Spectrometer overview and requirements
description
Transcript of Spectrometer overview and requirements
11st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Spectrometeroverview and requirements
brief reminder of what SHiP needs (as of EOI)glimpse at vacuum tank and magnetEOI baseline "design" What next, work ahead: requirements from full simulation
21st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
SHiP (as of EOI)
Scope of spectrometer in two paddle strokes (as of EOI): Detect two oppositely charged particles with a vertex in the decay volume and measure an invariant massMake sure it's not background...
HNL produced from charm decay at dump, before 60m muon shield N
5m
Two setups in series => 2 decay volumes, Two spectrometersHNL
daughters
To be revisited for extended physics
(other hidden particles or decays)
31st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
EOI
"SHiP can be made with existing technologies" (but does not have to…)
Magnet: simple affordable warm dipole, "à-la LHCb"
Tracker: copy beautiful, super light NA62 trackeri.e. x/x0=0.11% per view
see Hans Danielson's and Sergeij Movchan's talks
41st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Magnet
Given such a magnet and tracker, we are still dominated by MS (0.5% total x/x0 for 4 views/station)
Thanks to W. Flegel
Task: revisit magnet requirements from detector simulationTask: produce a conceptual design, with FEA
Chosen such as to give MS Intrinsic resolution
Multiple Scattering
51st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Choice of dimensions (as of EOI)
Yield scales roughly with diameter squareFor 5m, a decay volume of about 40 m seems best
Task: Is a 5m diameter still resonable ? In view also of extended physics program, is it optimal ?
61st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Vacuum
EOI: require p < 1e-2 mbar (NA62 < 1e-5mbar)
Task: define vacuum requirements Task: investigate possible (cost effective) fabrication techniques, identify possible manufacturers, safety issuesTask: conceptual design of end flanges, FEATask: conceptual design of vacuum system
suppose (conservative, no bake-out, start pumping): Qoutgassing = 5∙10-8 mbar liter s-1 cm-2 , surface A = 5000 cm ∙ (250 cm) 2 = 109 cm2 required pressure p < 10-2 mbar Needed distributed pumping speed S > Qoutgassing A / p = 5000 liter/s
Thanks to G.Barber
71st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Assumptions for now ... (as of EOI)
Item NA62 SHiP
Diameter 2.5 m 5 m
Design rate max 500kHz/straw 2kHz/straw (ø1cm)*
Vacuum requirement p < 1e-5 mbar 1e-2 mbar
Views X, X+45°, X-45°, Y X, X+few°, X-few°, Y
spatial resolution per coord
per space point≤ 130um≤ 80um
similar or better
average track efficiency near 100% similar or better :-)
* assumed ~1e6 muons in whole aceptance per 1s spill
How do these impact the design ?What needs to be modified from NA62 to SHiP ?
see Hans Danielson's and Sergeij Movchan's talks
81st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Straw arrangement
NA62 or LHCb Outer Tracker
91st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Tracker: some work ahead
Task: build a prototype 5m long straw tube
Task: tests on different straw geometries – (larger diameter ? thinner wall ?)
Task: GARFIELD simulations (signal and wire deflection)– check effect of magnetic stray field
Task: define/identify readout front-end electronics
Task: study other tracker designs ?– e.g. low-pressure drift chamber
Task: optimal geometry (layout, straw arrangements, stereo...) to be defined from full simulation
101st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Backgrounds
Main identified sources of backgrounds to HNL decays:– -A or -A inelastic interactions in rest gas of fiducial volume– strangeness-producing -A or -A interactions in last (few) interaction
lengths before fiducial volume, giving mainly KL decays – 2- combinatorics from spurious muon flux, giving fake vertices in
fiducial volume
SHiP now in the process of trying to redefine detector requirements based on more sophisticated MC simulation of signal and background processes
In parallel, investigate technological aspects
111st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Interactions in rest gas
inel,N scales with E and rate with nuclear thickness (N/cm2 )
EOI: expect a few 105 neutrino interactions per 0.1m of W (int) per 21020 protons-on-targetfor 40m of 1atm air, this would scale down by a factor 40, thus to about 104 neutrino interactions per 21020 protons-on-targetTask: simulate actual -Air interactions with detector acceptance and revisit limit on tank pressure => impact on vacuum system design.NB: "high energy" neutrino flux is reasonably well understood (depends on dump target, but not on what comes after)NB: inel,A is many orders of magnitude larger. But can be VETOed... Requirement on VETO efficiency.
in N/cm3, tungsten:air ratio 16200
Here, N = nucleon, not HNL
121st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
KL decays (EOI)
Task: simulate KL decays with realistic detector => impact on tracker material budget, spatial resolution, magnet design
131st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
HNL (signal)
plots from Thomas Ruf(work in progress)
DOCA / 2
cm cm
GeV/c2 GeV/c2
cm
141st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Background from interactions
plots from Thomas Ruf(work in progress)
DOCA / 2
cm cm
GeV/c2 GeV/c2
cm
151st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
2-muon combinatorics bkg
Was not addressed at time of EOIAssumed that muon shield would reduce muon flux to sufficiently low flux– challenging...– and muon flux is not so easily predicted!
NowTask: simulate 2-muon combinatorics as func of expected muon flux => define VETO efficiency, time resolution, spatial coverage and granularity...
161st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
2-muon combinatorics bkg
Was not quantified in EOIAssuming 1s spill with 105 coming through...Number of time windows with >1 muons
Can reduce by veto efficiency squared… still not negligible?
plots from Hans Dijkstra(work in progress)
171st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
2-muon combinatorics bkg
plots from Hans Dijkstra(work in progress)
181st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
2-muon combinatorics bkg
plots from Hans Dijkstra(work in progress)
191st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
201st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Still a lot of (fun) work to be done…
Join the ship crew !
211st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
BACKUP
221st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
An alternative design
vacuump<10-2 mbar
vacuump<10-2 mbar
thin mylar (C-reinforced ?) windowlow pressure drift gasp =10...100 mbar
wire planes
231st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
How much mass is there ?
Material: dominated by the gas-confining walls
NA62-like:– one straw of 36um, 1cm, 5m contains 7.9g of PET– assume 1000 straws/view, 4 views, the mass in the circular acceptance
of 5m is: mPET = 24.8kg
– Including the impact angle (~28% more mass traversed) mPET = 31kg equivalent mass for perpendicular impact
Low-pressure window:– Circular window of 5m, try to get less than 15kg per window– For PET (1.4 g/cm3) this means a thickness of at most 0.55mm– For a para-aramid-reinforced mylar window, carbon fibre & resin
dominate the mass (PET is only for vacuum sealing), density can be of order ~ 0.3 g/cm3 equivalent (full surface)
Is that realistic ?
2-layer view
241st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
Who tried such a window before ?
251st
Wor
kSH
iP13
-Jun
-201
4Zü
rich
Mas
sim
iliano
Fer
ro-L
uzzi
With 5m diameter… a preliminary FEA
Very preliminary estimate: window strength given by a multi-layered grid of carbon-fibre ribbons with 60% Kevlar, 40% resin, and filling about 20% of the plane. With a thickness of 1 mm one can reach 500 mbar with a displacement at this pressure of about 550 mm. One has about 6 kg of Kevlar+resin and 2.8 kg of Mylar.
My preliminary conclusion: This would easily allow to work e.g. at 100 mbar.
But: Can one make such a window at all ?– Would require building a “small” prototype (1.5 – 2m diameter)
Also to check: drift diffusion ~ 1/sqrt(p), number of primaries, etc.
Thanks to C. Garion (TE-VSC)