SPONSORED PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING MAY 23, 2007 Dr. Kerry Davidson Deputy Commissioner for...
-
Upload
mason-schroeder -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
1
Transcript of SPONSORED PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING MAY 23, 2007 Dr. Kerry Davidson Deputy Commissioner for...
SPONSORED PROGRAMS COMMITTEE MEETING
MAY 23, 2007
Dr. Kerry Davidson
Deputy Commissioner for Sponsored Programs
Funding Recommendations for Proposals Submitted to the Board of Regents Post-
Katrina Support Fund Initiative (P-KSFI)
BACKGROUND
P-KSFI GOALS
Fund Targeted Scientific Projects Which:
Advance Science at National and International Levels
Accelerate Economic Development
Lead to Establishment of Nationally Recognized Centers
Fund Educational Reforms Which Strengthen the Scientific Pipeline
Funds Available $5 Million per year for 5 Years
$1.8 Million Enhancement for Severely Impacted Programs (ESIP)
Support Fund Total: $26.8 Million
Considerable Federal, State, and Private Leveraging Required
Two Types of P-KSFI Subprograms
Primarily Research Subprogram (PRS)May Include Educational Components
Primarily Education Subprogram (PES)May Include Research Components
DISCIPLINARY TARGETS FOR
P-KSFI PROGRAMS
IN-STATE SCIENTIFIC PANEL SELECTS ELIGIBLE P-KSFI
DISCIPLINARY AREAS(January, 2006)
Biological Sciences
Information Technology
Materials Science
UNIQUE ATTRIBUTES OF P-KSFI
Engagement of Major Scientific Researchers
Funding Across Constitutional Categories
Size of Commitment of Resources
Multi-institutional and Multi-disciplinary Requirements
CHARTING DIRECTIONS FOR P-KSFI
SUBPROGRAMS
AMERICAN ASSOCATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS)
REVIEW
Primarily Research Directions
1. 78 White Papers (July, 2006)
2. Group Interviews (Sept. 18-19, 2006)
Primarily Education Directions
1. 20 White Papers (July, 2006)
2. Group Interviews (Sept. 25-26, 2006)
AAAS REPORTS/BOARD RFPs
Board Approval of Primarily Research Subprogram and Primarily Education Subprogram Reports (October, 2006)
Dissemination of Primarily Research Subprogram and Primarily Education Subprogram RFPs (Jan. 31, 2007)
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED
FUNDING OF PRIMARILY RESEARCH
SUBPROGRAM PROPOSALS
PRS Proposal Submissions by CampusMarch 15, 2007
Lead Institution Total Submitted Submitted by Discipline
LSU-AG 2 Biological Sciences: 2
LSU-BR 4 Information Technology: 2; Materials Sciences: 2
LSUHSC-NO 3 Biological Sciences : 2; Information Technology: 1
LSUHSC-S 1 Biological Sciences : 1
LA Tech 2 Information Tech: 1; Materials Science: 1
LUMCON 1 Biological Sciences: 1
Loyola 1 Biological Sciences: 1
SLU 1 Biological Sciences: 1
SUBR 3 Biological Sciences: 1; Information Technology: 1; Materials Science: 1
Tulane 4 Biological Sciences: 1; Information Technology: 1: Materials Science: 2
TUHSC 4 Biological Sciences: 4
UL Lafayette 4 Biological Sciences: 2; Information Technology: 2
UNO 2 Materials Science: 2
Overall Total: 32
PRS Funding Requests by CampusLead Institution Year 1 Total ESIPLSU-AG $1,902,898 $9,891,719 $500,000
LSU-BR $7,672,869 $36,260,768 $0
LSUHSC-NO $4,215,213 $19,162,558 $1,101,262
LSUHSC-S $1,552,472 $7,235,650 $0
LA Tech $1,750,499 $11,264,431 $0
LUMCON $198,418 $568,651 $0
Loyola $125,773 $844,309 $86,536
SLU $722,479 $3,102,114 $0
SUBR $2,518,115 $16,033,243 $383,999
Tulane $6,004,222 $29,152,901 $1,325,000
TUHSC $6,775,586 $33,164,487 $825,472
UL Lafayette $6,403,245 $30,524,599 $409,909
UNO $1,999,977 $10,799,853 $800,000
TOTAL $41,841,766 $208,005,283 $5,432,178
Overall Total (Total + ESIP): $213,437,461
Primarily Research Subprogram Review Process
Primarily Research Subprogram Subject-Area Review Panels
April 16-23Biological Sciences (16 proposals)
Gerald Sonnenfeld, SUNY Binghamton University, Chair Christopher D’Elia, University of South Florida St. Petersburg Clinton Grubbs, University of Alabama at Birmingham Michael J. Friedlander, Baylor College of Medicine
Information Technology (8 proposals) John T. Gorgone, Bentley College, Chair Sartaj Sahni, University of Florida Phil Andrews, San Diego Supercomputer Center
Materials Science (8 proposals) Paul Peercy, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Chair David J. Duquette, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Angela M. Belcher, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Primarily Research Subprogram Final Review Panel
May 2 - 4 Winfred Phillips, Vice President for Research & Dean of the
Graduate School, University of Florida
John Cidlowski, Head of the Molecular Endocrinology Group and Chief of the Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Studies, National Institutes of Health
Jordan Konisky, Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, Rice University
Jack Dongarra, Director of the Innovative Computing Laboratory and Center for Information Technology, University of Tennessee
J. Trent Williams, Principal, Research Technology Strategies, Inc.
PRS Summary Funding Recommendations
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING (PRIORITY I) (4)
Rank # Lead Institution
Principal Investigator
Total Requested
Total Recommended
1 008 LSUHSC-NO
Alistair Ramsay
$7,212,558 $5,500,000
2 011 LA Tech Vir Phoha $3,638,104 $3,600,000*
3 005 LSU-BR Edward Seidel
$14,730,021 $7,000,000
4 032 UNO Charles O’Connor
$8,800,000 $5,000,000*
TOTAL $34,380,683 $21,100,000
* Includes $600,000 in ESIP monies
FINAL PANEL COMMENTHIGH QUALITY OF INVESTIGATORS
For diverse audiences it is important to emphasize that all proposals considered are led by nationally recognized and established researchers.
PRS Summary Funding Recommendations
RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING IF ADDITIONAL MONIES BECOME AVAILABLE (PRIORITY II) (5)
Rank # Lead Institution
Principal Investigator
Total Requested
Total Recommended
5 010 LSUHSC-S Steven Pruett $7,235,650 $5,000,000
6 007 LSUHSC-NO
Nicolas Bazan
$9,450,000 $6,000,000
7 021 TULANE Wayne Reed $13,000,000 $5,000,000
8 029 ULL Dmitri Perkins
$6,554,925 $3,000,000
9 009 LSUHSC-NO
Hilary Thompson
$2,500,000 $1,250,000
TOTAL $38,740,575 $20,250,000
PRS -- RANK #1“Center of Excellence for Vaccine
Development”
Alistair RamsayProfessor of Medicine
LSUHSC-NO
Paula GregoryAssociate
Professor of Genetics
LSUHSC-NO
Tarun MandalProfessor of Pharmacy
Xavier
Aaron MiscenichExecutive Director
New Orleans BioInnovation Ctr.
Interviewees
Joseph Moerschbaecher
V.C. for Academic Affairs
LSUHSC-NO
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS
“Center of Excellence for Vaccine Development” -- #1
● These well-funded, productive, and outstanding researchers have the expertise to make the program successful.
● This is an outstanding proposal to develop a vaccine center for the State of Louisiana which could have national and international prominence.
PANEL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPRS -- Rank #1
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$1,448,956 $1,010,901 $1,012,117 $1,013,368 $1,014,658
Due to budgetary limitations, the panel recommends that funding be reduced from the requested level of $7.2 million to $5.5 million, of which $600,000 is to come from ESIP. Matching funds should remain at the level indicated in the proposal.
PRS -- RANK #2“Center for Excellence in Integrated Smart Sensor Surveillance System”
Vir V. PhohaProfessor of
Computer ScienceLA Tech
Kody VarahramyanProfessor Electrical
Engineering & Director IfM
LA Tech
Dave NorrisDirector, Enterprise Ctr.
LA Tech
S. S. IyengarProfessor
Computer ScienceLSU-BR
Interviewees
Les GuiceV.P., Research &
DevelopmentLA Tech
Peter ChenProfessor
Computer ScienceLSU-BR
Gabrielle AllenAssoc. Prof.
LSU-BR
Brooks KeelV.C., Research &
Eco. DevelopmentLSU-BR
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“Center for Excellence in Integrated
Smart Sensor Surveillance System” -- #2
● Faculty expertise and experience is outstanding.
● The research is significant, innovative, and important.
● This project achieves the goals of the P-KSFI PRS.
PANEL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPRS -- Rank #2
The budget is justified and matching commitments are appropriate. The final panel recommends full five-year funding at a level of $3.6 million.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$380,634 $805,620 $827,455 $845,146 $741,145
PRS -- RANK #3“The LONI Institute: Advancing Biology, Materials
and Computational Sciences for Research, Education, and Economic Development”
Ed SeidelDirector, Ctr. for Computation &
TechnologyLSU-BR
Don GaverProfessor
Biomedical EngineeringTulane
Les GuiceV.P. of Research &
DevelopmentLA Tech
Habib MohamadianDean of Engineering
SU-BR
IntervieweesHarold SilvermanV.C. of Academic Affairs & Dean, Graduate Sch.
LSU-BR
Mike StubblefieldDirector, CEES
SU-BRScott Whittenberg
Professor of ChemistryUNO
Joe NeigelInstructor, Biology
ULL
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS
“The LONI Institute” -- #3
● If successful, this could become a world-class center.
● LONI is an excellent cooperative and multi-institutional partnership with which to further the State’s research and educational missions.
● The investigators have done an outstanding job of raising federal and other dollars to support this initiative.
PANEL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPRS -- Rank #3
The panel unanimously recommends that the proposal be funded at a level of $7 million for a five-year period.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$1,601,390 $1,322,040 $1,339,074 $1,359,589 $1,377,907
PRS -- RANK #4“A Center for Advanced Materials and
Nanotechnology in AMRI at the University of New Orleans”
Charles O’ConnorAdvanced Research
Materials Inst.UNO
John Wiley AMRIUNO
Kevin StokesAMRIUNO
Matthew TarrAMRIUNO
Interviewees
W. L. ZhouARMIUNO
Norma GraceV.C. for Tech. & Eco. Dev.
UNO
Scott WhittenbergProfessor of Chemistry
UNO
Mark DeCosterIfM
LA TechYuri LvovLA Tech
Gabriel CaruntuNanoPrism
Technologies, Inc.
Robert CashnerV.C. for Research
UNO
Joe KingDean, Col. of Sci.
UNO
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“A Center for Advanced Materials and
Nanotechnology” -- #4
● This is a very strong group of well-established and productive investigators, many of whom have worked together previously.
● The proposal presents very solid technology transfer and commercialization plans which are comprehensive in scope and well supported.
● This proposal contains compelling and innovative research ideas, especially in the energy storage work.
● This program has the potential to become a center of excellence in Louisiana.
PANEL FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPRS -- Rank #4
The panel recommends that the proposal be funded at a level of $5 million over 5 years and that the institutional match be maintained at the proposed level. The panel recommends that $600,000 come from ESIP funds.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$1,363,636 $909,091 $909,091 $909,091 $909,091
July 10, 2006White Papers Submitted
78
March 15, 2007Proposals Submitted
32
April 23, 2007Proposals Selected for Final Review
9
Proposals Recommended for Funding
May 23–24, 2007 4
DISTRIBUTION OF P-KSFI MONEY BY YEAR BY INSTITUTION
PRIMARILY RESEARCH SUBPROGRAM
Institution(s)* Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
TOTAL
LSUHSC-NO Tulane Xavier
$1,448,956 (includes $600,000 in ESIP funds)
$1,010,901 $1,012,117 $1,013,368 $1,014,658 $ 5,500,000
LaTECH LSU-BR
$ 380,634 $ 805,620 $ 827,455 $ 845,146 $ 741,145 $ 3,600,000
LSU-BR LaTECH SUBR Tulane ULL UNO
$1,601,390 $1,322,040 $1,339,074 $1,359,589 $1,377,907 $ 7,000,000
UNO LaTECH
$1,363,636 (includes $600,000 in ESIP funds)
$ 909,091 $ 909,091 $ 909,091 $ 909,091 $ 5,000,000
TOTAL $4,794,616 $4,047,652 $4,087,737 $4,127,194 $4,042,801 $21,100,000 ______________________
*The lead institution is indicated in red.
STAFF FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PRIMARILY RESEARCH
SUBPROGRAM
The staff recommends that the Board approve the four (4) Post-Katrina Support Fund Initiative (P-KSFI) Primarily Research Subprogram (PRS) proposals recommended by consultants for funding at the levels and durations and with the stipulations provided by consultants.
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED
FUNDING FOR PRIMARILY EDUCATION
SUBPROGRAM (PES) PROPOSALS
Primarily Education Subprogram Funding Requests
Lead Institution Year 1 Total ESIPDelgado $242,633 $1,278,422 $99,892
LSU-S $133,175 $406,075 $0
Loyola $255,278 $1,329,902 $50,000
McNeese $6,500 $52,710 $163,010
Nicholls $124,630 $623,150 $0
Nunez $959,600 $1,924,550 $0
Our Lady of Holy Cross $764,496 $2,128,991 $600,000
SELU $58,400 $496,400 $0
Xavier $122,125 $1,487,785 $150,000
TOTAL $2,666,837 $9,727,985 $1,062,902
Overall Total (Total + ESIP): $10,790,887
Primarily Education Subprogram Review Process
Primarily Education Subprogram Review Panel
May 6 - 8
George Watson, Senior Associate Dean of Natural Sciences and Mathematics University of Delaware
David Van Wylen, Associate Dean of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, St. Olaf College
Glenda Gentile, Director of Undergraduate Research, University of Arizona
PROPOSALS RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING (PRIORITY I) (7)
Rank # Lead Institution
Principal Investigator
Total Requested
Total Recommended
1 002 LSU-S Nathan Hutchings
$406,075 $406,075
2 009 Xavier Shubha Ireland $1,487,785 $1,047,125
3 008 SELU David Norwood $496,408 $425,000
4 001 Delgado CC
Warren Duclos $1,278,422 $965,000
5 005 Nicholls Raj Boopathy $623,150 $500,000
6 003 Loyola Frank Jordan $1,329,902 $625,000
7 004 McNeese Luther Stevenson
$163,010 $163,010
TOTAL $5,784,752 $4,131,210
PES – RANK #1“Shreveport/Bossier SciNet: Using
Information Technology Resources to Develop Interdisciplinary Life Science
Education Enhancements in Freshman/Sophomore Life Science and
High School Curricula”
Nathan HutchingsChair, Dept. of
BiologyLSU-S
Paul SissonDean
College of ScienceLSU-S
Jeff RobertsMath Science Technology
Caddo Parish School Board
INTERVIEWEES
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“Shreveport/Bossier SciNet” -- #1
● This is a comprehensive, interactive plan for curriculum development, high school teacher workshops, and research experiences that is likely to measurably improve student preparedness at multiple levels in the STEM pipeline, from high school through undergraduate education.
● This project is led by a dynamic and committed team, and includes an effective collaboration between LSU-S and regional high schools.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #1
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$133,175 $78,975 $87,400 $73,900 $32,625
The panel recommends full funding at the level of $406,075, with annual allocations as proposed.
PES – RANK #2“P-KSFI/Xavier Biothrust 21:
Rebounding from Katrina and Achieving New Heights in Educating a 21st Century
Biosciences Workforce”
Shubha IrelandChair, Dept. of Biology
Xavier
Michelle BoissiereCoordinator, Biology
Xavier
Mary CarmichaelCoordinator, Biology
Xavier
INTERVIEWEES
Gene D’AmourV.P. Office of Resource Development
Xavier
Cecile BrookoverAssist. Professor
Dept. of PsychologyXavier
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“P-KSFI/Xavier Biothrust 21”– #2
● This comprehensive project addresses the problem of sizable failure rates of students in introductory biology courses through laboratory and curriculum revision, tutoring and mentoring, and internships.
● Xavier has a long tradition of success in educating science graduates. This project’s role in continuing that tradition will yield broad impact in the region.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #2
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$272,125 $250,000 $250,000 $150,000 $125,000
The panel recommends funding at the full level of $272,125 for the first year, including $150,000 in ESIP funds, but also recommends reducing the award to $250,000 for years 2 and 3, $150,000 for year 4, and $125,000 for year 5. In each year, reductions should be made in requests for summer salaries and funding for support staff. The pledged level of institutional matching must be maintained in full throughout the project’s duration.
PES – RANK #3“Leveraging Louisiana’s Industrial and
Human Resources for Post-Katrina Recovery”
David NorwoodAssoc. Professor
PhysicsSoutheastern
Dan McCarthyDean, College of
Science & TechnologySoutheastern
Debra DolliverAssist. Professor
ChemistrySoutheastern
INTERVIEWEES
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“Leveraging Louisiana’s Industrial and
Human Resources for Post-Katrina Recovery” -- #3
● The Student Entrepreneurs as Active Leaders (SEAL) program is modeled after a successful program at Virginia Commonwealth University.
● This proposal is led by a strong interdisciplinary team of research-active faculty who will develop industrial collaborations and involve science majors in solving real-world problems.
● The program leadership is particularly strong, which indicates that success is likely....
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #3
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
$50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
The panel recommends funding for the first year at the level of $50,000; $75,000 for year 2; and $100,000 per year for the remaining three years. The pledged level of institutional match is a positive element of the proposal and should be maintained in full.
PES – RANK #4“Revised and New Curricula to Meet
Post-Katrina Employment Development Needs of the Region”
Warren DuclosChair, Computer Information Tech.
Delgado CC
Warren PunekyDean, Business &
TechnologyDelgado CC
Cris KoutsougerasChair, Computer Sci.
& Industrial Tech.Southeastern
INTERVIEWEES
Troy KammerdienerAssist. Prof., Col. of Sci. & Tech.
Southeastern
Daniel McCarthyDean, College of Sci. & Tech.
Southeastern
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“Revised and New Curricula to Meet
Post-Katrina Employment” – #4
● Curriculum alignment will aid in the student transition from Delgado, a two-year institution, to Southeastern’s four-year degree program.
● This proposal institutionalizes the collaboration of Delgado and Southeastern to address the IT needs of the regional business community.
● With the establishment of new curricula and the equipment to support them, the programs in computer information technology at both institutions will be strengthened.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #4
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
$300,000 $165,000 $250,000 $250,000
The panel recommends funding Delgado at the level of $235,000 for the first year, with $135,000 coming from ESIP funding. In year 2, the panel recommends that Delgado be funded at the level of $100,000. Further, the panel recommends funding Southeastern at the level of $65,000 per year for the first two years for equipping and initiating the Network Systems Administration Laboratory (NetSal). In years 3 and 4, the panel recommends that Delgado and Southeastern be funded at the combined level of $250,000.
PES – RANK #5“Laboratory Education Experiences for
Freshman and Sophomore Level Undergraduate Students in Biological
Sciences”
Rajkumar NathanielAsst. Prof. Biological
SciencesNicholls
John DoucetAssoc. Prof.
Biological SciencesNicholls
Earl MelanconHead, Biological
SciencesNicholls
INTERVIEWEES
Larry HowellAssoc. Provost
Nicholls
Carroll FalconProvostNicholls
Debi Benoit, DirectorResearch & Sponsored Prog.
Nicholls
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“Laboratory Education Experiences for
Freshman and Sophomore” -- #5
● This project is designed to ensure student access and success in biology by bolstering the performance of C-grade students through a two-pronged plan to reform the laboratory experience and establish a mentoring program.
● The emphasis of this project is on providing an undergraduate research experience that is bolstered by broad faculty participation with strong administrative support and a committed leadership team, including an eager cohort of junior faculty participants.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #5
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
The panel recommends funding at a level of $100,000 per year for five years. Because the undergraduate research program operates only during the academic year, faculty salary support for summer work does not seem warranted and should be eliminated. Institutional support is strong and should be maintained in full.
PES – RANK #6“An Interdisciplinary and
Experimental Approach to Strengthen Recruitment, Retention, and training in
Biological and Materials Sciences in Post-Katrina New Orleans”
Frank JordanChair
Dept. of Biological SciencesLoyola
George CapowichSpecial Assist. to Provost for
Research & DevelopmentLoyola
INTERVIEWEES
SELECTED PANEL COMMENTS“An Interdisciplinary and Experimental
Approach” -- #6
● The proposal uses an interdisciplinary approach to target STEM pipeline gaps in student transition from high school to post-secondary education by improving the mentoring culture and incorporating more experiential learning.
● Both Loyola and New Orleans could benefit substantially from this project.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #6
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
$225,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
The panel recommends that funding be reduced from the requested $175,000 to a level of $100,000 per year, except for year 1. In year 1, the PES commitment of $100,000 will be supplemented by $125,000 of ESIP funds for a total of $225,000. The panel recommends that the request for faculty and staff salaries be reduced by half, and that the number and size of teams be reduced accordingly.
PES – RANK #7“Mentoring at McNeese State University
(McMentor)”
Harold StevensonProfessor
Environmental Sci.McNeese
Nikos KiritsisDean, Col. of
Engineering & Eng. Technology
McNeese
Janet WoolmanDirector, Office of
Research Services & Sponsored Programs
McNeese
INTERVIEWEES
SELETED PANEL COMMENTS“Mentoring at McNeese State University
(McMentor)”– #7
● This proposal focuses on changing student behavior through peer mentoring and has excellent plans for implementing a student-to-student mentoring program for the STEM disciplines.
● If the project is successful, student retention is likely to increase.
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONSPES -- Rank #7
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
$59,210 $34,600 $34,600 $34,600
The panel recommends funding at the requested level of $59,210 from ESIP funds for the first year. The remaining three years should be supported with PES funds, at the level of $34,600 per year.
DISTRIBUTION OF P-KSFI MONEY BY YEAR BY INSTITUTION
PRIMARILY EDUCATION SUBPROGRAM*
Institution(s) Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
TOTAL
LSU-S
$ 133,175 $ 78,975 $ 87,400 $ 73,900 $ 32,625 $ 406,075
Xavier $ 272,125 (includes $150,000 in ESIP funds)
$ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 150,000 $ 125,000 $1,047,125
SLU $ 50,000 $ 75,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 425,000
Delgado SLU
$ 300,000 (includes $135,000 in ESIP funds)
$ 165,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 965,000
Nicholls $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000
Loyola $ 225,000 (includes $125,000 in ESIP funds)
$ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 625,000
McNeese $ 59,210 (includes $59,210 in ESIP funds)
$ 34,600 $ 34,600 $ 34,600 $ 0 $ 163,010
TOTAL $1,139,510 $ 803,575 $ 922,000 $ 808,500 $ 457,625 $4,131,210 ______________________
*Institutions where not required to partner when submitting applications to the PES.
64
STAFF FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE PRIMARILY EDUCATION
SUBPROGRAM
The staff recommends that the Board approve the seven (7) Post-Katrina Support Fund Initiative (P-KSFI) Primarily Education Subprogram (PES) proposals recommended by consultants for funding at the levels and durations and with the stipulations provided by consultants.