Standards and AR Status as of April 4 2011

Standards and ARStatus as of April 4 2011

Christine PereyPEREY Research & Consulting

Overview

• AR Perspectives vary and are evolving• Relevant Standards Development

Organizations• Relevant Industry Associations• The International AR Standards Community

– Achievements– Future Directions

• Engagement options

April 4, 2011 (c) 2011 Christine Perey 2

An Ecosystem Perspective of AR

CONTENT Providers/Publishers

PACKAGING DELIVERY

Enablers Providers of AR-enabling technology

Brands and Merchants

CLIENT DEVICES

The

Phys

ical

Wor

ld

The

Dig

ital W

orld


An Architecture Perspective of AR

Other Local and Cloud ResourcesOther Local and Cloud ResourcesApril 4, 2011 (c) 2011 Christine Perey 4

Multiple AR Domains


AR UX

AR Topics Landscape and Relevant Organizations

Source: International AR Standards Meeting October 2010


Content

7April 4, 2011 (c) 2011 Christine Perey

Standards Development Organizations

• Open Geospatial Consortium• W3C• Khronos Group• ISO SC24• Open Mobile Alliance• Others

– Object Management Group– OASIS CGM Open– SEDRIS Technologies– IETF


Acceleration APIsSensor APIs

3D Data Formats

Browser Standards

Mobile hardwareinterfaces

Location/GeoSpatialStandardsSensorWeb

X3DX3Dom

Mobile softwareinterfaces

Display Technology


Graphics Repreesentation

Industry Associations

• GSMA• MIPI• SID• MMA• IGDA• Web3D Consortium


The International AR Standards Community

• Grassroots – Without administrative role or structure– Composed of people seeking

open and interoperable AR content and experiences• Across the AR ecosystem and expert domains

– Companies, Universities, Research Groups– Wealth of knowledge in implementation of AR

• Visibility into activities of many Standards Development Organizations (SDOs)


http://www.arstandards.org

Developing an AR Terminology

• “Native” AR terms and synonyms• Other communities

– Semantic Web– Geo-spatial– Developers, User Experience Designers– Computer Vision– Social– End Users– Gamers


Contributed Position Papers

• Over 30 papers published– Geo Spatial– Visual AR– User Experience with AR– Vertical market experiences/use cases– Challenges for market growth


Developed AR Use Case Categories

• To extract concrete components

• Determine which components in common

• Prioritize focus for future work

• Three Broad use case categories– Guide– Create– Play


Guide

• A system that leads the user through any process involving real world in real time

OBJECT

http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/AR_Guide_Use_Case.pdf April 4, 2011 (c) 2011 Christine Perey 17

Create

• A system with which the user attaches/contributes a digital content “object” to or in the real world

Personal Content

http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/AR_Create_Use_Case.pdf April 4, 2011 (c) 2011 Christine Perey 18

Play• A system that supports bi-directional interaction

between users and the real world


Upcoming Meeting (the Third)

• June 15-16, 2011• Taichung, Taiwan• Permit sharing among SDOs• New issues

– Indoor positioning– AR and Spatial Law

• In conjunction with OGC TC and meeting of the Mass Market Domain Working Group


http://www.perey.com/ARStandards/third-international-ar-standards-meeting/

Future Directions for Community

• Outreach to more constituents– Companies of all sizes– Relevant industry associations– Standards bodies

• Design of testbeds• Advocacy for open and interoperable AR

– Community – Government policy


Engagement Options

• Join AR Standards mailing lists– http://ARstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion– http://ARstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/news

• Engage via – SDOs in which your company is a member– Sponsorship of (and/or participation in) AR

community • Support standards in implementation

roadmaps • Recommend standards to strategic partners


Mobile Augmented Reality

Christine [email protected]

+41 79 436 68 69+1 (617) 848-8159

RealityImproved

Standards and AR Status as of April 4 2011

Documents

Transcript of Standards and AR Status as of April 4 2011