Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation...

18
Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama

Transcript of Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation...

Page 1: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Spatial Clustering

Yogi Vidyattama

Page 2: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Main methodology

• Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation

where:Zi = deviation of point i to the mean

Wij = the spatial weights matrix

m2 = total variance ( )

• Weight matrix– The nature of spatial relationship: contiguity

N

Zm i i

2

2

j

jiji

i ZWm

ZI

2

Page 3: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

3

Methodology

• Weight matrices – Describes the nature of the spatial relationships

• Rook-Contiguity based

– As opposed to• Queen-Contiguity based

• Distance based

Page 4: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

What it has been used for

• Concentration area of disadvantage– Joblessness– Overcrowded housing– Less developed region– Ethnic group: Ancestry, Language

• Why?– Spill over effect– Intertemporal effect– Public service/ infrastructure distribution

• Further analysis necessary– Changes over time – Different behaviour/attitude– Impact on regression

Page 5: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

¯0 25 5012.5 Kilometers

Legend

Dual Carriageway

Principal Road

Not significant (48)

High-High (9)

Low-Low (7)

Low-High (0)

High-Low (0)

Sydney Fairfield

Bankstown

Warringah (A)

Parramatta

Strathfield (A)

Pittwater (A)

Gosford (C)

Moran's I = 0.5185

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Standard Deviation of %CJH 2001

Sta

nd

ard

De

via

tio

n o

f n

eig

hb

ou

r's

%C

JH

20

01

Parramatta (C) - South

Sydney (C) - West

Warringah (A)

Bankstown-South

Strathfield (A)

Fairfield (C) - East

Fairfield (C) - West

Parramatta (C) - North-West

Gosford (C) - West

Children in Jobless household

Page 6: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

¯0 25 5012.5 Kilometers

Legend

Dual Carriageway

Principal Road

Not significant (46)

High-High (9)

Low-Low (7)

Low-High (2)

High-Low (0)

Sydney Fairfield

Bankstown

Warringah (A)

Parramatta

Strathfield (A)

Pittwater (A)

Gosford (C)

Moran's I = 0.5244

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Standard Deviation of %CJH 2006

Sta

nd

ard

Dev

iatio

n o

f nei

gh

bo

ur'

s %

CJH

200

6

Parramatta (C) - South

Sydney (C) - West

Warringah (A)

Fairfield (C) - East

Fairfield (C) - West

Parramatta (C) - North-West

Strathfield (A)

Bankstown-South

Gosford (C) - West

Children in Jobless household

Page 7: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

¯0 10 205 Kilometers

Legend

Dual Carriageway

Principal Road

Not significant (50)

High-High (13)

Low-Low (14)

Low-High (2)

High-Low (0)

Hobsons Bay (C) - Williamstown

Hume (C) - Broadmeadows

Whittlesea (C) - South

Melbourne (C)

Nillumbik (S) - South

Darebin (C) - Northcote

Moran's I = 0.3822

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Standard Deviation of % CJH 2001

Sta

nd

ard

De

via

tio

n o

f n

eig

hb

or'

s %

CJ

H 2

00

1

Hobsons Bay (C) - Williamstown

Darebin (C) - Northcote

Melbourne (C) - Inner

Hume (C) - Broadmeadows

Whittlesea (C) - South-West

Nillumbik (S) - South

Whittlesea (C) - South-East

Melbourne (C) - Remainder

Children in Jobless household

Page 8: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

¯0 10 205 Kilometers

Legend

Dual Carriageway

Principal Road

Not significant (53)

High-High (8)

Low-Low (15)

Low-High (3)

High-Low (0)

Hobsons Bay (C) - Williamstown

Hume (C) - Broadmeadows

Whittlesea (C) - South

Melbourne (C)

Nillumbik (S) - South

Darebin (C) - Northcote

Moran's I = 0.3646

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

Standard Deviation of % CJH 2006

Sta

nd

ard

Dev

iati

on

of

nei

gh

bo

ur'

s %

CJH

200

6

Moonee Valley (C) - West Hobsons Bay (C) - Williamstown Darebin (C) - Northcote

Melbourne (C) - Inner

Hume (C) - Broadmeadows

Whittlesea (C) - South-

Nillumbik (S) - South

Whittlesea (C) - South-East

Melbourne (C) - Remainde

Children in Jobless household

Page 9: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

EthnicitySYDNEY

Cluster 2006 2011Ancestry - not significant 28.38 30.35 - high-high 62.03 66.42 - low-low 8.55 8.89 - low-high 25.16 21.79 - high-low 33.51 37.36Language - not significant 27.42 30.35 - high-high 64.44 66.42 - low-low 6.66 8.89 - low-high 25.93 21.79 - high-low 33.42 37.36English - not significant 15.48 15.16 - high-high 27.24 26.35 - low-low 6.61 5.82 - low-high 12.21 10.41 - high-low 19.85 17.28

Page 10: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

EthnicityMELBOURNE

Cluster 2006 2011Ancestry - not significant 24.95 27.33 - high-high 51.39 56.39 - low-low 8.04 9.06 - low-high 18.45 12.95 - high-low 28.04 33.32Language - not significant 25.88 28.08 - high-high 55.09 58.13 - low-low 6.82 7.99 - low-high 19.72 16.84 - high-low 28.66 33.59English - not significant 16.17 15.65 - high-high 28.21 26.48 - low-low 6.99 6.90 - low-high 10.97 10.52 - high-low 20.10 18.60

Page 11: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Cluster of HDI 1999

Page 12: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Cluster of HDI 2008

Page 13: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Moran’s “Arrow” plot of HDI 1999-2008

Page 14: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

• Disease– Contagion, connected topography

• Crime– Vulnerable target, location of criminal

• Natural disaster and its impact– Flood, fire, earthquake

Other used

Page 15: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

Software

• OpenGeoDa 09.09.12• AURIN PORTAL

Page 16: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

• Choose or import your dataset

• Spatialise your dataset

• Create your weight matrix

Step in AURIN portal

Page 17: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

• Calculate the Local Moran’s I statistics

• Visualise the result

Step in AURIN portal (2)

Page 18: Spatial Clustering Yogi Vidyattama. Main methodology Local Moran Index of Spatial Autocorrelation where: Z i = deviation of point i to the mean W ij =

• Percentage is mainly used but comparing the result to the result in number is often important

Analyse in AURIN portal