Stanley Hilton

8/14/2019 Stanley Hilton

1/27

Stanley Hilton Sues Bush Cabal for 9-11 Conspiracyby SURFINGTHEAPOCALYPSE.COM

(Photo: Pentagon's Paul Wolfowitz laughing at the people who believe the 9-11 Cover-Up Report)

Stanley Hilton, Bob Dole's former Chief of Staff, has launched a Federal law sui

t against top members of the Bush administration in a case alledging that Bush personally ordered 9/11 to take place. It was an operation that had been plannedfor over 35 years to gain political advantage and to push the Neo-Con agenda.

In an interview with Alex Jones, Hilton stated that he has filed a taxpayers Class Action Civil Lawsuit representing 400 members of the families of the many victims of the attacks as plaintiffs to claim that the Bush administration "violated the Constitutional Rights of the victims of 9/11".

The Suit will be launched under the Federal Fraudulant Claims Act, and under theRICO Statute for being a "corrupt entity".

Hilton claimed that the 19 hijackers were actually FBI/CIA double agents who hadbeen originally brought into the U.S. to spy on Arab groups.

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=101&contentid=1536

Stanley Hilton Sues Bush Cabal for 9-11 Conspiracy (continued)by SURFINGTHEAPOCALYPSE.COM

Another claim that Hilton made was that Al-Qaeda was created by the CIA.

Hilton has deposed many people and has gathered documentary evidence, as well aswitnesses' sworn statements from FBI agents, FBI informants, officials in the Pentagon and in the U.S. Military, and U.S. Airforce. This evidence states that there were many drills and dress rehearsals for 9/11 before it actually took place.

He claims to have incriminating documents showing the Bush personally signed theorders for the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

He stated that he has interviewed individuals of NORAD and the Airforce about th

e "5 Tripod Drills" that were taking place that morning, one of which, had as it's scenario, "planes crashing into the World Trade Center, and into the Pentagon"! [This was way better than a potentially incriminating Stand Down order.] He also stated that Dick Cheney was personally leading these Tripod drills from a situation control room the morning of 9/11.

Out of the members of the military that had been ordered to take part, most thought that the actual events of 9/11 were just part of these Tripod Drills when infact they had been no drill at all but were very real.

Hilton allegedly has a National Security Council Document clearly indicating the"Go Ahead", "This in NO Drill" order. He also believes that the 19 hijackers were set up as a "Decoy Operation".

Alex Jones chimed in at this point to state that the Mainstream Media is all owned by the same military industrial complex that was behind the attacks.


2/27

Increasingly, witnesses have stated that they will come forward and testify butonly under subpeona due to official gag orders which they are currently bound by.

Hilton believes that the "Patriot Act I, and II" were designed to prevent the kind of political dissent over the governments complicity in these events that the

very lawsuit of Hilton represents. The term "Terrorist" is now being over-broadened as evidenced by, what happened to the protesters in New York City during the RNC.

The Neo-Con's plans are to continue to launch more "terrorist" attacks as neededin order to further their plans, and more than that, to put up a smoke-screen to hide all that's already coming to light about their complicity in these events.

Next will come "forced Psychological Assessments, and forced drugging."

Hilton stated that Bush and the Neo-Cons are a "Clear and Present Danger", to us

all, through the Patriot Act and through the threats to those who would speak out which have already been made and which will be made in the future as more people come forward to testify.

Alex Jones then stated that, we must recognize this evil for the sake of all ofour freedoms. If we don't make a stand, they will have their way with us. "Heaven help us", he said.

Prison Planet

JUNE 15, 2003 SUNUpdated 12:33pm CSTPRISON PLANET.com Analysis


3/27

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................

...............................................................PRISON PLANET.com Copyright 2002-2003 Alex Jones All rights

reserved.

He was a senior advisor for Bob Dole, counsel for Bob Dole and others in the Republican Party. Hes an expert on government-sponsored terrorism and has written abook about it, throughout history. And he now has new revelations never before revealed from his depositions of witnesses involved in and around 9/11. He represents over 400 of the victims of 9/11s families and he has been given almost no attention. While some of the other groups headed by well-known PR bureaucrats, wevehad them on the show, as well, are trying to suppress this information. Joiningus is Stanley Hilton. We are honored to have you on the show Stanley.

SH: Glad to be here.

AJ: Tell us just a little bit about yourself, your lawsuit, recap what we covered last year and in the last year. Tell us whats developed with the lawsuit and th


4/27

e new revelations that you told me about on the phone.

SH: Well, we filed the lawsuit last May against Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld andseveral other of the rest of the terrorists that run the U.S. government for complicity in causing and also in aiding and abetting the 9/11 attacks, in order to promote their political agenda. And, we are in the process, you know these lawsuits, they come and they go in terms of level of activity. And most of it is do

ne, you know, in confidential, called discovery, litigation that is depositionsunder oath, battles in court to get documents. We are facing very strong resistance from the government. They are claiming national security over everything. They claim they dont want to release documents, etc. But I represent the people whowere victimized by what the government did. Im also challenging the constitutionality of the so-called USA PATRIOT Act, they call it; the anti-patriot act is what I call it. And Patriot Act I and II, with II in the wings, which the government plans to introduce this year, which will be even more severe than Patriot ActI. And this new one, Patriot Act II, they are going to give Bush the right to declare any American citizen a enemy combatant arbitrarily. And then take away yourcitizenship. This will give the government the power to literally strip any American of citizenship if Bush says youre an enemy combatant, ie: political opponen

t of the government. So anyway , we saw some very interesting documents and memoranda, including several of those advisors around Bush, namely Wolfowitz, Wormser, Feith, Perle, the rest of them. And they actually wrote these memos several months before 9/11, in which they fervently wished for a Pearl Harbor type incident to give them the shock value that would enable them to ramp through their agenda.

AJ: And this you told me last week before this was on ABC News that you have gotten some of this information through depositions and some other little tidbits that havent been disclosed. But also, you talked about how you deposed, you got the marriage certificates, the evidence, the photographs - a woman who was marriedto one of the hijackers. You talked to what you said were six or eight people who were connected to them. And then we have the news articles where the FBI gave

them homes, paid their rent, followed them around. We know Israel was involvedin similar things. Can you speak to that please?

SH: Yes, I do have a witness who was married, shes an American woman, but she wasmarried to one of the hijackers and she knew about seven of them. She met sevenof them. Essentially these Arab hijackers were double agents. That is, they were operating inside the U.S. for ten to fifteen years in cells. Some of them used the term al Qaeda, theyve used other terms. Al Qaeda is just a word. That means nothing. You could call them the Muslim Brotherhood, the Army of God, they go by all sorts of names. But what they are is a series of cells that have been aided and abetted by the U.S. Government. This woman was involved also, married to himat the time of the 1993 World Trade Center first bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing when her ex-husband actually traveled to Oklahoma City several weeks beforethe bombings. And they were involved, apparently, in that.

But what we have here is double agents. In that they nominally appear to be Arabfanatics. But one of the points that she stressed is they are really not Muslims. They are more interested in Playboy than in the Koran. I mean these people drink. They are very secular. They are not the fanatical Muslim zealots that the Bush criminals would lead us to believe is whats operating here. What they are isthey receive regular payments from the U.S. Government. They have been recruitedby the CIA, FBI, counter-intelligence, and so-forth and paid money and allowedto exchange information with U.S. government agents about various activities going on and....

AJ: Let me stop you right there Mr. Hilton. Everything you said was already backed up by mainstream reports. Youve gotten it now, in sworn testimony in depositions under oath. But something that everybody wants to ignore is that three of the


5/27

hijackers, at least, were trained at Pensacola Naval Air Station not at a localairfield - on the base, by the government, at least. Now we find out that eightof the hijackers under names we heard are still alive in the Middle East, on television doing interviews. You know, their faces, their names, same people. We have then Mohamed Atta being sent over to the Defense Language School at Monterrey. You talked to Steven Butler.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: The Colonel there, the Dean of the school. So, we know this. And then I havethe stories on infowars.com, in prisonplanet.com in the 9/11 archives, which isa great research tool for anybody, where they admit - FBI paid for their houses, FBI lived with them, Mossad lived with them. Now, youre saying double agents. And youre saying what we already had the pieces of here without your depositions,but its a great confirmation, that theyre involved in World Trade Center I in 93 and Oklahoma City. But heres the deal, the FBI cooked the bomb, trained the driver,gave the guys the detonators in the first World Trade Center. We know that. Thats in the New York Times. We know that the feds were inside planting the bombs atOklahoma City and had these Iraqis outside with McVeigh. Ive talked to police, t

he FBI. So when you say double agent, I would venture to say that these are double agents who were still alive who were just seen at the scene of the crime while the globalists militarily carry out the attacks themselves. Thats where the evidence points. But what youve proven and what the news has proven is they at leastreceived payments and training and protection and the FBI has been told not tostop these al Qaeda groups. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, the witness I was talking about, personally met Atta - two Attas - Mohamed and the younger brother. And they are alleged to be two of the ones on theairliners. You know, the thing is, these individuals are, in my view, patsies. That is, they were paid by the government. I dont believe that they themselves flewthe planes into, as I said previously, allegations are that the government has this device that we codename Cyclops that allows, from an airbase nearby, to disa

ble the pilots control of an airliners and to fly them by remote control.

AJ: Thats admitted. Its decades old. Its called Global Hawk.

SH: Yeah, Global Hawk, right. Of course, the government denied that its deployed. They say theyve got the technology but they havent deployed it.

AJ: Let me stop you. Let me stop you. This is really key, Sir. We are so honoredto have you. Ive really studied this and I want to give you.. You probably already have and I want to reiterate it for the listeners. Bush, two days after the attack at a speech in New York said that in the future we can remote control these planes and land them so this doesnt happen. And someone reached up and physically grabbed him by the arm and made him shut-up. And, if youve seen The Masters ofTerror, we have the two Associated Press articles, after you were on our show andbrought this up that you have this from inside military officers.....

SH: Yes.

AJ: Suddenly, they had a cover story and two AP articles in the New York Daily News, all in the film, where they said, Lo and behold, 8:30 in the morning, the CIA was running a drill of flying jetliners into buildings in New York and D.C. Itjust so happened at that very minute they were running this and it just so happened that NORAD stood down for an hour and half, the 58 minutes in different cases. I mean its incredible when you add all this together. Go ahead.

SH: Yeah, thats right. The official government party line is, the first line of defense is the cause and effect of science fiction doesnt exist. But thats a totallie. Anybody that works - and Ive spoken to hundreds of mechanics and maintenance


6/27

managers at United Airlines and American Airlines and several others and they all confirm that technology exists.

AJ: Well, how do drones operate? The company is in Fort Worth.

SH: Sure, sure, the question is has it been deployed. The answer is: yes, it has. I have one witness who was on the very same United aircraft from Newark, New J

ersey to San Francisco, four days before September 11th, and observed certain individuals on that plane who were then later claimed to be the hijackers. He observed them speaking with the government agents.

AJ: Is that Mr. Woods?

SH: I cant disclose names on that right now.

AJ: And then, he was threatened. I dont know if it is Woods but Woods said, he....

SH: No, its not Woods. Its someone else. Its someone else. This is a civilian.

AJ: But with Woods, the famous actor, (garbled) and this is a problem, the FBI came and said you tell anybody about this and you are going to jail.

SH: Well yes, thats right. The anti-Patriot Act I and II, as I call them, are thetools which are very similar to what happened in Nazi Germany, Hitlers enablingact after the Reichstag fire. It gave him dictatorial power. Thats the goal here.Thats the end run. This is what we have to look at here - what their purpose ultimately is. I mean this attempt to invade Iraq now, for no purpose, is coming Iguess next week or the week after, is just starting. This was planned long before 9/11. These people around Wolfowitz and so forth. I mean I went to school withWolfowitz. I was at the same university in the late 60s when he was very activewith the Israelis over there at the University of Chicago. He was pursuing a PhD

and these people have an agenda. Its not an agenda that helps the America people; its an attempt to use this country and its power, to wreck this country, in theservice of another nefarious and ulterior goal.

AJ: Now, Mr. Hilton, there is a lot to cover. Can we just go through your depositions and this is incredibly dangerous. You have incredible, amazing honor and will, and I mean this Sir. God bless you. People like you are going to save thiscountry. Your witnesses do...You know what you are doing is very, very dangerous. Im going to be honest with you, I hope you have large life insurance policies.

SH: (Laughs)

AJ: I need them too, but no, what you are really doing pierces the veil and youare on target. But there is so many of us now, its why they are on the run and weare on the march. Go down some of the key stuff youve got in depositions. I dontwant to give your whole case away..

SH: Well, as I mentioned, the individual on the aircraft that was later hijacked, four days later - same flight, same destination - Newark to San Francisco - what he observed, what others on that plane, including United flight attendants observed, were these individuals who four days later were said to be on the planethat crashed it. And theyre government controlled - and there is this term trade craft, meaning basically spying, counter spying. And one of the terms in trade craft is control. These Arabs that were alleged to have done it had controls and some of our discovery has identified some of these people. They are FBI and CIA ag

ents who...

AJ: So they had control - actual agents or case officers and they had their litt


7/27

le minion drones with them.

SH: Yeah, these people operated in cells. The cells are from six to twelve individuals. And the cells move around, for instance, from Portland, Oregon to San Diego. Its just one example. But they didnt move all six to twelve of them by chance. They were instructed to do it. They were at locations or schools or apartments, etc., that were bought here. Again, this is from a direct eyewitness. This has

been verified with marriage certificates, documents, photographs - photographswith bin Laden and his brothers.

AJ: Paid for by the U.S. Government. Thats official.

SH: Yeah.

AJ: Associated Press, Washington Post and they just kind of brush that over.

SH: See the thing is that you look back in 93 and 95, Oklahoma City, World Trade Center, and you say well Clinton was in power; whereas now its Bush. So you say well how could it be the same players here? The answer is that the shadow governme

nt transcends individual political puppets that occupy 1600 Pennsylvania. I meanit doesnt really make much difference whether its Clinton or Bush. The shadow government, as I call it, essentially is continuous. These bureaucrats that youve got there at the Pentagon, State Dept., White House, etc., they stay on. They stayon from administration to administration pursuing a certain agenda. And I thinkthis is all part of a pattern. And the latest example, manifestation was 9/11.Youve got that and the anthrax attack which happened immediately right after 9/11.

AJ: Well that turns out - the most weaponized form of anthrax ever seen, U.S. Government patented design. It is incredibly small microns, levels, coated in bentonite, sent and then Bush is on Cipro, the anthrax antibiotic on September 10th,with his cabinet. Judicial Watch tries to serve a summons to depose the press s

ecretary who admitted this and they tell them at the front gate, youll be arrested if you depose us. Did you hear about that?

SH: Yes, I did.

AJ: Stay there. I mean Clinton didnt even do that. Stanley Hilton, an amazing man, we'll be right back.

BREAK

AJ: And we will take your calls for Mr. Hilton in the next hour. Again, this guyknows what hes talking about. He has worked with some of the highest levels in the U.S. government, in the U.S. Senate. He was counsel to Bob Dole. He is a goodAmerican. He knows tyranny when he sees it; same thing with me. Again, Ive beena Republican for years but Im not this type of a Republican. I love America and the Bill of Rights. These neocons are the worst of Stalin and Hitler, rolled intoone. And Im not using those terms for effect. These are scary people. Mr. Hilton, from your experience, what types of groups of people, the shadow government, which they just announced, remember last year, that weve known about for years. And what does the shadow government want this world to be like?

SH: Basically a one-world globalist tyranny controlled by them, of course, the neocons, neo-conservatives. But they are not really conservatives; they are radicals because they are seeking a radical destruction of our way of life for the last two-hundred years. Theyre are basically introducing an alien anti-American for

m of tyranny which has more to do with old Europe and Asia than it has to do with this country. The ultimate goal, of course, is to advance their own agenda. Certainly, the extension of Israels borders from the Nile to the Euphrates as they


8/27

say the Bible mandates is certainly a major goal. No question about it. Emulation of Sharons government in Israel to turn the U.S. into sort of a super Israel, Ithink is another purpose. And if you look at whats going on now with the propaganda war - all this 9/11 exaggerations and lies and so forth by these criminals around Bush. That is certainly aimed at the agenda of territorial expansion of Israel in the Middle East - the major goal, there is no question about it.

AJ: You know thats a key motive that I havent talked enough about. We do have thetrillions of dollars of oil, the weapons sales, the $1.7 to 1.9 trillion cost ofa 5-year occupation paid into the Carlyle Group and others. The domestic policestate crackdown, the smokescreen for economic collapse while they consolidate,while they suck Enron and other companies dry. They can declare national security on investigations of that. But I would agree with you about Israel because what makes me lean more toward what youre saying is that its being one of the centralcrown jewels or the star of the crown, one of the big ones, the head piece, isthat the announcement three months ago by Reuters, by Israel, that the government is going to let us kill American citizens in America. No judge, no jury, no nothing, theyre just going to kill us. And now at Janes weapons, this is mainstream,you know the big world weapons tracker, came out about Israel and others, so di

d the Times of London, with race specific viruses and bacteria to kill other races other than themselves. That is the ultimate of Hitlerian-type activities.

SH: Well, the term that has been used is Zionazis, I think its an apt term - Zionazis. And I think its ironic because the Nazis based their theory on the Protocolsof the Elders of Zion, which are alleged to have been shaped by Czar claiming the Jews wanted world conflict. Now weve got the complete reverse, where the current Zionazis of Israel and their friends here in the Bush administration and elsewhere are emulating Hitler. Its come full circle. Essentially it is the same thing, whether you call them Jews or non-Jews. The point is its the same ideology - tyranny....

AJ: Yeah, it could be Chinese, you know you said the Asian model. Its just old fa

shion, Egyptian, Babylonian, ancient tyranny.

SH: Yeah, Hitler used the word Jew. Today the word we are using terrorist. Thisterm terrorist can apply to anybody. As I said, they are attempting to legalizeit just as Hitler had the 1935 Nuremberg laws that outlawed the Jews. Well, nowthey are trying to come out with an anti-patriot laws to outlaw any kind of dissent and to call you a terrorist if you attack Bush or these criminals around him- these alien criminals. And I think the agenda is clear - it is to turn the American people into Palestinian slaves. I mean thats the way it seems to me - justas the Israelis are treating the Palestinians there as sub-humans....

AJ: And then to legitimize that, they founded Hamas, which is now admitted. Wellbe right back, stay with us.

BREAK

AJ: Whether its Adolf Hitler or Saddam Hussein, the globalists, the New World Order is funded and trained them to bring you the crises, so they can offer their solution: world government. We are talking to Stanley Hilton. He is the lawyer for over 400 of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing the government, not justfor prior knowledge, but for complicity. He now, on recap, has the evidence fromdepositions, government agents, you name it, wives of supposed hijackers, thatthey were paid, funded, housed, protected by the U.S. government. Thats all comeout in mainstream news - but a piece here and a piece there: Oh, the FBI, in a strange twist, owned the houses that the hijackers lived in and paid them. In anot

her twist, there were trained at a secret military program at Pensacola. On and on and on. The LA Times, before the attacks, Bush gives $134 million to the Taliban. Theyre in business together, the bin Ladens are in satellites and oil and the


9/27

y just bought, through the Carlyle Group, Universal Studios. And they are buyingup radio networks and TV. Weve got all this happening and when you add it all together.... Mr. Hilton, have you heard them talk about how torture is good? And as if thats not enough of terrorist suspects, now they want to torture terrorist suspects children but the Patriot Act, in Section 802, says that any action that endangers human life and is a violation of any federal or state law. As a lawyer,as Bob Doles former chief counsel, what does that mean when the definition is an

y action that endangers human life, thats a violation of federal or state law? This isnt just going to be the Arabs that get tortured, is it?

SH: No, its just a blank check for the government to completely destroy democracyand torture any dissenter. You know, Alan Dershowitz, the so-called professor of law at Harvard, which is my alma mater, at Harvard University Law School. Hes the one who is coming out with calling for torture. I believe he testified beforea Senate Committee a few weeks ago...

AJ: Stick needles under their fingers..

SH: Yeah. Well, you know, him and his book of chutzpah and elsewhere, there is a

nother Israeli firster, dual loyalist. But, I dont know if I should use the termdual loyalist; I think rather Israeli loyalist. I mean these are the people behi

nd this. They use this....

AJ: Well, it is bazaar, it was Abrams, on the Abrams Report, on MSNBC, said lets torture peoples children. Im sorry, torturing children is wrong. We are seeing thisunified Nazi-like, weird race thing.

SH: Yeah. Well, I hope this will backfire on them because this is outrageous. Itsan attempt to, theres a word in Hebrew called Goyim, which means non-Jews, it means cattle. I think that summarizes it all. You know, you torture the cattle. What difference does it make? Theyre not the master race so you cant have first class citizenship in Israel unless you are born from a Jewish mother. Now if thats no

t racism, you tell me what it is. These are the people we are dying for. I meanthats the law of Israel. You can be born in Milwaukee and as long as your motheris Jewish, you can become an Israeli citizen. But if you are born in Jerusalem and you dont have a Jewish mother, you cant. But you tell me if thats not racist.

AJ: Israel has got a big problem because the left-wing has woken up to the incredible racism we are dealing with here. And whether its Hitler or Jiang Zemin or Israel involved in all this, its wrong. Now, and when they say they are going to come in here and kill American citizens with no trial, if it was Russians doing that, would we put up with it?

SH: Well, Russia is our friend now. Bush is cozying up to Putin now. I guess Chechnya, genocide Chechnya is okay because there are terrorists there. Why are these people suddenly our friends? I thought the whole cold war for 50 years....

AJ: And by the way, Putin got his war, he was caught blowing up apartment buildings. Thats mainstream news, blaming it on the Chechens.

SH: --and theatres. Putin is just another version of the Russian Czars and the commissars, and so on. These are people who are being presented as friends and Bush is saying he is looking into this fellows eyes and seeing a great man. Putin is an ex-KGB person, what do you expect from him? These people are being presented as models for this government; these are the individuals calling for torture who are supposed to be leading this country.

AJ: Totally sick. Well come back and take calls and recap some of the top news.

BREAK


10/27

AJ: We are talking to Stanley Hilton, chief counsel to Bob Dole, one of the architects of the Strategic Petroleum Initiative, to get that set up. And, of course, he is a Harvard graduate, he represents 400 of the victims families, accordingto press reports - over 400 of the victims families of 9/11. And he isnt chargingprior knowledge. He has the evidence, hes done the depositions on the facts, ladies and gentleman. Confirmed by news articles that already came out, he just want

ed to document it for himself, that the FBI and CIA handles and controls radicalIslam. Yitzhak Rabin, right before he was assassinated by Mossad, was a good man for telling the truth, said, I apologize. He said it at Tel Aviv University, theJerusalem Post reported, for the fact that Israel founded Hamas to destabilizethe region so there could never be a true peace. So, whether its Bush or the Communist Chinese or the radical Israelis, these globalists need crises, they want war, they want slavery, they want this to happen and its happening - whether youreBush or Ariel Sharon, they are all together in this New World Order. And when they start talking about torturing terrorist suspects, children, and assassinatingAmericans, thats when I come out and say no.

I know weve got Andy and Jackie and Gordon and Dan, theyve all been holding wantin

g to talk to you. Any other key depositions youve done, not just with military officers or witnesses of the feds protecting the hijackers on planes and training

them or people inside the airlines with the Global Hawk on these aircraft, all of this, break it down. Any other key smoking gun pieces of evidence and wheres your lawsuit going. I read in the press, the government is declaring national security on that and on the fire fighter tapes, that recorded bombs going off. Theyfirst said all the tapes malfunctioned. It turns out they were all there, grabbed by Bush. Could you break all this down for us. Any other key areas?

SH: You know there is a lot of this that I cant really talk about on the air forobvious reasons. But I think the evidence is building as we are going to eventually get it out to the light of day in public trial - which we hope to bring nextyear, here in the federal court. Also, its part of larger agenda, but whats reall

y going is we hope to examine the constitutionality of this anti-patriot act because its clearly unconstitutional. The Eighth Amendment says you cant use cruel orunusual punishment. But Dershowitz and his pals, and his friends around Bush, of course, dont think that means a damn thing. And they want to bring about a lawless society under the guise of laws. And its really largely political but I thinkthe evidence will show that these criminals are not only going to be removed from power but brought to justice for their crimes, including mass murder and attempting to destroy this countrys democracy.

AJ: Well, I would say our constitutional republic. Mr. Hilton, I would add to that that across the board here, you read Patriot Act II. And Ive written an analysis of it, on infowars.com. I mean it says they can grab you for any reason not even knowing if you aided a terrorist. Grab you - not ever telling when they grabbed you - you are a missing person. And then its got a subsection on secret executions.

SH: Yeah, this sounds like something out of a bad science fiction novel. But, throughout history, totalitarian regimes abuse terror as they instrument a state policy and thats what we have today. Its just a continuation of history. I mean theczars in Russian used it, the Nazis used it, the communists used it. Its nothingnew. This is just a new guise. They are bringing about selective terror. I would suspect that they will try something again, maybe not quite as spectacular as9/11 but certainly something of that nature to try again to galvanize, whats called GSR, galvanic skin response, to get the people scared to death so they will give up more and more of their rights. But its all an illusion. What we need to do

is get rid of these criminals, bring them to justice, have them arrested undera real tribunal and put them on trial for their crimes against not only the people, but their crimes against humanity.


11/27

AJ: Well, its amazing. You know the world is getting wise to this. The majority of people in Europe and Ive read the polls, are saying the globalists carried 9/11out.

SH: Oh yeah.

AJ: So wheres your suit going? I mean how are they trying to block it using national security?

SH: By refusing to give us documents that we have subpoenaed, documents that wehave demanded by the regular court processes, by claiming that there is a national security override. They have also attempted to bribe several of the plaintiffs. One of the fellows I used to work with in the U.S. Senate, named Ken Feinberg, hes in charge of handing out what I call sugar-coated bribes. That is monetaryawards to any of the victims of 9/11 and their families who will drop their suits or waive their right to sue. And, in fact, some of them have brought suit against Ken. I know the guy personally because I used to work with him on the SenateJudiciary Committee. And thats one of the things they try to do. But as far as m

y suit is concerned, they are trying to raise this blanket of national securityand so a lot of it is involved in the litigation process and so forth. They canclaim to hide everything, to hide what they are doing. Thats just a word. It means nothing - national security - what does that mean? Especially when we are accusing these very individuals of sabotaging the national security of this countryto pursue their own political objective.

AJ: Well, the new Patriot Act gets rid of almost all civil rights suits and court orders and gives them total immunity. Just like Bush, in Homeland Security, gave vaccine makers immunity for autism class action suits. Youre right, its criminals giving themselves immunity.

SH: Thats right. Well, of course, you know in Nazi Germany you cant sue Hitler. Di

d anybody try to sue Hitler? No, he got immunity, too. And the same is true of the communists or czarist Russia, Mao Tse-tung in China, what have you, you cannot enforce your rights unless you can bring these criminals to justice in a courtof law. And they are trying to take away that right - not only in that way butin many other ways. They are trying to attack so-called trial lawyers - totally take away peoples rights, to con them into believing that if you just blindly follow Bush, make Bush a god, and it is really very frightening.

AJ: What did you think - because I had Judicial Watch on - Judicial Watch is suing Bush for the workers there at the post office who wouldnt get treatment even after the anthrax attacks were going. It turns out Bush and his cabinet were on Cipro. Judical Watch twice tried to serve papers to the White House press secretary who admitted in the press conference October 10th, 2001, that they were all on Cipro. And they tried to deliver this subpoena for the deposition and they said well arrest you. This was in the news, under the Patriot Act, if you drop thatsubpoena. Now Clinton would accept subpoenas. Now they are threatening to arrestpeople for terrorism if they give somebody a subpoena.

SH: Well, its absurd but its like the situation in the Albany, New York mall wherethey arrested a guy for wearing a peace t-shirt. We are clearly losing civil liberties here. Its just really awful. The way you do that, you undermine like a termite, you undermine and destroy the foundation of peoples freedom. I have a client here in San Francisco who was fired by Neiman Marcus a couple of weeks ago because he was distributing some of your literature, Alex, like your videotapes and some of those deception dollars - that has Bushs face as basically a war crimin

al and as a big brother. And these people arrested him, they put him in handcuffs, they beat him up, they escorted him out of there and they fired him. And theysaid the country is in war.


12/27

AJ: By the way, he is a listener of this show, Abel Ash (?). When the security guy walked him in - he was doing this during his lunch break which everybody wasdoing. And everybody was giving stuff out during lunch break. And they said to him, you are not allowed to do this. You are not allowed to speak out. We are atwar, you cant do that. And then they fired him. So it shows the mindset, the insane mindset.

SH: Yeah, well its pretty much like the analogy of termites. The criminals, whatthey are doing is they are sending out the termites to undermine the foundationof the country. Just as with termites, you can think there is a brilliant housethere that is a house ready to collapse because of the rot inside. Thats whats happening here in this country - its rotting away and these termites are conning average citizens and security guards, mall guards to go out against people and theyare saying put an American flag, bumper sticker, on and that makes you a patriot. Meanwhile you are destroying the very principles the flag is supposed to represent.

AJ: There you go. The listeners are very patient. Can we take some calls?

SH: Sure.

AJ: Andy in Ohio, and then Jackie, Gordan, Dan and Kevin. Go ahead Andy.

Andy: Hey Alex, its good to talk to you.

AJ: You bet. You are on the air with our guest.

Andy: Im really pleased to talk to you, Mr. Hilton.

SH: Thank you.

Andy: And I wanted to ask you, do you think that the, on September 11th, were there hijackers on those planes or not?

SH: You know, thats hard to say since weve never seen, from the legal point of view, the bodies. There have never been autopsies. They have never identified bodies.

AJ: There was a passport found in the ruble, uncharred. Its turns out eight of the nineteen are still alive. Its clear they are patsies, as he said, just seen oncamera. We know that. What he is focusing on is: who paid their rent? The FBI. Who protected them? Who told FBI not to stop them? The FBI, the CIA, W199I, Bush.Is that what you are saying Mr. Hilton? You could prove they worked for the U.S. government.

SH: Oh yes, they were on the government payroll. There is no question, as I saidearlier, double agents. In some cases, triple agents. But, the point is that what we have here is a situation where, in my opinion, some of those alleged nineteen were on the plane, some were not. The person who used to be married to my witness, for example, we have some evidence to believe that he is still alive, that he has contacted her. And so how could he be dead in a crash when he is contacting her now? I mean, this is the kind of stuff we are dealing with now. These are individuals who were groomed by the U.S. government and they were protected.

AJ: And you said you have depositions that they were involved in Oklahoma City and World Trade I.

SH: Yeah, that they took trips out there shortly before the April 19th, 1995 bombing, etc., etc. Even the date there, Hitlers birthday being April 20th, you know


13/27

that was all, of course, it cant be anti-Semitism because Hitler is the anti-Semite. So that....

AJ: So they are trying to blame it on the right-wing using Islamic proxies. Nowwe see the story being circulated that the real right-wing that is fighting theNew World Order is connected to Saddam. And why would Clinton, after these guyswere arrested by good FBI, order their release and why wouldnt the feds release t

he surveillance camera footage of them bombing the building? Correct, Stanley?

SH: Oh yes, yes.

(under fade-out music)AJ: So surely, government operatives being protected and later being linked up with the American people to sic homeland security on, lets face it, white people,to get you trained to accept it, to get the Arabs, now its for everybody.

BREAK

AJ: Jackie in Oklahoma, you are on the air with the attorney suing George Bush f

or complicit action in 9/11, which is totally documented. A ten-year old could figure that out if we could just get the American people to face the facts. Jackie, go ahead.

Jackie: Hi Alex, we love you. I called in to find that you had a guest speaker.

AJ: I know youve been holding. Do you have any comments or questions for our guest?

Jackie: God bless you, Mr. Hilton, for your efforts. My concern is with the Powers that Be having as much power and control as they do, if we are going to be able to actually get into control of the crisis that is predicted that might happen. And my question for you Alex, is there is a deterrent of whats going on, reall

y, and it could be this planet that is headed this way.

AJ: Well, let me try to boil down what you are saying. The globalists, as Stanley said earlier are going to blow more stuff up to legitimize their war. We criticize it, point out how its wrong. They go weve got to do this to protect you.My jobis protecting the American people, Bush has said over and over again. They blow more stuff up. Hes poses as our savior. National talk show hosts out there, Michael Savage, has said that anyone who criticizes the government can be put in the forced labor camp. Hes now on national TV, MSNBC, there on the Nazi channel, sameplace where Abrams says to torture kids. Hes on there saying put us in forced labor camps. So they are setting up this paradigm. Thats why its so important to expose them, the globalists, for being involved in 9/11 and that neutralizes them. Mr. Hilton, any comment.

SH: Well yeah, there is no question what she mentions that they have so much power and all this. Well, all these tyrannical governments put on this shield of power.

AJ: They always fall because of their own nature.

SH: Yeah, look at Russia and they had the communist tyranny but it fell eventually because people were sick of it. If its wrong from the inside, like the termiteanalogy again, the structure will collapse. It could be a mansion, it could bea fortress, but if youll chip away at it, the underlying population realizes whatthis fraudulent deception is, eventually it will collapse from within. It will

implode. As Lincoln would say, its an implosion.

Jackie: But the obvious deterrent, the possibility, I know Alex doesnt want to ta


14/27

lk about it, of this planet headed this way.

AJ: Thats a total diversion, total government...

SH: Its what?

AJ: Just dont worry about it. I appreciate the call Jackie. My goodness, its just

the government controls the fake conspiracy shows and they talk about kooky stuff. Then everybody picks it up and goes with all that. And then it diverts everybody. Let me tell you what the big thing the globalists are worried about. The people getting advance technology, the people getting life extension, sovereign nations having their own sovereignty, and the global empire losing control. Thats why they are racing to do this. Lets go to Gordon. Gordon, where are you calling from tonight?

Gordon: Im calling from Toronto.

AJ: Welcome, from Canada, go ahead.

Gordon: Hi, I really appreciate your show and Hi Mr. Hilton.

SH: Hello

Gordon: The first time I heard about you was at the Washington protest in October. I went there to attend and I was given a pamphlet where I discovered that youwere representing family members. And so I really appreciate your work and yourpatriotism.

AJ: Almost a total news blackout and he represents more families than anybody else.

Gordon: Right. Actually Alex, for you, I have something interesting. A couple of

weeks ago, I dont know the man, but I came across him. His name is Rocco Galati.He was the lawyer for Delmart Vreeland and it was in a conference at the University of Toronto. And he mentioned his name, so I waited until after the conference to speak to him. And, I approached him and asked him if he was Rocco Galati and he said yes. And I asked him what had happened to Delmart Vreeland. And, he drew closer and whispered that, Hes dead. I speculated that he was killed in Augustand he said that he had been killed September the 4th of 2002.

AJ: Now wait, youre saying his lawyer said this?

Gordon: Yes, yes, indeed.

AJ: Did Mike Ruppert write about this?

Gordon: Not yet. Not that Ive seen.

AJ: Well I dont know if thats a true story. Were you familiar with the Vreeland story, Mr. Hilton?

SH: No. No Im not.

AJ: Well hes this guy who did pass the jail guards and he was Naval Intelligence.He was in jail, fleeing the U.S. government up in Canada.

SH: Oh, wait a minute. I think I know now. I actually do know who it is.

AJ: Yeah, he gave them the letter, saying that the World Trade Center is going to get knocked down. That was confirmed. And then this caller from Toronto is say


15/27

ing that hes dead. I dont know if thats the case. Ill have to find out.

SH: I know who it is but I dont know if hes alive or not. I dont know.

Gordon: Well, I mean, I think Galati is a good man. I dont think he is lying. Hemay... Thats what he may believe right now.

AJ: Why would he whisper that? Well try to find out what happened. Ill make some calls. Okay? I dont like to speculate. Ill have to stay with what we can prove.

Gordon: Absolutely, I just want to mention that the next day was when he was duefor court for his trial.

SH: This is the fellow who was ONI, Office of Naval Intelligence?

AJ: Yes. ONI, right.

Gordon: The next day, he was due in court.

AJ: Alright, thanks for the call. We dont know if that

s true. I

ll have to check this stuff out. There is an endless sea of real news. Why speculate? Well be right b

ack with more calls for our guest.

BREAK

AJ: Our guest is Stanley Hilton. We are so honored to have him on our show with incredible revelations tonight. Amazing courage. If more of us had it, we could save this country. There is a human cycle of tyranny and this one is waxingprobably worse than ever seen in world history. We must defeat it. Lets talk to Dan in New York. You are on the air with Stanley Hilton. Go ahead Dan.

Dan: Hi, glad to talk to you both. Ive from (garbled) New York, the hometown of

your good friend, Bill OReilly actually. I watched the Road to Tyranny and Ive been (garbled) quite often lately. And ever since 9/11, I have been a patriot andI love this country so much. And when I see what Bush has been doing, its makingme sick. I mean, I m eighteen years old and I know kids in my school who just dont care about this kind of stuff. They dont see the big major..

AJ: They are going to care when they get drafted to serve in the Homeland Armyin the 63 countries, 62 countries they want to hit. Mr. Hilton?

SH: Yes, theyll care if they get an M-16, and khaki pants and a uniform to go out and fight for senseless wars in Iraq, Israel or whatever - or something that has nothing to do with American security.

Dan: Right, I fully agree with you. What I really wanted to call about, in (garbled) this past Sunday, I wrote a paper and I was kind of anti-war. I basically said that the Gulf War is about oil and this is the whole entire motive behindthe war and they just kind of shut me out. I mean they were nice; (garbled) but they were pretty biased.

AJ: Oh yeah, some public schools in the East, there have been several articles,they say pro-peace papers are hurting the children or military peoples feelings,so those wont be allowed now.

SH: Well, you know, as far is the war is concerned, there was a Congressman upthere near northern Virginia that was attacked by the mainstream media just a fe

w days ago because he said this war is about Israel. And he, of course, was immediately accused of being anti-Semitic, etc., etc., blah, blah, blah. And, so you know, not only are you accused of being a terrorist, of being anti-government


16/27

but you are accused of being an anti-Semite if you just exercise your freedom of speech about whats going on.

AJ: Again, Stanley Hilton, former chief counsel for Bob Dole. And I think he pointed it out well. You oppose the tyranny of communist Russia, the tyranny ofAdolf Hitler, the tyranny of Bush, the tyranny of Israel, the tyranny of Iraq, any of these countries. But you are right, you are not even supposed to just cri

ticize and Im angry at Israel saying that they are going to assassinate Americancitizens without a trial here in America. I mean wed be mad if the Chinese saidtheyd do that. Wed be mad if the Mexican troops, which are doing that by the way,theyve got bounties on Border Patrols heads. But Israel can do it and it is wrong. And that is happening and I agree we should speak out against it. And I think the left wing should get more focused, not on making the UN the big authoritybecause its all controlled as well, but pointing out this whole, as you said, this shadow world government, this world fascist state, is using these organs. Anything else, Dan?

Dan: I just wanted to say that, I mean, I feel really bad that Im kind of like,my generation they just dont care about it.

SH: Apathetic, yeah, apathetic.

Dan: Its really (garbled)

AJ: Well, look it was 5% that won the Revolutionary War in 1776. It was 2% that started it, Sir. So, believe me, our numbers - Stanley wouldnt you say that our numbers are probably (crosstalk)

SH: Yeah, but minorities have always wielded at the cutting edge of history, you know. Its always been a minority. Even if you look at the Bolshevik or the howthe Nazis started out with (garbled) people who were revolutionary people who were very few, who were adamantly against the British tyranny. Thats true, minori

ties have always wielded the cutting edge of history.

AJ: Yeah, so you dont want, I dont mean to be mean, but somebody watching American Idol drooling, drinking whiskey or snorting cocaine - those poor sad people, weare trying to protect their rights and theyll never thank us. But it doesnt matter. Were protecting our family and our children. Thanks for the call Dan.

Dan: No problem.

AJ: Yeah, I mean people start talking about torturing kids, I come out againstthem. Its that simple.

SH: Its being done in the Middle East everyday now. You know the Palestinians are being tortured and murdered everyday. So its nothing new.

AJ: Ive seen the video of them shooting 5-year old kids and its wrong. And thenyou find out that Israel founded Hamas, thats Yitzhak Rabin, thats not me. Its United Press International. Lets talk to Kevin in Pennsylvania. Kevin youre on theair, go ahead.

Kevin: Good evening, Alex. And Id like to say hi to your guest and Id also liketo say to the gentleman that called right before me that I am part of your generation. Im 23 years old and I see it. Alex, I havent be able to able to get yourvideo yet, the Road to Tyranny, but guess what? Ive found a way to hook my short wave radio into my stereo. Just snap off the back of it and hooked the computer

wire to the two terminals of the speaker and then hook it into the in-jacks of the tape deck and it tapes it in stereo, even though the radio only broadcasts/comes out mono. So I can start giving out your programs.


17/27

AJ: That is a great thing to do. You also want to call a local station and getthem to (crosstalk)

Kevin: Im going to do better, Im going to send tapes of it to the local radio stations, of your programs. You know, and figure out which ones that I tape are the most compelling. I also would like to say I saw a little advertisement on the

Weather Channel for Homeland Security. 1-800-BE-READY And I called that up and I played them and I played the number that you call for the makers for the mark of the beast, Applied Digital. I played them your commercial.

SH: I just want to say something about the so-called Homeland, I call it Homeland Insecurity.

Kevin: I call it the Department of the New World Order.

AJ: Yeah, its a Nazi term.

SH: Yeah, Homeland Insecurity, the purpose is to make Americans insecure not se

cure. Let me just tell you this, briefly, the lady thats a witness that was married to one of the hijackers, she has been interviewed by the FBI thirty times an

d has told them various things which they have then used for this orange alert,red alert. She has actually shown me how theyve used some things that were totally made up. And so this is a complete fraud. This is a complete fraud.Kevin: Nothing happened, I think that was because they knew people were like, kind of on edge.

AJ: Thats so when they blow stuff up, they go, See we warned you. Now when theresan orange alert, we are going to lock the cities down. Watch the (crosstalk)

Kevin: I heard about it on the radio station, in my area...

AJ: Let me tell you this. Under a red alert, your children will be taken in school to a FEMA center, you wont be allowed to get them. Go ahead.

Kevin: Thats what they were saying on, there is a school around here. They weregoing, If there are terrorists, well, weve got to keep food and supplies. And they are saying that they might not let you get your kids.

SH: Let me just tell you, one of the people weve interviewed for the case is a former top official at FEMA, who was there during the Reagan Administration and the first Bush Administration. And, again, FEMA being one of the agencies that would swing into action in the event of an emergency would have blueprints for establishing martial law in this country.

AJ: Sir? Mr. Hilton? Mr Hilton? Hold on. We posted mainstream news articles last week where they admit giant one-million man concentration camps with, this is Rocky Mountain News, with incinerators, mass graves already ready.

Kevin: They are taking some tips from Hitler, huh?

AJ: Tell me. Mr. Hilton, Im not joking, Im serious.

SH: I believe it. I believe it. Yeah, these people are dangerous, theyre criminals.

Kevin: (Crosstalk) anti-Christ, do you think might try (garbled).

AJ: No, sir, I dont get into all those (crosstalk)


18/27

Kevin: I know, when are you going to be on Coast to Coast? I emailed them to get you on.

AJ: Well, I appreciate it.

Kevin: I do all I can to fight the New World Order. I am.

AJ: Alright, bro. Thanks for the call. I just know - the poor folks in Rwanda, when the UN was killing them, thought that it was the anti-Christ and they were about to get raptured out. It didnt happen. Same thing with Hitler, folks, God helps those who help themselves. I believe in God. Im a Christian. But I believe weve got these phony churches, have been infiltrated by the government, aretelling you to lay down. And weve got to say no to that.

SH: The other thing I want to say about the rapture, eschatology and so on, isthat a lot of these right-wing churches support Israel because they feel that the Bible gives them the right to extend to the Nile and Euphrates and beyond. And its just another propaganda ploy to support our going out there and dying for Israel - because the Bible says so. Now, I dont think, I mean this idea that Jesu

s will come with a rapture tomorrow if we support Israel today, weve got Armageddon around the corner, I mean this is nonsense. This is just a complete sham. B

ut, why do all the right-wing evangelical Christians support this state which (crosstalk)

AJ: Hold on, theyre not right-wing; theyre neocons.

SH: Well, no, theyre cons, as in con artists. But I mean, the point is that whydo you support a country that is anti-Christian? I mean, its not only anti-Christian but it has attempted to shutdown Christmas, take away Christmas trees, etc., etc., you know, national holidays, take away crosses in cities. I mean thisis what we are fighting for.

AJ: Absolutely and thats why Yitzhak Rabin was killed because he wouldnt go alongwith it. And I would add to that that its this global body. Its the large central banks that are made up of the Bushes, the Dutch, the British - its all connected. Lets take some more calls. Up next is, only two more calls and weve got to let our guest go, Rich in Maryland, go ahead, you are on the air.

Rich: Hey, you guys are right on target tonight. And, Stanley, you are right about the term dual loyalist is a little generous. They are Israeli firsters and these zionists are running the show. And, Alex, you are right that they are going after the Arabs now but next, next its going to be guess what? The white people.

SH: Yeah, well the Arabs are not really Muslim fanatics as was presented, as Isaid earlier, the eye witness, these people are more interested in Playboy thanin the Koran.

AJ: Well, let me just say this. I dont come up with this comment out of nowhere. I look at the FBI training manuals, I have them on tape, I have them on videoand when I say white people, I want racist white America that goes, oh yeah Bushkilled them Arabs. Its acceptable to have radio promos where he goes, Look at thecamels run, look at them ragheads. Thats on national radio. That type of racismis acceptable and I think its disgusting. And then, theyll come back - well I want white America to know that what FEMA is creating and what they are training police is: Christians, gun owners, home schoolers, those who believe in the second coming of Christ - I have it in my film, their documents, their news articles,

them on video. I want people to know that this Homeland Security deal that they want to merge and blame on the right-wing, the real right-wing, not the neocons, with Oklahoma City, connecting the two Iraqis. Mr. Stanley Hilton interviewe


19/27

d government officials, has the depositions, knows that these Muslims that werehired were there at World Trade Center I, II and Oklahoma City. Thats the frame-up. So, thats what they are doing. Now, go ahead Rich.

Rich: Yeah, and I think in the end, you know, what we are looking at here, thisthings going to be, you know theyve got up to what 500,000 foreign troops they are planning to put here?

AJ: Let me tell Mr. Hilton about that. Hes a very intelligent man and he has written books on this subject, again Bob Doles chief counsel, but I have AP, Reuters, CVC, Washington Post - this sounds so crazy, this is not my opinion. Just like the incinerators or torturing kids, I mean they are saying all this. It is in my film, Road to Tyranny and Masters of Terror, both of them, where they say - they have signed deals to bring Dutch, Check Republic, Mexican, Canadian, British,and yes Israeli, all of these people here. Ive been to training ops where they train to put us in camps. They have signed the deals to bring them in to deal with American terrorists. Mr. Hilton, have you heard about that?

SH: Yes, I have. I think, Ive heard from the person that I mentioned before tha

t was from FEMA. There is definitely an agenda here. I mean this is somethingthat is truly I think of world historical significance with whats down the line here. I mean this is not a minor thing. This is not about finding who caused 9/11, we know who did, hes sitting at 1600 Pennsylvania. Thats where he is. I mean, we know who did it. But this is all about this larger entity, what they are trying to do. This is - if you look again from the historical perspective, therehave been others in history who had similar goals. This one (garbled) has hightechnology and they are pulling the wool over Americans eyes with the media axe,the mass media axe as they call them.

AJ: And NAFTA and GATT has been their economic warfare tool to get everybody economically dependent.

SH: Oh yeah, I think the attempt - the Bush depression is intentional. Its notnegligent. I think competence - I dont think its negligence; I think its intentional to wreck this countrys economy in order to make the people more dependent, more scared, more insecure. The Department of Homeland Insecurity will extend economic insecurity.

AJ: And they are going to have national service in the new bill. There is a new bill for compulsory national service and you will all get jobs from the government. Theyve even said it. I watched the Homeland Security meeting with Ridge on C-span and he said it. He said they are going to have troops in the factories.

Rich: Now, Alex, what they are going to do. They are going to do the man behind the screen thing. You know what I mean? The Wizard of Oz thing? They are going to have, lets say, a half a million, 500,000 foreign troops. Okay. Youve got285 million people, most of them are armed.

AJ: The problem is we are all balkanized fighting with each other but its true- a motivated minority of us can defeat this. Thanks for the call. But it takes telling the truth and getting involved. One last call for our guest, StanleyHilton, who I really want to thank for coming on the show. Rhonda, in Missouri,youre on the air, go ahead.

Rhonda: Evening, Gentleman. Thank you guys for all your work. That was Congressman Moran that....

SH: Right


20/27

Rhonda: made that statement. He has since apologized for it.

SH: Of course, under pressure from Bush.

Rhonda: Yeah.

AJ: Whose father was arrested for funding the Nazis, running almost all of thei

r operations. Again.

Rhonda: You know this Rapture cult kind of fits in good with the Fatherland Security because when people start disappearing, they can just blame it on the rapture. We cant find them; I dont know where they are. God must have took them.

SH: In South America, its called desaparedetos (sp), which means it disappeared.You have this in Chile and Argentina, etc. - hundreds of thousands of people d

isappeared. Their families go marching around the central square on Saturday afternoons. I mean thats what you are going to be seeing here pretty soon - peoplethat have disappeared. I they are going to wonder where did they go? And thatsthe goal here - to spread terror, to make you feel that unless you tow the line

you are going to be picked up next. Thats the ultimate form of power.

AJ: And if you give in to that they win. Weve got to stand up like Paul Revereand say uh-uh baby.

Rhonda: What I want to ask you is, in deposing these military, hows the militaryfeeling about whats happened?

SH: A lot of the military are very angry about whats happened. They dont like what they are seeing. The military, however, literally there is no democracy in the military. There is no freedom of speech because you are basically a foot soldier, literally, in the army so you are the last person that is supposed to dissent. Many of them are threatened - they are threatened with the court-martials,

they are not allowed to express freedom of speech. I wish several would resignin protest to make the point. There was a fellow who resigned from the government ....

AJ: Ambassador

SH: Yeah, right the ambassador, to make the point. But the military is a little different in that.....

AJ: The Washington Times reported, the lowest morale ever, ever at the Pentagon.

Rhonda: I know I spent fourteen years in the service. I know if you dont speak their language, youve got to keep your mouth shut or they can throw you in the brig.

AJ: Rhonda, we are almost out of time. I want to thank you for the call.

Rhonda: Okay.

AJ: Mr. Hilton, thanks for coming on. Thanks for all your work. As the suit develops, can we have you back on?

SH: Sure, sure, Ill keep you posted. And we hope that we will be able to bringthese criminals to justice eventually because they ought to be not in a civil la

wsuit but in a criminal court in the docket. And Im hoping that eventually theywill all be brought down, all of them (crosstalk).


21/27

AJ: Youre right, its the minority on the cutting edge of history. You are on that cutting edge. If we dont speak up now, our children wont have any future. Willthey? We are out of time with Stanley Hilton. Ill be right back, stay with us.You can listren to the MP3 audio of this interview at http://www.prisonplanet.com/hilton_03_11_03.mp3http://www.prisonplanet.com/jones_report_031403_hilton.html

Stanley Hilton Lawsuitby Stanley HiltonTAXPAYERS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

v.

GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DICK CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT; GEORGE TENET, CIA DIRECTOR; ROBERT MUELLER, FBI DIRECTOR; CONDOLEEZA RICE, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL; UNITED STATES OF AMERI

CA , ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Second Amended Complaint For Damages, Injunction And Declaratory ReliefJURY TRIAL DEMANDED

First Cause Of Action: Taxpayer Suit Under The Constitution.1. Plaintiffs are all taxpayers of the united states of America, except for plaintiff "United StatesGovernment" ("USG"), which is named as a plaintiff because 31 us code ? 3730(b)states that an action under the Federal Fraudulent Claims Act must be brought in the name of the US government. Plaintiffs also aver that they bring this action in the name of all victims of defendants' schemes as stated in this action, including soldiers and others forced to go to Iraq by defendants and risk and losetheir lives and limbs.

2. Plaintiffs are suing only those defendants named in the caption of this amended complaint.

3. This is an actual case and controversy and is not "Political" case. In particular, the second cause of action for violation of 31 US Code sec. 3729 is brought under 31 US CODE ? 3730 (b), which states that private citizens have rights tobring such an action against Bush et al. In the name of the "united states government," to recover funds of which the USG has been defrauded by defendants, viafalse claims plaintiffs accuse defendants of violating federal laws and abusingpowers, i.e. committing illegal acts, not of political decisions. The acts areministerial, not discretionary. Defendants violated clearly established laws andrights of plaintiffs, such as first amendment rights of free speech and 4th amendment rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and cannot claim"qualified immunity." Though they are high federal officeholders, defendants arenot immune from suit. A sitting president can be sued for violating clearly established laws in office.

4. Plaintiffs demand a jury trial.

5. The statute of limitations does not bar this action.

6. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment and opinion declaring the USA patriotacts I and II unconstitutional, for violating plaintiffs' clearly established constitutional rights under the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th , 8th and 9th and 14th ame

ndments to the US constitution, we ask the court to enjoin enforcement of the USA Patriot Acts I and II accordingly.


22/27

7. Plaintiffs also ask the court to render a declaratory judgment declaring themilitary action in Iraq to be unconstitutional.

8. There is a need for an injunction because defendants continue to squander taxpayers' money and there is reason to believe defendants plan further military adventures which would drain the treasury, deprive plaintiffs of federal funds andtax money.

9. Defendants all have offices in San Francisco, CA and operate here.

10. Jurisdiction over ths case is conferred by federal statutes 28 U.S.C. sec. 1331, 31 U.S.C. ?? 3729 et seq., 18 U.S.C. ?? 1961 et seq. and directly under theUS Constitution.

11. VENUE: Venue is proper here because, inter alia, plaintiffs live here and one of the skyjacked aircraft that crashed on sept. 11, 2001 (UAL flight # 93) wasbound for San Francisco, ca, and because plaintiffs suffered damages here as they reside here. Also 18 US CODE ? 1965 and 31 US CODE ? 3729-3731 provided thatactions under RICO and the Federal Fraudulent Claims Act may be brought in the d

istrict where the person injured (plaintiffs) resides. Plaintiffs reside in thisdistrict.

12. Plaintiffs aver that defendants all conspired with the government of Saudi Arabia("GSA") prior to 9/11/01 to knowingly finance, encourage, recruit, permit,and aid and abet, certain individuals to carry out the 9/11/01 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, in order to orchestrate a contrived, stylized andartificial "second Pearl Harbour" event for the purpose of galvanizing public support for their military adventure agenda in the middle east, and in order to persuade congress to enact their repressive patriot acts I and ii for the purposeof suppressing political dissent inside the us. Plaintiffs aver that defendantsBush et al. Knew about plans by "Al Quaeda" to launch the 911 attacks (hereinafter referred to as "the 911 acts"), and conspired with gSA to fund, finance and

encourage said Al Quaeda individuals (many of whom were acting as informants andagents of defendants) to mount the 911 attacks, and allowed these attacks to occur deliberately, thereby violating clearly established rights of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also are informed and believe, and so aver, that defendants orchestrated the 911 acts and utilized a technology known as "fly by wire"("fbw"), i.e., remote control of aircraft, in the 911 acts. Said technology is also employed in the "global hawk" aircraft and military drone aircraft, and in commercial aircraft used in the 911 acts. Then, defendants concocted a scheme to cover up what they had done and suppress their prior knowledge and approval of the 911 acts.

13. Plaintiffs also aver that defendants knowingly utilized the climate of fearand hysterical created by the 911 acts, and deliberately concocted untrue and fraudulent claims of "weapons of mass destruction" ("WMD") said to be present in Iraq, from 9/11/01 through the present, and particularly in october 2002, when defendants presented these false claims to congress in order to obtain a resolution "Enabling act" which Bush then used to launch a preemptive war against the sovereign state of Iraq.

14. As a proximate result of defendants' acts and violation of the constitutionand clearly established rights of plaintiffs, plaintiffs suffered severe damagein loss of taxpayer revenues, emotional distress, loss of government services, and other damages. Plaintiffs have been prevented from exercising their free speech rights by us forest rangers and other officials, who have banned distributionof certain literature that is critical of defendants' handling of the 911 acts(Plaintiff Scott MUNSUN was stopped by federal park rangers from distributing li

terature critical of defendants and Bush and the 911 acts, at Baker Beach in SanFrancisco, on or about May 28, 2003, and his literature was confiscated by theranger). Plaintiffs have been approached by defendants, federal officials, and h


23/27

ave had their literature and videotapes etc seized, and have been threatened with arrest if they did not cease distributing the literature and videos. Plaintiffs have been fired from their jobs, including plaintiff ashes, who was fired fromhis job at a Nieman Marcus department store in San Francisco (and assaulted byNieman Marcus store employees telling him "you cant distribute that, the countryis 'at war.'") on or about Feb. 23, 2003, for distributing any 911-related or anti-Iraq-war literature and videos critical of the government. Under the guise o

f the mantra, "the country is at war," plaintiffs have suffered loss of freedomsand loss of tax dollars. And all the while, all the while., defendants have continued to march forward with their cavalcade of horrors intended to frighten theplaintiffs into coughing up endless moneys. Plaintiffs have also lost libertiesas defendants have finagled new laws and rules and regulations enabling them toread private e mail, wiretap, etc., all of which violate plaintiffs; 4th amendment rights to freedom from unreasonable governed search and seizure and plaintiff have suffered loss of liberty, loss of freedom etc. as defendants have proceeded on their plan to disable us democracy and impose totalitarian controls and laws, solely in order to tighten their grip on power for political ends. PlaintiffTIBBS is a veteran who has been damaged by being forced to accept smaller amounts of military pensions and other benefits than would otherwise be the case but

for the expensive and wasteful wars of aggression conducted by defendants in Iraq etc., which have bankrupted the us economy and prevented veterans from gettingtheir just rewards in the form of medical and health services, pensions etc. Also plaintiffs are informed and believe that defendants have utilized and implemented the USA PATRIOT ACTS I AND II to spy on them, invade their privacy, intercept communications intended to be private, invade the privacy of what books theyread at libraries and bought at bookstores, what financial accounts they have and what financial transactions they engaged in, etc. Also the defendants appear to be prepared to strip some of the plaintiffs of their US citizenship under theUSA PATRIOT ACTS I AND II, as a mens of suppressing political dissent. This violation of plaintiffs' rights has been brazen in its scope and dangerous.

15. Defendant Bush and the other defendants have deliberately conspired with the

government of Saudi Arabia to harm the interests of plaintiffs, and to violateplaintiffs' clearly established rights, and to manipulate petroleum prices, which have more than doubled since fall 2001, from $ 16/bbl to $ 40/bbl. in addition, Defendants created "sweetheart deals" with certain companies and awarded thesedeals to "reconstruct and rebuild" Iraq. These companies include defendant Cheney's company Haliburton, Bechtel and others. Taxpayer money has been showered onthese companies which damaged plaintiffs' rights and interests.

16. There is no adequate remedy at law to compensate plaintiff and protect themfrom future acts of grossly negligent and intentional malfeasance in office by defendants, and therefore plaintiff ask for and are entitled to receive an injunction removing defendants from office and enjoining them from carrying out any further duties in defense of this country. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that defendants are dangerous and hence an injunction should issue requiring defendants to fulfill their constitutional duties forthwith, or remove themselves fromoffice or be removed from office by all legitimate constitutional means.

17. The USA Patriot Acts, I and II, planned and implemented by defendants as a means of suppressing and chilling exercise of political dissent, violate plaintiffs' constitutional rights under the 1st, 5th, fourth and 14th amendments to theconstitution, in that they constitute an invasion of privacy and give the federal government vast unconstitutional powers to spy on us citizens, i.e., plaintiffs, for defendants; own nefarious political purpose. Ashcroft should be enjoinedfrom enforcing the patriot laws.

18. The actions, misfeasance, malfeasance and other acts committed by defendantsas alleged above, in the first cause of action, amount to negligence, misfeasance malfeasance in discharge of defendants duties to plaintiffs, and defendants h


24/27

ave breached the duty they had to protect plaintiffs from terrorists and physical and emotional harm.

19. As a proximate result of defendants' malfeasance and violation of the constitution, plaintiffs suffered severe damage in regard to emotional distress, lossof government services, waste of government money, creation of huge federal budget deficits and resultant interest (including interest paid to GSA), diminution

of federal services and funds due to diverting funds to Bush's Iraq misadventure, etc. . plaintiffs have also lost liberties as defendants have finagled new laws and rules and regulations enabling them to read private e mail, wiretap, etc.,. all of which violate plaintiffs; 4th amendment rights to freedom from unreasonable governed search and seizure and plaintiff have suffered loss of liberty, loss of freedom etc.., as defendants have proceeded on their plan to disable us democracy and impose totalitarian controls and laws, solely in order to tighten their grip on power for political ends.

20. Whereas defendants pose a "clear and present danger" to the lives and liberties and freedoms of plaintiffs, and to the us treasury which they have been bankrupting by wasteful wastrel spending on meaningless wars of aggression, and wher

eas there is no adequate remedy at law to compensate plaintiff and protect themfrom future acts of grossly negligent and intentional malfeasance in office by defendants, and therefore plaintiff ask for and are entitled to receive an injunction removing defendants from office and enjoining them from carrying out any further duties in defense of this country. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that defendants are dangerous and hence an injunction should issue requiring defendants to fulfill their constitutional duties forthwith, or remove themselves fromoffice or be removed from office by all legitimate constitutional means.

Wherefore plaintiffs pray for relief as hereinafter alleged.

Second cause of action: Violation of Fraudulent Claims Act: 31 U.S.C. ?? 3729, 3730 et seq (Brought in the name of the United States Government pursuant to 31 U

.S.C. ? 3730(b)

21. Paragraphs 1 through 20 are repeated here and incorporated by reference.

22. The actions of defendants as described supra amount to presentation of falseclaims to Congress for taxpayer money in violation of the FEDERAL FRAUDULENT CLAIMS ACT ("FCA") , 31 U.S.C. ?? 3729 et seq., in that defendants all presented to Congress false and fraudulent claims to Congress "for payment or approval" from 9/11/01 through present, in that defendants presented a fraudulent claim to Congress that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction ('WMD"), when this was infact totally untrue and defendants had utterly no evidence of WMD in Iraq (as proven by the fact that after 18 months of war and search, defendants have failedto find any WMD anywhere in Iraq. Therefore this is evidence that defendants must have presented a deliberately false and fraudulent claim before Congress in october 2002 and other times between 9/11/01 and the present, a fraudulent claimfor taxpayer moneys. Defendants also presented fraudulent claims to Congress from 9/12/01 to the present that "Osama Bin Laden" was a live leader of a worldwideconspiracy to deploy WMD against the US and to destroy and inflict severe damage against the US, when in fact defendants knew that Osama Bin Laden had been killed many years before 9/11/01. Hence they fraudulently presented a dead man as the casus belli justifying waste of resources to pursue a pointless War against Afghanistan. Defendants also presented fraudulent claims to Congress from 9/11/01to the present, that Saddam Hussein and the government of Iraq were linked to Bin Laden and al Quaeda and that Hussein and Iraq had been involved in planning and executing the 911 attacks. These utterly fraudulent claims were used by defen

dants to finagle public funds out of Congress for pointless wars against Iraq, and waste of the treasury funds. These were fraudulent claims because Bush et alwent before congress in october 2002, through the present, and presented a false


25/27

claim that there were weapons of mass destruction ensconced in Iraq, which requiring immediate military action to obviate an imminent attack on the us. Defendant Rice fraudulently alleged that a "mushroom cloud" over the USA (to be launched by Iraq) was a clear and present danger that was imminent, and Bush et al. Claimed that Iraq had bought nuclear weapons material, chemical and biological weapons ("CBW"), and other WMD and that Iraq planned to deploy such weapons againstthe USA. All of these claims were false and fraudulent, and known to defendants

to be false and fraudulent at the time they were made. This violated the FederalFraudulent Claims Act ("FCA")

23. Plaintiffs have standing to bring this civil action under 31 U.S.C. sec. 3730(b), as us citizens.

24. The statute of limitations for this cause of action is 6 years-see 31 U.S.C.?3731. Hence the action is timely.

25. As a proximate result of said violation of the FCA, plaintiffs have suffereddamages, to wit, loss of taxpayer money on a useless and purposeless boondogglein Iraq, denial and reduction in public services because of the diverting of fe

deral taxpayer funds to the Iraq misadventure, loss of life in a purposeless activity, infliction of emotional distress, creation of huge federal budget deficits and resultant interest charges (including interest paid to gSA), etc.

26. Plaintiffs request an order compelling defendants to reimburse the US treasury for the federal funds they defrauded the Congress into giving them, by makingdeliberately false and fraudulent claims of WMD, mushroom clouds, CBW and the like.

Wherefore plaintiffs pray for relief as hereinafter described.

Third cause of action: RICO statute: 18 US CODE ?? 1961 ET SEQ.24. Paragraphs 1through 23 are repeated here and incorporated by reference.

25. All of the above-described acts by defendants constitute a violation of theRICO statute, 18 US CODE ?? 1961 ET SEQ. In particular, defendants have receivedincome derived from a pattern of racketeering activity and have used and invested such income in the acquisition of interests in, ands establishment of operations of, certain enterprises, such as the Iraq "reconstruction" program whereby defendants' cronies such as Defendant Cheney's company Haliburton and Bechtel have won sweetheart deals to "rebuild"the very infrastructure that defendants havedestroyed or damaged through mindless military action, in pursuit of defendants'dubious goals. Plaintiffs aver that defendants have engaged in pattern of tam Marte quam Mercurio and that the "war" in Iraq has been a cover for racketeeringactivity, such as the sweetheart deals, described supra. The cover-up by defendants of the genesis of the 911 acts has been a conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. ? 1961, as well. This has been a conspiracy to obstruct justice. As part of the coverup, during the days following 9/11/01, defendants knowingly allowed members of the Saudi royal family and Bin Laden family to fly out of the USA at a time when all other flights were grounded. The purpose of allowing these criminalsto escape the country was to prevent anyone from questioning them about their complicity in causing the 911 attacks. The coverup also has taken the shape of acampaign of intimidation and suppression of FBI agents and informants who knew about the true genesis if the 911 attacks. For example, when FBI translators andagents and informants sent letters and e mails and documents to defendants priorto 9/11/01, warning them of imminent threats of attack, defendants suppressed these, forbade the informants from speaking publicly or to the 911 commission later, and imposed a policy of Omerta.

26. Plaintiffs have standing to bring this cause of action because of 18 US Code?1964 in that plaintiffs aver that there is a causal link between defendants' v


26/27

iolation of 18 U.S.C. ?? 1961-1962 and plaintiffs' injuries.

27. As a proximate result OF THE VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. ? 1961 by defendants, plaintiffs have suffered damages including denial of their rights to receive fede3ral services and funds, invasion of their privacy and constitutional rights by the defendants via US PATRIOT ACTS and spying, credit damage etc.

Prayer for relief:Plaintiffs pray for relief against each defendant as follows:

1. For declaratory relief, an order declaring that the USA PATRIOT ACTS I AND IIare null and void for violation the Constitution, and declaring the defendants'actions to have violated RICO and the FCA, and an injunction enjoining defendants from implementing the USA PATRIOT ACTS I AND II;

2. An order to defendants requiring them to release all information they have concerning the genesis and execution of the 911 acts;

3. Declaratory judgment declaring USA patriot acts I and II to be unconstitutional, null and void;

4. An order compelling defendants and their cronies and business associates, including Bechtel corp; and Haliburton corp., to reimburse the US treasury for alltax dollars gained by them, which tax dollars have been extracted from plaintiffs, us taxpayers on the basis of false and fraudulent information;

6. An injunction forbidding defendants, and defendant Ashcroft and his justice dept., from enforcing patriot acts I or ii, and declaratory relief in the for ofan order declaring both patriot acts to be unconstitutional.

7. For monetary damages according to proof;

8. For reasonable attorney fees and costs of suit;

7. For all other appropriate relief deemed proper.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 8/27/04

SG Hilton Attorneyhttp://www.totse.com/en/law/high_profile_legal_cases/stanleyhiltonl179330.html

The Stanley Hilton InterviewPOSTED: 09.17.04 @21:54

the facts that adversely effected the industry and innovation were popped open by a RepublicanTranscript: Alex Jones Interviews Stanley Hilton

The Alex Jones Show September 13 2004

The MP3 of this interview is available at http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole?s chief of staff, very successfulcounselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He issuing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out ? half of New Yo


27/27

rkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it?s great to have youon with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We?ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell

, you have a lawsuit going, you?ve deposed a lot of military officers. You knowthe truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well aseye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons.AJ: That?s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. A

nd now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lotof people and you?ve got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim?s families involved?.

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidenceyou?ve got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers? class action lawsuit as wellas a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented f

alse and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And,of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

..

Stanley Hilton

Documents

Transcript of Stanley Hilton