Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School...

44
Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic

Transcript of Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School...

Page 1: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education Law

Presented by:Jane R. Wettach

Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law SchoolDirector, Duke Children’s Law Clinic

Page 2: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

History of Discrimination Approximately 12 percent of

children have disabilities that affect their ability to learn

Disabilities range from mild to profound

Historically, the most impaired were excluded from education altogether

Some (such as blind, deaf, mentally retarded) were segregated in special schools;

Less impaired were in public school but were often retained in grade level, considered lazy or stupid, or dropped out of school because their needs weren’t met

Page 3: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Challenges to Discrimination &

the Right to be Educated

Early 1970’s – successful civil rights lawsuits brought on behalf of disabled children for inclusion in public schools

1975 – first federal law promising states federal funds to assist in educating children with disabilities -- Education for all Handicapped Children Act (94-142)

1990 -- revisions to EHCA, including new name: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

2004 – most recent revisions to IDEA

Page 4: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education Laws

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – 20 USC 1400 et seq and 34 CFR Part 300

Education of Children with Disabilities – NCGS 115C-106 et seq

North Carolina Policies, issued by the Dept. of Public Instruction N.C. Policies Governing Services for Children with Disabilities

Page 5: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IDEA – The Basic Promise All children with

disabilities are entitled to

A “free, appropriate, public education”

In the “least restrictive environment”

Pursuant to an Individualized Education Program (IEP)

Page 6: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IDEA Entitlements The right to be evaluated, at public

expense, to determine eligibility for special education

The right to an Individualized Education Program that provides the specialized instruction and related services needed to allow the child to make educational progress

Page 7: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IDEA Entitlements The right to be educated, to the maximum

extent possible, with typically developing peers

The right to access, to the maximum extent possible, to the general curriculum

Page 8: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IDEA Entitlements The right of parents to

be involved in the decision-making process and the development of the IEP

The right to review of decisions made by the IEP team through due process appeal

Page 9: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Who is a “child with a disability”?

Child (ages 3 – 21) must have an identified physical or mental dysfunction that interferes with educational performance

Child must need “specially designed instruction” to make educational progress (not just accommodations)

Page 10: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

What is a “FAPE”? A “free, appropriate public education” is

Special education (i.e., specially designed instruction to meet the unique needs of the child); and

related services (supportive services designed to enable the child to benefits from instruction – such as transportation and specialized therapies)

that allow the child to make reasonable educational progress.

Page 11: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

What is a “FAPE”? “Educational progress” is not

just academic learning, but includes – Socialization Adaptive/functional skills Language and communication Reduction of behavioral problems

Page 12: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

What is the “least restrictive environment”?

The LRE is the setting in which children with disabilities may be educated with typical children to the maximum extent possible

Page 13: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Least Restrictive Environment Every child should be

educated in the regular classroom, in the school he or she would attend if not disabled, with “supplementary aids and services.”

Special classes, separate schooling or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only if the nature or severity of the disability is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily

Page 14: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Least Restrictive Environment Disabled child need not be placed in a

regular classroom if: The child would not receive “educational

benefit” from being educated in regular classroom; or

The marginal benefit of being educated in the regular classroom is outweighed by the benefits of a separate setting; or

The disabled child is a disruptive force in the regular classroom.

Page 15: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education -- Eligibility

Child must be “referred” to be evaluated for possible special education services

A parent or teacher must make the referral. It must be –

in writing, addressed to the principal dated state reason for referral in terms of lack of

educational performance

The school district has an obligation to identify children who may need special education, but parent should refer if there are concerns

The parents must agree for the evaluation to proceed.

Page 16: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education -- Eligibility

Initial evaluation is usually conducted by a school psychologist (but it can be contracted out)

State policies set out required & recommended screenings & evaluations for each type of disability, as well as the criteria for eligibility in each category

Page 17: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education -- Eligibility School has 90 days from date of referral to

beginning of services

If parent believes school evaluation is incomplete or wrong, parent can ask for an independent evaluation at school expense

School must either pay for the evaluation, or file a due process petition to allow a judge to decide if school is obligated to pay

Page 18: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special Education -- Eligibility

After the evaluation is completed by the psychologist, eligibility is decided by a team of qualified personnel plus the parent, who review the testing

Parent may invite persons who have special expertise

Members of the team consider all information and then determine if child fits into one of the 14 eligibility categories (shown on next slide)

Page 19: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Categories of Eligibility Autistic Deaf Seriously emotionally

disabled (formerly BED) Deaf-Blind Hearing impaired Multi-handicapped Intellectually disabled

(formerly EMD, TMD) Orthopedically impaired

Other health impaired (includes ADD/ADHD)

Specific learning disabled (includes dyslexia)

Speech/language disabled Traumatic brain injured Visually impaired Developmentally delayed

(for children aged 3 – 7)

Page 20: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

The IEP Each eligible child must have

an Individualized Education Plan (IEP), revised at least annually

IEP is “blueprint” for the child’s free, appropriate, public education in the least restrictive environment

IEP must be written by a team of persons knowledgeable about the child and the child’s needs, including parents

Page 21: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

The IEP Must be designed to meet child’s unique needs,

and include: Current performance Measurable, objective annual goals

Short term benchmarks/objectives required for children who take alternate assessments

A statement of the special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services to be provided

Amount of special education to be provided Amount of related services to be provided Classroom and testing modifications Placement on continuum of settings

Page 22: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Follow up to IEPIEP is revised annually, or as often

as needed, to assure that child is making progress on goals

Child is re-evaluated at least every three years, or more often if needed (but not more than once a year unless parent and school district agree)

Page 23: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Entitlement to FAPE A “FAPE” allows a child to make reasonable

educational progress. For children with average cognitive skills, this generally means being taught the standard course of study, with appropriate supports & modifications, and passing from grade to grade.

A “FAPE” does not require services to “maximize the potential” of the student

Page 24: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

FAPE Progress should be measurable & measured.

A parent has the right to ask for objective testing on a regular basis that reflects progress.

A parent has the right to have periodic reports –as often as regular report cards go out -- of progress on IEP goals

Page 25: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Reasonable Progress Some ways to measure progress

Grades, if student is in standard curriculum Achievement of annual goals (so long as those

goals change from year to year and represent progressively more sophisticated skills)

Improvement on standardized measures that compare student to nationally-normed standards

Page 26: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Methodology As a general rule, a parent does not have

a legal right to demand a preferred teaching strategy or methodology. School personnel may choose the methodology to be used.

Parents have the right to demand a methodology that works. A legal claim arises if the child does not make progress with the methodology chosen by the school personnel.

Page 27: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IEP Timelines After parental consent for

evaluation, determination of eligibility must be accomplished within 60 days

After determination is made that a child requires special education, an IEP must be developed within 30 days

IEP shall be implemented “as soon as possible” following the IEP meeting

From referral to placement in appropriate program may not exceed 90 days

Page 28: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Private Services at Public Expense

If the school district cannot provide services that allow a child to make reasonable educational progress, it must pay for those services to be provided privately

If the school district does not provide the services, a parent can unilaterally place the child in a private school and request reimbursement

Page 29: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Private Services at Public Expense

If the parent unilaterally places his child in private school, he must:

Give the school district at least 10 days notice that he finds the IEP unacceptable, plans to place his child in private school, and demands tuition reimbursement

If the school district declines, parent must file a due process petition and prove that the child’s proposed IEP did not offer a FAPE and that the private school chosen was appropriate for the child

Page 30: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Discipline & Special Ed Students

Disabled children are treated as “regular ed” students if they are suspended for fewer than 10 days (cumulative in a year) (i.e., no protections, no recourse)

Disabled children have additional rights for suspensions of more than 10 days (cumulative in a year, if suspensions form a pattern)

Page 31: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

IDEA Discipline ProtectionsStudents with IEP’s are entitled to these protections:

Manifestation Determination ReviewFunctional Behavior AssessmentBehavior Intervention PlanContinuation of FAPE

Page 32: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Manifestation Determination Review

Before a disabled child can be suspended for more than 10 days, there must be a “manifestation determination review”

Relevant members of the IEP team shall determine whether the conduct in question was— Caused by or had a direct and substantial

relationship to the child’s disability, OR A direct result of the LEA’s failure to

implement the IEP

Page 33: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Manifestation Determinations No manifestation: proceed with

suspension, BUT continue with FAPE in an alternative

setting

Manifestation: no suspension allowed, BUT services & placement can be reviewed

and changed

MDR results are appealable But no “stay-put protection”; child stays in

alternative setting pending the appeal

Page 34: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

“Interim Alternative Educational Setting”

Regardless of whether behavior is a manifestation, a student may be removed to an “interim alternative educational setting” for 45 school days if the student Brought drugs or weapons to school Caused serious bodily injury

While in interim alternative educational setting, student should be able to have access to the general curriculum and make progress on IEP goals.

Page 35: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Functional Behavior Assessments

If appropriate, the school should engage in a functional behavior assessment (FBA)of the disciplined student

FBA is a process designed to better understand the child’s behavior What are the offensive behaviors? How often and in what context do

they occur? What triggers bring on the

behavior? What is the underlying function of

the behavior? What are potential replacement

behaviors that will accomplish the same function?

Page 36: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Behavior Intervention Plan

A BIP is a plan that is designed, based on the information gained in the FBA, to Reduce the likelihood of the

offensive behaviors occurring

Identify behavioral supports Structure the steps to be

taken when offensive behaviors occur (redirection, change environment, etc.)

Identify consequences

Page 37: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Continuation of FAPE Special education students

have the right to continued education during their period of suspension

They must be able to Continue to participate in the

general education curriculum, although in another setting

Progress toward meeting their IEP goals

Page 38: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Problem resolution under IDEA Informal resolution

Mediation

Due process appeal

State complaint

Page 39: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Informal resolution Conferences with teacher, principal,

service providers, special education administrators

IEP meetings

Facilitated IEP meetings

Page 40: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Facilitated IEP meetings DPI will provide a facilitator for an IEP

meeting No cost to parents Form to request on DPI (EC Division)

website (Facilitation request) May help parent have and take

opportunity to contribute to the meeting May help school personnel to take

parental information into account

Page 41: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special education mediation

A process offered free to parents and school systems, administered by the state dept. of education

A focused discussion, facilitated by a mediator, designed to bring parents and school personnel in a dispute to an agreement

Request mediation

Page 42: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Special education mediation

Voluntary on both sides Confidential – what people

say cannot be brought up in due process hearing or court (such as offers to settle in a certain way)

Ends either without an agreement or with a written mediation agreement that is enforceable in court

Page 43: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

Due Process Appeal Administrative hearing conducted

by state administrative court Formal, trial-like process with

witnesses and documentary exhibits

Best for resolving significant differences of opinion about whether child is getting a FAPE in the LRE.

Judge can order compensatory services, reimbursement, future services, but not money damages

Page 44: Special Education Law Presented by: Jane R. Wettach Clinical Professor of Law, Duke Law School Director, Duke Children’s Law Clinic.

For legal help, contact: Children’s Law Clinic

Duke Law School 919-613-7169

Free legal advice and representation for low-income families living in an 11-county region around Durham, NC