Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown,...

32
Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy

Transcript of Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown,...

Page 1: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at

Neithercut WoodlandClay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy

Page 2: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Area of Concern Neithercut Woodland in Clare County

Owned and maintained by Central Michigan University Currently encompasses 252 acres of diverse habitats Originally owned by Josiah L. Littlefield in the early 1900’s A variety of vegetation, soil, and animals occupy this property

Page 3: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Spring Peeper – Pseudacris cruciferFamily: Hylidae

• Distinguishing Characteristics– Characterized by a distinct brown “X” pattern on a light brown or tan

body

– ~ 3.5 cm long

– Voice reminiscent of a clear, high-pitched rising “peep” sounded about once per second

– Males are slightly smaller than females and have darker throats

• Nocturnal• Hide in leaf litter, but are also good climbers

Page 4: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Breeding Behavior• One of the first frogs to be heard in spring

– Choruses can be heard from late March or early April through May

• Sexual maturity is typically reached around two years of age (Trenham et al. 2003)

• Use ephemeral or permanent wetlands • Females lay between 750 – 1,200 eggs

– deposited individually

– attached to sticks and aquatic vegetation

– eggs typically hatch within several days after being laid

• Larvae metamorphose in approximately two to three months and leave the pond for the adult stage of their life cycle.

Page 5: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Habitat and Food

• Michigan’s most abundant singing frog • Found throughout the state

– Inhabits deciduous and mixed woodlands, swamps, and marshes

• Burrow in the soil and use fallen trees and logs for cover • Persist at higher elevations, less acidic soils, less evergreen forest,

less cultivated land, and less open water (Gibbs et al. 2005). • Hibernate under logs and loose bark• Adult prey includes small insects – spiders, ants, water bugs• Tadpoles feed on algae and detritus

Page 6: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Range• Spring peepers are believed to be one of the initial herpetological

colonizers of eastern North America following the latest period of glaciation (Austin et al. 2002).

• Found throughout the majority of eastern North America, from Nova Scotia west to eastern Manitoba, and south to Texas and the Carolinas.

• Relatively common species throughout the Great Lakes

Page 7: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Wood Frog - Rana sylvaticaFamily: Ranidae

Appearance: Rusty brown and tan Yellow to light green under

parts Black striped patch “mask” White stripe on upper lip Dark spots on each side of

chest by the foreleg Average size 3.5 to 8 cm Females

much larger than males more brightly colored

http://www.britannica.com/eb/art/print?id=8032&articleTypeId=1

http://163.238.8.180/~fburbrink/Field%20Work/Midwest/

Page 8: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Wood Frog Reproduction

Breeding occurs very early in spring, often when ice is still on ponds.

Most active during warmer, damp evenings after the first spring rain in temporary ponds

Males attracted to larger females just as females attracted to larger males

Male calls - quack like projection http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

=F8vlf4sdLmY

Eggs deposited in floating rounded communal masses on water surface

Breeding frogs only remain in the pond for 1-2 days

http://www.marietta.edu/~biol/biomes/wetlands.htm

http://www.uri.edu/cels/nrs/paton/LH_wood_frog.html

Page 9: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Larva and Juveniles

http://www.nae.usace.army.mil/recreati/uvd/UVD_amphibians/uvdwoodfrog.html

Larva

Emerge from eggs in 1-2 weeks

If area dries too quickly, survival is often lost

Brown to gray dorsal side, brown to copper sides, and light ventrally

Feed on algae, plant tissue, small aquatic organisms, and organic matter

Juveniles

Feed on a variety of insects & small invertebrates such as spiders, slugs, and snails

Sexual maturation generally 1-2 years

http://www.umaine.edu/wetlands/VPwoodfrog2.htm

Page 10: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Habitat of Wood Frog

Wood frog prefers: Wet woodlands Wooded swamps Bogs

Can be found wondering into fields Tend to stay in same 100 sq meters throughout lifetime, staying in

same pond or wetland area especially after breeding first occurs By late fall typically travel upland for winter

Hide in or under logs, leaf litter, and humus.

http://www.eitangrunwald.com/NJ/NJp1.htm

Page 11: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Range of the Wood Frog

North of Arctic Circle in Alaska, across Canada, & through NE U. S.

Some in northern Georgia & central Alabama

Spotty distribution in Colorado & Rocky Mountains

Considered only frogs to be found north of Arctic Circle

Survive freezing 45% body in the winter Specialized proteins &

glucose prevent intercellular freezing and dehydration

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_frog

Page 12: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Green Frog – Rana clamitansFamily: Ranidae

There are several color variations of the green frog: green, yellowish green, olive, or brown, and in some rare

instances they can be blue Male and females also differ:

Males: Very bright yellow throat and tympanum larger than eye Females: white, light yellow, or cream colored throat, mottled

gray and black, tympanum smaller than eye Other distinguishing characteristics:

Dark cross bands on hind legs Ridge of skin from each eye curving behind tympanum and

extending one-half to two-thirds of the way down their back

Page 13: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

R. clamitans Hibernation & Reproduction Start to emerge from hibernation during the end of March thru April Breeding begins in May thru early August

Females produce 1-2 clutches each year 1,000 – 4,000 eggs per clutch Reproduction occurs in shallow backwaters

Male breeding call commonly heard during spring: A brief “clung” reminiscent of a loose banjo string

Will be given singly or several times in a row

A low growl connected to territoriality http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0uGjsM_gh4

Begin to enter hibernation again toward the end of October thru mid-November

Page 14: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Green Frog Habitat

Green frogs are found in very diverse bodies of water: Habitat generalists Ponds, lakes, swamps, sloughs, impoundments, and slow streams

Adults prefer deeper pools with less vegetation, and migrate beyond banks at night to forage Subadults prefer shallower pools with dense vegetation, and forage on

nearby banks

Dependent also on terrestrial habitat: Predation Sit-and-wait predators

Blue version of a male green frog

Page 15: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Range of the Green Frog

Can be found in Maine and the Canadian Maritime provinces west throughout the Great Lakes region to western Ontario, south to Oklahoma and northern Arkansas, and east through Tennessee and northern Georgia to coastal North Carolina and northward (Harding 1997).

Page 16: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Considerations

Three critical factors for wetland-breeding frogs:1. density of individuals that are dispersing from each wetland

2. species richness dependent on diversity of wetlands

3. probability of dispersal or re-colonization to adjacent wetlands

Wetland factors:

size, pond isolation, pond hydroperiod, timing of wetland drawdown, and individual life-history requirements (Paton and Crouch 2002) are imperative for wetland-breeding frog management.

Page 17: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Considerations

Invasive Species

Predatory fish – consume both larvae and adult frogs

Bull frogs – risk of competition and predation on all life stages

Invasive Plants – out compete native vegetation creating dense monocultures Typha spp. and Phragmites spp.

Page 18: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Considerations

Environmental contaminants and toxicants: Using herbicides to kill invasive plants could possibly have adverse

effects on local amphibian populations. In a lab study on juvenile amphibians, Roundup killed 68-86% of individuals

after one day (Relyea 2005). In natural systems??

Exposure to pesticides could directly reduce the abundance of prey species.

Community impacts of herbicides and pesticides make consistent monitoring of water quality and invertebrate community composition a crucial consideration for the successful management of anurans in Neithercut.

Page 19: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Considerations

Habitat Structure:

Population Disappearance:

urban development high intensity agriculture acid deposition

Population Persistence:

deciduous/mixed forest less evergreen forest less open water

Population Fluxes:

High local extinction rates:

require re-colonization from surrounding populations

need greater densities of nearby wetlands

consideration of landscape connectivity between wetlands and adjacent land is imperative

Page 20: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Goals and Objectives:

Create & maintain wetland habitat

Create corridors connecting hospitable wetland habitats.

Maintain critical breeding habitat for the wood frog

creating and conserving vernal pools

Monitor hydroperiods for reproductive success for both the spring peeper and green frog

Implement management of suitable habitat on a large spatial scale to sustain dispersal and re-colonization from local subpopulations

http://www.41south-aquaculture.com/wetland.html

Page 21: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Goals and Objectives:

Control chemical pollution Eliminate application of

herbicides and pesticides

Monitor native & non-native species Bi-yearly monitoring of

terrestrial/aquatic wetland and stream macroinvertebrates for species richness and diversity

Manage wetlands for invasive fish and plants

avoid the unwanted introduction of a species that could decimate breeding

http://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/taumsauk/testing.htm

http://chicagowildernessmag.org/issues/spring2007/water.html

Page 22: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Goals and Objectives: Maintain terrestrial habitat

Abundant deciduous/mixed forest cover

Restrict invasion of dominant conifer species

Prevent habitat disturbances Prevent installation of

permanent dams upstream and downstream of wetlands

maintain stable water levels for wetland breeding habitat

Limit use of motorized vehicles in Neithercut

Encourage private property owners to contribute their land in the form of a conservation easement

http://www.cha-llp.com/go/project/wetland-delineation-habitat-study

Page 23: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Recommendations Main Goal:

Increasing wetland breeding habitat throughout Neithercut in order to reduce local extinction rates and increase population success of these three amphibians

Recommendations: 1. Create corridors connecting hospitable wetlands for these three

species. Most amphibians cannot migrate more than 200-300 meters Corridors can be preserved by not clear cutting areas between wetlands and by

avoiding deforestation

Page 24: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Management Recommendations Cont…. 2. Create and maintain breeding habitat through hydroperiods

and vernal pools There are two types of hydroperiods:

Breeding Hydroperiods: the number of days when amphibians are actively breeding or larvae are developing in inundated wetlands

Pond Hydroperiods: the number of days a pond is inundated with surface water

Amphibians tend to inhabit areas with intermediate hydroperiodsVarious hydroperiods should persist for 4-9 monthsHydroperiods too long in duration can cause an increase in predators

3. Decrease chemicals in order to increase species overall fitness Freshwater environments are an ultimate sink for chemicals Pesticides and herbicides shouldn’t be used within 100 yards of wetlands

because of their slow decomposition

Page 25: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

4. Managing and monitoring both native and potentially harmful non-native species. Harmful species can be in the form of insects, fish, mammals, birds, and

vegetation Fish are one of the largest threats to amphibians both as predators and

competitors Fish presence will be monitored through electroshocking in order to manage for

invasive/unwanted species

Invasive vegetation such as cat tails (Typha spp.) outcompete beneficial native vegetation and therefore will need to be managed

5. Maintain and create terrestrial habitat for all three species Corse woody debris serve as source of cover during winter months and serve

as adequate cover for prey All fallen debris should be left untouched

Upland mixed/hardwood forests are utilized by these amphibians for foraging All deforestation and clear cutting will be avoided as much as possible

Management Recommendations Cont….

Page 26: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Neithercut Habitat Quality

Good overall habitat quality good sources of wetlands dispersed throughout the property with higher

lands for post breeding seasons and hibernating periods (Trenham and Shaffer 2005).

Several areas also have potential for temporary wetlands in the spring. • Elm Creek provides flooding areas of different levels for the various needs of

the different species.

A healthy hardwood habitat provides necessary shade, hospitable surface temperatures, soil structure, and adequate soil moisture that

Page 27: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Figure 12. Landcover and wetland classification for Neithercut Woodland, Clare County, MI.

Page 28: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Evaluation Techniques and Monitoring

Juvenile and adult counts – Pit fall silt fences During peak breeding activity periods for each species Completely around wetland areas to monitor the amount of

adults that enter the breeding pool and to see how many juveniles leave the wetland to

Whenever pit fall fences are used, daily visits are mandatory to count frogs and release them back to the other side of the fence.

Call surveys Surveys will be conducted once a week during breeding periods

Egg masses Surveyed over a three week period according to each frogs

breeding time

Page 29: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Evaluation Techniques and Monitoring Water Quality:

pH, dissolved oxygen, temperature, and conductivity Changes in water level Erosion and sedimentation Environmental toxicants

Macroinvertebrate surveys (sediments and wetlands) Turnover and extinction rates:

Extinction: dividing the number of ponds where local extinctions were observed by the number of ponds that were occupied the following year.

Colonization rates: dividing the number of newly occupied ponds by the number of occupied ponds from the previous year.

Page 30: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Timeline: Year One:

Spring 2008 Frog counts through breeding call surveys and pitfalls Begin water quality and soil testing Create buffer zones around wetlands Begin planning process Begin all baseline monitoring of invasive predators and available prey species

Fall 2008 Continue assessment Begin creating corridors Control for invasive species

Page 31: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Timeline (Continued) Year Two:

Spring 2009 Maintain terrestrial habitats Monitor hydroperiods Monitor for the presence of chemicals Species Count Continue monitoring invasive predators and available prey species Fall 2009 Monitor corridors for disruptions Correct any corridor disruptions

Fall 2009 Maintain and monitor achievements from Fall 2008

 Year Three – Year Five:

Spring 2010 – Fall 2012 continue tasks as done in previous seasons.

Page 32: Spring Peeper, Green Frog, and Wood Frog Management at Neithercut Woodland Clay Wilton, Randi Brown, Traci Goldsworthy.

Budget•       Neithercut Management Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year4 Year 5         

Equipment Needed Our Cost Our Cost Our Cost Our Cost Our CostHydrolab Quanta: Transmitter, SST $3,395.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hannd 3814 Ecological Test Kit $162.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 BOD Sampler $76.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 BOD Bottles $19.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Turbidity Sensor $935.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Runoff Sampler $4,470.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 GPS, eTREX, Garmin $119.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 AquaCalc 5000 Open Channel Computer $1,850.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Staff Gauges $32.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Hydra Probe II Soil Probe $361.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Complete Soil Test Kit $47.00 $0.00 $45.00/refill $0.00 $0.00 Dip Nets (3) $20.00 ea. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Chest Waiters (3 Pairs) $51.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Maintinence On Equipment $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00

Travel Expenses $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Exotic Species Extermination Will Be Based On SpeciesLR – 20 Electrofisher $6,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Frog Calls  Donated Donated Donated Donated DonatedSilt Fence $25.00/30.5 m $25.00/30.5 m $25.00/30.5 m $25.00/30.5 m $25.00/30.5 mPit Fall Cans $0.00  $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00            

Total: $21,778.90 $3,500.00 $3,545.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Total for Entire Project: $35,823.90