Speaker: Takeshi SUZUKI

　　　　　　 Port Security Inspector, General Affairs Division,

Ports and Harbors Bureau,

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure Transport and Tourism

(MLIT)

Economy: JAPAN

Progress Report on Progress Report on ASEAN - Japan ASEAN - Japan

Maritime Transport Security ProgramMaritime Transport Security Program

22

Country C

Factory

Check

PFSO

Check

Check

SSO

Check

PFSOCountry B

Country F

Country E

Country A

The weak points of SOLAS/ISPSWhere no external audit scheme exists for security measures, and unless every country implements and maintains effective security measures at their ports and on their ships, our trade network will not remain secure.

Necessity of cooperationUrge and assist every Contracting Government to implement SOLAS/ISPS effectively and continuously by establishing a PDCA cycle in each country.

Why international cooperation is important?

Country D

BackgroundBackground

Trade partners may be in

danger if one port does not

implement effective security

measures

33

Date:Date: January 12-13, 2006January 12-13, 2006Place:Place: TokyoTokyoSponsor:Sponsor: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and

Transport, JapanTransport, Japan Attending countries(15) and organizations(3):Attending countries(15) and organizations(3):

Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Russian Federation, Singapore, Malaysia, Russian Federation, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States of America, United Kingdom, United States of America, EC, EC, ICAO, IMO, WCOICAO, IMO, WCO

Approximate number of attendance:Approximate number of attendance:220 220 (50 from Japan and 170 from other (50 from Japan and 170 from other countries)countries)

Ministerial Conference onMinisterial Conference on International Transport Security International Transport Security

http://www.mlit.go.jp/sogoseisaku/kokusai_e/minister_e.html

44

Resolve to continue, in cooperation with IMO and other appropriate fora,

to provide necessary assistance and support to Contracting Governments to the 1974 SOLAS Convention

in enhancing their ability and capacity to implement appropriate security measures

at their port facilities through further international and regional efforts

Ministerial Conference onMinisterial Conference on International Transport Security International Transport Security

Ministerial StatementMinisterial Statement on Security in International Maritime Transport Sectoron Security in International Maritime Transport Sector

55

Capacity Building efforts and initiatives on Maritime SecurityCapacity Building efforts and initiatives on Maritime Security

Strong but difficult and time-consuming in establishing universal framework.Strong but difficult and time-consuming in establishing universal framework.

Quick but need lots of resources. Possible overlaps with other donors.Quick but need lots of resources. Possible overlaps with other donors.

- If facing common issues, can learn from each other & streamline efforts.- If facing common issues, can learn from each other & streamline efforts.

Global approachGlobal approach

Bilateral approachBilateral approach

Regional approachRegional approach

approaches to assist Capacity Building effortsapproaches to assist Capacity Building effortsapproaches to assist Capacity Building effortsapproaches to assist Capacity Building efforts

Japan’s regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan’s regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan’s regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APECJapan’s regional approach through ASEAN/Japan & APEC

Further efforts on capacity building are required.

However, overlaps or even conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized.

Also such efforts should be coordinated and appropriately targeted.

Further efforts on capacity building are required.

However, overlaps or even conflicts between various bilateral & regional efforts need to be minimized.

Also such efforts should be coordinated and appropriately targeted.

66

ASEAN-Japan Transport Partnership Projects

Currently, 21 projects are in progress,

and among them, 7 projects are maritime & port projects

• AJMT-1 ASEAN-Japan Seafarers Policy Cooperation

• AJMT-2 ASEAN-Japan Maritime Transport Security Program

• AJMT-3 ASEAN-Japan Cruise Promotion Project

• AJMT-4 ASEAN-Japan High-Speed Maritime Network

• AJMT-5 ASEAN “Mega-Float” Promotion Project

• AJMT-6 ASEAN-Japan Port Technology Joint Research Project

• AJMT-7 ASEAN-Japan Cooperation on Coast Guard Development

ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2)ASEAN/Japan Maritime Transport Security Program (AJMT-2)

77

A/J 1st Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2003.12)

A/J 2nd Seminar on Maritime Security and Combating Piracy (2005.3)

2004.7- SOLAS/ISPS entered into force

Seminar in Indonesia (2004.3)

A/J WS in Philippines (2004.4)

A/J Seminar in Myanmar (2004.5)

A/J WS in Vietnam (2004.6)

2005.10 JICA Training Course on Port Facility Security

A/J Seminar/WS in Thailand (2005.7)

A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2006.4)WS in Myanmar (2005.11) JICA/APEC Seminar in Indonesia (2005.12)

APEC WS in Vietnam (2005.12)

1st stage:How to comply

with SOLAS

2nd stage:How effectively &

continuously implement SOLAS

2007.2 A/J Regional Action Plan on Port Security (RAPPS) Accepted

A/J Seminar in Cambodia (2004.5)

APEC Seminar in Malaysia (2006.6)

1st PSEM in Bangkok (2006.4) 2nd PSEM in Yokohama (2006.10) A/J JE (2007.2) 3rd PSEM in Jakarta (2007.3) 4th PSEM in Fukuoka (2007.9) A/J JE (2008.1, 2008.11) 5th PSEM in Kuala Lumpur (2008.3) 6th PSEM in Nagoya (2009.2 proposed)

2005.10 A/J Port Security Policy Dialogue 3rd stage:How to check &

upgrade security measures

Development of “manuals on port security measures”“manuals on port security measures” and implementation of “Joint Exercise (JE)”“Joint Exercise (JE)” through discussion in ‘A/J Port Security Experts Meeting (PSEM)’A/J Port Security Experts Meeting (PSEM)’

88

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

4-6 7-9 10-12 1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 1-6 7-12 1-6 7-12 1-6

A/J

Maritime

Transport

Security

Program

A/J

Port

Security

Experts

Meeting

Each

ASEAN

Country

A/J Transport Policy WS

Jun, Miyazaki

Submit

A/J STOM & ATM Feb, Bangkok

Submit

PLAN, DO CHECKACTION

Individual Action Plan

IAP＋

Collective Actions

Preparation for RAPPS

1) Discuss draft PFSA & PFSP manuals

2) Discuss Technical Guideline

3) Discuss scenarios for JCE

Joint Exercise

Training course on Port Security

Oct, 07 Yokohama

Training course on

Port Security Sep, 08

Training course on Port Security

Oct, 09

1) Finalize PFSA & PFSP

2) Finalize Technical Guideline

3) Follow up JCE

1) Discuss DOS manual

2) Discuss Best Practice

1) Finalize DOS manual

2) Finalize Best Practice Book

3) Follow up JE

4) Revise RAPPS

1) Discuss Audit Program on Port Security

2) Follow up JE

1) Finalize Audit Program on port security

2) Follow up JE

Accept

Time limit to submit PFSP info to IMO

Jul 09

PSEM1 PSEM2 PSEM3 PSEM4 PSEM6 PSEM7

Joint Exercise

Joint Exercise

Joint Exercise

A/J Maritime Transport WG

Vietnam

PSEM5

Roadmap for ASEAN-Japan RAPPSRoadmap for ASEAN-Japan RAPPS

Current ProgramsCurrent Programs

• ASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint ExerciseASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint Exercise

• JICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityJICA Training Course on Port Facility Security

99

1010

The 6The 6thth ASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint Exercise (JE6) ASEAN/Japan Maritime Security Joint Exercise (JE6)Date:Date: November 5, 2008 November 5, 2008 Place:Place: Hai Phong port, VietnamHai Phong port, VietnamOrganizers:Organizers: MLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINEMLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINE Participated countries & ports: Participated countries & ports: 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next

slideslideAim:Aim: to enhance the port security of participation countries through to enhance the port security of participation countries through

efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related information.information.

Date:Date: November 5, 2008 November 5, 2008 Place:Place: Hai Phong port, VietnamHai Phong port, VietnamOrganizers:Organizers: MLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINEMLIT (Japan) and VINAMARINE Participated countries & ports: Participated countries & ports: 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next 19 ports from 10 countries as shown in the next

slideslideAim:Aim: to enhance the port security of participation countries through to enhance the port security of participation countries through

efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related efficient exchange and sharing of maritime security related information.information.• Scenario: International terrorist organization planted bombs in container cargos targeting Japan

and ASEAN countries, and several incidents occur in Hai Phong port.• Overall Exercise Controller (OEC) provide information on the case to the participating countries.• Each country’s official gives information to the participating ports and relevant organizations.• Each port make necessary actions based on their PFSP, and share information with other

participants such as change in Maritime Security Level.

• Scenario: International terrorist organization planted bombs in container cargos targeting Japan and ASEAN countries, and several incidents occur in Hai Phong port.

• Overall Exercise Controller (OEC) provide information on the case to the participating countries.• Each country’s official gives information to the participating ports and relevant organizations.• Each port make necessary actions based on their PFSP, and share information with other

participants such as change in Maritime Security Level.

OverviewOverview

• DOS was exchanged among ports and vessel with higher security level.• Information on finding WMD (weapons of mass destruction) and suspicious ships was

exchanged smoothly.• Several countries changed security level or strengthened security, and informed other countries.

• DOS was exchanged among ports and vessel with higher security level.• Information on finding WMD (weapons of mass destruction) and suspicious ships was

exchanged smoothly.• Several countries changed security level or strengthened security, and informed other countries.

ResultResult

• Largely succeeded in the exercise aim.• Contents requiring real-time judgment should be increased from the next exercise.• Largely succeeded in the exercise aim.• Contents requiring real-time judgment should be increased from the next exercise.

EvaluationEvaluation

1111

Exercise areaExercise area Participating 19 ports from 10 countries Participating 19 ports from 10 countries

Yokkaichi

Nagoya

Manila

Yangon

Hai Phong

Laem Chabang

Bangkok

Sihanoukville

Kota Kinabalu

Singapore

Tanjung Priok

KuchingSibu

Miri TawauMuara

Labuan Sandakan

Lahad Datu

1212

Scenes from the Joint ExerciseScenes from the Joint Exercise

Exercise Controlling Field exercise

Evaluation meeting DOS exchange

1313

JICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityJICA Training Course on Port Facility SecurityInvited CountriesInvited Countries

Mainly ASEANMainly ASEAN

CurriculumCurriculum (1) Basic knowledge(1) Basic knowledge

Basic knowledge on ISPS, security regime and initiative under Basic knowledge on ISPS, security regime and initiative under IMO and major countries including Japan, security threat and IMO and major countries including Japan, security threat and terrorist activity.terrorist activity.

(2) Table-top exercise(2) Table-top exercise Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port Table-top exercise by role-playing the key players on port

security.security. (The latest course used the APEC Drills and Exercise Manual)(The latest course used the APEC Drills and Exercise Manual)

(3) Site visit(3) Site visit Site visit to various types of port facilities for example at Site visit to various types of port facilities for example at

Yokohama and Nagoya ports.Yokohama and Nagoya ports.

(4) Application(4) Application Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits.Interactive exercises on PFSA, PFSP and Audits.

Future planFuture plan

• Being aware of the importance of further regional cooperation for capacity building,

• Japan will continue to make efforts for enhancing maritime security in this region in cooperation with the other relevant countries.

1414