TERENA Activities Internet2 Members Meeting, International Task Force 8 October 2007.
Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia.
-
Upload
justin-randall -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia.
Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting
23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia
In Memoriam: April 16, 2007
Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting
23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia
Internet2 Land Speed Record
Rich CarlsonChairI2-LSR Judging Committee
Internet2 Land Speed Record Competition Rules
• Ultimate end-to-end networking • Open to everyone at anytime• Minimum 10min. X 100 km x 2
routers (30,000 km maximum)• TCP/IP (IPv4 and IPv6)• NGI-type networks• Winner must exceed previous record
by 10%
www.internet2.edu/lsr
Internet2 Land Speed Record
IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream
• 30 December 2006
• 230,100 terabit-meters/second
• 30,000 kilometers
• 7.67 gigabits per second
Internet2 Land Speed Record
IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream
• 31 December 2006
• 272,400 terabit-meters/second
• 30,000 kilometers
• 9.08 gigabits per second
Greater than the IPv4 I2-LSR for the first time
Internet2 Land Speed Record
Record Setting Team
• The University of Tokyo
• WIDE Project
• NTT Communications
• et al.
TokyoIPv6 servers
Progress in Land Speed RecordProgress in Land Speed RecordIPv6IPv6
Kei Hiraki
Data Reservoir project
The University of TokyoWIDE project
JGN2NTT Communications
Amsterdam
Thanks to All
History of single-stream IPv4 Internet Land Speed Record
2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
1
10
100
Distance bandwidth productPbit m / s
2004/11/9Data Reservoir project
WIDE project149 Pbit m / s
2002
1,000
2005/11/10240 Pbit m / s
10 Gbps * 30,000km
2006/2/20264 Pbit m / s
2004/12/24216 Pbit m / s
History of single-stream IPv6 Internet Land Speed Record
2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
1
10
100
Distance bandwidth productPbit m / s
2006/12/30230Pbit m / s
2002
1,000
2006/12/31272Pbit m / s
10 Gbps * 30,000km
2005/10/29167 Pbit m / s
2005/11/13208 Pbit m / s
10Gbps limitation
IPv6 99% of WAN PHY bandwidth 9.06Gbps
9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame
IPv4 98% of WAN PHY bandwidth 8.96Gbps
9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame
What’s Next• TCP bandwidth > 10Gbps (e.g.
11Gbps)• Zero-copy software removed CPU
bottleneck• Possibly in a year (2007-2008)• Please give us two lambdas
Server NIC40Gs
SwitchSwitchRouter
10G x 2
Server NIC
PCI-ex x16
www.internet2.edu/lsr
Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards
David Lassner, ChairApplications Strategy Council
Internet2 IDEA Awards Concept
Internet2 IDEA Awards recognize exemplary uses of advanced networking; those with substantial impact and benefit
www.internet2.edu/lsr
Judging Panel
• David Bantz, University of Alaska• Jacqueline Brown, University of Washington• Lisa Childers, ANL/University of Chicago• Julie Little, EDUCAUSE/ELI• Jennifer Oxenford, MAGPI• Art St. George, University of New Mexico• Susan Scott, IHETS• Brian Shepard, University of Southern California• Alan Whitney, MIT• Rodger Will, Ford Motor Company
Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards
Ted Hanss, ChairIDEA Awards Judging Panel
Judging Criteria
• Magnitude of positive impact on current users
• Technical merit of the application
• Breadth of impact, current and expected
Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007
Globus MEDICUS
• Stephan Erberich, Director Functional Imaging and Biomedical Informatics, University of Southern California
• Carl Kesselman, Director Center for Grid Technology, Information Sciences Institute
• Ann Chervenak Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Information Sciences Institute
MEDICUS use cases: Childrens Oncology Group and
Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation Grids
Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007
UltraLight
• Harvey Newman, Caltech• Julian Bunn, Caltech• Iosif Legrand, Caltech• Dan Nae, Caltech• Yang Xia, Caltech• Frank Van Lingen, Caltech• Michael Thomas, Caltech• Conrad Steenberg, Caltech• Arshad Ali, National Institute for Information
Technologies
Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007
UltraLight
• Fiasal Khan, National University of Scienceand Technology
• Shawn McKee, University of Michigan• Paul Avery, University of Florida • Richard Cavanaugh, University of Florida• Dimitri Bourilkov, University of Florida• Paul Sheldon, Vanderbilt University• Julio Ibarra, Florida International University• Heidi Alvarez, Florida International University• Laird Kramer, Florida International University
UltraLight
• Don Petravick, Fermilab• Les Cottrell, SLAC• W. Scott Bradley, BNL• Rick Summerhill, Internet2• David Foster, CERN• Alberto Santoro, State University of Rio de
Janeiro• Sergio Novaes, State University of Sao Paulo• Dongchul Son, Kyungpook National University
Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007
Delivering the next generation of network-aware real-time GridsThe network as an integrated, managed resource;
co-scheduled with computing and stortageHybrid packet-switched + dynamic optical pathsAgent-based services spanning all the layers
Leveraging US and international network partnerships; With ESnet, USNet, KEK, Kreonet, GLORIAD, CHEPREO, WHREN/LILA, Awave, FLR, Pacific Wave, Translight,
NetherlightExtensions to Korea, Brazil, Japan and Taiwan
http://ultralight.caltech.edu Led by Caltech
U. Florida, FIU, UMich, SLAC,FNAL, MIT, CERN, Internet2, UERJ(Rio), USP, CENIC,Translight, Cisco
Four Continent Testbed
Building a global, network-aware end-to-end managed real-time Grid
FDT – Fast Data TransferAn easy-to-use application for efficient data transfers
Written in Java (with NIO libraries), it runs on all major platforms
Uses asynch., multithreaded system to: stream a dataset (list of files) continu-
ously, through an open TCP socket use multiple TCP streams, when
necessary use independent threads to read
& write on each physical device use appropriate size of buffers
for disk I/O and networking; moderate buffer sending-rate for smooth data flow
Can resume a file transfer session Can "plug-in" external security APIs and Can "plug-in" external security APIs and
use them to authenticate and authorize use them to authenticate and authorize clients: SSH, GSI-SSH, Globus-GSI, SSL clients: SSH, GSI-SSH, Globus-GSI, SSL
BWC: Stable disk-to-disk flows Tampa-Caltech: 10-to-10 and 8-to-8 1U Server-pairs for9 + 7 = 16 Gbps; then Solid overnight. Using One 10G link
17.77 Gbps BWC peak; 8.6 Gbps to and from Korea
New Capability Level: ~70 Gbps per rack of low cost 1U servers
I. Legrand
CERNGeneva
CALTECHPasadena
Starlight
Manlan
USLHCnet
Internet2
FDT Automatic Path Recovery: Fiber Cut Simulations
“Fiber cut” simulationsThe traffic moves from one transatlantic link to the other oneFDT transfer (CERN – CALTECH) continues uninterruptedTCP fully recovers in ~ 20s
1
23
4
FDT Transfer
www.internet2.edu/idea
Governance and Nominations Committee Update
Steve Hall, ChairDavid Lassner, Vice-chair
Governance and Nominations CommitteeSteve Hall, Governance and Nominations Committee chair,
Industry Strategy Council chairDavid Lassner, University of Hawaii, Applications Strategy
Council chair, Governance and Nominations Committee vice-chair
Mary Sue Coleman, University of MichiganKristine Hafner, University of California Office of the
PresidentGwen Jacobs, Montana State UniversityLen Kleinrock, University of California Los AngelesMichael Krugman, Boston University and Northern
Crossroads GigaPoP
Governance and Nominations CommitteeLarry Landweber, University of Wisconsin Madison,
and Network Research Liaison Council chair David Lassner, University of Hawaii,
and Applications Strategy Council chairJack McCredie, University of California Berkeley,
and Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council chairMarilyn McMillan, New York UniversityHarvey Newman, California Institute of TechnologyMike Roberts, The Darwin GroupPankaj Shah, OARnetDoug Van Houweling, Internet2, ex officio
Timeline Recap
Summer 2006• GNC Convened by Internet2 BoardDecember 2006 – January 2007• Draft report presented and finalized• Board endorses GNC recommendationsApril 2007• Council nominations openMay 2007• Nominations closeJune 2007• Member electionsJuly 2007• New Councils take effect
GNC Recommended Changes1. New Advisory Council Structure
Function rather than constituency
Heterogeneous membership, stratified elections
2. New Board Structure 15 members More voice from CIO’s, networks, researchers, industry
3. New Communications Structure
Formalized, predictable, consistent
2-way links across the organization
Advisory Councils
Implemented: Revised Advisory Councils
Architecture & Operations
Advisory Council
Services Advisory
Council
Research Advisory Council
Industry Relations Advisory Council
Elected members:•3 CIO background•3 Research background•3 R&E Net background•3 Industry background
Heterogeneous composition of each Council (15 per Council):•12 elected by membership at large •3 appointed by Board
•Open nominations•GNC oversees election•Membership election•Council members elect chair
New Advisory Council Structure
• Heterogeneous Membership for Each Council• 12 elected members:
• 3 researchers• 3 from industry• 3 from state or regional networks• 3 member CIOs
• 3 members appointed by Internet2 (Internet2-NLR) Board
• *3 additional members appointed by NLR Board to represent NLR investors
New Advisory Council Structure
Links to Management• Senior Management Liaison for Each Council• New “Chief Scientist” to be Liaison to
Research Advisory Council
Links to Board• Council Chairs Serve as Voting Trustees• Councils as Key Source of Policy Advice
Current GNC issues
• NLR participation on the GNC• Transition of current to new Councils• Constituency consultation and preparation of
ballot • Trusted election process• Identification of chairs• Criteria for and timing of appointed seats• Network Researcher Task Force• GNC composition and terms• Getting a great set of nominees!
GNC Communications with Membership
• Biweekly GNC meetings held in March and April, focused on nominations and elections process; two summaries and Call for Nominations sent to community to date
• Weekly GNC meetings starting 5/1 will be focused on preparing for the election; chairs will continue to update community on progress and plans
• Information on GNC, Call for Nominations, and evolving FAQ:
http://www.internet2.edu/about/governance/nominations.html
Election Process
• Modeled after EDUCAUSE process
• Voters are Executive Liaisons from member organizations in good standing
• Ballot form and process designed to ensure representation and participation
• External auditors assuring entire process is secure, private, and valid
Elections Schedule
• Nominations through 7 May• Ballots distributed in late May• Election 1-15 June • GNC recommends individuals for
Board-appointed seats on Councils• NLR Board appoints additional investor
seats• New Councils take effect in July
Please Help!
• Nominate respected colleagues!
• Nominate yourself!
Community Update
Tracy Futhey, Chair, National LambdaRail
Jeffrey Lehman, Chair, Internet2
Spring 2007Internet2 Member Meeting
23-26 April 2007Arlington, Virginia