feet of water would be available for exchange through the month of July in five out of ten years based on the stipulations and scenarios defined by the work to date. In addition, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department expressed significant concerns with potential fisheries impacts on the Smiths Fork. The range of costs provided by the consultant, at varying grant/loan ratios (67/33, 75/25, and 95/5) and varying reservoir volume scenarios (selling shares of the entire reservoir capacity versus acre-feet of firm yield), that irrigators would have to pay for the stored water (including loan retirement and annual operation and maintenance) ranged from $17 per acre-foot to $178 per acre-foot annually. This information, along with the complete project related technical and scientific data from the draft report, was presented to the CDC in February, 2016 for feedback. In their March, 2016 Final Report, the consultant concluded that:

There appears to be a project that is technically feasible and likely permittable for a dam and reservoir on

Sublette Creek. Prior to advancement of the Project, the following items should be considered by the

WWDC:

The CDC may require a grant larger than 95 percent for the Project to be economically feasible.

Confirm beneficiaries and interested parties and identify if they would be directly served by the

reservoir or would require exchanges at the Covey Canal.

Evaluate approaches other than maintaining a large monthly minimum stream flow to reduce the

potential for critically high water temperatures in Smiths Fork that could increase historic fish

stress levels. The WGFD should be included in this evaluation. One possible approach would be

to monitor water temperature, air temperature, and flow and adjust operations on specific days to

manage water temperature in Smiths Fork.

Prior to the creation of the current closeout procedure, a letter was sent to the consultant documenting the Office’s acceptance of the final deliverables and the final Contract amount. The letter also acknowledged cessation of all work under the Contract.

After the Report presentation to the CDC, the CDC was provided an additional report regarding the economics of the proposed project by the Uinta County Extension Agent. Upon the review of the report by the CDC Directors and consideration of the WWDC information, the CDC determined that the project was not economically feasible at a 95% grant. A letter was sent from the CDC to the WWDO Director in May, 2016 requesting consideration of a 100% grant to fund the construction of the Sublette Creek Reservoir Project. The letter suggested that the water users could pay for the annual operation and maintenance of the facility at an estimated $4.00 per acre-foot but warned “this still would be challenging…” based on the limited opportunity for water users to benefit via water exchange. PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: No Date Location City/Town 2-10-2016 Cokeville Town Hall Cokeville, WY

2

FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Final_Report-2016.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Execut_Summary-2016.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: Based on the limited potential to benefit the public, the lack of the CDC forming a public entity as described by WWDC criteria, and the CDC’s limited ability to pay for the project, it is the WWDO’s recommendation to terminate further consideration of the Sublette Creek Reservoir project. WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Sublette Creek Reservoir Level II, Phase II project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:

Terminating further consideration of the proposed project.

3

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Final_Report-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Execut_Summary-2016.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/Sublette_Creek/Sublette_Creek_Reservoir_Mau_Covey_Canal-Rehab_Level_II_Phase_II_Project-Execut_Summary-2016.html

The Planning Project listed below is complete and scheduled for closeout. This memo serves to summarize the findings of the final report and to document the final contract amount. PROJECT: Upper North Platte River Watershed Study

LEVEL: I SPONSOR: Saratoga Encampment Rawlins Conservation District LOCATION: Carbon County PROGRAM: New Development PROJECT MGR: Peter Gill AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION: Purpose Chapter Session Account Appropriation Due Date Level I 74 2014 I $375,000 2017 CURRENT CONTRACT: Consultant Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Original Final Contract Contract Contract Savings Expiration Contract Number Executed Amount Amount Amount Date 05SC0295856 6-10-14 $349,000 $308,497.97 $40,502.03 12-31-16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: In 2013 the Saratoga Encampment Rawlins Conservation District (SERCD) requested funding from WWDC for the completion of a watershed management plan for the Upper North Platte River watershed. The intent of the funding request was to have a comprehensive watershed inventory completed which identified issues related to land use and water resources and to then develop a plan addressing those issues. The WWDC approved funding for the project and Anderson Consulting Engineers, Inc. was ultimately contracted in June, 2014 to complete the project. PROJECT FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The watershed inventory compiled GIS data and reports related to the physical, biological, and built systems of the watershed. Analysis of the data resulted in a characterization of land use, stream flows, upland water availability, stream conditions, and water infrastructure. There are over 500 surface water diversions in the watershed, irrigating 79,000 acres (2012) with a significant portion of the water rights pre-dating 1900. Flood irrigation is the dominant method of irrigation. Water rights regulation is common in and after July, specifically on Jack Creek, Pass Creek, Brush Creek, and South Spring Creek. Remote analysis of nearly 900 stock reservoirs/ponds indicates that 158 reservoirs are “non-functional” water sources, as they are breached, sediment filled, or in need of a site visit to determine issues. The majority of the project recommendations involved rehabilitation or replacement of irrigation structures with a total of forty six (46) projects identified. Forty of these would be eligible for Small Water Project Program (SWPP) funding as their total costs would be less than $135,000 each. Construction of all projects


PLANNING DIVISION

1

eligible for Small Water Project Program funding would require approximately $1,179,000. The remaining projects would like require Level II investigations and would potentially add over $1,000,000 to complete. A total of eighteen (18) livestock and wildlife water supply projects were included in the plan. Construction of all livestock projects would require approximately $538,000 to complete. Several of the irrigation projects identified involved costly repairs or replacement of existing facilities and would not be eligible for funding through the SWPP. For the projects listed below, landowners and ditch owners should consider district formation (where applicable) and application to the WWDC for level II evaluation and potential project funding: a. IRR-029: Encampment Platte Valley Ditch Diversion b. IRR-041: South Brush Creek Supply Ditch c. IRR-043: Kurtz-Chatterton Ditch d. IRR-045: Enlarged Encampment Range Ditch (Billie Creek Ditch) e. IRR-046: Wagoner Cherokee Ditch Diversion PUBLIC REPORT PRESENTATION HEARING: N Date Location City/Town 8-24-16 Platte Valley Community Center Saratoga, WY 210 W. Elm Avenue FINAL REPORT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ONLINE: Final Report: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html Executive Summary: http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2015.html WWDO RECOMMENDATION: Projects described in the Watershed Study are intended to incrementally rehabilitate watershed function, improve riparian areas, stream stability, rangeland management, fish passage, and water quality. The Watershed Study provides analysis of watershed conditions, and through the projects identified in the rehabilitation plan, demonstrate how these types of projects provide public benefit. Based on this study, the Office recommends supporting the funding of Small Water Program projects and conventional projects within this watershed pending submittal of an appropriate funding application by a legal entity (sponsor). WWDC PROPOSED MOTION: I move acceptance of the Upper North Platte River Watershed Study Level I project report as being complete and further, the WWDC makes the following findings relative to this project: 1. That the Commission recommend:


2

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Final_Report-2015.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2015.html

http://library.wrds.uwyo.edu/wwdcrept/North_Platte/Upper_North_Platte_River-Watershed_Study_Level_I-Executive_Summary-2015.html

PROJECT: SPONSOR:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 201,000.00$ WWDC Account: ACCOUNT IWWDC Grant Amount: 201,000.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2014WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2019

Funding Source #2: AVISDAmount: 99,000.00$ 33.0%

Total Project Budget: 300,000.00$ 100.0%

ENGINEERING

Engineer: Entech Agreement Date: May-12-2015Design Fee: 36,701.00$ Construction Fee: 33,565.00$ Total Fee: 70,266.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Aug-04-2016 Number of Bids: 4Low Bidder: DRM Range of Bids: 234k to 347kEngineer's Estimate: 298,947.00$ Agreement Date: Aug-15-2016Contractor Amount: 234,881.23$ Construction Time: 60 Days

MISCELLANEOUS COSTS (Easements, Permits, Title Of Opinion, Title Search etc.)

Misc. Costs

PROJECT CLOSEOUT

Final Project Cost: Date:WWDC Funding Share:Other Funding Sources:WWDC Reverted Funding:

PROJECT STATUS

Keith Brookshire

The project bid in early August. Construction will start in mid October and should wrap up by January 2017.

WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMISSIONLEVEL III CONSTRUCTION REPORT

November-2016

Antelope Valley Regional Connection Antelope Valley Improvement and Service District

This project will provide a connection to AVISD from the Gillette Regional Water System

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 1,728,600.00$ WWDC Account: ACCOUNT IWWDC Grant Amount: 1,728,600.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2015WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 7/1/2020

Funding Source #2: City of CasperAmount: 851,400.00$ 33.0%

Total Project Budget: 2,580,000.00$ 100.0%

ENGINEERING

Engineer: WLC Agreement Date: Aug-02-2016Design Fee: 123,300.00$ Construction Fee: 179,500.00$ Total Fee: 302,800.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Number of Bids:Low Bidder: Range of Bids:Engineer's Estimate: Agreement Date:Contractor Amount: Construction Time:


Misc. Costs

PROJECT CLOSEOUT


PROJECT STATUS

William Brewer, P.E., P.G.

This project is currently in the design phase.


November-2016

Casper Zone II 2015 City of Casper

Design and construction of a transmission pipeline and appurtencces necessary to make the project function.

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 194,300.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: ACCOUNT IIWWDC Grant Amount: 194,300.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2016WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2021

Funding Source #2: LIDAmount: 95,700.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: Sage Engineering Agreement Date: Oct-12-2016Design Fee: 20,250.00$ Construction Fee: 20,250.00$ Total Fee: 40,500.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Number of Bids:Low Bidder: Range of Bids:Engineer's Estimate: Agreement Date:Contractor Amount: Construction Time:


Misc. Costs

PROJECT CLOSEOUT


PROJECT STATUS

Keith Brookshire

LID has retained Sage Engineering for design and construction management services.


November-2016

Lakeview Irrigation Rehabilitation 2016 Lakeview Irrigation District

Project will replace the Bull Creek Siphon.

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 93,800.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: I WWDC Grant Amount: 93,800.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2016WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2021

Funding Source #2: RUSAmount: 46,200.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: James Gores & Assoc. Agreement Date: Sep-22-2016Design Fee: 18,010.00$ Construction Fee: 14,390.00$ Total Fee: 32,400.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Number of Bids:Low Bidder: Range of Bids:Engineer's Estimate: -$ Agreement Date:Contractor Amount: -$ Construction Time:


Misc. Costs -$

PROJECT CLOSEOUT

Final Project Cost: -$ Date:WWDC Funding Share: -$ Other Funding Sources: -$ WWDC Reverted Funding: -$

PROJECT STATUS

Ken Mitchell

The project agreement was signed on 6/8/2016. The engineering contract was awarded to James Gores & Associates, and the project has entered the design phase.


November-2016

Meeteetse Tank SCADA Retrofit Town of Meeteetse

Retrofit existing tank vault to eliminate confinced space and upgrade SCADA system

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 381,000.00$ WWDC Account: ACCOUNT 2WWDC Grant Amount: 381,000.00$ 100.0% Session Law: 2015WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2018

WWDC reimburses Sponsor for 100% of invoiced materials costs only

Funding Source #2: Midvale Irrigation DistrictAmount: 0.0%

Sponsor is responsibloe for project Labor, Equipment and Engineering


ENGINEERING

Engineer: APEX Surveying, Inc. Agreement Date: est 6/23/2013Design Fee: naConstruction Fee: naTotal Fee: na

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Jun-11-2015 Number of Bids: 3Low Bidder: Waterworks, Ferguson Range of Bids: 148k-152kEngineer's Estimate: 119,700.00$ Agreement Date: est 6/20/2015Contractor Bid Amount: 148,355.50$ Construction Time: 31-Aug-15

Bid Opening Date: Jun-11-2015 Number of Bids: 1Low Bidder: Big Horn Truck & Equipment Range of Bids: 6177.74Engineer's Estimate: 14,521.50$ Agreement Date: est 6/20/2015Contractor Bid Amount: 6,177.74$ Construction Time: 30-Sep-15

Bid Opening Date: Dec-14-2015 Number of Bids: 1Low Bidder: Flowmation, Inc. Range of Bids: 63,305.00$ Engineer's Estimate: 60,000.00$ Agreement Date: est 12/18/15Contractor Bid Amount: 63,305.00$ Construction Time: est 5/1/16

Concrete / Steel / Misc. Const. Costs Number of Bids:Contractor Bid Amount: 86,244.94$ Construction Time: est 5/1/16


Misc. Costs -$

Dale Anderson


November-2016

Midvale Rehabilitation 2013 Midvale Irrigation District

Water lateral improvements.

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER: Dale Anderson


November-2016

Midvale Rehabilitation 2013 Midvale Irrigation District

Water lateral improvements.

PROJECT CLOSEOUT

Final Project Cost: 304,083.18$ Date: Aug-09-2016WWDC Funding Share: 304,083.18$ Other Funding Sources: -$ WWDC Reverted Funding: 76,916.82$

PROJECT STATUS

Project is complete.

2

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 2,144,000.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: ACCOUNT IIWWDC Grant Amount: 2,144,000.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2015WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2020

Funding Source #2: City of SheridanAmount: 1,056,000.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: DOWL Agreement Date: Oct-26-2015Design Fee: 220,000.00$ Construction Fee:Total Fee: 220,000.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Aug-09-2016 Number of Bids: 2Low Bidder: Lillard & Clark Range of Bids: $2.1M - $2.7MEngineer's Estimate: 2,315,000.00$ Agreement Date: Sep-13-2016Contractor Amount: 2,130,000.00$ Construction Time: 120


Misc. Costs

PROJECT CLOSEOUT


PROJECT STATUS

Keenan Hendon

This project is in the construction phase.


November-2016

Sheridan 4MG Tank City of Sheridan

Design and construction of a water storage tank.

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 871,000.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: ACCOUNT IIWWDC Grant Amount: 871,000.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2015WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2020

Funding Source #2: S-LSRCDAmount: 429,000.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: S-LSRCD Agreement Date:Design Fee: N/AConstruction Fee: N/ATotal Fee: -$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Oct-01-2015 Number of Bids: 2Low Bidder: C&B Sand and Gravel Range of Bids: 276k to 291kEngineer's Estimate: 249,325.00$ Agreement Date: Dec-09-2015Contractor Amount: 284,400.00$ Construction Time: 213 days

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Aug-09-2016 Number of Bids: 4Low Bidder: HB Lee Const. Range of Bids: 470k to 532kEngineer's Estimate: 499,985.00$ Agreement Date: Aug-16-2016Contractor Amount: 470,805.20$ Construction Time: 120 Days


Misc. Costs

PROJECT CLOSEOUT


PROJECT STATUS

Keith Brookshire

The Raught Diversion rock procurement contract and the construction contract have been let and should be complete by the end of 2016.


November-2016

S-LSRCD Battle Creek Diversions Savery - Little Snake River Water Conservancy District

Project will re-build two diversion structures. One on Battle Creek and the other on the Little Snake River.

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 3,557,700.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: I WWDC Grant Amount: 3,557,700.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2016WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2021

Funding Source #2: RUSAmount: 1,752,300.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: Dowl Agreement Date: Jul-29-2016Design Fee: 540,000.00$ Construction Fee: 494,000.00$ Total Fee: 1,034,000.00$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Number of Bids:Low Bidder: Range of Bids:Engineer's Estimate: -$ Agreement Date:Contractor Amount: -$ Construction Time:


Misc. Costs -$

PROJECT CLOSEOUT

Final Project Cost: -$ Date:WWDC Funding Share: -$ Other Funding Sources: -$ WWDC Reverted Funding: -$

PROJECT STATUS

Ken Mitchell

The project agreement was signed on 6/19/2016. The engineering contract was awarded to Dowl Engineering. The contract was fully executed, and the project has entered the design phase.


November-2016

South Big Horn County Pipeline South Big Horn County Rural Water District

Design and construction of 8.7 miles of 10-inch pipeline, 3.8 miles of 6-inch pipeline, and pump station

1

PROJECT: SPONSOR:


WWDC MANAGER:

FUNDING

WWDC Appropriation: 2,318,200.00$ 67.0% WWDC Account: Account IWWDC Grant Amount: 2,318,200.00$ 67.0% Session Law: 2010WWDC Loan Amount: -$ 0.0% Reversion Date: 2017

Funding Source #2: S. Thermopolis W&S DistrictAmount: 1,141,800.00$ 33.0%


ENGINEERING

Engineer: Engineering Associates Agreement Date: Jan-01-2012Design Fee: 392,000.00$ Construction Fee: 299,999.87$ Total Fee: 691,999.87$

CONSTRUCTION

Bid Opening Date: Mar-16-2015 Number of Bids: 7Low Bidder: MVB Range of Bids: $3.06M-$3.73MEngineer's Estimate: 3,095,721.00$ Agreement Date: Apr-24-2015Contractor Amount: 3,107,789.00$ Construction Time: 150


Misc. Costs 59,294.03$

PROJECT CLOSEOUT

Final Project Cost: 3,859,082.90$ Date: Oct-13-2016WWDC Funding Share: 1,974,754.87$ Other Funding Sources: 1,884,328.03$ WWDC Reverted Funding: 343,445.13$

PROJECT STATUS

Keenan Hendon

This project is completed and closed out.


November-2016

S. Thermopolis Water Supply Project S. Thermopolis W&S District

Design and construction of a transmission pipeline and storage tank.

1

THE STATE OF WYOMING

Water Development Office 6920 YELLOWTAIL ROAD TELEPHONE: (307) 777-7626 CHEYENNE, WY 82002

FAX: (307) 777-6819

MEMORANDUM

Memorandum Clearmont Test Well, Level II Study, Interim Contract Amendment No. 1 Wyoming Water Development Office Page 1

TO: Water Development Commission DATE: October 10, 2016

FROM: Keith E. Clarey, P.G. REFERENCE: Clearmont Test Well, Level II Study, 2015

SUBJECT: Contract Amendment No. 1 for Clearmont Test Well, Level II Study

Contents

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 Contract Amendment No. 1 Rationale ..................................................................................... 2

ATTACHMENT 1.0 Introduction

The WWDC Clearmont Test Well, Level II Study commenced in mid-June 2015 for the purpose of the siting, construction, development, and aquifer testing of an additional test/production well for the Town of Clearmont (Sponsor). The purpose of the study was to provide additional groundwater supply and back-up water supply for the Town. The existing Level II Consultant Contract is for the amount of $567,400 with an expiration date of June 30, 2018. As of October 10, 2016, the current Contract Balance is approximately $149,390 and the current Uncommitted Appropriated Funds are approximately $182,334. During early 2016, a deep test/production well was constructed into the Paleocene age Tongue River Member of the Fort Union Formation. The well was drilled to a total depth of 1,626 feet below ground surface in April 2016. The new well was subsequently aquifer tested and the produced water was analyzed by various field and laboratory methods for EPA drinking water standards. Weston Engineering, Inc. (Consultant) prepared a Technical Memorandum, dated July 16, 2016, describing the construction and testing of the new well (Clearmont Well No. 3). The new test/production well yields 120 gallons per minute (gpm), but the produced groundwater is elevated in total dissolved solids (TDS), sodium, alkalinity, and bicarbonate. In addition, the fluoride level approached the EPA drinking water standard of 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The Town of Clearmont has expressed concerns about the lower water quality of the new test/production well compared to the Town’s existing water supply wells (Clearmont Wells No. 1 and No. 2). The Town is also concerned about the purchase of the new well and connection of the well to the existing Town water system under a possible Level III construction project.


2.0 Contract Amendment No. 1 Rationale

During the 2016 construction of the new test well, it was observed that there was an increased thickness of alluvial deposits (~70 feet in thickness) penetrated at the test well site. These alluvial deposits were observed to be water-bearing. This increased thickness exceeds the average of approximately 25 feet of alluvial deposits near Clear Creek in the vicinity of the Town and provides a potential target for a shallow alluvial well. The Town of Clearmont has expressed an interest in a possible alluvial well, if the water quality was better than that of the two existing Town wells. The water from a potential alluvial well may be of better quality and could potentially be used to blend with water from the two wells to increase palatability (reduce sodium or ‘saltiness’). However, the alluvial well water may need to be treated as a surface water supply under the EPA rules and regulations. The drilling contractor for this Level II study has provided a cost estimate of approximately $40,000 for constructing and testing an alluvial well to a depth of 70 feet in the area adjacent to the Clearmont Well No. 3. Currently, there is approximately $15,000 remaining in the well construction Contract budget (Phase I, Task 6). Approximately $10,000 also remains in the permitting task and the well construction/testing oversight task under the Contract (Phase I, Tasks 2 and 6, respectively). In a letter to the WWDC, dated September 28, 2016, Weston Engineering, Inc., (Consultant), estimated a $30,000 increase to the current contract was required to construct and test an additional alluvial well (~70 feet deep) under this Level II study. The September 28, 2016 Weston letter concluded: “Weston has determined that drilling an alluvial

well . . . would offer the benefits of exhausting all options for obtaining a good source of supply

for the Town of Clearmont at an economical price. Additionally, if the [alluvial] well were

successful, even if treatment were needed, the purchase price to the Town would be significantly

lower than the current test well.”

ATTACHMENT – Weston Engineering, Inc., September 28, 2016 Letter

RN101716/F

AMENDMENT ONE TO CLEARMONT TEST WELL, LEVEL II STUDY BETWEEN WWDC AND WESTON ENGINEERING, INC.

Page 1 of 4

AMENDMENT ONE TO CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR SERVICES NO. 05SC0296302

CLEARMONT TEST WELL, LEVEL II STUDY BETWEEN WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

AND WESTON ENGINEERING, INC.

1. Parties. This Amendment is made and entered into by and between the Wyoming Water Development Commission [Commission], 6920 Yellowtail Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002; and Weston Engineering, Inc.[Consultant], P.O. Box 260, 1401 Highway 16E, Upton, WY 82730.

2. Purpose. This Amendment shall constitute the First Amendment to the Contract between the Commission and the Consultant. The purpose of this Amendment is to increase the total Contract dollar amount by thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00), adding to Phase I, Task 6, for the installation of a shallow alluvial test well. The Contract expiration date is not changed by this Amendment. The total Contract amount hereby increases by thirty thousand dollars $30,000.00, from five hundred sixty-seven thousand, four hundred dollars ($567,400.00) to five hundred ninety-seven thousand, four hundred dollars ($597,400.00).

The original Contract, dated June 8, 2015, required the Consultant to conduct a Level II feasibility test well study for the Town of Clearmont, Wyoming [Sponsor], for a total Contract amount of five hundred sixty-seven thousand, four hundred dollars ($567,400.00) with an expiration date of June 30, 2018.

3. Term of the Amendment. This Amendment shall commence immediately

upon the date the last required signature is affixed hereto, and shall remain in full force and effect through the term of this Contract, as amended, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions of the Contract, or pursuant to federal or state statute, rule or regulation. The Contract expiration date is June 30, 2018.

4. Amendments.

A. The second sentence of Section 4A. of the original Contract is hereby

amended to read as follows: Total payment under this Contract shall not exceed Five Hundred Ninety-

Seven Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($597,400.00). B. The entire section of 4 B. of the Original Contract is hereby amended

to read as follows: 4.B Project Budget. The Project budget for each task included in Exhibit

A is as follows:

RN101716/F


Page 2 of 4

Task Estimated Cost

Phase I. Meetings, Drilling/Testing Program

1. Meetings $ 13,000.00

2. Well Siting, Permits, Drilling/Testing Program $ 20,000.00

3. Bid Specifications, Bid Process $ 11,000.00

4. Consultant Services During Well Construction/Testing $ 35,000.00

5. Water Quality, Treatment, Reclamation $ 33,300.00

6. Well Construction Subcontracts $ 390,000.00

Subtotal Phase I $ 502,300.00

Phase II. Conceptual Designs, Cost Estimates, Reports

1. Geotechnical Analysis $ 11,100.00

2. Identification of Alternatives $ 13,000.00

3. Preparation of Preliminary Cost Estimates $ 10,000.00

4. Selection of Preferred Alternatives $ 5,000.00

5. Conceptual Designs and Cost Estimates $ 14,000.00

6. Water System Financing $ 7,500.00

7. Identification of Permits and ROW for Construction $ 2,000.00

8. Environmental Report $ 7,500.00

9. Reports $ 25,000.00

Subtotal Phase II $ 95,100.00 PROJECT TOTAL COST $597,400.00 The amounts for each task are estimates only, but are not to be exceeded unless authorized in writing by the Commission. The Contract total amount is controlling. Payment shall be made directly to the Consultant. The Consultant shall maintain hourly records of time worked by its personnel to support any audits the state or the Commission may require. Billing reports shall be submitted no more often than monthly for activities and costs accrued since the last billing report and shall be made on forms provided by the Office. The Consultant may use alternate billing forms if approved in advance by the Office project manager. A brief project progress report summarizing project activities in the billing period must be submitted with each billing.

5. Amended Responsibilities of Consultant.

The Consultant shall construct, develop, test, and evaluate an additional alluvial test/production well under Phase I of this project.

RN101716/F


Page 3 of 4

6. Amended Responsibilities of Commission.

Responsibilities of the Commission have not changed.

7. Special Provisions.

A. Same Terms and Conditions. With the exception of items explicitly delineated in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Contract, and any previous amendments, between the Commission and the Consultant, including but not limited to sovereign immunity, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

8. General Provisions.

A. Entirety of Contract. The Original Contract consisting of twelve (12) pages, Exhibit A consisting of twenty (20) pages, Exhibit B consisting of one (1) page, and Amendment One, consisting of four (4) pages, represent the entire and integrated Contract between the parties and supersede all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements whether written or oral.

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

RN101716/F


Page 4 of 4

9. Signatures. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties to this Amendment through their duly authorized representatives have executed this Amendment on the days and dates set out below, and certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions of this Amendment as set forth herein.

This Amendment is not binding on either party until approved by A&I Procurement and the Governor of the State of Wyoming or his designee, if required by WYO. Stat § 9-2-1016(b)(iv).


___________________________________________ _________________ Sheridan Little Date Chairman ___________________________________________ _________________ Todd Werbelow Date Secretary Attest: _______________________________________ WESTON ENGINEERING, INC. ___________________________________________ _________________ Jerry Hunt, P.E., Secretary/Treasurer Date Employer Identification Number: 83-0240969 Attest: _____________________________________ ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE APPROVAL AS TO FORM ___________________________________________ ________________ Samantha Caselli Date Assistant Attorney General

RN102416/F

AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO NOWOOD RIVER STORAGE, LEVEL II STUDY BETWEEN WWDC AND TRIHYDRO CORPORATION

Page 1 of 6

AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR SERVICES NO. 05SC0294168

NOWOOD RIVER STORAGE STUDY, LEVEL II BETWEEN WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

AND TRIHYDRO CORPORATION

1. Parties. This Amendment is made and entered into by and between the Wyoming Water Development Commission [Commission], 6920 Yellowtail Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 and Trihydro Corporation [Consultant], whose address is: 1252 Commerce Drive, Laramie, Wyoming, 82070.

2. Purpose of Amendment. This Amendment shall constitute the fifth amendment to the Contract between the Commission and the Consultant. The purpose of this Amendment is to supplement existing and add additional Phase III tasks for permitting assistance on Alkali Creek Reservoir as provided herein, increase the total Contract dollar amount by one hundred forty-five thousand dollars ($145,000.00) to one million five hundred six thousand seven hundred forty dollars ($1,506,740.00) and to extend the term of the Contract through March 31, 2020.

The original Contract, dated June 4, 2010, required the Contractor to render certain technical or professional services for a total Contract amount of two hundred forty-five thousand seven hundred forty dollars ($245,740.00) with an expiration date of June 30, 2012.

Amendment No. 1, dated March 19, 2012, amended the original Contract to add Level II, Phase II tasks, increasing the total Contract amount by three hundred thirty-nine thousand five hundred dollars ($339,500.00) to five hundred eighty-five thousand two hundred forty dollars ($585,240.00) and extended the term of the Contract through December 31, 2013. Amendment No. 2, dated November 18, 2013, extended the term of the Contract through August 31, 2015.

Amendment No. 3, dated March 24, 2014, amended the Contract to supplement existing tasks to assist the WWDO in project coordination, stream gauging, hydrologic model refinement, environmental assessment, project economics, and reporting, increasing the total Contract amount by two hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($225,000.00) to eight hundred ten thousand two hundred forty dollars ($810,240.00) and extended the term of the Contract through March 31, 2016. Amendment No. 4, dated March 24, 2015, amended the Contract to supplement existing Phase II tasks to perform work on a potential Meadowlark Lake enlargement and to add Phase III tasks for permitting assistance on Alkali Creek Reservoir, increasing the total Contract amount by five hundred fifty-one thousand five hundred dollars ($551,500.00) to one million three hundred sixty-one thousand seven hundred forty dollars ($1,361,740.00)

RN102416/F


Page 2 of 6

amended Exhibit B Hourly Rate and Reimbursable Expenses Price Schedule, and extended the term of the Contract through March 31, 2019.

3. Term of the Amendment. This Amendment shall commence immediately upon the date the last required signature is affixed hereto, and shall remain in full force and effect through the term of this Contract, as amended, unless terminated at an earlier date pursuant to the provisions of the Contract, or pursuant to federal or state statute, rule or regulation.

4. Amendments.

A. The second sentence of Section 4. A. of the original Contract is

hereby amended to read as follows: The total payment under this Contract shall not exceed one million

five hundred six thousand seven hundred forty dollars ($1,506,740.00). B. The entire Section 4. B. of the original Contract is hereby amended

to read as follows: 4. B. Project Budget. The Project budget for each task included in Exhibit

A is as follows:

Task Estimated Cost Phase I Task 1. Scoping and Project Meetings $ 34,445.12 Task 2. Literature and Model Review 1,251.31 Task 3. Access 2,706.99 Task 4. Hydrologic Analysis 46,522.28 Task 5. Purpose and Need 2,420.58 Task 6. Identification of Alternatives 21,825.40 Task 7. Temporary Stream Gauging 20,431.44 Task 8. Alternatives Analysis 13,102.74 Task 9. Permitting and Environmental Mitigation 6,881.32 Task 10. Archeological Investigation 3,374.02 Task 11. Geotechnical Investigation 11,819.74 Task 12. Preliminary Designs and Cost Estimates 28,885.98 Task 13. Economic Analysis 2,216.30 Task 14. Develop Preferred Alternatives 6,674.80 Task 15. Geographic Information System 1,130.07 Task 16. Discretionary Task 5,897.89 Task 17. Reports 36,154.02 Phase I Total $245,740.00

RN102416/F


Page 3 of 6

Task Estimated Cost Phase II

Task 1. Project Management, Scheduling and Coordination $ 153,250.00 Task 2. Continued Temporary Stream Gauging 86,500.00 Task 3. Hydrologic Model Refinement 74,500.00 Task 4. Purpose and Need 11,500.00 Task 5. Environmental Assessment and Permitting 153,000.00 Task 6. Geotechnical Investigation 95,750.00 Task 7. Surveying 62,500.00 Task 8. Conceptual Designs 53,000.00 Task 9. Cost Estimates 14,750.00 Task 10. Economic Analysis 39,250.00 Task 11. Discretionary Task 50,000.00 Task 12. Reports 69,000.00

Phase II Total $863,000.00

Task Estimated Cost Phase III – Alkali Creek Task 1. NEPA Liaison and Coordination $ 73,000.00 Task 2. Pre-Application Meetings with Federal Agencies 9,000.00 Task 3. Draft EIS Scope and Assist in NEPA Contractor Selection 18,000.00 Task 4. Preparation of BLM Right-of-Way Application 8,500.00 Task 5. Preparation of USCOE Section 404 Permit Application 8,500.00 Task 6. Preparation of Mitigation and Monitoring Plan 10,000.00 Task 7. Assistance with Drafting BLM ROD 10,500.00 Task 8. Preparation of USCOE 404(b)(1) Showing Document 8,000.00 Task 9. USFWS Coordination 17,500.00 Task 10. NHPA Section 106 Coordination 15,000.00 Task 11. WDEQ Section 401 Permitting 6,000.00 Task 12. Wyoming State Engineer’s Office Permitting 19,000.00 Task 13. Discretionary Task 90,000.00 Task 14. Land Appraisal 15,000.00 Task 15. Cultural/Paleontology Survey 90,000.00 Phase III Total $398,000.00

PROJECT TOTAL COST $1,506,740.00

The amounts for each task are estimates only, but are not to be exceeded unless authorized in writing by the Commission. The Contract total amount is controlling. Payment shall be made directly to the Consultant. The Consultant shall maintain hourly records of time worked by its personnel to support any audits the state or the Commission may require. Billing reports shall be submitted no more often than monthly for activities and costs accrued since the last billing report and shall be made on forms provided by the Office. The Consultant may use alternate billing forms if approved in advance by the Office project manager. A brief project progress report summarizing project activities in the billing period must be submitted with each billing.

RN102416/F


Page 4 of 6

C. The second sentence of Section 3 of the original Contract is hereby amended to read as follows:

The term of this Contract is from June 3, 2010 through March 31, 2020.

5. Additional Responsibilities of the Consultant. Responsibilities of the Consultant are hereby amended as follows: Exhibit A, Scope of Services of the Contract, is amended as stipulated below.

Supplement or add the following Phase III tasks for the Alkali Creek Reservoir alternative in Exhibit A, Scope of Services: Task 13. Discretionary Task The Consultant will place an additional $40,000 in this discretionary task. The task is to allow changes in the scope as the project develops or as new issues are discovered. Task 14. Land Appraisal The Consultant shall complete land appraisals which will be required as part of the project development process to facilitate the potential purchase of project related lands by the WWDC. The lands that may be purchased include existing private lands as well as current Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands that may be exchanged with private landowners. Therefore, the Consultant shall appraise areas on both BLM and private land within the project area to estimate the current market value of the surface estate of the subject property, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Elements of comparison to be considered in the appraisal process will include, but are not limited to, conditions of sale, market conditions (time), productivity (if applicable), size, location, legal and physical access, terrain, streams/trees, view, recreational amenities, availability of utilities, zoning and any other relevant market factors that the Consultant may identify, which influence highest and best use, marketability and market value. Value adjustments will be derived and/or supported from market data whenever possible. Task 15. Cultural/Paleontological Survey The Consultant shall conduct an agency coordination meeting in Worland to coordinate with the BLM to further define and confirm survey areas. A Class III cultural resource survey and visual contrast rating shall be performed for project areas, based on input received from the BLM during the coordination meeting. The area may include the Anita and Anita Supplemental ditches, depending on BLM input. The Class III survey shall include conducting a cultural records review of previous work completed in sections containing portions of the Alkali Creek Reservoir project. The Class III survey shall be completed in accordance with Wyoming-specific guidelines and requirements from the

RN102416/F


Page 5 of 6

BLM and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The survey shall be completed by a BLM-approved archaeologist or cultural resources firm. A paleontological survey of the Alkali Creek Reservoir project area shall also be completed by the Consultant, for exposed Cloverly and Morrison Formations that have not been previously surveyed. The paleontological survey shall be completed under a BLM Paleontological Resource Use Permit and in accordance with BLM paleontological resource management requirements. The areas to be surveyed for cultural and paleontological resources shall include both public and private lands. The surveys will require coordination with public land agencies and private landowners. Reports summarizing the findings of the surveys shall be provided to the BLM for review. These reports shall be prepared according to SHPO reporting standards and guidelines. A summary of the findings shall be provided to the Office.

6. Additional Responsibilities of the Commission. Responsibilities of the Commission have not changed.

7. Special Provisions.

A. Same Terms and Conditions. With the exception of items explicitly delineated in this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the original Contract, and any previous amendments, between the Commission and the Consultant, including but not limited to sovereign immunity, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

8. General Provisions.

A. Entirety of Contract. The original Contract consisting of eleven (11) pages, Exhibit A consisting of fourteen (14) pages, and Exhibit B consisting of two (2) pages, Amendment No. 1, consisting of eleven (11) pages, Amendment No. 2, consisting of two (2) pages, Amendment No. 3, consisting of five (5) pages, Amendment No. 4, consisting of thirteen (13) pages and Amendment No. 5 consisting of six (6) pages, represent the entire and integrated Contract between the parties and supersede all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements, whether written or oral.

THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

RN102416/F


Page 6 of 6

9. Signatures. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties to this Amendment through their duly authorized representatives have executed this Amendment on the days and dates set out below, and certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the terms and conditions of this Amendment as set forth herein.

This Amendment is not binding on either party until approved by A&I Procurement and the Governor of the State of Wyoming or his designee, if required by Wyo. Stat § 9-2-1016(b)(iv).


___________________________________________ _________________ Sheridan Little Date Chairman ___________________________________________ _________________ Todd Werbelow Date Secretary Attest: _____________________________________ TRIHYDRO CORPORATION ___________________________________________ _________________ Deby L. Forry, Vice President Risk Management Date Employer Identification Number: 83-0272860 Attest: _____________________________________ ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE APPROVAL AS TO FORM ___________________________________________ _________________ Samantha Caselli Date Assistant Attorney General

2016-17 WWDC/SWC MEETING SCHEDULE

(Revised – August 2016) Date Day Program Item

NOVEMBER November 9, 2016 Wed WWDC/SWC Workshop (Casper) November 10-11, 2016 Thurs-Fri WWDC/SWC Joint Meeting (Preliminary Funding recommendations) (Casper)

DECEMBER December 14-15, 2016 Wed-Thur WWDC Workshop/Meeting (Final Funding Recommendations) (Cheyenne) December 16, 2016 Friday Select Water Committee Meeting (Review draft Omnibus Water Bills) (Cheyenne)

__________________________________________________________________________________

MARCH

March 2, 2017 Thursday WWDC Workshop (Cheyenne)

March 3, 2017 Friday WWDC Meeting, Scopes & Short List

__________________________________________________________________________________

MAY

May 2-4, 2017 Tue-Thurs WWDC Consultant Selection Interviews (Cheyenne)

May 5, 2017 Friday WWDC Meeting, Selection Approval

__________________________________________________________________________________

JUNE

June 8, 2017 Thursday WWDC/SWC Workshop (Cheyenne)

June 9, 2017 Friday WWDC/SWC Joint Meeting, Contract Approval

__________________________________________________________________________________

AUGUST

August 23-25, 2017 Wed-Fri WWDC/SWC Workshop/Summer Tour/ Meeting

(TBD)

__________________________________________________________________________________

NOVEMBER

November 1, 2017 Wed WWDC/SWC Workshop (Casper)

November 2-3, 2017 Thurs-Fri WWDC/SWC Joint Meeting (Preliminary Funding Recs)

(Casper)

__________________________________________________________________________________

State Engineer’s Report Update on

Documents

Transcript of State Engineer’s Report Update on