Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

26
Implementing RFID without disrupting already successful bar code systems? MIT Enterprise Forum Auto-ID & Sensing Solutions Group MIT Stata Center 5 November 2012 Sprague Ackley Intermec

description

RFID Circle Event: DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION: The Internet of Things & Long-range RFID + Sensors -Improving the Retail Flow of Goods November 5, 2012, Range matters! Tag size matters! Sensing often matters! All at a very low cost! TODAY’S PROBLEM: Humans manually collect visibility data – it should be automatic! Data on the Internet has been largely created by human beings—typing, bar code scans, digital photos and more. Initial deployments of RFID solutions have relied heavily upon human intervention. Manual data collection is very time consuming and prone to errors. Implementing RFID solutions is a lot of hard work! THE SOLUTION – Smaller, Cheaper, Faster, Longer, Better! Long-range, low cost RFID takes the human out of the loop. The market for visibility solutions is soaring. The “Internet of Things” is hitting the mainstream. Today sensors, cameras, RFID, bar codes, and a variety of visibility viewing platforms are commonplace throughout the working world. In 2012 over 4 billion long-range RFID tags are expected to be produced for retail apparel. We are experiencing the initial stages of an onslaught of BIG Data automatically generated by an abundance of highly distributed wireless devices. Long-range RFID to track elements of the physical world couples with ubiquitous connectivity to the Internet to distribute BIG DATA and view information generated by these ubiquitous digital identifiers and sensors. TODAY’s CHALLENGES End users are confronted by an overwhelming number of questions. What to buy? What’s good? What to avoid? Typical pitfalls? How best to organize? How to install the systems? ‘Peaceful co-existence’ with legacy systems and business processes . . . . . POS, bar code, inventory management . . . . . How to blend the old with the new? Seamless adoption, integration and deployment? How best to analyze BIG DATA? For what purpose? ‘Fit’ with other innovative technologies? Costs? Tags, Infrastructure, Integration . . . . . Speakers: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec Christophe Loussert, VP, RFID integration, Tagsys Greg Morello, CMO, Port Logistics Group (PLG) Thomas Reese, Sr. Director, Business Development, Intelleflex Corp. Moderator: Michael Ohanian, retired President of Intermec Technologies

Transcript of Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Page 1: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Implementing RFID without disrupting already successful

bar code systems?

MIT Enterprise Forum Auto-ID & Sensing Solutions Group

MIT Stata Center 5 November 2012

Sprague Ackley

Intermec

Page 2: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Is there a trick to encoding my bar code data in RFID?

 How did RFID data end up so different from bar code data?

 How can my primary serialized bar code data be encoded directly into RFID?

  Is there ever going to be a simple way to encode bar code data into RFID?

Page 3: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

How did RFID data end up so different from bar code data?

  Initially, RFID only encoded a unique set of bits, i.e. not specific letters and/or numbers

  Later, users wanted to encode their own data   Parallel developments ensued

–  MIT Auto-ID labs à EPCglobal –  ISO/IEC 15962

Page 4: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

While chip technology marched on …

 UHF Gen 2 has four memory banks (MB)  MB01 encodes primary serialized identity  MB11 encodes “user” data

– GS1 user data is the AIs –  ISO user data is the DIs

Page 5: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

MB01- Primary serialized identity

 GS1 uses Electronic Product Code (EPC) – 96 bits (12 bytes), very space efficient – All numeric – Requires buying a “GS1 Company Prefix”

  ISO uses 15962 – Variable in length, less space efficient – Can be alpha-numeric – Low or zero cost enterprise identification

Page 6: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

MB11- Secondary “user” data

 GS1 EPC Tag Data Standard (TDS) – Highly complex but efficient encoding method – Numbers and letters are separated, mapped

and compacted – Has IP ramifications

  ISO/IEC 15962 – Very simple but less efficient method – Every character is 6 bits – Public domain IP

Page 7: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

MB01àEPC from MIT Auto-ID labs

 MIT scientists envisioned an “internet of things” where everything was unique

 Part of their plan identified enterprises

Page 8: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

EPCglobal from MIT Auto-ID labs

 GS1 (then UCC) first joined, then bought Auto-ID Labs, then replaced enterprise identification with their own system (i.e. “Company Prefix” as used in EAN/UPC)

 GS1 established an independent company which they called EPCglobal

Page 9: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

EPCglobal

 Early management actively resisted unifying EPC encoding with bar code

 Method for encoding a unique item number broke GS1 rules in place for >25 years

 Encoding methods actually prevented data in bar code symbols from being encoded in an RFID tag

 GS1 now “fixing” the inconsistencies

Page 10: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

EPC tag encoding overview

  EPC is 12 bytes, e.g. in hex 30 30 25 7B F4 6D 5B 20 00 00 01 90

  12 bytes is 96 bits 0011000000110000001001010111101111110100011011011011011001000000000000000000000000000011001000

0

  Bits are counted and assigned meaning

EPC Header Filter Partition length:8 3 3 bits:00110000 001 100 (7-digits)

Page 11: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

EPC tag encoding overview 00110000001100000010010101111011111101000110110110110110010000000000000000000000000000110010000

GS1 Company Prefix bit length (depends on Partition value):24 in this example bits:000010010101111011111101 digits:0614141 Indicator digit and Item Reference bit length:20 in this example bits:00011011011011011001 digits:112345 Note: GS1 Company Prefix can be 6 to 12 digits

Page 12: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

EPC tag encoding overview

00110000001100000010010101111011111101000110110110110110010000000000000000000000000000110010000

Serial Number bit length:38 (fixed) bits:00000000000000000000000000000110010000 digits:400 EPC URI urn:epc:id:sgtin: 0614141.112345.400

Page 13: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Bar code to an EPC tag*

Page 14: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Bar code to an EPC tag*

*Note: the number of digits in the GS1 Company Prefix is not known

*The Partition Value must be determined

* Leading digits of the GTIN determine the partition value (e.g. compare with a database of GS1 Company Prefixes)

Page 15: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

GS1 fixing the problem

  2007 “60-Day Review” identified concerns about bar code / RFID interoperability

  2008 GS1 Missing Identification Replacement (MIR) Guideline

  2009 GS1 BarCodes & EPC Interoperability Requirements

  2012 GSMP BC EPC Implementation Guideline

 Result – a clear need for an offline tool

Page 16: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Length of Company Prefix tool

  2012-08-23 First meeting of ad hoc to develop an offline tool

 Each Member Organization (MO) has a different way of assigning numbers

 The numbers which are assigned and not assigned must remain confidential

 Early discussions point to an algorithm based on a “table of ranges” that can be downloaded into a portable device

Page 17: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

MB01àISO/IEC 15962

 First RFID data encoding standard

 Developed with the idea that “RFID data was different” than bar code data

Page 18: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

ISO/IEC 15962

 An elaborate system of “Object IDs” was invented so each piece of data was addressable

 Different encoding methods are flagged by an Application Family Identifier (AFI)

 A particularly simple AFI (A1) is useful for encoding UII data

Page 19: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

15962 AFI A1 encoding overview

  UII = 25SUN043325711MH8031200000000001 –  Where 25S is the UII Data Identifier (DI) –  UN is the issuing agency ID –  043325711 is the enterprise ID –  MH8031200000000001 is the item number and serial

number combination   Each character is replaced by 6-bit ASCII   The bits are grouped into bytes (32x6=192à24)   Pad to a full byte if necessary with some or all of

the string “100000”

Page 20: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

15962 AFI A1 encoding overview

  Replace each character with 6-bit ASCII value

Page 21: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

15962 AFI A1 encoding overview   Group bits into bytes (8-bit groups) and convert

to hex

  Insert AFI for final encoded data stream A1 CB 59 AA E3 0D 33 30 2D 77 C7 1D 20 E3 C0 F1 CB C0 30 E3 C0 30 E3 C0 31

Page 22: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Is it ever going to be simple to encode bar code data into RFID?

  ISO à Application groups are adopting 15962 with AFI A1 to have a direct method of encoding bar code data in MB01

  GS1 à Has an online method of determining the length of the GS1 Company Prefix using GEPIR (Global Electronic Party Information Register)

  GS1 à Developing an offline tool that should lead to seamless data collection functionality

“Peace is at hand.” Henry Kissinger, 18 October 1969

Page 23: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

The answers

  How did RFID data end up so different from bar code data? Early proponents thought RFID would replace bar code so little effort was made to insure that they could work together.

  How can my primary serialized bar code data be encoded directly into RFID? ISO – by using 15962 with an AFI of A1hex. GS1 - With the EPC TDS, a GEPIR utility, zero filling and a default filter bit setting.

  Is there ever going to be a simple way to encode bar code data into RFID? Yes. The user community is not going to rest until there is.

Page 24: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

The future

“It is difficult to make predictions - particularly about the future.”

(Confucius, Winston Churchill, Groucho Marx, 'Yogi' Berra and

several others: Nature 455, 729, 9 October 2008)

Page 25: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

The future

  It took almost 20 years for the bar code supermarket system to become ubiquitous and it will probably take about the same time for RFID to do the same

  Applications changing from internal closed-systems to fully open systems are forcing more emphasis on data interchangeability

  Within the next five years, application data will be data carrier independent

Page 26: Sprague Ackley, Technologist, Intermec

Implementing RFID without disrupting already successful

bar code systems?

MIT Enterprise Forum Auto-ID & Sensing Solutions Group

MIT Stata Center 5 November 2012

Sprague Ackley

Intermec