Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow
description
Transcript of Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow
![Page 1: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow
Surface Roughness and Clouds
Stephen R. Hudson
Coauthors: Stephen G. Warren, Richard E. Brandt, Thomas C. Grenfell, and Delphine Six
![Page 2: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Background — Observations
• We have made spectral directional-reflectance observations of the snow at Dome C– 75°S, 123°E, 3250 m– 350—2400 nm– o 52—87°
• Representative of much of the East Antarctic Plateau
![Page 3: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Background — Observations
The observations were made with a 15° conical field of view from 32 m above the surface to capture the effects of the natural snow-surface roughness
![Page 4: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Background — Parameterization
• Using these observations we developed parameterizations for the anisotropic reflectance factor of Antarctic snow for most wavelengths, solar zenith angles, and viewing angles
• They provide a realistic surface boundary for Antarctic RT modeling
![Page 5: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Background — Advertisement
• Details about the observations and parameterizations are in the extended abstract and in press in JGR
• Today I will discuss the importance of surface roughness and how it relates to the effect of clouds on TOA-BRDF
![Page 6: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What does surface roughness do?
• Looking towards the sun you see shaded faces
• Looking away from the sun you see faces tilted towards the sun
![Page 7: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Is the roughness effect important?
• At South Pole, Warren et al. (1998) found intensities near the forward reflectance peak were about 25% greater when the solar azimuth was perpendicular to the sastrugi than when it was parallel to them
• In the perpendicular case they also observed a smaller increase in backscattered intensity
• There was little effect on near-nadir intensity• Leroux and Fily (1998) obtained similar results with a
modeling study, but the magnitude of their effect was larger due to the idealized geometry of the sastrugi in their model
![Page 8: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Roughness effect at Dome C
• Used DISORT to model the surface reflectance with a variety of phase functions (Mie, HG, Yang and Xie)
• Placed the snow under a clear, summertime-average, Dome-C atmosphere
![Page 9: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Roughness effect at Dome C
• Rough aggregate grains produce the best match between the model and observations, but the model produces significant error consistent with macro-scale roughness effects for all of the phase functions
![Page 10: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Roughness effect at Dome C
• The error increases with solar zenith angle
• The roughness has little effect on near-nadir intensity
![Page 11: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Effect of clouds on BRDF over snow
• The presence of a cloud over a snow surface has been observed to enhance forward reflectance into large viewing angles while reducing reflectance into other angles, including nadir (Welch & Wielicki 1989, Landsat; Wilson & Di Girolamo 2004, MISR; Kato & Loeb 2005, CERES)
• This observation is unexpected because the cloud particles are smaller, and are therefore likely to be more isotropically-scattering, than the snow grains
• We believe much of this effect is caused by clouds hiding the surface roughness, not by differences in the single-scattering properties of snow and cloud particles
![Page 12: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Effect of clouds at Dome C
• Nights with shallow fog allowed us to observe the reflectance of a cloud over the snow surface
![Page 13: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Observation of fog at Dome C
• The difference caused by fog at Dome C is similar to the error in the plane-parallel modeling results
![Page 14: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Modeling fog at Dome C
• Using DISORT to model the upwelling intensity above a thin cloud over a surface with the observed BRDF gives results very similar to the foggy observation
![Page 15: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Observed effect requires rough surface
• When the same cloud is placed over a modeled (flat) snow surface it does not produce the correct effect
![Page 16: Spectral Bidirectional Reflectance of Antarctic Snow](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081515/56814dd6550346895dbb3bb8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Summary
• Snow-surface roughness significantly affects the BRDF of snow
• Macroscale roughness should be considered along with microscale snow properties in modeling and observational studies of snow BRDF
• The strong enhancement of forward-reflected intensities and the reduction of backward-reflected intensities caused by the presence of a cloud over snow seems to be caused by the cloud hiding the rough surface