sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review - Indico · PPEP Funding Profile May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC...

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

Preliminary Project Execution Plan

& Analysis of Alternatives Edward O’Brien

May 23-25 2018

BNL May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review 1

Preliminary Project Execution Plan

May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review 2

The PPEP contains:

• Preliminary Project Baseline (Scope, Cost, Schedule, WBS, Funding Profile)

• Life Cycle Costs

• Acquisition Approach

• Tailoring Strategy

• Management Organization

• Baseline Change Control

• Project Management Oversight

• ESSH&Q

• Rules for Transition to Operations and Project Close Out

https://indico.bnl.gov/event/4625/attachments/18440/23295/sPHENIX_PPEP_Final.pdf

MIE Scope • The preliminary scope baseline for the sPHENIX Project is:

• A Time Projection Chamber (TPC), Electromagnetic Calorimeter (EMCal), a Hadronic Calorimeter (HCal) all covering 2π in azimuth. The TPC and HCal have pseudorapidity

• coverage of -1.1 ≤ η ≤ 1.1.

• The EMCal has pseudorapidity coverage of -0.85 ≤ η ≤ 0.85

• A Minimum Bias Trigger detector (MBD)

• Readout electronics to fully instrument the TPC, EMCal, HCal and MBD

• A Data Acquisition system with the capability to readout the TPC, EMCal, HCal and MBD with an event rate and data-logging rate commensurate with the sPHENIX physics goals.

• A DAQ/Trigger system that can provide minimum bias and energy cluster triggers at a rate necessary to carry out the sPHENIX physics program in AA, pA and pp collisions at RHIC.

• Project Management to carry the project scope through to a successful on time and on budget completion.


PPEP Budget by WBS L2


May 23-25, 2018 5

14 months schedule contingency

PPEP MIE Summary Schedule FY22

CD-0 (A) Sep 16

CD-1/3A Q4 18

CD-2/3 Q4 19 Early Finish Oct 21 CD-4 Dec 22

Design

Procurement

TPC Pre-Production TPC Procure Prod.

EMCal Pre-Production EMCal Procurement Production

HCal Pre-Production HCal Procure Production

Calorimeter Electronics Pre-Production Calorimeter Electronic Procure

DAQ/Trigger Pre-Prod DAQ/Trigger Procure

Min Bias Detector Pre-Prod

Fabrication & Assembly

TPC Pre-Production TPC Fab. & Assembly Prod.

EMCal Pre-Production EMCal Fab. & Assembly Production

HCal Pre-Production HCal Fabrication & Assembly Prod.

Calorimeter Electronics PreProduction Calorimeter Elect. Fab & Assy Prod.

DAQ/Trigger Pre-Production DAQ/Trigger Fab. & Assy Prod.

Min Bias Detector Pre-Prod. MinBias Assy.

FirmwareTPC TPC

EMCal

HCal

Calorimeter Electronics

DAQ/Trigger DAQ/Trigger Firmware

Min Bias Detector

System Testing

TPC Pre-Production TPC System Testing

EMCal Pre-Production EMCal System Testing

HCal

Calorimeter Electronics

DAQ/Trigger Pre-prodution DAQ/Trigger System Test

Min Bias Detector Pre-Production Min Bias Detector Test

Legend (A) Actual Completed/ Planned Today Schedule

In Progress Level 1 Milestone Contingency

FY21 FY23FY20

sPHENIX MIE Project

Summary Schedule

FY17

Pre-production HCal System Test

Pre-production Calorimeter Elect. System Test

FY19FY18FY16

Critical Path runs through: - EMCal Prototype Procure - EMCal Fab/Assy - Cal. Elec. Fab/Assy - Calorimeter Elec. Procure - Cal. Elec. Fab/Assy (SiPMs) Production - EMCal Module/Sector Prod. Fab/Assy - EMCal Sector Testing - Early Completion

PPEP Funding Profile


PROJECT NAME: sPHENIX

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 Total

Pre-R&D -

R&D 1,513 4,260 350 6,123

CDR 100 200 300

-

Construction 5,310 6,560 4,610 3,647 20,127

-

TEC - - 5,310 6,560 4,610 3,647 20,127

OPC 1,613 4,460 350 - - - 6,423

Total Project Cost 1,613 4,460 5,660 6,560 4,610 3,647 26,550

Total 1,613 4,460 5,660 6,560 4,610 3,647 26,550

Funding Profile

Life Cycle Costs


Acquisition Approach Acquisition of sPHENIX will be conducted by BNL. BNL will direct the sPHENIX project management team in the execution of the project and delegate to the team its authority for project execution. The BNL sPHENIX Project Office will manage the distribution- to and expenditure-of DOE funds including collaborating sPHENIX institutions. The project scope to be accomplished at collaborating institutions will be documented in Memoranda of Agreements between BNL and collaborating institutions. Statements of work between BNL and the collaborating institutions, including frequent milestones, will be used to track progress of their contributions to the project.

The acquisition approach for the project is described in detail in the sPHENIX Acquisition Strategy (AS). BNL will collaborate and work with many institutions, including other DOE National Labs and Universities (i.e. Stony Brook University). BNL will be responsible for overall project management but collaborators have will hold key roles as the WBS Level 2 Managers, Level 3 Managers and Control Account Managers.


PPEP Critical Decision Milestones


PPEP Level-2 Milestones


11

PPEP Threshold & Objective KPP’s

May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

The individual L2 components of sPHENIX are the MIE deliverables. Installation is NOT part of the MIE and not a deliverable. Beam collisions are not needed to satisfy the KPP’s.

Ultimate Performance Parameters


sPHENIX Management Organization in PPEP

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review 13 May 23-25, 2018

1.01 sPHENIX Project Management

I. Sourikova

1.02 sPHENIX TPC T. Hemmick

1.02.01 TPC Mechanics

K. Dehmelt

1.02.02 TPC R1 Modules

W. Llope


V. Green


S. Milov, B. Surrow

1.02.05 TPC FEE

T. Sakaguchi

1.02.06 TPC DAM J. Huang

1.02.07 TPC Support

Systems R. Pisani

1.03 sPHENIX EMCal

C. Woody

1.03.01 EMCAL Block Production A. Sickles

1.03.02 EMCAL Module Production and

Sector Assembly S. Stoll

1.04 sPHENIX HCal

J. Lajoie

1.04.01 Inner HCal Frame

J. Lajoie

1.04.02 Outer HCal

M. Connors*, C. Pontieri*,

S. Bathe*

1.05 sPHENIX Cal Electronics E. Mannel

1.05.01 Optical Sensors

C. Aidala

1.05.02 Calorimeter Front

End Electronics S. Boose

1.05.03 Calorimeter

Digitizer System CY Chi

1.06 sPHENIX DAQ &

Trigger M. Purschke

1.06.01 DAQ

E. Desmond

1.06.02 Trigger J. Nagle

1.06.03 Global Level 1 (GL1)

E. Desmond

1.06.04 Timing System

M. Purschke

1.07 sPHENIX MinBias Trigger Detector

M. Chiu

WBS Code WBS Name

Owner

WBS Code WBS Name

Owner

Level 2:

Level 3:

Key:

*Managed at L4

All Control Account Managers

are at L2


MIE L2/CAM and L3 WBS Org

PPEP Base Control Change Chart


Management Organization and Structure


PPEP Job Responsibilities


Integrated Project Team


ESSH&Q

• Institutional Requirements: Discussed in PPEP (posted on Indico)

• Organizational Requirements: Integrated Safety Management Plan(posted on Indico)

• National Environmental Protection Act: NEPA document (posted on Indico)

• Safeguards and Security : SVAs for cyber and equipment (posted on Indico)

• System Engineering – OSI (see System Integration presentation)

• Value Management – Practiced throughout the project. Described in AoA & RMP (posted)

• Value Engineering – Is being practiced in preproduction prototype design

• Configuration Management (see System Integration presentation)

• QA: Quality Assurance Plan (posted on Indico)


Transition to Operation & Project Close


22

Analysis of Alternatives Document


sPHENIX Alternatives The alternatives analysis aims to assess the different approaches to deliver a science program that. It is not intended to distinguish between particular detailed design solutions that utilize similar concepts and technologies. To this end, we have identified the following 7 alternatives for evaluation:

1. Use the existing STAR detector

2. Upgrade STAR detector

3. Upgrade PHENIX to sPHENIX detector

4. Build a new detector at RHIC

5. Perform the measurement at CERN with an LHC detector

6. Use other detector technologies

7. Do Nothing

Methodology of Comparison Selection criteria for the alternatives are based on the requirements described in the Mission Need Statement, as well as operations requirements, budgetary considerations, and scientific impact. The system must:

1. Meet the science requirements described in the Mission Need Statement and the 2015 Nuclear Science Advisory Committee Long Range Plan identified as vital QGP-related research questions that remain unaddressed: “probe the inner workings of the quark gluon plasma by resolving the properties on shorter and shorter length scales.”

2. Be available to leverage an existing Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC or LHC) and record data during an operating period consistent with the accelerators operating plans.

3. Deliver the required jet and heavy flavor measurement capability without undue risk and/or challenges

4. Have reasonable life cycle cost (LCC). Cost of:

– Construction

– Operation (assume a 5 year operation of the experiment)

– Decommissioning


Alternative 1: Use the Existing STAR Detector

May 23-25, 2018 24

The existing STAR detector could NOT complete the Science Mission. It would need an upgrade to its DAQ, Calorimetry and a new magnet in order to make viable measurements.

Alternative 2: Upgrade STAR Detector

May 23-25, 2018 25

STAR could be upgraded to complete the Science Mission however that would involve cutting the Beam Energy scan short or extending the length of RHIC operations for 3-4 years

Alternative 3: Upgrade PHENIX to sPHENIX

May 23-25, 2018 26

Upgrading the PHENIX Detector to sPHENIX is the best option. It meets all the Science Mission, Cost, Schedule and Risk criteria.

Alternative 4: Build a New RHIC Detector

May 23-25, 2018 27

A new detector could be built in a “green field” IR. At RHIC that is Building 1012. Studies have estimated the cost to bring B1012 up to STAR or PHENIX hall standards would cost $35M

28

Alternative 6: sPHENIX with Different Technologies


Magnet

• Build a new SC magnet with optimize performance parameters.

• Ideally we would like 30-50% higher field. The Babar magnet is very close to what we’d like for dimensions

• Estimate $20M based on standard magnet costing parameters.

Tracker

• Looked at alternate trackers to the TPC for close in tracking in a HI environment.

• Only other realistic technology at small radius is Silicon pixel+strip.

• Estimate $30M based on ALICE experience, vs $3M for the TPC

EMCal

• No viable Used EMCal was available with appropriate performance parameters

• Pb Shashlik is inexpensive but has too big a Moliere radius

• Babar CsI is too slow for RHIC. Far too much pile up

• Various configurations of a tungsten-based calorimeter were considered to all cost the same within estimating errors

Alternate Technologies for sPHENIX -continued


EMCal continued

• Pb tungstate has good enough Moliere radius and better energy resolution but is 3-6X more expensive.

• Estimate it would cost $15-30M more to build a Pb Tungstate calorimeter for sPHENIX

HCal

• No used HCal’s with appropriate dimensions available.

• Steel-scintillator HCal’s can double as a flux return and are relatively inexpensive to build.

• Concluded the no other HCal technology was as inexpensive especially when one factored in the double use as the magnet flux return.

We concluded that we had settled on the least expensive set of technologies that still could do the physics. Alternately choosing the next least expensive solution for the magnet, tracker and EMCal would raise the price of sPHENIX by $77M

Analysis of Alternatives Summary


AoA on Indico : https://indico.bnl.gov/event/4625/attachments/18431/23158/sPHENIX_AoA_050918_final.pdf

sPHENIX meets all criteria and has the best cost, schedule and risk performance.

Back Up

May 23-25, 2018 31 sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review

sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review - Indico · PPEP Funding Profile May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC...

Documents

Transcript of sPHENIX DOE-SC CD-1/3A Review - Indico · PPEP Funding Profile May 23-25, 2018 sPHENIX DOE-SC...