Worker 1: Collar Worker 2: Collar Button (button 1) Worker 3: Outline of blouse body
Sruta Keerti Kasula 1. SRU-Server Request Unit 3 TCP timeout Worker 1 Worker 2 Worker 3 Worker 4...
-
Upload
eugene-johnson -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
11
Transcript of Sruta Keerti Kasula 1. SRU-Server Request Unit 3 TCP timeout Worker 1 Worker 2 Worker 3 Worker 4...
1
Congestion control in data centers
Sruta Keerti Kasula
Data center structure
SRU-Server Request Unit
Incast
3
TCP timeout
Worker 1
Worker 2
Worker 3
Worker 4
Aggregator
RTOmin = 300 ms
Caused by Partition/Aggregate.
TCP is 25 years old, designed for low bandwidth delay product.
The higher the Bandwidth-Delay product, the less efficient TCP’s congestion control algorithms such as AIMD.
Networks with high delays makes TCP react slower to packet drops. Additionally, bandwidth is reacquired more slowly in such networks.
Why develop XCP?
XCP protocol
XCP introduces a 20 byte header between IP and TCP that carries information about the sender’s desired bandwidth and information about what the routers allow.
XCP requires all routers and hosts in the network to use the XCP protocol in order to work as intended.
Application
TCP
XCP
IP
Link
The TCP/XCP/IP stack
XCP’s solution
XCP allows the routers in the network to continuously do the adjustments by changing the contents of the packets (XCP header) transferred between the sender and receiver.
Router Router
XCP provides a theoretically analysis, yet effective approach to congestion control.
An XCP network (simplified)Network RTT: 100 msRouter’s capacity: 200.000 B/s (available 200.000 B/s)Sender’s capacity: 10.000.000 B/s (available 10.000.000
B/s)Sender’s current throughput: 0 B/s (or 0 B/ms)
1 1 6 20 0
100
0
10.000.000
0
Sender
1 1 6 20 0
100
0
200.000
0
Router
1 2 6 20 0
100
0
0
200.000
Receiver
RTTCurrent ThroughputDelta ThroughputFeedback
An XCP network (simplified)Network RTT: 100 msRouter’s capacity: 200.000 B/s (0 B/s is available)Sender’s capacity: 10.000.000 B/s (9.800.000 B/s is
available)Sender’s current throughput: 200.000 B/s (or 200 B/ms)
1 1 6 20 0
100
200
9.800.000
0
Sender
1 1 6 20 0
100
200
0
0
Router
1 2 6 20 0
100
0
0
0
Receiver
RTTCurrent ThroughputDelta ThroughputFeedback
DCTCP
9
Sender 1
Sender 2
Receiver
ECN Mark (1 bit)
ECN = Explicit Congestion Notification
Data Center TCP AlgorithmData Center TCP AlgorithmSwitch side:
◦ Mark packets when Queue Length > K.
19
KMarkDon’t Mark
DCTCP satisfies all our requirements for Data Center packet transport.
Handles bursts well Keeps queuing delays low Achieves high throughput
Features: Very simple change to TCP and a single
switch parameter K. Based on ECN mechanisms already
available in commodity switch.
The available bandwidth at the receiver is used as a quota to increase the receiver window size on all incoming connections.
Congestion control is performed for each flow independently in slotted RTT and this is also the control latency in the feedback loop.
A receive window based scheme is considered i.e., Ratio of difference of expected and measured throughput over expected is used to adjust the receiver window size.
ICTCP Observations
It’s a window based congestion control algorithm at TCP receiver-side.
The experimental results demonstrated that ICTCP was effective to avoid congestion by achieving almost zero timeout for TCP Incast, and it provided high performance and fairness among competing flows
ICTCP
folk.uio.no/paalh/students/PetterMosebekk.ppt http://www.academia.edu/2160335/
A_Survey_on_TCP_Incast_in_Data_Center_Networks http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jce/papers/ICAET-2014/volume-
4/2.pdf?id=7557 http://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/10675849/
ictcp-incast-congestion-control-for-tcp-in-data-center-sigcomm
Haitao Wu? et al., ICTCP: Incast Congestion Control for TCP in Data Center Networks, proceedings ACM CoNEXT 2010
V. Jacobson and M. Karels, Congestion Avoidance and Control, In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM '88. understand congestion problem
http://slideplayer.us/slide/2304322/#
References