Embed Size (px)
Transcript of SS Kuniang
Bidding for the S.S. Kuniang Author(s): David E. Bell and Ed Brown Source: Interfaces, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Mar. - Apr., 1984), pp. 17-23 Published by: INFORMS Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25060538 Accessed: 09/06/2010 13:51Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=informs. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
INFORMS is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Interfaces.
for the S.S. Kuniang
Graduate School of Business Administration DAVIDE. BELL George F. Baker Foundation Harvard University Soldiers Field Boston, Massachusetts
to bid for the England Electric was pondering whether ship, the S.S. Kuniang. The ship salvage rights to a grounded could be repaired and used to haul coal for the utility's power stations, recently converted from oil. A bid was determined using a decision tree, a simulation, and net present valuecalculations.April 9, 1981, the S.S. Kuniang, built in Britain and sailing under the British flag, ran aground off the coast of Florida. vessel salvageauction.
electricity. NEP had of its oil-fired this meant colliers
recently power that NEEI
a total rights
the ship's owners declared to sell the loss and offered by means of a sealed bid
some converting to coal and stations had to contract for
Electric System England com is a public utility holding (NEES) customers pany serving over one million in Massachusetts, Hampshire. Rhode Island and New A NEES Inc. New subsidiary, has among (NEEI),
to New to bring coal from Virginia NEES had already concluded England. that it could lower the cost of electricity to its customers its shareholders the colliers shipping partnership and improve the return to and operating by owning it had no prior itself. Because NEEI went into experience with an established
England Energy, its duties the job of supplying fuel to another NEES the New Eng subsidiary, land Power Company (NEP) which operCopyright ? 1984, The Institute of Management Sciences 0092-2102/84/1402/0017$01.25 This paper was refereed.
shipping a 36,250 and then commissioned company ton self-unloading from General ship in early 1983, at a for delivery Dynamics,DECISION ANALYSIS ? APPLICATIONS
INTERFACES 14: 2March-April 1984 (pp. 17-23)
BELLcost of $70 million. Because cient NEP, their not be suffi ship would all the coal required by to expand they were exploring ways fleet when the Kuniang went down. to move could be restored with a it would one to guide them, it was unknown basis they would do this. The on what
scrap value of the Kuniang was clearly less than $5 but there was a strong possibility million that the Coast Guard would the consider amount of the winning bid an indication of the ship's true salvage value. Not only a working was it impossible to discover from the of "salvage value" Coast Guard but also they were not to rule on the Kuniang until scheduled definition after the auction. a bid of partner had suggested so that whichever interpreta NEEI's $3 million
If the Kuniang be an excellent of 51,000 modate tons
prospect; it would more remaining
capacity than accom
Complications In 1920, in a spirit of protectionism, the US Congress the Jones Act which passed restricted American coastwise trade (American to vessels Americans. the use port built, to American owned port) solely and operated by it gave priority in
of docking facilities to these "Jones Act" ships. This was no small as the wait for coal privilege loading at and Norfolk, News ports like Newport had sometimes reached 45 days. Virginia The Kuniang was not American built; this was a potentially crippling handicap, since without delays a round trip for NEEI would A take only eight days. law (US Code long overlooked Title a
to Not only was it impossible discover a working definition of "salvage value" from the Coast Guard but also they were not scheduled to rule on the Kuniang until after theauction.tion of salvage value there would adopted if NEEI chose the Coast Guard
to bid more
But be no problem. than $5 million
14, enacted December 23, a way out. It 1852) provided permitted as foreign built ship to be regarded
itmight have to find some way to increase the cost of repairs in order to qualify the as a Jones Act vessel. Kuniang was to increase the cost of repairs way to install self-unloading in equipment the ship. This would cost an extra $21 mil One lion but would voyage time trip from 8 days to 5 by reducing time substantially. However, shorten the round
owners built if: (1) the previous the ship a total loss (which the owners of the Kuniang had done) and (2) the cost of repairs was at least three times the salvage shipping repairing lion. Was value of the ship. NEES's had estimated the cost of at around $15 mil
partner the Kuniang
unloading the presence lower
the salvage value of the Kuniang less than $5 million? The US Coast Guard responsible for determining the value for the purposes but with
of the equipment would the capacity of the Kuniang from 51,000 tons to 40,000 tons. A way to avoid complications with the to forget the Jones Act entirely was an American-built Kuniang and buy ship.
ship's salvage these provisions,
INTERFACES 14:2 18
S.S. KUNIANGGeneral had offered NEEI pro Dynamics to a sister ship at virtually duction rights the same price as the first. NEEI also had an offer from another shipbuilder for a tug/barge combination. Table 1 gives financial and operating new vessel details of the four competing alternatives. Figure 1 shows a decision so far. tree representation Ship Overcapacity NEP was planning plants per year were Basic Data Capital Cost ($MM) Equity Required ($MM) (40%)& Capacity (M Tons) Unloading System Speed (knots) of the problem to convert which coal under a already burning environmental temporary permit. Perma was anticipated in the nent permission was near future. At Salem Harbor 750,000 tons a year would be required but the conver sion was not yet finished and the en vironmental less far advanced. hearings require plant would was tons per year but conversion 250,000 not due to take place for a number of
to coal. Three million required
tons of coal Point,General Dynamics 70 21
for years. So although NEP was planning a 4 million tons per year, it of requirement was possible never that this level would Kuniang (Gearless) 226.6 45.75d Gearless 14
Tug/Barge 329.6 30 Gearless 9 7.15
Kuniang (Self-Unloader) 4312.9 40 Self-unload 14
Round Trip (BP) (days)e Round Trip (Egypt) (days)($/Day) Costs
Operating Fixed Costs Interest (18%) Equity Return (20%)
$18,670 2,400 22,200 12,353 $55,623
$12,000 2,400 10,164 5,647 $30,111
$23,000 2,400 6,988 3,882 $36,270
$24,300 2,700 13,659 7,589 $48,248
Revenue per Trip Coal to Brayton Point (thousand dollars per trip) Grain to Egyptc (million dollars per trip)
2.10 2.54 ?These figures have been reduced to reflect the costs of tying up dock space during unloading. "The investment tax credit of 10% reduces the effective contribution to 30%. cThis was considered a representative trip. dThe Kuniang could not carry a full load into Brayton Point because the harbor is too shallow. eIt is assumed that a Jones Act vessel would experience no delays at Virginia ports.
Table 1: Financial and operating data for the four ship options open to NEES had been offered two new ships: a sister ship to the collier it had already ordered from General Dynamics, and a if it bid successfully for the Kuniang, it could choose tug/barge combination: Alternatively, whether or not to install self-unloading equipment. The Kuniang data assumes a successful bid of $7 million and, in the case of the gearless option, that the Coast Guard sets a salvage value of $5 million or less.
BELLSelf-Unloader Scrap Value Gearless