Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

16
The Effect of Domestic and Foreign Political Events on the US and London Stock Markets Wasif Ali Michael Bechara Priya Chandrashekar Zhanpeng Ruan

Transcript of Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Page 1: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

The Effect of Domestic and Foreign Political

Events on the US and London Stock Markets

Wasif AliMichael Bechara

Priya ChandrashekarZhanpeng Ruan

Page 2: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Agenda• Motivation & selected events• Data collection and adjustment• Approach and code• Analysis results• Conclusion• Next steps

Page 3: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Motivation• We have gone through a politically

tumultuous past few years

• Domestic and Foreign

• What impact does this have on our finances?

• Goal: Figure out how different domestic and foreign political events impact two major exchanges: NASDAQ and the London Stock Exchange Group

Page 4: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Events● 2008 Presidential Election

● 2012 Presidential Election

● 2016 Super Tuesday

● Greek Financial Crisis

● Scottish Independence 2014

● BREXIT

Page 5: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

About the Data● 30 stocks from NASDAQ and 30 stocks from LSEG

■ Concatenated each exchange into two separate data frames

• Adjusted for formatting (column names, file format etc)

• Converted these data frames into clean CSV files to be used for analysis

● Adjustment of units■ Since we are using different market and timeframes, adjustments with the

prices are needed

• Currency Rate

• Inflation Rate

Page 6: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Increasing trend in CPI shows important of inflation

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 7: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Approach and Code- Inflation rate: computed using Consumer Price Index (CPI)

- Currency exchange rate: extrapolate missing data

- Difference between pre-event and post-event average stock price

- Scatter plot of price difference

- Match-paired hypothesis test on price difference

- Confidence interval, p-value, etc.

- Bar graph of daily total volume

Page 8: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Results: no statistically significant impact on US market

- Relatively narrower confidence interval

Page 9: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Results: no statistically significant impact on UK market

- Relatively wider confidence interval, indicating more volatility

Page 10: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Trading volume shows no change in investing behaviorExample: 2008 Presidential Election

Page 11: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Example 1: Scottish IndependenceUS Market- CI = [-9.78, 4.72]- CI Width = 14.50- T-value = -0.71- P-value = 0.48

UK Market- CI = [-163.18,

78.49]- CI Width = 241.67- T-value = -0.72- P-value = 0.48

Page 12: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Effect on Marketplace Visualizations

US UK

Page 13: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Example 2: 2016 Super TuesdayUS Market- CI = [-11.10,20.41]- CI Width = 31.51- T-value = 0.60- P-value = 0.55

UK Market- CI = [-101.07,

174.85]- CI Width =

275.9231968- T-value = 0.55- P-value = 0.59

Page 14: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Effect on Marketplace Visualizations

US UK

Page 15: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Drawing Conclusions• UK marketplace is relatively more

volatile than US

• Investors should not make rash decisions ➢ Decrease dumping of stocks

during a politically tumultuous time

• The prospect of shorting stocks is only viable within a very short window ➢ Timing is critical!

Page 16: Stat 3250 Final - Group 2.pptx

Next Step- Testing smaller window- Expanding sample size- Test effect from 2016

Presidential elections- Expanding to other

global markets