Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education...

93
Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 93 Page ID #:1999 EXHIBIT 1

Transcript of Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education...

Page 1: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 1 of 93 Page ID #:1999

EXHIBIT 1

Page 2: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 2 of 93 Page ID

#:2000

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

CASE No.: 12-cv-5062 PSG BYRON BROWN, TIANQING ZHANG, (AJW) AND ROBERTO SALAZAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF CLASS ACTION ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF

vs. SETTLEMENT

AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD., Courtroom: 880 JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, XUEJUN

Judge: Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez

XIE, MARK ROBERT HARRIS, LISA LO, Compl. Filed: June 11, 2012 DANIEL PHILLIPS, TAO SUN AND

Trial Date: N/A

SASHA CHANG

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (the “Stipulation”) dated

October 24, 2014 is hereby submitted to the Court pursuant to Rule 23 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subject to the approval of the Court, this

Stipulation is entered into among Lead Plaintiff Tianqing Zhang (“Lead Plaintiff”)

and Named Plaintiffs Byron Brown and Roberto Salazar (collectively,

“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the putative class; and Ambow

Education Holding Ltd. (“Ambow”), Jin Huang, Paul Chow, Mark Robert Harris,

Daniel Phillips, Tao Sun, Lisa Lo, and Shasha Chang (collectively, “Defendants”),

by and through their respective counsel of record in the litigation.

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 3: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 3 of 93 Page ID

#:2001

1 I. LITIGATION AND PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS

2

1. WHEREAS a class action complaint styled Brown v. Ambow

3 Education Holding Ltd., et al. , 12-CV-5480-MMS-SSx, alleging violations of

4 federal securities laws was filed in the United States District Court for the Central

5 District of California (the “Court”);

6

2. WHEREAS, by Minute Order dated November 19, 2012, the

7 Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez appointed Tianqing Zhang as Lead Plaintiff and the

8 Rosen Law Firm, P.A. as Lead Counsel, consolidated the related cases 12-cv-5480

9 and 12-cv-5062, and ordered that all subsequent papers, pleadings and motions be

10 filed under case 12-cv-5062-PSG (AJW);

11

3. WHEREAS, on February 19, 2013, Lead Plaintiff filed the

12 Consolidated Amended Complaint alleging: (First Claim) violations of Section

13 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange

14 Act”) against Ambow, Huang and Chow; (Second Claim) violations of Rule 20(a)

15 of the Exchange Act against Huang and Chow; (Third Claim) violations of Section

16 11 of the Securities Act (the “Securities Act”) against all Defendants; and (Fourth

17 Claim) violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act against Huang and Chow;

18

4. WHEREAS, on May 3, 2013, Lead Plaintiff filed the Second

19 Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleging: (First Claim) violations of

20 Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act against Ambow, Huang and

21 Chow; (Second Claim) violations of Rule 20(a) of the Exchange Act against

22 Huang and Chow; (Third Claim) violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act (the

23 “Securities Act”) against all Defendants; and (Fourth Claim) violations of Section

24 15 of the Securities Act against Huang and Chow;

25

5. WHEREAS, on October 7, 2014, Defendants filed motions to dismiss

26 Plaintiffs’ SAC;

27

28

2

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 4: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 4 of 93 Page ID

#:2002

1

6. WHEREAS, on February 6, 2014, this Court granted Defendants’

2 motions to dismiss as to all claims, with leave to amend;

3

7. WHEREAS, on March 17, 2014, Lead Plaintiff filed the Third

4 Amended Complaint (“TAC” or “Complaint”) in this action (the “Litigation”)

5 alleging: (First Claim) violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange

6 Act against Ambow, Huang and Chow; (Second Claim) violations of Rule 20(a) of

7 the Exchange Act against Huang and Chow; (Third Claim) violations of Section 11

8 of the Securities Act (the “Securities Act”) against all Defendants; and (Fourth

9 Claim) Section 15 of the Securities Act against Huang and Chow;

10

8. WHEREAS, Defendants have each denied and continue to deny each

11 and all of the claims alleged by Plaintiffs in the Litigation; have expressly denied

12 and continue to deny all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out

13 of any of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions alleged, or that could have

14 been alleged, in the Litigation; have denied and continue to deny, among other

15 allegations, the allegations that Plaintiffs or the putative class have suffered any

16 damage, that Ambow’s Registration Statement in connection with its initial public

17 offering misrepresented the nature of its acquisition of the Changsha Study School,

18 that Ambow inflated its software revenue by improperly recording accounts

19 receivable, or that Ambow engaged in intentionally deceptive accounting practices

20 concerning its allowance for doubtful accounts;

21

9. WHEREAS, while Defendants believe that the evidence developed to

22 date supports their position that they acted properly at all times and that the

23 Litigation is without merit, Defendants have concluded that further conduct of the

24 Litigation would be protracted and expensive, and that it is desirable that the

25 Litigation be fully and finally settled in the manner and upon the terms and

26 conditions set forth in this Stipulation;

27

28

3

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 5: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 5 of 93 Page ID

#:2003

1

10. WHEREAS, in recognition of the attendant risks and costs of

2 continued litigation and the benefits of resolving the Litigation, the parties hereto

3 desire to settle and resolve any and all actual or potential claims by, between, or

4 among Plaintiffs and Settlement Class Members, on the one hand, and Defendants

5 and the Released Parties, on the other hand, arising out of or relating to the subject

6 matter of the Litigation, which includes but is not limited to the following claims:

7 S

The claim that Ambow’s Registration Statement in connection with

8 Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) misrepresented the nature of its

9 acquisition of the Changsha Study School; 10

S

The claim that Ambow inflated its software revenue by improperly 11

recording accounts receivable; and 12

13 S

The claim that Ambow engaged in intentionally deceptive accounting

14 practices concerning its allowance for doubtful accounts;

15

11. WHEREAS, the parties to this Stipulation (the “Settling Parties”)

16 agree that the Litigation is being voluntarily settled after advice of counsel and that

17 the terms of the Settlement are fair, adequate, and reasonable, and that this

18 Stipulation shall not be construed as or be deemed to be a concession by Plaintiffs

19 of any infirmity in the claims asserted in the Litigation or a concession by any

20 Defendant as to the merit of the claims asserted in the Litigation;

21

12. WHEREAS, the Settling Parties wish to settle and compromise any

22 dispute regarding the Litigation or its subject matter, including, but not limited to,

23 whether the Litigation was filed by the Lead Plaintiff and defended by Defendants

24 in good faith and with adequate basis in fact under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of

25 Civil Procedure;

26

13. WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel has conducted an investigation

27 relating to the claims and the underlying events and transactions alleged in the

28

4

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 6: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 6 of 93 Page ID

#:2004

1 Litigation, and Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel has analyzed the facts and the applicable

2 law with respect to the claims of the Lead Plaintiff against Defendants and the

3 potential defenses thereto, which in the Lead Plaintiff’s judgment have provided

4 adequate and satisfactory basis for the evaluation of an agreement to settle, as

5 described herein;

6

14. WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel and Defendants’ counsel

7 participated in two full-day mediation conferences with mediator Hunter Hughes

8 and engaged in extensive arm’s-length negotiations with each other, such

9 negotiations bearing fruit in this Stipulation;

10

15. WHEREAS, based upon the investigation conducted by Lead

11 Plaintiff’s Counsel, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel has concluded that the terms and

12 conditions of this Stipulation are fair, reasonable, and adequate to Plaintiffs, and in

13 their best interests, and Lead Plaintiff has agreed to settle the claims asserted in the

14 Litigation pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Stipulation, after

15 considering: (i) the substantial benefits that Plaintiffs will receive from settlement

16 of the Litigation; (ii) the attendant risks of litigation; and (iii) the desirability of

17 permitting the Settlement to be consummated as provided by the terms of this

18 Stipulation;

19

16. WHEREAS, Defendants conditionally stipulate, solely for the limited

20 purposes of this Stipulation and the creation of a settlement class, that the

21 Litigation shall be certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules

22 of Civil Procedure and that the stipulated settlement class consists of Settlement

23 Class Members, as defined below; and

24

17. WHEREAS, Defendants’ conditional stipulation as to the creation of

25 settlement class is contingent upon the execution of this Stipulation by the Settling

26 Parties and its final approval by the Court, and if this Stipulation is for any reason

27 not finally approved, or is otherwise terminated, Defendants reserve their rights to

28

5

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 7: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 7 of 93 Page ID

#:2005

1 assert any and all available objections and defenses to certification of any class

2 Lead Plaintiff will not offer Defendants’ conditional stipulation to certification as

3 any evidence in support of a motion to certify a class for trial purposes;

4

NOW THEREFORE, without any admission or concession on the part of

5 Lead Plaintiff of any lack of merit in the Litigation whatsoever, and without any

6 admission or concession on the part of Defendants of any liability, wrongdoing, or

7 lack of merit in the defenses asserted in the Litigation whatsoever, it is hereby

8 STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Settling Parties, through their

9 respective attorneys, subject to approval of the Court pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the

10 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in consideration of the benefits flowing to the

11 Settling Parties hereto from the Settlement, that any and all claims made, or that

12 could have been made, by Plaintiffs against Defendants in the Litigation shall be

13 compromised, settled, released, and dismissed with prejudice as provided in this

14 Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement, except as hereafter provided, without

15 costs as to Plaintiffs or Defendants, subject to the approval of the Court, upon and

16 subject to the terms and conditions below.

17 II. TERMS OF STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT

18

A. DEFINITIONS

19

As used in this Stipulation, the following terms have the meanings

20 specified below:

21

1. “Allegedly False and Misleading Statements” means all

22 statements that were challenged as misleading by Plaintiffs in the Litigation,

23 including without limitation: (i) the claim that Defendants misrepresented the

24 nature of the acquisition of the Changsha Study School; (ii) the claim that Ambow

25 inflated its revenues from software sales; and (iii) the claim that Ambow engaged

26 in intentionally deceptive accounting practices concerning its allowance for

27 doubtful accounts;

28

6

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 8: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 8 of 93 Page ID

#:2006

1

2. “Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses” means the portion of the Gross

2 Settlement Fund approved by the Court for payment to Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel,

3 including attorneys’ fees, costs, litigation expenses, and fees and expenses of

4 experts (excluding Notice and Administration Expenses).

5

3. “Authorized Claimant” means any Claimant (as defined below)

6 whose claim for recovery has been allowed pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation

7 or by order of the Court.

8

4. “Award to Lead and Named Plaintiffs” means any award by the

9 Court to Lead Plaintiff and/or Named Plaintiffs of reasonable costs and expenses

10 (including lost wages) directly relating to the representation of the Settlement Cla

11 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(4), but does not include Attorneys’ Fees and

12 Expenses or Notice and Administration Expenses.

13

5. “Claimant” means any Settlement Class Member who files a

14 Proof of Claim and Release (as defined below) in such form and manner, and

15 within such time, as set forth in this Stipulation, or as the Court shall prescribe.

16

6. “Claims Administrator” means the accounting and claims

17 administration firm, Strategic Claims Services, Inc., which Lead Plaintiff’s

18 Counsel requests be appointed by the Court to administer the Settlement and

19 disseminate notice to the Settlement Class.

20

7. “Effective Date” means the date on which this settlement

21 becomes “effective,” when (i) all of the conditions set forth below in paragraph

22 L.1. have been satisfied; and (ii) the Court’s Order and Final Judgment,

23 substantially in the form of Exhibit B hereto, becomes “Final.” The Court’s Order

24 and Final Judgment shall be deemed to be “Final” when either of the following has

25 occurred: (i) if an appeal or review is not sought by any person from the Order and

26 Final Judgment, the day following the expiration of the time to appeal or petition

27 from the Order and Final Judgment; or (ii) if an appeal or review is sought from

28

7

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 9: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 9 of 93 Page ID

#:2007

1 the Order and Final Judgment, the day after such Order and Final Judgment is

2 affirmed or the appeal or review is dismissed or denied and such Order and Final

3 Judgment is no longer subject to further judicial review.

4

8. “Escrow Account” means the interest-bearing account selected

5 by the Escrow Agent. The Escrow Account shall be managed by the Escrow

6 Agent for the benefit of Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class until the Effective

7 Date of the Settlement.

8

9. “Escrow Agent” means the Claims Administrator or its duly

9 appointed agent(s). The Escrow Agent shall perform the duties as set forth in this

10 Stipulation.

11

10. “Gross Settlement Fund” means the Settlement Amount plus all

12 interest earned thereon.

13

11. “Lead Plaintiff” means Tianqing Zhang.

14

12. “Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel” means The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.

15

13. “Named Plaintiffs” means Byron Brown and Roberto Salazar.

16

14. “Net Settlement Fund” means the Gross Settlement Fund, less:

17 (i) Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses; (ii) Notice and Administration Expenses; (iii)

18 taxes; (iv) any Award to Lead Plaintiff and/or Named Plaintiffs; and (v) other fees

19 and expenses authorized by the Court.

20

15. “Notice and Administration Account” means the account to be

21 established from the Gross Settlement Fund and maintained by Lead Plaintiff’s

22 Counsel. The Notice and Administration Account may be drawn upon by Lead

23 Plaintiff’s Counsel for Notice and Administration Expenses without further order

24 of the Court.

25

16. “Notice and Administration Expenses” means all expenses

26 incurred (whether or not paid) in connection with the preparation, printing,

27 mailing, and publication of the notice to the Settlement Class of the proposed

28

8

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 10: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 10 of 93 Page ID

#:2008

1 settlement, including any costs charged in the delivery or creation of a list of class

2 members, and all expenses of Settlement administration; provided, however, that

3 none of these expenses shall be deemed to include Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses

4 through the Effective Date. All such Notice and Administration Expenses shall be

5 paid from the Gross Settlement Fund.

6

17. “Order and Final Judgment” means the order and judgment

7 entered by the Court, including a bar order pursuant to the Private Securities

8 Litigation Reform Act 15 U.S. Code § 78u–4(f)(7), approving the Settlement and

9 dismissing the Litigation as against Defendants with prejudice and without costs to

10 any party.

11

18. “Person” means any individual, corporation, partnership,

12 limited liability company or partnership, limited partnership, professional

13 corporation, association, affiliate, joint stock company, trust, estate, unincorporate

14 association, government, or any political subdivision or agency thereof, any other

15 type of legal or political entity, any legal representative, and, as applicable, their

16 respective spouses, heirs, predecessors, successors, representatives, and assigns.

17

19. “Plaintiffs” means the Lead Plaintiff, the Named Plaintiffs and

18 the Settlement Class.

19

20. “Plan of Allocation” means the plan for allocating the Net

20 Settlement Fund (as set forth in the Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class

21 Action (the “Notice”), attached as Exhibit A-1 to the Order of Preliminary

22 Approval of Settlement) to Authorized Claimants after payment of Notice and

23 Administration Expenses, Taxes and Tax Expenses, and Attorneys’ Fees and

24 Expenses. Any Plan of Allocation is not part of the Stipulation and the Released

25 Parties shall have no liability with respect thereto.

26

21. “Released Parties” means Defendants, unserved defendant

27 Xuejun Xie (“Unserved Defendant”), and any and all of Defendants’ and Unserved

28

9

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 11: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 11 of 93 Page ID

#:2009

Defendant’s current, former, or future employers and the current, former, or future

parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, joint venturers, officers, directors,

principals, shareholders, members, agents (acting in their capacity as agents),

employees, attorneys, trustees, insurers (including each of Defendants’ and

Unserved Defendants’ insurers’ respective businesses, affiliates, subsidiaries,

parents and affiliated corporations, divisions, predecessors, shareholders, partners,

joint venturers, principals, insurers, reinsurers, successors and assigns, and their

respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, attorneys, and

9 representatives, if any, and all of them), reinsurers, advisors, associates of any of

10 them (“Defendant Associated Entities” and each a “Defendant Associated Entity”),

11 and/or any other individual or entity in which any Defendant, Unserved Defendant,

12 or Defendant Associated Entity has or had a controlling interest or which is or was

13 related to or affiliated with any Defendant, Unserved Defendant, or Defendant

14 Associated Entity, and the current, former, and future legal representatives, heirs,

15 successors-in-interest, or assigns of any Defendant, Unserved Defendant, or

16 Defendant Associated Entity.

17

22. “Settled Claims” means any and all claims, debts, demands,

18 liabilities, rights, and causes of action of every nature and description whatsoever

19 (including, but not limited to, any claims for damages, interest, attorneys’ fees,

20 expert or consulting fees, and any other costs, expenses, or liabilities whatsoever),

21 whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law, or any other law,

22 rule, or regulation, whether fixed or contingent, accrued or unaccrued, liquidated o

23 unliquidated, at law or in equity, matured or unmatured, whether class or

24 individual in nature, including both known claims and Unknown Claims (as

25 defined below): (i) that have been asserted in the Litigation by the Lead and

26 Named Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members or any of them against any of

27 the Released Parties, including, without limitation, any claim arising out of or

28

10

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 12: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 12 of 93 Page ID

#:2010

1 relating to the Allegedly False and Misleading Statements or any of the alleged

2 acts, omissions, representations, facts, events, matters, transactions, or occurrences

3 asserted in or relating to the Litigation, or otherwise alleged, asserted, or contended

4 in the Litigation; or (ii) that relate to the purchase of Ambow securities, including,

5 without limitation, claims for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, or claims based

6 upon or related in any way to the purchase, acquisition, or sale of Ambow

7 securities during the Class Period by the Lead Plaintiff, Named Plaintiffs, or any

8 Settlement Class Member, that were or might have been asserted on behalf of

9 themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns against

10 the Released Parties or any of them. Settled Claims also include any and all claims

11 arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the Settlement or resolution of the

12 Litigation against the Released Parties (including Unknown Claims that arise out

13 of, relate to, or are in connection with the Settlement or resolution of the Litigation

14 against the Released Parties), except claims to enforce any of the terms of this

15 Stipulation.

16

23. “Settled Defendants’ Claims” means all claims, demands,

17 rights, remedies, liabilities, and causes of action of every nature and description

18 whatsoever, whether based on federal, state, local, statutory, or common law, o

19 any other law, rule, or regulation, including both known and Unknown Claims, tha

20 (i) have been or could have been asserted in the Litigation by Defendants, or any o

21 them, or the successors and assigns of any of them, against any of the Lead and

22 Named Plaintiffs, Settlement Class Members, or any of their attorneys, and (ii

23 arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or Settlement of thi

24 Litigation or the Settled Claims, including but not limited to all claims fo

25 malicious prosecution or sanctions. “Settled Defendants’ Claims” does not includ

26 claims to enforce any of the terms of this Stipulation.

27

28

11

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 13: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 13 of 93 Page ID

#:2011

1

24. “Settlement Class” and “Settlement Class Members” mean, for

2 purposes of this Settlement, all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired

3 Ambow’s American Depository Shares (“ADS”) during the period from its initial

4 public offering on August 5, 2010, through and including February 27, 2013, and

5 held such ADS through at least May 16, 2012, and were damaged by Defendants’

6 alleged misconduct. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants, and all

7 former officers and directors of Ambow, and such excluded persons’ immediate

8 families, legal representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any

9 entity in which any excluded person has or had a controlling interest, Ambow’s

10 predecessors and any persons who have separately filed actions against one or

11 more of Defendants, based in whole or in part on any claim arising out of or

12 relating to any of the alleged acts, omissions, misrepresentations, facts, events,

13 matters, transactions, or occurrences referred to in the Litigation or otherwise

14 alleged, asserted, or contended in the Litigation. Also excluded from the

15 Settlement Class are those persons who file valid and timely requests for exclusion

16 in accordance with the Court’s Order of Preliminary Approval of Settlement

17 (“Preliminary Approval Order”) concerning this Stipulation.

18

25. “Settlement Class Distribution Order” means the order entered

19 by the Court, upon application of Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel following the

20 occurrence of the events identified in paragraph E.13. below, which authorizes the

21 Claims Administrator to distribute the Net Settlement Fund to the Settlement

22 Class.

23

26. “Settlement Class Period” means the period from August 5,

24 2010, to February 27, 2013, inclusive.

25

27. “Settlement” means the settlement contemplated by this

26 Stipulation.

27

28

12

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 14: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 14 of 93 Page ID

#:2012

1

28. “Settlement Amount” means a fund in the amount of

2 US$1,500,000.00 (One and One Half Million U.S. Dollars).

3

29. “Settlement Hearing” means the final hearing to be held by the

4 Court to determine: (i) whether the proposed Settlement should be approved as

5 fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether all Settled Claims should be dismissed

6 with prejudice; (iii) whether an order approving the Settlement should be entered

7 thereon; (iv) whether the allocation of the Settlement Fund should be approved;

8 and (v) whether the application for an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and

9 an Award to Lead and Named Plaintiffs should be approved.

10

30. “Settling Parties” means, collectively, the Lead Plaintiff,

11 Named Plaintiffs, and Defendants.

12

31. “Unknown Claims” means (i) any Settled Claim that the Lead

13 Plaintiff or any Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his,

14 her, or its favor at the time of the release of the Released Parties, which if known

15 by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its decision(s) with respect to the

16 Settlement, including, but not limited to, the decision not to object to the

17 Settlement, provided such claim arises out of or relates to the purchase or sale of

18 the Company’s securities, and (ii) any Settled Defendants’ Claims that any

19 Defendant does not know or expect to exist in his, her, or its favor, which if known

20 by him, her, or it might have affected his, her, or its decision(s) with respect to the

21 Settlement. With respect to any and all Settled Claims and Settled Defendants’

22 Claims, the Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date, the

23 Settling Parties shall expressly waive, and each of the Settlement Class Members

24 shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Order and Final Judgment

25 shall have, expressly waived any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred

26 by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common

27 law that is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Cal. Civ. Code § 1542, which

28

13

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 15: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 15 of 93 Page ID

#:2013

1 provides: “A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does

2 not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the

3 release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her

4 settlement with the debtor. ”

5

B. SCOPE AND EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASES

6

1. The obligations incurred pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in

7 full and final disposition of the Litigation and any and all Settled Claims as against

8 all Released Parties by the Lead Plaintiff, Named Plaintiffs, or any Settlement

9 Class Member, on behalf of themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators,

10 successors, and assigns and any and all Settled Defendants’ Claims as against the

11 Lead Plaintiff, Named Plaintiffs, the Settlement Class Members, and their

12 attorneys.

13

2. The Settling Parties may hereafter discover facts in addition to or

14 different from those which he, she, or it now knows or believes to be true with

15 respect to the subject matter of the Settled Claims, but pursuant to the Order and

16 Final Judgment, upon the Effective Date of this Settlement, the Settlement Class

17 Members on behalf of themselves, their current and future heirs, executors,

18 administrators, successors, attorneys, insurers, agents, representatives, and assigns,

19 and any person they represent, shall, with respect to each and every Settled Claim,

20 release and forever relinquish and discharge, and shall forever be enjoined from

21 commencing, instituting, prosecuting, or continuing to prosecute all Settled Claims

22 and any and all claims arising out of, relating to, or in connection with the

23 Settlement, the Litigation, or the resolution of the Litigation against the Released

24 Parties, whether or not such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers the

25 Proof of Claim and Release, except claims to enforce any of the terms of this

26 Stipulation. Further, all Settlement Class Members on behalf of themselves, their

27 current and future heirs, executors, administrators, successors, attorneys, insurers,

28

14

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 16: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 16 of 93 Page ID

#:2014

1 agents, representatives, and assigns, expressly covenant not to assert, or suggest or

2 assist in the assertion of, any claim or action against any of the Released Parties

3 that: (i) arises out of or relates to the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities,

4 or (ii) that could have been alleged, asserted, or contended in any forum by the

5 Settlement Class Members or any of them against any of the Released Parties,

6 arising out of or relating to the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities, and

7 shall forever be enjoined from commencing, instituting, or prosecuting, or

8 suggesting or assisting in commencing, instituting, or prosecuting any such claim,

9 so long as such claim relates to the purchase or sale of the Company’s securities.

10 The Settling Parties acknowledge, and the Settlement Class Members shall be

11 deemed by operation of the Final Judgment to have acknowledged, that the

12 foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and is a key element of the

13 Settlement of which this release is a part.

14

3. The Proof of Claim and Release to be executed by the Settlement

15 Class Members shall release all Settled Claims against the Released Persons and

16 shall be substantially in the form and content contained in Exhibit A-3 to the

17 Preliminary Approval Order attached hereto as Exhibit A.

18

4. Pursuant to the Order and Final Judgment, upon the Effective

19 Date of this Settlement, Defendants shall release and forever discharge each and

20 every one of the Settled Defendants’ Claims, and shall forever be enjoined from

21 prosecuting the Settled Defendants’ Claims as against any of the Lead and Named

22 Plaintiffs, Settlement Class Members, or their attorneys, including, but not limited

23 to, claims for malicious prosecution or sanctions.

24

C. THE SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION

25

1. Subject to the terms of this Stipulation, Ambow shall pay or

26 cause to be paid the sum of U.S.$1,500,000 (One and One Half Million U.S.

27 Dollars) into the Escrow Account as provided in this paragraph. The sum of

28

15

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 17: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 17 of 93 Page ID

#:2015

1 U.S.$100,000 (One Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars) shall be paid into the Escrow

2 Account within ten (10) business days after the Court issues the Preliminary

3 Approval Order. The balance of U.S.$1,400,000 (One Million and Four Hundred

4 Thousand U.S. Dollars) shall be paid into the Escrow Account within ninety (90)

5 business days after the Court issues the Preliminary Approval Order. If Lead

6 Plaintiff’s Counsel has not provided all required funding information and a tax

7 identification number before the Court issues the Preliminary Approval Order, the

8 ten (10) days and ninety (90) days referenced in this paragraph shall not begin to

9 run until Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel provides the required funding information and

10 tax identification number.

11

2. The Gross Settlement Fund, net of any Taxes (as defined below)

12 on the income thereof and any Tax Expenses (as defined below), shall be used to

13 pay: (i) the Notice and Administration Expenses as authorized by this Stipulation;

14 (ii) Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses authorized by the Court; (iii) any Award to Lead

15 Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs authorized by the Court; and (iv) other fees and

16 expenses authorized by the Court. The balance of the Gross Settlement Fund

17 remaining after the above payments shall be the Net Settlement Fund, which shall

18 be distributed to the Authorized Claimants in accordance with this Stipulation.

19

D. THE ESCROW AGENT

20

1. Any sums required to be held in escrow hereunder shall be held

21 by the Escrow Agent for the benefit of the Lead Plaintiff, Named Plaintiffs and the

22 Settlement Class until they are distributed or returned pursuant to this Stipulation

23 and/or further order of the Court.

24

2. Subject to the further Order(s) and/or directions as may be made

25 by the Court, or as provided in the Stipulation, the Escrow Agent is authorized to

26 execute such transactions as are consistent with the terms of the Stipulation.

27

28

16

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 18: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 18 of 93 Page ID

#:2016

1

3. Until the date the Order and Final Judgment is entered, all

2 payments made from the Gross Settlement Fund shall require the signature of an

3 authorized representative of both the Escrow Agent and Defendants’ counsel.

4 After the Order and Final Judgment is entered, a signature of a Defendants’

5 counsel authorized representative is not required.

6

4. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed to be in

7 custodia legis and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court until such

8 time as the funds shall be distributed or returned pursuant to this Stipulation and/or

9 further order of the Court. Other than amounts disbursed for providing notice to

10 the Settlement Class, customary administration costs, and Taxes and Tax

11 Expenses, and the Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses (which shall be paid to Lead

12 Plaintiff’s Counsel within two business days after the Court executes an order

13 awarding such fees and expenses), the Settlement Fund shall not be distributed

14 until the Effective Date.

15

5. The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Gross Settlement Fund,

16 or any portion thereof, except as provided in this Stipulation, upon Order of the

17 Court, or with the written agreement of Defendants’ counsel.

18

6. The Escrow Agent shall invest any funds in excess of

19 US$150,000 in short-term United States Treasury Securities (or a mutual fund

20 invested solely in such instruments) backed by the Full Faith & Credit of the

21 United States Government or an Agency thereof, or fully insured by the United

22 States Government or an Agency thereof and shall reinvest the proceeds of these

23 instruments as they mature in similar instruments at their then-current market rates.

24 Any funds held in escrow in an amount of less than US$150,000 may be held in a

25 bank account insured to the extent possible by the FDIC. Interest earned on the

26 money deposited into the Escrow Account shall be part of the Gross Settlement

27 Fund. All risks related to the investment of the Gross Settlement Fund in

28

17

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 19: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 19 of 93 Page ID

#:2017

1 accordance with the investment guidelines set forth in this paragraph shall be

2 by the Gross Settlement Fund.

3

7. The Notice and Administration Expenses shall be paid from the

4 Gross Settlement Fund. In order to pay Notice and Administration Expenses,

5 US$100,000 shall be withdrawn from the Gross Settlement Fund and deposited

6 into a Notice and Administration Account following entry of the Preliminary

7 Approval Order. Any monies from the Notice and Administration Fund that

8 remain after administration shall be returned to the Net Settlement Fund for

9 distribution to Class Members. The Notice and Administration Account may be

10 drawn upon by Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel for Notice and Administration Expenses

11 only after Court approval for each specific payment. The Notice and

12 Administration Account shall be administered solely by the Escrow Agent. Any

13 taxes or other expenses incurred in connection with the Notice and Administration

14 Account shall be paid from the Notice and Administration Account or from the

15 remainder of the Gross Settlement Fund. Defendants and the Released Parties

16 shall not have any obligation for payment of taxes or other expenses associated

17 with the Notice and Administration Account. Notice and Administration Expenses

18 in excess of US$100,000 shall not be paid out of the Gross Settlement Fund until

19 after the Effective Date. In no event shall an amount more than the Settlement

20 Amount be paid under this Stipulation, and in no event shall Defendants be

21 responsible to pay any amount under this Stipulation, except as expressly provided

22 herein.

23

8. Defendants shall have access to all records of the Escrow

24 Account, and upon request made to the Escrow Agent, shall receive copies of all

25 records of disbursements, deposits, and statements of accounts.

26

9. After the Effective Date, Defendants shall have no interest in the

27 Gross Settlement Fund or in the Net Settlement Fund. Defendants and the other

28

18

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 20: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 20 of 93 Page ID

#:2018

1 Released Parties shall not be liable for the loss of any portion of the Gross

2 Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund, nor have any liability, obligation, or

3 responsibility for the payment of claims, taxes, legal fees, or any other expenses

4 payable from the Gross Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund.

5

E. ADMINISTRATION AND CALCULATION OF CLAIMS, FINAL

6

AWARDS, AND DISTRIBUTION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND

7

1. The Claims Administrator, subject to such supervision and

8 direction of the Court as may be necessary or as circumstances may require, shall

9 administer and calculate the claims that shall be allowed and oversee distribution

10 of the Net Settlement Fund, under the supervision of Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, and

11 subject to appeal to, and jurisdiction of, the Court. Defendants shall have no

12 liability, obligation, or responsibility for the administration of the Gross Settlement

13 Fund or Net Settlement Fund, or for the distribution of the Gross Settlement Fund

14 or the Net Settlement Fund.

15

2. Except as otherwise provided below, on and after the Effective

16 Date, the Gross Settlement Fund shall be applied as follows:

17 a. To the extent not paid from the Notice and Administration

18 Account, to pay following an order of the Court approving any such payment, the

19 expenses incurred in connection with providing notice to Settlement Class

20 Members, administering and distributing the Net Settlement Fund to Settlement

21 Class Members, processing Proofs of Claim, processing requests for exclusion,

22 escrow fees and costs, and any applicable taxes;

23

b. Subject to the approval and further order(s) of the Court, the

24 Net Settlement Fund shall be allocated to Authorized Claimants as set forth in

25 paragraph G. below.

26 c. After the Claims Administrator calculates the recognized

27 losses of each Authorized Claimant, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall file a motion

28

19

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 21: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 21 of 93 Page ID

#:2019

distribution of the Settlement Fund with the Court listing each Authorized

Claimant, the amount of each claim that Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel believes should

be allocated and distributed to each such Authorized Claimant, accounting for all

Notice and Administration Expenses, and requesting Court approval to distribute

the Net Settlement Fund to the Authorized Claimants and pay any further Notice

and Administration expenses.

3. Each Settlement Class Member wishing to participate in the

Settlement shall be required to submit a Proof of Claim and Release (in

9 substantially the form set forth in Exhibit A-3 hereto, which inter alia releases all

10 Settled Claims against all Released Parties), signed under penalty of perjury by the

11 beneficial owner(s) of the securities that are the subject of the Proof of Claim and

12 Release, or by someone with documented authority to sign for the beneficial

13 owners and supported by such documents as specified in the instructions

14 accompanying the Proof of Claim and Release.

15

4. All Proofs of Claim must be postmarked or received within the

16 time prescribed in the Preliminary Approval Order unless otherwise ordered by the

17 Court. Any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a properly completed

18 Proof of Claim within such period as shall be authorized by the Court shall be

19 forever barred from receiving any payments pursuant to this Stipulation or from

20 the Net Settlement Fund (unless Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel in its discretion deems

21 such late filing to be a minor formal or technical defect, or unless by Order of the

22 Court a later submitted Proof of Claim by such Settlement Class Member is

23 approved), but will in all other respects be subject to the provisions of this

24 Stipulation and Order and Final Judgment, including, without limitation, the

25 release of the Settled Claims and dismissal of the Litigation. Provided that it is

26 received before the motion for the Settlement Class Distribution Order is filed, a

27 Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when posted if received

28

20

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 22: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 22 of 93 Page ID

#:2020

1 with a postmark indicated on the envelope and if mailed by first-class mail and

2 addressed in accordance with the instructions thereon. In all other cases, the Proof

3 of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when actually received by the

4 Claims Administrator.

5

5. Each Proof of Claim shall be submitted to the Claims

6 Administrator who shall determine, under the supervision of Lead Plaintiff’s

7 Counsel, in accordance with this Stipulation and any applicable orders of the

8 Court, the extent, if any, to which each claim shall be allowed, subject to appeal to

9 the Court.

10

6. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall have the right, but not the

11 obligation, to waive what they deem to be minor formal or technical defects in any

12 Proofs of Claim filed in the interest of achieving substantial justice.

13

7. Proofs of Claim that do not meet the filing requirements may be

14 rejected. Prior to rejection of a Proof of Claim, the Claims Administrator shall

15 communicate with the Claimant in order to remedy curable deficiencies in the

16 Proof of Claim submitted. The Claims Administrator, under the supervision of

17 Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, shall notify, in a timely fashion and in writing, all

18 Claimants whose Proofs of Claim it proposes to reject in whole or in part, setting

19 forth the reasons thereof, and shall indicate in such notice that the Claimant whose

20 claims are to be rejected has the right to review by the Court if the Claimant so

21 desires and complies with the requirement of subparagraph (8) below.

22

8. If any Claimant whose claim has been rejected in whole or in

23 desires to contest such rejection, the Claimant must, within twenty (20) days after

24 the date of mailing of the notice required by subparagraph (7) above, serve upon

25 the Claims Administrator a notice and statement of reasons indicating the

26 Claimant’s ground for contesting the rejection along with any supporting

27 documentation, and requesting a review thereof by the Court. If a dispute

28

21

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 23: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 23 of 93 Page ID

#:2021

concerning a claim cannot be otherwise resolved, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall

2

3

4

5

6

7

thereafter present the request for review to the Court.

9. The administrative determination of the Claims Administrator

accepting and rejecting claims shall be presented to the Court, on notice to

Defendants’ Counsel, for approval by the Court in the Settlement Class

Distribution Order.

10. Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the

jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the Claimant’s claim, and the claim will be

9 subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

10 provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to that Claimant’s

11 status as a Settlement Class Member and the validity and amount of the Claimant’s

12 claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Litigation or Settlement

13 in connection with processing of the Proofs of Claim.

14

11. Payment pursuant to this Stipulation shall be deemed final and

15 conclusive against all Settlement Class Members. All Settlement Class Members

16 whose claims are not approved by the Court shall be barred from participating in

17 distributions from the Net Settlement Fund, but are otherwise bound by all of the

18 terms of the Order and Final Judgment to be entered in the Litigation and the

19 releases provided for herein, and will be barred from bringing any action against

20 the Released Parties arising out of or relating to the Settled Claims.

21

12. All proceedings with respect to the administration, processing,

22 and determination of claims described by this paragraph of this Stipulation and the

23 determination of all controversies relating thereto, including disputed questions of

24 law and fact with respect to the validity of claims, shall be subject to the

25 jurisdiction of the Court.

26

13. The Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed to Authorized

27 Claimants by the Claims Administrator upon application to the Court by Lead

28

22

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 24: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 24 of 93 Page ID

#:2022

Plaintiff’s Counsel for a Settlement Class Distribution Order only after all of the

following having occurred: (i) the Effective Date; (ii) all claims have been

processed, and all Claimants whose claims have been rejected or disallowed, in

whole or in part, have been notified and provided the opportunity to be heard

concerning such rejection or disallowance; (iii) all objections with respect to all

rejected or disallowed claims have been resolved by the Court, and all appeals

therefrom have been resolved or the time therefor has expired; (iv) all matters with

respect to Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, costs, and disbursements have been

9 resolved by the Court, and all appeals therefrom have been resolved or the time

10 therefor has expired; and (v) all costs of administration have been paid.

11

14. If any funds remain in the Net Settlement Fund by reason of

12 uncashed checks or otherwise, then, after the Claims Administrator has made

13 reasonable and diligent efforts to have Settlement Class Members who are entitled

14 to participate in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund cash their distribution

15 checks, any balance remaining in the Net Settlement Fund one (1) year after the

16 initial distribution of such funds shall be re-distributed, after payment of any

17 unpaid costs or fees incurred in administering the Net Settlement Fund for such re-

18 distribution, to Settlement Class Members who have cashed their checks and who

19 would receive at least $10.00 from such re-distribution. If any funds shall remain

20 in the Net Settlement Fund six months after such re-distribution, then such balance

21 shall be contributed to a non-sectarian, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) organization(s)

22 designated by Lead Plaintiffs’ Counsel.

23

15. Before the Effective Date, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall file

24 with the Court a declaration under penalty of perjury describing how notice of the

25 Settlement was given to the Settlement Class and listing the names and addresses

26 of all persons to whom individual notice of the Settlement was mailed.

27

28

23

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 25: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 25 of 93 Page ID

#:2023

1

16. Defendants and the other Released Parties shall have no

2 responsibility for, interest in, or liability whatsoever with respect to the distribution

3 of the Gross Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation,

4 the determination, administration, or calculation of claims, the payment or

5 withholding of Taxes, or any losses incurred in connection therewith. No Person

6 shall have any claim of any kind against the Defendants or the other Released

7 Parties with respect to the matters set forth in paragraph E hereof; and the

8 Settlement Class Members, the Lead Plaintiff, and Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel release

9 the Defendants and the other Released Parties from any and all liability and claims

10 arising from or with respect to the investment or distribution of the Settlement

11 Fund.

12

F. TAX TREATMENT

13

1. The Settling Parties agree to treat the Gross Settlement Fund as

14 being at all times a “qualified settlement fund” within the meaning of Treasury

15 Regulation § 1.468B-1 and Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code, as

16 amended, for the taxable years of the Gross Settlement Fund, beginning with the

17 date it is created. In addition, the Escrow Agent, and, as required, the Settling

18 Parties, shall jointly and timely make such elections as are necessary or advisable

19 to carry out the provisions of this paragraph, including the “relation-back election”

20 (as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-1(j)(2)) back to the earliest permitted date.

21 Such elections shall be made in compliance with the procedures and requirements

22 contained in such regulations. It shall be the responsibility of Lead Plaintiff’s

23 Counsel to timely and properly prepare and deliver the necessary documentation

24 for signature by all necessary parties, and thereafter to cause the appropriate filing

25 to occur.

26

2. For purposes of Section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code, as

27 amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, the “administrator” shall be

28

24

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 26: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 26 of 93 Page ID

#:2024

1 the Escrow Agent. The Escrow Agent shall timely and properly file all tax returns

2 necessary or advisable with respect to the Gross Settlement Fund, and make all

3 required tax payments, including deposits of estimated tax payments in accordance

4 with Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-2(k). Such returns (as well as the election described in

5 paragraph F.1. hereof) shall be consistent with this paragraph and reflect that all

6 taxes (including any interest or penalties) on the income earned by the Gross

7 Settlement Fund shall be paid out of the Gross Settlement Fund as provided in

8 paragraph F.3. hereof.

9

3. All (i) taxes (including any interest or penalties) arising with

10 respect to the income earned by the Gross Settlement Fund, including any taxes or

11 tax detriments that may be imposed upon the Released Parties with respect to any

12 income earned by the Gross Settlement Fund for any period during which the

13 Gross Settlement Fund does not qualify as a qualified settlement fund for Federal

14 or state income tax purposes (“Taxes”); and (ii) expenses and costs incurred in

15 connection with the operation and implementation of this paragraph (including,

16 without limitation, expenses of tax attorneys and/or accountants, and mailing and

17 distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or failing to file) the returns

18 described in this paragraph) (“Tax Expenses”) shall be paid out of the Gross

19 Settlement Fund. In all events, the Released Parties shall have no liability for

20 Taxes or Tax Expenses, and the Escrow Agent, Lead Plaintiff, and Lead Plaintiff’s

21 Counsel agrees to indemnify and hold the Released Parties harmless for Taxes and

22 Tax Expenses. Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be treated as, and

23 considered to be, a cost of administration of the Settlement and shall be timely paid

24 by the Escrow Agent out of the Gross Settlement Fund without prior order from

25 the Court. The Escrow Agent shall be obligated (notwithstanding anything herein

26 to the contrary) to withhold from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds

27 necessary to pay such Taxes and Tax Expenses, including the establishment of

28

25

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 27: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 27 of 93 Page ID

#:2025

1 adequate reserves for any Taxes and Tax Expenses (as well as any amounts that

2 may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg. § 1468B-2(l)(2)). The Released

3 Parties shall have no responsibility or liability for any Taxes or Tax Expenses. The

4 Settling Parties hereto agree to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each other, and

5 their tax attorneys and accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out

6 the provisions of this paragraph.

7

G. ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND

8

1. The Plan of Allocation is based upon Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel’s

9 assessment of the merits and the relative strengths and weaknesses, including

10 recoverable damages, of the claims of the Settlement Class Members.

11

2. Defendants do not and shall not take any position as to the

12 proposed Plan of Allocation, and the proposed Plan of Allocation shall not be used

13 by Defendants in any suit, action, proceeding or dispute as evidence of Plaintiff’s

14 legal assessment of any of the Settled Claims.

15

3. The Released Parties shall have no responsibility for and no

16 obligations or liabilities of any kind whatsoever in connection with the

17 determination, administration, calculation, or payment of claims to Settlement

18 Class Members.

19

4. Defendants shall have no involvement in the solicitation of, or

20 review of Proofs of Claim, or involvement in the administration process itself,

21 which shall be conducted by the Claims Administrator in accordance with this

22 Stipulation and the Order and Final Judgment to be entered by the Court. No

23 Claimant or Authorized Claimant shall have any claim against Defendants or any

24 other Released Party based on, or in any way relating to, the distributions from the

25 Gross Settlement Fund or Net Settlement Fund.

26

5. No Authorized Claimant shall have any claim against Lead

27 Plaintiff’s Counsel or the Claims Administrator based on, or in any way relating to,

28

26

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 28: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 28 of 93 Page ID

#:2026

1 the distributions from the Net Settlement Fund that have been made substantially

2 in accordance with this Stipulation and any applicable orders of the Court.

3

6. Any change in the allocation of the Net Settlement Fund ordered

4 by the Court shall not affect the validity or finality of this Settlement.

5

H. OBLIGATIONS OF AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY OF

6

ESCROW AGENT

7

The Escrow Agent shall not be responsible for the payment of any

8 sums due to Authorized Claimants or other Persons, except to the extent of

9 maintaining account of and properly paying sums as required by this Stipulation to

10 the limited extent that such sums have been delivered into the Escrow Account or

11 Notice and Administration Account as required by this Stipulation. The Escrow

12 Agent shall be liable only for acts of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

13

I. LEAD PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S REQUEST FOR AN AWARD

14

OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES

15

1. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel intends to submit an application to the

16 Court, on notice to counsel for Defendants, for the payment of Attorneys’ Fees and

17 Expenses, including: (i) an award of attorneys’ fees up to one-third of the

18 Settlement Amount; (ii) reimbursement of litigation costs and expenses, plus

19 interest, including fees and expenses of experts, incurred in connection with the

20 prosecution of the Litigation; and (iii) an Award to Lead Plaintiff and the Named

21 Plaintiffs (for reimbursement of time and expenses).

22

2. Any attorneys’ fees and costs and Award to Lead Plaintiff and

23 Named Plaintiffs awarded by the Court shall be paid to Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel

24 from the Gross Settlement Fund within two (2) business days after the Court

25 executes an order awarding such fees and expenses and enters the Judgment. Lead

26 Plaintiff’s Counsel may thereafter allocate the attorneys’ fees among other

27 plaintiffs’ counsel in a manner which Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel in good faith

28

27

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 29: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 29 of 93 Page ID

#:2027

1 believes reflects the contributions of such counsel to the initiation, prosecution,

2 resolution of the Litigation.

3

3. If, and when, as a result of any appeal and/or further proceedings

4 on remand, or successful collateral attack, the Attorneys’ Fee and Expense award

5 is overturned or lowered, or if the settlement is terminated or is not approved by

6 the Court, or if there is an appeal and any order approving the settlement does not

7 become final and binding upon the Class, then, within five (5) business days from

8 receiving notice from Defendants’ counsel or from a court of appropriate

9 jurisdiction, Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall refund to the Settlement Fund such fees

10 and expenses previously paid to them from the Settlement Fund plus interest

11 thereon at the same rate as earned on the Settlement Fund in an amount consistent

12 with such reversal or modification. Each such plaintiffs’ counsel’s law firm

13 receiving fees and expenses, as a condition of receiving such fees and expenses, on

14 behalf of itself and each partner and/or shareholder of it, agrees that the law firm

15 and its partners and/or shareholders are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for

16 the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this paragraph. Without limitation, Lead

17 Plaintiff’s Counsel agrees that the Court may, upon application of Defendants and

18 notice to Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, summarily issue orders including, but not

19 limited to, judgments and attachment orders, and may make appropriate findings of

20 or sanctions for contempt, should such law firm fail timely to repay fees and

21 expenses pursuant to this paragraph.

22

4. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel waives the right to make an additional

23 application or applications for payment from the Gross Settlement Fund for fees

24 and expenses incurred after the Settlement Hearing. The other Settling Parties

25 shall take no position on any application concerning Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel’s

26 request or award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses, or Award to

27 Lead and Named Plaintiffs.

28

28

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 30: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 30 of 93 Page ID

#:2028

1

5. The procedure for and the allowance or disallowance by the

2 Court of any applications by Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel for attorneys’ fees and

3 expenses, or the expenses of the Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs, to be paid ou

4 of the Gross Settlement Fund, are not part of the settlement set forth in the

5 Stipulation, and are to be considered by the Court separately from the Court’s

6 consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the settlement set

7 forth in the Stipulation, and any order or proceeding relating to Lead Plaintiff’s

8 Counsel’s application for attorneys’ fees and expenses, or the Lead Plaintiff’s and

9 Named Plaintiffs’ expense application, or any appeal from any order relating

10 thereto or reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel

11 the Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment approving the

12 Stipulation and the settlement of the Litigation set forth therein.

13

6. Defendants and the other Released Parties shall have no

14 responsibility for any payment of attorneys’ fees and expenses to Lead Plaintiff’s

15 Counsel over and above payment out of the Settlement Fund.

16

J. THE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ORDER

17

1. Promptly after execution of this Stipulation, Lead Plaintiff shall

18 submit the Stipulation together with its exhibits to the Court and shall apply for

19 entry of a Preliminary Approval Order in connection with settlement proceedings

20 substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit A, providing for, among other

21 things, preliminary approval of the Settlement and notice to the Settlement Class o

22 the Settlement Hearing. The Preliminary Approval Order (Exhibit A hereto) to be

23 submitted to the Court shall contain exhibits substantially in the form set forth in:

24 (i) the Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”) (Exhibit

25 A-1 to the Preliminary Approval Order); (ii) the Summary Notice of Pendency

26 and Settlement of Class Action (“Summary Notice”) (Exhibit A-2 to the

27

28

29

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 31: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 31 of 93 Page ID

#:2029

1 Preliminary Approval Order); and (iii) the Proof of Claim and Release (Exhibit A-

2 3 to the Preliminary Approval Order).

3

2. Defendants and other Released Parties are not liable or

4 responsible for the method of, or representations made in, the Notice or the

5 Summary Notice.

6

K. ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED BY THE

7

COURT APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT

8

1. Lead Plaintiff shall seek to have the Court enter an Order and

9 Final Judgment substantially in the form of Exhibit B hereto.

10

L. CONDITIONS OF SETTLEMENT

11

1. The Effective Date of the Settlement shall be conditioned upon

12 the occurrence of ALL of the following events:

13 a. The Court shall enter the Preliminary Approval Order in all

14 material respects, as required by paragraph J. above;

15

b. No party shall have exercised within the required time

16 period any right to terminate the Settlement as permitted by paragraph M below;

17 c. The Court shall enter the Order and Final Judgment in all

18 material respects, as required by paragraph K. above;

19

d. The Court’s Order and Final Judgment, substantially in the

20 form of Exhibit B, shall have become “Final,” as defined in paragraph A.9.; and

21 e. The sum of US$1,500,000 (One and One Half Million U.S.

22 Dollars) shall have been paid, as set forth in paragraph C above.

23

2. Upon occurrence of ALL of the events referenced in paragraph

24 L.1. above, Lead Plaintiff shall have, and each and all of the members of the

25 Settlement Class shall hereby be deemed to have, and by operation of the Order

26 and Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever, released, settled, and

27 discharged, in accordance with the terms of paragraph B. above, the Released

28

30

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 32: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 32 of 93 Page ID

#:2030

1 Parties from and with respect to the Settled Claims, whether or not such members

2 of the Settlement Class execute and deliver a Proof of Claim.

3

3. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Stipulation,

4 Defendants reserve their indemnification and advancement rights and defenses

5 under Ambow’s bylaws, Ambow’s articles of incorporation, their agreements,

6 Delaware law, California law, Federal or any other applicable authority.

7

4. Upon occurrence of ALL of the events referenced in paragraph

8 L.1. above, the obligation of the Escrow Agent to return funds from the Gross

9 Settlement Fund to Defendants pursuant to paragraph M.4. or any other provision

10 hereof shall be absolutely and forever extinguished.

11

M. RIGHTS OF TERMINATION AND EFFECTS THEREOF

12

1. Defendants and Lead Plaintiff shall each have the right to

13 terminate the Settlement and this Stipulation by providing written notice of their

14 election to do so (“Termination Notice”) to all other counsel of the Settling Parties

15 within thirty (30) days after the date on which any of the following occurs:

16 a. the Court issues an order declining to enter the Preliminary

17 Approval Order in any material respect;

18

b. the Court issues an order declining to approve this

19 Stipulation or any material part of it;

20 c. the Court declines to enter the Order and Final Judgment in

21 all material respects as required by paragraph K. above;

22

d. the Order and Final Judgment is modified or reversed in any

23 material respect by a Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court; or

24 e. in the event that the Court enters an order and final i

25 in a form other than that provided above (an “Alternative Judgment”) and none of

26 the Settling Parties elects to terminate this Settlement, the date that such

27

28

31

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 33: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 33 of 93 Page ID

#:2031

Alternative Judgment is modified or reversed in any material respect by a Court of

Appeals or the Supreme Court.

2. If prior to the Settlement Hearing, (i) Persons who otherwise

would be Settlement Class Members have filed with the Court valid and timely

requests for exclusion (“Requests for Exclusion”) from the Settlement Class in

accordance with the provisions of the Preliminary Approval Order and the notice

given pursuant thereto, and such Persons in the aggregate purchased stock during

the Settlement Class Period in an amount greater than the amounts specified in a

9 separate Supplemental Agreement between the parties (the “Supplemental

10 Agreement”), or (ii) Persons file lawsuits alleging fraud in connection with the

11 purchase of more than the number of Ambow shares specified in the Supplemental

12 Agreement, then Defendants shall have the option to terminate this Stipulation and

13 Settlement in strict accordance with the requirements and procedures set forth in

14 the Supplemental Agreement (“Opt-out Termination Option”). The Supplemental

15 Agreement shall not be filed with the Court unless and until a dispute among the

16 parties concerning its interpretation or application arises, and in that event, the

17 Supplemental Agreement shall be filed and maintained by the Court under seal.

18 Copies of all Requests for Exclusion received, together with copies of all written

19 revocations of Requests for Exclusion, shall be delivered to Defendants’ counsel

20 no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Settlement Hearing. The required

21 procedure for and consequences of exercising an Opt-out Termination Option are

22 as follows:

23 a. To exercise the Opt-out Termination Option, a Defendant

24 must serve written notice, signed by the party’s respective counsel, upon counsel

25 for the other Settling Parties, not less than seven (7) days before the Settlement

26 Hearing; and

27

28

32

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

2

3

4

5

6

7

Page 34: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 34 of 93 Page ID

#:2032

1

b. If a Defendant exercises the Opt-out Termination Option as

2 provided herein, this Stipulation shall be null and void, and the provisions of

3 paragraph M. hereof shall apply.

4

3. If the Settlement Amount payable pursuant to paragraph C.1. of

5 this Stipulation is not timely paid (and payment is not excused pursuant to the

6 express terms of this Stipulation), the Lead Plaintiff, in its sole discretion, may

7 elect, at any time prior to the Court’s entering the Order and Final Judgment, to (i)

8 terminate the Settlement by providing written notice to the Settling Parties that

9 Ambow has ten (10) days to pay or caused to be paid the full Settlement Amount;

10 or (ii) enforce the terms of the Settlement and this Stipulation and seek a judgment

11 effecting the terms herein.

12

4. Upon termination of the Stipulation pursuant to the terms of the

13 Stipulation, the Escrow Agent shall refund the Gross Settlement Fund, less

14 amounts expended for Notice and Administration Expenses to the Settlement Class

15 pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation, to Defendants within ten (10) business

16 days thereafter (the “Returned Settlement Amount”).

17

5. If this Stipulation is terminated pursuant to its terms, and at the

18 request of any Defendant or Lead Plaintiff, the Escrow Agent or his designee shall

19 apply for any tax refund owed on the Gross Settlement Fund and pay the proceeds,

20 after deduction of any fees and expenses incurred in connection with such

21 application(s) for refund, to Defendants.

22

6. If this Stipulation is terminated pursuant to its terms, all of the

23 Settling Parties shall be restored to their respective positions prior to the execution

24 of this Stipulation, and they shall proceed in all respects as if this Stipulation had

25 not been executed and the related orders had not been entered, preserving in that

26 event all of their respective claims and defenses in the Litigation. In such event,

27 the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of paragraphs D.5.,

28

33

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 35: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 35 of 93 Page ID

#:2033

1 F.1-3., H, M.5-7., N.11-13., N.15., and N.18. shall have no further force and effect

2 with respect to the Settling Parties and shall not be used in this Litigation or in any

3 other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by the Court

4 in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated, nunc

5

tunc .

6

7. No order of the Court or modification or reversal on appeal of

7 any order of the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation or the amount of any

8 attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and interest awarded by the Court to any of

9 Plaintiffs’ Counsel or expenses to the Lead Plaintiff or awards to Plaintiffs shall

10 constitute grounds for cancellation or termination of the Stipulation.

11

N. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

12

1. The Settling Parties: (i) acknowledge that it is their intent to

13 consummate the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation; (ii) agree to

14 cooperate to the extent necessary to effectuate and implement all terms and

15 conditions of this Stipulation; and (iii) agree to exercise their best efforts and to act

16 in good faith to accomplish the foregoing terms and conditions of the Stipulation.

17

2. The Settling Parties acknowledge and warrant as follows:

18 a. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

19 represents that they have carefully read and fully understand this Stipulation and i

20 final and binding effect;

21

b. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

22 represents that they have the right, legal capacity, power and authority to enter i

23 this Stipulation and to perform their obligations hereunder, without the conse

24 approval, or authorization of any person, board, entity, tribunal, or other regulat

25 or governmental authority;

26 c. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

27 represents that the execution and delivery of this Stipulation and the performanc

28

34

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 36: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 36 of 93 Page ID

#:2034

1 of each and every obligation in this Stipulation do not and will not result in

2 breach of or constitute a default under, or require any consent under, any duty

3 relationship, contract, agreement, covenant, promise, guarantee, obligation or

4 instrument to which the executing Settling Party is a party or by which the

5 executing Settling Party is bound or affected;

6

d. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling Parties

7 represents that there is no demand for monetary, non-monetary, or injunctive relief,

8 or any civil, criminal, administrative, or arbitration proceeding for monetary, non

9 monetary, or injunctive relief known or suspected to exist against them that would

10 affect this Stipulation or their ability to enter into, execute or perform each and

11 every obligation in this Stipulation.

12 e. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

13 represents that no representations or promises of any kind or character have be

14 made by any other Settling Party, Released Party, or anyone else to induce t

15 execution of this Stipulation except as expressly provided herein;

16

f. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling Parti

17 represents that this Stipulation is fair and is executed voluntarily, with fu

18 knowledge of the consequences and implications of the obligations

19 herein;

20 g. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

21 represents that this Stipulation is not the result of any fraud, duress, or undu

22 influence, and that they have not assigned, transferred, or conveyed or purported to

23 assign, transfer, or convey, voluntarily, involuntarily or by operation of law, any o

24 all of their respective rights and claims;

25

h. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling Partie

26 represents that they have had the opportunity to be represented by counsel of thei

27 choice that is duly licensed to practice in the State of California throughout th

28

35

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 37: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 37 of 93 Page ID

#:2035

1 negotiations which preceded the execution of this Stipulation and in

2 with the preparation and execution of this Stipulation; and

3

i. By executing this Stipulation, each of the Settling P

4 represents that they have been afforded sufficient time and opportunity to re

5 this Stipulation with advisors and counsel of their choice.

6

3. All of the exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated by

7 reference as though fully set forth herein.

8

4. This Stipulation may be amended or modified only by a written

9 instrument signed by counsel for Defendants, or their successors-in-interest.

10

5. This Stipulation, the exhibits attached hereto, and the agreements

11 referred to herein constitute the entire agreement between Plaintiffs, on the one

12 hand, and Defendants, on the other hand, and no representations, warranties, or

13 inducements have been made by Plaintiffs to Defendants or Defendants to

14 Plaintiffs concerning this Stipulation or its exhibits, other than the representations,

15 warranties, and covenants contained and memorialized in such documents.

16

6. Except as otherwise provided herein, each Settling Party shall

17 bear its own costs. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses,

18 subject to Court approval, shall be paid only out of the Gross Settlement Fund, and

19 Defendants and the other Released Parties shall have no obligation with respect to

20 the payment of said Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses.

21

7. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, on behalf of the Settlement Class, is

22 expressly authorized to take all appropriate action required or permitted to be ta

23 by the Settlement Class pursuant to this Stipulation to effectuate its terms and is

24 also expressly authorized to enter into any modifications or amendments to this

25 Stipulation on behalf of the Settlement Class.

26

8. The persons signing this Stipulation represent that they are

27 authorized to do so on behalf of their respective clients.

28

36

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 38: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 38 of 93 Page ID

#:2036

1

9. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more original,

2 photocopied, or facsimile counterparts. All executed counterparts and each of

3 them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument. The Settling Parties shall

4 exchange among themselves original signed counterparts of this Stipulation, and a

5 complete set of executed counterparts of this Stipulation shall be filed with the

6 Court.

7

10. This Stipulation shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit

8 of, the successors, assigns, executors, administrators, heirs, and legal

9 representatives of the Settling Parties. No assignment shall relieve any party

10 hereto of any obligations hereunder.

11

11. All terms of this Stipulation and all exhibits hereto shall be

12 governed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California without

13 regard to its rules of conflicts of law, except to the extent that federal law requires

14 that federal law governs, and in accordance with the laws of the United States.

15

12. The Lead and Named Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and

16 each member of the Settlement Class, and the other Settling Parties hereby

17 irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of the Court for any suit, action, proceeding,

18 or dispute arising out of or relating to this Stipulation, the applicability of this

19 Stipulation, or the enforcement of this Stipulation. The administration and

20 consummation of the Settlement as embodied in this Stipulation shall be under the

21 authority of the Court, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of

22 entering orders providing for awards of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses to Lead

23 Plaintiff’s Counsel, Awards to Lead Plaintiff, and enforcing the terms of this

24 Stipulation.

25

13. All agreements made and orders entered during the course of

26 the Litigation relating to the confidentiality of information shall survive this

27 Stipulation.

28

37

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 39: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 39 of 93 Page ID

#:2037

1

14. None of the Settling Parties shall be considered to be the drafter

2 of this Stipulation or any provision hereof for purposes of any statute, case law, or

3 rule of interpretation or construction that would or might cause any provision to be

4 construed against the drafter hereof. Because of the arm’s-length negotiations that

5 preceded the execution of this Stipulation, all Settling Parties have contributed

6 substantially and materially to the preparation of this Stipulation.

7

15. Neither this Stipulation, nor the fact of the Settlement, is

8 admission or concession by any Defendant or any other Released Party of

9 liability or wrongdoing whatsoever. This Stipulation shall not constitute a finding

10 of the validity or invalidity of any claims in the Litigation or of any wrongdoing by

11 any Defendant named therein or any other Released Party. This Stipulation, the

12 fact of settlement, the settlement proceedings, the settlement negotiations, and any

13 related documents, shall not be used or construed as an admission of any fault

14 liability, or wrongdoing by any Defendant or any other Released Party in any civil

15 criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or othe

16 tribunal. The Defendants and any other Released Party may file the Stipulation

17 and/or Judgment in any action that may be brought against them to support a

18 defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel

19 release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or any other theory o

20 claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or counterclaim.

21

16. The Settling Parties intend the Settlement to be a final and

22 complete resolution of all claims and disputes asserted or that could be asserted by

23 the Settlement Class Members against the Released Parties with respect to the

24 Settled Claims. Accordingly, unless the Court’s Order and Final Judgmen

25 approving the Settlement does not become Final, the Settling Parties agree not

26 assert in any forum that the Litigation was brought by Lead Plaintiff or defend

27 by Defendants in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. Additionally, the Settli

28

38

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 40: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 40 of 93 Page ID

#:2038

1 Parties shall not assert any claims of any violation of Rule 11 of the Federal

2 of Civil Procedure relating to the prosecution, defense, or settlement of

3 Litigation. The Settling Parties agree that the amount paid and the other terms o

4 the Settlement were negotiated at arm’s-length in good faith by the Settling Parties

5 and reflect a settlement that was reached voluntarily after consultation with

6 experienced legal counsel. The Settling Parties reserve their right to rebut, in

7 manner that such party determines to be appropriate, any contention made in an

8 public forum that the Litigation was brought or defended in bad faith or without

9 reasonable basis.

10

17. The headings in this Stipulation are used for purposes

11 convenience and ease of reference only and are not meant to have any legal

12 nor are they intended to influence the construction of this Stipulation in any way.

13

18. The waiver of one Settling Party of any breach of this Stipulati

14 by any other Settling Party shall not be deemed a waiver of any other breach of this

15 Stipulation. The provisions of this Stipulation may not be waived except by a

16 writing signed by the affected Settling Party or counsel for that Settling Party. No

17 failure or delay on the part of any Settling Party in exercising any right, remedy

18 power, or privilege under this Stipulation shall operate as a waiver thereof or o

19 any other right, remedy, power, or privilege of such Settling Party under this

20 Stipulation; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power, or

21 privilege under this Stipulation on the part of either Settling Party operate as a

22 waiver thereof or of any other right, remedy, power, or privilege of such Settling

23 Party under this Stipulation, or preclude further exercise thereof or the exercise o

24 any other right, remedy, power, or privilege.

25

19. The Settling Parties agree that nothing contained in thi

26 Stipulation shall cause any Settling Party to be the agent or legal representative o

27 the other Settling Party for any purpose whatsoever, nor shall this Stipulation b

28

39

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 41: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 41 of 93 Page ID

#:2039

1 deemed to create any form of business organization between the Settling Parties,

2 nor is any Settling Party granted any right or authority to assume or create any

3 obligation or responsibility on behalf of the other Settling Party, nor shall either

4 Settling Party be in any way liable for any debt of the other Settling Party as a

5 result of this Stipulation except as explicitly set forth herein.

6

7

8 THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

40

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 42: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 42 of 93 Page ID ii #:2040

20. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Settling Parties

intending to be legally bound hereby, have caused this Stipulation to be ex

by their duly authorized attorneys, as of the day and year first above written.

THE ROSE LAW FIRM, P.A.

Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. 355 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 714-2860

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

— giatt'ail'qrp Stephei( D. Hibbard Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111 (415)616-1100

Attorneys for Defendants Ambow Education Holding, Ltd, Jin Huang, Paul Chow and Shasha Chang

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

41

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 43: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2 -cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 43 of 93 Page ID #:2041

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP

Seth Aronson 400 South Hope Street, 181h Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 430-6000

Attorneys for Defendants Mark Robert Harris, Daniel Phillips and Tao Sun

42

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement--No. CV 12-5062-PSG (AJW)

Page 44: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 44 of 93 Page ID #:2042

EXHIBIT A

Page 45: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 45 of 93 Page ID

#:2043

1

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 WESTERN DIVISION 5

6 BYRON BROWN, TIANQING ZHANG, 7 AND ROBERTO SALAZAR,

8 I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

9

10 Plaintiffs,

11 vs. 12

AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD., 13 JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, XUEJUN 14 XIE, MARK ROBERT HARRIS, LISA LO,

DANIEL PHILLIPS, TAO SUN AND 15

SASHA CHANG, 16

17 Defendants.

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

CASE No.: 12-cv-5062 PSG (AJW)

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

Hearing Date: TBD Hearing Time: TBD Courtroom: 880 Judge: Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez Compl. Filed: June 11, 2012 Trial Date: N/A

0 28

Page 46: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 46 of 93 Page ID

#:2044

1

WHEREAS, a consolidated action is pending before this Court styled Brown

2 v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd., et al. , 12-cv-5062-PSG (AJW) (the

3 “Litigation”);

4

WHEREAS, (i) lead plaintiff Tianqing Zhang (“Lead Plaintiff”) and named

5 plaintiffs Byron Brown and Roberto Salazar (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) on behalf of

6 themselves and the putative class, and (ii) Ambow Education Holding Ltd. 7 (“Ambow”), Jin Huang, Paul Chow, Mark Robert Harris, Daniel Phillips, Tao Sun, 8 Lisa Lo, and Shasha Chang (collectively, “Defendants”) have entered, by and 9 through their respective counsel, into a settlement of the claims asserted in the

10 Litigation, the terms of which are set forth in a Stipulation and Agreement of 11

Settlement, dated October 24, 2014 (the “Stipulation”), which is subject to review 12

under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and which, together with the 13

exhibits annexed thereto, set forth the terms and conditions for the proposed 14

settlement of the claims alleged in the Third Amended Complaint (the 15

“Complaint”) filed in the Litigation; and the Court having read and considered the 16

17 Stipulation, the proposed Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class

18 Action (“Notice”), the proposed Summary Notice of Pendency and Proposed Class

19 Action Settlement (“Summary Notice”), the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net

20 Settlement Fund among Settlement Class Members, the proposed form of the Proof

21 of Claim and Release (“Proof of Claim”), the proposed form of Order and Final

22 Judgment, and submissions made relating thereto, and finding that substantial and

23 sufficient grounds exist for entering this Order; and

24 WHEREAS, all defined terms herein have the same meanings as set forth in

25 the Stipulation.

26 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this

day of

27 2014, that:

28

Page 47: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 47 of 93 Page ID

#:2045

1

1. The Court does hereby preliminarily approve the Stipulation and the

2 settlement set forth therein, subject to further consideration at the Settlement

3 Hearing described below.

4

2. Pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil

5 Procedure and for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Court preliminarily

6 certifies a Settlement Class, defined as: “All persons or entities who purchased or 7 otherwise acquired Ambow’s American Depository Shares (“ADS”) during the 8 period from its initial public offering on August 5, 2010, through and including 9 February 27, 2013, and held such ADS shares through at least May 16, 2012.”

10 Excluded from the Settlement Class are:

11 (a) Defendants, present and former officers and/or directors of

12 Ambow and the members of such persons’ immediate families and their legal

13 representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, any entity in which any excluded

14 person has or had a controlling interest, Ambow’s predecessors; and

15 (b) Those persons who file valid and timely requests for exclusion

16

17 in accordance with this Order; and

18 (c) Any persons who have separately filed actions against one or

19 more of Defendants, based in whole or in part on any claim arising out of or

20 relating to any of the alleged acts, omissions, misrepresentations, facts, events,

21 matters, transactions or occurrences referred to in the Litigation or otherwise

22 alleged, asserted or contended in the Litigation.

23 3. The Court finds, preliminarily and for purposes of the Settlement

24 only, that the prerequisites for a class action under Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the

25 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied in that: (a) the number of

26 Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all members of the

27 Settlement Class is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common

28 2

Page 48: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 48 of 93 Page ID

#:2046

to the Settlement Class Members; (c) the claims of the Lead and Named Plaintiffs

2 are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class they seek to represent; (d) the

3 Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent the

4 interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law and fact common to the

5 members of the Settlement Class predominate over any questions affecting only

6 individual members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a class action is superior to 7 other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the Litigation.

4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 9 preliminarily and for the purposes of the Settlement only, Lead Plaintiff and

10 Named Plaintiffs are certified as the class representatives on behalf of the 11

Settlement Class and the Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel previously selected by Lead 12

Plaintiff and appointed by the Court is hereby appointed as Lead Counsel for the 13

Settlement Class. 14

5. A hearing (the “Settlement Hearing”) pursuant to Federal Rule of 15

Civil Procedure 23(e) shall be held before the Court on _____________ 20__ at 16

17 .m. for the following purposes:

18 (a) to finally determine whether the Litigation satisfies the

19 applicable prerequisites for class action treatment under Federal Rules of Civil

20 Procedure 23(a) and (b);

21 (b) to finally determine whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable

22 and adequate to the Settlement Class and should be approved by the Court;

23 (c) to finally determine whether the Order and Final Judgment as

24 provided under the Stipulation should be entered, dismissing the Complaint on the

25 merits and with prejudice, and to determine whether the release by the Settlement

26 Class of the Released Parties as set forth in the Stipulation, should be ordered,

27 along with a permanent injunction barring efforts to bring any claims extinguished

28

Page 49: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 49 of 93 Page ID

#:2047

1 by the release;

2

(d) to finally determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation

3 for the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable and should be

4 approved by the Court;

5

(e) to consider the application of Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel for an

6 award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses and reimbursement of expenses to Lead 7 Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs;

8 (f) to consider any Settlement Class Member’s objections to the 9 Settlement, whether submitted previously in writing or presented orally at the

10 Settlement Hearing by Settlement Class Members (or by counsel on their behalf); 11

and

12 (g) to rule upon such other matters as the Court may deem

13 appropriate.

14

6. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing to a 15

later date and to approve the Settlement with or without modification and with or 16

17 without further notice of any kind. The Court further reserves the right to enter its

18 Order and Final Judgment approving the Settlement and dismissing the Complaint,

19 on the merits and with prejudice, regardless of whether it has approved the Plan of

20 Allocation or awarded Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses.

21 7. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement with such

22 modifications as may be agreed upon or consented to by the Settling Parties and

23 without further notice to the Settlement Class where to do so would not impair

24 Settlement Class Members’ rights in a manner inconsistent with Federal Rule of

25 Civil Procedure 23 and due process of law.

26 8. The Court approves the form, substance and requirements of (a) the

27 Notice, (b) the Summary Notice, and (c) the Proof of Claim, all of which are

4 28

Page 50: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 50 of 93 Page ID

#:2048

1 exhibits to the Stipulation.

2

9. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel has the authority to enter into the Stipulation

3 on behalf of the Settlement Class and is authorized to act on behalf of the

4 Settlement Class Members with respect to all acts or consents required by or that

5 may be given pursuant to the Stipulation or such other acts that are reasonably

6 necessary to consummate the Settlement.

7

10. Strategic Claims Services is appointed and approved as the Claims 8 Administrator for the Settlement to supervise and administer the notice procedure 9 and the processing of claims.

10 11. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall 11

cause the Notice and the Proof of Claim, substantially in the forms annexed hereto, 12

to be mailed, by first-class mail, postage prepaid, within twenty-eight (28) calendar 13

days of the entry of this Order, to all Settlement Class Members who can be 14

identified with reasonable effort by the Claims Administrator. 15

12. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel are authorized to establish a Notice and 16

17 Administration Account (as defined in the Stipulation) of US$100,000 (One

18 Hundred Thousand Dollars) to be used for reasonable out-of-pocket costs in

19 connection with providing notice of the Settlement to the Settlement Class and for

20 other reasonable out-of-pocket administrative expenses. After the Effective Date,

21 no additional amounts may be transferred from the Gross Settlement Fund to the

22 Notice and Administration Account without further approval by the Court.

23 13. Within twenty (20) calendar days of entry of this Order, Ambow shall

24 provide to the Claims Administrator, in a usable electronic format, transfer records

25 which indicate the legal owners of Ambow ADS currently or during the Settlement

26 Class Period

27 14. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall also

28 5

Page 51: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 51 of 93 Page ID

#:2049

1 make all reasonable efforts to give notice to nominee owners such as brokerage

2 firms and other persons or entities who purchased Ambow ADS during the

3 Settlement Class Period. Such nominee purchasers are directed to forward copies

4 of the Notice and Proof of Claim to their beneficial owners or to provide the

5 Claims Administrator with lists of the names and addresses of the beneficial

6 owners and the Claims Administrator is ordered to send the Notice and Proof of 7 Claim promptly to such beneficial owners. Additional copies of the Notice shall 8 be made available to any record holder requesting same for the purpose of 9 distribution to beneficial owners, and such record holders shall be reimbursed from

10 the Gross Settlement Fund, upon receipt by the Claims Administrator of proper 11

documentation, for the reasonable expense of sending the Notice and Proof of 12

Claim to beneficial owners. 13

15. Lead Plaintiff’s counsel shall, at or before the Settlement Hearing, 14

serve upon Defendants’ Counsel, and file with the Court, proof of mailing of the 15

Notice and Proof of Claim, both to Settlement Class Members and to nominees. 16

17 16. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall

18 cause the Summary Notice to be published electronically once on the

19 GlobeNewswire and in print once in the Investor’s Business Daily within ten (10)

20 calendar days after the entry of this Order. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel shall, at or

21 before the Settlement Hearing, serve upon Defendants’ counsel and file with the

22 Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of publication of the Summary Notice.

23 17. The forms and methods set forth herein of notifying the Settlement

24 Class of the Settlement and its terms and conditions meet the requirements of due

25 process and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Section 21D(a)(7) of

26 the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(7), as amended by the Private Securities

27 Litigation Reform Act of 1995; constitute the best notice practicable under the

6 28

Page 52: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 52 of 93 Page ID

#:2050

2

3

4

5

6

7

circumstances; and constitute due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities

entitled thereto. No Settlement Class Member will be relieved from the terms of

the Settlement, including the releases provided for therein, based upon the

contention or proof that such Settlement Class Member failed to receive actual or

adequate notice.

18. In order to be entitled to participate in recovery from the Net

Settlement Fund after the Effective Date, each Settlement Class Member shall take

the following action and be subject to the following conditions: 9 (a) A properly completed and executed Proof of Claim must be

10 submitted to the Claims Administrator, at the Post Office Box indicated in the 11

Notice, postmarked no later than seventy-five (75) calendar days from the date of 12

this Order. Such deadline may be further extended by Order of the Court. Each 13

Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when legibly postmarked 14

(if properly addressed and mailed by first-class mail) provided such Proof of Claim 15

is actually received by no later than thirty (30) calendar days before the filing of a 16

17 motion for an Order of the Court approving distribution of the Net Settlement

18 Fund. Any Proof of Claim submitted in any other manner shall be deemed to have

19 been submitted when it was actually received by the Administrator at the address

20 designated in the Notice.

21 (b) The Proof of Claim submitted by each Settlement Class

22 Member must satisfy the following conditions: (i) it must be properly filled out,

23 signed, and submitted in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the

24 preceding subparagraph; (ii) it must be accompanied by adequate supporting

25 documentation for the transactions reported therein, in the form of broker

26 confirmation slips, broker account statements, an authorized statement from the

27 broker containing the transactional information found in a broker confirmation sli

28

Page 53: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 53 of 93 Page ID

#:2051

or such other documentation as is deemed adequate by the Claims Administrator o

2 Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel; (iii) if the person executing the Proof of Claim is acting

3 in a representative capacity, a certification of his current authority to act on behalf

4 of the Settlement Class Member must be provided with the Proof of Claim; and

5 (iv) the Proof of Claim must be complete and contain no material deletions or

6 modifications of any of the printed matter contained therein and must be signed 7 under penalty of perjury.

(c) Once the Claims Administrator has considered a timely 9 submitted Proof of Claim, it shall determine whether such claim is valid, deficient

10 or rejected. For each claim determined to be either deficient or rejected, the 11

Claims Administrator shall send a deficiency letter or rejection letter as 12

appropriate, describing the basis on which the claim was so determined. Persons 13

who timely submit a Proof of Claim that is deficient or otherwise rejected shall be 14

afforded a reasonable time (at least seven (7) calendar days before the date of the 15

Settlement Hearing) to cure such deficiency if it shall appear that such deficiency 16

17 may be cured.

18 (d) For the filing of and all determinations concerning their Proof

19 of Claim, each Settlement Class Member shall submit to the jurisdiction of the

20 Court.

21 19. All Settlement Class Members who do not submit valid and timely

22 Proofs of Claim will be forever barred from receiving any payments from the Net

23 Settlement Fund, but will in all other respects be subject to and bound by the

24 provisions of the Stipulation and the Order and Final Judgment, if entered.

25 20. Settlement Class Members shall be bound by all determinations and

26 judgments in the Litigation, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such persons

27 request exclusion from the Settlement Class in a timely and proper manner, as

28

Page 54: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 54 of 93 Page ID

#:2052

hereinafter provided. A Settlement Class Member wishing to request exclusion

2 from the Settlement Class shall mail such request, in written form, by first-class

3 mail, postage prepaid, or otherwise deliver it, so that it is received no later than

4 thirty (30) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing to the addresses listed in

5 the Notice. Such request for exclusion shall clearly indicate (i) the name, address,

6 phone number, and e-mail contact information (if any) of the person seeking 7 exclusion; (ii) each of the person’s purchases of Ambow ADS made pursuant

and/or traceable to Ambow’s IPO during the Settlement Class Period, including the 9 dates of purchase, the number of ADS shares purchased, and the price paid or

10 received per share for each such purchase; (iii) state that the sender specifically 11

requests to be excluded from the Settlement Class; and (iv) must be signed by such 12

person. The request for exclusion shall not be effective unless it provides the 13

required information, is legible, and is made within the time stated above, or the 14

exclusion is otherwise accepted by the Court. Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel may 15

contact any person or entity filing a request for exclusion, or their attorney if one is 16

17 designated, to discuss the exclusion.

18 21. Settlement Class Members who submit valid and timely requests for

19 exclusion from the Settlement Class as set forth in paragraph 20 shall have no

20 rights under the Stipulation, shall not be entitled to receive any payment out of the

21 Net Settlement Fund, and shall not be bound by the Stipulation, or the Order and

22 Final Judgment entered in the Litigation.

23 22. The Court will consider comments and/or objections to the

24 Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the application for Attorneys’ Fees and

25 Expenses and any payment to Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs, only if such

26 comments or objections and any supporting papers include the following

27 information: (1) name, address, and telephone number of the Settlement Class

28

Page 55: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 55 of 93 Page ID

#:2053

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Member, (2) all grounds for the objection, including any legal support known to

Settlement Class Member or their counsel, (3) the name, address, and telephone

number of all counsel who represent the Settlement Class Member, including

former or current counsel who may be entitled to compensation in connection with

the objection, (4) a statement confirming whether they plan to appear at the

Settlement Hearing, (5) the name, address, and telephone number of any counsel

that will appear at the Settlement Hearing, and (6) the number of times a

Settlement Class Member filed an objection in the previous five years and the

nature of each objection to each case in which a Settlement Class Member filed an

objection in the previous five years. All comments or objections must be served by

hand or sent by first-class mail and received at least twenty (20) calendar days

prior to the Settlement Hearing, upon each of the following:

SETTLEMENT CLASS COUNSEL:

Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90071

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING, LTD., JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, AND SHASHA CHANG:

Stephen D. Hibbard, Esq. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111

10

Page 56: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 56 of 93 Page ID

#:2054

1 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS MARK ROBERT HARRIS, DANIEL

2 PHILLIPS, AND TAO SUN:

3 Seth Aronson, Esq.

4 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 5 400 South Hope Street, 18th Floor

6 Los Angeles, California 90071

7 [Lisa Lo/Counsel for Lisa Lo]

8

9 and the objector has (by that same date) filed said objections, papers, and briefs,

10 showing due proof of service upon counsel identified above, with the Clerk of the

11 Court, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, 255 East Temple Street

12 Los Angeles, California 90012. Attendance at the Settlement Hearing is not

13 necessary but persons wishing to be heard orally in opposition to the Settlement,

14 the Plan of Allocation, and/or the application for Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses are 15 required to indicate in their written objection (or in a separate writing that is 16 submitted in accordance with the deadline and after instruction pertinent to the 17 submission of a written objection) that they intend to appear at the Settlement 18 Hearing and identify any witnesses they may call to testify or exhibits they intend 19

to introduce into evidence at the Settlement Hearing. Class Members do not need 20

to appear at the Settlement Hearing or take any other action to indicate their 21

approval. 22

23. Any Class Member who does not object in the manner prescribed 23

above shall be deemed to have waived all such objections and shall forever be 24

25 foreclosed from making any objection to the fairness, adequacy, or reasonableness

26 of the Settlement, the Order and Final Judgment to be entered approving the

27 Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, or the application for an award of Attorneys'

28 11

Page 57: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 57 of 93 Page ID

#:2055

1 Fees and Expenses and a payment to Lead and/or Named Plaintiffs, unless

2 otherwise ordered by the Court.

3

24. All funds held by the Escrow Agent shall be deemed and considered

4 to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of

5 the Court, until such time as such funds shall be distributed or returned pursuant to

6 the Stipulation and/or further order(s) of the Court.

7

25. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing or any 8 adjournment thereof without any further notice other than entry of an Order on the 9 Court’s docket, and to approve the Settlement without further notice to the Class.

10 26. All papers in support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation and 11

application for Attorneys’ Fees or Expenses or a payment to Lead and/or Named 12

Plaintiffs shall be filed and served thirty (30) calendar days before the Settlement 13

Hearing. 14

27. Any submissions filed in response to any objections or in further 15

support of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and any application for 16

17 Attorneys’ Fees or Expenses or a payment to Lead Plaintiff and/or Named

18 Plaintiffs shall be filed no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the Settlement

19 Hearing.

20 28. Neither the Defendants, any other Released Parties nor the

21 Defendants’ counsel shall have any responsibility for the Plan of Allocation or any

22 application for Attorneys’ Fees or Expenses submitted by Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel

23 or the Lead Plaintiff, and such matters will be considered separately from the

24 fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the settlement. Any order or proceeding

25 relating to the Fee and Expense Application, or the Lead Plaintiff and Named

26 Plaintiffs’ expense application, or any appeal from any order relating thereto or

27 reversal or modification thereof, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the

28 12

Page 58: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 58 of 93 Page ID

#:2056

Stipulation, or affect or delay the finality of the Judgment approving the

Stipulation and the settlement of the Litigation set forth therein.

29. At or after the Settlement Hearing, the Court shall determine whether

the Plan of Allocation that Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel proposes, and any application

for Attorneys’ Fees or Payment of expenses, shall be approved.

30. Neither the Stipulation, nor any of its terms or provisions, nor any of

the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, shall be construed as an

admission or concession by the Defendants or Released Parties of the truth of any 9 of the allegations in the Litigation, or of any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any

10 kind. 11

31. Pending final determination of whether the Settlement should be 12

approved, all Class Members, and each of them, and anyone acting or purporting to 13

act for any of them, shall be enjoined from prosecuting, attempting to prosecute, or 14

assisting others in the prosecution of, any Settled Claims. In addition, the 15

Litigation is stayed. 16

17 32. In the event the Settlement is not consummated pursuant to its terms,

18 the Stipulation, except as otherwise provided therein, including any amendment(s)

19 thereto, and this Order, shall be null and void, of no further force or effect, and

20 without prejudice to any Settling Party, and may not be introduced as evidence or

21 referred to in any action or proceedings by any person or entity, and each party

22 shall be restored to his, her or its respective position as it existed before the

23 execution of the Stipulation, pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. In such

24 event, the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of paragraphs

25 D.5., F.1-3., H, M.5-7., N.11-13., N.15., and N.18., shall have no further force and

26 effect with respect to the Settling Parties and shall not be used in this Litigation or

27 in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by the

28

2

3

4

5

6

7

13

Page 59: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 59 of 93 Page ID

#:2057

1 Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated,

2 nunc pro tunc .

3

33. The Court retains exclusive jurisdiction over the action to consider all

4 further matters arising out of, or relating to, the Settlement, including by way of

5 illustration and not limitation, any dispute concerning any Proof of Claim filed by

6 any Class Member and any future requests by one or more of the Parties that the 7 Final Order and Judgment, the Release and/or the permanent injunction set forth in 8 the Stipulation be enforced. 9

10

11 Dated:

2014 12

13

14 HON. PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 14

Page 60: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 60 of 93 Page ID #:2058

Exhibit A-i

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

BYRON BROWN, TIANQING ZHANG, AND ROBERTO SALAZAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD., JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, XUEJUN XIE, MARK ROBERT HARRIS, LISA LO, DANIEL PHILLIPS, TAO SUN AND SASHA CHANG

Defendants.

CASE No.: 12-cv-5062 PSG (AJW)

CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

If you purchased or otherwise acquired American Depository Shares (“ADS”) of Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. ("Ambow" or the "Company") during the period from August 5, 2010 through and including February 27, 2013 you could get a payment from a class action settlement (the "Settlement").

Under law, a federal court has authorized this notice.

• If approved by the Court, the settlement will provide $1,500,000, plus interest (the "Settlement Amount"), to pay claims of investors who purchased Ambow ADS during the period from its initial public offering on August 5, 2010 through and including February 27, 2013, and held such Ambow ADS through at least May 16, 2012 (the "Class Period").

Page 61: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 61 of 93 Page ID #:2059

• The Settlement represents an average recovery of $.09 per share of Ambow ADS for the 17.2 million shares outstanding as of February 27, 2013, the end of the Class Period. A share may have been traded more than once during the Class Period. This estimate solely reflects the average recovery per outstanding share of Ambow ADS. The indicated average recovery per share will be the total average recovery for all purchasers of that share. This is not an estimate of the actual recovery per share you should expect. Your actual recovery will depend on the aggregate losses of all Class Members, the date(s) you purchased and sold Ambow, and the total number and amount of claims filed.

• Attorneys for the Lead Plaintiff ("Class Counsel") intend to ask the Court to award them fees of $375,000 or twenty-five percent (25%) of the Settlement Amount, reimbursement of litigation expenses of no more than $115,000 and an award to the Lead and the two Named Plaintiffs not to exceed $1,500 each. Collectively, the attorneys' fees and expenses are estimated to average $.03 per share of Ambow ADS. If approved by the Court, these amounts will be paid from the Settlement Fund.

• The approximate recovery, after deduction of attorneys' fees and expenses approved by the Court, is an average of $.06 per share of Ambow ADS. This estimate is based on the assumptions set forth in the preceding paragraph. Your actual recovery, if any, will vary depending on your purchase price and sales price, and the number and amount of claims filed.

• The Settlement resolves the lawsuit concerning whether Ambow and its officers and directors made false and misleading statements, in violation of federal securities laws, based upon the allegations set forth in the Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, including that: (1) Ambow’s Registration Statement in connection with its Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) allegedly misrepresented the nature of its acquisition of the Changsha Study School (2) Ambow allegedly inflated its software revenue by improperly recording accounts receivable and (3) Ambow allegedly engaged in intentionally deceptive accounting practices concerning its allowance for doubtful accounts. Defendants Ambow, Jin Huang, Paul Chow, Shasha Chang, Tao Sun, Mark Robert Harris and Daniel Phillips (collectively, the "Defendants") deny all allegations of misconduct.

• Your legal rights will be affected whether you act or do not act. If you do not act, you may permanently forfeit your right to recover on this claim. Therefore, you should read this notice carefully.

2

Page 62: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 62 of 93 Page ID #:2060

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM The only way to get a payment. NO LATER THAN ________ __9 2014 EXCLUDE YOURSELF Get no payment. This is the only option that allows NO LATER THAN you to be part of any other lawsuit against the _______ __9 2014 Defendants about the legal claims in this case.

OBJECT NO LATER THAN Write to the Court about why you do not like the _______ __9 2014 settlement.

GO TO A HEARING ON Speak in Court about the fairness of the settlement. _______ __9 2014 DO NOTHING Get no payment. Give up rights.

INQUIRIES

Please do not contact the Court regarding this notice. All inquiries concerning this Notice,

the Proof of Claim form, or any other questions by Class members should be directed to:

Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

[email protected]

or

THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450

Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: 213-785-2610 Fax: 213-226-4684

[email protected]

COMMON QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CONCERNING THE SETTLEMENT

1. Why did I get this Notice?

You or someone in your family may have acquired Ambow ADS during the Class Period.

Page 63: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 63 of 93 Page ID #:2061

2. What is this lawsuit about?

The case is known as Gudimetla v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd., et al, Case No. 12-

CV-5062-PSG (AJWx) (the "Litigation"), and the Court in charge of the case is the

United States District Court for the Central District of California.

The Class Action involves whether the Defendants violated the federal securities laws

because the Company allegedly made false and misleading statements to the investing

public as set out in the complaint, including that: (1) Ambow’s Registration Statement in

connection with its Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) misrepresented the nature of its

acquisition of the Changsha Study School (2) Ambow allegedly inflated its software

revenue by improperly recording accounts receivable and (3) Ambow engaged in

intentionally deceptive accounting practices concerning its allowance for doubtful

accounts. The Defendants deny they did anything wrong. The Settlement resolves all of

the claims in the Class Action against the Defendants.

3. Why is this a class action?

In a class action, one or more persons and/or entities, called Lead Plaintiffs, sue on behalf

of all persons and/or entities who have similar claims. All of these persons and/or entities

are referred to collectively as a Class, and these individual persons and/or entities are

known as Class Members. One court resolves all of the issues for all Class Members,

except for those Class Members who exclude themselves from the Class.

4. Why is there a Settlement?

Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants do not agree regarding the merits of Lead Plaintiff’s

allegations with respect to liability or the average amount of damages per share that

would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiff were to prevail at trial on each claim. The issues

on which the Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants disagree include: (1) whether the

Defendants made false and misleading statements; (2) whether the Defendants made

these statements with the intent to defraud the investing public; (3) whether the

-4-

Page 64: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 64 of 93 Page ID #:2062

statements were the cause of the Class Members' alleged damages; and (4) the amount of

damages, if any, suffered by the Class Members.

This matter has not gone to trial and the Court has not decided in favor of either Lead

Plaintiff or the Defendants. Instead, Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants have agreed to

settle the Class Action. The Lead Plaintiff and Class Counsel believe the settlement is

best for all Class Members because of the risks associated with continued litigation and

the nature of the defenses raised by the Defendants. Even if Plaintiffs win at trial, and

also withstand the Defendants' inevitable challenge on appeal, Plaintiffs might not be able

to collect some, or all, of the judgment.

5. How do I know if I am part of the Class settlement?

To be a Class Member, you must have purchased or otherwise acquired Ambow ADS

during the period from August 5, 2010 through and including February 27, 2013 and held

such Ambow ADS through at least May 16, 2012.

6. Are there exceptions to being included?

Yes. Excluded from the Class are the Defendants, and all former officers and directors of

Ambow, and the members of such excluded persons' immediate families, legal

representatives, heirs, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and any entity in which any

excluded person has or had a controlling interest, and any persons who have separately

filed actions against one or more of the Defendants, based in whole or in part on any

claim arising out of or relating to any of the alleged acts, omissions, misrepresentations,

facts, events, matters, transactions, or occurrences referred to in the Litigation or

otherwise alleged, asserted, or contended in the Litigation. Also, if you exclude yourself

from the Class, as described below, you are not a part of the Class.

7. What does the Settlement provide?

a. What is the Settlement Fund?

The proposed Settlement calls for the Defendants to create a Settlement Fund (the

"Settlement Fund") in the amount of $1,500,000. The Settlement is subject to Court

-5-

Page 65: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 65 of 93 Page ID #:2063

approval. Also, subject to the Court's approval, a portion of the Settlement Fund will be

used to pay Lead Plaintiff’s attorneys' fees and reasonable litigation expenses and any

award to Lead and Named Plaintiffs. A portion of the Settlement Fund also will be used

to pay taxes due on interest earned by the Settlement Fund, if necessary, and any notice

and claims administration expenses permitted by the Court. After the foregoing

deductions from the Settlement Fund have been made, the amount remaining (the "Net

Settlement Fund") will be distributed to Class Members who submit valid claims.

b. What can you expect to receive under the proposed Settlement?

Your share of the Net Settlement Fund will or may depend on: (i) the number of claims

filed; (ii) the dates you purchased and sold Ambow ADS; (iii) the prices of your

purchases and sales; (iv) the amount of administrative costs, including the costs of notice;

and (v) the amount awarded by the Court to Lead and Named Plaintiffs and Class

Counsel for attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses.

PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND

The Plan of Allocation is a matter separate and apart from the proposed Settlement, and

any decision by the Court concerning the Plan of Allocation shall not affect the validity or

finality of the proposed Settlement. The Court may approve the Plan of Allocation with or

without modifications agreed to among the parties, or another plan of allocation, without further

notice to Settlement Class Members. Any orders regarding a modification of the Plan of

Allocation will be posted to the Settlement Administrator’s website, www.strategicclaims.net .

The Settlement Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant’s pro rata share

of the Net Cash Settlement Amount based upon each Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim.

Please Note : The Recognized Claim formula, set forth below, is not intended to be an estimate

of the amount of what a Settlement Class Member might have been able to recover after a trial,

nor is it an estimate of the amount that will be paid to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the

Settlement. The Recognized Claim formula is the basis upon which the Net Cash Settlement

Amount will be proportionately allocated to the Authorized Claimants. To the extent there are

sufficient funds remaining in the Net Cash Settlement Amount, each Authorized Claimant will

-6-

Page 66: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 66 of 93 Page ID #:2064

receive an amount equal to the Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim. If, however, the Net

Cash Settlement Amount is not sufficient to pay the total Recognized Claim of each Authorized

Claimant, then each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage of the Net Cash

Settlement Amount that each Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim bears to the total

Recognized Claims of all Authorized Claimants ( i.e. , “pro rata share”). No distribution will be

made on a claim where the potential distribution amount is less than ten dollars ($10.00) in cash.

If any of the Net Cash Settlement Amount remains by reason of uncashed checks, or

otherwise, after the Settlement Administrator has made reasonable and diligent efforts to have

Authorized Claimants who are entitled to participate in the distribution of the Net Cash

Settlement Amount cash their distribution checks, then any balance remaining in the Net

Settlement Fund six (6) months after the initial distribution of such funds shall be used: (i) first,

to pay any amounts mistakenly omitted from the initial distribution to Authorized Claimants or

to pay any late, but otherwise valid and fully documented claims received after the cut-off date

used to make the initial distribution, provided that such distributions to any late post-distribution

claimants meet all of the other criteria for inclusion in the initial distribution, including the

$10.00 minimum check amount set forth in the Notice; (ii) second, to pay any additional Notice

and Administrative Expenses incurred in administering the Settlement; and (iii) finally, to make

a second distribution to Authorized Claimants who cashed their checks from the initial

distribution and who would receive at least $10.00 from such second distribution, after payment

of the estimated costs or fees to be incurred in administering the Net Cash Settlement Amount

and in making this second distribution, if such second distribution is economically feasible. If

six (6) months after such second distribution, if any, or if such second distribution is not

undertaken, any funds shall remain in the Net Cash Settlement Amount after the Settlement

Administrator has made reasonable and diligent efforts to have Authorized Claimants who are

entitled to participate in this Settlement cash their checks, any funds remaining in the Net Cash

Settlement Amount shall be donated to a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization(s) selected by Lead

Counsel.

-7-

Page 67: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 67 of 93 Page ID #:2065

THE BASIS FOR CALCULATING YOUR RECOGNIZED CLAIM (I) Recognized Claim Calculation for American Depository Shares (ADS) Purchased or

Otherwise Acquired during the Class Period:

A) For each ADS sold during the Class Period, Recognized Claim per share will be the lesser of (1) inflation per share upon purchase less inflation per share upon sale (see TABLE A below for the estimated inflation per share during the Class Period); or (2) purchase price per share minus sale price per share.

B) For each share retained as of the close of trading on February 27, 2013, Recognized Claim will be the lesser of (1) inflation per share upon purchase (see TABLE A); or (2) purchase price per share minus $1.16 per share 1 .

(II) Recognized Claim Calculation for ADS Purchased in and Traceable 2 to the August 5, 2010 Initial Public Offering (“IPO”):

A) For each ADS sold during the Class Period, Recognized Claim per share will be the lesser of (1) inflation per share upon purchase less inflation per share upon sale (see TABLE A); or (2) purchase price per share (not to exceed the IPO price of $10.00 per share) minus sale price per share.

B) For each share retained as of the close of trading on February 27, 2013, Recognized Claim will be the lesser of (1) inflation per share upon purchase; or (2) purchase price per share (not to exceed the IPO price of $10.00 per share) minus $1.68 per share3 .

1 Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, "in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated" (the “Look Back Period”). Since Ambow ADS were suspended from trading from March 22, 2013 to May 16, 2014 the shortened Look Back Period is February 28, 2013 to March 22, 2013. The mean (average) daily closing trading price of Ambow ADS during this shortened Look Back Period is $1.16 per share.

2 Traceable ADS are shares purchased in the open market after the IPO (August 5, 2010) through and including the end of the 180-day “Lock-Up Period” on January 31, 2011.

3 This is the closing price per share on February 19, 2013, the date of the initial Section 11 lawsuit.

-8-

Page 68: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 68 of 93 Page ID #:2066

TABLE A

Period August 5, 2010 to May 15, 2012, inclusive May 16, 2012 May 17, 2012 to May 29, 2012, inclusive May 30, 2012 to July 3, 2012, inclusive July 5, 2012 to July 6, 2012, inclusive July 7, 2012 to July 9, 2012, inclusive July 10, 2012 to February 27, 2013, inclusive

On or after February 28, 2013

Inflation $3.42 per share $2.43 per share $2.13 per share $1.78 per share $0.87 per share $0.44 per share $0.26 per share $0.00 per share

To the extent a claimant had a trading gain or “broke even” from his, her or its overall

transactions in Ambow ADS during the Class Period, the value of the Recognized Claim will be

zero and the claimant will not be entitled to a share of the Net Settlement Fund. To the extent

that a claimant suffered a trading loss on his, her or its overall transactions in Ambow ADS

during the Class Period, but that trading loss was less than the Recognized Claim calculated

above, then the Recognized Claim shall be limited to the amount of the claimant’s actual trading

loss.

For purposes of calculating your Recognized Claim, the date of purchase, acquisition or

sale is the “contract” or “trade” date and not the “settlement” or “payment” date. The receipt or

grant by gift, inheritance or operation of law of Ambow ADS not be deemed a purchase,

acquisition or sale of Ambow ADS for the calculation of an Authorized Claimant’s Recognized

Claim. The covering purchase of a short sale is not an eligible purchase.

Authorized Claimants, who purchased ADS during the period August 5, 2010 through

and including January 31, 2011, will have their claims calculated under both Sections (I) and (II)

above and their Recognized Claim will be the greater of the two Sections.

For purposes of calculating your Recognized Claim, all purchases, acquisitions and sales

shall be matched on a First In First Out (“FIFO”) basis in chronological order. Therefore, on the

Proof of Claim enclosed with this Notice, you must provide all of your purchases and

-9-

Page 69: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 69 of 93 Page ID #:2067

acquisitions of Ambow ADS during the time period from August 5, 2010 through and including

February 27, 2013.

Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court shall be conclusive

against all Authorized Claimants. No person shall have any claim against Defendants,

Defendants’ Counsel, Lead Plaintiffs, Lead Counsel or the Settlement Administrator or other

agent designated by Lead Counsel based on the distributions made substantially in accordance

with the Stipulation and the Settlement contained therein, the Plan of Allocation, or further

orders of the Court. Each claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the

Court with respect to the claimant’s Claim Form. All persons involved in the review,

verification, calculation, tabulation, or any other aspect of the processing of the claims submitted

in connection with the Settlement, or otherwise involved in the administration or taxation of the

Settlement Fund or the Net Cash Settlement Amount shall be released and discharged from any

and all claims arising out of such involvement, and all Settlement Class Members, whether or not

they are to receive payment from the Net Cash Settlement Amount, will be barred from making

any further claim against the Net Settlement Fund beyond the amount allocated to them as

provided in any distribution orders entered by the Court.

8. How can I get a payment?

To qualify for a payment, you must send in a form entitled "Proof of Claim and Release"

form. This claim form is attached to this Notice. You may also obtain a claim form on

the Internet at www.strategicclaims.net . Read the instructions carefully, fill out the form,

sign it in the location indicated, and mail the claim form together with all documentation

requested in the form, postmarked no later than ________ __, 2014, to:

Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

[email protected]

The Claims Administrator will process your claim and determine whether you are an

"Authorized Claimant."

-10-

Page 70: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 70 of 93 Page ID #:2068

9. What am I giving up to get a payment or stay in the Class?

Unless you exclude yourself, you will remain in the Class. That means that if the

Settlement is approved, you and all Class Members will release (agreeing never to sue,

continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit) all claims against the Defendants, any of

their current, former, or future parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, joint venturers,

officers, directors, principals, shareholders, members, agents (acting in their capacity as

agents), employees, attorneys, insurers, reinsurers, advisors, accountants, associates,

and/or any other individual or entity in which any Defendant has a controlling interest or

which is related to or affiliated with any of the Defendants, and the current, former, and

future legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, or assigns of the Defendants

("Released Parties") in connection with your acquisition of Ambow ADS during the

Class Period, except that you do not release the Released Parties from any claim or action

to enforce the Settlement. It also means that all of the Court's orders will apply to you

and legally bind you. If you sign the claim form, you are agreeing to a "Release of

Claims," which will bar you from ever filing a lawsuit against any Released Party to

recover losses from the acquisition or sale of Ambow ADS during the Class Period,

except to enforce the Settlement. That means you will accept a share in the Net

Settlement Fund as sole compensation for any losses you have suffered in the acquisition

and sale of Ambow ADS during the Class Period.

10. How do I get out of the Settlement?

If you do not want to receive a payment from this Settlement, and you want to keep any

right you may have to sue or continue to sue the Defendants on your own based on the

legal claims raised in this Class Action, then you must take steps to get out of the

Settlement. This is called excluding yourself from – or "opting out" of – the Settlement.

To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must mail a letter stating you want to be

excluded as a Class Member from Gudimetla v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd., et al,

Case No. 12-CV-5062-PSG (AJWx). Be sure to include your name, address, telephone

number and your signature, along with an accurate list of all of your purchases and sales

-11-

Page 71: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 71 of 93 Page ID #:2069

of Ambow ADS. You must mail your exclusion request, postmarked no later than

__, 2014, to:

Ambow Education Holding Ltd., Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

[email protected]

You cannot exclude yourself by telephone or by e-mail. If you ask to be excluded, you

will not receive a settlement payment, and you cannot object to the Settlement. If you

ask to be excluded, you will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this Class

Action.

11. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants for the same thing later?

No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue the Defendants for the

claims that this Settlement resolves. If you have a pending lawsuit, speak to your lawyer

in that case immediately, since you may have to exclude yourself from this Class to

continue your own lawsuit.

12. Do I have a lawyer in this case?

The Court has not certified this action as a class action. Until the Court certifies this

action as a class action, you do not have a lawyer unless you actually retain one.

13. How will the lawyers be paid?

Class Counsel have expended considerable time litigating this action on a contingent fee

basis, and have paid for the expenses of the litigation themselves and have not been paid

attorneys' fees in advance of this Settlement. Class Counsel have done so with the

expectation that if they are successful in recovering money for the Class, they will

receive attorneys' fees and be reimbursed for their litigation expenses from the Settlement

Fund, as is customary in this type of litigation. Class Counsel will not receive attorneys'

fees or be reimbursed for their litigation expenses except from the Settlement Fund.

-12-

Page 72: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 72 of 93 Page ID #:2070

Therefore, Class Counsel will file a motion asking the Court at the Settlement Hearing to

make an award of attorneys' fees in an amount not to exceed $375,000 for reimbursement

of reasonable litigation expenses not to exceed $115,000, and an award to the Lead and

the two Named Plaintiffs in amounts not to exceed $1,500 each. The Court may award

less than these amounts. Any amounts awarded by the Court will come out of the

Settlement Fund.

14. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the Settlement?

You can tell the Court you do not agree with the Settlement, any part of the Settlement,

or Class Counsel's motion for attorneys' fees, and that you think the Court should not

approve the Settlement, by mailing a letter stating that you object to the Settlement in the

matter of Gudimetla v. Ambow Education Holding Ltd., et al, Case No. 12-CV-5062-

PSG (AJWx). Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, your signature,

a list of your purchases and sales of Ambow ADS in order to show your membership in

the Class, and all of the reasons you object to the Settlement. Be sure to mail the

objections to the four different places listed below, postmarked no later than _________

__, 2014, so the Court will consider your views:

Clerk of the Court United States District Court Central District of California Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012

Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: 213-785-2610 Fax: 213-226-4684

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class

Stephen D. Hibbard, Esq. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP

-13-

Page 73: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 73 of 93 Page ID #:2071

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111

Counsel for Defendants Ambow Education Holding, Ltd., Jin Huang, Paul Chow and Shasha Chang

Seth Aronson, Esq. O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street, 18 th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071

Counsel for Defendants Mark Robert Harris, Daniel Phillips, Tao Sun and Sasha Chang

15. What is the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion?

Objecting is simply telling the Court you do not like something about the Settlement.

You can object only if you stay in the Class. Requesting exclusion is telling the Court

you do not want to be part of the Class and Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you

cannot object to the Settlement because it no longer concerns you. If you stay in the

Class and object, but your objection is overruled, you will not be allowed a second

opportunity to exclude yourself.

16. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement?

The Court will hold a Settlement Hearing on _____ __, 2014, at __:__ _.m., at the United

States District Court for the Central District of California, 255 East Temple Street, Los

Angeles, CA 90012.

At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and

adequate and whether to approve the Settlement. If there are objections, the Court will

consider them, and the Court will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing.

The Court may also decide how much to pay Class Counsel for attorneys' fees and

expenses.

17. Do I have to come to the hearing?

No. Class Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. However, you are

welcome to attend at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to

-14-

Page 74: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 74 of 93 Page ID #:2072

come to Court to talk about it. As long as you mail your written objection on time, the

Court will consider it.

18. What happens if I do nothing at all?

If you do nothing, you will not receive a payment from the Settlement. However, unless

you exclude yourself, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be

part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants about the claims made in this case ever

again.

DATED: , 2014.

BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

-15-

Page 75: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 75 of 93 Page ID #:2073

Exhibit A-2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

BYRON BROWN, TIANQING ZHANG, AND ROBERTO SALAZAR, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD., JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, XUEJUN XIE, MARK ROBERT HARRIS, LISA LO, DANIEL PHILLIPS, TAO SUN AND SASHA CHANG

CASE No.: 12-cv-5062 PSG (AJW)

CLASS ACTION

SUMMARY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez

Defendants.

SUMMARY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

TO: ALL PERSONS WHO PURCHASED AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES (“ADS”) OF AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING, LTD. DURING THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 5, 2010 THROUGH FEBRUARY 27, 2013, INCLUSIVE AND HELD SUCH ADS THROUGH AT LEAST MAY 16, 2012.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to an Order of the United States District

Court for the Central District of California, that a hearing will be held on __________ at

_.m. in room before the Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge of the

Page 76: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 76 of 93 Page ID #:2074

Central District of California, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (the "Settlement

Hearing") for the purpose of determining: (1) whether the proposed Settlement consisting of the

sum of $1,500,000 should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate;

(2) whether the proposed plan to distribute the settlement proceeds is fair, reasonable, and

adequate; (3) whether the application for an award of attorneys' fees of no more than $375,000 or

25% of the Settlement Amount and reimbursement of expenses of not more than $115,000, and

an incentive payment of no more than $1,500 each to lead plaintiff and the two named plaintiffs,

should be approved; and (4) whether the Litigation should be dismissed with prejudice.

If you purchased American Depository Shares (“ADS”) of Ambow Education Holding,

Ltd. during the class period from August 5, 2010 through February 27, 2013, inclusive, and held

such ADS thought at least May 16, 2012 your rights may be affected by the Settlement of this

action. If you have not received a detailed Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action

and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release, you may obtain copies by writing to Ambow

Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services 600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3

Media, PA 19063 (866-274-4004 (Tel) 610-565-7985 (Fax); [email protected] ), or going

to the website, www.strategicclaims.net . If you are a member of the Class, in order to share in the

distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and Release no later

than , 2014, establishing that you are entitled to recovery. Unless you submit a written

exclusion request, you will be bound by any judgment rendered in the Litigation whether or not

you make a claim. If you desire to be excluded from the Class, you must submit a request for

exclusion postmarked no later than ______, 2014, in the manner and form explained in the

detailed Notice to the Claims Administrator.

2

Page 77: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 77 of 93 Page ID #:2075

Any objection to the Settlement, Plan of Allocation, or the Lead Plaintiff's Counsel's

request for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses must be in the manner and

form explained in the detailed Notice and postmarked no later than ______, 2014, to each of the

following:

Clerk of the Court United States District Court Central District of California Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and United States Courthouse 255 East Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012

Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: 213-785-2610 Fax: 213-226-4684

Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs and the Class

Stephen D. Hibbard, Esq. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111

Counsel for Defendants Ambow Education Holding, Ltd., Jin Huang, Paul Chow and Shasha Chang

Seth Aronson, Esq. O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street, 18 th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071

Counsel for Defendants Mark Robert Harris, Daniel Phillips, and Tao Sun

3

Page 78: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 78 of 93 Page ID #:2076

If you have any questions about the Settlement, you may call or write to Lead Plaintiff’s

Counsel:

Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: 213-785-2610 Fax: 213-226-4684

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE

REGARDING THIS NOTICE.

DATED: ______________________________ BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

Page 79: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 79 of 93 Page ID #:2077

Exhibit A-3

Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

[email protected]

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

Deadline for Submission:

IF YOU PURCHASED AMERICAN DEPOSITORY SHARES (“ADS”) OF AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD. DURING THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 5, 2010 THROUGH FEBRUARY 27, 2013, INCLUSIVE AND HELD SUCH ADS THROUGH AT LEAST MAY 16, 2012 (THE “CLASS PERIOD”), YOU ARE A “CLASS MEMBER” AND YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO SHARE IN THE SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS.

IF YOU ARE A CLASS MEMBER, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR ANY SETTLEMENT BENEFITS.

YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN THIS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE (“PROOF OF CLAIM”) AND MAIL IT BY FIRST CLASS MAIL, POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN _________ TO STRATEGIC CLAIM SERVICES, THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR, AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:

Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

[email protected]

YOUR FAILURE TO SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM BY _______, 2014 WILL SUBJECT YOUR CLAIM TO REJECTION AND PRECLUDE YOUR RECEIVING ANY MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH THE SETTLEMENT OF THIS ACTION. DO NOT MAIL OR DELIVER YOUR CLAIM TO THE COURT OR TO ANY OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR COUNSEL AS ANY SUCH CLAIM WILL BE DEEMED NOT TO HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM ONLY TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR.

CLAIMANT’S STATEMENT

1. I (we) purchased American Depository Shares (“ADS”) in Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. and was (were) damaged thereby. (Do not submit this Proof of Claim if you did not purchase Ambow ADS during the designated Class Period).

2. By submitting this Proof of Claim, I (we) state that I (we) believe in good faith that I am (we are) a Class Member as defined above and in the Notice of Pendency and Settlement of Class Action (the “Notice”), or am (are) acting for such person(s); that I am (we are) not a Defendant in the Actions or anyone excluded from the Class; that I (we) have read and understand the Notice; that I (we) believe that I am (we are) entitled to receive a share of the Net Settlement Fund, as defined in the Notice; that I (we) elect to participate in the proposed Settlement described in the Notice; and that I (we) have not filed a request for exclusion. (If you are acting in a representative capacity on behalf of a Class Member [e.g., as an executor, administrator, trustee, or other representative], you must submit evidence of your current authority to act on behalf of that Class Member. Such evidence would include, for example, letters testamentary, letters of administration, or a copy of the trust documents.)

3. I (we) consent to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to all questions concerning the validity of this Proof of Claim. I (we) understand and agree that my (our) claim may be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to my (our) status as

Page 80: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 80 of 93 Page ID #:2078

AMBOW a Class Member(s) and the validity and amount of my (our) claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Litigation or Settlement in connection with processing of the Proof of Claim.

4. I (we) have set forth where requested below all relevant information with respect to each purchase of Ambow ADS during the Class Period, and each sale, if any, of such securities. I (we) agree to furnish additional information to the Claims Administrator to support this claim if requested to do so.

5. I (we) have enclosed photocopies of the stockbroker’s confirmation slips, stockbroker’s statements, or other documents evidencing each purchase, sale or retention of Ambow ADS listed below in support of my (our) claim. (IF ANY SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN YOUR POSSESSION, PLEASE OBTAIN A COPY OR EQUIVALENT DOCUMENTS FROM YOUR BROKER BECAUSE THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NECESSARY TO PROVE AND PROCESS YOUR CLAIM.)

6. I (we) understand that the information contained in this Proof of Claim is subject to such verification as the Claims Administrator may request or as the Court may direct, and I (we) agree to cooperate in any such verification. (The information requested herein is designed to provide the minimum amount of information necessary to process most simple claims. The Claims Administrator may request additional information as required to efficiently and reliably calculate your recognized claim. In some cases, the Claims Administrator may condition acceptance of the claim based upon the production of additional information, including, where applicable, information concerning transactions in any derivatives securities such as options.)

7. Upon the occurrence of the Court’s approval of the Settlement, as detailed in the Notice, I (we) agree and acknowledge that my (our) signature(s) hereto shall effect and constitute a full and complete release, remise and discharge by me (us) and my (our) heirs, joint tenants, tenants in common, beneficiaries, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, attorneys, insurers and assigns (or, if I am (we are) submitting this Proof of Claim on behalf of a corporation, a partnership, estate or one or more other persons, by it, him, her or them, and by its, his, her or their heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns) of each of the “Released Parties” of all “Release of Claims,” as defined in the Notice.

8. NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILES: Certain claimants with large numbers of transactions may request, or may be requested, to submit information regarding their transactions in electronic files. All Claimants MUST submit a manually signed paper Proof of Claim form listing all their transactions whether or not they also submit electronic copies. If you wish to file your claim electronically, you must contact the Claims Administrator at 1-866-274-4004 or visit their website at www.strategicclaims.net to obtain the required file layout. No electronic files will be considered to have been properly submitted unless the Claims Administrator issues to the Claimant a written acknowledgment of receipt and acceptance of electronically submitted data.

-2-

Page 81: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 81 of 93 Page ID #:2079

AMBOW I. CLAIMANT INFORMATION Name:

Address:

City State ZIP

Foreign Provence Foreign Country

Day Phone Evening Phone

Email

Social Security Number (for individuals): OR Taxpayer Identification Number (for estates, trusts, corporations, etc.)

II. SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN AMBOW SECURITIES Purchases: A. Separately list each and every open market purchase of Ambow ADS during the period from August 5,

2010 through February 27, 2013, inclusive, and provide the following information ( must be document Trade Date Total Cost

(List Chronologically) (Excluding Commissions, (Month/Day/Year) Number of Shares Purchased Price per Share Taxes, and Fees)

B. Separately list each and every sale of Ambow ADS during the period from August 5, 2010 through February 27, 2013, inclusive, and provide the following information (must be documented ):

Trade Date Amount Received (List Chronologically) (Excluding Commissions,

(Month/Day/Year) Number of Shares Sold Price per Share Taxes, and Fees)

Ending Holdings: C. State the total number of shares of Ambow ADS owned at the close of trading

on February 27, 2013 long or short ( must be documented). If additional space is needed, attach separate, numbered sheets, giving all required information, substantially in the same format, and print your name and Social Security or Taxpayer Identification number at the top of each sheet. III. SUBSTITUTE FORM W-9

-3-

Page 82: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 82 of 93 Page ID #:2080

AMBOW

Request for Taxpayer Identification Number:

Enter taxpayer identification number below for the Beneficial Owner(s). For most individuals, this is your Social Security Number. The Internal Revenue Service (“I.R.S.”) requires such taxpayer identification number. If you fail to provide this information, your claim may be rejected.

Social Security Number (for or Taxpayer Identification Number individuals) (for estates, trusts, corporations, etc.)

______________________________ _______________________________

IV. CERTIFICATION

I (We) certify that I am (we are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406 (a)(1)(c) of the Internal Revenue Code because: (a) I am (We are) exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I (We) have not been notified by the I.R.S. that I am (we are) subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the I.R.S. has notified me (us) that I am (we are) no longer subject to backup withholding.

NOTE: If you have been notified by the I.R.S. that you are subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language that you are not subject to backup withholding in the certification above.

UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, I (WE) CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE INFORMATION I (WE) PROVIDED ON THIS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE.

Signature of Claimant (If this claim is being made on behalf of Joint Claimants, then each must sign):

(Signature)

(Signature)

(Capacity of person(s) signing, e.g. beneficial purchaser(s), executor, administrator, trustee, etc.) Check here if proof of authority to file is enclosed. (See Item 2 under Claimant’s Statement)

Date:

THIS PROOF OF CLAIM MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN _______________, 2014 AND MUST BE MAILED TO:

Ambow Education Holding, Ltd. Litigation c/o Strategic Claims Services

600 N. Jackson St., Ste. 3 Media, PA 19063

Tel.: 866-274-4004 Fax: 610-565-7985

-4-

Page 83: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 83 of 93 Page ID #:2081

AMBOW [email protected]

A Proof of Claim received by the Claims Administrator shall be deemed to have been submitted when posted, if mailed by _________, 2014 and if a postmark is indicated on the envelope and it is mailed first class and addressed in accordance with the above instructions. In all other cases, a Proof of Claim shall be deemed to have been submitted when actually received by the Claims Administrator.

You should be aware that it will take a significant amount of time to process fully all of the Proofs of Claim and to administer the Settlement. This work will be completed as promptly as time permits, given the need to investigate and tabulate each Proof of Claim. Please notify the Claims Administrator of any change of address.

REMINDER CHECKLIST

• Please be sure to sign this Proof of Claim on page 4. If this Proof of Claim is submitted on behalf of joint claimants, then both claimants must sign.

• Please remember to attach supporting documents. Do NOT send any share certificates. Keep copies of everything you submit.

• Do NOT use highlighter on the Proof of Claim or any supporting documents.

• If you move after submitting this Proof of Claim, please notify the Claims Administrator of the change in your address.

-5-

Page 84: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 84 of 93 Page ID #:2082

EXHIBIT B

Page 85: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 85 of 93 Page ID

#:2083

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 WESTERN DIVISION

4

5 BYRON BROWN, TIANQING ZHANG, 6 AND ROBERTO SALAZAR,

INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF 7 ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, 8

9 Plaintiffs,

10 vs.

11 AMBOW EDUCATION HOLDING LTD.,

12 JIN HUANG, PAUL CHOW, XUEJUN 13 XIE, MARK ROBERT HARRIS, LISA LO,

DANIEL PHILLIPS, TAO SUN AND 14 SASHA CHANG, 15

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

CASE No.: 12-cv-5062 PSG (AJW)

CLASS ACTION

[PROPOSED] ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez

Hearing date: TBD Hearing Time: TBD Courtroom: 880 Compl. Filed: June 11, 2012 Trial Date: N/A

0 28

Page 86: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 86 of 93 Page ID

#:2084

1

On the ____ day of ____________, 20__, this matter came before the Court

2 for hearing pursuant to the Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and

3 Providing for Notice (“Order”) dated ____________, 20__, on the application of

4 the parties for approval of the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement

5 of Settlement dated _____, 2014, (the “Stipulation”) to determine: (1) whether the

6 terms and conditions of the Stipulation are fair, reasonable, and adequate for the 7 settlement of all claims asserted by (i) the Settlement Class against (ii) defendants 8 Ambow Education Holding Ltd. (“Ambow”), Jin Huang, Paul Chow, Mark Robert 9 Harris, Daniel Phillips, Tao Sun, Lisa Lo, and Shasha Chang (collectively,

10 “Defendants”) and the other Released Parties, and (2) whether to approve the 11

proposed Plan of Allocation as a fair and reasonable method to allocate the Net 12

Settlement Fund among Settlement Class Members; and

13 The Court having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and

14 otherwise;

15 The Notice, substantially in the form approved by the Court in the Court’s

16

17 Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Providing For Notice (“Preliminary

18 Approval Order”), was mailed to all reasonably identifiable Settlement Class

19 Members;

20 The Summary Notice, substantially in the form approved by the Court in the

21 Preliminary Approval Order, was published in accordance with that Order and the

22 specifications of the Court; and

23 All defined terms herein have the same meanings as set forth in the

24 Stipulation;

25 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND

26 DECREED THAT:

27

28

Page 87: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 87 of 93 Page ID

#:2085

1

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Litigation,

2 Lead Plaintiff, Named Plaintiffs, all Settlement Class Members, and the

3 Defendants.

4

2. The Court finds that the prerequisites for a class action under Rule

5 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been satisfied in that:

6 (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all 7 members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common 8 to the Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Lead Plaintiff are typical of the claims 9 of the Settlement Class he seeks to represent; (d) Lead Plaintiff fairly and

10 adequately represents the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law 11

and fact common to the members of the Settlement Class predominate over any 12

questions affecting only individual members of the Settlement Class; and (f) a 13

class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient 14

adjudication of this Litigation. The Settlement Class is being certified for 15

settlement purposes only. 16

17 3. Pursuant to Rule 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil

18 Procedure, the Court hereby certifies this action as a class action for settlement

19 purposes only, and certifies a Settlement Class, defined as: “All persons or entities

20 who purchased or otherwise acquired Ambow’s American Depository Shares

21 (“ADS”) on August 5, 2010 through and including February 27, 2013, and held

22 such ADS shares through at least May 16, 2012.” Excluded from the Settlement

23 Class are:

24 (a) Defendants, present and former officers and/or directors of

25 Ambow and the members of such persons’ immediate families and their legal

26 representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, any entity in which any excluded

27 person has or had a controlling interest, and Ambow’s predecessors; and

2 28

Page 88: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 88 of 93 Page ID

#:2086

1

(b) Those persons who file valid and timely requests for exclusion

2 in accordance with the Preliminary Approval Order, a list of whom is attached to

3 this Order as Exhibit A; and

4

(c) Any persons who have separately filed actions against one or

5 more of Defendants, based in whole or in part on any claim arising out of or

6 relating to any of the alleged acts, omissions, misrepresentations, facts, events, 7 matters, transactions, or occurrences referred to in the Litigation, or otherwise 8 alleged, asserted, or contended in the Litigation. 9 4. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Lead

10 Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs are certified as the class representatives and the 11

Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel, which was previously selected by Lead Plaintiff and 12

appointed by the Court, is hereby appointed as Lead Counsel for the Settlement 13

Class. 14

5. The Court hereby finds that the forms and methods of notifying the 15

Settlement Class of the Settlement and its terms and conditions met the 16

17 requirements of due process and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

18 Section 21D(a)(7) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(7), as amended by

19 the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995; constituted the best notice

20 practicable under the circumstances; and constituted due and sufficient notice to all

21 persons and entities entitled thereto of these proceedings and the matters set forth

22 herein, including the Settlement and Plan of Allocation, to all persons entitled to

23 such notice. No Settlement Class Member is relieved from the terms of the

24 Settlement, including the releases provided for therein, based upon the contention

25 or proof that such Settlement Class Member failed to receive actual or adequate

26 notice. A full opportunity has been offered to the Settlement Class Members to

27 object to the proposed Settlement and to participate in the hearing thereon. The

28 3

Page 89: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 89 of 93 Page ID

#:2087

1 Court further finds that the notice provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28

2 U.S.C. § 1715, were fully discharged. Thus, it is hereby determined that all

3 members of the Settlement Class are bound by this Order and Final Judgment

4 except those persons listed on Exhibit A to this Order and Final Judgment.

5

6. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Court hereby

6 approves the settlement set forth in the Stipulation and finds that:

7

(a) said Stipulation is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, and adequate and 8 in the best interest of the Settlement Class;

9 (b) there was no collusion in connection with the Stipulation;

10 (c) the Stipulation was the product of informed, arm’s-length negotiati 11

among competent, able counsel; and

12 (d) the record is sufficiently developed and complete to have enabled the

13 Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants to have adequately evaluated and considered

14 their positions.

15 7. Accordingly, the Court authorizes and directs implementation and

16

17 performance of all the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, as well as the terms

18 and provisions hereof. The Litigation and the Complaint are hereby dismissed

19 with prejudice and without costs to any party.

20 8. Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members, on behalf of

21 themselves, their current and former heirs, executors, administrators, successors,

22 attorneys, legal representatives, and assigns, hereby fully, finally, and forever

23 release, relinquish, and forever discharge the Released Parties from any and all

24 Settled Claims, whether or not such Settlement Class Member executes and

25 delivers the Proof of Claim and Release form or shares in the Net Settlement Fund.

26 Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members, and anyone acting or purporting

27 to act for any of them, are hereby permanently and forever enjoined from

4 28

Page 90: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 90 of 93 Page ID

#:2088

prosecuting, attempting to prosecute, or assisting others in the prosecution of the

Settled Claims against the Defendants or any other Released Party.

9. Each of the Defendants, including any and all of their respective

successors in interest or assigns, hereby fully, finally, and forever releases,

relinquishes, and forever discharges any and all Settled Defendants’ Claims agains

the Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs, any of the Settlement Class Members and

any of their counsel, including Lead Counsel for the Settlement Class and any

counsel working under Lead Counsel’s direction. 9 10. Any Plan of Allocation submitted by Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel or any

10 order entered regarding any Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses application shall in no 11

way disturb or affect this Final Judgment and shall be considered separate from 12

this Final Judgment. 13

11. In accordance with 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(f)(7) and any other applicable 14

law or regulation, any and all claims which are brought by any person or entity 15

against the Defendants (a) for contribution or indemnification arising out of any 16

17 Settled Claim, or (b) where the damage to the claimant is measured by reference to

18 the claimant’s liability to the Lead Plaintiff or Named Plaintiffs or the Settlement

19 Class, are hereby permanently barred and discharged. Any such claims brought by

20 the Defendants against any person or entity (other than persons or entities whose

21 liability to Lead Plaintiffs or the Settlement Class is extinguished by this

22 Judgment) are likewise permanently barred and discharged. Nothing in this Order

23 shall apply to bar or otherwise affect any claim for insurance coverage by any

24 Defendant. Further, nothing in this Order shall apply to bar or otherwise affect any

25 independent claim each Defendant and its affiliates, successors, assigns, executors,

26 administrators, heirs, and legal representatives and other Released Parties who are

27 associated, affiliated or related to any of them (including their respective current,

2

3

4

5

6

7

28

Page 91: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 91 of 93 Page ID

#:2089

1 former, or future employer and their subsidiaries and parent companies) may have

2 against any other Defendant or any Released Parties associated, affiliated or related

3 to any other Defendant.

4

12. The Court finds that all parties and their counsel have complied with

5 each requirement of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to all

6 proceedings herein.

7

13. Neither this Order and Final Judgment, the Stipulation, nor any of the 8 negotiations, documents, or proceedings connected with them shall be: 9

10 (a) referred to or used against the Defendants or any other Released Party

11 or against the Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs or the Settlement

12 Class as an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Settled

13 Claim, or of wrongdoing or liability of anyone;

14 (b) construed against the Defendants or any other Released Party or

15 against the Lead Plaintiff and Named Plaintiffs or the Settlement

16 Class as evidence of, or an admission or concession that, the

17 consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which

18 could be or would have been recovered after trial;

19

(c) construed as, or received in evidence as, an admission, concession, or

20 presumption against the Settlement Class or any of them, that any of

21 their claims are without merit or that damages recoverable under the

22

Complaint would not have exceeded the Gross Settlement Fund; or

23

(d) used or construed as an admission of any fault, liability, omission, or

24

wrongdoing by any person or entity, or offered or received in

25 evidence as an admission, concession, presumption, or inference

26 against any of the Defendants or the Released Parties any civil,

27 criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative

6 28

Page 92: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

:12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 92 of 93 Page ID

#:2090

1 agency, or other tribunal. Defendants and/or the Released Parties may

2

file the Stipulation and/or the Final Judgment from this action in any

3

other action that may be brought against them in order to support a

4

defense or counterclaim based on principles of res judicata, collateral

5 estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment bar or reduction, or

6 any theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense

7 or counterclaim.

8 14. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court 9 hereby retains exclusive jurisdiction over the Defendants and the Settlement Class

10 Members for all matters relating to the Litigation, including the administration, 11

interpretation, effectuation, or enforcement of the Stipulation or Settlement and 12

this Order and Final Judgment, and including any application for fees and expense 13

incurred in connection with administering and distributing the settlement proceeds 14

to the Settlement Class Members. 15

15. Without further order of the Court, Defendants and Lead Plaintiff 16

17 agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the

18 Stipulation.

19 16. There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order and Final

20 Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is directed pursuant to

21 Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

22 17. The finality of this Order and Final Judgment shall not be affected, in

23 any manner, by rulings that the Court may make on Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel’s

24 application for an award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses.

25 18. In the event the Settlement is not consummated pursuant to its terms,

26 the Stipulation, except as otherwise provided therein, including any amendment(s)

27 thereto, and this Order, shall be null and void, of no further force or effect, and

7 28

Page 93: Srikanth Gudimetla, et al. v. Ambow Education …securities.stanford.edu/.../20141024_r01x_12CV05062.pdf2014/10/24  · Case 2 :12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page

Case 2

12-cv-05062-PSG-AJW Document 89-2 Filed 10/24/14 Page 93 of 93 Page ID

#:2091

1 without prejudice to any Settling Party, and may not be introduced as evidence or

2 referred to in any action or proceedings by any person or entity, and each party

3 shall be restored to his, her or its respective position as it existed before the

4 execution of the Stipulation, pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation. In such

5 event, the terms and provisions of the Stipulation, with the exception of paragraphs

6 D.5., F.1-3., H, M.5-7., N.11-13., N.15., and N.18., shall have no further force and 7 effect with respect to the Settling Parties and shall not be used in this Litigation or 8 in any other proceeding for any purpose, and any judgment or order entered by the 9 Court in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation shall be treated as vacated,

10 nunc pro tunc . 11

Dated:

201_ 12

13 HON. PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

8 28